Skip to content
The Joe Rogan ExperienceThe Joe Rogan Experience

Joe Rogan Experience #1242 - Tim Pool

Tim Pool is an independent journalist. His work can currently be found at http://timcast.com and on his YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCG749Dj4V2fKa143f8sE60Q

Joe RoganhostTim PoolguestGuestguest
Feb 9, 20192h 52mWatch on YouTube ↗

EVERY SPOKEN WORD

  1. 0:013:29

    Rogan revisits Jack Dorsey episode and why deplatforming matters

    1. JR

      Three, two, one. Hello, Tim.

    2. TP

      How's it going?

    3. JR

      Uh, thanks for finally being here.

    4. TP

      (laughs) Yeah.

    5. JR

      Uh, long story, right?

    6. TP

      Oh, yeah.

    7. JR

      Uh, I definitely drank too much coffee before we get here, so if I appear, appear like cracked out, I sw- I swear to God I'm not on pills. But, uh-

    8. TP

      Glad to hear it.

    9. JR

      But, um, so we had a nice conversation on the phone about deplatforming and social media. And, um, one, what was very obvious to me in talking to you was that you're way more schooled on this than I am. So that's why I wanted to have this conversation with you-

    10. TP

      Right on.

    11. JR

      ... because-

    12. TP

      Yeah.

    13. JR

      ... part of what was ... Like, I've re-listened to my podcast with Jack and, um, you had a good criticism of it. I agree with a lot of what you said. First of all, I agree that it was kinda boring.

    14. TP

      Yeah.

    15. JR

      And it was, I think, in many, for many reasons it was my fault. Uh, I don't think I prepared enough for it, and I also don't think I understood the magnitude of how other people felt about deplatforming on Twitter and, uh, in all social media, YouTube and all these different things, and what the ramifications are and how y- how much this means to people to have very clear and obviou- obvious free speech outside of very egregious examples of like threats and doxxing and things like that.

    16. TP

      Right, right. I-

    17. JR

      Which I think we can all agree, right?

    18. TP

      I think this problem might be one of the, like, one of the worst problems we're facing right now politically.

    19. JR

      Yes.

    20. TP

      You know, the Twitter is where public discourse is happening. It's where journalists are, and this is a problem, sourcing a lot of their stories.

    21. JR

      Yes.

    22. TP

      So if you have somebody who's completely removed from public discourse, that, that, that's exile.

    23. JR

      Yeah.

    24. TP

      You know? I can, I can imagine why some people kinda lose their minds when that happens.

    25. JR

      And, um, I think going into that conversation with him, well, that's what I wanted it to be. That's why I don't really interview people. You know, I kinda have conversations with them.

    26. TP

      Yeah.

    27. JR

      Occasionally we have disagreements and we, you know, we talk about things, and you know ... But it's not ... I don't have a, a, like a mandate. My only con- The, the only thing I wanted to get out of the conversation is I wanted to find out what it was like to start that organization and to have no idea when you were doing it that it was going to be essentially like one of the most important distribution at- uh, re- avenues for information.

    28. TP

      An act- an activist buddy, an activist buddy of mine asked me if I knew why people smash windows, smash Starbucks. It's not because they think they're gonna cause damage. It's because they wanna strike a symbol down of something they view oppresses them.

    29. JR

      Mm-hmm.

    30. TP

      Jack Dorsey is that symbol to a lot of people.

  2. 3:294:08

    Trusting (or not trusting) Jack Dorsey: 'Conduct' vs 'content' enforcement

    1. TP

      I don't believe any of it.

    2. JR

      You don't?

    3. TP

      I don't trust that guy, not at all.

    4. JR

      Okay.

    5. TP

      Um, you know-

    6. JR

      Why don't you trust him?

    7. TP

      I mean, first of all, there's the obvious thing that he's running these, a bunch of companies.

    8. JR

      Right.

    9. TP

      I, I, I could be wrong, but I believe he actually left Twitter. He wasn't the CEO for a while. They brought him back in or something. But it either sounds like-

    10. JR

      We should probably check on that and see if that's-

    11. TP

      Yeah, yeah.

    12. JR

      ... that's true.

    13. TP

      You know, I, I, I try to avoid asserting things that I'm not 100% sure on, but ...

    14. JR

      Me too, but I do it all the time anyway.

    15. TP

      Right, right.

