Skip to content
The Joe Rogan ExperienceThe Joe Rogan Experience

Joe Rogan Experience #1682 - Jesse Singal

Jesse Singal is the author of "The Quick Fix: Why Fad Psychology Can't Cure Our Social Ills" and the cohost of the podcast "Blocked and Reported." Check out more of his stuff at jessesingal.substack.com/about.

Joe RoganhostJesse SingalguestEddie BravoguestAlex Jonesguest
Jun 27, 20243h 3mWatch on YouTube ↗

EVERY SPOKEN WORD

  1. 0:003:53

    Twitter as a mental-health hazard (and a necessary promo tool)

    1. JR

      (drumming) Joe Rogan podcast, check it out.

    2. NA

      The Joe Rogan Experience.

    3. JR

      Train by day, Joe Rogan podcast by night, all day. (rock music plays) Hello, Jesse.

    4. JS

      Hey, man. How's it going?

    5. JR

      Nice to meet you. I've, I've read your tweets multiple times.

    6. JS

      (laughs) I'm sorry to hear that.

    7. JR

      (laughs) You're a tweeter, man. You're out there. You're out there-

    8. JS

      I'm try ... I wanna-

    9. JR

      ... wai- waiting through the swamp.

    10. JS

      ... learn from you how to stay out of that shit. It's ... it destroys me.

    11. JR

      It's not for everybody to stay off. Um, uh, just I think for some people, it's a very useful tool. You know, it's very useful for ... That's how I found about you. You know?

    12. JS

      That's good.

    13. JR

      I found out about you through Twitter, so-

    14. JS

      Still worked.

    15. JR

      ... it's, um, it's great for promotion, it's great for getting your ideas out there, but it's not great for rational, kind discourse between other, you know, compassionate human beings. There's very little of that going on there. It's a lot of like ... It's like being in a mental health institute that-

    16. JS

      Well, I was gonna say, I think it ... I know people from real life who, I don't know for sure, but I think, like, being on Twitter is, is exacerbating their mental illness. I think that's how bad-

    17. JR

      100%

    18. JS

      ... it is, yeah.

    19. JR

      And during the pandemic, that was highlighted.

    20. JS

      Oh, my God. You have nothing else to do. You're just online in this cr- ... It's like a middle school cafeteria, but more sociopathic.

    21. JR

      (laughs)

    22. JS

      It's horrible.

    23. JR

      Yeah, it's just ... It's so bad for people and y- you see them unraveling as the days go on, and you just wanna go like, "Go run. Leave your phone at home and go for a run."

    24. JS

      Here's what I don't get about your ability to stay off is I, I have, you know, one a millionth, um, the notoriety of you. Some people hate me, but no, you know, I have trouble not checking in on (laughs) what people are saying about me, and that, that's what fucks you up.

    25. JR

      Mm-hmm.

    26. JS

      'Cause then you go down this spiral and you, you pretend that this, uh, angry 15-year-old in Ohio who's talking shit about you, that you can convince him you're a good guy.

    27. JR

      Mm-hmm.

    28. JS

      And that's, that's crazy 'cause he's not trying to have a conversation, but I find I can't, I can't stay away from those fights with the angry 15-year-old in Ohio.

    29. JR

      Or angry 45-year-old in Manhattan.

    30. JS

      (laughs)

  2. 3:536:19

    Purity tests, demon-making, and how Twitter sets the media agenda

    1. JS

      Well, what I'm fascinated by is these communities where you constantly have to look over your shoulders 'cause if you say the wrong thing once, you're basically out of the community. And this isn't just on the left.

    2. JR

      Ah.

    3. JS

      This actually happened on the right with Trump, where people who didn't support Trump, it was like, "Bye."

    4. JR

      Yeah. Ah, yeah.

    5. JS

      It doesn't matter you've been a good Conservative 20 years. So there was a, um, a, a sort of socialist lefty writer in New York who, like, had done all- done a lot of good stuff. She wrote a Times piece about how she met Bari Weiss and how they got along, and she's like, "I thought I would hate Bari Weiss. I like Bari Weiss." And she was basically ousted just for refusing to say Bari Weiss was like-

    6. JR

      (laughs)

    7. JS

      ... you know, Hitler's daughter or something. It's like the, the standards ... So ... All right.

