Skip to content
Lex Fridman PodcastLex Fridman Podcast

Shannon Curry: Johnny Depp & Amber Heard Trial, Marriage, Dating & Love | Lex Fridman Podcast #366

Dr. Shannon Curry is a clinical and forensic psychologist who conducts research, therapy, and clinical evaluation pertaining to trauma, violence, and relationships. She testified in the Johnny Depp and Amber Heard trial. Please support this podcast by checking out our sponsors: - Factor: https://factormeals.com/lex50 and use code lex50 to get 50% off your first box - BetterHelp: https://betterhelp.com/lex to get 10% off - House of Macadamias: https://houseofmacadamias.com/lex and use code LEX to get 20% off your first order EPISODE LINKS: Shannon's Instagram: https://instagram.com/currypsychgroup Curry Psychology Group: https://currypsychology.com/ PODCAST INFO: Podcast website: https://lexfridman.com/podcast Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/2lwqZIr Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2nEwCF8 RSS: https://lexfridman.com/feed/podcast/ Full episodes playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLrAXtmErZgOdP_8GztsuKi9nrraNbKKp4 Clips playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLrAXtmErZgOeciFP3CBCIEElOJeitOr41 OUTLINE: 0:00 - Introduction 1:38 - Starting a relationship 5:37 - Couples therapy 12:54 - Why relationships fail 20:11 - Drama in relationships 25:38 - Success in relationships 32:03 - Dating 40:39 - Sex 42:32 - Cheating 51:33 - Polyamory 53:24 - Johnny Depp and Amber Heard trial 1:22:02 - Forensic psychology 1:32:12 - PTSD 1:41:47 - Advice for young people 1:44:38 - Love SOCIAL: - Twitter: https://twitter.com/lexfridman - LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/lexfridman - Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lexfridman - Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/lexfridman - Medium: https://medium.com/@lexfridman - Reddit: https://reddit.com/r/lexfridman - Support on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/lexfridman

Shannon CurryguestLex Fridmanhost
Mar 21, 20231h 46mWatch on YouTube ↗

EVERY SPOKEN WORD

  1. 0:001:38

    Introduction

    1. SC

      So, contempt is criticism on steroids. This is what John Gottman calls sulfuric acid for love. Nothing will erode a relationship quicker than contempt. Contempt is when you are looking at your partner from a superior position. So, you are eye-rolling, you are name-calling, um, there's a mockery, mocking, even physical mockery, um, imitating them, imitating their voice. Contempt is meant to just take the legs out from your partner, make them feel pathetic, ridiculous, um... And it- it can be abusive, but, um, most people have engaged in contempt at some point in their relationship. Lower level would be sort of the eye-rolling, but that is the biggest predictor of a split.

    2. LF

      The following is a conversation with Shannon Curry, a clinical and forensic psychologist who conducts research, therapy, and psychological evaluations pertaining to trauma, violence, and relationships. She received worldwide attention in April of last year by giving a lengthy televised testimony on her psychological evaluation of Amber Heard during the Johnny Depp/Amber Heard trial. I found her testimony to be an eloquent description of complex psychological concepts and evaluation procedures. So, I reached out for a chat. In person, she was brilliant, funny, thoughtful, and truly kind. I really, really enjoyed this conversation. This is the Lex Fridman Podcast. To support it, please check out our sponsors in the description. And now, dear friends, here's Shannon Curry.

  2. 1:385:37

    Starting a relationship

    1. LF

      Charles Bukowski said that "Love is a fog that burns away with the first daylight of reality." I love that quote. Uh, do you think romantic love fades away in this way?

    2. SC

      Bukowski.

    3. LF

      Uh, does it- does it have to fade?

    4. SC

      The truth is that you have all of these chemicals pumping through your body, you're essentially high on heroine in the beginning of a romance, and you're going to have these rose-colored glasses on, everything your partner does is magical, uh, but really, it's the novelty. It's just like going on a vacation, you're fully present, you're just attuned to the magic of another human being moment-to-moment. And then on top of that, you have- you're just flooded with dopamine, so you're high, on drugs, and we can't go on like that. You will die if you are using these kinds of chemicals all the time, all day long. So eventually, our bodies are sort of made to dial it down, we've made it- I mean, we're evolutionary beings. We are doing the same thing we did 200,000 years ago to find a mate, procreate, spend enough time with each other that we have sex a whole bunch of times and make babies. Now, we've changed the rules of the game, we're living, you know, almost til we're 100 years old in some cases, we're making these marriage commitments that last half a century, and, uh, we're expecting (laughs) it to be all because of love, and we're signing these contracts based on how we feel when we're high on these drugs. So, (laughs) the reality is, we know based on the re- and- and I'm also talking about certain Western civilizations here, because as you know, there are arranged marriages, and a lot of times those marriages, if we're looking at longevity, are actually way more satisfied than people who are marrying for love, which logically makes sense. If you're making a decision based on a feeling that is basically based on endorphins and dopamine and oxytocin, I wouldn't sign a contract just because of a feeling, necessary- you know, for 50 years. Whereas an arranged marriage, if you have your elders kind of deciding for you that this partner has a bunch of traits that you're going to appreciate more and more over time, I think there's some wisdom there.

