Skip to content
Lex Fridman PodcastLex Fridman Podcast

Konstantin Batygin: Planet 9 and the Edge of Our Solar System | Lex Fridman Podcast #201

Konstantin Batygin is a planetary astrophysicist at Caltech. Please support this podcast by checking out our sponsors: - Squarespace: https://lexfridman.com/squarespace and use code LEX to get 10% off - Literati: https://literati.com/lex - Onnit: https://lexfridman.com/onnit to get up to 10% off - National Instruments (NI): https://www.ni.com/perspectives EPISODE LINKS: Konstantin's Twitter https://twitter.com/kbatygin Konstantin's Website https://www.konstantinbatygin.com/ PODCAST INFO: Podcast website: https://lexfridman.com/podcast Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lwqZIr Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2nEwCF8 RSS: https://lexfridman.com/feed/podcast/ Full episodes playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLrAXtmErZgOdP_8GztsuKi9nrraNbKKp4 Clips playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLrAXtmErZgOeciFP3CBCIEElOJeitOr41 OUTLINE: 0:00 - Introduction 1:18 - Overview of our Solar System 16:16 - What is the Oort Cloud? 21:11 - Life in the interstellar medium 22:44 - Are there aliens out there? 25:23 - How unique is Earth? 28:04 - Did Jupiter destroy early planets? 34:18 - How hard is it to simulate the Universe? 38:50 - Quantum mechanics in evolution of objects in the Solar system 43:17 - Simulating the first formations around the Sun 49:04 - Will it be possible to simulate the full history of the Solar System? 51:24 - How far should we go with the simulation? 53:45 - Increasing immersion in video games 1:00:10 - What is Planet Nine? 1:06:39 - The origin of life 1:09:03 - Evidence of Planet Nine 1:11:33 - Discovery of Neptune 1:12:43 - When will we find Planet Nine? 1:15:22 - Planet Nine throws rocks into the Kuiper Belt 1:19:17 - Could Planet Nine be a primordial black hole? 1:29:21 - Commercial space revolution boosts science and the human condition 1:36:48 - Solving sex in space 1:37:26 - Would humans evolve if we couldn't see the stars? 1:43:09 - Military funding and science 1:47:13 - Is Oumuamua space junk from a distant alien civilization? 2:00:35 - Wild ideas create the future 2:08:24 - The perfect place to die 2:10:05 - Greatest song of all time 2:16:35 - Music enables science for Konstantin 2:18:53 - Music practice tips for busy people 2:22:43 - Memories of 1990s Russia 2:29:15 - Advice for young people 2:35:11 - Meaning of life SOCIAL: - Twitter: https://twitter.com/lexfridman - LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/lexfridman - Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lexfridman - Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lexfridman - Medium: https://medium.com/@lexfridman - Reddit: https://reddit.com/r/lexfridman - Support on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/lexfridman

Lex FridmanhostKonstantin Batyginguest
Jul 19, 20212h 39mWatch on YouTube ↗

EVERY SPOKEN WORD

  1. 0:001:18

    Introduction

    1. LF

      The following is a conversation with Konstantin Batygin, planetary astrophysicist at Caltech, interested in, among other things, the search for the distant but mysterious Planet Nine in the outer regions of our solar system. A quick mention of our sponsors: Squarespace, Literati, Onnit, and NI. Check them out in the description to support this podcast. As a side note, let me say that our little sun is orbited by not just a few planets in the planetary region, but trillions of objects in the Kuiper Belt and the Oort Cloud that extends over three light years out. This, to me, is amazing, since Proxima Centauri, the closer star to our sun, is only 4.2 light years away. And all of it is mostly covered in darkness. When I get a chance to go out swimming in the ocean far from the shore, I'm sometimes overcome by the terrifying and the exciting feeling of not knowing what's there in the deep darkness. That's how I feel about the edge of our solar system. One day, I hope humans will travel there, or at the very least, AI systems that carry the flame of human consciousness. This is the Lex Fridman podcast and here's my conversation with Konstantin Batygin.

  2. 1:1816:16

    Overview of our Solar System

    1. LF

      What is Planet Nine?

    2. KB

      Planet Nine is an object that we believe lives in the solar system beyond the orbit of Neptune. It orbits the sun with a period of about 10,000 years and, uh, is about five Earth masses.

    3. LF

      So that's a hypothesized object.

    4. KB

      That's right.

    5. LF

      There's some evidence, uh, for this kind of object. There's a bunch of different explanations. Can you give, like, an overview of the planets in our solar system, how many are there, what do we know and not know about them at a high level?

    6. KB

      All right. That sounds like a good plan. So look, the solar system basically is comprised of two parts, the inner and the outer solar system. The inner solar system has the planets Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars. Now, Mercury is about 40% of the orbital separation of- where the Earth is, is closer to the sun, Venus is about 70%. Uh, then Mars is about 160% o- further away from the sun than is the Earth. These planets that we, uh, one of them we occupy, right, are pretty small, okay? They're, to leading order, sort of heavily overgrown asteroids, if you will.

    7. LF

      (laughs) Okay.

    8. KB

      Um, and this is- this becomes evident when you move out further in the solar system and encounter Jupiter, which is 316 Earth masses, right, ten times the size. Um, you know, and Saturn is another huge one, 90 Earth masses, at about ten times, uh, the separation from, uh, the sun as is the earth. And then you have Uranus and Neptune at 20 and 30 respectively. For a long time, that is where the kind of massive part of the solar system ended. But what we've learned in the last 30 years is that beyond Neptune, there is this expansive field of icy debris, a second icy asteroid belt, uh, in the solar system. A lot of people have heard of the asteroid belt which lives be- between Mars and Jupiter, right? Like, that's a pretty common thing that people like to imagine and draw on lunchboxes and stuff.

    9. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    10. KB

      But beyond Neptune, there's a much more massive and much more radially, uh, expansive, uh, field of debris. Pluto, by the way, it belongs to that second, you know, icy asteroid belt which we call the Kuiper Belt. It's just a big object within that population of bodies.

    11. LF

      Oh, Pluto the planet?

    12. KB

      Pluto, the- the dwarf planet, the former planet, you know?

    13. LF

      Why is Pluto not a planet anymore?

    14. KB

      I mean, it's tiny. We used to-

    15. LF

      So size matters when it comes to planets?

    16. KB

      Oh, 100%. 100%.

    17. LF

      All right.

    18. KB

      It's, uh, actually a fascinating story. When Pluto was discovered in 1930, the th- the reason it was discovered in the first place is because astronomers at the time were looking for a seven Earth mass planet somewhere beyond Neptune, okay? It was hypothesized that such an object exists. When they found something, they interpreted that as a seven Earth mass planet, and immediately revised its mass downward because they couldn't resolve the object with the telescope. So it looked like a, just a point mass, you know, star-

    19. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    20. KB

      ... rather than a physical disk. And they said, "Well, maybe it's not seven, maybe it's one," right? And then, sort of over the next, um, you know, I guess 40 years, Pluto's mass kept getting revised down, down- downwards, downwards, downwards, until, uh, it was realized that it's, like, 500 times less massive than the earth.

    21. LF

      Yeah.

    22. KB

      Right? I mean, like, Pluto's surface area is almost perfectly equal to the surface area of Russia-

    23. LF

      Hm.