    8. JR

      How is Bari Weiss ba- ... I mean, look, Bari Weiss and I have disagreed about things. She's a wonderful person. She's a sweetheart. She's very smart. She's interesting. She's a great writer.

    9. JS

      Yeah.

    10. JR

      I ... There's nothing wrong with her. She just ... People disagree about shit. Like her and I had a ... We have pretty significant disagreement about Tulsi Gabbard and, you know, so I, I love her to death. I think she's great. I just ... I don't understand why people wanna make demons out of just f- humans-

    11. JS

      Yeah.

    12. JR

      ... with normal human flaws.

    13. JS

      Well, the thing to keep in mind ... I think a lotta people make the mistake of saying like, "Oh, it's just Twitter. Why do you talk about it so much? Why do you care?" But, like, every ... Basically every mainstream journalist and a significant proportion of, like, big name academics, they're on Twitter every day.

    14. JR

      All day.

    15. JS

      And they're looking around to see who responds to what and-

    16. JR

      Yeah.

    17. JS

      ... uh, any journalist right now who says that Twitter is not setting the terms of the agenda and what we cover and how we cover it, I, I think is, like, deluded or lying. It just so clearly is, yeah.

    18. JR

      They're disingenuous. It's disingenuous. It's clearly affecting them. If they're on Twitter and they're paying attention to their atmentions, it's having an effect.

    19. JS

      Yeah.

    20. JR

      It just does. The thing about Bari that people have the hardest time with, I guess, is her pro-Israel stance, right? Is that what it is?

    21. JS

      It's a combination of things. I think it's, it's partly that, but I, I think people get most mad ... Like, people got mad at me because I wrote stuff for, like, liberalish insti- uh, The Atlantic, New York Magazine that they really disagreed with. They're not gonna bother with people who write for The National Review 'cause, like, they're Conservatives, they're a different tribe. With Bari, there was this assumption that she's, like, in our house fucking shit up, even though she's not. She's by no means, like, a far right. She's like a centrist, heterodox, whatever.

    22. JR

      She's just rational.

    23. JS

      Yeah, I mean, and I- I have disagreements with her too, but it's just ... I've never understood the, uh ...... of all the people to focus that much anger on, um, I've never quite gotten it, to be honest.

  3. 6:198:54

    Debunking the “warrior gene” clip: candidate genes, pop science, and replication

    1. JR

      Um, you were saying ... We were talking about this before, and then we agreed to stop talking about it until we got on the podcast ...

    2. JS

      (laughs)

    3. JR

      That there was a, there, I guess there's a clip going around from my podcast from years back.

    4. JS

      Yes.

    5. JR

      Where it was Charles Johnson on the podcast, where he was saying something about a gene. What, what, what is the clip, 'cause I haven't seen the clip?

    6. JS

      Yeah.

    7. JR

      I just, someone told me about it, but again, I don't pay attention to anything-

    8. JS

      So people were recirculating-

    9. JR

      ... that has to do with me.

    10. JS

      ... a clip where, uh, Johnson was saying that- (laughs) And I know people are gonna take this clip out of context. He was saying, I'm not saying, that there's a gene called MAOA associated with aggression, and that Black people have more of it. And I saw this on my Twitter feed and I hit up a friend of mine, uh, a buddy. I met him once in real life in Helsinki. His name is Amir Sariaslan. He's like a genetics researcher, great follower, follow on Twitter. Um, he studies genetics. I was like, "What's this deal?" They call it the warrior gene. The idea is if you have this gene or some variant of it, you're more aggressive. And he basically explained, there's this interesting recent history of genetics where people thought there was like a gay gene and a liberal gene-

    11. JR

      Hmm.

    12. JS

      ... and a warrior gene. These are called, um, uh, candidate gene studies. Like, what happens if you have this gene versus not have this gene?

