Skip to content
The Joe Rogan ExperienceThe Joe Rogan Experience

Joe Rogan Experience #1311- David Pakman

David Pakman is a television & radio host, political commentator, and YouTube personality. He is the host of the internationally syndicated political television and talk radio program The David Pakman Show. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCvixJtaXuNdMPUGdOPcY8Ag

Joe RoganhostDavid Pakmanguest
Jun 6, 20192h 5mWatch on YouTube ↗

EVERY SPOKEN WORD

  1. 0:0015:00

    Hello, David. Here we…

    1. JR

      Hello, David. Here we go. We're live.

    2. DP

      We're, uh, we're doing it.

    3. JR

      Yes, we're doing it. What's going on, man?

    4. DP

      I'm nervous. I'm nervous.

    5. JR

      Oh, don't be. Uh, I enjoy your show. I really do.

    6. DP

      Thank you.

    7. JR

      It's a pleasure to watch. Um, you, you're a very smart guy, man. You... And like I said, we were just talking about it, you're very reasonable. In this world, I think there's so much of this, uh, the YouTube political world, the YouTube commentary world, where people are so fucking toxic. You know, there's, there's so much negativity, there's so much what they call dunking on people.

    8. DP

      Mm.

    9. JR

      There's so much dunking. You do a little dunking, but-

    10. DP

      Some of it's warranted.

    11. JR

      It is warranted, yes.

    12. DP

      Yeah.

    13. JR

      But I don't know if it's beneficial.

    14. DP

      Uh, to the, to the people doing the dunking?

    15. JR

      Yes. Or even to the cause. I think it is temporarily... Well, sometimes it's good because it, it, it show-... It mocks people's positions and it makes people realize, "Yeah, that is a ridiculous position." So if you're on the fence or if you're not really quite sure how you feel about things and you see someone get mocked for a ridiculous position that maybe you've even shared for a little bit-

    16. DP

      Right.

    17. JR

      ... maybe, maybe you haven't explored it deeply, and you see someone who has explored it deeply sort of expose all the flaws in this line of thinking, it's good. But my thing... When I'm... I... And I, I interview a lot of people on the right and a lot of people on the left, and I just hate all this conflict that I, I'd say the unnecessary conflict I think is when you, when you watch television today and you see Antifa fighting with, uh, you know, B- Trump supporters and all this, all this weird conflict, I don't, I don't necessarily think that most of it is, is necessary.

    18. DP

      Necessary? Well, I think the devil's in the details.

    19. JR

      Yeah.

    20. DP

      So, like, as an example, if you want to bring together, I don't know, people who are on oppor- oppos- opposite sides of the climate debate, for example.

    21. JR

      Good luck.

    22. DP

      Um, sure. Right. Well, why is... Par- part of that, you could argue, is if one side just does not accept science-

    23. JR

      Right.

    24. DP

      ... how can you really bring those people together? It doesn't mean you need physical conflict to resolve it. In fact, I completely agree with you, the physical conflict is totally counterproductive. But at a certain point on some issues, I understand why there's, like, an intractability to the debate where it seems completely impossible to move forward because whichever side you're on, I would argue that I'm on the right side of these issues and others would disagree.

    25. JR

      Mm-hmm.

    26. DP

      When you're far apart in a way that you can't even agree as to, like, what the starting point facts are about the conversation-

    27. JR

      Right.

    28. DP

      ... how do you even s-... How do you start? I have some ideas as to how I try to do it, but it's very tough.

    29. JR

      It is very tough. I just don't think dunking on people always, like constantly shitting on people-

    30. DP

      Mm.

  2. 15:0030:00

    Yeah. …

    1. JR

    2. DP

      Yeah.

    3. JR

      Like, how did he become... How did he come to prominence?

    4. DP

      I don't know the sequence, but I think he had a we- an alt-right website that had articles of some kind, and then, um, he... that website became more known and-

    5. JR

      That fucking term is so talk... The- the... Alt-right, you know, alt-left, the centrist. Like, all these-

    6. DP

      Yeah.

    7. JR

      ... all these different labels are so-

    8. DP

      I'd rather talk about issues. I agree with you there.

    9. JR

      Yeah. It's so clunky.

    10. DP

      But so, you know, first thing was, I did wanna interview him, but if I had felt that I wouldn't be prepared to make it abundantly clear that I don't agree with the guy-

    11. JR

      Right.

    12. DP

      ... and I think his ideas are terrible, I wouldn't have done the interview.

    13. JR

      Right, right, right.

    14. DP

      So, the problem I had with the critiques from the left of me doing that, some who said, "The last thing we need to be doing is giving this guy a voice," that's often how they say it, or "a platform," my response was, "This guy's getting interviewed in lots of other places that aren't even challenging him."

