Skip to content
All-In PodcastAll-In Podcast

E139: Recapping Chamath's wedding, VC surplus, unions vs Hollywood, room-temp superconductors & more

(0:00) All-In in Italy!: Recapping Chamath's wedding (11:55) Discourse around obesity and weight loss in the US (21:56) Are there too many VCs? (38:18) Actors/Writers union vs. Corporate Hollywood, endgame for the modern Hollywood machine (54:07) Equity participations vs. unions, ownership upside vs. downside protections (1:05:04) Potential impact of room-temp superconductors Special thanks to our Italian audio/video team!: https://twitter.com/domdalmatico https://www.mattiacaruso.com Follow the besties: https://twitter.com/chamath https://linktr.ee/calacanis https://twitter.com/DavidSacks https://twitter.com/friedberg Follow the pod: https://twitter.com/theallinpod https://linktr.ee/allinpodcast Intro Music Credit: https://rb.gy/tppkzl https://twitter.com/yung_spielburg Intro Video Credit: https://twitter.com/TheZachEffect Referenced in the show: https://twitter.com/DavidSacks/status/1684176015948488704 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sPelOnd7Sik https://www.vice.com/en/article/4a3az9/venture-capital-vcs-existential-too-many https://twitter.com/jason/status/1681985828820766720 https://twitter.com/chamath/status/1679765658517610496 https://twitter.com/chamath/status/1679935918164135936 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.12008.pdf #allin #tech #news

Jason CalacanishostChamath PalihapitiyahostDavid FriedberghostNatalie PalihapitiyaguestGuestguest
Jul 27, 20231h 17mWatch on YouTube ↗

EVERY SPOKEN WORD

  1. 0:0011:55

    All-In in Italy!: Recapping Chamath's wedding

    1. JC

      Love you guys. Uh, hey, if you guys are a- around, you know, and uh-

    2. CP

      Anyone want to get a glass of wine and some pasta?

    3. JC

      ... maybe we'll get a glass of wine later.

    4. CP

      Yeah.

    5. JC

      Maybe next week or something. Who knows? Maybe we all get together in person and have a glass of wine.

    6. CP

      I'll see you soon. I love you guys.

    7. JC

      Yeah, bye. Bye. Bye.

    8. CP

      That's so nice. I love you besties. Ciao.

    9. JC

      Ciao, ciao. Ciao, ciao. (whoosh)

    10. DS

      You're about to come to Italy and basically you're gonna gain 15 pounds, for sure.

    11. DF

      (laughs) No. Okay, so we were there in Italy.

    12. JC

      This is a long time ago. Is this when we were in Venice?

    13. DS

      The quality of Italian white wine is outrageous.

    14. JC

      Really?

    15. DS

      It's outrageous.

    16. JC

      Do they have a men's bikini for you?

    17. DS

      Oh my god. I would buy that.

    18. JC

      For when we're in Italy?

    19. DS

      I would buy that.

    20. DF

      (laughs)

    21. JC

      Let's just say thank you to the amazing people of Italy for having-

    22. CP

      Oh, what an incredible country.

    23. JC

      ... the greatest country for adults to go on vacation in.

    24. DS

      What an incredible country.

    25. JC

      Here we go. In three, two... Hey. Oh, ah, he- uh.

    26. CP

      Hey, everybody.

    27. JC

      Uh, three, two-

    28. DF

      Someone's going through puberty.

    29. JC

      Hey, everybody. Wel-... Motorcycle.

    30. DF

      Try it again.

  2. 11:5521:56

    Discourse around obesity and weight loss in the US

    1. JC

      But we had a great time. There's been a lot of news. Uh...

    2. DF

      And J-Cal, you got here early, right? Weren't you, like, camping along the coastline because you wanted to see the sunset?

    3. JC

      Yes, I went to check the tide.

    4. GU

      You went camping. (laughs)

    5. DF

      You went camping.

    6. GU

      He was trying to-

    7. DF

      Decided to bring San Francisco to this beautiful, pristine-

    8. JC

      (laughs)

    9. DS

      Defecating everywhere. (laughs)

    10. DF

      Yes.... leaving a trail of needles in his wake. Ozempic needles. (laughs)

    11. JC

      Ozempic needles.

    12. DF

      Ozempic needles. Wegovy.

    13. DS

      Plastic trash.

    14. JC

      (laughs)

    15. DS

      He was trying to show he had Ozempic.

    16. JC

      I did pu- I did post a thirst trap.

    17. DF

      (laughs)

    18. JC

      I'm very proud. I'm down 41 pounds from the peak.

    19. DS

      (laughs)

    20. JC

      Uh, 20 pounds with, uh, hiking and using the fasting app that Kevin Rose built, and then the other half, uh, Zero, great fasting app, and the other half was Ozempic, Wegovy.