    13. JR

      Hmm.

    14. JS

      A- at the time Johnson made this claim, there had been this, like, pretty shitty media coverage about the idea o- of a warrior gene. And a guy na- Do you know that guy, John Horgan, the science writer?

    15. JR

      No.

    16. JS

      Very smart guy. He wrote a book on, um, sort of rational mysticism, like how to, how to-

    17. JR

      Hmm.

    18. JS

      ... understand mystical experiences in scientific light. Back when, uh, back in the day, maybe 10 years ago, he did a piece for Scientific American, people should look up. John Horgan on the warrior gene, basically debunking it. But what my boy Amir told me is that it's not just that, like, these studies are bad, the candidate gene studies. Genetics research has moved in a whole different direction. They do, uh, genome-wide association studies. They realize, like, for various reasons, these studies saying there's a, a, a gay gene, a liberal gene, a warrior gene, they didn't replicate, and they think genetics is much more complicated. So they've moved toward, like, examining entire regions of our genome and trying to understand it that way. So the short version is what Johnson was saying is just sort of wrong and a misunderstanding, and this entire area of genetics has, like, sort of been debunked. Like we don't really look for candidate genes anymore. We look for whole re- regions of the genome.

    19. JR

      Were people looking for it back when he said it?

    20. JS

      Yeah, yeah. He was responding to sort of, like, just bad pop science basically.

    21. JR

      Bad pop science ...

    22. JS

      Yeah.

    23. JR

      ... from 2015.

    24. JS

      From, I think, 2011, but yeah

    25. NA

      It was a good-

    26. JR

      But when was the podcast I did with him?

    27. JS

      The clip was 2015, yeah.

    28. JR

      He, uh, was one of those guys that I didn't know anything about until I had him on.

    29. JS

      Yeah.

    30. JR

      And then when I had him on, uh, like, there was things like that where I was like, "Wait, what?"

  4. 8:5413:55

    Who gets a microphone? Platforming, responsibility, and modern deplatforming

    1. JR

      There was a whole group of people ba- And also, I should just say, when I was doing the podcast back then, I didn't sort of understand the impact that it had. I thought I was just having conversations with people, 'cause it wasn't nearly as popular back then.

    2. JS

      Yeah.

    3. JR

      So if I had s- a, a, you know, a podcast with someone whose opinions that I completely disagreed with, I'd have them on anyway. I'd just like, "See, let's see where this goes."

    4. JS

      Yeah.

    5. JR

      Just 'cause it'd maybe be interesting. May be a weird conversation to have a, a conversation with someone who's got a polar opposite view of life than I do. You know, it was a much smaller platform back then. And so I didn't think of it as a responsibility or a, like a ... I didn't think ... You know how there's a thought now that you, you shouldn't put people on. You're, you're elevating their platform.

    6. JS

      Right.

    7. JR

      Like this is the sort ... But I still kind of disagree with that because I think there's a real value in having people on that have different views than you. Even if you don't agree with them, there's a value in figuring out where they're wrong. There's a value in figuring out if maybe there's a hole in your logic, like whatever it is.

    8. JS

      Yeah.

    9. JR

      With him, there was a lot of those guys. I don't even know if that was like ... Was that pre-Milo or post-Milo I had? There was a bunch of these guys that had realized there was a movement online. And in a lot of ways, what's really interesting is, I'm very anti-censorship; however, there's no denying ... I shouldn't even say however. I'm very anti-censorship. I think it's a terrible way to behave. I think it's a terrible way to, uh, it's a terrible way to sort out the truth, to just silence people and remove people from platforms. And the idea that Twitter and Facebook and YouTube are just private companies and they can do whatever they want, I think it's bigger than that now.

    10. JS

      Yeah.

    11. JR

      I just re- I really do. I think this is, this is a, a legitimate modern day free speech issue, uh, to the point where y- there's a real argument to be made that if you're not on these platforms, you are ... you're, you're not just diminished. They've, they've silenced you in a way that changes the narrative. You, you, you don't get to see the other person's point of view. Even people that are incredibly polarizing like Trump, it's fucking amazing that they can just remove the 45th President of the United States from everything.