    24. KB

      ... actually. And, you know, Russia is big but it's not a planet.

    25. LF

      (laughs)

    26. KB

      Uh, well, I mean, actually, we can, we can touch more on that-

    27. LF

      That's-

    28. KB

      ... in a little bit ...

    29. LF

      ... that's another discussion. Uh, so in, in some sense, early in the century, Pluto represented kind of our ignorance about the edges of the solar system, and perhaps Planet Nine is the thing that represents our ignorance about now, the modern set of ignorances about the edges of our solar system.

    30. KB

      That's a good way to put it.

  3. 16:1621:11

    What is the Oort Cloud?

    1. LF

      Okay. You mentioned the Kuiper Belt. What's the Oort cloud? If you look at the Neptune orbit as, uh, one, then the Kuiper Belt's like 1.3 out there.

    2. KB

      Yeah.

    3. LF

      And then we get farther and farther into the darkness.

    4. KB

      Sure.

    5. LF

      What, what's the Oort cloud?

    6. KB

      So, okay, you've got the kind of main co- Kuiper Belt which is about say 1.3, 1.5. Um, then you have something called the scattered disc, which is kind of an extension of the Kuiper Belt. It's a bunch of these long, uh, very elliptical orbits that hug the orbit of Neptune but come out very far. So that, the scattered disc, um, with the current census, like the, some of the longest, uh, orbits we know of, um, have a semi-major axis, so half the orbit length roughly speaking of about 1,000, 1,000 times the distance between the Earth and the sun.

    7. LF

      Wow.

    8. KB

      Now, if you keep moving out, okay, eventually once you're at sort of, you know, 10,000 to 100,000 roughly, that's where the Oort cloud is. Now the Oort cloud is a distinct population of icy bodies and it's distinct from the Kuiper Belt. It's, in fact, it's so expansive that it ends roughly halfway between us and the next star. Um, its, its edge is just dictated by w- to what extent does the solar gravity reach.

    9. LF

      Solar gravity reaches that far?

    10. KB

      Yeah.

    11. LF

      So it has to... Wow.

    12. KB

      Yeah.

    13. LF

      (laughs)

    14. KB

      So, in fact the-

    15. LF

      Imagining this is a little bit overwhelming. So there's-

    16. KB

      It can, it can be.

    17. LF

      ... like a giant, like vast, icy rock thingy.

    18. KB

      It's like a sphere. It's like, you know, it's like a s- almost spherical structure that engulfs, that encircles the sun, and all the long period comets come from the Oort cloud. They come... The way that they appear, I mean, for already, I don't know, hundreds of years we've been detecting occasionally like a comet will come in and-... it come, seemingly comes out of nowhere.

    19. LF

      Yeah.

    20. KB

      The reason these long-period comets appear, they've very- on very, very long time scales, right? These Oort cloud objects that are sitting, you know, 30,000 times as far away from the sun as is the Earth, actually interact with the gravity of the galaxy, the tide, uh, effectively the tide that the galaxy exerts upon them, and their orbits slowly change and they elongate-

    21. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    22. KB

      ... to the point where once they, their closest approach to the sun starts to reach a critical distance where ice starts to sublimate, then we discover them as comets because then the ice comes off of them.

    23. LF

      Wow.

    24. KB

      They look beautiful in the night sky, et cetera. But they're all coming from-

    25. LF

      They're-

    26. KB

      ... you know, really, really far away.

    27. LF

      So, uh, is there, are any of them coming our way from collisions? Like how many collisions are there? Or is there a bunch of space for them to move around?

    28. KB

      Yeah, there's zero. Like, they, it's completely collisionless. Out there, the physical radii of objects are so small compared to the distance between them, right, it's just, it is truly a collisionless, uh, environment. I don't know, the, I think that probably in the age of the solar system, there have literally been zero collisions in the Oort cloud.

    29. LF

      Wow. When you like draw a picture of the solar system, everything's really close together so that everything I guess here is f- spaced far apart. Do rogue planets like fly in every once in a while and join? Not rogue planets but rogue objects from out there?

    30. KB

      Oh, sure. Oh, sure.

  4. 21:1122:44

    Life in the interstellar medium

    1. KB

      thing.

    2. LF

      Let me ask you about the, the millions of objects that are part of the Kuiper Belt and the part of the Oort cloud. Do you think some of them have primitive life? Because it kind of makes me sad (laughs) if there's like primitive life there and they're just kind of like lonely out there in space.

    3. KB

      Yeah.

    4. LF

      Like how many of them do you think have life, like bacterial life?

    5. KB

      Probably a negligible amount. Zero, you know, like zero with like a plus on top.

    6. LF

      Right.

    7. KB

      Uh, right? So-

    8. LF

      Zero plus plus.

    9. KB

      Yeah. (laughs)

    10. LF

      (laughs)

    11. KB

      Um, if, so, you know, if you and I took a little trip to the interstellar medium, I think we would develop cancer and die, uh, real fast, right?

    12. LF

      That's rough, huh?

    13. KB

      Yeah, it's, uh, pretty hostile radiation environment. Um, you don't actually have to go to the interstellar medium, you just have to leave the Earth's magnetic field to, um, and then you're not doing so well suddenly.

    14. LF

      (laughs) Yeah.

    15. KB

      So, you know, this, this idea of, you know, life kind of traveling between places, it's not, it's not entirely implausible, but you, you really have to twist I think a lot of parameters. One of the problems we have is we don't actually know how life originates, right? So, it's kind of a second order question of, of survival in the interstellar medium and, and how resilient it is because we, we think you require water, but, and that's certainly the case for the Earth-

    16. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    17. KB

      ... but, you know, we, uh, we really don't know for sure. That said,

  5. 22:4425:23

    Are there aliens out there?

    1. KB

      I will argue that the question of like are there aliens out there is a very boring question.

    2. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    3. KB

      Because the answer is of course there are.

    4. LF

      (laughs)

    5. KB

      Right? I mean, like, we know that there are planets around almost every star.

    6. LF

      (laughs)

    7. KB

      Um, of course there, of course there are other life form... Life is not some specific thing that happened on the Earth and that's it, right? Just, that's a statistical impossibility.

    8. LF

      Yeah.

    9. KB

      Um...

    10. LF

      Yeah, but the, the difficult question is before even the fact that we don't know how life or- originates, I don't think we even know what life is, like definitionally.

    11. KB

      Yeah.

    12. LF

      Like formalizing a kind of picture of, in terms of the mechanism we would use to, to search for life out there, or even when we're on a planet to say, "Is this life?" (laughs) "Is this rock that just moved from where it was yesterday life?" (laughs) Or, or maybe not even a rock-

    13. KB

      Life's-

    14. LF

      ... something else.

    15. KB

      ... I gotta tell you, I wanna know what life is.

    16. LF

      (laughs)

    17. KB

      Okay? And I want you to show me.

    18. LF

      (laughs)

    19. KB

      Uh... (laughs)

    20. LF

      (laughs) I think there's a song to basically accompany every single (laughs) thing-

    21. KB

      Yeah.

    22. LF

      ... we talk about today, and, and probably s- uh, half of them are love songs. Um, and somehow we'll integrate George Michael into the whole thing. Okay. So your intuition is l- there's life everywhere in our universe. Do you think there's intelligent life out there?