    16. JR

      (laughs)

    17. TP

      Uh, Jack says things like, he said to you, he said to Congress, I believe he, he said to Congress, um, "We don't ban people based on the content. We ban people based on their conduct."

    18. JR

      Yes.

    19. TP

      Okay. You, you ha- you literally have a, a terms of service that ban specific content.

    20. JR

      Mm-hmm.

  3. 4:088:39

    Case study: Meghan Murphy, misgendering rules, and ideological bias

    1. TP

      Like, what do you mean you don't ban people based on content? There's a ... You know, I'll, I'll, I'll just get into naming some people, right? Meghan Murphy, for example, is a feminist.

    2. JR

      Who's Meghan Murphy? Is she ... Okay. She's that woman that the, the whole issue with, uh-

    3. TP

      Men Aren't Women.

    4. JR

      ... Ame- Men Right, right.

    5. TP

      So, so here, here's- this is what- this is what's important. She was responding to somebody.

    6. JR

      Please explain that for-

    7. TP

      Yeah, yeah, yeah.

    8. JR

      ... so this could be standalone, because we talked about it yesterday with Sam Harris, but ...

    9. TP

      Um, so I, I don't know too much about Meghan Murphy, but she's a feminist. She's a, what they call a trans-exclusionary radical feminist, but I think that that might be offensive.

    10. JR

      It says, "Let's remember why Jack Dorsey was fired as Twitter CEO." He was fired?

    11. TP

      Oh, there you go.

    12. JR

      Okay. Well, well, let's see what it says.

    13. TP

      2008.

    14. JR

      This is in Fortune. 2008?

    15. TP

      Yeah.

    16. JR

      That was ... There wasn't even a ... Was there a Twitter-

    17. TP

      Yeah. Yeah. I think there was.

    18. JR

      ... in 2008? Jesus Christ. Um, "Dorsey's management was so problematic, Twitter's board fired ..." This is an opinion piece. "Fired him in 2008, offering him a passive chairman role and silent board seat. 2010, he was founding square, square ... He went rogue." Okay. So something happened.

    19. TP

      You know, you know, it's funny as you called it an opinion piece, but do they?

    20. JR

      I don't know.

    21. TP

      That's, that's where we're at in journalism today.

    22. JR

      Well, when someone said ... Well, it has to be an opinion piece when someone says it was so problematic, right? I mean, that's an opinion. I mean-

    23. TP

      Sure.

    24. JR

      ... the real, the real facts are he was fired. You know, you could state the specific reason that was stated by the company, and that would be a non-opinion piece.

    25. TP

      Right.

    26. JR

      But as soon as you flavor it-

    27. TP

      Yeah, it's ... It's all opinion.

    28. JR

      Right. It is, right?

    29. TP

      Yeah.

    30. JR

      That is a c- That is an issue, right? With information, the distribution of information that's flavored by opinion and ideology.

  4. 8:3911:37

    Political labels, 'alt-right adjacent,' and why slogans replace arguments

    1. JR

      ... I should point out before we go any further, before you get called alt-right, you ve- you're very left, right?

    2. TP

      Um, I, you know, I typically say center left.

    3. JR

      Center left.

    4. TP

      Like, uh, oh God, people were saying, "How many time-" someone commented, "How many times will Tim mention he's a social liberal?" Like-

    5. JR

      Mm-hmm.

    6. TP

      ... I'm center left. Uh, I was a big fan of Bernie, you know, uh, Bernie Sanders. He's still one of my favorite politicians. Uh, people then call me a socialist. You know, conservatives call me left, left calls me right, whatever, you know?

    7. JR

      It's, these labels are so fucking toxic.

    8. TP

      Yeah.

    9. JR

      It's so confusing to people, and it, and it causes so much, so much division between two sides that might not even differ that much.

    10. TP

      You know, the funny thing about it is, I got my start during Occupy Wall Street, and conservatives called me far left, because I was reporting on the protests, what they were doing, police brutality-

    11. JR

      Right.

    12. TP

      ... the arrests. They said, "This is a far left activist." Now that I'm ... And I, I've always been critical of the more extreme factions. Like I've got interviews from seven, you know, six, seven years ago where I'm critical of these people. Now all of a sudden they're accusing me of being alt-right-

    13. JR

      Yeah.

    14. TP

      ... for being critical of extremists in masks, you know, starting fires and things like that.

    15. JR

      Or alt-right adjacent, that's my new favorite.

    16. TP

      Yeah, boot licker, alt-right adjacent.

    17. JR

      Ooh, boot licker.