    12. JS

      Yeah.

    13. JR

      And he can't even communicate anymore.

    14. JS

      Yeah.

    15. JR

      You know? I mean, you could say it's because of the Capitol attack. You could say it's 'cause a lot of things, and I get your perspective, but I do not agree with silencing him.

    16. JS

      W-

    17. JR

      I just don't think ... You know, they just didn't want him to win again.

    18. JS

      Yeah.

    19. JR

      But my point was, back then all these alt-right guys were catching a lot of steam. They w- they had a lot of momentum on their side. Milo, who is a, a very charismatic, very articulate, humor- humorous guy. So he would d- do these interviews. The, uh, the right loved him. He would go on, you know, all these different talk shows and he would make fun of everything. And ev- even Bill Maher loved him.

    20. JS

      Yup.

    21. JR

      And it was interesting, right? And then there was a lot of these guys that came along that would, they would, uh, parrot alt-right talking points. And it's like, if you pay attention to online forums when they're left alone, like Reddit's a great example. They had to close down The Donald, right?

    22. JS

      Yup.

    23. JR

      Reddit decided this is just too nut. It's too nuts. It's too much. They just ... I don't, I don't agree with that either, but they stepped in because ...Shitposting is a real thing, right? And people love saying things they're not supposed to say and they love riling people up. Now, when you're a person, whether it's Charles Johnson or someone else, that finds this avenue where you can get a lot of attention-

    24. JS

      Yep.

    25. JR

      ... by stirring shit and saying things that maybe you don't even agree with, but saying things that are gonna rile up people on the left and get a bunch of shitposters and, uh, hardcore right wing people online to love you, people lean in towards that. And there was a lot of that going on. I think that's where Gavin McInnes went south, that's where Milo went south, a lot of these guys. And then once the wave of censorship came in and those guys started getting deplatformed, you see it really did have a massive impact on the culture because there was a movement, man. It was a big movement. And they essentially threw water on that movement.

    26. JS

      Do you... I, I actually, I wanna press you on one thing.

    27. JR

      Please.

    28. JS

      'Cause my, my impulse as a journalist is to ask you questions. So I... Most of your critics, the shit they say about, like, who you platform, I find ridiculous 'cause, like, often you're platforming people who are already popular. And I'm with you in that, like, if, if someone is already a big figure, they're a big figure.

    29. JR

      Yeah.

    30. JS

      All the best we can do is interrogate their beliefs. A couple times where I'm more sympathetic to your critics, one was, like, Johnson, although then I th- I saw you go back and forth with him on Twitter about the, like, this black gene violence bullshit.

  5. 13:5534:20

    Alex Jones and the harm question: entertainment, misinformation, and guardrails

    1. JS

      B- but to me there's a big difference between, like, um... You know, later on we're, we're surely gonna talk about, like, rapid-onset gender dysphoria.

    2. JR

      Mm-hmm.

    3. JS

      And, like, Abigail Shrier wrote a big bestselling book you can't deny that's part of the conversation. I think it's crazy people try, whether you agree with her or not, you can't shut that down. To me, that's, like, one subset of conversation where I'm like, you have to have those conversations. The one area where I sort of agree with your critics, um, (laughs) and I know you might not wanna talk about this guy, but, like, when you had Alex Jones on. And he's lo- there's this conspiracy theory about the governor of Virginia harvesting organs from fetuses. And it's really-

    4. JR

      When did he say that?

    5. JS

      He did on your show.

    6. JR

      Whi- which one?

    7. JS

      I think the 2019 one.

    8. EB

      It was the ni- I remem-

    9. JR

      9/11?

    10. EB

      This is when E- when Eddie came in talking about that, that voice. He had that character voice.

    11. JS

      (laughs)

    12. EB

      He's talking about, "How the little babies..." He was talking in a Southern voice. Remember that?

    13. JS

      Yeah, yeah.

    14. JR

      Hmm.