    23. KB

      I think it's entirely plausible. I mean, uh, it's entirely plausible, um, you know, I think, I think there's intelligent life on Earth. Um, and-

    24. LF

      So yeah, taking that, like say whatever this thing we got on Earth, whether it's dolphins or humans, say that's intelligent.

    25. KB

      Uh, definitely dolphins. I mean-

    26. LF

      Yes.

    27. KB

      ... have you seen the dolphins?

    28. LF

      Well, they do some cruel stuff to each other. So, if cruelty (laughs) -

    29. KB

      (laughs)

    30. LF

      ... is a, is a definition of intelligence, th- they're pretty good.

  6. 25:2328:04

    How unique is Earth?

    1. LF

      is if we have intelligent life here on Earth, if you take dolphins, pigs, humans, from the perspective of, like, planetary science-

    2. KB

      Mm.

    3. LF

      ... how unique is Earth?

    4. KB

      Okay, so Earth is not a com- common outcome of the planet formation process. Um, it's probably a, something on the order of maybe a 1% effect. And by Earth, I mean, not just-

    5. LF

      Small.

    6. KB

      ... an Earth-mass planet.

    7. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    8. KB

      Okay? I mean the architecture of the solar system that allows the Earth to exist in, in its kind of very temperate, um, way. One thing to understand, uh, and this is, this is pretty crucial, uh, right, is that the Earth itself formed well after the gas disk that formed the giant planets, um, well, had already dissipated. You see, stars start out with, you know, the star and then a disk of gas and dust that encircles it, okay? From this disk of gas and dust, big planets can emerge.

    9. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    10. KB

      And we have over the last, uh, you know, two, three decades discovered thousands of extra-solar planets-

    11. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    12. KB

      ... planet in orbit around other stars. What we see is that, uh, many of them are, you know, have these expansive hydrogen-helium atmospheres. The fact that the Earth, uh, doesn't is deeply connected to the fact that Earth took about 100 million years to form. So, we missed that, you know, train, so to speak, to get that hydrogen-helium atmosphere. That's why actually we can see the sky, right? That's why the sky is, uh, well, at least in most places, that's why the, the atmosphere is not completely opaque. Um, with that, you know, kinda thinking in mind, I, I would argue that we're getting the kinda emergent pictures that the Earth is, is not, you know, everywhere, right? We, there's sort of the sci-fi view of things where we go to some other star and we just land on random planets and they're all Earth-like. That's totally not true. But the, even a low probability event, even if you imagine that Earth is a one in a million, or one in a, you know, one in 10 million occurrence, there are 10^12 stars in the galaxy.

    13. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    14. KB

      Right? So you just, you always win by-

    15. LF

      (laughs)

    16. KB

      ... by-

    17. LF

      Large numbers.

    18. KB

      That's right, by supply.

    19. LF

      They save you.

  7. 28:0434:18

    Did Jupiter destroy early planets?

    1. LF

      Well, you've, uh, hypothesized that there, our solar system once possessed a population of short-period planets that were destroyed by the evil Jupiter-

    2. KB

      Mm-hmm.

    3. LF

      ... uh, migrating through, uh, the s- the solar nebula. Can you explain?

    4. KB

      If I was to say what was the k- kind of the key outcome of searches for extra-solar planets, it is that most stars are encircled by short-period planets that are, um, you know, a few Earth masses, right? So, a few times bigger than the Earth, um, and have orbital periods that kind of range from days to, to weeks, okay?

    5. LF

      Oh, wow.

    6. KB

      Now, if you go a- and ask the solar system, "What's in our region," right, in that region, it's completely empty, right? It's just, it's astonishingly hollow. And think, you know, from ... The sun is not some, you know, special star that decided that it was going to form the, the solar system. So I think, you know, the natural thing to assume is t- is that the same processes of planet formation that occurred everywhere else also occurred in the solar system. Following this logic, it's not implausible to imagine that the solar system once possessed a system of intra-Mercurian, like, you know, compact system of, of planets. So then, we asked ourselves, "Would such a system survive to this day?" And the answer is no. Uh, at least our calculations, uh, suggest that it's highly unlikely because of the formation of Jupiter. And Jupiter's primordial kind of wandering through the solar system would have sent this collisional field of debris that would've pushed that system of planets onto the sun.

    7. LF

      So was Jupiter, with its primordial wandering, w- what did, what did Jupiter look like? Like, why was it wandering?

    8. KB

      Yeah.

    9. LF

      It, it didn't have the orbit it has today?

    10. KB

      Uh, we're pretty certain that giant planets like Jupiter, when they form, they migrate. The reason they migrate is, um, you know, on a detailed level, perhaps difficult to explain, but you know, just in a qualitative sense, uh, they form in this fluid disk of gas and dust.

    11. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    12. KB

      So it's kind of like thinking if I plop down a raft somewhere in the ocean, will it stay in the, where you plop it down, or will it kind of get carried around? It's not really a good analogy because it's not like Jupiter's being advected by the currents of, you know, gas and dust, but the way it...... it migrates is it carves out a hole in the, in the disk and then, uh, through, by interacting with the disk gravitationally, right, it can change its orbit. The fact that-

    13. LF

      I'm interested.

    14. KB

      ... the solar system has both Jupiter and Saturn here complicates things a lot, right? Because it's, you have to solve the problem of the evolution of the gas disk, the evolution of Jupiter's orbit in the gas disk, plus evolution of Saturn's, and their mutual interaction. The common outcome of solving that problem, though, is pretty easy to explain. Jupiter forms, its orbit shrinks, and then once Saturn forms, its orbit catches up, basically, to the orbit of Jupiter and they both come out.

    15. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    16. KB

      So there's this inward-outward pattern of Jupiter's, uh, early motion that happens sort of within the fir- within the last million years of the lifetime of the solar system's primordial disk. So Ju- while this is happening, if our calculations are correct, uh, which I think they are, you can destroy these in- this inner system of, you know, few Earth-mass planets.

    17. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    18. KB

      And then, in the aftermath of all this violence, you form the terrestrial planets, right?

    19. LF

      Wh- where would they come from in that case? So y- so Jupiter clears out the space.

    20. KB

      Mm-hmm.

    21. LF

      And then there's a g- a few terrestrial planets that come in, and th- those come in from the, from the disk somewhere? Like one of the-

    22. KB

      So they-

    23. LF

      ... larger objects?

    24. KB

      Yeah. They w- what actually happens in these calculations is you leave behind a rather mass-depleted-

    25. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    26. KB

      ... like, remnant, uh, remnant disk.

    27. LF

      Gotcha.

    28. KB

      Only a couple Earth masses.

    29. LF

      Yeah.

    30. KB

      So, um-

  8. 34:1838:50

    How hard is it to simulate the Universe?

    1. KB

    2. LF

      How hard is it to simulate all of the things that we've been talking about, each of the things we've been talking about? And maybe one day all of the things we've been talking about and beyond? Meaning, like from the initial primordial solar system, you know, bunch of disks with, I don't know, billions, trillions of objects in them. Like simulate that such that you eventually get a Jupiter and a Saturn, and then eventually you get the Jupiter and the Saturn that clear out a disk, change the gravitational landscape, then Earth pops up, like that whole thing. And then be able to do that for every other system in the, uh, every other star in the galaxy, and then be able to do that for other galaxies as well.

