Skip to content
The Joe Rogan ExperienceThe Joe Rogan Experience

Joe Rogan Experience #1717 - Alex Berenson

Alex Berenson is a journalist and author of both fiction and non-fiction. His latest book, "Pandemia: How Coronavirus Hysteria Took Over Our Government, Rights, and Lives," will be published on November 30, 2021.

Joe RoganhostAlex Berensonguest
Jun 27, 20243h 21mWatch on YouTube ↗

EVERY SPOKEN WORD

  1. 0:003:01

    Twitter ban, censorship, and why “being right” became a liability

    1. JR

      (drumbeats) Joe Rogan podcast, check it out.

    2. NA

      The Joe Rogan Experience.

    3. JR

      Train by day, Joe Rogan podcast by night. All day. (instrumental music plays) Hello, guys. (laughs) Hello, Joe.

    4. AB

      (laughs) What's it like to be in Twitter jail?

    5. JR

      Well, you're not even in Twitter jail. You're, like, excommunicado. I'm, I'm banned, yeah.

    6. AB

      You're banned.

    7. JR

      Permanently suspended.

    8. AB

      For telling the truth.

    9. JR

      For telling the truth. (laughs)

    10. AB

      That's what the fascinating thing is, y- everything that you were banned for is verifiable.

    11. JR

      (laughs)

    12. AB

      There's sources. You could go read those sources. I watched the whole process go down. I, I don't understand.

    13. JR

      Um, yeah. Well, I'm not a naive guy, but I thought that being right would, would actually help, and it turns out being right hurts.

    14. AB

      Well, during this incredibly confusing time, where people are more hysterical and more freaked out and anxiety-filled than I've ever seen people in all of my 54 years of life, this is the peak.

    15. JR

      (laughs)

    16. AB

      This is, this is post-9/11 peak.

    17. JR

      Yes.

    18. AB

      Like, 9/11 was, uh, a big anxiety moment for people, but at least it brought us all together. This, because of whatever it is, it's... whether it's social media algorithms or it's just, just an- the inevitable decline of an empire or whatever the fuck it is-

    19. JR

      (coughs)

    20. AB

      ... we have hit a weird place right now.

    21. JR

      Yeah. Yes. Um, I, you know, I would say, the people who were sort of very complacent about vaccinations, uh, and being vaccinated in the spring-

    22. AB

      (coughs)

    23. JR

      ... are now very angry. But they're angry (laughs) at the wrong people.

    24. AB

      (laughs)

    25. JR

      They're... somehow, they're blaming people who are not vaccinated. They should be blaming Pfizer and the lies that the CDC told them.

    26. AB

      Well, what's really interesting, there's almost no anger at the lab in Wuhan.

    27. JR

      (laughs) That's true, too.

    28. AB

      Very strange. Almost no anger. Almost none. It's almost like an inconvenient truth that most likely, this virus emerged from a lab. I mean, uh, Saagar Enjeti from, uh, Breaking Points broke down exactly when it went down, who were the initial people that got infected, how it most likely spread. Um, it's been documented by Josh Dubin extensively, the involvement of, uh, Fauci, the NIH, uh, the EcoHealth Alliance. All of the input, all of the deceptive public statements contrasted to the internal emails that showed a real concern that they might be responsible for it, a real concern that gain-of-function research might have been the cause of this, and no anger at that. But anger at people who are unvaccinated.

    29. JR

      (laughs)

    30. AB

      Even people who are unvaccinated and healthy. Even people who have taken care of their body for their entire life, exercised, ate right, take vitamins. People who are fit and who don't want to take a chance with anything else.

  2. 3:015:21

    Replacing Twitter with Substack: audience, reach, and the economics of deplatforming

    1. JR

      I, b- yeah. I'll, I mean, just to, uh, y- yeah, it's funny you mention the lab leak. So, you know, I now have this Substack, which is sort of my inadequate effort to replace Twitter. I mean, I've-

    2. AB

      Tell people how to get to that, by the way.

    3. JR

      So... Sure. So, uh, Substack is substack.com. My, uh, parti-... Substack is essentially a newsletter service and a hosting service, and they have guaranteed free expression. That's what, that's what they've said. They've said they're not gonna censor. Um, I have to choose to believe them on that. Uh, I, I believed in Twitter for a while. That confidence was clearly misplaced. But Substa- Substack says they're not gonna censor me, uh, or other people, and I gotta hope that's true. 'Cause-

    4. AB

      How many people do you have in your Substack now?

