Skip to content
The Joe Rogan ExperienceThe Joe Rogan Experience

Joe Rogan Experience #1084 - Douglas Murray

Douglas Murray, author of "The Strange Death of Europe" which is out now, is an author, journalist, and political commentator. He is the founder of the Centre for Social Cohesion and is the associate director of the Henry Jackson Society and associate editor of The Spectator, a British magazine discussing culture and politics.

Joe RoganhostDouglas Murrayguest
Feb 26, 20181h 56mWatch on YouTube ↗

EVERY SPOKEN WORD

  1. 0:023:39

    YouTube strikes for “hate speech” just for sharing a conversation

    1. JR

      Keep this about a fist away.

    2. DM

      Okay.

    3. JR

      (clears throat) And we're live. Douglas, first of all, thanks for joining me. Appreciate it.

    4. DM

      Great pleasure to be with you.

    5. JR

      Looking forward to talking to you.

    6. DM

      Likewise.

    7. JR

      You've become, uh, an example to me ... or your conversation with Sam Harris has become an example to me of how squirrelly things have gotten lately with the way people interpret conversations about ideas.

    8. DM

      Right.

    9. JR

      Because of this. Jamie, pull that thing up. This is, uh, a tweet that someone sent out, and he got a strike, a community guideline strike-

    10. DM

      (laughs)

    11. JR

      ... just for listening, just for putting you on his playlist, a conversation between Sam Harris and you, and, uh-

    12. DM

      Yeah.

    13. JR

      ... he, this man, um ... or I don't know if it's a man. I'm b- I'm, uh ... I just assumed. I'm, I'm a problem. I'm part of the problem, part of the patriarchy. P-T-R-K-C-C-X on Twitter. Uh, that is his screen name, his, or her, or zir screen name on Twitter. And got a community guideline strike-

    14. DM

      Right.

    15. JR

      ... for just putting this. Now I brought this up to ... uh, I was having dinner with some friends, one of them who used to work at Google, and someone who was there was a, uh, you know, highly ranked person at YouTube. I brought this up. And the exact quote was, uh, "That was because it's hate speech."

    16. DM

      Right.

    17. JR

      And I said, "You said that so flippantly." I go, "Please tell me the contents of the conversation." Do you know what they talked about?" I go, "How did you say that?" She goes, "Well, I'm sure if someone m- marked it as a community guideline ..."

    18. DM

      Right.

    19. JR

      "That ... Or, or as a c- strike, a community strike ..." What is it called? A community guideline strike? Yeah. "That they must be hate speech."

    20. DM

      Right.

    21. JR

      I'm like, "Do you, do you understand this is Douglas Murray and Sam Harris?"

    22. DM

      Right.

    23. JR

      "I, I, I bet, I bet that's not what the conversation was about."

    24. DM

      (laughs) I, I, I bet it wasn't too.

    25. JR

      S-

    26. DM

      I'm try- I'm trying to think what we did talk about now. It's making me nervous. I mean, but I know that ... I know it definitely wasn't hate speech, by any sane definition of those words. Um, but th- the, you ... this is, this sorta thing is very disturbing to me-

    27. JR

      Very disturbing.

    28. DM

      ... because, um, you ... and you noticed it happening with other people, of course.

    29. JR

      Yes.

    30. DM

      And that's disturbing enough. It's more disturbing, of course, when it happens to you, but slightly surreal. Uh, uh, I mean, I know Sam Harris a bit. Um, not a hateful person, uh, uh, my most sorta yogic, calm, blissed-out, West Coast of America friend. And I'm, um, pretty amazed that anyone at Google or anyone else would think that anything that could come out of his mouth was hate streetch- uh, hate speech, unless you decided that hate speech is just anything you personally don't like or that words don't matter anymore.

  2. 3:394:28

    From “troublemaker” labels to incentive structures that create extremists

    1. JR

      Um, I had ... uh, another thing that I talked about with this, uh, same person, I brought up Jordan Peterson and, you know, that there's, there's issues with every time he's on podcasts, the podcasts get flagged-

    2. DM

      Right.

    3. JR

      ... for demonetization, and, and-

    4. DM

      Right.

    5. JR

      ... the exact words were, "He's a troublemaker."

    6. DM

      (laughs) Yeah.

    7. JR

      And I'm like, "What in the fuck are you talking about?"

    8. DM

      Yeah.

