Skip to content
PivotPivot

Scott Galloway Predicts a $10 Trillion Market Wipeout | Pivot

Kara and Scott break down how the Iran war is rattling oil and global markets, Anthropic suing the Pentagon, and a damning report that most major chatbots will help plan violent attacks. Then, Grammarly impersonates Kara Swisher, Barry Diller wants CNN, and Scott predicts the market could be headed for a wipeout. #pivot #podcast #karaswisher #scottgalloway #iran #oil #anthropic #chatbots #grammarly #ai #barrydiller #cnn #stockmarket 00:00 Intro 01:02 Iran War Oil Shock 20:01 Anthropic Sues Pentagon 29:29 Grammarly’s “Expert Review” 34:48 Chatbots Help Plan Violent Attacks 47:31 Barry Diller’s CNN Vision 57:30 Predictions Producers: Lara Naaman Zoë Marcus Taylor Griffin Video Producer: Manolo Moreno Vox Media's Executive Producer of Podcasts: Nishat Kurwa Subscribe to Pivot on Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/pivot/id1073226719 Subscribe to Pivot on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4MU3RFGELZxPT9XHVwTNPR Follow us on Instagram and Threads at: https://www.instagram.com/pivotpodcastofficial/ Follow us on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@PIVOTPODCAST Send us your questions by calling us at 855-51-PIVOT, or email pivot@voxmedia.com

Scott GallowayhostKara Swisherhost
Mar 13, 20261h 5mWatch on YouTube ↗

EVERY SPOKEN WORD

  1. 0:001:02

    Intro

    1. SG

      This isn't military action, this is a war. There is going to be-

    2. KS

      It's an excursion, the word he's using now. It's an excursion.

    3. SG

      Like a field trip?

    4. KS

      [upbeat music] Hi, everyone, this is Pivot from New York Magazine and the Vox Media Podcast Network. I'm Kara Swisher.

    5. SG

      And I'm Scott Galloway.

    6. KS

      Scott, did we have a good time in Minneapolis?

    7. SG

      Oh, that was wonderful, and thank you to the, the wonderful people of Minneapolis. I thought it was great. Uh, I, I've never... It, you know what was really in- The, the community or, um, you know, maybe we got a, a not a representative sample. I'd like to think we got a representative-

    8. KS

      We did

    9. SG

      ... the community seems very unified right now.

    10. KS

      Yeah, absolutely. People drove from North Dakota. There was-

    11. SG

      Yeah

    12. KS

      ... somebody from Iowa.

    13. SG

      Duluth, wherever that is, or Iowa.

    14. KS

      Yeah. Yeah.

    15. SG

      We had a lawyer from Iowa come.

    16. KS

      Yeah. Yep. Judge.

    17. SG

      By the way, shout out. We know who you are. There's this wonderful woman who's a lawyer in family court.

    18. KS

      Yeah.

    19. SG

      She commutes seven hours a week, and she said that-

    20. KS

      Judge

    21. SG

      ... uh, excuse me, she a judge, yeah. And she said we're her, we're her best friends.

    22. KS

      Yeah. Yeah, it was great, and people were great. Anyway, we've got a lot

  2. 1:0220:01

    Iran War Oil Shock

    1. KS

      to get to today. I'm gonna dig in. First, the war in Iran is sending oil prices on a wild ride this week and creating what the International Energy Agency says is, quote, "The largest supply disruption in the history of the [laughs] global oil market." Okay, that's kind of something.

    2. SG

      There we go.