    15. JR

      Right.

    16. DP

      "I'm at least making an attempt here to get something in the record that there are arguments against these ideas, these are bad ideas, and I don't want to be part of the diffusion of just the ideas themselves. I'm gonna be pushing back."

    17. JR

      I'm gonna have to watch that. I'm gonna have to watch that now. Now, when you did do that, like, what was his response? Was-

    18. DP

      During the interview?

    19. JR

      What was his response to your pushback?

    20. DP

      Uh, I mean, he had answers.

    21. JR

      Yeah.

    22. DP

      You know, he's- he's- he was well-prepared.

    23. JR

      Mm-hmm.

    24. DP

      I- I don't know if they're- they were unique or new arguments that I was making, um, but there was no argument to be made that I was letting him just parrot white nationalist-

    25. JR

      Mm-hmm.

    26. DP

      ... talking points unopposed, which I wouldn't- I just wouldn't feel good about that.

    27. JR

      Right.

    28. DP

      It's not how I do interviews.

    29. JR

      Yeah. And then the- the left was upset that you were giving him, air quotes, "a platform."

    30. DP

      A very small portion of the left.

  3. 30:0045:00

    Oh, I see. Okay.…

    1. JR

      engineering.

    2. DP

      Oh, I see. Okay.

    3. JR

      He, he went to school for audio engineering. By the time he got out, it was all useless.

    4. DP

      No, but, but that was not a four-year bachelor's program, right?

    5. NA

      It is now.

    6. DP

      Oh, it is now. Okay.

    7. NA

      Yeah. I, when I went there, it wasn't available for that. But since then, they have made that available and that's also in the time that YouTube has made basically education free for a lot of people.

    8. DP

      Sure.

    9. NA

      So.

    10. DP

      I mean, I think with that, the, uh, the issue is, in my mind, um, that when you...... consider the cost relative to the earnings potential. As you pointed out, when you talk about-

    11. JR

      Yeah.

    12. DP

      ... $68,000 a year or, you know, I-

    13. JR

      Whatever it is, yeah.

    14. DP

      ... I guest taught at Boston College, and I think it was, like, 64,000 all in- something like that. Um, depending on what field you're going into, it's- it's almost impossible to pay that off, ever.

    15. JR

      Yeah.

    16. DP

      So some- at some point, something needs to change.

    17. JR

      Yeah.

    18. DP

      And this kind of gets us into the technological automa- uh, automation-

    19. JR

      Mm-hmm.

    20. DP

      ... and unemployment stuff of what happens as computers and technology start to replace jobs. And that's where I think there's a pretty clear line between a free market capitalist, a social democrat, like myself, and actual socialism, like what should happen with the gains that come from those technological advancements.

    21. JR

      Mm-hmm.

    22. DP

      But as far as the education piece is concerned, s- s- it- it's completely unsustainable, the way it is now.

    23. JR

      I knew about you before this happened, but then I really kind of got on board with you when someone was trying to get you fired from-

    24. DP

      Mm-hmm.

    25. JR

      ... Boston University. And I remember, I-

    26. DP

      Boston College.

    27. JR

      Boston College, sorry. And I Tweeted it and I was like-

    28. DP

      Right.

    29. JR

      ... like, "What? What is this? This is craziness."

    30. DP

      Yeah. So it's a woman named Amy Ciskind, who I don't know other than that incident, where-

  4. 45:001:00:00

    ... and just say…

    1. DP

      say.

    2. JR

      ... and just say that it didn't violate the terms of services.

    3. DP

      Right. Right.

    4. JR

      And then today, as I got in here, Jamie informed me that they made a decision to demonetize him.

    5. DP

      That's right.

    6. JR

      (laughs)

    7. DP

      So, in the article where they made the decision not to act, they actually put what YouTube's terms of service are with regard to bullying and harassment. My reading of it, and we could go through them, if we could pull them up, we could go through it line by line if we wanted. My reading was that the, that definitely did break the terms and conditions. That was my view as I looked at what it was that was done by Steven Crowder and what the terms of service are. Just matching it up, not looking at the comments from either person.

    8. JR

      What, what was it specifically?

    9. DP

      It was, um, specifically targeting an individual on the basis of sexual orientation.

    10. JR

      But he wasn't targeting him on the basis of it. He was mentioning that... with his bad ideas. He was targeting his bad ideas in regards to antifa.

    11. DP

      A lot of the-

    12. JR

      That he was dismissing Antifa, but if you look at Crowder's video, and I, I can't believe I spent so much time doing this.

    13. DP

      Yeah.