    9. JR

      Like, do ... are you listening to his conversations? He is very articulate, and he's extremely careful-

    10. DM

      Yeah.

    11. JR

      ... going over these ideas-

    12. DM

      Yeah.

    13. JR

      ... that I think we should all be discussing. So, to call this hate speech or to call someone a troublemaker, it ... to me, it's symbl- simplify- or symbolizes what we're, what we're dealing with today. This is a very strange time when it comes to communication and the people that regulate and distribute our communication.

  3. 4:2810:06

    How “hate speech” inflation backfires: cynicism, gate collapse, and history repeating

    1. DM

      It, it, it is, and, uh, whenever I've had a chance to speak with people in that kind of world, who ... in that sort of role, the question I always want to ask them, among other things, is, "Do you know where this is gonna lead? Um, do you know what it's gonna do if you keep breaking down definitions, and terms, and words? Do you know what happens, for instance, down the road, if, if you keep on saying that Sam Harris and Douglas Murray having a conversation about something is hate speech? Do you know what relief that's going to give other people down the road about what they're gonna be able to get away with?"

    2. JR

      Hmm.

    3. DM

      This is what's being created all the time at the moment, it seems to me, this, this idea that you, you police the discussion along incredibly narrow lines to- uh, that happen to surround your own comfort zone, um, a- and call everything outside it ... not just stuff I don't agree with or things that I would argue with or debate with, but hate speech. Uh, it's just, I think, very, very dangerous down the road. You can see exactly the trail that bit of gunpowder goes to.

    4. JR

      (smacks lips) I can. Where do you think it goes?

    5. DM

      I think it goes to a point where people become cynical about any, any claims made about anyone. And the likelihood is that if 99 times you've seen Sam Harris, Douglas Murray, Joe Rogan, Jordan Peterson, whoever called hate speech, then the hundredth time that somebody uses the term hate speech might be on somebody who is engaging in hate speech, and all your defenses are gonna be down. You've got nothing ... you're, you're very likely to become ... uh, very unlikely, sorry, to become skeptical-... um, and think I'm really gonna dig down. Most of us don't have time. We don't have time to, to find out every single thought and word that someone has uttered or thought. And so it seems very likely to me that down the road, very, very bad people are able to get through the gates because we kept on making erroneous claims frivolously for our own short-term gain and for our own short-term comfort and will end up basically bringing the gates down completely.

    6. JR

      I agree with you, and I, I think there's been a lot of discussion lately as well that I agree with where when you make these ridiculous claims about conversations-

    7. DM

      Mm-hmm.

    8. JR

      ... you, you empower, you actually empower radical people who oppose left-wing ideology.

    9. DM

      Yes.

    10. JR

      They get more extreme. You empower the extremists because they know that you are incorrect. They have evidence of it, they see your ridiculous behavior. And the other really disturbing aspect of it is these are the people that are distributing speech in-

    11. DM

      Right.

    12. JR

      ... I mean, I, I mean, think about how many discussions are viewed daily on YouTube. It's stunning.

    13. DM

      Yeah, yeah, yeah. Um, th- there, um, y- there's so much. I mean, we're at the beginning of this, aren't we? Because, I mean, there's a long way for this to run-

    14. JR

      Yes.

    15. DM

      ... a long way for the censorship to run, a long... You can't help thinking, among other things, that the people trying to make the rules at the moment have no idea of the fact that these debates have happened before-

    16. JR

      Right.

    17. DM

      ... or have not bothered to look into them and seem to think that history started with them. And, and I just wish that among other things with social media, people realize we, we, we have been through this several times before at least and, and the lessons are pretty clear. Uh, they are not that you can limit speech in order to attain political nirvana, for instance. Uh, nor are they that you can simply use, as I say, for short-term gain, accusations you know to be wrong-

    18. JR

      Right.

    19. DM

      ... in order to further a short-term political goal. Uh, uh, we, we know all this. We, we've been through it. Printing press, we went through it with John Stuart Mill, we went through it with Milton. I just wish these people had any idea of the fact that history started before their parents conceived them.

    20. JR

      Well, it's such... The, the, the whole culture of, uh, tech today is such a progressive thought bubble. It's, it's an echo chamber and it's very, very-

    21. DM

      Yeah.

    22. JR

      I, like I said, it's better that they're really progressive and open-minded and left-wing than radical right-wing. I think it's better.