    5. LF

      So, you don't think that feeling could be a foundation for a 50-year relationship?

    6. SC

      Well, I don't think that specific feeling you're having based on drugs-

    7. LF

      Yeah.

    8. SC

      ... is going to be the same (laughs) feeling you have 20, 30, 40 years down the line. If you're gonna wake up and turn to your partner when you're 70 and think, "Oh my God, I'm so glad you're hot. You are so hot."

    9. LF

      Yeah.

    10. SC

      Then sure, marry for hotness.

    11. LF

      Yeah.

    12. SC

      But if you've been through life a little bit, and I think most people who are on a second marriage know, shit happens in life. It is hard, you're gonna have, you know, maybe a kid with special needs, or your dad gets dementia, um, or you get diagnosed with cancer. Who are you gonna wanna come home to? Who is going to hold you when you are sobbing on the floor and tell you, "We're gonna get through it together"? Who's gonna know the names of your kids' special ed teacher and the process for getting a 504 plan? Or is it gonna be you on your own? I think those things matter.

    13. LF

      But doesn't that hotness- don't those drugs kind of solidify into a deeper appreciation of the other person, into something you could call beauty?

    14. SC

      Yes.

    15. LF

      Uh...

    16. SC

      They can.

    17. LF

      But- but isn't that the same- isn't that the same thing? When you no- when you notice the beauty of another human being, aren't you- aren't you high on drugs still?

    18. SC

      (laughs)

    19. LF

      You're making it sound like there's like a- a brief rock star period of going on heroin-

    20. SC

      (laughs) .

    21. LF

      ... and then it's over, but, like, can't you be on heroin your whole life? A little bit-

    22. SC

      I have some good news.

    23. LF

      ... microdosing? (laughs)

    24. SC

      I have some good news. That was something- I think one of the reasons I got into studying relationships was because I wanted that, right? So, I'm a scientist, but I also love art, and I love writing, and I love literature. I wanted to know that true love could be real, but as a scientist, uh, I am cynical, I just need some data.

    25. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    26. SC

      And

  3. 5:3712:54

    Couples therapy

    1. SC

      when- so, I practice a type of therapy called the Gottman Method, and I love that because it tends to be- well, it is one of the most evidenced-based therapies we have based on John and Julie Gottman, two psychologists who have been researching relationships for now about 50 years, and this therapy happens to be for couples. They found that you absolutely......can make longevity work in a relationship. You can build. You are not just settling for companionship, but you can have passion and intimacy, and growing love and appreciation. But there is a blueprint, a set of skills, that we were never given. We're not taught it in school. We changed the rules of the game and we haven't learned the rules yet.

    2. LF

      And, uh, the Gottman Method for couples therapy kind of gives you a few guidelines, the rules for-

    3. SC

      Right.

    4. LF

      ...longevity in a relationship.

    5. SC

      Yeah, they did a beautiful job at taking these findings they had through, you know, decades of research, quantifying it, and then s- codifying it into a therapy method. It's really skills-based. I tell couples when they're starting out with me that they're essentially gonna be starting a class.

    6. LF

      So, what's the 5:1 golden rule? What I read is there's a kind of balance you can achieve of, uh, how many interactions you have in a relationship that are positive versus negative-

    7. SC

      Mm-hmm.

    8. LF

      A- and I think that's what the 5:1 means, but basically there should be kind of an empirical... Like, if you just look back-

    9. SC

      Yeah.

    10. LF

      ...over, over a month, how many of the interactions were positive, how many were negative?

    11. SC

      Or the day.

    12. LF

      Or the day.

    13. SC

      Look at the day, right? So, the idea of this ratio, um... Well, it's not an idea. It was a finding. It is a research finding that the Gottmans got after looking at thousands of couples, um, and codifying these interactions that they were observing. Couples that tend to be satisfied in their relationships, um, that are happier, they have better health, et cetera, they are having approximately five positive interactions to each negative. And I wanna be clear about what I'm defining as positive and negative here. So, this doesn't necessarily mean that you're... These don't need to be big, sweeping, romantic gestures, buying flowers, having sex. These are things like paying attention to what we call your partner's BIDs. Um, we make these BIDs for affection, for connection all the time in our relationships, not just with our partners, but with our friends, our coworkers. And we may not even know what our style of BID is, but if you see them on a sheet, you can pretty quickly identify them. BIDs could be wanting to show your partner, tell your partner something, and have them be proud of you. It could be wanting to go buy groceries with your partner, doing things together. "Hey, you wanna come with me?" It could be telling a joke and hoping that, uh, your wife looks up from her email on the computer and acknowledges it. If she laughs, then you've got a positive, but if I don't even look up, that's a negative, right? So, it's not necessarily that I'm calling my husband an asshole. It's just, am I connecting with him? Am I meeting those BIDs for connection? And vice versa.