    14. JR

      But I spent like a whole hour on this two days ago.

    15. DP

      Yep.

    16. JR

      Um, he was talking about how Carlos just dismisses Antifa as being not that big a deal, and that there's bias in the media whenever there's anything negative that happens.

    17. DP

      Sure.

    18. JR

      But if you look at the overall picture, and then Crowder goes on to talk about all the assaults, all the murders, that there were sexual assaults, there was rapes, there was all these things that happened with Antifa. He was talking about all these different people that got maced in the face.

    19. DP

      Okay.

    20. JR

      All these people that got hurt. And, and he's highlighting all... Like, this is not something to easily dismiss.

    21. DP

      Sure.

    22. JR

      And that the FBI had labeled Antifa a terrorist organization.

    23. DP

      So, so far it's just politics. It's just what does, what does he think, what do I think? So far-

    24. JR

      It's just that part of it.

    25. DP

      Yeah.

    26. JR

      And along the way, he's like, "Yeah, but the queer little Latino says this."

    27. DP

      Yeah.

    28. JR

      And when he does that, that's where it's like, okay, what is he doing? Is he mock... He's kind of mocking him, right? And he's mocking him by saying he's queer, but he says he's queer, or he says he's gay.

    29. DP

      Yeah, but that's like saying... I mean, listen, just because the N-word is in rap songs doesn't mean that, uh, any, that- that it's defined to go and-

    30. JR

      Right, but the N-word is not in like, it's not like the LBGTN. You know what I'm saying? It's not like a part of their, their organi- it's-

  5. 1:00:001:12:49

    Yes. …

    1. JR

      more regulation, but it's regulation to keep a private company from regulating against free speech. Do you see what I'm saying? It's, it's a sneaky kind of regulation. It's a regulation that's enforcing the First Amendment and the people's ability to freely express themselves. If we're admitting, or if we're agreeing that we are entering into this new world-

    2. DP

      Yes.

    3. JR

      ... where this i- I, that's my position is that it is a town square, and I, I feel like everybody should be ab- uh, able to communicate. The really unfortunate, unsavory aspect of it is when someone gets harassed, like Carlos Mesa was because of this, where people are sending him all these homophobic tweets and all th- and, I mean, he's getting text messages and all this shit. That's, that's the unsavory and unfortunate aspect of it. How do you-

    4. DP

      I mean, I think it's-

    5. JR

      ... stop that?

    6. DP

      I don't know how you stop it. I don't know exactly how you stop it, but I think it would be useful f- I mean, one thing is, when does a platform get big enough, in your mind, that it would qualify for this, like, town square designation?

    7. JR

      Well, for sure YouTube.... let's talk about that one, 'cause that's the one we're on. I mean-

    8. DP

      Okay.

    9. JR

      ... fucking goddamn it, it's huge.

    10. DP

      Okay.

    11. JR

      It's gigantic.

    12. DP

      So, are there other types of businesses through which communication happens that you think should be regulated in the same way? I'll... that's not really clear, so I'll give an example.

    13. JR

      Okay.

    14. DP

      If you start regularly sending people via UPS, uh, similar things to some of the content that exists on YouTube, and UPS says, "We're getting reports that you're sending people harassing stuff. We don't want you as a customer anymore."

    15. JR

      Here's the ques-

    16. DP

      Yeah.

    17. JR

      ... here's a question though. Isn't there a difference between someone sending something to a physical address and someone sending something, s- let's say, to you, when your social media apps are on the third page of your phone, and you have to swipe all the way over to get 'em and open it up and you have to read 'em if you wanna find them?

    18. DP

      Well-

    19. JR

      You don't necessarily have to read them.

    20. DP

      There's a difference in a practical sense, but I guess the question is would we want the government... would you similarly want the government to enforce for telephone companies? If you are harassing, getting harassing texts and you report it and report it-

    21. JR

      Tell... that's a different thing, I think. I think when it's-

    22. DP

      It's, it's different-

    23. JR

      ... coming to your phone and the phone is ringing, I, I think that's a- another step. That's another step towards invasive.

    24. DP

      It's a big gray area.

    25. JR

      Yes, it is.

    26. DP

      Is the phone ringing? Is it a phone call?

    27. JR

      Right.

    28. DP

      Is it a text? Is it-

    29. JR

      Right.

    30. DP

      ... is it a WhatsApp message?

Episode duration: 2:05:22

Install uListen for AI-powered chat & search across the full episode — Get Full Transcript

Transcript of episode VIlI-Se-pk8

Get more out of YouTube videos.

High quality summaries for YouTube videos. Accurate transcripts to search & find moments. Powered by ChatGPT & Claude AI.

Add to Chrome