    5. JR

      Uh, more than 150,000.

    6. AB

      That's nice.

    7. JR

      Yes. E-

    8. AB

      Let's see if we can juice that up.

    9. JR

      Eh, I hope so.

    10. AB

      Yeah. Here it is, Unreported Truths.

    11. JR

      Yes.

    12. AB

      So you type in your email, and then...

    13. JR

      And you can subscribe. You can s-

    14. AB

      Yeah. Or you can just say, "Let me read it first."

    15. JR

      Yep. Oh-

    16. AB

      You don't have to subscribe.

    17. JR

      And you will see the fir-

    18. AB

      Beautiful.

    19. JR

      I... Excited to be in Austin to talk to Joe Rogan today.

    20. AB

      Yeah. Beautiful.

    21. JR

      Um, and so, uh, so you... By the way, most of the people who are s- who are signed up do not pay. You can choose to pay or not pay. Basically, you're gonna get the same content. I'm very clear about that. There will be a few things extra you get. But for the most part, this is not... it's not about money for me. It's about getting the largest audience possible. Um, and so I have more than 150,000 people signed up right now. But I gotta tell you, Twitter, on Twitter I had 350,000, 345,000, and that was growing, uh, by about 1,000 a day towards the end. And, um, I had 25 million profile views in August, and almost 200 million, uh, impressions. So Twitter, in, i- in cutting me off, Twitter not only defamed me, they really hurt m- my efforts to get the word out.

    22. AB

      Well, it's also one of the very best examples that I think I've ever come across of egregious censorship that is ideologically based and not based on anyone doing anything that is, uh, whether it's... w- what I... I don't know what their code of conduct is, whether it's about someone being malicious, or it's about someone being untruthful or misrepresentation of the facts. You did none of those things.

    23. JR

      None of those things, (laughs) no.

    24. AB

      You really didn't. I mean, I watched it very carefully. I mean, you and I went back and forth with DMs, and I, I, I watched your, your feed very carefully.

    25. JR

      And you would ask me questions, some- And I'd say, "You know, Joe, I disagree with this."

    26. AB

      Yeah.

    27. JR

      "I, I... You know, you can't go this far."

    28. AB

      Right.

    29. JR

      I would say that to you. Um, uh-

  3. 5:218:54

    Vaccine narrative whiplash: breakthrough infections, shifting goalposts, and UK/Israel data

    1. AB

      Well, you were very... Yeah. You're, you're very... I'm gonna say very objective about your interpretation of the data and what you think is going on versus, you know, what is, uh, being purported. And I should say, f- first of all, right away, you were correct about a lot of the data, uh, particularly coming out of Israel. You sounded the warning shots long before anyone else that not only do the vaccines have, uh, a certain l- there's a, like, a window of, of, uh, efficacy-

    2. JR

      Yep.

    3. AB

      ... whether it's three months or five months, whatever it is-

    4. JR

      It's in there, yeah.

    5. AB

      Yeah. But you were saying that people who are vaccinated are getting sick, and people were treating that like you were saying that vampires were rising.

    6. JR

      (laughs) That's what-

    7. AB

      It was crazy. It was crazy to watch. They were saying, "You're lying," but now that's the narrative. The narrative is like, "The vaccines were never supposed to prevent you from getting sick. They're supposed to keep you from being hospitalized."

    8. JR

      Not, not even that anymore. Now it's basically, "They'll prevent you from dying," which, which also probably... I mean, there's, there's, there's evidence, there's some evidence of benefit of really serious illness or death. But I'm not even convinced we're gonna... when we look back over, let's say, another 12 months out, that that's gonna be the case, okay?

    9. AB

      Well, there have been people that have been fully vaccinated who've died from COVID.

    10. JR

      Okay. All right.

    11. AB

      And it's publicly... There was one that was...... crazy, where this woman was fully vaccinated, she got COVID, she died, and the, the headline was "Because some people didn't get vaccinated, my mom died."

    12. JR

      (laughs) Yeah.

    13. AB

      And I was like, "What the fuck did you just say?"

    14. JR

      But, but Joe, it's much worse than that. You say some people, like it's rare. In, in the UK, okay, and the best data we have comes out of the UK and Israel. And I, I, I have to keep saying this to people because they almost don't believe it. In the UK, 70+% of the people who die now from COVID are fully vaccinated. And in Israel, that was-

    15. AB

      70%?