    15. EB

      That's what he was talking about, but I'll try to-

    16. JS

      But-

    17. EB

      I'll find the clip.

    18. JR

      Yeah. I d- let's see if we can find that.

    19. EB

      Yeah.

    20. JR

      'Cause that is, uh... Again, with Alex, I never know what the fuck he's gonna say.

    21. JS

      Right. Well, but that's what I'm saying. So, like, to me, the difference there is he, he's targeting, like, a human with bullshit in, like, an office building.

    22. EB

      I agree with that. Yeah.

    23. JS

      And if, if... Y- your listeners mostly understand he's an entertainer, but if like 1% of them believe this is true, you could see that causing trouble.

    24. JR

      I think he's just an entertainer. See, I, that's why I would-

    25. JS

      You think he believes that stuff or...

    26. JR

      He believes a lot of it.

    27. JS

      Yeah.

    28. JR

      Yes. And he's right about many things and he's wrong about many things.

    29. JS

      What percentage-

    30. JR

      That's the problem.

  6. 34:2036:58

    Why conspiracies thrive: real government misconduct as rocket fuel

    1. JR

      (sighs) Yeah. They're, they're both right up there. The ... He's, he's informed me of some real things, though. One of them where I didn't know about the widespread use of agent provocateurs throughout history. I really wasn't aware of that.

    2. JS

      Yeah.

    3. JR

      I wasn't aware of that. The government has an actual strategy that they use to break up peaceful protests by bringing in people who's caused violence.

    4. JS

      Yeah.

    5. JR

      And it's happened forever, and they used it for the World Trade Organization in ni- was it '99? Whatever it was. And Alex detailed that in depth, and he showed, through news reports, he, he showed through stories in the news, and he showed through video clips how these masked people came in and took this peaceful protest, and they just started randomly breaking windows and tipping over mailboxes and doing all this crazy shit, and how they were ultimately let go.

    6. JS

      Yeah.

    7. JR

      And now they're all wearing government-issued boots, and the cops never arrested them, or they, they, they were ... They allowed them to hide out in a building together, and then they, they all made some sort of a negotiation and released them.

    8. JS

      I think, but I think that fuels conspiracy theorists is that the shit even just our government has done-

    9. JR

      Yeah.

    10. JS

      ... over the years has been so weird that I don't blame people. Like, I mean, not-

    11. JR

      Not even weird.

    12. JS

      ... the secret bombing of Cambodia.

    13. JR

      Yes.

    14. JS

      I mean, that's like-

    15. JR

      Yes.

    16. JS

      ... uh, superhero villain shit.

    17. JR

      Well, how about the Gulf of Tonkin incident?

    18. JS

      Yeah, yeah. All that shit.

    19. JR

      That got us into Vietnam.

    20. JS

      Yeah.

    21. JR

      How about Operation Northwoods? Signed by the Joint Chiefs of Staff and vetoed by k- by Kennedy.

    22. JS

      Yeah.

    23. JR

      They were gonna blow up a fucking jet liner and blame it on Cuba. They were gonna have a drone jet liner, say it was filled with people. You know, this is ... What was this, '61 or something like that? And then they were gonna, they were gonna use Cuban friendlies, armed Cuban friendlies, to attack Guantanamo Bay.

    24. JS

      Yeah.

    25. JR

      And they were gonna use this as, uh, impetus to go to war with Cuba. It's crazy shit, and that was ... That's real. I mean, this is all available through the Freedom of Information Act. You can read the Operation Northwoods documents. This is a plan they had. I mean, this was gonna cost American lives because they wanted to gather some sort of motivation from the, from the American people.

    26. JS

      Consensus.

    27. JR

      They wanted to get the American people involved to the point where they were, uh, willing to go to war with Cuba.

    28. JS

      Yeah.

    29. JR

      It's crazy when you think that that is actually ...... our government in 1961, or where- wha- whenever it was, '62, whenever it was. It was before Kennedy got killed, and he got killed in '63, right? So whatever happened from then, like, those people weren't prosecuted. They didn't, they weren't brought in front of Congress and, like, explain yourself.

