Modern WisdomIs It Ethical To Hand-Pick Your Child’s Genes? - Dr Jonathan Anomaly
At a glance
WHAT IT’S REALLY ABOUT
Designing Future Minds: Ethics, IQ, and Embryo Gene Selection Debated
- Chris Williamson and Dr. Jonathan Anomaly discuss the science, politics, and ethics of intelligence, genetics, and emerging reproductive technologies. They trace why IQ became taboo after World War II, despite strong evidence that it is heritable and predictive of life outcomes like education, income, and crime. The conversation then explores polygenic embryo selection for health, intelligence, and personality, weighing potential benefits against risks like arms races, inequality, and value-laden trait choices. They conclude that genetic selection is inevitable, likely to be normalized and subsidized, and that denying genetic reality may ultimately harm the very groups egalitarian ideologies aim to protect.
IDEAS WORTH REMEMBERING
5 ideasIQ is both real and politically loaded, but ignoring it is dangerous.
Modern IQ tests are reasonably valid and predictive (education, income, marital stability, crime) and strongly heritable, yet post-war revulsion toward eugenics led elites to stigmatize any genetic explanation of group or individual differences. Anomaly argues that denying IQ’s reality fuels envy-based politics and misguided policies that punish high contributors under the guise of rectifying “privilege.”
Polygenic embryo selection for health is already here and intelligence is next.
Current IVF clinics can screen embryos for polygenic risks like diabetes, heart disease, and schizophrenia, and at least one company Anomaly advises can select for higher predicted cognitive ability, with 20–25 IQ point spreads possible across a batch of embryos. He expects companies and governments (e.g., Israel, China) to expand and subsidize this, making selection for health and cognition increasingly common.
The disease–enhancement line feels intuitive but is conceptually weak.
People draw a moral line between preventing disease (e.g., avoiding Tay-Sachs, cancer risk) and enhancing traits (height, IQ, longevity), yet Anomaly argues many “enhancements” (braces, glasses, muscle preservation) simply counter natural decline or mutation load. In practice, the same logic that justifies disease prevention often supports selecting for traits that robustly contribute to a wider range of good lives.
Modern medicine increases genetic load, creating a case for voluntary genetic selection.
By keeping more people alive and reproductive despite serious genetic disadvantages (poor eyesight, childhood cancers, monogenic diseases), advanced healthcare allows deleterious mutations to accumulate. Anomaly uses a “Chesterton’s Post” metaphor: if you want to keep today’s functional baseline, you must actively counter entropy—via embryo selection or gene editing—rather than pretending evolution has stopped.
Genetic selection can create collective goods but also arms races.
Selecting for intelligence or lower disease burden likely yields positive externalities—more innovation, productivity, and cooperation over longer time horizons. But some traits (e.g., extreme height or pure status traits) risk zero-sum arms races where everyone pays costs without net societal gain, though Anomaly expects many such races (like excessive height) to be self-limiting because of health and mating trade-offs.
WORDS WORTH SAVING
5 quotes“Blank slatists in the streets, hereditarian between the sheets.”
— Jonathan Anomaly
“If you leave a thing alone, you leave it to a torrent of change… If you want the old white post, you must have a new white post.”
— Jonathan Anomaly (quoting and extending G.K. Chesterton
“There are actually moral risks to denying IQ and its importance in everyday life, because if you don’t understand that this is a real phenomenon… you’re going to create social policies that basically say, ‘Let’s punish the high IQ people and reward the others.’”
— Jonathan Anomaly
“We’re already eugenicists in some form because why did you pick your partner? … We’ve been there since the beginning of time since reproduction through sex started.”
— Chris Williamson
“The ultimate collective action problem across societies, across countries, and across generations is genetic selection. What happens when everyone has the ability to select embryos or edit those embryos?”
— Jonathan Anomaly
High quality AI-generated summary created from speaker-labeled transcript.
Get more out of YouTube videos.
High quality summaries for YouTube videos. Accurate transcripts to search & find moments. Powered by ChatGPT & Claude AI.
Add to Chrome