    16. JR

      ... 70%, seven in 10 of the people. I'm gonna keep saying it 'cause nobody believes it, but the numbers are there in the government documents, okay? They're not a secret. It's not a conspiracy theory. It's not somebody saying, "Oh, I heard this from my cousin." It's in British government documents.

    17. AB

      Can you put, put that up so-

    18. JR

      Sure.

    19. AB

      ... that Jamie can see it?

    20. JR

      Sure.

    21. AB

      Can you tell Jamie which, uh ...

    22. JR

      Uh, if you go to, um, it, it's called the Technical Briefing, uh, uh, from the UK Public Health England. If you look at variants of concern, you should be able to pull up, uh, uh, uh, Google should have a couple pages for you, and then I can walk you through where it is. But, but just to be clear on this, seven out of 10 of the people dying of COVID in the UK now are fully vaccinated, and another 5% or so are partly vaccinated, meaning they had one shot but not the second. That was also the case in Israel until August, I mean, in August. And that's why they freaked out and made everyone get boosters, 'cause when you get the booster, you briefly drive up your antibodies. We don't know what the long-term effects are, but in the short term, that makes the numbers look better for vaccines.

    23. AB

      (sighs) This is crazy.

    24. JR

      (laughs)

    25. AB

      W- w- what's, what's crazy is that, um, I know a lot of people that got vaccinated and then immediately stopped taking vitamins. A, a good friend of mine, h- he got vaccinated and then he got COVID after he got vaccinated. He goes, "You know what, man? Once I got vaccinated, I stopped taking vitamins."

    26. JR

      (laughs)

    27. AB

      "I stopped, I stopped." 'Cause before that he was taking zinc and vitamin C and quercetin, and he was like really keeping up on his vitamin regimen and making sure that he was ... And then once he got vaccinated, he was like, "Oh, we're good. (sighs) I made it." And then he got COVID.

    28. JR

      And then he got COVID. And he probably was okay, right, in the end, but he probably would've been okay either way.

  4. 8:5415:38

    Ivermectin and the “horse dewormer” framing: evidence limits, propaganda, and media coordination

    1. AB

      He was okay. He wasn't feeling so good, and his doctor prescribed him ivermectin.

    2. JR

      Ah, ivermectin.

    3. AB

      And this, this is before the ivermectin horse dewormer craze-

    4. JR

      (laughs)

    5. AB

      ... became public, uh, disinformation campaign number one. Um, but ivermectin essentially knocked him out of it. He, he was good within 24 hours after taking ivermectin.

    6. JR

      So I'm gonna say something you don't like.

    7. AB

      No, do-

    8. JR

      We, we have no idea if ivermectin works or doesn't.

    9. AB

      Well-

    10. JR

      I know it worked for you.

    11. AB

      ... but we do know it works in vitro. We do know that, right?

    12. JR

      Uh, y- yes, but the argument is that it's given ... Okay.

    13. AB

      Explain that, that it w- how it works in vitro.

    14. JR

      Okay. So the idea is that it interferes with the binding of, uh, of SARS-CoV-2 to your cells.

    15. AB

      It stops viral replication in vitro, though.

    16. JR

      Y- Yes.

    17. AB

      I can, I can show you the studies on that.

    18. JR

      But, but, but the old joke about this is it's easy to cure cancer in mice, okay?

    19. AB

      Right, right.

    20. JR

      Human beings are complicated, and the argument that people... uh, the anti-ivermectin argument people make is in doses that would be another ... i- if you dose it for humans at the levels that it, that it blocks that replication in vitro, you'd kill humans. So in other words, it's not ... it's-

    21. AB

      Really?

    22. JR

      Yes.

    23. AB

      Kill humans?

    24. JR

      I'm exagger-

    25. AB

      I don't know if that's true because it's, it's not really a toxic drug.

    26. JR

      Uh, I, I'm, I'm exaggerating. But what ... The point is, th- that I'm trying to make is that at the levels that it's given in humans, which I think is less than a milligram per kilogram of body weight, it doesn't have-

    27. AB

      Yeah, it's, uh, six.

    28. JR

      0.6, right?

    29. AB

      .06, yeah.

    30. JR

      That it hasn't been shown at those levels in vitro to work.

