Skip to content
Modern WisdomModern Wisdom

What Embryo Selection Means for Humanity - Dr Jonathan Anomaly

Dr Jonathan Anomaly is a philosopher, professor and an author. What if you could design your own “super baby”? Imagine erasing genetic diseases, removing inherited conditions, and even selecting traits for beauty or intelligence. How close are we to making this possible, and what unintended consequences could this unleash? Expect to learn why embryo selection will be the next frontier of fertility planning, why screening for traits beyond disease is a slippery slope toward eugenics, what the moral, ethical and realistic arguments are for embryo selection and how big of a societal gap this will create, if you can return the super baby if it didn’t yield desired results, if there were regulations in this space, what red lines would be drawn and what would be left to the market and much more… - 0:00 When Does Health Screening Turn Into Human Engineering? 7:08 Does Embyro Selection Risk Deepening Inequality? 14:30 How Can We Soften the Conversation on Genetic Selection? 21:13 Inside Herasight: The Algorithm Powering Polygenic Selection 26:56 Should Parents Drive Embryo Selection During IVF? 33:09 How Can We Tell If Genetic Screening Companies Actually Know What They’re Doing? 46:45 Does Herasight’s Algorithm Work? 51:38 Is Buyer’s Remorse a Risk of Embryo Selection? 01:01:20 Where Do We Draw the Line with Trait Selection? 01:05:15 Could Genetic Selection Lead to Wrongful Life Lawsuits? 01:13:07 How Genetic Selection Impacts Personhood and Identity 01:25:36 Are Genetics Blueprints of Our Lives? 01:36:57 Does Embryo Screening Increase Stigma? 01:45:22 Will Embryo Selection Become a Marketing Race? 01:53:15 What Does the Next Five Years Look Like? 01:58:29 Where to Find Jonathan - Check out Herasight: ⁠https://www.herasight.com/⁠ Get access to every episode 10 hours before YouTube by subscribing for free on Spotify - https://spoti.fi/2LSimPn or Apple Podcasts - https://apple.co/2MNqIgw Get my free Reading List of 100 life-changing books here - https://chriswillx.com/books/ Try my productivity energy drink Neutonic here - https://neutonic.com/modernwisdom - Get in touch in the comments below or head to... Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/chriswillx Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/chriswillx Email: https://chriswillx.com/contact/

Chris WilliamsonhostJonathan Anomalyguest
Nov 8, 20251h 59mWatch on YouTube ↗

At a glance

WHAT IT’S REALLY ABOUT

Embryo Selection, Genetics, And The Future Of Human Reproduction Explained

  1. Chris Williamson and Dr. Jonathan Anomaly discuss embryo selection using polygenic risk scores, clarifying how it differs from gene editing and traditional IVF embryo grading. They explore public fears around 'eugenics', the ethics of selecting for disease vs. intelligence, and how World War II taboos still shape Western attitudes to genetics. Anomaly explains the science and validation of polygenic scores, his company HeraCyte’s approach to democratizing the technology, and concerns about inequality, government coercion, and professional gatekeeping by doctors and regulators. The conversation also tackles deeper issues of personhood, determinism, parental guilt, social norms, and how different cultures and countries are likely to adopt or resist these technologies.

IDEAS WORTH REMEMBERING

5 ideas

Embryo selection reveals existing genetic variation; it does not edit genes.

Anomaly stresses that HeraCyte’s process only scores and compares embryos already created during IVF, akin to replacing a doctor’s eyeballing of morphology with far richer genetic information, not adding or changing DNA.

Most people already accept genetic screening for disease, but balk at intelligence.

Survey data show ~70–75% of Americans support screening for disease versus ~40% for intelligence, reflecting deep moral taboos around mental traits and perceived judgments about person-worth, especially in Western post-war cultures.

All medicine is probabilistic, and polygenic scores are just another probability tool.

Doctors already make risk-based decisions on incomplete information; polygenic scores formalize and quantify genetic risk (e.g., for schizophrenia or diabetes) and can be validated by seeing how well they predict differences between adult siblings.

Good polygenic prediction must be transparently validated and ancestry-aware.

Anomaly argues any serious company should show how its scores are derived, how much variance they explain, and how accuracy changes across ancestries; otherwise patients risk making life-shaping decisions on “astrology-level” data.

Selecting against one disease often reduces several others due to shared genetics.

Their pleiotropy analysis suggests most genetic overlaps between traits are positive: e.g., lowering risk for severe depression may also lower risks for bipolar and schizophrenia, and selecting for higher intelligence correlates with broadly better health outcomes.

WORDS WORTH SAVING

5 quotes

What we’re doing is revealing more information about the natural genetic variation that exists in your embryos and letting you choose which one to implant.

Dr. Jonathan Anomaly

Most people don’t think that someone who is healthier is morally superior to someone who’s less healthy.

Dr. Jonathan Anomaly

All of medicine is probabilistic, and indeed all of life is.

Dr. Jonathan Anomaly

Either you think that God is creating this condition where your body is just constantly aborting embryos, and that’s okay, but what God is not doing is allowing you to do the same thing before it’s even implanted.

Dr. Jonathan Anomaly

We’re replacing chance with choice to some extent, and that’s not necessarily a bad thing.

Dr. Jonathan Anomaly

Difference between embryo selection, IVF screening, and gene editingPublic fears, eugenics history, and post–World War II genetic taboosEthics of selecting against disease versus selecting for traits like intelligencePolygenic risk scores: how they’re built, validated, and their limitationsInequality, access, regulation, and the risk of government coercionPersonhood, the non-identity problem, and parental/child ‘remorse’Cultural and geopolitical variation in attitudes toward genetic selection

High quality AI-generated summary created from speaker-labeled transcript.

Get more out of YouTube videos.

High quality summaries for YouTube videos. Accurate transcripts to search & find moments. Powered by ChatGPT & Claude AI.

Add to Chrome