    23. DM

      Yeah, uh, no, I agree. I mean, if, if, if by radical right-wing you mean, you know, kind of neo-Nazi-

    24. JR

      Racists.

    25. DM

      ... racists or something.

    26. JR

      Yes.

    27. DM

      Yeah, of course. Um, although these people have all, as I say, all the ability to create those people.

    28. JR

      Right.

    29. DM

      Um, which is-

    30. JR

      And empower.

  4. 10:0612:58

    Cancellation dynamics: fear, permanent records, and the internet’s unforgiving memory

    1. DM

      Yeah. And, but it's not surprising that more people don't want to stick their heads above that parapet-

    2. JR

      Right.

    3. DM

      ... because, I mean, if you had a normal job, uh, you worked in a normal office or shop or something, you, you really would don't want this coming towards you.

    4. JR

      Right.

    5. DM

      Um, I, I mean, this, this can tear apart and tear down people who spend a lifetime demonstrating they are not the thing-

    6. JR

      Right.

    7. DM

      ... that they're being accused of. So if nobody knows anything about you, you have no particular persona out there, you have no particular back record, uh, you don't want this thing coming to tear your life down.

    8. JR

      Right, because r- recovering from that accusation is almost impossible and would take forever.

    9. DM

      Yes. It is basically impossible, and all that you do along the way is to, to keep reminding people of the charge. (laughs)

    10. JR

      That's true. Right.

    11. DM

      And, and if you were to ever win on a technicality, like everyone would have forgotten, you know. Oh yeah, that's the, uh, that's the racist.

    12. JR

      That's the rapist. Yeah.

    13. DM

      That's... (laughs)

    14. JR

      I mean...

    15. DM

      That's the guy who was pro-rape, isn't it?

    16. JR

      Yeah. (laughs)

    17. DM

      Yeah, I remember him. Yeah.

    18. JR

      It's so simple, but it's... I feel like we're in some strange adolescent stage of communication, and there's been, uh, a bunch of talk lately, uh, there's, there were some... Something that I tweeted earlier today, some new technology that they believe where AI is gonna allow people to literally see other people's thoughts.

    19. DM

      Right.

    20. JR

      And I, I am... I, I mean, I am-

    21. DM

      (laughs)

    22. JR

      ... forever optimistic but also terrified. And my feeling is that our transition from language... Here it is, new AI system can see what you are thinking-

    23. DM

      Oh, yeah, yeah. So it is.

    24. JR

      ... which is just, what the hell does that mean? I'm, I'm concerned but also optimistic. I feel like we're in this transitionary period from regular communication to written communication, to written communication online-

    25. DM

      Right.

    26. JR

      ... to speech online, video online, where there's this instant access to all this and these ideas are being debated and tossed around like beach balls in real time.

    27. DM

      Mm-hmm.

    28. JR

      And ideas are being distorted. Uh, people's positions are being distorted-

    29. DM

      Yeah.

    30. JR

      ... for, for other people's gains, and that there is this willful...... misuse of the truth.

  5. 12:5824:48

    Social media as addiction and “idea sport”: outrage, points, and constant conflict

    1. DM

      It is about that at the moment is, um, how can we make sure that- that the other side trips up on this side? I've- I've thought this, I've written this all- all through the Me Too, uh, era that, uh, in- in your country and in mine, people basically are willing to go for somebody who is a political opponent who does something very minimal, and they're willing to defend somebody on their own side who does something bigger.

    2. JR

      Yes.

    3. DM

      And- and you can see it all the time. It just, there are different standards that apply to your own side than apply to the other, and people don't seem to be hiding it very much anymore.

    4. JR

      Not at all.

    5. DM

      Um-

    6. JR

      They really don't have the ability to hide it.

    7. DM

      No. We had a case recently in the UK where, um, somebody who was a great, uh, hero to the left, for all sorts of complicated reasons, um, was- is accused of some fairly um- fairly serious groping accusations, among others. And exactly the left-wing MPs who had been claiming that somebody who had sent out a tweet about a woman's breasts in 2009 should never hold any role in public, said that this person, who just happened to be a friend and an icon of theirs, was a changed man and we have to recognize it's 18 months ago now.

    8. JR

      (laughs)

    9. DM

      And you know, it's ...

    10. JR

      My favorite video on this was, uh, there was a guy who is, uh, some relig- religious Christian man on television and he was talking about Trump. And he was talking about who Trump was before he became president. He goes, "But I don't know about you, but I found Jesus and I did not have a past."