    18. TP

      Boot licker. That's, that's ... You know, there's a lot of phrases that people use that mean literally nothing.

    19. JR

      Boot licking.

    20. TP

      Um, one of, one of my favorites is, to keep in the context of Twitter, they say freedom of speech, freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequence. That literally doesn't mean anything. It literally means nothing.

    21. JR

      Yeah, well that's just trying to skirt around freedom of speech. That's what that is.

    22. TP

      So what ends up happening-

    23. JR

      But, but you agree with that, like you should be able to speak your mind but you, there's certain consequences to certain things that you say.

    24. TP

      If I throw this bottle at the wall, there's a consequence. Well, that's if I-

    25. JR

      Well, that's a physical moosh- motion.

    26. TP

      If I drink this water, there's a consequence, I'll have to go to the bathroom.

    27. JR

      Right.

    28. TP

      So to say, to, to point out that actions have consequence is not actually addressing any of the issues. It's-

    29. JR

      Right.

    30. TP

      ... it's just literally saying nothing. But it's, it's, it's almost, it's just like a, you can predict when someone will say it, and it's usually when a, a specific person is banned they'll say freedom of speech, freedom of consequence, all that stuff.

  5. 11:3717:29

    Selective enforcement on Twitter: Milo, verification badges, and Assange

    1. TP

      Absolutely. Um, but then I'd have to ... The, the reason why I don't think it was a mistake very simply is, for one, we can see the ideological bent to their rules. But then you look at someone like Milo Yiannopoulos. Like, I'm not a fan of Milo. I have to make sure like everybody knows that. But just because I'm critical of the actions taken against him doesn't mean I support him. But why was he banned? 'Cause he tweeted at Leslie Jones?

    2. JR

      Right. And the idea was that his tweet caused his fans to attack her, which I think is, that's a stretch.

    3. TP

      That's, that's, that's just, that's just ridiculous.

    4. JR

      He, he didn't say go get her. He didn't-

    5. TP

      No, he didn't.

    6. JR

      ... say attack her.

    7. TP

      He was just tweeting at her.

    8. JR

      And, yeah, and you know, what did he call her? Ugly? Did he say something like that?

    9. TP

      He was in- he was insulting her. I think he called her ugly.

    10. JR

      Well, he was, he was mocking this feminist version of Ghostbusters.

    11. TP

      Right.

    12. JR

      That's what he was doing. He was talking ... It was like a critique of the movie.Look, I, I've had Milo on the podcast way back in the day. I had him on twice. I enjoy talking to him. He's hilarious. He's very smart, he's very witty. He's a character. He's very much a provocateur.

    13. TP

      Right.

    14. JR

      But he's also, you know, he's pushing buttons on purpose. Like, he's trying to get reactions from people. And-

    15. TP

      Right.

    16. JR

      Yeah.

    17. TP

      Trolling.

    18. JR

      Yeah. I mean, I almost think, like, he married a, a Black guy just to let people know he's not gay.

    19. TP

      Yeah.

    20. JR

      Or let, let people know whether he's not racist. It's-

    21. TP

      But-

    22. JR

      He's hilarious in that way.

    23. TP

      I, I, I wouldn't, I would never say something like that, but I, you know-

    24. JR

      I wouldn't say that either, but I almost think it. You know what I mean? But he's-

    25. TP

      Sure. You can understand why Milo would do that.

    26. JR

      He's calculated.

    27. TP

      Right, right.

    28. JR

      Yeah. I mean-

    29. TP

      But, but listen-

    30. JR

      But I don't think he did that. I don't think he did that. I should be clear.

  6. 17:2919:02

    Laura Loomer, public officials, and the need for transparent policy explanations

    1. TP

      So, one o- So, another, another interesting thing we can sorta segue into is, why was Laura Loomer banned? You don't have to be a fan of Laura Loomer. You can, you can question her politics.

    2. JR

      Was she banned before or after she jumped Nancy Pelosi's fence?

    3. TP

      Before.

    4. JR

      (laughs)

    5. TP

      But she's ... You know, I'll say this, man. Like, I, I, I tweeted about it. If ... Oh, God. Talking about Twitter. If you ... Even if you don't like her, you gotta admit, she knows how to get press.

    6. JR

      Yeah.

    7. TP

      She, she knows how to generate that buzz.

    8. JR

      Yeah.