    14. LF

      But do those also give you a guide of how you should behave?

    15. SC

      Well, I think what's really important is actually asking your partner, or paying attention to what your partner's BIDs are, because what matters to Ty, my husband, may not matter to you. For instance, I mean, Ty's bar is so low with me, I... (laughs)

    16. LF

      (laughs)

    17. SC

      Thank God for him.

    18. LF

      In terms of what defines a positive interaction?

    19. SC

      Right. Like, he just wants me to ask him if he wants a water when I get up to get myself one.

    20. LF

      All right.

    21. SC

      Just be a basic, decent, considerate person is all he asks (laughs) of me. Whereas mine might be sort of like, stay up later with me, watch a show, um, go to bed at the same time as me, or, um, know about the people in my life. That sort of a thing.

    22. LF

      I should highlight this, and I hope- hopefully it's okay, that you were running a little bit late.

    23. SC

      (laughs)

    24. LF

      And you sent me this text, which is, which people do really rarely, and there's a subtle act of kindness within that text. So, the- the- you- the- the text you sent was that, um, I just decreased the amount of stress in your life, or something like this-

    25. SC

      You did.

    26. LF

      ...by saying it's co- it's cool. But that means that you were s- you were- you're signaling that you were stressed because you care enough to be there on time.

    27. SC

      Mm-hmm.

    28. LF

      And that was like, that made me feel really special. I was like, "Oh." You know, people don't often-

    29. SC

      You're a brilliant guy.

    30. LF

      People o- don't often- don't always do that, because that puts you also, that makes you vulnerable.

  4. 12:5420:11

    Why relationships fail

    1. LF

      What are some common ways relationships fail that you've observed in all the therapy you've done?

    2. SC

      Oh. Well, the Gottmans identified what they call the four horsemen of the apocalypse. So... (laughs)

    3. LF

      (laughs) Okay, what are the four horsemen of the apocalypse?

    4. SC

      (laughs) I mean, I could just keep it simple and go off their research. So there, those are four different behaviors that they identify in couples, or that you can identify in couples, that are really highly predictive of a divorce, some more than others. But I'll start with the lower ones. So one thing that we... Uh, by the way, actually, we all do these things.

    5. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    6. SC

      These would be in that five-to-one ratio. You'd wanna stay away from some of these. These are the ones. So as they pile up, now that ratio's gonna get imbalanced, and then you are headed for a split.

    7. LF

      Yeah.

    8. SC

      Okay? So the first is criticism. So criticism is when we have a complaint. Complaints are normal, but instead of owning our own problems, our own feelings, we assume that our perspective is com- the only valid, accurate perspective, and so we, uh, take it upon ourselves to tell our partner what is wrong with them.

    9. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    10. SC

      Okay? So there, there's essentially no real belief that they might have a valid perspective too. So, uh, this could look like, "You never help me out in that, with the house," or even, um, "You're so lazy. Can't, like, can't I just get you for five seconds to help with the kids?" Or something like that. Um, and then what happens is horseman number two, defensiveness. So, uh, not everybody is defensive just because they were criticized. Some people just are more prone to defensiveness than others. None of us really like admitting our faults, so it's pretty natural. But defensiveness is essentially making excuses, or worse, turning it around on your partner, um, not accepting any responsibility, and definitely not validating what they're feeling. Now, if you get criticized enough, or if you get really flooded ... The flooding is what happens when our heart rate goes up kind of around 100 beats per minute. Our frontal lobe shuts down. That's our thoughtful brain, our logical brain.

    11. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    12. SC

      And our reptilian kind of hindbrain takes over our thinking, and we just go into fight-or-flight, in a way. We, we just want to annihilate our partner instea- instead of say anything that would be helpful to the relationship. So if you're getting flooded, you could do a couple things. You could get super critical, you could get contemptuous, which I'll talk about in a second, it's the last horseman, or you do the third horseman, which is stonewalling. And in their research, the Gottmans found that men are actually more likely to stonewall. I also am someone who stonewalls. (laughs) But it's where you just sort of disconnect from the conversation.

    13. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    14. SC

      You shut down, you turn away. You can physically even turn away-

    15. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    16. SC

      ... kind of arms crossed, but you're just, you're shut off. And stonewalling happens usually because you get flooded. You feel like you can't win, you don't know what to do to make the situation better. It feels pretty hopeless, and talking feels unproductive. So you can see how in a typical heterosexual relationship, the gender dynamic, we know that women tend to use criticism more often, because they're the ones that typically raise issues verbally, and then if men are feeling more criticized, that they tend to stonewall. And it becomes this vicious cycle of then more criticism, but the criticism is really just a plea to be loved and get your partner to show you they care.

    17. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    18. SC

      And then the man tends to feel like he can't do anything right. "This isn't even productive. If I say anything, I'm just gonna make it worse." And they don't have any real ... You haven't given them a specific need, a solution, something they can do to shine for you, so they turn away.

    19. LF

      And where does the, uh, contempt come in?