    21. DS

      I don't understand. What does an app do to help you fast? You just fast. You just don't eat.

    22. JC

      Uh, you click a button.

    23. DS

      Do you eat the app?

    24. JC

      It gives an animation.

    25. DS

      And not food?

    26. JC

      And then it-

    27. DS

      Oh, I see. (laughs)

    28. JC

      ... counts down the clock.

    29. DF

      Y- y- wh- when you're trying to decide whether to eat or not, you push a button, "Should I eat or not?" And it says no.

    30. DS

      (laughs)

  3. 21:5638:18

    Are there too many VCs?

    1. GU

    2. JC

      So, there was an article in Vice, I guess, that namechecked the All-In podcast and said young people, instead of wanting to become McKinsey consultants, now want to become members of the All-In podcast and be venture capitalists. I did a little tweet storm that I thought- and I thought it'd be a great topic for us. I- I think for young people going into venture early is not a good idea. I think, generally speaking, 80% of the case- cases. And I think starting your own company or joining a high-growth company or maybe joining a well-run large company, or even joining a poorly run large company so you learn what not to do, are all better things to do in your 20s. Learn, be in the trenches. But I'm curious what you think, Sax-

    3. CP

      Yeah.

    4. JC

      ... about this issue, because we came to venture and investing in our 40s, I believe, you know, both of us angel investors, and then both of us having fun. So, what are you- advising a young person who's listening to the podcast coming out of gr- business school or whatever.

    5. GU

      Yeah, I agree with that. Um, I think the main, uh, value prop that a VC has to offer a founder is advice. And if you've never walked in the founder's shoes before, if you've never founded a company or at least had a significant operating role, how are you in a position to offer them advice? Now, I think there was a period of time during the bull market where people stopped thinking that way, stopped thinking that advice was the model. VCs started competing on the base of who could be the biggest cheerleader for the founder, who could offer the most sort of positive emotional support-

    6. JC

      Largest valuation.

    7. GU

      ... or the biggest valuation or least governance. Um, the idea of being completely passive, not taking a board seat was actually sold to founders as a positive for them, that, like, "We'll invest and we'll just, like, stay completely out of the way." And all of those ideas sounded really good when the market was booming and everything was up and to the right. But now, we're in a situation in which we're going through two years of intense turmoil, and a lot of companies aren't gonna make it. A lot of companies are restructuring. A lot of companies are gonna take down rounds. And actually being able to tap your board for advice on how to get through a rough patch actually is pretty important. You realize now that, like, the uninvolved passive investor, that was not-... a, a positive value prop. That was an excuse for not having a value prop. And I think at times like this, it's really important to have VCs who've been around the block, who saw the last downturn, who ideally could have warned you that it was coming.

    8. JC

      Like we did on this pod for 18 months.

    9. GU

      Like we did repeatedly for, you know-

    10. JC

      Yes.

    11. GU

      ... a year.

    12. JC

      18 months, yeah. (laughs)

    13. GU

      And so, yeah, I think that we're now seeing the correction. And I, I fundamentally agree with your analysis that there are too many people who joined the ranks of VC who fundamentally didn't have a value prop. And that's why, I mean, at our firm, we require that everyone who joins the investment team have operating experience, and ideally founder experience, uh, because that is ultimately what you're gonna offer founders.

    14. JC

      Chamath, was too much of this people LARPing, live action role playing, VC with just absolutely no idea how this works? And now, what happens to those, you know, actor VCs who really are faced with portfolios that are upside down and they really have no idea how to weather a storm? It's, this has been a hard 18 months, let's be honest.

    15. DS

      Well, I think that it was a symptom of s- just the fact that there was a lot of free money in the system. And I don't know, the outcome is gonna be pretty basic, which is that they're gonna lose money for their limited partners. And those limited partners, if they're not totally stupid, will never give these people money again. And these people will need to just find a new job. And I don't say that in a celebratory way, it's just a very practical ones and zeros monetary assessment of the facts. Look, I think that the weird thing that has happened is that it became, like, this kind of fun thing to be able to say you were doing. A lot of people used to moonlight and do it on the side. Then there were all these services that would allow you to basically, like, abstract the job. But the only thing that I would just qualify your statement, 'cause I think what you're saying is, like, 90% right, but I don't think that's where the craziest outcome returns have come from. Because if you look at the two people that are really, or the three people that have really generated just gargantuan home run dr- returns on a consistent basis, one of them, for example, like Mike Moritz, really didn't have those bona fides operationally. But I think that what Mike pr- h- probably has, and I'm saying this not knowing him, is a preternatural, like, judge of psychology, I think. I think he's an incredibly qualified people judger. And there are people like that. Now, he's an outlier in order to do that, but the rest of us have to kind of, to your point, do with what we have, which is like, "Here's our experience and our maturity, and you know, we're telling you what we think." So I'm really excited actually for this wave to kind of crash on shore, because the number of founders that are gonna get screwed over by folks that don't know what they're talking about is very high.