    11. DM

      (laughs)

    12. JR

      Put praise Jesus. And he's- he's saying this at everyone's chair-

    13. DM

      Wow.

    14. JR

      He, whoever he was before he found Jesus, like-

    15. DM

      Right.

    16. JR

      ... as if Trump got into office-

    17. DM

      Yes.

    18. JR

      ... and was like, "You know what? I'm a new man."

    19. DM

      (laughs)

    20. JR

      "I found Jesus."

    21. DM

      I got the Jesus pass.

    22. JR

      All that stuff that I did the last 70 years ...

    23. DM

      (laughs)

    24. JR

      (laughs)

    25. DM

      Well, some people- some people do think that it was- it was a- a journalist, Malcolm Muggeridge, a very distinguished figure in the media, um, some years ago. But who, it was often noted that his, he converted to Catholicism and he, uh, uh, a mutual friend once said that it was noticeable that Malcolm Muggeridge always attacked a vice immediately after he had become incapable of it himself.

    26. JR

      (laughs)

    27. DM

      (laughs) When it was clear that Muggeridge didn't have as much sex as he'd did fairly often in his youth, sex was a big problem.

    28. JR

      It's a giant problem.

    29. DM

      And, uh (...)

    30. JR

      Needs to let everybody know.

  6. 24:4829:50

    Trolling, threats, and the Erdogan poem stunt (plus the “donkey porn” saga)

    1. DM

      ... I do sometimes read what people s- say, send to me. Um, and I've never blocked anyone, because I sort of think you should might as well ... If you put your ideas out there, you might as well be as open as possible to receiving them back. Uh, some time ago when I got into a row with a, a, with the, uh, Turkish president about, uh, about something, uh, uh, I got all these Turkish, uh, uh, sort of accounts sending me stuff. There's one guy who just repeatedly sent me, uh, pornography of animals having sex with-

    2. JR

      (laughs)

    3. DM

      So (laughs) I don't know. It, it was very, it was very hard core. And, um, and so, I used to go down the feed and there were ... That guy ... And I didn't even block him, actually, because I sort of thought, "Well, somewhere in Turkey (laughs) is, is a really angry man, desperately finding horse pornography to send to me."

    4. JR

      (laughs)

    5. DM

      And in a way, I felt so sorry for him that that was how his life had come a ... You know, the end his life had come to at this stage, that I, I couldn't even block him. And also, he'd be like, "I'm the donkey porn guy who got blocked by donkey."

    6. JR

      (laughs)

    7. DM

      Now, he, he'd get a certain fame. (laughs)

    8. JR

      What was his motivation for sending you this stuff?

    9. DM

      He ... I had ... Um, it was because, uh, uh ... Well, the, the short story is, uh, a couple years ago, uh, the, the Turkish president tried to get the German chancellor to imprison a German comic for a very rude poem he'd read on air on German television that was insulting about the Ge- the Turkish president. And the German authorities actually started a case against the comedian-

    10. JR

      Whoa.

    11. DM

      ... for insulting the Turkish president, Erdoğan. And, uh, I, uh, decided to launch a, uh, uh, an offensive poetry competition to offend the Turkish president.

    12. JR

      (laughs)

    13. DM

      And there was a £1,000 cash prize, and it sort of took off and in the end, the now Foreign Secretary entered and won. (laughs)

    14. JR

      What?

    15. DM

      Yes.

    16. JR

      Really?

    17. DM

      That was great. Yes. It was really good because at, at, at the same time that the Germans were looking at imprisoning a, a comedian, uh, the, the now Foreign Secretary of the UK was guilty of precisely the same alleged crime, i.e. meaning it wasn't a crime, it couldn't be a crime. A, a couple of other people did. A wonderful, uh, Dutch comedian friend, Hans Jansson, uh, sort of did a similar thing at the time. He, he decided to do an interview live on Dutch television, explaining how much he hated Erdoğan because he still owed him money from the blowjob he'd given Erdoğan in a sauna.

    18. JR

      (laughs)

    19. DM

      And (laughs) , and ... It was live, live on Dutch television.

    20. JR

      Ugh. Oh.