    9. TP

      And, and she's d- really good at it. So ... But here's the thing. She got banned permanently because she tweeted to, I believe it was Ilhan Omar, criticism about Sharia law. She accused, uh ... I, I, I c- you know, you can pull up the tweet. But I, I, I think she accused Ilhan of promoting Sharia, which results in, like, all these horrific things, and they banned her for it. Okay. Disagree with her all you want, but that was her criticizing a politician.

    10. JR

      Mm-hmm.

    11. TP

      You can't have a lawsuit against Jo- Donald Trump claiming you can't, you know, you-... Trump can't block somebody-

    12. JR

      Right.

    13. TP

      ... because it's a public forum. But then when it comes to a Congressperson, pub- you know, just permanently ban someone for saying something critical of their ideology.

    14. JR

      And th- I think what's really critical here is that there has to be some sort of clarification for what policies were violated and how they were violated. Like that, that seems to be especially for public figures-

    15. TP

      Yeah.

    16. JR

      ... because it's one thing if we don't know a person or their background, but when you know a person, whether it's a Laura Loomer or a Milo Yiannopoulos and it's a public case, and then th- you, you get this feeling that they'll say, "No, 'cause we decide." (slams desk) And this is it.

  7. 19:0222:37

    'Learn to Code' suspensions and how journalists shape enforcement narratives

    1. TP

      Well, well, well, Joe, don't worry because no matter what Twitter does, they're going to be defended by the New York digital, you know, journalist elites who will misrepresent what's going on in an effort to obfuscate or sometimes outright lie about what's going on. And this brings me to Learn to Code.

    2. JR

      Yeah, okay. Yeah.

    3. TP

      Right.

    4. JR

      So Learn to Code. So-

    5. TP

      So-

    6. JR

      ... I asked you about this the other day-

    7. TP

      Right.

    8. JR

      ... that people are getting banned for Learn to Code. I'm like, "What the fuck is that?" Like what is that?

    9. TP

      So when coal miners were getting laid off, a bunch of articles emerged saying, "Teaching Miners to Code," "Can we teach miners how to code?" And they were showing videos about it. I don't believe it was- it wasn't intended to be, uh, derogatory or insulting, but to a lot of people it came off as this bourgeois let them eat cake. Oh, your career-

    10. JR

      Ah.

    11. TP

      ... has been destroyed? You're, you're, you're a 50-year-old man with a family? Go to Silicon Valley and do something you've never even thought about.

    12. JR

      Right.

    13. TP

      Right? Let's-

    14. JR

      Right.

    15. TP

      So it came off as, uh, to a lot of people as just elitist.

    16. JR

      Right.

    17. TP

      So when these journalists start getting laid off, this meme spreads, I don't know exactly where it started, um, where they say, "Learn to Code" to the journalists. Well, this, uh, uh, an interesting thing happens. Jon Levine, I think is his name, from TheWrap tweets, "Someone from Twitter told me, 'You will, you can, you can be banned for tweeting 'learn to code' at a laid-off journalist.'" Conservatives start tweeting it far and wide like, "Here we go. This is a reporter from TheWrap who's confirmed this." All of a sudden then other journalists can- come out and say, "This is a lie. This is not true. This is fake news. Conservatives are spreading fake news again." And they say, "We have a new up- a new statement from Twitter that said, 'We're only banning, we're only banning people who are engaging in a harassment campaign.'" Well, now you got a few problems. Is tweeting a meme at somebody critical of them a harassment campaign?

    18. JR

      Is that a meme?

    19. TP

      Uh, yeah. Right.

    20. JR

      Yeah.

    21. TP

      It's like it condenses an idea and-

    22. JR

      Right.

    23. TP

      So here's the thing. I got sent a bunch of screen- screenshots from people. Now people can fake screenshots, I understand that. Some- but, but I checked some people's Twitter accounts, I saw that they were tweeting this, and I believe for the most part this is what happened. Someone tweeted something to a BuzzFeed journalist. You know, "Oh, you guys believed X, Y, and Z. Yeah, whatever. #learntocode." Criticizing them.

    24. JR

      Mm-hmm.

    25. TP

      Suspension.

