Skip to content
The Joe Rogan ExperienceThe Joe Rogan Experience

Joe Rogan Experience #1792 - Daryl Davis & Bill Ottman

Daryl Davis is a musician, activist, and author of "Klan-Destine Relationships: A Black Man's Odyssey in the Ku Klux Klan." Bill Ottman is an Internet entrepreneur, free speech activist, and CEO of Minds, a blockchain based social network. Davis and Ottman have launched #ChangeMinds: a new deradicalization initiative based upon the idea that deplatforming actually intensifies extremism.

Joe RoganhostDaryl DavisguestBill OttmanguestGuest (brief interjection)guest
Jun 27, 20241h 54mWatch on YouTube ↗

EVERY SPOKEN WORD

  1. 0:0015:00

    (drumbeats) Joe Rogan podcast,…

    1. NA

      (drumbeats) Joe Rogan podcast, check it out. The Joe Rogan Experience. Train by day, Joe Rogan podcast by night! All day. (instrumental music plays) And we're up.

    2. JR

      Gentlemen, what's happening? Good to see you.

    3. DD

      Hey, you're happening, man. Good to see you again.

    4. JR

      Good to see you.

    5. DD

      Thank you for having me back.

    6. JR

      You have a beautiful purple shirt, I love it.

    7. BO

      Uh, thanks for having us.

    8. JR

      And, um, thank you. And Bill, tell... So, first of all, tell me what's going on with Minds. Minds is one of the first, that I was aware of, like alternative social media networks that was committed to free speech.

    9. BO

      Yep.

    10. JR

      What, how- how's it going?

    11. BO

      It's going. I mean, there's sort of a whole landscape of alternative networks emerging. And so you've got this spectrum of apps where you've s-... Like, I think of... I put everything through a litmus test when I'm thinking of an alternative network. Basically, is it transparent? Does it publish their source code? Most of these alternative apps, I don't need to name names, but I could, they're, they don't publish their source code, so you can't look at the algorithms to see what's happening. You can't see if there's spyware in there, if they have Google Analytics little nasty-

    12. JR

      Right.

    13. BO

      ... stuff that's, that-

    14. JR

      So you're talking about Gettr.

    15. BO

      Gettr.

    16. JR

      Yeah.

    17. BO

      Um...

    18. JR

      Uh, 'cause I found out that, like-

    19. BO

      Parler, Rumble and now, and now, I'm not-

    20. JR

      All of them?

    21. BO

      I'm not trying to trash these people. I think that the free speech stuff is good, like the more... But some of their terms aren't even free speech. So, you know, free speech policy is essential. So I absolutely respect any network that is putting forward a free speech policy. But if, you can't have free speech policy with sketchy algorithms-

    22. JR

      Mm-hmm.

    23. BO

      ... and closed source code, because then we don't know if you're soft, uh, censoring, shadow banning. We don't know what's happening in the news feed behind the scenes.

    24. JR

      Right. Which we definitely know Facebook does, Instagram does, Twitter does, that's all real.

    25. BO

      Right. So then you've got, are they privacy focused? End-to-end encrypted? Do they have access to the content of your messages?

    26. JR

      Mm.

    27. BO

      Um, like, so we use a end-to-end encrypted messenger protocol called Matrix, so that we don't even have access to people's conversations. Like, I don't want access.

    28. JR

      Right.

    29. BO

      And then you've also got, um, you know, do they pay creators fairly? So you've got these check marks that you go through with e-... But open source is key. The future, there is nothing without open source. Any app, if they're claiming to be an alternative and they're not open source, they're not in the same conversation. It's a completely different animal, and they should not be taken seriously, because they're not being transparent with the world. So, and then you get into decentralization and actually building an app that... So, Google says, "Don't be evil." But it's really, "Can't be evil." Make it, we wanna make it impossible for us to even take down our network at all, and that's why the, like immutable distributed systems, like blockchains and, uh, you know, Tor and all of the... IPFS, all of these different decentralized systems are emerging, and we're inter- we're interacting with them. We're not fully decentralized yet, so... But that's, there- there's like a progression that a lot of apps in the Web3/decentralized web space are moving towards. So... (laughs)

    30. JR

      Okay.

  2. 15:0030:00

    Oh, Kara Swisher. …

    1. JR

      from the left was like, "No, no, no, no, silence them." Like, I, I heard this one woman talking about her kid is listening to Ben Shapiro, and I would love to get Ben Shapiro removed from all platforms. Like-

    2. BO

      Oh, Kara Swisher.