    16. JC

      Yeah.

    17. DS

      And that needs to come to an end as quickly as possible.

    18. GU

      Free bird, yeah.

    19. CP

      Yeah, I don't think it's just Mike Moritz. I think that there's a class of successful venture capitalists. Bill Gurley's a great example. Like, he was an analyst. Danny Reimer at Index Ventures was an investment analyst. Um-

    20. JC

      Fred Wilson. Um...

    21. CP

      Fred Wilson.

    22. JC

      Yeah. Well, a lifetime VC, yeah.

    23. CP

      Um, and, and Moritz, John Doerr. I mean, John Doerr had some-

    24. JC

      Uh, Doerr worked at Intel.

    25. CP

      Yeah, he worked at Intel. Um, but there's, there are folks who have an incredible analytical capacity, and that analytical capacity translates into incredible selection capability. That selection doesn't necessarily mean that they are gonna necessarily be the best advisors. And I'm not saying that any of those folks are bad advisors. But there are some venture investors, like Founders Fund is very vocal about this and very public about this, that their objective is not to be your partner in helping you make decisions and run your company and recruit people and all the other sort of rigamarole that many VCs go out and tout. They are there to pick the best founders. And the best founders don't need the VC to be successful. And their job then is to have incredible selection capacity. So if they can select the best founders and get out of their way, they've made a lot of money and their returns are unbelievable. And then there are some VCs who are really incredible partners to their founders and their objective. Josh Kopelman at First Round built an entire firm around this practice, which is to partner very closely with founders and to build support and capabilities. Andreessen Horowitz was built on the same sort of concept.

    26. JC

      Closest to Mike.

    27. CP

      That they would, that they would roll all of their fees into building operating support and capacity to support founders and support companies. Both firms have obviously done well in their own right. Um, and so I don't know if there's necessarily one breed that predicts success when it comes to successful venture capital. I will say from my own personal experience, I worked as an investment banker for my first two years out of undergrad. I, you know, worked, I had a science background. I worked in, a short stint in private equity, I worked at Google, I did corp dev and M&A there. I started a company, ran it, sold it, did that with another business where I was on the board. So, you know, I've, I've been on a couple of different places around the table that, you know, I think have given me the ability to, to provide advice. I don't know if I necessarily have the same skill set that the team at Founders Fund and, um, Mike Moritz and others might have, had this astute extraordinary ability to spot founders a- and bring them in. So I think everyone needs to kind of recognize what they do bring to the table, be, uh, very clear about what that is. And I think to your point, there has just been an incredible bull market over the last 15 years. Since 2008, more money has... I, I heard an incredible statistic, by the way. Um, I don't want to get it wrong, so maybe we should fact check me after this, from someone at your wedding, uh, who I was talking to for a long time. And he was like, (laughs) he was like, "Basically, the top 1% of VCs didn't beat what would have happened if you just bought the top five public tech companies and, you know, effectively did a rebalance over the past 15 years." The bull market and the, um, the aggregation of value in technology has largely been 50/50 to public and private.

    28. JC

      Yeah.

    29. CP

      So, you could have just bought a few stocks and held onto them and beat all of the VCs over the last 15 years. Even though a bunch of VCs have made good money and their IRR looks like 12%, but you have to beat-

    30. DS

      No, the risk adjusted returns on venture-

  4. 38:1854:07

    Actors/Writers union vs. Corporate Hollywood, endgame for the modern Hollywood machine

    1. GU

      In Pod.

    2. Did anybody see Oppenheimer yet?

    3. No.

    4. I'm so excited.

    5. DS

      I, I didn't really see it.

    6. GU

      It's, it's gonna be a Barbenheimer double feature.

    7. Barbenheimer, Barbenheimer.

    8. DS

      In honor of the Barbenheimer wedding.

    9. GU

      Yeah. I'm not-

    10. (laughs)

    11. ... I'm not Barbenheimering it. I, I, I'm good.

    12. DS

      (laughs)

    13. GU

      That's a good one, the Barbenheimer one.

    14. I wanna see it on IMAX.

    15. 'Cause no one-

    16. I, I think we sh-

    17. No one had a... Nolan's like, so about 70 millimeter prints. He's like, "You have to watch it in 70 millimeter."

    18. Do you know the Metreon, uh, Metreon in-

    19. In the city.

    20. Is it?

    21. That's-

    22. So we should just rent the theater and invite some fans.

    23. Or just go. Yeah, I mean, we should do that. That's actually a great idea.

    24. No, we should just rent the... Let's rent it.

    25. This week.

    26. I've rented it before. It's, I think it's sold out until August 6th.

    27. I have very limited time. Oh, the theater is.

    28. We just have to call them and say, "Hey, can we rent the thing?"

    29. They'll do a show.

    30. "Here's 20 dimes."