    3. KS

      As of this recording, oil is still very high, slowly coming down from over $100 a barrel after ships were attacked in the Persian Bal- Gulf. There's also s- attacks still going on. Gulf pr- uh, gas prices continue to climb as well, and just remember, it's not just gas prices. Every price goes up when gas goes up. The IEA's 32 member countries are releasing a record 400 million barrels of oil from strategic reserves to counter the chaos, which means we aren't gonna feel this yet. Uh, I interviewed, uh, Senator Warner yesterday, and he was noting that. Um, Trump has tried to calm markets. He keeps trying to, to do this, to bring these oil prices down by words, saying the war is, quote, "Very complete," only to later announce, "We haven't won enough." Oil prices also plunged after Energy Secretary Chris Wright incorrectly posted that US Navy had escorted a tanker through the Strait of Hormuz, so that was a problem. The post was deleted within minutes. Was enough to move markets and wipe out m- uh, million, billion, million dollar trades. Um, this is such a taco. This is the greatest taco of all, I think. And even if the war in Iran ends soon, returning the Strait of Hormuz to typical traffic could take one to three months. We're gonna see reverberations of this ridiculous situation, um, the way he's handling it and the way he's not... It seems all over the place. Um, and also to, to add to the, this kind of mess there, the initial findings of a military investigation say that US was responsible for that deadly Tomahawk missile strike on the Iranian elementary school. It's actually causing a lot of strife within MAGA, by the way. The report notes officers li- and everywhere else, n- normal people and MAGA. Um, the report notes officers likely used outdated information to label the school as a military target. Trump has tried to put the blame on Iran earlier this week, claiming they also have Tomahawks, which everyone thought was ridiculous. And when asked about the military report on Wednesday, Trump said he knew nothing about it. Um, we'll get to the, the photography scandal at the Pentagon, but talk a little bit about what's going on with oil prices and this, this school, which is just... I feel like we should take responsibility when we make an error, such a terrible error. But go ahead. Start, just go ahead.

    4. SG

      Well, I'll go in re- I'll go in reverse order. When you're handling a crisis, and this is a crisis-

    5. KS

      Yeah

    6. SG

      ... the death of civilians, especially children, is obviously pretty ugly. You acknowledge the issue, you take responsibility, and you try and over-correct, and they've done nothing of the sort. And there is i- in a war, and this is a war, this isn't military action, this is a war. There is going to be-

    7. KS

      It's an excursion, the word he's using now. It's an excursion.

    8. SG

      [sighs] Whatever that means, an excursion. God, like a f-

    9. KS

      I went on a bike excursion.

    10. SG

      Like a field trip? Like we have to-

    11. KS

      Yeah, exactly. [laughs] My daughter went on an excursion to a theater.

    12. SG

      Except he didn't get Congress's approval the day before-

    13. KS

      Yeah

    14. SG

      ... that, that he could go on the excursion. Um-

    15. KS

      Yeah

    16. SG

      ... you know, it's a tragedy. Uh, they just made a bad situation worse. First off, they look incompetent by saying that it might have been a Tomahawk from Iran. Iran doesn't have Tomahawks. So i-i-it looks like, okay, I'm not willing to own up to this. I mean, there's not a good answer, but there's a reasonable answer here, and that is-

    17. KS

      We're sorry

    18. SG

      ... you know, the, the... [sighs] Yeah, this... We decided to go on f- you know, with military action. This is a, this is a group of people who killed 30,000 of its own people. W- war is going to have collateral damage. We screwed up. We take responsibility. These are the following steps we're putting in place to make sure it doesn't happen again. And take responsibility for it.

    19. KS

      Mm-hmm.

    20. SG

      And it would've been not over, but it would've-

    21. KS

      Right

    22. SG

      ... been acceptable. Instead, it's like, no, it was Iran's fault?

    23. KS

      Yeah.

    24. SG

      Uh, it just doesn't-

    25. KS

      Or I didn't know.

    26. SG

      Yeah. Or, oh, uh, is this-

    27. KS

      PEGSS was the same way. It was, it was... And was angry when people asked about it, which is, uh, the, everything wrong in the response and everything wrong in the mistake, but you're right, absolutely.

    28. SG

      Yeah, and the, the real... I mean, we're just, we're just starting to see... [sighs] So I was speaking to a kid and, um, and I said, "What, what... You know, where do you wanna be in five years?" I always ask young men that. "Where do you wanna be in five years?" And this kid said, uh, "I'd really love to have my own auto repair shop focusing on EVs."

    29. KS

      Mm-hmm.

    30. SG

      I said, "Okay, well then let's reverse engineer from those things. Like, what kind of skills do you need to acquire? What kind of job certification? What kind of capital or money would you need to, um, uh, start something like this?"