  5. 15:3821:28

    Search and language control: Google results, redefining “anti-vax,” and mandate politics

    1. AB

      It's one of the reasons why I stopped using Google to search things too.

    2. JR

      (laughs)

    3. AB

      They're doing, they're doing something to curate information where like if I wanted to find specific cases about people who died from vaccine, uh, related injuries, I had to go to DuckDuckGo.

    4. JR

      Yeah.

    5. AB

      I wasn't, I wasn't finding them on Google.

    6. JR

      Yes. Yes.

    7. AB

      And I'm like, "Okay, well, this is crazy."

    8. JR

      Yes.

    9. AB

      "Like you, you guys are hiding information." I'm looking for very specific people and very specific cases, and, um, I'm getting CDC websites and I'm getting, you know, uh, articles on the, the, the disinformation attached to, to vaccines and vaccines being safe and effective, which for the most part they are, just like peanuts-

    10. JR

      Right.

    11. AB

      ... are safe and effective for the most part.

    12. JR

      Well, (laughs) ...

    13. AB

      You know?

    14. JR

      Well, I mean, but again, we can... Listen, I've been vaccinated against everything, well, you know, as a child. I'm, uh, not COVID, okay, I'm not vaccinated against COVID, but I'm talking about am I an anti-vaxxer? No.

    15. AB

      Do you know the newest Webster definition of anti-vax includes someone who's against vaccine mandates or someone who's against vaccinating children?

    16. JR

      Seriously?

    17. AB

      Yes.

    18. JR

      I did not know that. (laughs)

    19. AB

      Yeah, we'll pull this up because this is new. They've, they've, they've updated the term anti-vaxxer to not just mean someone who believes in fucking apple cider vinegar cures cancer-

    20. JR

      (laughs)

    21. AB

      ... like these wacky fucks-

    22. JR

      Right, right, right.

    23. AB

      ... but someone who thinks that vaccine mandates are a dangerous slippery slope to fascism. Now you're an anti-vaxxer. Like you have to fully buy into the narrative or you get labeled this very-

    24. JR

      It's-

    25. AB

      ... pejorative, uh, look at this. Definition of an, person who opposes the use of vaccine or regulations-

    26. JR

      What?

    27. AB

      ... mandating a vaccination.

    28. JR

      No, I, that's incredible to me.

    29. AB

      It is incredible. It's dirty, man.

    30. JR

      It's dir-... By, by the way, Jimmy, if you haven't been able to find that, I can, uh, I can try to, uh, to walk you through.

  6. 21:2829:04

    How mRNA vaccines work—and why protection may wane faster than natural infection

    1. AB

      We should explain to people that maybe don't know what th- just in case someone's listening that do- doesn't know how a regular vaccine works. A regular vaccine, if it's for smallpox, has a, uh, an inert v- version of smallpox in it. So you can't catch it, but your body recognizes it, your body develops the immunity to smallpox, and then it fights it off. The-

    2. JR

      That's basically ... Yeah.

    3. AB

      Yeah. Right?

    4. JR

      Yep.

    5. AB

      And these MRNA vaccines, which by, by the way, the, the technology's amazing and fascinating, and it seems to have like profound possibilities in terms of like the ability to fight cancer. Like, they have a lot of, like really interesting research on the horizon. So this is not demonizing the concept of MRNA vaccines. But what they essentially do is they, they tell your body to produce a certain spike protein, and this develops this ability to fight off the COVID v- variants and-

    6. JR

      So, so, so if you think of coronavirus, it, you know, it's called coronavirus 'cause it has this corona of spikes. Uh, it's got ... It looks like a ball and it's got these nasty little spikes poking off it.

    7. AB

      Is there a real photo of one of those things?

    8. JR

      Um, it's not ... The- it's all sort of computer generated. It's too small to, uh, to take a proper photo of.

    9. AB

      So how do they know it's got the spikes?

    10. JR

      'Cause they know what the shape is f- because they have the, um, they have the complete genetic code, um, and then, and they know what, uh, antibody ... I'm sorry, what, um, what amino acids it produces and they know what those look like.

    11. AB

      Mm-hmm.

    12. JR

      So I mean, biology is magic these days. I mean, it's truly magic.

    13. AB

      'Cause it ... at such small levels of-

    14. JR

      Th- they can predict-

    15. AB

      Yeah.