    3. KB

      Um, yeah. So, (laughs) look-

    4. LF

      'Cause maybe start from the smallest simulation-

    5. KB

      Yeah.

    6. LF

      ... like what is actually being done today. I mean, even the smallest simulation is probably super, super diff- even just like one object in the Kuiper belt is probably super difficult to simulate.

    7. KB

      I mean, I think it's super easy.

    8. LF

      (laughs)

    9. KB

      I mean, like, it's-

    10. LF

      Okay.

    11. KB

      ... it's just not that hard. Um-

    12. LF

      Yeah.

    13. KB

      ... but, um, you know, let's, let's ask the most, kind of basic problem, okay? So, the problem of having a star and something in orbit of it. That-

    14. LF

      Yeah.

    15. KB

      ... you don't need a simulation for. Like, you- you can just write that down on a piece of paper.

    16. LF

      Mm-hmm. There's gravity, what, like ... Yeah, I guess, I guess it's important to try to, uh, you know, one way to simulate objects in our solar system is to build a universe from scratch.

    17. KB

      Okay. We'll get to building the universe from scratch-

    18. LF

      Okay.

    19. KB

      ... in a sec, um, but let me just kind of go through the hierarchy of what, you know, what-

    20. LF

      Yeah.

    21. KB

      ... what we do.

    22. LF

      Two objects.

    23. KB

      Right, it's two objects, analytically solvable, like we can figure it out very easily if you just ... You don't even, I don't think you, yeah, you don't need to know calculus. Uh, it helps to know calculus, but you don't necessarily need to know calculus. Um, three objects that are gravitationally interacting, the solution is chaotic. Doesn't matter how many simulations you do, you, the answer loses meaning after, um, after some time.

    24. LF

      I feel like that is a metaphor for dating as well, but go on.

    25. KB

      (laughs) Now, look-

    26. LF

      I apologize.

    27. KB

      Yeah. So, so, the fact that you go from analytically solvable to unpredictable, you know, when you are-... you know, when your simulation goes from two u- bodies to three bodies, should immediately tell you that the exercise of trying to engineer a calculation where you form the solar, entire solar system from scratch and hope to have some predictive answer is, is a futile one. Right? We will never, uh, succeed at such a simulation.

    28. LF

      I feel like, sorry, just to clarify, you mean, like, explicitly having a clear equation that generalizes the, the whole process enough to be able to make a prediction?

    29. KB

      Mm-hmm.

    30. LF

      Or do you mean actually, like, literally simulating the objects is a hopeless pursuit once it increases beyond three?

  9. 38:5043:17

    Quantum mechanics in evolution of objects in the Solar system

    1. KB

      the solar system.

    2. LF

      You mentioned quantum mechanics.

    3. KB

      Mm-hmm.

    4. LF

      And we're, we're talking about cosmic scale objects. You've talked about that the evolution of astrophysical discs can be modeled with, uh, Schrodinger's equation.

    5. KB

      I sure did.

    6. LF

      W- why (laughs) ?

    7. KB

      (laughs)

    8. LF

      Like, how does quantum mechanics, uh, become relevant at, when you, uh, consider the evolution of objects in a solar system?

    9. KB

      Yeah. Well, let me take a, take a step back and just say it, like, I remember being, you know, utterly confused by quantum mechanics when, when I first learned it. And the Schrodinger equation, which is kind of the parent equation of, of that whole field, you know, seems to come out of nowhere, right? The way that, uh, the way that I was sort of explaining it, I remember asking, you know, my professor, I was like, "But, but where does it come from?" He said, like, "Well, just, just, like, don't worry about it, and just, like, calculate the hydrogen, you know, energy levels." Right? So, the, it's like, I could do all the problems, I just did not have any intuition for, for where this parent, you know, super important equation came from. Now, down the line, I was, remember I was preparing for my own lecture, and I was trying to understand how waves, um, travel in self-gravitating discs.

    10. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    11. KB

      So, uh, you know, again, there's a very broad theory that's already developed, but I was looking for some simpler way to explain it, really, for the purposes of teaching class. And so, I, I thought, "Okay, what if I just imagine a disc as an infinite, uh, number of concentric circles, right? That interact with th- with each other gravitationally." That's a problem in some sense that, um, I can solve using methods from, like, the s- late 1700s, right?

    12. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    13. KB

      I can write down Hamiltonian ... Well, I can write down the energy function, basically, of their, their interactions. And what I found is that when you take the continuum limit, when you go from discrete circles that are talking to each other gravitationally to a continuum disc, suddenly this gravitational interaction among them, right, the, the governing equation becomes the Schrodinger equation.

    14. LF

      Yeah.

    15. KB

      And I had to think about that for a little bit.

    16. LF

      Did you just unify (laughs) -

    17. KB

      (laughs)

    18. LF

      ... quantum mechanics and gravity?

    19. KB

      No. This is not the same thing as, like, you know, fusing relativity and quantum mechanics, but it did, uh, it (laughs) it did get me thinking a little bit. Uh, so the fact that waves in astrophysical discs behave just like wave functions of, of particles is kind of, like, an interesting analogy, because for me it's easier to imagine waves traveling through, you know, astrophysical discs, or really just sheets of paper.

    20. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    21. KB

      And the reason this is, um, that analogy exists is because there's actually nothing quantum about the Schrodinger equation. The Schrodinger equation is just a wave equation, and all of the interpretation that comes from it is quantum, but the equation itself is not a quantum being, uh-

    22. LF

      So you can use it to model waves. It's w-

    23. KB

      Yes.

    24. LF

      It's not turtles, it's waves all the way down, and you can pick which level you pick the w- the wave at, uh, so it could be at the solar system level that you can use it.

    25. KB

      Right. And also, it actually provides, uh, a pretty neat calculational tool because, um, as r- as I ... It's, it's difficult, so we just talked about simulations, but it's difficult to simulate the behavior of astrophysical discs on time scales that are in between a few orbits and their entire evolution.

    26. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    27. KB

      So, it's over a time scale of a few orbits, you have, you do a hydrodynamic, you know, simulation-... right? You do, um, that basically, that's something that you can do on a modern computer, on a timescale of say a week.

    28. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    29. KB

      When it comes to their evolution over their entire lifetime, you don't hope to resolve the orbits. You just kind of hope to understand how the system behaves

    30. NA

      Mm-hmm.

  10. 43:1749:04

    Simulating the first formations around the Sun

    1. KB

    2. LF

      That's fascinating. By the way, the astrophysical disks, how, uh, w- what are they? How broad is this definition?

    3. KB

      Okay. So astrophysical disks span a huge, uh, huge amount of ranges. Um, they start maybe at the smallest scale. They start with actually Kuiper Belt objects. Some Kuiper Belt objects have rings, okay?

    4. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    5. KB

      So that's maybe the smallest example of an astrophysical disk. You got this little potato-shaped asteroid-

    6. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    7. KB

      ... you know, which is, you know, sort of the size of LA or something, and around it is, are some rings-

    8. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    9. KB

      ... of icy matter. That object is a small astrophysical disk. Then you have Saturn-

    10. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    11. KB

      ... and rings of Saturn. You have the next set of scale, you have the solar system itself when it was forming, you have a disk. Then you have black hole disks. Uh, you have galaxies. Disks are super common in the universe, and the reason is that stuff rotates.