    20. SC

      All right. So contempt is criticism on steroids. This is what John Gottman calls sulfuric acid for love. Nothing will erode a relationship quicker than contempt. Contempt is when you are looking at your partner from a superior position. So you are eye-rolling, you are name-calling. Um, there's a mockery, mocking you, even physical mockery, um, imitating them, imitating their voice. Contempt is meant to just take the legs out from your partner, make them feel pathetic, ridiculous. Um, and it b- it can be abusive. But, um, most people have engaged in contempt at some point in their relationship. Lower level would be sort of the eye-rolling, but that is the biggest predictor of a split.

    21. LF

      If you allow yourself to think, yeah, that mockery or contempt just a little bit, it's like this weird slippery slope.

    22. SC

      Sure is.

    23. LF

      And the opposite is true, where I just look at a person and think, "Wow, isn't that the most, like, wonderful creature I've ever seen in my life."

    24. SC

      (laughs) Hmm. Hmm.

    25. LF

      I just think that. And you notice-

    26. SC

      That's lovely.

    27. LF

      ... the little details about who they are.

    28. SC

      Mm-hmm.

    29. LF

      And so I just observe them the way you observe like a weird like peacock at a zoo or something like that.

    30. SC

      Intention is powerful, isn't it?

  5. 20:1125:38

    Drama in relationships

    1. SC

    2. LF

      Uh, tricky question.

    3. SC

      Sure.

    4. LF

      But, uh, in the, in the couples you've worked with, is there, like, the feminine and the masculine? Is there different dynamics that come into play, uh, like dominant/submissive? Is there, is it like a dance where it just changes from minute to minute? Is there di- is there dynamics that you observe that both limit and enable, uh, successful relationships?

    5. SC

      Yes, so there are... If we're talking about masculine/feminine, then how also are... we could get into... are we talking about actual gender, identified gender, or are we just talking about these traits? Because like I said, I stonewall, which is typically in couples, something that is more associated with straight men, um, but that's my style of coping when I get overwhelmed. Uh, that is not tied to any sort of success or non-success of a relationship. But what we do know is that gay couples, so lesbians and gay men, tend to be gentler with one another when they are having conflict discussions. I... So, that's actually been identified in the research, and it's something I've witnessed, and it's just fascinating. So, with my straight couples, I'll be going through one of these... If we're processing a conflict that occurred, I'll be going through the sheet, and it's very, very structured, because you don't want couples doing more damage when they're there with you. You want them practicing skills that protect them from criticism, that protect them from contempt. And when I'm working with a straight couple, I am like a referee, or sometimes I'll relate it to being like a ski coach and keeping people on a bunny hill, and you tell them... you let them make, like, two turns, and then you stop them-

    6. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    7. SC

      ... and you meet up again, because you don't want them to veer off. With straight couples, you are doing very short turns before you need to kinda intervene and re-scaffold. I had a lesbian couple recently, and they were so lovely with each other. They skipped, like, seven steps to the advanced final portion where they were already coming up with solutions and suggesting things that they might be able to do differently next time to make it better for their partner. They were asking each other questions about how their partner felt with no agenda, no attempt to sort of be like, "Well, do you think you're feeling that way because..." which straight couples do all the time. Um, you just see this humility and openness. It's lovely.

    8. LF

      Yeah, it's lovely. But I wonder if, uh, maybe I'm watching too many Hollywood films, if some of the drama, some of the tension is required for a passionate, lifelong romance.

    9. SC

      No, it's not, and that's great news. So, we actually know- (laughs)

    10. LF

      Yes.

    11. SC

      ... that the closer you feel to your partner, so if... I mean, you're, you've talked a lot about beauty.

    12. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    13. SC

      And you can ignite that beauty, that interest, right? So, when you're falling in love, it's usually that a person is sort of a mystery to you, and you're uncovering these layers that you find really appealing.

    14. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    15. SC

      There are continual layers that you can uncover with your partner over time. I don't think we realize that. I think we get complacent, and we think we've had every conversation imaginable. "What- what else are they gonna do to surprise me?" But we don't know the questions to be asking. One of my favorite questions... Um, I like turning these conversations kind of into a quiz, because I get bored easily. (laughs)

    16. LF

      Okay.

    17. SC

      So, you... Rather than just asking an open-ended question, um, there's a way you can do this with your partner where it's sort of like the dating game. Like, "What is my, as of yet, fondest but unrealized life dream?" And see if your partner knows. You might not even know.

    18. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    19. SC

      They might know you better than you know yourself. That in and of itself is a beautiful reminder of the relationship and how special it is. But then also, um, when they...... say it, or when you realize or have to think critically, like, "What is my husband's as of yet unrealized but fondest life dream?" And then you can talk about it, you just... I don't know. You just kind of transcend into this new area, and you feel tight again. You feel like... You feel close.

    20. LF

      Where you really talk to each other. Like, I, I've, uh-

    21. SC

      Yeah.

    22. LF

      ... I recorded and without intending to publish, uh, podcasts like this-

    23. SC

      Mm-hmm.