    26. JR

      (laughs)

    27. TP

      So then these, these journalists come out and say, "This is not true. It's just people engaging in a harassment campaign." So I said, "Look at this guy's account. He's got one tweet that says 'learn to code.' Is that him harassing somebody?" And they said, "Oh, but you're taking it out of context." Then Jon Levine from TheWrap says, "Update. Twitter spokesperson, who was my source, is now saying, clarifying it is about the harassment campaign." And then another journalist comes out and says, "He, his quote's fake. Twitter is denying ever saying it." But here's the thing. The editor in chief of The Daily Caller just a couple d- I think a couple days ago, took a, uh, a tweet from The Daily Show and, and he, it was this, it was, uh, uh, from The State of the Union, and he tweeted "learn to code" and quote-tweeted a video. Suspended. So it's very clearly not about a harassment campaign, but why then were all of these journalists so ready to jump up and defend Twitter when Twitter s- st- uh, you know what I said? Okay, if Twitter is claiming they're banning people who are engaging in a harassment campaign, you, you mean they've confirmed they're banning people for tweeting "learn to code," they just consider it harassment. How is it that "learn to code" is harassment but Kathy Griffin saying to all of her millions of fans, "I want these kids' names" several times, or another verified account I'm not gonna name because it's not as famous literally calling for the death of these kids and instructing people to kill them is not a bannable offense, it's not harassment campaign?

    28. JR

      Is that true?

    29. TP

      Uh, I don't wanna, I don't wanna mention the guy's name.

    30. JR

      You don't have to mention the name.

  8. 22:3752:25

    Antifa vs Proud Boys and why platform bias tracks cultural intimidation

    1. TP

      We've got the Proud Boys, all of them purged from Twitter. Okay? Say whatever you want about the Proud Boys. If they deserve to be banned, fine. Why wasn't Antifa banned? A lot of people respond to me and say, "But Tim, Antifa is random people who wear masks, you don't know." That's not true. There are branded cells of Antifa that have their own merchandise, still active. Some of these groups have published the private information of law enforcement officers, still active. No action taken against them. So, you know, I, I don't-

    2. JR

      So this, this in- indicates a heavy left-wing bias.

    3. TP

      I wouldn't necessarily say left wing. I would say intersectional, identitarian, ideological bias. Right? It's, it's, it's, it's hard to pinpoint what the tribes are in the culture war. But Twitter is clearly acting in defense of intersectional activism.

    4. JR

      Now do you think that this is a mandate? Do you think this is written somewhere? Do you think there's people who are in the company that have power that are acting independently?

    5. TP

      It's, it's, uh, grains of sand that make a heap, right? You're in s- you're in Silicon Valley. You're in a very blue area. The people who get hired tend to hold certain views. And because they all live in their own bubble, they believe they're the majority, and thus they think they're acting justly-

    6. JR

      Right.

    7. TP

      ... to ban those who are at odds with them. And this, and-

    8. JR

      Right. Social engineering.

    9. TP

      And, and this, uh, brings back into journalism the big problem. It's, you know, for decades, I don't know how long, journalism has been dominated by self-identified liberals. There's a ton of polls, I think there's a, a 2015 poll showing Republicans are like 7% of journalists or some ridiculously small number. And there's a really simple reason for it. News organizations are headquartered in big cities, the big ones. You know, CNN, even Fox News is in New York. So there's a lot of people who work at Fox News who are actually liberal. People don't seem to know that. Y- you live in New York, you're probably not a, uh, staunch conservative. So what happens then? News breaks, you've got all these journalists, 'cause I've worked with them, you know, I worked for Vice, I worked for Fusion, and they sit around at tables, they meet up after work from different offices and they talk about things and they all tell each other the exact same thing.And so this is why you see Covington happen. These people all follow each other on Twitter, so when someone tweets, "This MAGA kid got in the face of Nathan Phillips," they only see each other's tweets, and they just write it. They don't do any journalism. And it goes, it, it, man, I can't believe, for days. And-

    10. JR

      And that was even in the New York Times, correct?

    11. TP

      Yeah, yep.

    12. JR

      Yeah.

    13. TP

      The New York Times, uh-

    14. JR

      Harris talked about that yesterday.

    15. TP

      And it's, it's mind-blowing to me because the second video that came out from Covington, you literally watch Nathan Phillips walk into, up to the kid and get in his face.

    16. JR

      Yeah.

    17. TP

      Bill Maher, you know, what, four or five days later says the kid got in his face. And I'm like, "How are you-"

    18. JR

      Yeah.

    19. TP

      You know, uh, shame on Bill Maher for, for, for saying that. That's not true. But at the same time, we have a serious journalism problem, and this l- links back to Twitter. And, and-

    20. JR

      That, that story in particular really almost, like, condensed all of the problems into one event.