    12. LF

      (laughs)

    13. KB

      (laughs) Right? I mean, that's-

    14. LF

      Gravity works.

    15. KB

      Yeah.

    16. LF

      So, uh, and th- those rings could be the material that, uh, composes those rings, could be... it could be gas, it could be solid, it could be anything?

    17. KB

      That's right. So, uh, the disk that made... from which the planets emerged was predominantly hydrogen and helium gas. On the other hand, the rings of Saturn are made up of, you know, icicle, ice, little like ice cubes this big, about a centimeter across.

    18. LF

      That sounds refreshing. So, uh, that's incredible.

    19. KB

      (laughs)

    20. LF

      Hydrogen and helium gas. So, in the beginning, it was just hydrogen and helium-

    21. KB

      Uh-huh.

    22. LF

      ... around the sun. How does that lead to the first formations of solid objects-

    23. KB

      Mm-hmm.

    24. LF

      ... uh, in terms of simulation?

    25. KB

      Okay. Here's the story. Um, so you like... have you ever been to the desert? (laughs) Okay.

    26. LF

      Yes. I've been to the Death Valley, and actually it was, uh, terrifying just as... total tangent. I'm distracting you.

    27. KB

      Mm-hmm. No problem.

    28. LF

      But I was, uh, uh, driving through it, and I was really surprised because it was at first hot and then as it was getting into the evening, there's this huge thunderstorm. Like-

    29. KB

      Yeah.

    30. LF

      ... it was raining, and it got freezing cold. Like what the hell's... it was the apocalypse.

  11. 49:0451:24

    Will it be possible to simulate the full history of the Solar System?

    1. LF

      So, do you think one day it will be possible to simulate the full history that took our solar system to what it is today?

    2. KB

      Yes, and it will be useless. (laughs)

    3. LF

      Okay. (laughs) So you don't think your story, many of the ideas that you have about Jupiter clear in the space, like retelling that story in high resolution is not that important?

    4. KB

      I actually think it's important, but at every stage you have to, you have to simul- you have to design your experiments, your, your numerical computer experiments, so that they test some specific aspect of that evolution.

    5. LF

      Got it.

    6. KB

      Um, I am not a proponent of doing huge simulations, because, um, even if we forget the information theory aspect of not being able-

    7. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    8. KB

      ... to simulate in full detail the universe, because if you do, then you, you have made an actual universe, it's not a simulation, right? By... Simulation is, in some sense, a compression-

    9. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    10. KB

      ... of information, so therefore you loo- must lose detail. But that point aside, if we are able to simulate the entire history of the solar system in excruciating detail, I mean, it'll be cool, but it's not gonna be any different from observing it.

    11. LF

      Right.

    12. KB

      Right? Because theoretical understanding, which is what ultimately I'm interested in, um, comes from taking complex things and reducing them down to something that, you know, some mechanism-

    13. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    14. KB

      ... that you can actually quantify. Um, that's the, that's the fun part of astrophysics. Just kind of simulating things in extreme detail is, well, cool, we'll make cool visualizations, but that doesn't get to, doesn't, doesn't get you to any better understanding than you had before you did the simulation.

    15. LF

      If you ask very specific questions, then you'll be able to, uh, create, like, very highly compressed, nice, beautiful theories about how things evolved, and then you can use those to then generalize to other solar systems, to, uh, other stars and other galaxies and say something generalizable about the entire universe.

  12. 51:2453:45

    How far should we go with the simulation?

    1. LF

      How difficult would it be to simulate our solar system such that we would not know the difference? Meaning, if we are living in a simulation, is there a nice... Think of it as a video game.

    2. KB

      Mm-hmm. Sure.

    3. LF

      Is there a nice compressible way of doing that? Or just kind of like you intuited with the three-body situation, is just a giant mess that you cannot create a video game that, uh, will seem realistic without actually building a universe from scratch?

    4. KB

      Well, so, uh, I'm, you know, I'm speculating, but one-

    5. LF

      (laughs)

    6. KB

      ... of the... Yeah, I know, I know you, like, you have a deep understanding of this, uh, but, like, m- for me, I, I'm, I'm just gonna, like, speculate that for, um, at least in the types of simulations that we can do today, inevitably you run into the problem of resolution, right? Your... It doesn't matter what you're doing, it is discrete. Now, um, the way you would go about asking, you know, if what we're observing, is that a simulation or, uh, or is that, you know, some real continuous thing-

    7. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    8. KB

      ... uh, is you, you zoom in, right? You zoom in and try and find the, you know, the grid scale, if you will.

    9. LF

      Yeah.

    10. KB

      Um, yeah. I mean, it's a, it's a really interesting, it's a really interesting question, and because the solar system itself, and really, you know, the double pendulum is chaotic, right? Pendulum sitting on another pendulum, it moves unpredictably once you let them go. Um, you really don't need to, like, inject any randomness into a simulation for it to, to give you stochastic and unpredictable answers. Weather is a great example of this. Weather has a lapin of time of, you know, typical weather systems have a lapin of time of a few days. And there's a fundamental reason why the force... forecast always sucks, you know, two weeks in advance. It's not that we don't know the equations that govern the atmosphere. We know them well. Their solutions are meaningless though after a few days.

    11. LF

      The zooming in thing is very interesting.

  13. 53:451:00:10

    Increasing immersion in video games

    1. LF

      I, I, uh, think about this a lot, whether there'll be a time soon where we would want to stay in video game worlds, whether it's virtual reality or just playing video games.

    2. KB

      I mean, I think that time, like, came in, like, the '90s, and it's been that time.

    3. LF

      Well, it's not just, it's not just came, it's, I mean, it's accelerated. I just recently saw that WoW and Fortnite were played 140 billion hours, and those are just video games.

    4. KB

      Yeah.

    5. LF

      And that's, like, increasing very, very quickly, especially with the people coming up now, and being born now and become, you know, becoming teenagers-

    6. KB

      Yeah.

    7. LF

      ... and so on. Let's have a thought experiment wh- ... it's just you and a video game character inside a room. Where you remove the simulation, the need to simulate sort of, um, a lot of objects. If it's just you and that character, how far do you need to simulate in terms of zooming in for it to be very real to you?

    8. KB

      Oh, uh, yeah.

    9. LF

      As real as reality. So, like, first of all-

    10. KB

      Mm-hmm.

    11. LF

      ... you kind of mentioned zooming in, which is fascinating, because we have these tools of science that allow us to zoom in, quote-unquote, in all kinds of ways.... a- a- and the world around us, but our cognitive abilities, like our perception system as humans is very limited in terms of zooming in.

    12. KB

      Oh, sure. Yeah.

    13. LF

      So we might be very easily fooled.

    14. KB

      Some of the video games, like, on the PS4-

    15. LF

      Yeah.

    16. KB

      ... like, look pretty real to me.

    17. LF

      Yeah.

    18. KB

      Right? Uh, I think, you know, you would really have to interrogate... uh, I mean, I think even with what we have today, like, uh, I don't know, Ace Combat 7 is a great example, right?

    19. LF

      Yeah.

    20. KB

      Like, I mean, the way that the clouds are rendered, uh, it's... I mean, looks just like when you're flying, you know, on a real airplane-

    21. LF

      Yeah.

