Skip to content
Ray Dalio: Principles, the Economic Machine, AI & the Arc of Life | Lex Fridman Podcast #54
This video isn’t embeddableWatch on YouTube →
Lex Fridman PodcastLex Fridman Podcast

Ray Dalio: Principles, the Economic Machine, AI & the Arc of Life | Lex Fridman Podcast #54

Ray Dalio is the founder, Co-Chairman and Co-Chief Investment Officer of Bridgewater Associates, one of the world's largest and most successful investment firms that is famous for the principles of radical truth and transparency that underlie its culture. Ray is one of the wealthiest people in the world, with ideas that extend far beyond the specifics of how he made that wealth. His ideas, applicable to everyone, are brilliantly summarized in his book Principles. Thank you for listening ❤ Check out our sponsors: https://lexfridman.com/sponsors/ep54-sb See below for timestamps, and to give feedback, submit questions, contact Lex, etc. *CONTACT LEX:* *Feedback* - give feedback to Lex: https://lexfridman.com/survey *AMA* - submit questions, videos or call-in: https://lexfridman.com/ama *Hiring* - join our team: https://lexfridman.com/hiring *Other* - other ways to get in touch: https://lexfridman.com/contact *OUTLINE:* 0:00 - Introduction 2:56 - Doing something that's never been done before 8:39 - Shapers 13:28 - A Players 15:09 - Confidence and disagreement 17:10 - Don't confuse dilusion with not knowing 24:38 - Idea meritocracy 27:39 - Is credit good for society? 32:59 - What is money? 37:13 - Bitcoin and digital currency 41:01 - The economic machine is amazing 46:24 - Principle for using AI 58:55 - Human irrationality 1:01:31 - Call for adventure at the edge of principles 1:03:26 - The line between madness and genius 1:04:30 - Automation 1:07:28 - American dream 1:14:02 - Can money buy happiness? 1:19:48 - Work-life balance and the arc of life 1:28:01 - Meaning of life *PODCAST LINKS:* - Podcast Website: https://lexfridman.com/podcast - Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lwqZIr - Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2nEwCF8 - RSS: https://lexfridman.com/feed/podcast/ - Podcast Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLrAXtmErZgOdP_8GztsuKi9nrraNbKKp4 - Clips Channel: https://www.youtube.com/lexclips *SOCIAL LINKS:* - X: https://x.com/lexfridman - Instagram: https://instagram.com/lexfridman - TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@lexfridman - LinkedIn: https://linkedin.com/in/lexfridman - Facebook: https://facebook.com/lexfridman - Patreon: https://patreon.com/lexfridman - Telegram: https://t.me/lexfridman - Reddit: https://reddit.com/r/lexfridman

Lex FridmanhostRay Dalioguest
Dec 2, 20191h 30mWatch on YouTube ↗

EVERY SPOKEN WORD

  1. 0:00 – 2:56

    Introduction

    1. LF

      The following is a conversation with Ray Dalio. He's the founder, co-chairman, and co-chief investment officer of Bridgewater Associates, one of the world's largest and most successful investment firms that is famous for the principles of radical truth and transparency that underlie its culture. Ray is one of the wealthiest people in the world, with ideas that extend far beyond the specifics of how he made that wealth. His ideas that are applicable to everyone are brilliantly summarized in his book, Principles. They are also even further condensed on several other platforms, including YouTube, where, for example, a 30-minute video titled How the Economic Machine Works is one of the best educational videos I personally have ever seen on YouTube. Once again, you may have noticed that the people I've been speaking with are not just computer scientists, but philosophers, mathematicians, writers, psychologists, physicists, economists, investors, and soon, much more. To me, AI is much bigger than deep learning, bigger than computing. It is our civilization's journey into understanding the human mind and creating echoes of it in a machine. That journey includes the mechanisms of our economy, of our politics, and the leaders that shape the future of both. This is the Artificial Intelligence podcast. If you enjoy it, subscribe on YouTube, give it five stars on Apple Podcasts, support it on Patreon, or simply connect with me on Twitter @lexfridman, spelled F-R-I-D-M-A-N. This show is presented by Cash App, the number one finance app in the App Store. I personally use Cash App to send money to friends, but you can also use it to buy, sell, and deposit Bitcoin. Most Bitcoin exchanges take days for a bank transfer to become investable. Through Cash App, it takes seconds. Cash App also has a new investing feature. You can buy fractions of a stock, which to me is a really interesting concept. So you can buy of one dollar's worth, no matter what the stock price is. Brokerage services are provided by Cash App Investing, a subsidiary of Square and member SIPC. I'm excited to be working with Cash App to support one of my favorite organizations that many of you may know and have benefited from called FIRST, best known for their FIRST Robotics and Lego competitions. They educate and inspire hundreds of thousands of students in over 110 countries and have a perfect rating on Charity Navigator, which means the donated money is used to maximum effectiveness. When you get Cash App from the App Store or Google Play and use code LEXPODCAST, you'll get ten dollars, and Cash App will also donate ten dollars to FIRST, which again is an organization that I've personally seen inspire girls and boys to dream of engineering a better world. And now, here's my conversation with Ray Dalio.

  2. 2:56 – 8:39

    Doing something that's never been done before

    1. LF

      Truth, or more precisely, an accurate understanding of reality, is the essential foundation of any good outcome. I believe you've said that. Let me ask an absurd-sounding question at the high philosophical level. So what is truth? When you're trying to do something different than everybody else is doing, and perhaps something that has not been done before, how do you accurately analyze the situation? How do you accurately discover the truth, the nature of things?

    2. RD

      Almost the way you're asking the question implies that, um, truth and newness have nothing... are almost at odds.

    3. LF

      Oh.

    4. RD

      And I just want to say that I don't think that that's true, right? So what I mean by truth- eh, truth is, uh, you know, what is the reality? How does the reality work? And so if you're doing something new that has never been done before, which is exciting and I like to do, the way that you would start with that is experimenting on what are the realities and the premises that you're using on that and how to stress test those types of things. I think what you're talking about is instead the fact of how do you deal with something that's never been done before-

    5. LF

      Yeah.

    6. RD

      ... and deal with the associated probabilities? And so I, I think in that, don't let something that's never been done before stand in the way of you doing that particular thing. You have a- Because almost the only way that you understand what truth is, is through experimentation. And so when you go out and experiment, you're going to learn a lot more about what truth is. But the essence of what I'm saying is that when you take a look at that, use truth to find out what the realities are as a foundation, do the independent thinking, do the experimentation to find out what's true, and change and keep going after that. So I think that the we- that when you're thinking about it the way you're thinking about it, that almost implies that you're, you're letting people almost say that they're reliant on what's been discovered before to find out what's true, and what's been discovered before is often not true, right?

    7. LF

      Right. Exactly.

    8. RD

      Conventional view of what tr- what is true is very often wrong. It'll go in ups and downs, and, you know, I mean, there are fads and okay, this thing, it goes this way and that way. And so definitions of truths that are conventional are not the thing to go by.

    9. LF

      How do you know the thing that has been done before, that it might succeed?

    10. RD

      It's to do whatever homework that you have in order to try to get a foundation, and then to go into worlds of not knowing-And you go into the world of not knowing, but not stupidly, not naively, you know? You go into that world of not knowing, and then you do experimenting, and you learn what truth is and what's possible through that process. I describe it as a five-step process.

    11. LF

      Yes.