    16. JR

      ... wha- how this thing's gonna fold on itself.

    17. AB

      Yeah.

    18. JR

      Okay? And they can actually predict what the mutations will cause the co- the, the structural confirmation of this thing which is, you know, so small you can't imagine how small it is. They can imagine how it's gonna look and, and when I say imagine, it's really predict. Okay? And then they can predict how it's going to attach to your cells. So long story short on that, they know what the spike protein looks like and they know how to make your body make it. So, so when you get the vaccine, as you say, you're not getting a whole inactivated coronavirus. That's, um ... The Chinese vaccines are, use that technology. Uh, it's-

    19. AB

      Do they?

    20. JR

      Yes. Uh-

    21. AB

      How ... And is that more effective?

    22. JR

      No, it's less effective for-

    23. AB

      Really?

    24. JR

      Yes. Um, a- and for whatever reason, with respiratory viruses, the whole inactivated virus thing, or the, it's sometimes called attenuated virus, doesn't work very well for ... We, we don't quite know why.

    25. AB

      But I thought that, um, they thought that this was a respiratory virus, but really it's attacking the epithelial-

    26. JR

      It's both. Both.

    27. AB

      Both.

    28. JR

      So you have, you have the receptors that this virus attacks all over your body, in both your lungs ... It- there's a ton in your lungs, but there's also a ton in the smooth muscle cells of your, of your, um, vasculature.

    29. AB

      Mm-hmm.

    30. JR

      So, uh, so it is a, it is a ... It does have vascular complications, this virus. So, so you ... So, so you get this vaccine, it's a little bundle of RNA, in the case of the Pfizer and the Moderna vaccines, which is, which is stuck inside, um, what's called the lipid nanoparticle. Again, incredible technology. That, that bundle of RNA gets into your cells, actually just like the virus would, um, and it tells your cells, "Make the spike protein."So you then have a ton of spike protein in, in these cells. Now one of the promises about the vaccine that has turned out not to be true is you're only gonna have those spike proteins in a, basically near the injection site. And turns out, unfortunately, some of them... some vaccine appears to leak and travel.

  7. 29:0454:08

    Variant escape and worst-case immunology: from mutation selection to ADE fears

    1. JR

      So here's the p- here... of, of, of the many, many... there are many, many problems around vaccine immunity. Because your immunity is so tailored to the spike protein, and not just the spike protein, to one part of it, to the receptor binding domain it's called of the spike protein, if the virus mutates just a little bit in that part, those vaccine antibodies you have don't work very well anymore. And you don't have the backup stuff that you get w- as... uh, you know, you personally and everybody else who's been infected and recovered gets.

    2. AB

      Yeah, I was reading something about that today. I actually made a note about it because I knew it was gonna come up on the podcast today because, uh, I found, I found this, uh, discussion of it to be pretty interesting. But this one guy had this take on it where he said that, um, that natural immunity is demonstratably more... demonstrably more generalized and robust to variant mutations, and that the vaccines are designed to be specifically targeted, and that's what allowed them to get created so quickly. Is that like-

    3. JR

      Yes, that's absolutely correct.

    4. AB

      ... an accurate assessment of it?

    5. JR

      Well, I mean, think about, think about it. You're the virus, okay? I mean, the virus doesn't think, okay, but it wants to survive. If, if, you know, different human beings are gonna have somewhat different responses to natural infection. The vaccine response is always the same, okay, 'cause the vaccine is always the same.

    6. AB

      Mm-hmm.

    7. JR

      So the vaccine response is we're gonna generate a ton of antibodies for this one particular part of the spike protein. Well, the virus, quote-unquote, "knows" that if it can just mutate that bit of itself-... it will escape vaccination, right? It will escape vaccine immunity, I should say. And that's what the virus appears to be doing. And there's a paper out of Japan from August where these researchers demonst- and these are all first rate, okay? These are first rate academic institutions that are doing this. They demonstrated that four relatively small vacs- uh, four relatively small mutations on SARS-CoV-2 could lead to escape for the vaccine, uh, from vaccine-generated immunity.

    8. AB

      Escape meansing- meaning that the vaccine-generated immunity would be non-existent?

    9. JR

      Or, or close to non-existent. Th- that's not the worst case scenario, by the way. The worst case scenario is that the virus mutates in a way that the vaccine actually, it's called, this is why it's called antibody-dependent enhancement. The va- the antibodies continue to be able to attach to part of the va- uh, of the virus, but the virus has mutated in a way that the- that after attaching, they actually help it bind to cells.