    3. JR

      Yeah, that's her.

    4. BO

      I think, I think that's who it was. She's the Vox reporter.

    5. JR

      Yeah.

    6. BO

      And Vox is interesting 'cause they're, like, smart people-

    7. JR

      Yeah.

    8. BO

      ... but they're also, you know, they sort of embody this ... But, uh, th- their recent article, I don't know, Jamie, if you could, you could find it. Um, it's like, Does Deplatforming Work? Out of Vox, and they, they w-

    9. JR

      We don't need to find that. (laughs)

    10. BO

      Well, I'm just saying that ... No, no, no, no, but the reason I was so happy was because they're referencing similar studies that we reference in our paper. They're starting to be forced to acknowledge that what, that, that the censorship is having serious negative consequences.

    11. JR

      It polarizes this country.

    12. BO

      And, and the ... So, what you were saying before about, you know, people s- their beliefs being re- reinforced after they get banned. You know, they're victims now.

    13. JR

      Yes.

    14. BO

      They, now they believe the thing that they were ranting about. It's called ... So in this, in the literature, it's, it's called certainty, level of certainty. That's what's measured, and, and there's, it's, it's clearly shown that certainty accelerates with deplatforming based on whatever you were thinking before.

    15. JR

      Mm-hmm.

    16. BO

      So isolation and certainty have, um, an overlap.

    17. JR

      Yeah, so if you have an idea, like, especially if it's something as innocuous as Unity 2020, or beneficial ... The idea of unity, I mean, c- come on. It's, like, literally in the title. That's what we're all hoping for. We're u- united as a community, the United States of America, all these different ideas. Let's work together. No, fuck you. You're not a right wing, you're not a left wing. You can't be a part of the problem 'cause you're gonna draw votes away from the people that we think it's imperative that they win. So it, it, it ch- it changes the whole idea of what democracy is, 'cause they're kind of admitting that they have an influence on the way our elections go.

    18. DD

      You know, I mean, and speaking of unity, then you got those people who are out protesting every day, you know, to, to help change and bring people together. But a lot of them are the very ones who will not sit down and talk with the person-

    19. JR

      Yes.

    20. DD

      ... that they're protesting against.

    21. JR

      Yes.

    22. DD

      You know?

    23. JR

      Yes.

    24. DD

      So, how, how badly do they really want unity?

    25. BO

      Well, this happened to us personally.

    26. DD

      Exac- precisely.

    27. JR

      Well, it's happened in universities. That's where it happened first. I started seeing it, I mean, uh, I guess it was like a couple of decades ago. You started to see when someone was a controversial speaker, they would come to a university, and instead of someone debating that person or someone, you know, listening to that person's ideas and picking them apart, instead they were, like, pulling fire alarms and, and shouting people down and screaming at the top of their head in the middle of the auditorium. You're, you'll, they're silencing people's ideas because they feel that their ideas are better, which is-... exactly the opposite of what the Founding Fathers were trying to s- sort of manage when they came up with the First Amendment.

    28. BO

      I mean, we're- I- We're really trying to make this less of an emotional debate, because I think the censorship and speech stuff is v- it's obviously very emotional. You know, people ... We're talking about hate speech. We're talking about a lot of horrible stuff that hurts people personally. And so, you know, the big tech strategy is, "Oh, you know, we- we care about people's feelings, and we wanna hide this information because-"

    29. JR

      Yeah.

    30. BO

      "... it's offensive." But- but we need to remove the emotion and look at this empirically, in terms of what is actually making society more healthy, and what is actually preventing radicalization and violent extremism. There's a difference between radicalization and violent extremism. So if we can prove to big tech that de-platform ... We want them to adopt a free speech policy. I think that's the goal here. We don't expect that Facebook and Google are going away. It's not gonna happen. There's g- gonna be no MySpace of Facebook and Google. They are embedded in the infrastructure of the planet. So they need to change their policy. They need to start open sourcing more code, and w- they need to start adopting more open policies because they ... When they ban, it's all network topology and Whac-A-Mole. You know, you ban it from Facebook, and then it pops up over here, and it's just this whole little interconnected matrix of stuff.

  3. 30:0045:00

    I... It really depends.…

    1. JR

      and everything-

    2. BO

      I... It really depends.