    21. DM

      And the Dutch authorities were looking at ... Actually, were looking. They were asked if they would prosecute him. But anyhow, but the, but this was, this was ... I had a great time with this, of course, and I wrote a limerick explaining how, um, abusive I wanted people to be about Erdoğan, that it was necessary to be highly defamatory and you, you wouldn't get away with it if you just called him a wanker or something. So, I wrote the opening verse and invited the world to contribute, which they did.

    22. JR

      (laughs)

    23. DM

      And it became, among other things, the highest-paid poetry competition in the world,'cause if, if like me, you wrote a limerick, j- just five lines, this is £200 a line. I mean, no, no, uh, poetry, uh, uh, magazine could pay you for such, uh, uh, such, um, such work. So anyhow, on the basis of that, I became very, very unpopular in Turkey, and, uh, there were many, um, many, uh, pieces talking about how this gay, atheist, terrible Erdoğan hater in Britain was exactly what we were up against, so-

    24. JR

      (laughs)

    25. DM

      ... him and his poems ... (laughs)

    26. JR

      Oh my God.

    27. DM

      Yeah.

    28. JR

      Wow.

    29. DM

      Yeah.

    30. JR

      So, the German, uh, government was a- actually considering-

  7. 29:5042:47

    Charlie Hebdo, narrative reframing, and the “internalization of the fatwa”

    1. JR

      (laughs) Well, obviously, the worst case of retaliation for humor is probably Charlie Hebdo, right?

    2. DM

      Mm-hmm.

    3. JR

      I mean, which is a, a-

    4. DM

      Yeah.

    5. JR

      ... terrible and-... unfortunately, many people, um, weren't defending the murder but were talking, the murderers, I mean, I think-

    6. DM

      Yeah.

    7. JR

      ... how many... I think it was 11 people-

    8. DM

      Yeah.

    9. JR

      ... that were murdered.

    10. DM

      Yeah and, and a policeman also.

    11. JR

      And a police officer. Um, they, but they were saying that instead of concentrating on the murder, which was done completely out of this reinforcing their rules of their ideology-

    12. DM

      Mm-hmm.

    13. JR

      ... and, and retaliation for any mocking of that ideology. Instead of that, they were talking about how racist Charlie Hebdo was.

    14. DM

      Yeah.

    15. JR

      There was a lot of that. In fact, my friend Jamie Kilstein was a part of that.

    16. DM

      Right.

    17. JR

      He was on television d- back in his super social justice warrior days talking about that.

    18. DM

      Don't you wish, among other things, that people said, "No, I'm not talking about something if they don't know about it"?

    19. JR

      Yeah.

    20. DM

      You know, my guess was that until, until the murders, I mean, an infinitely small number of people knew about Charlie Hebdo outside of France.

    21. JR

      Right.

    22. DM

      I, I found myself in the wake of that, uh, in studios with people who I know had just Googled Charlie Hebdo the day before. I know that they'd just gone to Wikipedia and-

    23. JR

      Right.

    24. DM

      ... and read an English version of a claim about what that magazine was about. It goes back to that thing about, my point about the journalist and the Holocaust denial thing that just, just root around, a bunch of people have been killed, this doesn't seem to vindicate my side's ideology, therefore, let me find what I can do to defame them. And oh good, somebody at Charlie Hebdo once did this cartoon that was off color and I can't understand what the, the words are beneath it, but I'll, I'll claim it's racist. I mean, people were actually doing that.

    25. JR

      Yeah.

    26. DM

      They're actually, there were, there was a, um, there was one cartoon that was used against Charlie Hebdo after the massacre, uh, that was a joke against the Front National and the claims they were making about a Black woman in Sarkozy government. But because they, the joke and the, the j- if you didn't speak French, it wasn't clear apparently, but it, and if you knew nothing about recent French history, you knew nothing about the soc- the Sarkozy administration and the, and the, and the minister in question, these people just went to it and said, "Racist cartoon."

    27. JR

      Hmm.

    28. DM

      Not noticing that the cartoon was actually a joke about racists, but they didn't, they didn't bother to find that out. And I thought that, I thought that whole thing, among many, many other things, was deeply worrying from that point of view, because it means that in the immediate aftermath of something that should be so damn clear, a bunch of people can just try to reframe the narrative.

    29. JR

      Yeah.

    30. DM

      And re- and change the history of a publication. (laughs)

  8. 42:4751:43

    Escalation chain: from cartoons to texts—BBC self-censorship and clerical veto power

    1. JR

      One of the more uniquely American responses to the Charlie Hebdo attack was they had a Draw Mohammed contest in Texas.