  3. 20:0129:29

    Anthropic Sues Pentagon

    1. KS

      order to formally ban Anthropic across the federal government, which is likely illegal. The Defense Department CTO, Emil Michael, and let me just say I covered him, and he's a, a toadying bully, just said on CNBC that Anthropic would, quote, "pollute the agency's supply chain." We've only done this for foreign companies, just so you know, this kind of behavior. All this comes as Anthropic is officially suing the Pentagon for labeling it a supply chain risk, effectively blacklisting the company from federal contracts. This has never been done to an American company. Uh, Anthropic argues the government overstepped its authority and violated the company's First Amendment rights, and now Microsoft is getting in the mix. The company threw its support behind Anthropic this week, urging the federal court to temporarily block the Pentagon's supply risk designation in an amicus brief. Uh, Microsoft warned, uh, that, uh, the unprecedented m-move would have, quote, "broad negative ramifications for the US tech industry," and they're damn right. Scott, before we go further, I want to play a prediction you made last week. Let's listen.

    2. SG

      My prediction is no, and that is Dario Amodei has given license and permission to CEOs to say no. And in the next thirty days, you are going to see a raft of CEOs find their testicles and start saying no to this administration.

    3. KS

      So you were right, Scott. Uh, so let's talk about that, them saying no. And it's not just Microsoft. Thirty-seven AI researchers at OpenAI and Google, not the companies themselves, also filed a brief supporting Anthropic. Um, you know, I-I'm gonna just very quickly comment. The, the-- This-- What the government's doing here is really u-unprecedented. It's a disagreement with a company, and instead of just disagreeing and moving on, they are attacking them in the most ridiculous of ways, trying to make an example of Anthropic and really hurt their business. I need you all to understand Emil Michael's role here because th-th-these people all have other interests and agendas that have to do with their previous life in Silicon Valley and their future life in Silicon Valley. And Emil Michael's always, as I said, been a toadying bully to powerful men, and this is what he's doing here. Um, and he's not a, he is not a, um, a player that is in any way, um, uh, you know, sort of n-neutral. He's not doing things for you and I in, in this government. He's doing things in his own self-interest, if-- would be my guess. And so the, the attacks on Anthropic, right behind him is all manner of competitors of Anthropic that are using the federal government to, uh, hurt a company that decided not to want to do something, and I'm glad Microsoft, uh, stood up for them. Scott?

    4. SG

      I think this is the biggest story in tech. And so just a quick, a quick recap. Um, Anthropic had basically two asks of the Pentagon, um, and both pretty narrow. They didn't want, uh, Claude to be used for fully autonomous weapons, meaning AI, not humans, making final lethal, uh, targeting decisions, which seems reasonable. And the second one was no use of Claude for mass domestic surveillance of Americans. And the Pentagon responded that it does not intend to use Claude for those purposes but refused to contractually commit to that, arguing that it, it can't lead tactical operations by exception and that legality is the Pentagon's responsibility. A-and then on the-- Uh, about two and a half weeks ago, Trump posted on Truth Social, directing every federal agency, directing every federal agency to immediately cease all use of Anthropic's technology. And then Hegseth designated Anthropic as a supply chain risk. Okay, that is-- Th-that's a label which was, which has been reserved for foreign adversaries-

    5. KS

      Yeah, I just said that. Yeah

    6. SG

      ... a-and companies linked to the Chinese and Russian government. Well, I'm saying it again, Kara.

    7. KS

      All right. Okay, fine. [chuckles] You just repeated what I just said.

    8. SG

      Uh, the supply chain, the supply chain risk status, i-it-- First off, that's-- This isn't just the government saying, "Okay, y-you don't wanna work with us, we don't wanna work with you."

    9. KS

      Mm-hmm.

    10. SG

      If they say-- If they label them as a supply chain risk, then already, uh, a hundred plus enterprise companies have reached out to Anthropic and said, "We may not be able to use you." A financial services company pauses negotiations regarding a fifty million dollar contract. A pharmaceutical firm, financial technology company, I mean, they can't... This really is an ex... When you're labeled sort of an enemy of state, this is equivalent of like you're a corporate enemy of state or threat. I'd say threat.Anthropic has now filed a lawsuit against the Pentagon saying that Congress's procurement laws don't authorize blacklisting a US company over protected speech. That's what this is. They get, they get to work with or not work with who they want, and the supply chain designation is, is just not, it's just not legal, and it sets a dangerous precedent for any American company.