    30. JS

      There's no account- there's often no accountability.

  7. 36:5838:37

    ‘The Quick Fix’: fad psychology, implicit bias tests, and wasted billions

    1. JR

      You got a book in there?

    2. JS

      ... one of these for you.

    3. JR

      Heard you got a book.

    4. JS

      Yeah. It's so weird that-

    5. JR

      Jessie, did you write a book?

    6. JS

      (laughs)

    7. JR

      The Quick Fix?

    8. JS

      It's a very douchey thing to do, but I care- this is for Jamie-

    9. JR

      Th- this is-

    10. JS

      If you want a copy.

    11. JR

      This is your book about psychological things, right? Like-

    12. JS

      Yeah.

    13. JR

      ... explain your book.

    14. JS

      Yeah. It's, uh, The Quick Fix: Why Fad Psychology Can't Cure Social Ills. That's a good sign that I had to look at the book to remember what it's called.

    15. JR

      (laughs)

    16. JS

      Uh, I was a science editor at New York Magazine. I wrote about psychology basically. Uh, and every day we get press releases from Harvard, from Yale, from University of Pennsylvania that psychologists are figuring out amazing stuff about how to fix the world. How to fix racism, how to fix the educational system, and a lot of these when I looked into them more, there's, like, nothing there. There's no actual result there. And people spend, um, you know, hundreds of millions of dollars on these ideas that don't really do anything. Have you ever taken the, um, you know, the implicit association test, what that is?

    17. JR

      No.

    18. JS

      All right. Do you know implicit bias?

    19. JR

      Yes.

    20. JS

      Okay. So this is a test, you sit at a computer, it tells you how unconsciously racist you are. So anyone listening to this who's done a diversity training recently at work has probably heard of the implicit association test. Since 1998, leading psychologists are like, "This test will measure your unconscious racism, racism you're not even aware of, and this leaks into the real world that makes you do racist stuff." And we end up spending millions of dollars on it, every school embraces it, every company embraces it, except whoops, there's nothing there. It doesn't actually measure anything. So I'm really interested in those instances where, like, the most im- and maybe this is, uh, why I should drink with Alex Jones, where the most important experts in the world tell us shit and it's just, it's not true.

    21. JR

      Mm.

    22. JS

      Yeah.

  8. 38:3746:08

    Clickbait science journalism and the replication crisis in psychology

    1. JR

      Um, how much has to do w- when the- the spreading of this kind of information, how much of it has to do with clickbait?

    2. JS

      Right.

    3. JR

      One of the things that's disturbed me over the last decade or so is that journalism, even journalism at its highest levels, without naming any names, but, like, fabled institutions are resorting to clickbait. You know, my friend Kurt Metzger said something about the New York Times once, he said, "It's like a fat girl's Tumblr blog now." And I'm like, that is such a fucked up thing to say. But what he was saying was that there's stories that are written in there that are, they're not what you associate with the New York Times-

    4. JS

      Yeah.

    5. JR

      ... of old. I still read the New York Times, I still love it.

    6. JS

      Me too. Yeah.

    7. JR

      I think it's great. I mean, uh, I think people are always looking for flaws in any, uh, any institution, right? Especially a- a- a fabled one in times of chaos like we are today.

    8. JS

      Part of us wants to see them collapse.

    9. JR

      Exactly.

    10. JS

      Yeah.

    11. JR

      Part... Yeah, people do, but I still think they're the best. And I think it's, um, there's something about having, uh, a reputation to uphold that does force people to the higher standards. But those standards are different. It's- it's very difficult to find unbiased, objective news with a clean headline today because people aren't buying the newspaper like they were.

    12. JS

      Yeah.

    13. JR

      It's mostly clicking things online. And, you know, there's a lot of these that have, they rely on subscription services. You know, they rely on someone coming along and, uh, saying, "You know what? I value your journalism so much, I'm gonna give you some money." And then you have to justify the articles, like, y- y- you know, there's ads on these articles in a lot of times, and you gotta get people to click on them. So you have maybe a title to that article that's not totally accurate or bends the truth a little bit, or it's inflammatory-

    14. JS

      Well, and everyone gets more desperate 'cause they-

    15. JR

      Yes.