    24. LF

      ... with microphones, with, with, with friends, with people close to me, because it's literally that. You get to ask questions like as if it's an interview.

    25. SC

      Right.

    26. LF

      And we don't do that-

    27. SC

      That's exactly it. The way you're-

    28. LF

      ... with each other.

    29. SC

      ... talking with me-

    30. LF

      Yeah.

  6. 25:3832:03

    Success in relationships

    1. SC

    2. LF

      What, uh... I know we've said some of those things, but what's on the opposite side, what's the key to a successful relationship? What's like, what are the things you see time and time again that, to you, designate that they're on a good path?

    3. SC

      Yeah. There's a real attunement, honestly. Just it's, um, sort of an us-against-the-world feeling. Nobody... Neither partner's gonna talk shit on them, the other. Uh, there's a loyalty.

    4. LF

      Mm.

    5. SC

      Um, they handle each other and the relationship with care. You can tell that they've worked some things... Uh, I, to me, it usually indicates that these are some people who have figured, they've had to work some things out. They know that this is delicate. They know, um, you know, that y- you're on thin ice. You take a wrong step, and you can be back in a tough place in your relationship. Or you treat it with care, and it can be amazing. So, they're careful with one another. They give each other compliments. They are considerate. So, you'll see, um, you know, he'll bring the car around for her because it's raining, or, um, she'll bring him home some takeout. You know, she'll order for him, too, at the restaurant. There's just kind... They keep each other in each other's minds.

    6. LF

      But that us-against-the-world thing.

    7. SC

      Mm-hmm.

    8. LF

      That definitely is there. Like if you-

    9. SC

      100%. You've seen that, right?

    10. LF

      Yeah.

    11. SC

      Yeah.

    12. LF

      You've seen it. And you've seen it, like, um... I like it when couples have been together for a long time, and when one is talking, the other one looks at them. If you don't do that, that's not a bad sign, but it's a good sign when you do that-

    13. SC

      Yes.

    14. LF

      ... because, uh, and I think it's actually a really good, um, exercise to do-

    15. SC

      Mm-hmm.

    16. LF

      ... 'cause I, because I enjoy when I see in others. So, it's, it's, it's, um, it's a way to sh- show that you don't take them for granted-

    17. SC

      Mm-hmm.

    18. LF

      ... and that you still find them like this mysterious, wonderful-

    19. SC

      (laughs)

    20. LF

      ... creature to observe. Like, I think too often, we have that with our parents-

    21. SC

      Hmm.

    22. LF

      ... we have that with, um, people close to us. You think, "Yeah, I've heard what they're about to say. I know."

    23. SC

      Mm-hmm.

    24. LF

      "I know you can complete their sentences."

    25. SC

      Yeah, take them for granted.

    26. LF

      And then, if you, if you just look at them and say, "Wow, this is the most brilliant person-"

    27. SC

      Mm-hmm.

    28. LF

      "... I've ever seen in my life. Most, I can't..." You know, y- you just appreciate every word that comes out of them and look at them in that way, you actually begin to believe it.

    29. SC

      Yeah.

    30. LF

      And you actually begin to-

  7. 32:0340:39

    Dating

    1. SC

    2. LF

      What, what do you, uh... The early days of that, what, what do you think about the whole dating, modern dating process? How do you find a partner that you can, um, stay with for the rest of your life?

    3. SC

      So, we are absolutely doing it wrong.

    4. LF

      (laughs)

    5. SC

      And, um, but there is a way you can do it, and I am such a fan of this psychologist, Ty Tashiro. I adore him. He is brilliant. He's lovely. He's also very humble. Just a wonderful, salt-of-the-earth guy. I'm gonna tell you a very true story here.

    6. LF

      Uh-huh.

    7. SC

      Okay?

    8. LF

      Let's go.

    9. SC

      I was in a bad relationship, and I was, um, at a psychology conference with my partner at the time. Um, we were both at this conference, and we were sitting in a lecture hall, uh, there for Ty Tashiro to do his talk that day on his phenomenal research on relationship satisfaction and dating. Um, and I was sitting next to him, and we'd been, you know... It was just always unpleasant on trips. There were always fights. We're sitting there, and Ty Tashiro starts talking about his research and how he found that most people are, you know, signing this agreement, getting married, and doing it based on the love endorphins, and really only about 35% of anybody who's married is actually happy. Um, and he said, "So then," you know, and-

    10. LF

      That's a pretty low number.

    11. SC

      Exactly. But here's what I love about Ty Tashiro, is he didn't stop there. He wanted to know what those people who were happy, um, had in common, and then same thing with the people who were unhappy. He found a couple fascinating patterns. So, the couples who were happy tended to rate their partners higher in three different traits, and I love talking about this, because if you are somebody who can follow instructions, you can find this. (laughs) I mean, very easily. Um, those three traits tend to be conscientiousness. Okay? And I love the word conscientiousness, because it's not just kindness. Kindness is a good way to think of it, but you can be kind and kind of be a pushover, and that's not attractive. Conscientiousness is smart, attentive. It's somebody who reads into a text message and thinks, "Wow, she was making herself very vulnerable there." (laughs) That's conscientiousness.