    12. RD

      The first step is you go after your goals, the second step is you identify the problems that stand in the way of you getting to your goals, the third step is you diagnose those to get at the root cause of those, then the fourth step is then, now that you know the exact root cause, you get, you design a way to get around those, and then you, um, follow through and do the designs you set out to do, and it's the experimentation. I think that what happens to people mostly is that they try to decide whether they're gonna be successful or not ahead of doing it.

    13. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    14. RD

      And they don't know how to do the process well, because the nature of your questions are along those lines, like, "How do you know?"

    15. LF

      Yeah.

    16. RD

      Well, you don't know. But a practical person who is also used to making dreams happen knows how to do that process. I've given personality tests to shapers. So the person, what I mean by a shaper is a person who can take something from visualiz- visualization, they have an audacious goal-

    17. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    18. RD

      ... and then they go from visualization to actualization, building it out. That includes, uh, E- uh, Elon Musk. I gave him the personality test.

    19. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    20. RD

      I've given it to Bill Gates, and I've given it to many, many, uh, such shapers. And they know that process that I'm talking about. They experience it, which is a process, essentially, of knowing how to go from an audacious goal, but not in a r- ridiculous way, not a, a dream, and then to do that learning along the way that allows them, in a very practical way, to learn very rapidly as they're moving toward that goal.

    21. LF

      So the, the call to adventure, the adventure starts, uh, not trying to analyze the probabilities of the situation, but, uh, using what instinct? How do you dive in? So let's-

    22. RD

      It is-

    23. LF

      ... let's talk about it.

    24. RD

      ... it, it is, it, it is being a ... it's simultaneously being a dreamer and a realist. It's to know how to do that well. The pull comes from a pull to adventure. For whatever reason, uh, I can't tell you how much of it's genetics and how much it's environment, but there's a early on, it's exciting.

    25. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    26. RD

      That notion is exciting.

    27. LF

      Yes.

    28. RD

      Being creative is exciting. And so one feels that. Then one gets in the habit of, of doing that. Okay, how do I know? How do I learn very well? And then, how do I imagine? And then, how do I experiment to go from that imagination? So it's that process that one, uh, one l- and when l- and then one, the more one does it, the one, more, the better one becomes at it.

    29. LF

      Mm-hmm.

  3. 8:39 – 13:28

    Shapers

    1. LF

      You mentioned shapers. Elon Musk, Bill Gates. What ... Who are the shapers that you find yourself thinking about when you're constructing these ideas? The ones that define the archetype of a shaper for you?

    2. RD

      Well, as I say, a shaper, for me, is somebody who comes up with a great visualization, um, usually a really unique visualization, and then, uh, actually builds it out and makes the world different, changes the world in that kind of a way. So when I look at it, Marc Benioff with Salesforce, Chris Anderson with TED, Muhammad Yunus with social enterprise and philanthropy, Geoffrey Canada and Harlem Children's Zone, there are ... Uh, all domains have shapers who have the av- ability to visualize and make extraordinary things happen.

    3. LF

      What are the commonalities between some of them?

    4. RD

      The commonalities are, first of all, the excitement of something new, that call to adventure, and in again, that practicality, the capacity to learn. It ... And the capacity then, um, they're, they're able to g- be, in many ways, full range. That means they're able to go from the big, big picture down to the detail.

    5. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    6. RD

      So let's say, for example, uh, Elon Musk. He, he describes, he gets, uh, a lot of money from selling PayPal, his interest in PayPal. He said, "Why isn't anybody going to Mars or w- out into space? What are we gonna do if the planet goes to hell?"

    7. LF

      Right.

    8. RD

      "And how do I, how do we gonna get there? And nobody's paying attention to that." He doesn't know much about it. He, he then reads and learns and so on. Says, "I'm gonna take, um, okay, half of my money, and I'm gonna put it in there, and I'm gonna do this thing." And he learns, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, and he's got creative. Okay. That's one dimension. And so, he, he, and gave me the, uh, uh, um, keys to his car. This was just early days in T- in Tesla.

    9. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    10. RD

      And he then points out the details. "Okay, if you push this button here, it's this," the detail that ... So he's simultaneously talking about the big, th- the big, big, big picture. "Okay, when does humanity, um, going to ab- abandon the planet?" But he will then be able to take it down into the detail so he can go, oh, let's call it helicoptering. He can go up, he can go down, and see things at those types of perspective. Quite a-

    11. LF

      And then you've seen that with the other shapers as well?

    12. RD

      ... and that's a common thing, that they can do that. Another important difference that they have in mind is how they deal with people. I mean, meaning, there's nothing more important than achieving the mission. And so-What they have in common is that there's a test that I- I give these personality tests, um, 'cause they're very helpful for understanding people. And so, I gave it to all these, uh, shapers. And one of the things in Workplace Inventory Test is this test and it has a category called Concern For Others. What it r- it- so- they were all having concern for others. This includes Muhammad Yunus who invented microfinance, social enterprise. Impact investing as Muhammad Yunus received the Nobel Peace Prize for this, C- Congressional Medal of Honor. Uh, one of the, um, uh, Fortune determined one of the 10, uh, greatest, um, entrepreneurs of our time.

    13. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    14. RD

      He's built all sorts of businesses to give back money in social enterprise. A remarkable man. He has... Nobody that I know, practically, could have more concern for others. Um, he lives a life of a saint. I mean, a very modest lifestyle and he's g- puts all of his money in to try to help others. And he tests low on what's called Concern For Others because what it really... Those- the questions under that are questions about conflict to get at the mission. So they all, Geoffrey Canada who changed Harlem Children's Zone and devel- developed that to take children in Harlem and get them well taken care of, not only just in their education, but their whole lives. Harlem, him also, concern for others. What they mean is that they can, um, see whether tho- individuals are- are performing at a level that a- an extremely high level that's necessary to make those dreams happen. So, when you think of, let's say, Steve Jobs was famous for being, you know, difficult with people and so on, and I didn't know Steve Jobs so I can't speak personally to that, but his comments on if you have A players, and if you have A players...

    15. LF

      Yeah.

    16. RD

      ... if you put in B players, pretty soon you'll have C players and so on.

    17. LF

      Yeah.

    18. RD

      That is a common element of them. Holding people to high standards and not letting anybody stand in the way of the- the mission.

  4. 13:28 – 15:09

    A Players

    1. RD

    2. LF

      What do you think about that k- kind of idea? Sorry to pause on that for a second. That the A, B, and- and C players, and, uh, the importance of so when you have a mission to really only have A players and be sort of aggressively filtering for that.

    3. RD

      Yes, but I think that there are all different ways of being A players.

    4. LF

      Oh, okay.

    5. RD

      And I think in order to create a great team, you have to appreciate all the differences in ways of being A players, okay?

    6. LF

      Uh-huh, yes.

    7. RD

      That's the first thing. And then you always have to be super excellent, in my opinion, you always have to be really excellent pe- with people to help them understand each oth- themselves, and- and get in sync with them about what's true about them and their circumstances, how they're doing, so that they're having a fabulous personal development experience at the same time as you're dealing with them. So, when I say, um, that there are all different ways, this is one of the then qualities. You- you asked me what are the qualities?

    8. LF

      Yes.

    9. RD

      So one of the third qualities...

    10. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    11. RD

      ... that I would say is to know how to deal well with your not knowing, and to be able to get the best, uh, expertise so that you're a great orchestrator of different ways, so that the people who are really, really successful, unlike most people believe that they're successful because of what they know, they're, uh, even more successful by being able to effectively learn from others and tapping into the skills of people who see things different from them.