    2. DM

      Yes, I followed that.

    3. JR

      Yeah, that was fascinating. And some guys-

    4. DM

      In Garland.

    5. JR

      ... showed up and started shooting at the building.

    6. DM

      Yeah.

    7. JR

      And they were killed almost immediately.

    8. DM

      Yes.

    9. JR

      Which is because they're in Texas and-

    10. DM

      (sighs)

    11. JR

      ... that's just not the place to fuck around. (laughs)

    12. DM

      Uh, true, although, I mean, it's, it's worth mentioning that, I mean, the, the, the, uh, editor at Charlie Hebdo had police protection-

    13. JR

      Mm-hmm.

    14. DM

      ... in Paris and they just, I mean, I suppose they, it's not worth dwelling on, but I mean, they, uh, the, the, the battle-trained, uh, people who were sent from Yemen.

    15. JR

      Yeah.

    16. DM

      To carry out that operation, which just were better prepared than, than-

    17. JR

      Right.

    18. DM

      ... the French authorities realized. Um-

    19. JR

      Well, but n- very few people are, uh, really ready to militarize cartoonist offices.

    20. DM

      Yes.

    21. JR

      I mean, and that's really almost what you would have to do. You would have-

    22. DM

      Yeah.

    23. JR

      ... to have, you know, Navy SEALs with bulletproof vests.

    24. DM

      Yes, and then-

    25. JR

      Locked and loaded.

    26. DM

      And then let's face it, I mean, the whole thing, then you do start to question, you know, like, well, is this cartoon that funny-

    27. JR

      Right. (laughs)

    28. DM

      And so on.

    29. JR

      Yeah.

    30. DM

      And that, that's what they actually have done at Charlie Hebdo. They have, um, they did it a while ago, say, "Look, we're, we're not gonna keep doing this."

  9. 51:431:00:58

    Religious literacy gaps, mythic perfection, and radicalization/deradicalization

    1. JR

      How many people do you think read it? How many people do you think read the Bible? Like, if you had to, like, guess-

    2. DM

      There are those-

    3. JR

      ... the number of Christians in this country is probably-

    4. DM

      There are those tests, aren't there? They sometimes do, the Humanist Society in UK-

    5. JR

      Yeah.

    6. DM

      ... did a few years ago asking very basic questions-

    7. JR

      Mm-hmm.

    8. DM

      ... of self-professed Christians about their knowledge of the texts and very few, like, I think-

    9. JR

      My favorite is self-professed Christians with religious tattoos. Like, "Hey, man, you gotta read the whole book."

    10. DM

      (laughs)

    11. JR

      (laughs) Like, you, you are literally showing-

    12. DM

      Right.

    13. JR

      ... on your skin-

    14. DM

      Right.

    15. JR

      ... that you didn't read the whole book.

    16. DM

      Right. Didn't pay attention in the early bits.

    17. JR

      It says don't do that.

    18. DM

      Yeah. (laughs)

    19. JR

      (laughs)

    20. DM

      This is Leviticus. Is it, is it Leviticus that's, uh, that's got the implications against writing on skin, I think?

    21. JR

      I believe so. I believe so.

    22. DM

      I think if you read Leviticus, there's a heck of a lot you can't do if you, if you-

    23. JR

      Yeah.

    24. DM

      ... if you go down Leviticus, I think.

    25. JR

      I can't wear two pieces of different cloth.

    26. DM

      Yes. Exactly.

    27. JR

      Yeah.

    28. DM

      Leviticus.

    29. JR

      Leviticus is a wonderful book.

    30. DM

      It's got be... It's very good for the mohawks, yeah.

  10. 1:00:581:08:51

    Dawkins, Al Jazeera, and the real boundaries of criticism

    1. JR

      (exhales) One of the weirdest conversations that I ever saw anybody have with someone who was a believer, um, was, uh, Dawkins, I think it was-

    2. DM

      Oh, yeah.

    3. JR

      ... was, uh, having a conversation with someone and he asked him point-blank whether or not he believed that Muhammad split the moon.

    4. DM

      Oh, yes. I think I know this was with a, a very close enemy of mine called Mehdi Hasan, who, uh, worked for Al Jazeera and who Richard Dawkins did a interview with, and I think he... That's right, he fluffed something earlier on, uh, Dawkins, he, that he didn't take him on then, he took him on on this. That's right.