    16. JS

      ... just need to keep feeding the beast.

    17. JR

      Yeah.

    18. JS

      So I think the key difference is, like, I would imagine, you know, I never got to be a science writer- writer or editor in 1990, but back then journalism was healthy.

    19. JR

      Yes.

    20. JS

      And I bet you could be a writer, you know, you publi- it's still hard work, but-

    21. JR

      Right.

    22. JS

      ... you publish three articles a week, four articles a week. When I was editing Science of Us, that was the sort of behavioral science site at New York Magazine. I forget what it was, I think we had to publish, like, 15 to 20 things a week. So when Harvard-

    23. JR

      That's a lot.

    24. JS

      Yeah, dude. When Harvard sends you a press release, they're like, "We have this amazing new study." We're like, "Great, write it up." We don't call the researcher-

    25. JR

      Right.

    26. JS

      ... we don't read it closely. Oftentimes we read the press release, but not the study itself.

    27. JR

      Mm.

    28. JS

      And it- it's sort of like, um, uh, the press releases often, th- they don't quite lie, but they leave out a lot of details. And- and... So 2010 was sort of the peak when the stuff in my book in psychology, like, the worst psychology was being published. 2010 was also when things got really, really clickbaity, I think.

    29. JR

      Why was, wha- what happened in 2010 that, like, the worst psychology got published?

    30. JS

      This is where it gets complicated, but, like, certain areas of research. So one of them is called social priming, and that's the idea that if I, like, if I flash an American flag before your eyes for 300 milliseconds, you'll get way more patriotic. And-

  9. 46:0853:25

    Academia and newsroom groupthink: hoax papers, HR fear, and ‘unsafe’ rhetoric

    1. JR

      Listen, I've had some schwaggy Pennsylvania weed and it freaked me out. Human Reactions to Rape Culture and Queer Performatory at Urban Dog Parks in Portland, Oregon. That's the paper.

    2. JS

      Yeah.

    3. JR

      Yeah. I mean, they, they published this in Gender, Place, and Cultural: A Journal of Feminist Geography. And i- Helen Wilson, and it got applauded.

    4. JS

      Yeah, it won an award, right?

    5. JR

      Yeah, I mean they were saying, "This is amazing scholarship. This is incredible work." But it just goes to show you academia's in a weird place, man. It's, it's in this weird ... It's always been in a weird place, but it's in an exceptionally weird place today with the climate of our culture, because these people, a lot of them that are teaching these courses, a lot of them th- that are professors, they went from being a student and living in this world to then getting a job at the university to becoming a professor.

    6. JS

      Yeah.

    7. JR

      So they've never been out there in the regular world outside of this insulated bubble of academia.

    8. JS

      The same thing is happening in journalism because (coughs) especially as like more and more of us come from, um, upper middle class, like good college settings, we all have the same beliefs. We're all not really tolerant of people with different beliefs and it's turning journalism into a shit show actually.

    9. JR

      Yeah.

    10. JS

      Uh, it's really depressing 'cause like what's the point of being a journalist or an academic if you're not gonna be open-minded and actually interrogate the world a little bit?

    11. JR

      It's just so important to have objective unbiased versions of the truth.

    12. JS

      Yeah.

    13. JR

      That's wh- And to not have that, you know, in a, in a reliable source, I mean, like I said, I think the New York Times is the best. Wa- I think Washington Post is excellent too. There's, there's a lot of good newspapers still that I think do the best job that we currently have available.

    14. JS

      Yeah, yeah.

    15. JR

      But I would like something that's bulletproof.

    16. JS

      Well-

    17. JR

      I would like something that doesn't have any opinion pieces that are preposterous.

    18. JS

      It's hard to get that. And it's-

    19. JR

      It's hard.

    20. JS

      I, I often get emails from people that are like, "You know, I don't trust the Times anymore. What should I do?" It's like, no, you shou- you should mostly trust the Times. You should realize-

    21. JR

      Yes.