  5. 15:09 – 17:10

    Confidence and disagreement

    1. LF

      Brilliant. So how do you, when that- that personality being, first of all, open to the fact that there's other people see things differently than you, and at the same time have supreme confidence in your vision. Is there, um, just the psychology of that? Do you see a tension there between the confidence and the open-mindedness?

    2. RD

      No, it's funny because I think we grow up thinking that there's a tension there, right?

    3. LF

      Right.

    4. RD

      That there's a confidence, um, and the more confidence that, uh, you have, there's a tension with the open-mindedness and not being sure, okay?

    5. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    6. RD

      Um, confident and accurate are almost negatively cor- correlated in many people.

    7. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    8. RD

      They're extremely confident...

    9. LF

      Yeah.

    10. RD

      ... and they're often inaccurate. And so I think one of the greatest tragedies of people is not realizing how those things to- go together, because instead it's really that by saying, um, "I know a lot, and how do I know I'm still not wrong? And how do I take that, uh, the best thinking avo- a- available to me, and then raise my probability of learning?" All these people think for themselves, okay? Uh, mean- meaning they're smart.

    11. LF

      Yeah.

    12. RD

      But they take in, like vacuum cleaners, they take in ideas of others, they stress test their ideas with others, they assess what comes back to them in the form of other, uh, uh, thinking, and they also know what they're not good at, and what other people who are good at the things that they're not good at, they know how to get those people and be successful all around, because nobody has enough knowledge in their heads. And that, I think, is one of the great differences. So the reason my company has been successful br- uh, in terms of this, is 'cause of an idea meritocratic decision-making process by which you can get the best ideas. Uh, you know, what's an idea meritocracy? An idea meritocracy is to get the best ideas that are available out there and to work together with other people in the team to

  6. 17:10 – 24:38

    Don't confuse dilusion with not knowing

    1. RD

      achieve that.

    2. LF

      That's an incredible process thing you described in several places to arrive at the- the truth. But, uh, apologize if I'm romanticizing the notion, but let me linger on it. Uh, just having enough self-belief, you don't think there's a self-delusion there that's necessary? Especially in the beginning, you talk about in the journey maybe the trials or the abyss. Do you think...... there is value to d-deluding yourself.

    3. RD

      I think what you're calling delusion is a bad word-

    4. LF

      Yes.

    5. RD

      ... for uncertainty, okay? So, I mean, in other words, 'cause we keep going back to the question, how would you know and all of those things.

    6. LF

      Yeah.

    7. RD

      No. I think that delusion is not going to help you, that you have to find out truth, okay? To deal with uncertainty, n- saying, "Listen, I have this dream and I don't know how I'm going to get that dream." I mentioned in my book Principles, and described the process in a more complete way than we're going to be able to go here, but what happens is I say you form your dreams first. And you can't judge whether you're going to achieve those dreams-

    8. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    9. RD

      ... because you haven't learned the things that you're going to learn on the way toward those dreams, okay?

    10. LF

      Right.

    11. RD

      So, if, that isn't delusion. I wouldn't use delusion. I think you're over-emphasizing the importance of knowing whether you're going to succeed or not. Get rid of that, okay?

    12. LF

      (laughs)

    13. RD

      If you can get rid of that-

    14. LF

      Yeah.

    15. RD

      ... and say, "Okay, no, I can have that dream," but I'm so realistic in the notion of finding out, I'm curious, I'm a great learner, I'm a great experimenter, along the way, you'll do those experiments which will teach you more truths and more learning about the reality, so that you can get your dreams. Because if you still live in that world of delusion, okay?

    16. LF

      Yeah.

    17. RD

      And you think delusion's helpful. No, the delusion isn't...

    18. LF

      (laughs)

    19. RD

      Don't confuse delusion with not knowing.

    20. LF

      Yes. But nevertheless, so if we look at the abyss, we can look at your own that you describe, it's difficult psychologically for people, so m-many people quit, many people choose a path that is more comfortable than, I mean, that, the heartbreak of that, you know, breaks people, so if you have the dream and then there's this cycle of learning, setting a goal and so on, what's your value for the psychology of just being broken by these difficult moments?

    21. RD

      Well, that's, that's classically the defining moment. It's almost like evolution taking care of, okay, now you-

    22. LF

      Yeah.

    23. RD

      ... you crash, you're in the abyss. Oh my God, that's bad. And then the question is, what do you do? And it sorts people, okay?

    24. LF

      (laughs)

    25. RD

      And that's what, that's-

    26. LF

      Okay.

    27. RD

      Some people get off the field and they say, "Oh, I don't like this," and so on.

    28. LF

      Yeah.

    29. RD

      And some people learn and they have-

    30. LF

      Got it.

  7. 24:38 – 27:39

    Idea meritocracy

    1. RD

      gave me.

    2. LF

      So, if we can linger on a little bit longer the idea of an idea meritocracy, it's fascinating, but especially because it seems to be rare, not just in companies but in society. So there is a lot of people on Twitter and public discourse and politics and so on that are really stuck in certain sets of ideas, whatever they are. So when you're confronted with a, with an idea that sa- that's different than your own about a particular topic, what kind of process do you go through mentally? Are you arguing through the idea with the person, sort of present it almost like a debate? Or do you sit on it and consider the world sort of empathetically, if this is true, uh, then what does that world look like, does that world make sense? And so on. So what's the process of considering those conflicting ideas for you?

    3. RD

      I'm gonna answer that question, but after saying first imp- almost implicit in your question is it's not common, okay? What's common produces only common results.

    4. LF

      (laughs)

    5. RD

      Okay? So don't judge-

    6. LF

      Yes. Yes,

    7. RD

      ... anything that is good based on whether it's common, 'cause you're, it's only gonna give you common results. If you want unique, you have a unique approach.

    8. LF

      Yes.

    9. RD

      Okay? And so that art of thoughtful disagreement is the, is the capacity to hold two things in your mind at the same time.

    10. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    11. RD

      The, "Gee, I think this makes sense," and then saying, "I'm not sure it makes sense." And then try to say, "Why does it make sense?" And then to triangulate with others. So if I'm having a discussion like that and I work myself through, and I'm not sure, um, then, uh, I, I have to do that in a good way. So I always give attention, for example, what, let's start off what does the other person know relative to what I know?

    12. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    13. RD

      So i- i- if a person has a higher expertise or things, I'm much more inclined to ask questions. I'm always asking questions. If you wanna learn, you're asking questions, you're not arguing, okay? You're taking in, you're assessing when it comes into you. Does that make sense? Are you learning something? Are you getting epiphanies? And so on. And I try to then do that. If, uh, if the conversation, um, i- as we're trying to decide what is true and we're trying to do that together and we see truth different, then I might even call in, uh, another really smart, capable person and try to say, "What is true and how do we explore that together?" And you go through that same thing. So I would, I said, uh, I, I describe it as having open-mindedness and assertiveness at the same time.

    14. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    15. RD

      That you can simultaneously be open-minded and take in with that curiosity and then also be assertive and say, "But that doesn't make sense. Why would this be the case?" And you do that back and forth.

  8. 27:39 – 32:59

    Is credit good for society?