    3. JR

      ... or are they just getting the phone numbers?

    4. BO

      It depends on the specific app. And they all kind of have different, uh, you know, kind of levels of invasiveness.

    5. DD

      And how many people read the entire policy agreement?

    6. JR

      Mm-hmm. How about zero? Right?

    7. DD

      Exactly.

    8. BO

      Yeah.

    9. JR

      Who the fuck's reading that?

    10. BO

      No.

    11. JR

      So, like, if I have you on my phone, and I sign up for Facebook, does it get Bill Ottman plus your phone number, and then they could target you?

    12. BO

      Yeah.

    13. JR

      So they could just send you a text message or-

    14. BO

      They could.

    15. JR

      ... or they can sync up to your Facebook that you have-

    16. BO

      Yeah.

    17. JR

      ... 'cause your app, they're, they're aware that we're communicating with each other, 'cause we both have each other's phone number.

    18. DD

      Well, it's like, you know, you go on Facebook and there's some sponsored ad there. And it, and it has a list of your friends that like this ad.

    19. JR

      Right. Yeah.

    20. DD

      It's like, "I didn't know she liked that."

    21. JR

      Yes.

    22. DD

      "Well, how, how do they know she liked it?" And how do they know that, that you might like it because so-and-so liked it?

    23. JR

      Yes. D- Let me ask you this, 'cause this is a big one that everybody always wants to know.

    24. BO

      All right.

    25. JR

      Sometimes we're talking about stuff, and then I'll, I'll hear an ad.

    26. DD

      Boom. Yeah. (laughs)

    27. JR

      See an ad for the thing we're talking about.

    28. BO

      Yeah.

    29. JR

      Like, Jamie and I have talked about this many times, where it's like, there is no way this a- this random ad would have popped up just on its own. It seems like it has to ... They have to be listening.

    30. BO

      So, I wish Lex had asked Zuck this question, because this is a key question that, honestly, I'm not gonna claim to know. I mean, we don't have access to their source code, so we do not know, and they've denied it repeatedly. Um, I think that the geo can trick you a lot of time into thinking that they're listening, and, you know, different associations they're able to make in the back end. But I, I don't know the answer, but I, I know thousands of stories like what you're saying, and I feel like they're just skirting around it, and I would not at all be surprised. But again, if we can't see the source code, we do not know.

  4. 45:001:00:00

    Yeah. …

    1. JR

      iPhones, apparently there's, like, some signal-

    2. DD

      Yeah.

    3. JR

      ... that's being sent with Find My-

    4. DD

      Constant chip.

    5. JR

      Yeah. So that alone is a little bit of a red flag, right?

    6. BO

      Yeah, I mean, Apple is- is ... They try to have this privacy argument, and it's so shocking to me that they try to push that. Like, "Oh, you know, we're not gonna let the FBI in. Like, trust us." And look, Apple makes beautiful products. Everybody knows it. They're the best designers in the world.

    7. JR

      What do you use?

    8. BO

      I- I use stripped Android.

    9. DD

      (laughs)

    10. BO

      And I'm gonna start using this because I can ... This can be my computer as well. So I'll ... But I'll, you know, I'll use both, but I- I'm- I'm playing with all the options right now. But, like, I li- I like to use Linux as my desktop computer.

    11. JR

      Can I see what you use?

    12. BO

      Um.

    13. JR

      That's your phone?

    14. BO

      This is, this is my phone. This- this is a ... Well, this is just Android.

    15. JR

      That's just regular Android? It's not even stripped?

    16. BO

      This is an un- non-stripped version.

    17. JR

      So when a privacy guy is having a phone that's tracking him everywhere he goes-

    18. BO

      I have, dude, every ... We're all in the midst of this world. I have fi- ... Look at me.

    19. JR

      Yeah, you got-

    20. BO

      I mean, come on, you gotta give me credit-

    21. JR

      ... multiple phones.

    22. BO

      ... for having five different phones.

    23. JR

      Do- do you have different phones because you have to check how mines is on different operating systems?

    24. BO

      Dif- ... I'm not doing m- the ... I mean, I'm not doing all of our QA. But, like, I have Linux devices, Windows devices, Apple devices. I defini- ... I use it all. So-

    25. JR

      But you use an Android as your main phone?

    26. BO

      Yes.

    27. JR

      Why do you do that?