    12. LF

      I like how you're just doing a compliment.

    13. SC

      No, but it's-

    14. LF

      Appreciate it. (laughs)

    15. SC

      ... it's true. It's a certain intelligence, awareness, and attunement.

    16. LF

      Yep. Yeah.

    17. SC

      And then on top of that, conscientiousness is motivated. So, you can't be on your ass all day and be conscientious, 'cause then you can't meet the needs that you anticipate about the person. So, conscientious is that guy who drives the car around in the rainstorm so his wife's hair doesn't get met. It's my husband who checks my alarm for me every morning 'cause he knows I'm terrible at time management, and he makes sure that I set it a reasonable amount of time before my first meeting-

    18. LF

      Yeah.

    19. SC

      ... and not the 20 minutes I think I need.

    20. LF

      Yeah.

    21. SC

      (laughs) Um, and then he'll come wake me up with a cup of coffee. That is ultimate conscientiousness. And it is true. I mean, l- I will tell you, as somebody who's with a conscientious partner, your love increases over time as you continue to feel grateful and admiring of that person. Um, the second one, you want somebody who is low in a big five personality trait called neuroticism. Um, you want somebody emotionally stable, in a way. Uh, now, this doesn't mean you can't have somebody who doesn't get the blues or struggle with mental health issues. Trust me. Ty is with somebody who (laughs) , you know, I get... I'm all over the place. But you want somebody who kind of owns their shit and isn't going to just be emotionally unstable all over... You know. You want somebody who is generally happy and has some life satisfaction. Um, having a partner who has serious m- not mental health issues, but unmitigated emotional distress and instability is really hard on the partner, and it's really hard on other family members, including children, if you have children. So, it's just a predictor of happiness.

    22. LF

      So, a cert- there's a certain threshold of chaos that, if you exceed it-

    23. SC

      Well said.

    24. LF

      ... it's going to be destructive to a-

    25. SC

      That is-

    26. LF

      ... long-term relationship.

    27. SC

      ... a perfect description.

    28. LF

      But then again-

    29. SC

      It's about chaos.Not the mystery, chaos you love as your-

    30. LF

      (laughs)

  8. 40:3942:32

    Sex

    1. LF

      Speaking of adventurousness, what about sex?

    2. SC

      Oh, sex is important.

    3. LF

      What role does sex play in a successful relationship?

    4. SC

      Well, it, okay, so I'm saying it's important, but I want to qualify that. Everybody has different levels of sex that are satisfying to them.

    5. LF

      Mm-hmm.

    6. SC

      Sex can definitely bond you to your partner. Orgasms are amazing. They de-stress us. They're healthy. They... I mean, you can have an orgasm and have a lower level of stress for 48 hours. I think that's pretty incredible. Um, if you have, uh, I mean, just that kind of physical contact with your partner, even a 20-second hug with your partner has similar benefits to an orgasm. You're gonna have a lower stress level. You're gonna feel immediately close to your partner. You're gonna get a rus- a rush of oxytocin, which is gonna make you feel happier, um, more grounded throughout the day. So, that's a 20-second hug. You extrapolate that to sex, and things are gonna be great.

    7. LF

      Mm-hmm. So, it's just physiological.

    8. SC

      Mm-hmm.

    9. LF

      But I wonder, there's probably metrics about how often you have sex, how that correlates to successful relationships and so on.

    10. SC

      (laughs) Well, there are, but it really has more to do... It's sort of like, remember I was talking about processing conflict, and what matters is do people feel like it's been resolved? Do they feel like there's been a repair?

    11. LF

      Yeah.

    12. SC

      Not necessarily how they go about doing it. Same with sex. Do, does each partner feel sexually satisfied? Um, so that could be once a month for one couple. It could be five times a week for another couple. It could be never for other couples, truly. Um, I mean, so sex has a ton of benefits, but its absence isn't necessarily detrimental, I guess would be the qualifier, depending on who you are.

    13. LF

      Yeah. I know couples that use sex to, f- as part of the conflict resolution process. (laughs)

    14. SC

      It's hugely effective for that-

    15. LF

      (laughs)

    16. SC

      ... if it works for both parties.

    17. LF

      Yeah, that's-

    18. SC

      All parties.

    19. LF

      Yeah, that's true.

    20. SC

      Not just both. All.

    21. LF

      That's true.

  9. 42:3251:33

    Cheating

    1. LF

      Um, what do you think about infidelity? Um, you know-What's the cause of infidelity? Why do men and women cheat?

    2. SC

      It's different for everybody, but I mean, even earlier, I was saying with adventurousness, like, if monogamy is something you're doing. Uh, I- I- I've seen in my own practice, I've seen the entire range of couples who are open about having sexual relationships with other people, um, and fine with it, couples who want to be fine with it, but find out they're not, um, uh, couples who aren't just couples, couples with multiple people, you know, multiple romantic relationships. Um, I've had couples where affairs all are tolerated and not talked about. Um, they're not enjoyed, but they are not the type of betrayal that will destroy the relationship. A sort of a understanding and keep it out of my face.