    1. RD

    2. LF

      And when you're doing that kind of back and forth on the topic like the economy, which you, you have, to me, perhaps I'm naive, but it seems both incredible and incredibly complex, the economy, the, uh, trading, the transactions, that these transactions between two individuals somehow add up to this giant mechanism. You've put out a 30-minute video, you have a lot of incredible videos online that people should definitely watch, uh, on, on YouTube, but you've put out this 30-minute video titled How the Economic Machine Works that is probably one of the best, if not the best video I've seen on the internet (laughs) in terms of educational videos. So people should definitely watch it, especially because it's not that, um, the individual components of the video are somehow revolutionary, but the simplicity and the clarity of the different components just makes you... There's a few light bulb moments there about what, how the economy works as a machine. So as you described, there's three main forces that drive the economy, productivity growth, short-term debt cycle, long-term debt cycle. The, the former, productivity growth, is how valuable things be-... how much value, uh, people create, valuable things people create. The latter is, uh, people borrowing from the, their future selves, to hopefully create those valuable things faster. So, this is an incredible system to me, maybe we can linger on it a little bit. But you've also said what most p- people think about as money is actually credit. Total amount of credit in the US is $50 trillion, total amount of money is $3 trillion. That's just crazy to me. Maybe, maybe I'm silly, maybe you can educate me, but that seems crazy. It gives me just pause that human civilization has been able to create a system that has so much credit. So, w- that- that's a long way to ask, um, do you think credit is (laughs) good or bad for society? That system of, that's so fundamentally based on credit.

    3. RD

      I think credit is great, even though people o- often overdo it. Credit is that somebody has earned money.

    4. LF

      Yeah.

    5. RD

      And, uh, y- you know, and what happens is they lend it to somebody else who's got better ideas, and they cut a deal, and then that person with the better ideas is gonna pay it back. And if it works well, it helps resource allocations go well, providing people l- like the entrepreneurs and all of those, they need capital. They don't have capital themselves, and so somebody's gonna give them capital and they'll give them credit and along those lines. Then what happens is it's not managed well in a variety of ways. So I did another book on principles, Principles of Big Debt Crises, that go into that. And it's free, by the way. I m- put it free online, um, on-

    6. LF

      Ah, nice.

    7. RD

      ... as a PDF. Uh, so if you go online and you look, uh, Principles for Big Debt Crises is under my name. You can download it in a PDF or you can buy a print book of it. And it goes through that particular process. And so you always have it overdone in always the same way. Everything, by the way, almost everything happens over and over again for the same reasons, okay? So these debt crises all happen over and over again for the same reasons. They get it overdone. The, in the book, it explains how you identify whether it's overdone or not. They get it overdone, and then you go through the process of making the adjustments according that, and then, and it explains how they can use the levers and so on. If you didn't have credit, then you would be sort of, everybody'd sort of be stuck. So, um, credit, uh, uh, uh, i- is a good thing, but it can easily be overdone. So now we get into the que- what is money? What is credit?

    8. LF

      Yeah.

    9. RD

      Okay? You get into money and credit. So if you're holding credit and you think that's worthwhile, keep in mind that the central bank, let's say it can print the money. What does that prom- They, you, you have an IOU, and the IOU says you're gonna get a certain number of dollars, let's say, or, uh, yen or euros, and that is what the IOU is. And so the question is, will you get that money and w- and what will it be worth?

    10. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    11. RD

      And then also you have a gov, a, a government which is a participant in that process-

    12. LF

      Right.

    13. RD

      ... 'cause they want, they are on the hook. They owe money. And then will they print the money to make it easy for everybody to pay? So you have to pay attention to those two. I would suggest, like you, you recommend to other people, just take that 30 minutes and it, and it, and it comes across pretty clearly. But the m- my conclusion is that of course you want it, and even if you understand, um, it and the cycles well, you can benefit from those cycles rather than to be hurt by those cycles. Because I don't know, uh, the way the cycle works is somebody gets over-indebted, they have to sell an asset, okay, then I don't know may- That's when assets become cheaper. How do you acquire the asset? It's a whole process.

  9. 32:59 – 37:13

    What is money?

    1. RD

    2. LF

      So again, maybe a- anoth- another dumb question, but, uh-

    3. RD

      There are no such things as dumb questions to me.

    4. LF

      Oh, there you go. But what is money? (laughs) So you've mentioned, y- you know, credit and money. It, uh... Another thing that if I just zoom out from an alien perspective and look at human civilization, it's incredible that we've created a thing that's not, that only works because currency because we all agree it has value. So, uh, uh, I guess my question is, how do you think about money as this emergent phenomenon, and what do you think is the future of money? You've commented on Bitcoin, other forms. What do you think is, uh, its history and future? How do you think about money?

    5. RD

      There are two things that money is for. It's a medium of exchange, and it's a storehold of wealth.

    6. LF

      Yes.

    7. RD

      That's, that, that... So money, you know, the... So you could say something's a medium of exchange, and then you could say, is it a storehold of wealth, okay? So those, the... And money is that vehicle that is those things, and can be used to pay off your debt. So when you have a debt and you provide it, it pays off your debt. So that, that's that process. Um-

    8. LF

      And it's, uh, um, s- uh, I apologize to interrupt, but it only can be a medium of exchange or a store of wealth when everybody recognizes it to be of value.

    9. RD

      That's right.

    10. LF

      Right.

    11. RD

      And so you see in the history and you, around the world and you go to places. Um, I was in, um, an island in the Pacific in which they had, as money, these big stones. And literally, they were taking a boat-

    12. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    13. RD

      ... this, this, this big carved stone, and they were taking it from one of the islands to the other, and it sank. The, the, the-... piece of this big stone piece of money that they had, and it went to the bottom, and they still perceived it as having value. So that e- it was, even though it was in the bottom, and it's this big hunk of rock, the fact that somebody owned it, they would say, "Oh, I'll, I'll own it for this and that." I've seen, uh, beads in different places, shells converted to this in mediums of exchange, and when we look at what we've got, you're exactly right. It is the notion that if I give it to you, I can then take it and I can buy something with it, and that's... So, it's a matter of perception, okay. And then we go through then the history of money, and the vulnerabilities of money. And what we have is, um, there's, through history, there's been two types of money. Those that are claims on something of value.

    14. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    15. RD

      Uh, like the connection of, to gold or something.

    16. LF

      That's right.

    17. RD

      Um, that, that would be. And, or, they just are money without any connection, which, and then we have a system now, which is a fiat monetary system. So that's what money is. Then it will last as long as it's kept of value and it works that way. So let's say central banks, when they get in the position of, like, they owe a lot of money, like we have the, in the case, it's increasingly the case, and they also then are a bind, and they have the printing press to print the money and get out of that, and you have a lot of people who might be in that position. Then you can print it, and then it could be devalued-

    18. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    19. RD

      ... in there. And so history has shown, forget about today, history has shown that no currency, um, has la- ha- every currency has either ended as being a currency, been, or devalued as a currency over periods of time, long periods of time. So it evolves and it changes, but everybody needs that medium ex- of exchange, and everybody needs that store hold of wealth, so it keeps changing what is money over a period of time.

    20. LF

      But

  10. 37:13 – 41:01

    Bitcoin and digital currency

    1. LF

      so much is being digitized today, and there's these ideas that are based on the blockchain of Bitcoin and so on. So if all currencies, like all empires, come to an end, what do you think will, um, do you think something like Bitcoin might emerge as, as a common store of value, uh, store of wealth, and a medium of exchange?

    2. RD

      The problem with Bitcoin is that a- it's not a, an effective medium of exchange. Like, it's not easy for me to go in there and buy things with it. And then it's not an effective store hold of value because it has a volatility that's based on speculation and the like. So you, y- it's not a very effective saving. That's very different from, um, Facebook's pro- of a stable value currency, which would be effective as both a medium of exchange and a store hold of wealth, because if you were to hold it, and then it, the way it's linked to, number of things that it's linked to, would mean that it could be a very effective store hold of wealth. And then you have a digital currency that could be a very effective medium of exchange and store hold of wealth.