    21. TP

      Oh, yeah. Yeah, and what's, what's, what's fascinating is following this story, an op-ed, I believe it was in the New York Times, said, "Stop tweeting," or it said, "Never tweet." Brian Stelter from CNN then got a statement that I, I always say I believe, because I don't have the sources pulled up, but, uh, someone from Twitter said, "Journalists are the lifeblood of our platform." And so that's why I think you've got these predominantly New York-based progressive writers. They're fresh out of college. They get hired for, you know, moderate salaries to work in a newsroom, sit around each other all day, sharing the same ideas, not exploring anything outside their bubble. And Twitter supports them because they're the ones who drive traffic to Twitter. They keep the conversation going, and I think that's where Twitter's bias partly comes from. The other is that clearly you're in San Francisco, you're gonna have, you know, your, your staff, the people who are, who are, you know, running content, uh, curation, and banning people, they lean left. So why, why, uh, Kathy Griffin wasn't banned? Probably because she's, she's very famous. But then I have to wonder why Alex Jones was. So you, you, the only, the only real differentiator there, I guess, is either mainstream notoriety or ideological tribe.

    22. JR

      Well, w- Jamie, you pulled up why Alex was banned too, which is, you know, it's not very clear. That like when, when you think about the fact that they were saying that he had never done anything on their platform that was bannable, and then what was the one final thing? Like, and Jack didn't know what it was.

    23. TP

      He, he got in... He confronted Oliver Darcy of CNN, uh, in DC and for several minutes was yelling at him while they filmed. And apparently, that's my understanding, was the justification for banning him, that he was harassing a journalist or something to that effect, which is, in my opinion, absurd. And, and, I, I-

    24. JR

      W- was he doing it on Twitter?

    25. TP

      Um, I guess they post it to Twitter.

    26. GU

      Peris- he did this live on Periscope, which is a Twitter-

    27. TP

      There you- there you go. Yeah.

    28. GU

      ... Twitter-owned platform.

    29. JR

      So if you do something on Periscope, they could get you banned from Twitter?

    30. TP

      Well, that's the same thing.

  9. 52:251:11:01

    The 'OK' hand sign panic: 4chan hoaxes, intent, and moral hysteria

    1. TP

      But I'll take this opportunity to segue into another point when it comes to the bias, right?

    2. JR

      Uh-huh.

    3. TP

      How is it that you can have Jimmy Kimmel, Jimmy Fallon dress in blackface on their-

    4. JR

      When?

    5. TP

      Uh, CNN made a big list. I don't know exactly when it happened. I think, uh-

    6. JR

      (laughs)

    7. TP

      ... Kimmel was on The Man Show. He dressed like a basketball player.

    8. JR

      Oh, Jesus.

    9. TP

      And Jimmy Fallon dressed like Chris Rock.

    10. JR

      Oh, Jesus.

    11. TP

      Sarah Silverman did it. She-

    12. JR

      Yes.

    13. TP

      I think she addressed it though.

    14. JR

      Yes.

    15. TP

      Everybody ... No- nobody loses their minds. Nobody loses their minds over that.

    16. JR

      Because they're on the left, you think?

    17. TP

      I don't know. I don't know. It's, it's ... I, I ... Honestly, I would say to an extent there's probably some kind of tribal bias.

    18. JR

      Well, I think when you're going back to high school yearbooks looking for outrage from 55-year-old people-

    19. TP

      You've, you've lost the plot.

    20. JR

      ... you've lost the plot.

    21. TP

      Isn't that, isn't that crazy?

    22. JR

      It's fucking insane.

    23. TP

      Well, what's, what's crazier is when Kathy Griffin tweets out that the three-pointer hand sign at a Covington basketball game was a Nazi hand gesture. Like, the three-pointer. You know what the three-pointer sign is?

    24. JR

      Oh, this thing?

    25. TP

      Yep.

    26. JR

      Yeah. Okay.

    27. TP

      See, I'm not gonna do it because the photos will go flying.

    28. JR

      It's just- okay. I-

    29. TP

      People send me death threats.

    30. JR

      Look, I have- I put a series of them on my Instagram when I found out about that.

Episode duration: 2:52:05

Install uListen for AI-powered chat & search across the full episode — Get Full Transcript

Transcript of episode 02ux1dKNPXo

Get more out of YouTube videos.

High quality summaries for YouTube videos. Accurate transcripts to search & find moments. Powered by ChatGPT & Claude AI.