Skip to content
Modern WisdomModern Wisdom

Is It Ethical To Hand-Pick Your Child’s Genes? - Dr Jonathan Anomaly

Dr Jonathan Anomaly is a philosopher, professor and an author. The concept of hand-selecting your baby's traits has been an idea since the dawn of genetic science. This technology is now available. But just how ethical is it to shape your child's destiny, and what unseen problems might a world with this science be facing? Expect to learn why so many people dislike any discussions about IQ, what the moral challenges of embryo selection are, why genetic selection is going to be the biggest global talking point over the next decade, whether you are able to fix evolutionary mismatch with embryo selection, Jonny's prediction for the future of multiculturalism and much more... - 00:00 Why IQ Annoys People 03:56 Is IQ a Reliable Measurement? 09:48 Risks of Making Some People More Valuable 15:39 Will Embryo Selection Be the Next Big Thing? 20:27 Humans Are Already Selecting Traits in Partners 27:51 Moral Challenges of Genetic Enhancement 33:44 Are Our Genes Mutating & Eroding? 40:48 Will This Help the Declining Birth Rate? 48:56 Should We Be Worried About Embryo Selection? 56:45 What Genetics Tells Us About Morals 1:04:53 The Genetics of Collaboration 1:10:08 Ethical Arguments for Genetic Enhancement 1:18:13 The Olympic Female Boxing Situation 1:26:46 New Developments of Polygenic Risk Scores 1:36:18 Predicted Uptake of Embryo Selection 1:39:46 Different Consequences of Increased Selection 1:45:27 Where to Find Jonathan - Get access to every episode 10 hours before YouTube by subscribing for free on Spotify - https://spoti.fi/2LSimPn or Apple Podcasts - https://apple.co/2MNqIgw Get my free Reading List of 100 life-changing books here - https://chriswillx.com/books/ Try my productivity energy drink Neutonic here - https://neutonic.com/modernwisdom - Get in touch in the comments below or head to... Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/chriswillx Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/chriswillx Email: https://chriswillx.com/contact/

Chris WilliamsonhostDr Jonathan Anomalyguest
Aug 10, 20241h 47mWatch on YouTube ↗

At a glance

WHAT IT’S REALLY ABOUT

Designing Future Minds: Ethics, IQ, and Embryo Gene Selection Debated

  1. Chris Williamson and Dr. Jonathan Anomaly discuss the science, politics, and ethics of intelligence, genetics, and emerging reproductive technologies. They trace why IQ became taboo after World War II, despite strong evidence that it is heritable and predictive of life outcomes like education, income, and crime. The conversation then explores polygenic embryo selection for health, intelligence, and personality, weighing potential benefits against risks like arms races, inequality, and value-laden trait choices. They conclude that genetic selection is inevitable, likely to be normalized and subsidized, and that denying genetic reality may ultimately harm the very groups egalitarian ideologies aim to protect.

IDEAS WORTH REMEMBERING

5 ideas

IQ is both real and politically loaded, but ignoring it is dangerous.

Modern IQ tests are reasonably valid and predictive (education, income, marital stability, crime) and strongly heritable, yet post-war revulsion toward eugenics led elites to stigmatize any genetic explanation of group or individual differences. Anomaly argues that denying IQ’s reality fuels envy-based politics and misguided policies that punish high contributors under the guise of rectifying “privilege.”

Polygenic embryo selection for health is already here and intelligence is next.

Current IVF clinics can screen embryos for polygenic risks like diabetes, heart disease, and schizophrenia, and at least one company Anomaly advises can select for higher predicted cognitive ability, with 20–25 IQ point spreads possible across a batch of embryos. He expects companies and governments (e.g., Israel, China) to expand and subsidize this, making selection for health and cognition increasingly common.

The disease–enhancement line feels intuitive but is conceptually weak.

People draw a moral line between preventing disease (e.g., avoiding Tay-Sachs, cancer risk) and enhancing traits (height, IQ, longevity), yet Anomaly argues many “enhancements” (braces, glasses, muscle preservation) simply counter natural decline or mutation load. In practice, the same logic that justifies disease prevention often supports selecting for traits that robustly contribute to a wider range of good lives.

Modern medicine increases genetic load, creating a case for voluntary genetic selection.

By keeping more people alive and reproductive despite serious genetic disadvantages (poor eyesight, childhood cancers, monogenic diseases), advanced healthcare allows deleterious mutations to accumulate. Anomaly uses a “Chesterton’s Post” metaphor: if you want to keep today’s functional baseline, you must actively counter entropy—via embryo selection or gene editing—rather than pretending evolution has stopped.

Genetic selection can create collective goods but also arms races.

Selecting for intelligence or lower disease burden likely yields positive externalities—more innovation, productivity, and cooperation over longer time horizons. But some traits (e.g., extreme height or pure status traits) risk zero-sum arms races where everyone pays costs without net societal gain, though Anomaly expects many such races (like excessive height) to be self-limiting because of health and mating trade-offs.

WORDS WORTH SAVING

5 quotes

“Blank slatists in the streets, hereditarian between the sheets.”

Jonathan Anomaly

“If you leave a thing alone, you leave it to a torrent of change… If you want the old white post, you must have a new white post.”

Jonathan Anomaly (quoting and extending G.K. Chesterton

“There are actually moral risks to denying IQ and its importance in everyday life, because if you don’t understand that this is a real phenomenon… you’re going to create social policies that basically say, ‘Let’s punish the high IQ people and reward the others.’”

Jonathan Anomaly

“We’re already eugenicists in some form because why did you pick your partner? … We’ve been there since the beginning of time since reproduction through sex started.”

Chris Williamson

“The ultimate collective action problem across societies, across countries, and across generations is genetic selection. What happens when everyone has the ability to select embryos or edit those embryos?”

Jonathan Anomaly

Historical stigma around IQ, eugenics, and post–World War II normsValidity, limits, and social correlates of IQ and general intelligence (g)Polygenic embryo screening and selection for health and cognitive traitsEthical debates: disease prevention vs enhancement, consent, fairness, and envyGenetic load, mutation accumulation, and the case for "voluntary eugenics"Social and political implications: inequality, sex ratios, religiosity, ideologyMoral enhancement, cooperation, and the interaction of IQ with pro-social behavior

High quality AI-generated summary created from speaker-labeled transcript.

Get more out of YouTube videos.

High quality summaries for YouTube videos. Accurate transcripts to search & find moments. Powered by ChatGPT & Claude AI.

Add to Chrome