    10. AB

      Okay. Now, someone sent me something today from very fishy looking GeoCities type website that was claiming that there was some Department of Defense-

    11. JR

      Yes.

    12. AB

      ... artificial intelligence. Have you heard-

    13. JR

      Yes.

    14. AB

      ... that this is going around?

    15. JR

      I, I, yeah, I thought it was BS, but I think it's actually totally true. We can pull it up. It's, it's correct.

    16. AB

      Really?

    17. JR

      Yes. It d- by the way, it, it's called Humetrics. Um-

    18. AB

      I read the w-

    19. JR

      I still want you to find this other thing, though.

    20. AB

      Okay.

    21. JR

      By the way, the, the, the-

    22. AB

      Jamie's doubling overtime with the fucking-

    23. All right, well, yeah, yeah.

    24. ... one-handed Googling.

    25. Let me, let, let's do that first before I go into Humetrics 'cause-

    26. JR

      Yeah, 'cause I don't want, I don't want-

    27. AB

      ... that sounds like a left turn.

    28. JR

      ... I don't want people to, you know, I, especially since I said 70% and I know that's such a stunning number, I don't want people to think I made that up.

    29. AB

      Yes, let's go over that first. So s-

    30. JR

      Uh-huh.

  8. 54:081:08:46

    Reading the UK Technical Briefing live: infections, deaths, and base-rate confusion

    1. JR

      I- I- well... I- var-... If you Google Variants of Concern UK Technical Briefing.

    2. AB

      Here it is.

    3. JR

      Okay. Uh... Oh. Tech- they've got 24 out now. That- that must have just come out. Uh, uh, so go to 24. And this'll be, uh... This'll be exciting for me too 'cause I haven't seen this too.

    4. AB

      Yeah, I was trying to figure out where in here I was supposed to look, but I started digging through stuff.

    5. JR

      Oh. Okay. Go- it's... Go down, down, down, down and-

    6. AB

      All right.

    7. JR

      Keep going, keep going, keep going, keep going. Yep. Keep going, keep going, keep going, keep go- uh, keep going.

    8. AB

      What are we looking for?

    9. JR

      Keep going, keep going. Okay. Uh, uh, okay. So this tells you, uh, as of... So as of the 27th of September there were, uh, there were 3,200 deaths, uh, from the Delta variant. Okay? Um, it... So that's gonna be... The Delta variant is almost all the cases these days, not just in the UK but everywhere in the world. So go d- go down some more.... uh, some more, some more, some more. And keep going, keep going, keep going. Secondary attack rates, uh, keep going, uh, keep going. Modern- and this is, this is variant stuff. Uh, keep going. Don't tell me they took it out. I don't think they took it out. Uh, keep going, keep going, keep going. Wha- Well, that's interesting. Uh, we may need to go back to the previous one, 'cause it's not in here. Uh, 20-

    10. AB

      What do you mean it's not? What's not in... Go to 23?

    11. JR

      Yeah, go to 23.

    12. AB

      Right below that?

    13. JR

      Uh...

    14. AB

      Yeah.

    15. JR

      Unless it's in the underlying data.

    16. AB

      That's what, I mean, like-

    17. What are we looking for here? What would you-

    18. JR

      What we're looking for is figures that will tell... Uh, you know what? Let me, let me... I don't wanna, I don't wanna have to subject the audience to this. Um, let me find it.

    19. AB

      So, w- uh, while you're... I guess, I've, was digging through that and I found this interpretation of data. It just, this said that there's a lot of people in that age range that would be vaccinated.

    20. JR

      Yes.

    21. AB

      'Cause I found there's a lot of people-

    22. JR

      Oh. Oh.

    23. AB

      ... in, in one chart that said there was like 200,000 people that got it that were unvaccinated under the age of like 25 or something like that.

    24. JR

      Yes. Go down, go down one more page. Uh, okay. Okay. All right, so this is, uh, Week 34 through Week 37. That's gonna be basically September. Uh, so this tells you, um, the rates... Oh, yes. This is great. Rates of illness among people who have and have not been vaccinated, uh, over on the right. So, what you can see is that in people over 50, rates of illness are higher in the vaccinated than the unvaccinated. You... 900 to 600 in people 50 to 60, 600 to 400 in people 60 to 70, 500 roughly to 360. In each of those cases, the number in the second-to-last graph lo- uh, in the second-to-last column is higher. So, what that's telling you is that people who are vaccinated with two doses are more likely to be infected with SARS-CoV-2 than people who are not infect- who, who are not vaccinated.