    3. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    4. RD

      That, so, in my opinion, some digital currencies are likely to s- succeed more or less based on that ability to do it. Then the question is, what happens?

    5. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    6. RD

      Okay, what happens is, do central banks allow that to happen? I really do believe it's possible to get a better form of money that central banks don't control, okay? A better f- force of money that p- central banks don't control. But then, um, th- that's not yet happened, and we also have to, and so they've got to go through that evolutionary process. In order to go through that evolutionary process, first of all, governments have got to allow that to happen, which is to some extent a threat to them in terms of their power, and, and that's an issue. And, and then you have to also build the confidence in all of the components of it to say, "Okay, that's going to be effective because I won't get, uh, in, I won't have problems owning it." So I think that digital currencies have a, um, have some element of potential, but there's a lot of hurdles that are going to have to be gotten over. I think that it'll be a very long time, possibly never, but anyway, a very long time before we have that, let's say, get into a position that would be, uh, in a, uh, effective means relative to gold, let's say. If you were to think of that.

    7. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    8. RD

      Because gold has a track record, you know, of thousands of years-

    9. LF

      (laughs) Right.

    10. RD

      ... and uni- all across countries.

    11. LF

      Yeah.

    12. RD

      It has its mobility. It has the ability to put it down. It has certain abilities. It's got disadvantages relative to digital currencies, but, but central banks will hold it, like their central banks that worry, uh, about others, you know, the other countries' central banks might worry about whether the US dollar is gonna print or not and that.

    13. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    14. RD

      And so the thing they're gonna go to is not gonna be the digital currency. The thing they're gonna go to is, is gold-

    15. LF

      Gold.

    16. RD

      ... or something else, some other currency. They gotta pick it. And so I think it's a long way to go.

    17. LF

      But you think it's possible that one day we don't even have a central bank because of the, uh, a, a currency that doesn't, that's, uh, cannot be controlled by the central bank is the primary currency? Or does that seem-

    18. RD

      Um-

    19. LF

      ... very unlikely?

    20. RD

      I- uh, uh, um, it would be v- very remote possibility-

    21. LF

      (laughs)

    22. RD

      ... or very long in the future.

    23. LF

      Got it.

  11. 41:01 – 46:24

    The economic machine is amazing

    1. LF

      Again, maybe a dumb question, but romanticized one. When you sit back and you look, you describe these transactions between individuals.... somehow creating, uh, short-term debt cycles, long-term debt cycles, this productivity growth. Does it amaze you that this whole thing j- works? That, that there's however many million, uh, hundreds of millions of people in the United States, globally over seven billion people, that this thing between individual transactions, it just, it works?

    2. RD

      Yeah.

    3. LF

      (laughs)

    4. RD

      It, it, it amazes me. I, like I go b- uh, uh, I go back and forth between being in it, and then I think, like, "How did a credit card r- How does that really possible?"

    5. LF

      (laughs)

    6. RD

      I'm still using... I look up credit card, I put it on. The guy doesn't know me.

    7. LF

      Yeah.

    8. RD

      I- i- i- It signs-

    9. LF

      It's all strangers.

    10. RD

      O- o- okay, we're making the digital entries. Is that really secure enough and that, that kind of thing? And then it goes back and it goes this and it clears and it all happens. And it, what I marvel at that and those types of things, is because of the f- the capacity of the human mind to create abstractions that are true.

    11. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    12. RD

      You know, it's imagination and then the ability to go from one level, and then if these things are true, then you go to the next level. And if those things are true, then you go to the next level. And all those miracles that we almost become common, it's like when I'm flying in a plane.

    13. LF

      Right.

    14. RD

      (laughs) Or when I'm looking at all of the things that happen. When I get communications in the middle of, I don't know, Africa-

    15. LF

      Yeah.

    16. RD

      ... or Antarctica, and we're communicating in the ways wh- where I see the face on my iPad of somebody-

    17. LF

      Yeah.

    18. RD

      ... my grandkid in, uh, some place else, and I look at this and I say, "Wow." Yes.

    19. LF

      (laughs)

    20. RD

      It, it, it, it all amazes me.

    21. LF

      So while being amazing, do you have a sense, the principles you described, that the whole thing is stable somehow also? Or is this, are we just lucky? (laughs) So the, the principles that you described, are those describing a system that's, is stable, robust, and will remain so? Or is it a lucky accident of our early history?

    22. RD

      My area of expertise is economics and markets, so I get down to like a real nitty-gritty.

    23. LF

      Yes.

    24. RD

      I can't tell you whether the plane is going to fall out of the sky-

    25. LF

      Yes.

    26. RD

      ... because of its particular fundamentals. I don't know enough about that, but it happens over and over again-

    27. LF

      (laughs)

    28. RD

      ... and so on. It gives me faith, okay?

    29. LF

      Yeah.

    30. RD

      So without me knowing it. In the markets, in the economy, I know those things clo- well enough, in a sense, to say, uh, that by and large, um, that structure is right, what we're seeing is right. Now, whether there are disruptions and it has effects that can come, not because that structure is right, and I believe it's right, but whether it can be, um, hurt by, let's say, connectivity or journal entries. They could take from, all the money away from you through your digital entries.

  12. 46:24 – 58:55

    Principle for using AI

    1. LF

      Let me talk about, uh, if we could, about AI a little bit. So you've, uh, at Bridgewater Associates, uh, managed about $160 billion in assets. And our artificial intelligence systems algorithms are pretty good with data. What role in the future do you see AI play in analysis and decision-making in this kind of data rich and impactful, uh, area of, uh, investment?

    2. RD

      I'm going to answer that not only in investment, but I give a more-

    3. LF

      Generally.

    4. RD

      ... all-encompassing rule, uh, for AI. As I think you know, for the last 25 years, uh, we have taken our thinking and put them in algorithms, and so we make decisions that c- the computer, um, takes those-... criteria algorithms, and they put them, uh, they're in there and it takes data, and they operate as an independent decision maker par- in parallel with our decision-making. So for me, it's like there's a chess game playing, um, and I'm a person, uh, with my chess game, and I'm saying, "It made that move, and I'm making the move, and how do I compare those two moves?"

    5. LF

      Yes.

    6. RD

      So, we've done a lot. But let me give you an, a rule. If the future can be different from the past, and you don't have deep understanding, you should not rely on AI.

    7. LF

      (sighs)

    8. RD

      Okay? Those two things.

    9. LF

      Deep understanding of...

    10. RD

      The cause-effect relationships that are leading you to place that bet, in anything. Okay? E- anything important. Let's say if it was do surgeries, and you would say, "How do I do surgeries?" I think it's totally fine to watch all the doctors do the surgeries. You can put it on, uh, uh, take a, um, a digital camera and do that, convert that into AI algorithms that go to re- robots-

    11. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    12. RD

      ... and have them do surgeries, and I'd be comfortable with that. Because if it'll do the, if it keeps doing the same thing over and over again, and you have enough of that, that would be fine, even though you may not understand the algorithms, because you're, if the thing's happening over and over again, and you're not asking... The future would be the same.

    13. LF

      Yes.

    14. RD

      That appendicitis, or whatever it is, will be handled the same way, the surgery, that's fine. However, what happens with AI is, for the most part, is it takes a lot of data and it, um, with a high enough sample size-

    15. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    16. RD

      ... and then it puts together its own algorithms. Okay, there are two ways you can come up with algorithms. You can either take your thinking-

    17. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    18. RD

      ... and express them in algorithms, or you can say, "Let," put the data in and say, "What is the algorithm?"