    28. BO

      I do that because Android is a- is at least open source in its base function, so I will ... Uh, as ... Over Apple, I will choose Android because, like we see with graphene, you can fork Android and create a stripped down version. Now, it is absolutely imperative to ... I need to get a graphene, pure graphene version. That's on my list of things to do. I've got, you know, there's a ClearOS here, which is, uh-

    29. JR

      What's that?

    30. BO

      That's, uh ...

  5. 1:00:001:13:24

    Right. …

    1. DD

      I mean, look, look at it this way. Say 25, 30 years ago, uh, insurance companies were not paying for acupuncture. "Oh, that's, you know, nonsense. It's, uh, what do you call it, a placebo or something."

    2. JR

      Right.

    3. DD

      Uh, now they do. A- and now they see value in it. Well, Chinese people have been using that for 2,000 years. Would they still be using it 2,000 years later if it wasn't working? So now, now we're accepting, you know, some Eastern culture. Now we're, you know... W- when our doctor does not give us what we, uh, hope w- will cure us for our cancer, our diabetes, our whatever, we go the holistic.... route. And we've found some, some pretty amazing results. And that's what, you know, Minds is doing, the holistic, uh, r- you know, um, approach, by giving everybody a platform to, to, to, to share their information, like you just shared about the cabbage juice. You know, somebody hears this podcast and goes out and tries cabbage juice and it clears up their wife's, uh, ailment or something like that.

    4. JR

      And this is a good, uh, subject to talk about now, because we just got through the pandemic, and that was one of the things that was suppressed, was information about methods of treating COVID. I mean, there was... It was a giant issue, where if you talked about whether it was hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin or whatever you would talk about, even vitamins. We're talking about, like, the difference between the COVID results of people that were vitamin D insufficient versus people that had sufficient levels. It's a giant difference.

    5. DD

      Mm-hmm.

    6. JR

      But if you talked about that, you would get in trouble for disinformation or misinformation, and you would get e- either shadow banned or outrightly banned. I mean, there were people that were banned from social networks for suggesting that people who are vaccinated can still spread COVID. That turns out to be an absolute fact now.

    7. DD

      Yeah.

    8. JR

      But if you said that eight months ago, nine months ago, instead of having this conversation and having medical experts debate it, and people that understand it and don't understand it, so ask questions, and the people t- who are f- following the, the standard narrative, um, uh, th- they express themselves, and then people that have alternative ideas express themselves, and we find out what's right and what's wrong.

    9. DD

      Uh, somebody expressed th- that, uh, it could be treated with bleach, right?

    10. JR

      W- wasn't that Trump?

    11. DD

      (laughs)

    12. JR

      Yeah, he said, like-

    13. DD

      (laughs)

    14. JR

      ... uh, the... Yeah, like an infusion of bleach. (laughs)

    15. BO

      Yeah, I mean, there shou- there should be warnings. And, you know, um, but imagine if rather than a fact-check warning, like, you know, "These three think tanks said that this is false," it... What, what if you could actually see a visualization of the debate that showed both sides and gave you, like, a probability score or something on the piece of content, as opposed to saying, like, black or white...

    16. JR

      Well, who checks the fact-checkers?

    17. BO

      Yeah, that- that's what you need.

    18. JR

      That's, that's, the problem. There's, there's a lot of fact-checkers that are just full of shit. Like, there's a lot of things that are, like, mostly true or mostly false, and you look into it and you're like, "Fuck you, this is not mostly false." You guys are just mad.

    19. DD

      It's either false or true.

    20. JR

      Yeah, yeah.

    21. DD

      It can't be mostly.

    22. BO

      Well...

    23. DD

      It's like, it's like, you know, a multiple statement.

    24. JR

      Well, that's debatable.

    25. DD

      Somebody who's been sort of pregnant.

    26. JR

      Right. (laughs)

    27. DD

      I mean, either you're pregnant or you're not, you know?

    28. JR

      But if someone is... If there's multiple statements about an issue and some of them are correct and some of them are not-

    29. BO

      Well-

    30. JR

      ... then it would be, like, mostly true.

Episode duration: 1:54:14

Install uListen for AI-powered chat & search across the full episode — Get Full Transcript

Transcript of episode rMNW-orIpU8

Get more out of YouTube videos.

High quality summaries for YouTube videos. Accurate transcripts to search & find moments. Powered by ChatGPT & Claude AI.

Add to Chrome