The Sex Expert: "Casual Sex Is Almost Always Dangerous For Women!" - Louise Perry

You recommend waiting until engagement before sex; how would you practically advise a non-religious 22-year-old woman in a hyper-casual dating culture to implement that without becoming totally isolated from the dating pool?

Louise Perry argues that the sexual revolution, turbocharged by the Pill, has created a sexual culture that disproportionately harms women and destabilizes relationships, while primarily benefiting a small subset of high‑status men.

If monogamy is ‘sexual socialism’ that stabilizes society, what specific legal or policy changes—beyond cultural persuasion—would you support to nudge Western societies back toward durable monogamous marriage without coercion?

She contends that biological sex differences—physical strength, psychology, hormones, and reproductive risk—are central to understanding rape, casual sex, porn, and dating dynamics, and that denying these differences puts young women especially at risk.

You argue porn significantly drives rough sex and choking; what kind of empirical study or evidence would you consider strong enough to either confirm or seriously challenge that causal link?

Perry defends monogamous marriage and delayed sex (ideally until engagement) as a protective ‘technology’ for women, children, and social stability, and warns of broader problems like collapsing birth rates, porn-driven sexual scripts, and angry, sexless young men.

Given that some women genuinely enjoy casual sex and BDSM, how do you distinguish between authentic female desire and memetic, porn-influenced scripts—and what criteria would you use to say, ‘this preference is likely self-harming’?

Despite her views being culturally unpopular, she reports strong grassroots support from fathers, disillusioned women, and readers who feel misled by mainstream feminist narratives about liberation, sex, and motherhood.

You frame step-parenthood as a major risk factor via the Cinderella effect; what nuanced safeguards or support systems could we create for blended families that acknowledge those risks without stigmatizing the many step-parents who are loving and safe?