    22. KB

      ... the, the kind of transparency. I think that the, you know, our perception is limited enough already-

    23. LF

      Yeah.

    24. KB

      ... to not be able to tell some of the, uh, you know, some of the differences.

    25. LF

      There's a game called, uh, Skyrim, it's an Elder Scrolls role-playing game. And I just, uh, I played it for quite a bit.

    26. KB

      Mm-hmm.

    27. LF

      And I (laughs) think I played it very different than others. Like, there'll be s- long stretches of time where I would just walk around and look at nature in the game.

    28. KB

      Mm-hmm.

    29. LF

      It's incredible.

    30. KB

      Oh, sure.

  14. 1:00:101:06:39

    What is Planet Nine?

    1. KB

    2. LF

      So, let me return us back to Planet Nine.

    3. KB

      Uh-huh. Always a good place to come back to.

    4. LF

      So now that we did a big historical overview of our solar system, what is Planet Nine?

    5. KB

      Okay. Planet Nine is a hypothetical object that orbits the solar system, right? Uh, on orbital period of about 10,000 years and, um, an orbit which is, uh, slightly tilted with respect to the plane of the solar system, slightly eccentric, and the object itself we think is five times more massive than the Earth. We have never seen Planet Nine in a telescope, but we have gravitational evidence for it.

    6. LF

      And so this is where all the stuff we've been talking about, this clustering ideas, maybe you can speak to the approximate location that we suspect. And also the question I wanted to ask is, uh, what are we supposed to be imagining here? 'Cause you said there's certain objects in the Kuiper Belt that are... kind of have a direction to them, that they're all like-... like flocking in some kind of way. Mm-hmm. So that's the sense that there is some kind of gravitational object not changing their orbit, but kind of ...

    7. KB

      Confining them, right?

    8. LF

      Yeah.

    9. KB

      Confining, like grouping their orbits together. See, what would happen if Planet Nine were not there, is these orbits that roughly share a common orientation, they would just disperse, right? They would just become asym- asymmetry symmetric point everywhere. Planet Nine's gravity makes it such that these objects stay in a state that's- that's basically anti-aligned, with respect to the orbit of Planet Nine. Um, and- and sort of hang out there and kind of oscillate on time scale of about a billion years. That's one of the lines of evidence for the existence of Planet Nine. There are others. That's the one that's easiest to maybe visualize just because it's fun to think about orbits that all point into the same direction. But I should, um, you know, emphasize that, for example, the existence of objects, again, Kuiper Belt objects, that are heavily out of the plane of the solar system, things that are tilted by, say, 90 degrees, that's not... Uh, we don't expect that as an outcome of planet formation. Indeed planet formation simulations have never produced such objects without some extrinsic gravitational force.

    10. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    11. KB

      Planet Nine on the other hand, generates them very readily. So that p- uh, provides kind of an alternative, you know, population of small bodies in the solar system that also get produced by Planet Nine through an independent kind of gravitational effect. So there are kind of... There's basically five different things that the, uh, that Planet Nine does individually that are like kind of maybe a one sigma effect where you'd say, "Yeah, okay. If that's all it was, maybe it's not... No reason to jump up and down." But because it's- it's mul- it's a multitude of these puzzles that all are explained by one hypothesis, that's- that's really the- the magnetism, the attraction of the Planet Nine model.

    12. LF

      So, can you just clarify?

    13. KB

      Mm-hmm.

    14. LF

      (laughs) So most orbit, most planets in the solar system orbit at approximately the same, so it's flat?

    15. KB

      That's right. Yeah, it's like one degree. They, the difference between them is o- about one degree.

    16. LF

      So, but, nevertheless, if we looked at our solar system, it would look... And I could see every single object, it would look like a sphere?

    17. KB

      The inner part where the planets are would look like-

    18. LF

      Flat.

    19. KB

      ... you know, flat, right? The- the Kuiper Belt and the asteroid belt have a larger, um...

    20. LF

      It gets fatter and fatter and fatter-

    21. KB

      Yeah, it's kind of like this.

    22. LF

      ... until it becomes a sphere.

    23. KB

      That's right. And if you look at the very outside, it's polluted by this, you know, quasi-spheroidal thing. Nobody's, of course, ever seen the Oort cloud, right? We've only seen comets that come from the Oort cloud. So the Oort cloud, which is this, right, population of distant debris, its existence is also inferred. You could say alternatively there is, you know, there's a big cosmic creature that occasionally... You know, it's sitting at 20,000 AU and occasionally throws an icy rock-

    24. LF

      (laughs)

    25. KB

      ... towards the s- sun like that-

    26. LF

      Spaghetti monster, I think-

    27. KB

      Right.

    28. LF

      ... it's called.

    29. KB

      Yeah.

    30. LF

      Okay. You know, I mean (laughs) . S- so it's a mystery in many ways but you can kind of infer a bunch of things about it. It's- it's, by the way, both terrifying and exciting that there's this vast darkness all around us that's full of objects that are just throwing ...

  15. 1:06:391:09:03

    The origin of life

    1. LF

      Do you think it's possible that life from other solar systems was injected and that that was what was, uh, the origin of life on Earth?

    2. KB

      Yeah, the panspermia idea. Um ...

    3. LF

      That- that's seen as a low probability event by people who study the origin of life but that's because, uh, then they would be out of a job (laughs) .

    4. KB

      (laughs) . Well, I don't think they'd be out of a job 'cause you just didn't say, you have to figure out how life started on there.

    5. LF

      But then you have to go there. We can study life on Earth much easier, we could study it in a lab much easier because we could replicate conditions there, uh, from an early L- um, Earth much easier from a chemistry perspective, from a biology perspective. You can intuit a bunch of stuff, you can look at different parts of Earth and just ...

    6. KB

      To an extent. I mean, the early Earth was completely unlike the current Earth, right?

    7. LF

      Yeah.

    8. KB

      There was no oxygen. So, uh, one of my colleagues at Caltech, uh, Joe Kirschnik, uh, is-... um, certain, right. W- something like 100% certainty-

    9. LF

      (laughs)

    10. KB

      ... that life started on Mars and came to Earth, uh, in, on Martian meteorites. Um.

    11. LF

      (laughs)

    12. KB

      This is not a problem that I like to, kind of, think about too much, like the origin of life. It's a fascinating problem, but, you know, it's not physics, and I just, like, I just don't, don't love it.

    13. LF

      It's the same reason you don't love... I, I thought you were a musician.

    14. KB

      Yeah.

    15. LF

      So music, music is not physics either, so why, why are you so into-

    16. KB

      It's 100% physics. (laughs)

    17. LF

      (laughs)

    18. KB

      Yeah.

    19. LF

      Okay.

    20. KB

      No, no, no, look-

    21. LF

      (laughs)

    22. KB

      Uh, in all seriousness though, I, uh, there are a few things that I really, really enjoy. I genuinely enjoy physics, I genuinely enjoy music, I genuinely, you know, enjoy martial arts, and I genuinely enjoy, uh, my family. I should have said that all in a reverse order or something. But I like to focus on these things and, and not worry too much about, about everything else. You know what I mean?

    23. LF

      Yes.

    24. KB

      Just because there is a, like you said earlier, there's a time constraint. You can't do it all.