    3. LF

      So-

    4. SC

      And then also, we won't talk about it. (clears throat)

    5. LF

      So, an affair that happened without getting permission first-

    6. SC

      Mm-hmm.

    7. LF

      ... and as long as you don't talk about it-

    8. SC

      Right.

    9. LF

      ... it's not going to do a damage to the relationship.

    10. SC

      Right. But-

    11. LF

      Or significant.

    12. SC

      ... we can't even talk about it like that, right? So-

    13. LF

      Okay.

    14. SC

      ... nobody is going to admit that the affair is happening.

    15. LF

      Right.

    16. SC

      Um, there can't be any evidence of it. It's sort of a "just look the other way" type of a situation. But, uh, the partner who is not having the affair, right, they typically know. Um, they certainly know that their partner is capable of that. Um, they just kind of know, but they don't want it in their face. It would become a problem if it was in their face. Um, as long as certain needs are met and everything else is okay at home, it's just one of those things where, don't ask, don't tell.

    17. LF

      Well, that- that's an interesting point, because I've, I had a bunch of arguments with people. Uh, I tend to hang out with, especially in the tech sector, uh, people who really value, like, honesty-

    18. SC

      Mm-hmm.

    19. LF

      ... and radical honesty, and I keep arguing with people about this, because to me, it's not that simple. Like, that- that's an example right there of that honesty can be really destructive. (laughs)

    20. SC

      Mm-hmm.

    21. LF

      (laughs) Like, h- honesty is also a really complicated thing to get to the bottom of, because what is really honest?

    22. SC

      Yes.

    23. LF

      And- and-

    24. SC

      Yeah.

    25. LF

      ... you know, like, how do I look in this dress? (laughs) Like, there's a million ways-

    26. SC

      It's perspective. It's perspective.

    27. LF

      ... to answer that.

    28. SC

      Yeah.

    29. LF

      Perspec- a lot of it-

    30. SC

      It can be a cesspool in my mind, if I'm in a bad place or my partner and I haven't b- like, if Talia and I haven't been connected lately, my honesty of what I actually think about him- (laughs)

  10. 51:3353:24

    Polyamory

    1. SC

    2. LF

      Uh, what do you think about open relationships in general? My worldview is such that I see the beauty and value in monogamous relationships-

    3. SC

      Mm-hmm.

    4. LF

      ... just for me.

    5. SC

      Mm-hmm.

    6. LF

      But I don't... I'm also open to the possibility of what works for other people. Have you done any kind of work with people in open relationships?

    7. SC

      As clients or research?

    8. LF

      As cli- as clients.

    9. SC

      Oh, yeah. Yeah.

    10. LF

      Is there some interesting differences in between, uh, open relationships and monogamous relationships?

    11. SC

      You know, I think that may have been actually what was behind my question about, um, the satisfaction with them being on extremes. My hypothesis essentially was, is it because they... If you are really all in, you've worked out some of the kinks. I think I've seen, um, couples who are trying it out, right, for the first time, it tends to get a little haywire. Um, there's some excitement in the beginning, everybody's really excited about it. Um, I think the philosophy makes sense to a lot of people. Uh, the science of it makes sense to a lot of people, and... But we have been raised in a society that is pretty monogamous, so there isn't a lot of scaffolding around it, um, and, and there's a lot of con- inner conflict, I think, for people to go away from the values that they've been taught since they were kids. Um, and so jealousy arises a lot, and, uh, uh, and also I... It's very difficult to be, I think, as truthful and direct as you need to be, which you're describing in these polyamorous situations where everybody... It's laid out on the table. Um, so I think that's something that may be practiced. In my own work with clients, I've just noticed that, um, the c- the partners who are happier in these situations who I've worked with, um, they are more experienced at it.

    12. LF

      Yeah.

    13. SC

      They seem to have it down.

  11. 53:241:22:02

    Johnny Depp and Amber Heard trial

    1. SC

    2. LF

      You testified in the Johnny Depp/Amber Heard trial, uh, based on your role as a clinical and forensic psychologist. It was watched by, I don't know how many people, maybe tens, maybe hundreds of millions of people. What was that experience like?

    3. SC

      Thank God I didn't know that at the time.

    4. LF

      (laughs)

    5. SC

      Um...

    6. LF

      Were you scared?

    7. SC

      Oh, yeah.

    8. LF

      Given the size of the platform-

    9. SC

      Well-

    10. LF

      ... and how many people were watching?

    11. SC

      I'm not... Scared typically isn't the word when I testify. I'm always, um, excited and a little trepidatious before I testify, um, because the stakes are so high for everybody's life in that room. Um, this was different. I te- I... Anxiety isn't usually my brand, um-

    12. LF

      (laughs)

    13. SC

      ... and I just skipped anxiety that morning and went straight to terror.