    19. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    20. RD

      When you... That's machine learning.

    21. LF

      Yeah.

    22. RD

      And when you have machine learning, um, it'll give you equations which quite often are not understandable.

    23. LF

      Yes.

    24. RD

      If you were try to say, "Okay, now describe what it's telling you," it's very difficult to describe, and so they can escape understanding. And so, it's very good for doing those things that could be done over and over again if you're watching and you're not taking that. But if the future is different from the past, and you have that, then you're, uh, uh, uh... If the future's different from the past and you don't have deep understanding, you're gonna get in trouble. And so, that's the, uh, main thing. As far as AI is concerned, AI, uh, and, uh, let's say computer replications of thinking in varied ways, I think it's particularly good for processing.

    25. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    26. RD

      Uh, uh, but, but the, the notion of what you want to do is better, most of the time, determined by the human mind, the, what are the principles? Like, okay, how should I raise my children?

    27. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    28. RD

      It's gonna be a long time before AI, you're going to say, "Uh, it has a good enough judgment to do that." Who should I marry?

    29. LF

      Yeah.

    30. RD

      Uh, all of those things. Maybe you can get the computer to help you. But if you just took data and did machine learning, it's not gonna find it. If you were to then take one of my criteria for, um, any of those questions, and then say, put them into an algorithm, you'd be a lot better off than if you took AI to do it. But by and large, the mind should be do- used for inventing and those creative things, um, and then the computer should be used for processing, 'cause it could process a lot more information a lot faster, a lot more accurately, and a lot less emotionally. So, any th- notion of thinking in the form of processing-type thinking-

  13. 58:55 – 1:01:31

    Human irrationality

    1. RD

    2. LF

      So th- what's your intuition, if we look at future societies, do you think we'll be able to, uh, reduce a lot of the, the details of our lives down to principles that would be further and further automated?

    3. RD

      I think the real question hinges on people's emotional emotions and irrational behaviors. I think that there's subliminal things that we want.

    4. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    5. RD

      Okay? And then there's cerebral, uh, you know, conscious logic.

    6. LF

      Yes.

    7. RD

      Oh, and the two often are at odds. So, uh, there's almost, like, two yous in you, right?

    8. LF

      Yeah.

    9. RD

      And, um, so let's say, what do you want? And, um, eh, uh, your mind'll answer one thing, your emotions'll answer something else. So when I think about it, I think emotions are-... I want inspiration, I want love is a good thing-

    10. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    11. RD

      ... being able to have a good impact. But it is in the reconciliation of your subliminal wants and your intellectual wants, so that you really say they're aligned.

    12. LF

      Yes.

    13. RD

      And so to do that in a way to get what you want, so irrationality is a bad thing if it, if it means that it doesn't make sense in getting you what you want. But you better decide which you you're satisfying. Is it the lower level you, emotional/subliminal one, or is it the other? But if you can align them, so what I find is that by going from my, your, you experience the decision, do this thing, subliminally-

    14. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    15. RD

      ... and that's the thing I want, it comes to the surface.

    16. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    17. RD

      I find that if I can align that with what my logical me wants, and does, do the debel- double-check between them, and I get the same sort of thing, that that helps me a lot. I find, for example, meditation is one of the things that helps to achieve that alignment. It's fantastic for achieving that alignment.

    18. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    19. RD

      And often then, I also wanna not just do it in my head, I wanna say, "Does that make sense?" Help y- y- and so I do it with other people-

    20. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    21. RD

      ... and I say, "Okay, well, let's say I want this thing," and whatever, "does that make sense?" And when you do that kind of triangulation, your two yous, and you do that with also the other way, then, um, you certainly wanna be rational, right? But rationality has to be defined by those things.

    22. LF

      And then you discover sort of new ideas that, uh, that drive your future. So

  14. 1:01:31 – 1:03:26

    Call for adventure at the edge of principles

    1. LF

      it's always, you're always at the edge of the set of principles you've developed. You're doing new things always.

    2. RD

      Right.

    3. LF

      So that's where the intellect is needed. <|agent|><|en|>

    4. RD

      Well, and the inspiration.

    5. LF

      (laughs)

    6. RD

      The inspiration is needed to do that, right? Like what are you doing it for?

    7. LF

      So what is that thing-

    8. RD

      It's the excitement-

    9. LF

      What is that thing? What, what's there?

    10. RD

      ... the adventure, the curiosity, the hunger.

    11. LF

      What's, uh, if you can be Freud for a second, what's in that subconscious? What, what's the thing that drives us? The cau-

    12. RD

      I, I think you can't generalize of us. I think different people are driven by different things. There's not a common one, right? So, uh, like if you would take the shapers, I think it is a combination of, subliminally, it's a combination of excitement, curiosity-

    13. LF

      Is there a dark element there? Is there, is there demons? Is there fears? Is there, in your sense, something dark that drives them?

    14. RD

      Most of the ones, most of the ones that I'm dealing with, uh, I have not seen that.

    15. LF

      Yeah.

    16. RD

      I, I, I see the, what I really see is, "Hoo, if I can do that-"

    17. LF

      (laughs)

    18. RD

      "... that would be the most dream." And then the act of creativity-

    19. LF

      Got it.

    20. RD

      ... and you say, "Ooh." So excitement is one of the things. Curiosity-

    21. LF

      Yes.

    22. RD

      ... is a big pull, okay? And then tenacity, you know, okay, at the, to do those things. But definitely emotions are entering into it. Then there's an intellectual component of it too, okay? It may be empathy. It may, "Can I have an impact?"

    23. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    24. RD

      "Can I have an impact?" The, the desire to have an impact, that's an emotional thrill, and, but it also, it has empathy, and then you start to see spirituality. By spirituality, I mean the connectedness to the whole. You start to see people operate those things. Those tend to be the things that you see the most of.

    25. LF

      And I think you're gonna sh- shut down this idea completely, but,

  15. 1:03:26 – 1:04:30

    The line between madness and genius

    1. LF

      uh, there's a notion that some of these shapers really walk the line between sort of madness and genius. Do you think madness has a role in any of this? Or do you still see Steve Jobs and Elon Musk as fundamentally rational?

    2. RD

      Yeah, there's a continuum there. And what comes to my mind is that genius is at, at often at the edge, uh, in some cases, imaginary genius-

    3. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    4. RD

      ... is o- at the edge of insanity. And, and it's almost like a radio that I think-

    5. LF

      (laughs)

    6. RD

      ... "Okay, if I can tune it just right, it's playing right, but if I go a little bit too far-"

    7. LF

      Yeah.

    8. RD

      "... it goes off."

    9. LF

      Yeah.

    10. RD

      Okay? And so you can, you can see this. Um, Kay Jamison was studying bipolar. What it shows is that, you know, that's definitely the case 'cause when you're going out there, that imagination, whatever, but is that the, can be near the edge sometimes.

    11. LF

      (laughs)

    12. RD

      Doesn't have to always

  16. 1:04:30 – 1:07:28

    Automation

    1. RD

      be.

    2. LF

      So let me ask you about automation. The, that's been a, a part of public discourse recently. What's your view on the impact of automation, of whether we're talking about AI or more basic forms of automation on the economy in the short term and the long term? Do you have concerns about it as some do, or do you think it's overblown?