    25. AB

      It's interesting how it changes somewhere around, uh, 40 to 49.

    26. JR

      That's right. And the, and the, and there's a good, there's a good scientific reason for that, which is basically there's, uh, something called immunosensenescence, which basically means that your immune system, as you get older, has a harder time dealing with disease, right? We all... You mean, that's, that's sort of like intuitively obvious. It also has a harder time mounting the response that the vaccines are supposed to help with.

    27. AB

      Hmm.

    28. JR

      So, so okay. So that's one, that's one chart. And again, this is UK government data, and what it says is that the idea that this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated is a total lie. You are more likely to become sick if you are vaccinated than if you are not, and you're over 50-

    29. AB

      In these older categories?

    30. JR

      In these older categories, that's right.

  9. 1:08:461:16:14

    Boosters and institutional conflict: FDA resignations, committee votes, and CDC override

    1. JR

      I mean, in the countries that have real data that they're releasing on a timely basis, you see, okay, the vaccine... And in, in... Again, in Israel, last month, well, now it's August, they got so terrified they were gonna have the worst wave yet of COVID that they, that they gave people boosters. They asked, they asked the entire country to get boosters. Do you know how much data there was around booster shots when they did that? There was data, published data... It wasn't even published, it was just the company press release data, on about, about three dozen people, okay?

    2. AB

      That's it?

    3. JR

      Yes. People don't understand-

    4. AB

      36 people?

    5. JR

      Yeah. (laughs)

    6. AB

      Really?

    7. JR

      Yes, at that time. Okay, now there's data on a couple hundred, and that's what the FDA... That's why the FDA choked, okay? That's why the FDA wouldn't give Pfizer and Fauci and Biden what they wanted last month, because finally-

    8. AB

      Explain that to people.

    9. JR

      Okay, so in August, the vaccines go off the rails in Israel, okay? In June and July, I say the vaccines are going off the rails and people start to lose their mind, right? And that's when, that's when Twitter really starts to come at me. And we can talk about that chronology and we can talk about my potential legal causes of action against Twitter if we want, but you know what?

    10. AB

      Yeah, we definitely will.

    11. JR

      Let's not make that about, let's not make it about me.

    12. AB

      Yeah, okay.

    13. JR

      Okay? Okay, in June, beginning of June, there are 15 COVID cases a day in Israel. They are done with COVID. At the end of June, there are 300. In mid-July, there are 3,000. At the end of July, there, there are like... It might be, might have been... It might be the end of July when there were 3,000. In any case, 200-fold increase in cases a day in positive tests for COVID in, between June 1st and August 1st in Israel. The vaccines just stop working, okay? They just stop. You... Biologically, your body gets rid of these antibodies that it's been forced to generate and, uh, sort of like sociologically, people start getting sick. I mean, you know, there's what happens at the cellular level, and then there's what happens at the body level, right? At the, at the, at the like level of counting cases. So we know, we know antibodies go away, and we know people start getting sick again. That's a better way to explain it. Fine. Okay. By, by early July, I'm looking at this and I'm like, "You know, this does not look good," and I don't understand what's gonna turn it around. I don't understand why we think that the biology of these first few people to start getting infected post-vaccine is different than the biology of other people who were vaccinated later. I think this is gonna get worse, and I start saying this on Twitter, "Vaccines are failing. Vaccines are failing." People did not like hearing it. Okay. By the end of Augu- by the end of July, early August, it was clear that Israel and the UK were headed for a crisis. It was more clear in Israel 'cause the UK is a, it's a little bit complicated 'cause they used several different vaccines and they dosed them off schedule. Israel is just like the US. They used really only, they... Israel used only the Pfizer vaccine, where in the US we basically used only the Pfizer and Moderna, the MRNA vaccines. We used a little J&J but not very much. And Israel dosed on the schedule the companies had suggested, just as we did. Okay. It is clear by early August that something bad is happening, and the Israeli response is we want everyone to get a booster. Everyone. Over 80, under 80, sick, well, it doesn't matter. You got the vaccine, now you need your booster, okay? It's time for your bonus vaccine as I was, as I like to call it, the bonus vaccine. It's a free- freebie. Hey, good for Pfizer. Stocks of the companies of Pfizer and Moderna and BioNTech hit new highs when this happened. Why? Because a perfect product from Wall Street's point of view is a product that fails and needs to be redosed, right? The speculation earlier in the year was these are gonna last forever, people aren't gonna need many boosters. That was actually bad for the company stocks. Good for the company stocks is you need a booster.