    5. JR

      Mm-hmm.

    6. DM

      And I think that Hasan said yes-

    7. JR

      Yes.

    8. DM

      ... didn't he?

    9. JR

      He said yes.

    10. DM

      And then... And then it led to this terrible problem, which is, uh, really interesting, interesting problem of our era, which is that then Dawkins said, "I can't believe that somebody..." Or said afterwards, "I can't believe that somebody could be a working journalist and believe that, you know, Muhammad flew to the moon on a half-human horse."

    11. JR

      Right. (laughs)

    12. DM

      Um, (laughs) and, uh, of course, I mean, there's a, there's a, uh, interesting point there.

    13. JR

      Yeah.

    14. DM

      But of course, we do, quite rightly, allow people to believe bizarre and insane things-

    15. JR

      Well, sure-

    16. DM

      ... of that ilk.

    17. JR

      ... in Christianity. It's filled with bizarre things.

    18. DM

      And... Exactly. And if we started saying you can't have public office or work in journalism if you profess to be of this particular faith, then, well, we wouldn't get anywhere, we wouldn't have anyone left, and so...

    19. JR

      How does the story go? Muhammad flew to the moon on a half-human horse?

    20. DM

      Yeah.

    21. JR

      And split the moon with a sword? Is that what he did?

    22. DM

      Yeah, I can't remember. He could've then been attacked by female bears, but I can't remember. (laughs)

    23. JR

      (laughs)

    24. DM

      No, I can't... Yes, he... It's the night journey which is, uh, uh, central.

    25. JR

      And how did the moon get glued back together again?

    26. DM

      Oh, I don't... Is it glued back together?

    27. JR

      It looks like it is. I haven't looked close.

    28. DM

      (laughs)

    29. JR

      Maybe I need to pay more attention.

    30. DM

      (exhales) Yeah.

  11. 1:08:511:17:23

    Terror attacks, media responsibility, and Europe’s accumulating trauma

    1. DM

      I, uh, I have a, I, I, I second to no one in my gloominess about some of the things that we're gonna go through in Britain and Europe in the coming years, but, um, I recently had a reason to be even more gloomy about one aspect of it relating to this, which is this. We had, uh, three big bad terrorist attacks last year in, uh, in the UK, including the Manchester Arena bomb, where 22 young people were blown up on a Monday night for going to hear Ariana Grande. Um, and a- after the third of those attacks, which was on London Bridge when, uh, three people who were actually known to the authorities, as they generally are, uh, slashed people's throats on the street and ran to Borough Market as people were drinking, and, like, stabbed people while shouting, "This is for Allah." After the third of those attacks, it was, it felt like, "Oh, God, is this, is this really just gonna keep happening? What are we gonna do about it and what can we do?" And after the Manchester one in particular, there was this kind of thing of everyone sang, apart from John Lennon's Imagine, there was Oasis hit, Don't Look, Don't Look Back in Anger. And these themes, I was like, we weren't meant to think anything other than that. We weren't meant to be angry in any way. And, uh, then, then just a terrible thing happened from another direction. Uh, outside Finsbury Park Mosque, which is a mosque with a very troubled and bad history, um, in London. Uh, um, a guy from Wales in a van drives into the crowds as they're milling around outside the mosque, kills one man and injures a number of others. Uh, that guy, by the way, just to show how complex all this can get, is, uh, he was tried and found guilty last month in the courts in the UK. Uh, he, uh, he had been... He was obviously very mentally deranged and he had a history of mental illness and all that sort of thing, as very often people do in these situations, but he, uh, he had watched a BBC drama called Three Girls, which is the first time that the BBC had really addressed the issue of the Rotherham, uh, Rochdale rape gangs that happened in the last decade in the UK, which is still a sore that's going on, where about 1,500 girls in one town alone were basically, uh, abused by, uh, gangs of Muslim, mainly Pakistani men. And it's a very, very ugly business, partly because it was so awful that nobody, that nobody at the state or the police level or anything else wanted to look into it, and they are now. The government inquiry said that they, they didn't look into it because they were worried about being called racist and Islamophobic and so on. The press did a lot of not being interested in this as well. Eventually, after all these years, the BBC makes a documentary called Three Girls about three of the girls who suffered from these rape gangs, and then a man in Wales sees it and gets so enraged, people say at the local pub he was railing against the bloody Muslims and all this sort of thing, and then he hires a van and drives into a crowd of people outside a mosque. And you have this awful feeling that the BBC didn't want to deal with the issue that the program was about for years because it was so awful and ugly and sounded like something made up by some kind of nativist racist, you know, so it's had everything. Um, and then they do, and then it turns out a member of the public sees it and drives a van into a crowd. Yeah, I mean, you know, this, this sort of couldn't get more complex in a way. So, and I thought after that, "Okay, maybe, maybe the, maybe the BBC were right. Maybe they shouldn't, maybe they should cover up the gang rape of 1,500 girls. Maybe the public can't cope with it."