    3. RD

      It's not overblown. I mean, it's a, it's a giant thing. It'll come at us in a very big way and, um, in the future, we're, we're right at the edge of even really accelerating it. It's had a big impact, and it will have a big impact. And it's a two-edged sword because, um, it'll have, uh, tremendous benefits, and at the same time, it has profound benefits in employment and distributions of wealth, because I, the way I, I think, think about it is there are certain things human beings can do, and over time, we've, uh, evolved to go to almost higher and higher levels-

    4. LF

      (laughs)

    5. RD

      ... and now we're almost like we're at this level, you know? It used to be your labor-

    6. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    7. RD

      ... and you would then do your labor and okay, we can get past the labor. We got tractors and things, and you go up, up, up, up, up, and we're up over here and, and, uh, to the point in our minds where, okay, um, anything...... related to mental processing, the computer can probably do better, and we can find that. And so other than almost inventing, um, you're at a point where, um, the com- the machines and the automation will probably do it better. And- and that's accelerating, and that's a force, and that's a force for the good, and at the same time, it, what it does is it displaces people in terms of employment and changes, and it produces wealth gaps and all of that. So, I think the real issue is that that has to be viewed as, um, a national emergency. In other words, I think the wealth, the wealth gap, the in- the income gap, the opportunity gap, all of those things, that force is creating the problems that we're having today. A lot of the problems, the- the great polarity, the disenfranchised, e- dis- fe- not equal, not anything approaching equality of education. All of these problems, a lot of problems are coming as a result of that. And so, there n- n- it needs to be viewed really as an emergency situation in which there's a good work, good plan, um, worked out for how to deal with that effectively, so that, um, it's dealt with effectively. So, because it- it's- it's- it- it- you know, it's good for the average, it's good for the impact, but it's not good for everyone and it creates that polarity, so it's gotta be dealt with.

    8. LF

      Yeah,

  17. 1:07:28 – 1:14:02

    American dream

    1. LF

      and you've talked about the American dream and that that's something that all people should have an opportunity for, and that we need to reform capitalism to give that opportunity for everyone. Let me ask on, uh, on, uh, one of the ideas in terms of safety nets that support that kind of opportunity. There's been a lot of discussion of universal basic income amongst people, so there's Andrew Yang who's running on that as- he's a political candidate running for president on the idea of the universal basic income. What do you think about that? Giving $1,000 or some amount of money to everybody as a way to give them the- the padding, the freedom to sort of take leaps, to take the call for adventure, to take the crazy, uh, pursuits?

    2. RD

      Before I get right into the- my thoughts on universal basic income, I wanna start with the- the notion that opportunity, education, development, creating equality so that you- people say there's equal opportunity-

    3. LF

      Okay.

    4. RD

      ... and- a- a- and- and- is the most important thing, and then to find out what is the amount? How are you going to provide that? What- where- what- how does it- how do you get the money into a public school system? How do you get the teaching? How do you- what do you ... The fleshing out that plan to create equal opportunity i- in all of its various forms is the most pressing thing to do, and so I'm, you know, that is that. It-

    5. LF

      The opportunity, the most important one, you're kind of implying is the earlier the better, sort of, like, opportunity, so education. So, in the early development of a human being is when you should have the equal opportunities, that's the most important?

    6. RD

      Right. In the first phase of your life which goes from birth until you're on your own and you're an adult and you're now out there-

    7. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    8. RD

      ... and you deal with early childhood development, okay, and you take the brain and you say, "What's important?" The childcare, okay, like, the, uh, it- it makes a world of difference, for example, if you have good parents who are trying to think about in- instilling the stability in a non-traumatic environment to provide them. So I would say the good guidance that normally comes from parents and the good education that they're receiving i- uh, um, are, you know, the most important things in that person's development. The ability to be able to be prepared to go out there and then to go into a market that's an equal opportunity job market, to be able to then go into that kind of market is a system that creates not only fairness, anything else is not fair, and then in addition to that, it also is a more effective economic system because the consequences of not doing that o- to a society are devastating. If you look at what the ou- difference in outcomes for, uh, somebody who completes high school or doesn't complete high school or does, uh, each one of those sta- changes-

    9. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    10. RD

      ... and you look at what that means in terms of their costs to society, not only themselves, but their cost and incarceration costs and then a- and crimes and all of those things, it's economically better for the society and it's fairer if they can compl- if they can get those particular things. Once they have those things, then you move on to other things. But yes, from birth all the way through that process, anything less than that is, um, bad, is a tragedy and s- and so on. So, that's what I'm, that's, yeah, those are the things that I'm estima- and I'm, so my, uh, my, what I would want above all else is to provide that. So s- with that in mind, now we'll talk about universal basic income.

    11. LF

      (laughs) Start with that-

    12. RD

      Okay.

    13. LF

      ... and now we can talk about UBI, right?

    14. RD

      Well, right, because you have to have that.

    15. LF

      Yes.

    16. RD

      Now, the question is what's the best way to provide that, okay?

    17. LF

      Yes.

    18. RD

      So, when I look at UBI, I really think is what is going to happen with that $1,000?... okay? And will that $1,000 come from another program? Does that come from an early childhood developmental program? Who are you giving the $1,000 to and what will they do for that $1,000?

    19. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    20. RD

      I mean, like, my m- reaction would be, I think it's a great thing that everybody should have almost $1,000 in their bank and so on, but when do they get to make decisions or who's the parent? A lot of ti- times you can give $1,000 to somebody and it could have a negative result. It can have, you know, they can use that money detrimentally, not just productively. And if that money's coming away from some of those other things that are gonna produce the things I want-

    21. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    22. RD

      ... and you're shifted to, um, let's say, to come in and give a check, doesn't mean its outcomes are going to be good in providing those things that I think are so fundamental, important. If it was just everybody can have $1,000 and use it, so when the time comes-

    23. LF

      Use it well, right. (laughs)

    24. RD

      ... and use it well, that would be really, really good because e- oh, it's almost like everybody... You'd wish everybody could have $1,000 worth of wiggle room-

    25. LF

      Yeah.

    26. RD

      ... in their lives, okay? And I, I, I think that would be great. I, I love that. But we... I wanna make sure that these other things that are taken care of. So if it comes out of that budget, and, um, you know, I don't want it to come out of that budget that's going to be doing those things.

    27. LF

      (laughs) .

    28. RD

      And I, uh, you know, so-

    29. LF

      Yeah.

    30. RD

      ... you have to figure it out.

  18. 1:14:02 – 1:19:48

    Can money buy happiness?

    1. LF

      You're, if I may say so, one of the richest people in the world, so you're a good person to ask. Does money buy happiness?

    2. RD

      No. It's been shown that, um, between... Um, once you get over a basic level of income so that you can take care of the pain, then, you know, you can... health and whatever, there's no correlation between the level of happiness that one has and the level of money that one has. The, the, that w- thing that has the highest correlation is quality relationships with others, community. If you look at surveys of these things across all surveys in all societies, it's a s- if, um, a, um, sense of community and per- interpersonal relationships. That is not in any way correlated with money. You can go down to native tribes and, you know, very poor places or you can go in all different communities and so they have the opportunity to have that. I'm very lucky in that I started with nothing, so I had the full range.

    3. LF

      (laughs) .

    4. RD

      I can tell you, I, I, you know, by not having money but, bu- b- and then having quite a lot of money and I, you know, I did that in the right order. Okay?

    5. LF

      So you started from nothing in Long Island?

    6. RD

      Yep. And my dad was a jazz musician, but I, I, but I-

    7. LF

      Yeah.