    25. LF

      There's many mysteries all around us. So, um, and they're all beautiful in, in different ways. To me, that thing I love is artificial intelligence.

    26. KB

      Mm-hmm.

    27. LF

      That, uh, perhaps I love it because eventually I'm trying to suck up to our future overlords. The, um,

  16. 1:09:031:11:33

    Evidence of Planet Nine

    1. LF

      the question of... You said there's a lot of, kind of, little pieces of evidence for this thing that's Planet Nine. If we were to try to collect more evidence, or be certain, like a paper that says, like, you drop it, clear, we're done. What, what does that require? Does that require-

    2. KB

      Mm-hmm.

    3. LF

      ... us sending probes out, or do you think we can do it from telescopes here on Earth? What, what are the different ideas for conclusive evidence for Planet Nine?

    4. KB

      The moment Planet Nine gets imaged from a telescope on Earth, it's done. I mean, it's just there.

    5. LF

      Can you clarify, because you, you mentioned that before, from an image, would you be able to tell?

    6. KB

      Yes. So from an image, the moment you see something, something that is reflecting sunlight back at you, and you know that it's hundreds of times as far away from-

    7. LF

      Ah.

    8. KB

      ... the sun as is, as is the earth, you're done.

    9. LF

      So you're, you're thinking, so basically, if you have a really far away thing that's big-

    10. KB

      Yeah.

    11. LF

      ... you know, five times the size of Earth, that means, uh, that-

    12. KB

      That is-

    13. LF

      ... that's Planet Nine.

    14. KB

      That is Planet Nine.

    15. LF

      Could there be multiple objects like that? I guess-

    16. KB

      In principle, yeah. I mean, there's no, there's no law of physics that, uh, that doesn't allow you to have multiple objects. There's also no evidence at present for there being multiple objects.

    17. LF

      I wonder if there... it's possible, so it's like, just like we're finding exoplanets-

    18. KB

      Mm-hmm.

    19. LF

      ... whether given the size of the Oort cloud, there's basically, it's rarer and rarer, but they're sprinkled Planet Nine, 10, 11, 12, like these-

    20. KB

      Yeah.

    21. LF

      ... some-

    22. KB

      You got 13.

    23. LF

      Yeah, it goes after that.

    24. KB

      (laughs) Yeah. So... (laughs)

    25. LF

      I can just keep counting. So, like, just something about the dynamic-

    26. KB

      Yeah.

    27. LF

      ... system, like, it becomes lower and lower probability event, but they gather up, like, they, they become, would they become larger and larger maybe, something like that. And I wonder, I wonder if, like, discovering Planet Nine will, will just, like, be almost like a springboard, it's like, well, what's, what's beyond that?

    28. KB

      It's entirely plausible. The Oort cloud itself probably holds about five Earth masses or seven Earth masses of material, um, right? So it's not, it's not nothing. And the... it all ultimately comes down to at what point will the observational surveys sample enough of the solar system to, uh, kind of reveal interesting things.

    29. LF

      Mm-hmm.

  17. 1:11:331:12:43

    Discovery of Neptune

    1. LF

    2. KB

      There's a great analogy here with Neptune and the story of how Neptune was discovered. Neptune was not discovered by looking at the sky, right? It was discovered by, uh, it was discovered mathematically, right? So-

    3. LF

      Oh.

    4. KB

      Uh, yeah, the orbit of Uranus, when Uranus was found, um, this, this was 1781. Uh, it's the kind of tracking of... both the tracking of the orbit of Uranus as well as the reconstruction of the orbit of Uranus immediately revealed that it was not following the orbit that it was supposed to, right? The, the predicted orbit deviated away from where it actually was. So, uh, in the mid-1800s, right, um, a French mathematician by the name of Urbain Le Verrier did a beautifully sophisticated calculation which said, if this is due to gravity of a more distant planet, then that planet is there.

    5. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    6. KB

      Okay? And then they found it. But the point is, the understanding of where to look for Neptune came entirely out of celestial mechanics.

  18. 1:12:431:15:22

    When will we find Planet Nine?

    1. KB

      The case with Planet Nine is a little bit different, because what we can do, I think relatively well, is predict the orbit and mass of Planet Nine. We cannot tell you where it is on its orbit. The reason is we haven't seen the Kuiper Belt objects complete an orbit, their own orbit-

    2. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    3. KB

      ... even once, because it takes 4,000 years. But, you know, I plan to live on as an AI being, uh, and, you know, I'll, I'll be tracking those, uh, those orbits as, you know-

    4. LF

      So all it takes-

    5. KB

      ... for-

    6. LF

      ... 4,000 or 5,000 years, I mean, it could, it doesn't have to be AI, it could be longevity. There's a lot of really exciting genetic engineering research. So you'll, you'll just be a brain waiting for the (laughs) for the, your brain waiting for the orbit to complete for the basic Kuiper Belt objects.

    7. KB

      That's, that's right. That's like kind of the worst reason to want to live a long time, right? (laughs)

    8. LF

      (laughs)

    9. KB

      Just like, can the brain, like, smoke a cigarette?

    10. LF

      I know, right?

    11. KB

      Right. Can you just-

    12. LF

      It's like-

    13. KB

      ... light one up while you're waiting or...

    14. LF

      (laughs) Uh...But you make me actually realize that the one way to explore the, the galaxy is by just sitting here on Earth and waiting. (laughs) So, if we can just get really good at waiting, it's like ʻOumuamua or these interstellar objects that fly in, you can just wait for them to come to you. Same with the aliens, you can wait for them to come to you. If you get really good at waiting, um, then that's one way to do the exploration because eventually the thing will come to you. Maybe that's the enti- maybe the il- intelligent alien civilizations get much better at waiting, and so they all decide, so game theoretically, to start waiting, and it's just a bunch of, like, ancient intelligent civilizations of aliens all throughout the universe that are just sitting there waiting for each other.

    15. KB

      Look, you can't just be good at waiting. You gotta know how to chill, okay?

    16. LF

      (laughs)

    17. KB

      Like, like, you can't just, like, sit around and do nothing. You gotta be- you gotta, you gotta know how to chill.

    18. LF

      I honestly think that as we progress-

    19. KB

      Mm-hmm.

    20. LF

      ... if the aliens are anything like us, we enjoy loving things we do. And it, it's, uh, it's very possible that we just figure out mechanisms here on Earth to enjoy our life-

    21. KB

      Yeah.

    22. LF

      ... and we just stay here on Earth fore- e- uh, forever, that exploration becomes less and less of an interesting thing to do. And so you basically, yes, wait and chill. (laughs)

    23. KB

      Yeah.

    24. LF

      You get really optimally good at chilling, and thereby exploring, uh, uh, is not that, uh, interesting.

    25. KB

      Yeah.

    26. LF

      So, you know, in, in terms of 4,000 years, it would be nothing for scientists. We'll be chilling and just all kinds of scientific explorations will become possible because we'll just be here on Earth.

    27. KB

      So chill.

    28. LF

      (laughs) So

  19. 1:15:221:19:17

    Planet Nine throws rocks into the Kuiper Belt

    1. LF

      chill.

    2. KB

      So chill.

    3. LF

      You have a paper out recently, 'cause y- you already mentioned some of these ideas, but I'd love it if you could dig into it a little bit.