    14. AB

      Right.

    15. JR

      Right? Planned obsolescence. You need a booster. It's like the iPhone, except it goes in your body and forces your cells to do something. Okay. Fauci, Biden... Who knows what Biden thinks? Who knows, or, or who knows what, if anything, Biden is thinking? But Fauci understands. He's not dumb. He knows what's going on. He knows that what he thought in April and May is wrong.... 'cause they're not gonna last forever. You're gonna need boosters. He goes to Biden, and in, in, uh, in late, I think it was August 20th, I don't even... The, the date's in the book, I think. But Biden says, "Time for your boosters. We're gonna give boosters to everybody after eight months." There's only one problem. These vaccines were approved on a two-dose schedule, okay? You get two doses, you're done. It's not a therapeutic. It's not a drug that your doctor prescribes to you. "You know what? I feel depressed. I, I, I'm gonna give you an antidepressant for a month, and we'll reconsider in a month." Uh, you know, "I, I have high cholesterol. Try this statin for three months. We'll take your blood again at the end of three months. We'll see how it goes." No, that's not what these are supposed to be. Supposed to be you get it, you're done. And the vaccine fanatics will say, "Oh, well, you know, uh, the tetanus shot sometimes people get after, after a 10-year boost." 10 years is very different than eight months, and that's... Uh, you know, uh, there's been so much sort of, I, I hate to say misinformation, but misinformation about why these vaccines are really so different. So Biden does this, okay? He, he promises the world, or the United States, we're all gonna get boosters. And two of the most senior FDA officials who are in charge of vaccine approval resign within two weeks, okay? They resign, and they write a letter with other people to The Lancet, which is probably the best medical journal in the world, saying, "We don't think boosters are a good idea for the general population." And somehow the media, "Well, yeah, you know, there, there were a few stories about this." Can you imagine if Donald Trump had said something so out of line about vaccines that two of his most senior FDA officials resigned within a couple weeks? The, the Democrats would be ready to impeach him. Like-

    16. AB

      Well, then, um, Biden... Or, yeah, he went and took a booster on television.

    17. JR

      Yeah. Okay. Good for him. He's 78 years old. He, maybe it makes sense for him, okay? Shou- should some 30-year-old or 40 or 50 or even 60-year-old be on a, on a treadmill of boosters?

    18. AB

      But this is the question. This is why it leads to... It's a conundrum because if the vaccines do gr- greatly reduce in their efficacy over six, seven, eight months and the FDA says, "No boosters," so that means you have no protection. So here we are eight months after people are being vaccinated, they're giving no recommendation to take a booster.

    19. JR

      Yeah.

    20. AB

      So it means you basically took a vaccine for nothing because-

    21. JR

      That's right. That's right. And they don't want to admit it. That's right.

    22. AB

      So by pulling, by the FDA pulling their recommendation for booster shots, they've essentially said do nothing?

    23. JR

      Well, so-

  10. 1:16:141:40:38

    Treatments vs vaccines: monoclonals, Merck’s antiviral, and the ‘one-basket’ strategy

    1. AB

      Well, now, and now we're in this position where Pfizer and M- Merck are both about to release a therapeutic.

    2. JR

      Uh, th- Merck's and Merck, the date on the Merck drug is actually quite good. They released it, uh... And by the way, the stocks of the vaccine companies went down more than 10% the day the Merck n- re- reports came out because Wall Street said, "Oh."

    3. AB

      "There's a therapeutic now."

    4. JR

      "There's an actual therapeutic, so we're not gonna be able to jam these boosters into people's arms forever."

Episode duration: 3:21:16

Install uListen for AI-powered chat & search across the full episode — Get Full Transcript

Transcript of episode piIcePucjgI

Get more out of YouTube videos.

High quality summaries for YouTube videos. Accurate transcripts to search & find moments. Powered by ChatGPT & Claude AI.