    8. RD

      ... had all really that I needed because I had two parents who loved me and c- took good care of me and I went to a public school that was a good public school and basically, you know, that you, you don't need much more than that in order to... That's the equal opportunity part. Anyway, what I'm saying is, know I experienced the range and s- and there are many studies on the answer to your question. No, money does not bring happiness. It bring... Money gives you an ability to make choices.

    9. LF

      Does it get in the way, in any way, of forming those deep, meaningful relationships?

    10. RD

      It can. There are lots of ways that it makes negative... That's one of them. It could stand in the way of that, yes. Okay? But I could almost list the ways (laughs) that it could stand... it could be a problem.

    11. LF

      Yeah. What does it buy? So if you can elaborate, you mentioned f- uh, a bit of freedom.

    12. RD

      At the most fundamental level, doesn't take a whole lot but it de- takes enough that, um, you can take care of your- yourself and your family to be able to learn, do the basics of... ha- have the relationships, have health care, the basics of those types of things, you know, you can cover the basics. And then to have maybe enough security, but maybe not too much security?

    13. LF

      (laughs) That's right, yeah.

    14. RD

      That y- that you, um, uh, uh, uh, essentially are okay. Okay? That is, that's really good.

    15. LF

      Yeah.

    16. RD

      And you don't... That's what a l- that's what money will get you.

    17. LF

      And everything else is, uh... could go either way.

    18. RD

      Well-

    19. LF

      There's no correlation with-

    20. RD

      No, there's more.

    21. LF

      There's more.

    22. RD

      Okay? Then beyond that, what it then starts to do... That's the most important thing.

    23. LF

      Yes.

    24. RD

      But beyond that, what it stents to, uh, wants to do is to help to make your dreams happen in various ways.

    25. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    26. RD

      Okay? So for example, now I th- I, uh, you know, like in my case, it's a... Those dreams might not be just my own dreams, they're, they're impact on others' dreams. Okay? So uh, um, my own dreams might be, um, I don't know, I can pass along these... at my stage in life, I could pass along these principles to you and I can give those things or I can, um, do whatever it... I, I can go on an adventure, I can, uh, start a business, I can do those other things, be produc- I can self-actualize-

    27. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    28. RD

      ... in ways that might be not possible otherwise.And so, that's, that's my own belief. And then in adu- and I can also help others. I mean, this is, you know, to the extent when you get older, and with time, and whatever very ... you start to feel connected, spiritual, spirituality, that's what I'm referring to. You can start to have an effect on others that's beneficial and so on. Gives you the ability. I could tell you that, um, pe- people who are very wealthy, who have that, uh, feel that they don't have enough money. Bill Gates-

    29. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    30. RD

      ... will feel almost broke because relative to the things he'd like to accomplish, uh, th- through the Gates Foundation and things like that, you know, oh, my God, he doesn't have enough money to accomplish the things he wishes for. But those things are not ... you know, they're not the most fundamental things. So, I think that people sometimes think money has value. Money doesn't have value. The money is, like you say, just a medium of exchange at a store, although-

  19. 1:19:48 – 1:28:01

    Work-life balance and the arc of life

    1. RD

      and wealth.

    2. LF

      So let me ask you in terms of the idea of, um ... so m- m- much of your passions in life has been through something you might be able to call work. Uh, Alan Watts has this quote, he said that, "The, the real key to life, secret to life is to be completely engaged with what you're doing in the here and now, and instead of calling it work, realize it is play." So, I'd like to ask, what is the role of work in your life's journey, or in a life's journey, and what do you think about this modern idea of kind of separating work and li- work/life balance?

    3. RD

      I have a principle that I believe in is, make your work and your passion the same thing.

    4. LF

      Okay.

    5. RD

      Okay. So that's similar view-

    6. LF

      So that's-

    7. RD

      Uh, uh, uh, in other words, if you can make your work and your passion, it's just gonna work out great and ... then, of course, people have different purposes of work.

    8. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    9. RD

      And I don't wanna be theoretical about that. People have to take care of their family, so money, at a certain point, is, um, the base, is an important component of that work, so you look beyond that. What are you ... what is the money gonna get you and what are you trying to achieve? But the most important thing, I agree, is meaningful work and meaningful relationships. Like, if you can get into the thing that you're ... your mission that you're on, and you are excited about that mission that you're on, and then you can do that with people who you have the meaningful relationships-

    10. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    11. RD

      ... with, you have meaningful work and meaningful relationships, I mean, that is fabulous for most people.

    12. LF

      And it seems that many people struggle to get there, not out of, um ... not necessarily because they're constrained by the fact that they have the financial constraints of having to, uh, provide for their family and so on, but it's ... I mean, mo- you know, there's ideas out there that there needs to be a work/life balance, which means that most people, and (laughs) this, we're gonna return to the same thing, is most doesn't mean optimal, but most people seem to not be doing their life's passion, not be ... not unifying work and passion. Why do you think that is? Is-

    13. RD

      Well, the work/life balance, there's a life arc that you go through.

    14. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    15. RD

      Starts at zero and ends somewhere in the vicinity of 80, and there is a phase, and there's a ... and you could look at the different degrees of happiness that happen in those phases, I can go through that if that was interesting, but we don't have-

    16. LF

      Yeah.

    17. RD

      ... time probably for it. But you get in the part of the life, the r- the ... that part of the life which has the lowest level of happiness is age 45 to 55.

    18. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    19. RD

      And, and, and because as you move into this second phase of your life, you know, the first phase of your life is when you're learning dependent on others, second phase of your life is when you're working and others are dependent on you, and you're trying to be successful. And in that phase of one's life you encounter the work/life balance challenge-

    20. LF

      Yes.

    21. RD

      ... because you're trying to be successful at work, and successful at parenting, and successful and successful in all those dem- things that take your demand. And they get into that, and I understand that problem in the work/life balance. The issue is primarily to know how to approach that, okay? So, um, I, I understand it's stressful, it produces stress, and it produces bad results, and it produces the lowest level of happiness in one's life. It's interesting, as you get later in life, the levels of happiness rise, and the highest level of happiness is between ages 70 and 80, which is interesting-

    22. LF

      (laughs)

    23. RD

      ... for other reasons. But in that-

    24. LF

      The key-

    25. RD

      ... spot, I want ... and that ... and, and the key to work/life balance is to realize and to learn how to get more out of an hour of life. Okay? Because an hour of, of work-What people are thinking is that they have to make a choice between one thing and another, and of course, they, they do. But they don't realize that if they develop the skill to get, um, a lot more out of an hour, it's the equivalent of having many more hours in your life.

    26. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    27. RD

      And so, you know, that's why in the book Principles, I try to go into, okay, now how can you get a lot more out of e- out of an hour? That allows you to get more life into your life and it reduces the work/life balance.

    28. LF

      And that's the primary struggle in that 35 to 45... You know, uh, if you could linger on that, w- so what are the ups and downs of life in terms of happiness, in general and perhaps in your own life when you look back at the moments, the peaks?

    29. RD

      It's pretty, pretty much the same pattern. Early in one's life is, uh, tends to be a very happy period all the way up, and 16 is like a really great happy... Uh, you know, I think, uh, like myself, you, you start to get e- elements of freedom, you get your driver's license-

    30. LF

      Yeah.

Episode duration: 1:30:20

Install uListen for AI-powered chat & search across the full episode — Get Full Transcript

Transcript of episode M95m2EFb7IQ

Get more out of YouTube videos.

High quality summaries for YouTube videos. Accurate transcripts to search & find moments. Powered by ChatGPT & Claude AI.