    14. LF

      Yeah. (laughs)

    15. SC

      And I was mad. I was mad at the legal t-... I was funny... Like, I was having all these strong emotions. I couldn't find my bobby pins. I almost started crying because I couldn't find them. Uh, I was pretty unhinged that morning, and in a way that was really unfamiliar to me. Um, and it was right when I cried 'cause I couldn't find my bobby pins that I realized I needed to get a grip, and that I was a professional, and that my hair didn't matter, even though it ended up mattering. People noticed that it was crazy. Um, but I got a grip, and I went in, and I just did my job.

    16. LF

      So, the terror, in the end, helped you focus and do your job well?

    17. SC

      I think it does, and it's a little scary though, because I know what fear does cognitively, (laughs) and there is a sweet spot where you want some stress, and then you can be really acutely focused and attuned. But then, if you go over this threshold, you get sort of that frontal lobe shutdown where you're not thinking clearly, and everybody knows that experience from taking a really stressful test at some point, like in high school, and then they're going over the answers with the teacher in class later, and they're like, "How did I miss that question? I know that."... they, you're just in a different state. That's when you have too much stress. I think this day, I actually was bordering (laughs) on too much stress, if not clearly in that threshold. But, um, once you're sitting there for a little bit and you're asked the questions, you can kind of go into a routine of just wanting to talk about your work.

    18. LF

      So, what is the work, the job of a forensic psychologist in that context?

    19. SC

      In the Depp-Heard trial, I was, um, serving as an expert witness based on a psychological evaluation of one of the parties. Um, so forensic psychologists can serve, uh, the court or in legal matters in a number of ways. They can act as a confidential consultant for an attorney on a case, um, or they can e- even assist with jury selection. They might testify without doing an evaluation if they're just coming in to testify about sort of a subject matter. Um, and then they wouldn't be answering specific questions to either of the parties, but just talking more hypothetically about an, a field area. Um, in this case, because I was, um, ordered to conduct an evaluation, I evaluated one of the parties, and then you provide a report to the court, um, with your findings, and then you testify, um, as to what your findings were.

    20. LF

      But from my perspective, just watching you, you seem to have held it together really well. So w- what do you attribute that to? So you said, like, it calmed down after you were able to a- ask the questions.

    21. SC

      Mm-hmm.

    22. LF

      So to me, if I were just to put myself in your s- place, it seems like the internet and the world would be very nitpicky about individual words.

    23. SC

      Mm-hmm.

    24. LF

      You're speaking from a place of, um, scientific rigor.

    25. SC

      Mm-hmm.

    26. LF

      And so you have to be very precise with your wording.

    27. SC

      Very precise.

    28. LF

      I would feel, like, so much pressure about th- each single word I choose.

    29. SC

      Mm-hmm.

    30. LF

      Did you feel that pressure that you had to be extremely precise with the words?

  12. 1:22:021:32:12

    Forensic psychology

    1. SC

    2. LF

      Okay, so given how huge this trial was, given how eloquent you were, you were... I know you don't think of it that way-

    3. SC

      (laughing)

    4. LF

      ... but from a public perspective, you were, like, the star because of how well you did.

    5. SC

      That's insane.

    6. LF

      It's, uh, I mean, you know, uh...

    7. SC

      I'm pretty sure Camille's the star.

    8. LF

      Camille is also incredible. I've gotten a chance to interact with her. She's somebody that, uh, really inspires me by how good she is at her job, how much she loves her job, and how much the fame, the money, whatever, has not affected the basic core integrity of who she is-

    9. SC

      Right.

    10. LF

      ... uh, as a human being, so she's also, uh, she's also incredible. Okay, uh, how... W- what's the, what's the takeaway for you personally from the trial? Uh, how has it made you a better person? How has it changed in, changed or solidified who you are as a psychologist, as a forensic psychologist, clinical psychologist and so on?

    11. SC

      Wow. Uh, I mean, a lot happened in my life around that trial, leading up to the trial, after the trial, um... So, let's tackle forensic psychologist first.

    12. LF

      Sure.

    13. SC

      Okay. So, in terms of forensic psychology, um, I am grateful to that trial for really strengthening my abilities. Um, the stakes were so high that I took... You know, I was retained about two years prior to the trial, so I really delved deep into the academic side of forensic psychology and making sure that, um, I was adhering as closely as possible to standard practices, best practice recommendations for this specific type of an examination. It was intellectually awesome and challenging. I felt like my brain was on fire for a full year leading up to the trial, and that can be really, really fun. It was just challenging, but I am really proud of the work I did. I think the stakes were really high. It's serious work. It's, um, important that it's done well and accurately, and I felt really good about it.

Episode duration: 1:46:42

Install uListen for AI-powered chat & search across the full episode — Get Full Transcript

Transcript of episode qtOKrG_wK5A

Get more out of YouTube videos.

High quality summaries for YouTube videos. Accurate transcripts to search & find moments. Powered by ChatGPT & Claude AI.

Add to Chrome