  5. 54:071:05:04

    Equity participations vs. unions, ownership upside vs. downside protections

    1. CP

      great.

    2. DS

      On the union thing, I'll tell you a story. So recently, it was just announced that Anchor Steam shut down. Anchor Steam was this beer, this native beer in San Francisco that's been around forever.

    3. JC

      Japanese brewery bought them, right?

    4. DS

      It was bought by Sapporo several years ago. And-

    5. CP

      An- Anchor Steam shut down?

    6. DS

      Anchor Steam shut down.

    7. CP

      You're kidding me.

    8. DS

      Yeah.

    9. CP

      I used to go there all the time-

    10. DS

      Yeah.

    11. CP

      ... for, like, work events. You'd do, like, an off-site there and go to the brewery. It's in, uh-

    12. DS

      Yeah. It was, like, one of the original microbrews.

    13. CP

      Potrero Hill. Yeah, fantastic.

    14. JC

      Iconic.

    15. DS

      Uh, award-winning beer.

    16. JC

      Great beer.

    17. DS

      Iconic. Well, it's out of business now.

    18. CP

      You're kidding.

    19. DS

      And the reason is-

    20. JC

      Let me guess.

    21. CP

      (laughs)

    22. DS

      Well, it was losing money. And you wanna know why, is because three years ago, the workers all voted to unionize.

    23. GU

      ... there were only something like 60 workers, 62 workers. And three years ago, they vote to unionize, and they voted themselves big pay increases.

    24. JC

      Yeah.

    25. GU

      And so I guess Sapporo had to go along with it. Three years later, Sapporo's just like, "Eh," shut the whole thing down.

    26. JC

      Um, I think-

    27. GU

      And that, and that's, and that's the thing is you gotta be careful what you wish for.

    28. JC

      This is, this is-

    29. DS

      Overplay your hand I, I, I really think the thing with unions that they get wrong is unions fight for exactly this, which is this short-term increase in current compensation. And I think what unions do very poorly is actually understanding the long-term equity that the employees and members of that union actually create. I tweeted this a few weeks ago as well, but the single biggest reason that motivated me when I sold my piece of the Warriors was obviously just the crazy increase in the valuation, right?

    30. JC

      Yes.

  6. 1:05:041:06:50

    Potential impact of room-temp superconductors

    1. JC

      wrap time, I think.

    2. CP

      Would you wanna do a quick science corner update? I got a lot of texts this week.

    3. JC

      Oh, actually.

    4. GU

      Room temp super conductor?

    5. CP

      Yeah. Yeah. Did you see this?

    6. GU

      Oh, there is a, uh ... Actually, it's a-

    7. CP

      Look, well-

    8. GU

      ... very, uh, interesting, um, warp control.

    9. CP

      You, you may remember a few episodes ago ... And if you, if you don't remember, you kinda can go back and watch it, um, where I talked a little bit about the effort to try and identify a material that can be superconducting at room temperature, which means no resistance. Electrons can flow through the material with no re- resistance, perfect, um, electricity transfer across distance, and also enables the Meissner effect, where magnetic waves can reflect off of the material, which can allow things like levitating trains, which is very low friction transportation. All these benefits of superconducting materials, uh, quantum computing, et cetera. So yesterday, and, and I've gotten literally dozens of emails and notes about this in the last 12 hours, there was a paper published by a team in South Korea who seem like a very legit team. There's no reason why they would kind of make a, a fraudulent claim that there's a material that they've identified and measured to show has superconducting properties at room temperature and ambient pressure, where a lot of these efforts historically have been made at room temperature but they use 200 times atmospheric pressure to compress it. And it turns out that this material that they're using is a lead, uh, apatite, which is a, uh, it's a hexagonal crystal that uses, uh, calcium phosphate and lead, and that some of the cal- uh, the lead gets replaced with copper, and the copper causes the hexagon, the crystal structure to compress a little bit. That compressed crystal allows the electrons to flow through. This is their theoretical explanation on what's going on. It will be replicated. People will try and do what they are now claiming they did to demonstrate this. There were some condensed matter physics people that sent me an email and said they don't think that this is real. They have great deal of skepticism.

Episode duration: 1:17:46

Install uListen for AI-powered chat & search across the full episode — Get Full Transcript

Transcript of episode gpDzcCHERX4

Get more out of YouTube videos.

High quality summaries for YouTube videos. Accurate transcripts to search & find moments. Powered by ChatGPT & Claude AI.

Add to Chrome