    22. JS

      ... that like they're a human institution. I don't think if we went back in time and, to 1970 the Times would be bulletproof then. They published garbage then too.

    23. JR

      I think-

    24. JS

      I do think it's getting worse.

    25. JR

      Yeah, I think so.

    26. JS

      Yeah.

    27. JR

      Well, I think the worst is television. Television news is, is the most ...

    28. JS

      It's unwatchable.

    29. JR

      It's the most nutty, and that's why p- things like, um, you know, uh, what is, what is Crystal and Saagar's new show called?

    30. NA

      Uh, Breaking Points?

  10. 53:251:19:23

    Pandemic-era polarization and the ‘exhausted majority’

    1. JS

      So, I, I was the one who brought up the connection to mental health and I do think there's some mentally ill people who get... You know, Twitter makes it worse. I-

    2. JR

      For sure.

    3. JS

      But I think that's like sort of... I'm worried that's, like, too easy now 'cause, um... I don't know if you remember this. You might have talked about this on the show. There was a moment last year when all the public health researchers were like, "Those far-right protestors getting together to protest masks and lockdown, that's so dangerous. You can't get together. There's a, there's a pandemic." Then the next week, George Floyd happened and then there's BLM protests-

    4. JR

      Mm-hmm.

    5. JS

      ... and like, "You can do BLM protests."

    6. JR

      Yeah.

    7. JS

      So it's like the same people flipping it. That kind of behavior, that's not mental illness. That's just like you, you want the positive approval. You wanna stay in the good graces-

    8. JR

      Right.

    9. JS

      ... of your tribe. So I think it's a little bit of both.

    10. JR

      Well, there's... Again, we're going back to confirmation bias and this is a conversation that I was having with a friend of mine who was pro the George Floyd protests and, uh, and I said, "Listen, I'm 100% pro people protesting." I go, "If they're just protesting. As soon as it gets violent and the chaos and... That, that bothers me." But it is kinda crazy that all of a sudden we're okay with people screaming shoulder to shoulder with each other.

    11. JS

      Yeah.

    12. JR

      Like, the whole idea is that this stuff is airborne.

    13. JS

      Yeah.

    14. JR

      And, you know, his take on it was like, "There's no, uh, significant evidence that proves that it's spreading." I go, "That is horse shit, man." I go, "If you look at the- the- the fucking jumps, there's a big jump in infections post ... If like ... There's like 10 days after these protests."

    15. JS

      Yeah.

    16. JR

      There's always a big jump. I go, "It doesn't mean you shouldn't be able to protest. It means we should have a real discussion about-"

    17. JS

      Yeah, that's all you want is a discussion.

    18. JR

      Yes.

    19. JS

      Yeah.

    20. JR

      About freedom and about what you should and shouldn't be able to do, and then what- what exactly we're doing with these protests.

    21. JS

      Yeah.

    22. JR

      You know?

    23. JS

      I do think like the combined effect of just like the lockdowns on- on everyone's mental health-

    24. JR

      Yeah.

    25. JS

      I just think we're gonna see that for a long time.

    26. JR

      Oh, yeah.

    27. JS

      That destroyed everybody.

    28. JR

      Well, it shifted our country in a very bad way, I think. I re- I really do think it did, and I think there's a lot of people that were already unbalanced and- and kinda mentally unwell, and that pushed them over the edge. And we gotta figure out how to bring people back, and (exhales) I don't know how to do that. I mean, I've ... uh, I remember a- a time where it didn't seem-

    29. JS

      (coughs)

    30. JR

      ... like there was this gigantic gap between, uh, people in the left and people in the right, and even people in the center. Like, there's people that are angry if you're a centrist.

Episode duration: 3:03:18

Install uListen for AI-powered chat & search across the full episode — Get Full Transcript

Transcript of episode azm7wCa8V18

Get more out of YouTube videos.

High quality summaries for YouTube videos. Accurate transcripts to search & find moments. Powered by ChatGPT & Claude AI.