    2. JR

      (laughs)

    3. DM

      "Maybe they will get into vans." Now, as it happens, I know the British public, I think, fairly well, and I think that that guy in Wales is a very, very unusual figure. I don't think it's very common, I don't think everyone's gonna do that. I don't think we're all like that wicked madman. But I don't know. I mean, I don't know for sure everywhere, I don't know what the, I don't know what would happen in this country or in various other countries if there were three attacks like that in quick succession. I don't know. But i- this is, this is really...This is gonna get complex.

    4. JR

      It's already complex. And th- the response to it is complex, too. Wh- how do you, how do you, if you, if you are a journalist, if you are, um, a television channel-

    5. DM

      Mm-hmm.

    6. JR

      ... how, how do you report on this?

    7. DM

      Yeah.

    8. JR

      Do you think about the responsibility of alerting someone-

    9. DM

      Right.

    10. JR

      ... to these actual real atrocities that's gonna force them to react on innocent people that did nothing in front of this mosque?

    11. DM

      Yeah.

    12. JR

      The, the fact that these people in this mosque are somehow or another connected-

    13. DM

      Right.

    14. JR

      ... to these people that did these horrible crimes just by virtue of the fact they're in the same religion-

    15. DM

      Yeah.

    16. JR

      ... that's insane, too.

    17. DM

      Yeah.

    18. JR

      It's all insane.

    19. DM

      It's, uh, uh, I mean, it seems to me the only, the only way through it is to say First of all, I, I, I mean, I don't... I, I read the American press all the time, and I think that it's, it's worse than the British press in, in, in that self-appointed role of believing its task is to stand between the public and the facts, you know, and sort of negotiate between the two, uh, see what they think the public can cope with or should know, and then feed them that. Um, i- i- the American press seems to me to be rife with that, that temptation, a- as ours is. But it seems to be the only way around this is, is to not, not give into that and to try just to publish the facts when they happen, because it's just obviously seems to be much wor- We, we always know in political scandal what's worse, the cover-up. It's always the cover-up.

    20. JR

      Right.

    21. DM

      And that, that may be the case with all this. Maybe, maybe the, the argument for just the papers explaining stuff that's happened is... maybe that's, maybe that's all they can do, and that it, one could just say to them, "It'll be a lot worse if you bottle this up, because otherwise people will get the idea that there is some conspiracy to cover over certain stories, and, and they'll be onto something."

    22. JR

      And in fact, if you think about the millions of people that must have seen that, this story on the rape of 1500-

    23. DM

      Mm-hmm.

    24. JR

      ... the fact that only one person responded that way-

    25. DM

      Right.

    26. JR

      ... is pretty extraordinary in and of itself.

    27. DM

      Yes. Yes. I, I, I would've... And I would have thought on some of this... I mean, you know, I don't know. Again, I mean, there are... uh, there are lots of examples one could use, but, uh, when something bad happens like the Manchester Arena attack, uh, I'm, I'm amazed in a way that people are so decent. I mean, I'm so pleased they are. But they... we really, we don't go out looking for people to attack. You know, the, the, the public, certainly in Britain, I can happily say, and I think it's the same in America, the public... we're not really lynch mobs waiting to be got going again.

    28. JR

      Right.

    29. DM

      But the expectation that we are is the only possibility of creating us in such a way. Um, it's only by treating us as if we can't deal with ugly things that go on that you could see the situation, it's where we began, th- to see the situation in which that all goes wrong in that different way.

Episode duration: 1:56:17

Install uListen for AI-powered chat & search across the full episode — Get Full Transcript

Transcript of episode rBp4afbDeLk

Get more out of YouTube videos.

High quality summaries for YouTube videos. Accurate transcripts to search & find moments. Powered by ChatGPT & Claude AI.