    4. KB

      Yeah, of course.

    5. LF

      The injection of inner Oort cloud objects into the distant Kuiper belt by Planet Nine. What is this idea of, uh, Planet Nine injecting objects into the Kuiper belt?

    6. KB

      Okay, let me take a, a brief step back and say when we do calculations of Planet Nine, when we do the simulations, as far as our simulations are concerned, sort of the, uh, Neptune, like, kind of the, the Nept- trans-Neptunian solar system is entirely sourced from the inside. Namely, the Kuiper belt gets scattered by Neptune, and then Planet Nine does things to it and aligns the orbits and, and so on. And w- and then we calculate what, uh, what happens on the lifetime of the solar system, yada, yada, ya. Um, during the pandemic, one of the, kind of, questions we asked o- ourselves, and this is indeed something we, Mike and I, um, Mike Brown who's a partner in crime on this, and I do regularly, is we say, "How can we, A, disprove ourselves, and B, how can we improve our simulations? Like, what's missing?"

    7. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    8. KB

      And one idea we, that maybe should have been obvious in retrospect is that all of our simulations treated the solar system as some isolated creature, right? But the solar system did not form in isolation, right? It formed in this cluster of stars. And during that phase of forming together with thousands of other stars, we believe the solar system formed this almost spherical population of icy debris that sits maybe at a few thousand times the (clears throat) separation between the Earth and the sun, maybe even a little bit closer. If Planet Nine is not there, that population is completely dormant, right? These objects just slowly orbit the, the sun, nothing interesting ha- happens to them ever. But what we realize is that if Planet Nine is there, Planet Nine can actually grab some of those objects and gravitationally re-inject them-

    9. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    10. KB

      ... into the distant solar system. So, we thought, "Okay, let's look into this with numerical experiments, do, do our simulations. Does this process work? And if it works, uh, what are its consequences?" So, it turns out, indeed, not only does Planet Nine inject these distant k- um, inner Oort cloud objects into the Kuiper belt, they follow roughly the same pathway as the, um, as the objects that are being scattered out. Also, there's this kind of river, two-way river of material. Some of it is coming out from, you know, by Neptune scattering, some of it is moving in. And if you work through the numbers, you kind of, at the end of the day, that it, it ch- has an effect on the best fit orbit for Planet Nine itself. So, if you realize that the data set that we're observing is not entirely composed of things that came out of the solar system, but also things that got re-injected back in, then turns out the best fit Planet Nine slightly more eccentric, that's kind of getting into the weeds. The, the point here is that, uh, you know, the existence of Planet Nine itself provides this natural bridge that connects an otherwise dormant population of icy debris of the solar system with things that we're starting to directly observe.

    11. LF

      So, it can flow back, so it's not just a river-

    12. KB

      Yeah.

    13. LF

      ... flowing one way, it's maybe a smaller stream going back, and-

    14. KB

      Backwash.

    15. LF

      You want a backwash.

    16. KB

      (laughs)

    17. LF

      You want to incorporate that into the simulations, into your understanding of those distant objects when you're trying to make sense-

    18. KB

      Mm-hmm.

    19. LF

      ... of the various observations and so on.

    20. KB

      Exactly.

    21. LF

      That's fascinating.

  20. 1:19:171:29:21

    Could Planet Nine be a primordial black hole?

    1. LF

      I gotta ask you, some people think-

    2. KB

      Mm-hmm.

    3. LF

      ... that, uh, many of the observations that you're describing could be described by a primordial black hole. First, what is a primordial black hole, and what do you think about this idea?

    4. KB

      Yeah. So, a primordial black hole is a black hole which is made not through the usual pathway of making a black hole, um, which is that you have a star which is, uh, more massive than, you know, 1.4 or so solar masses, and basically when it runs out of fuel-... uh, runs out of its nuclear fusion fuel. It can't hold itself up anymore and just the whole thing collapses on itself. (imitates explosion) Right?

    5. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    6. KB

      You create a, um... I mean, one, I guess, simple way to think about it is you create an object with zero radius, uh, that has mass but zero radius, uh, singularity.

    7. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    8. KB

      Um, now, that's... Such black holes exist all over the place. In the galaxy there's in fact a really big one at the center of the galaxy that's like-

    9. LF

      Yeah, that one terrifies me.

    10. KB

      Yeah. That w- that one's always looking at you when you're not looking, okay?

    11. LF

      (laughs)

    12. KB

      Right? And it's- it's always talking about you.

    13. LF

      And when you turn off the lights it s- it wakes up.

    14. KB

      That's right.

    15. LF

      (laughs)

    16. KB

      Um, but, you know, so such black holes are all over the place. We... When they merge we get to see, you know, incredible gravitational waves that they emit, et cetera, et cetera. One kind of plausible scenario however, is that when the universe was forming, basically during the Big Bang, you created a whole spectrum of black holes, uh, some with masses of five Earth masses, some with masses of 10 Earth masses, like the entire, you know, mass spectrum size, the ma- some the mass of asteroids. Now, on the smaller end over the lifetime of the universe, the small ones kind of evaporate, uh, and they're not there anymore. At least this is what we, uh, what the calculations tell us. Um, but five Earth masses is big enough to not have evaporated. So one idea is that Planet Nine is not a planet and instead it is a five Earth mass black hole, and that's why it's hard to find. Now, um, can we right away from our calculations say that's definitely true or that's not true? Absolutely not. We can't... In fact, our calculations tell you nothing other than the orbit and the mass.

    17. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    18. KB

      And that means the black hole, I mean, it could be a five Earth mass, you know, cup.

    19. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    20. KB

      It could be a five Earth mass hedgehog or a black hole, or- or really anything that's five Earth masses will do because the gravity of a black hole is no different than the gravity of a planet, right? If the sun became a black hole tomorrow it would be dark but Earth- the Earth would keep orbiting it. And, uh, like this notion that all black holes suck everything in, it- it's- it's not.

    21. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    22. KB

      That's like a sci-fi notion.

    23. LF

      Right, it's just mass. What would be the difference between a black hole and a planet in terms of observationally?

    24. KB

      Uh, observationally the difference would be that you will never find a black hole, right?

    25. LF

      (laughs)

    26. KB

      The truth is they're kind of, um... I'm actually not, you know, uh... I never looked into this very carefully but there- there are some constraints that you can get to statistically say, okay, if the sun has a binary companion which is a five Earth mass black hole, then that means bla- such black holes would be extremely common and, you know-

    27. LF

      Yeah.

    28. KB

      ... you could s- sort of look for lensing events and then you say, "Okay, maybe that's not so likely." But, you know, that said, I wanna emphasize that there's a limit to what our calculations, uh, can tell you. That's the orbit and the mass.

    29. LF

      So I think there's a bunch... Like, Ed Witten, I think-

    30. KB

      Mm-hmm.

  21. 1:29:211:36:48

    Commercial space revolution boosts science and the human condition

    1. KB

Episode duration: 2:39:53

Install uListen for AI-powered chat & search across the full episode — Get Full Transcript

Transcript of episode tm7poMupE8k

Get more out of YouTube videos.

High quality summaries for YouTube videos. Accurate transcripts to search & find moments. Powered by ChatGPT & Claude AI.

Add to Chrome