    11. KS

      They will lose. Pe- most people feel that-

    12. SG

      The government will lose, I think

    13. KS

      ... but it will have an effect. Yes. Yes. The government will lose, but it'll still have the effect. This is a Trump thing. He creates a real problem, whether it's Anthropic or-

    14. SG

      Yeah, and companies won't work with them until they figure it out

    15. KS

      ... and then, and then it causes damage, just like-

    16. SG

      Right

    17. KS

      ... they've done at, you know, when they fire all of Voice of America. Now they've lost in court, and Kerry Lake is an idiot, but it's already caused damage and caused damage to it, and that's the goal, is they're gonna push it legally as far as they can, and then they'll be stopped. But by the time they're stopped, Anthropic is badly affected. And if you all don't think this is a Silicon Valley rumble happening here, it's all in the self-interest of private companies who have an interest in slowing Anthropic down. And if you look at the links between Emil Michael and the rest of these, these, these clowns-

    18. SG

      So they have financial interest in competitors?

    19. KS

      Just there's... Yes, they do. And so this is a way that Silicon Valley, the penny-- Silicon Valley used to ignore government for the most part, and then the penny dropped that they're easy to pay for and that they can do their competition with each other in the federal government by pretending they're working for us as people or getting spots, putting their, putting their people in the various spots, right? That will cause it. This is a Silicon Valley corporate beef happening. It's-- That is what's occurring here. And-

    20. SG

      The one that's been most outspoken, and I'm trying to connect his financial interest, which I'm sure is driving his rhetoric, is David Sacks.

    21. KS

      David Sacks, Marc Andreessen. Please understand there are shadow people behind these actions that you need to pay attention to, and Trump is a, you know, sort of a useful idiot. I'm, I'm sure they make fun of Trump behind his back. Um, but, you know, it's all in their economic self-interest to hurt this company. And they couldn't hurt them by being better, so this is how they're doing it. This is what they're doing. It's really-

    22. SG

      But it comes down... Th-this is the, this is the fulcrum that determines if companies continue to show some backbone. And by the way, good for Satya Nadella, um, showing some backbone here at, at again, risk. So the, the Kalshi is saying that Anthropic's li- the likelihood Anthropic wins the case is seventy-two percent. In the meantime, companies will say, "Hey, that site license we were about to sign with you, Anthropic, we're just gonna wait. We're apologize. This is terrible."

    23. KS

      "We love you. We think your technology's great."

    24. SG

      "You're great, but we can't-"

    25. KS

      Yep.

    26. SG

      "We, we, we can't sign this contract right now." To, to your point, Microsoft and a group of twenty-two retired senior military officers have filed amicusus, amicus briefs in support of Anthropic and its lawsuit. But what's interesting is that consumers are speaking. The enterprise is running, but consumers are running towards Anthropic. Downloads of the Claude app spiked more than seventy-five percent after Trump prompted federal agencies to stop using Anthropic. And on the flip side, uninstalls of ChatGPT, uh, ChatGPT's mobile app spiked roughly three hundred percent the day after Trump's proclamation. So the, the, the question is, who wins in the mind of Anthropic's board here? The fear and the stasis that has been created in the enterprise market, or consumers running towards a company they think is finally showing some backbone?

    27. KS

      I think it's damaging. I think this is the t- this is such a Trump way to do this, is create-

    28. SG

      Well, Anthropic's more enterprise, unfortunately. [chuckles]

    29. KS

      Create... I, I know. Create chaos-

    30. SG

      Right

  4. 29:2934:48

    Grammarly’s “Expert Review”

    1. KS

      stealing, essentially. Grammarly launched an expert review AI feature that gives editing suggestions supposedly inspired by well-known writers and journalists. Casey Newton discovered the tool was attributing advice to him and others even though they never agreed to participate. The feature even generated advice under the name of a certain tech journalist, Kara Swisher. Um, i- they've, they've stopped that now. They've gotten, they, they pulled back on it, apparently, but what an incredible bunch of information and identity thieves. I don't know what to say. Anytime these people can steal, they steal. They're such shoplifters. I don't know your thoughts.

    2. SG

      Well, it goes back to this mindset, and I thought one of the... I think there's looking glasses into people's souls.

    3. KS

      Mm-hmm.

    4. SG

      How they treat their pets, how they treat service staff-

    5. KS

      Yeah

    6. SG

      ... is sort of a, a, you know, when is their guard down? When are-

    7. KS

      Yep

    8. SG

      ... there are certain tells, right?

    9. KS

      Mm-hmm.

    10. SG

      And one of the tells that was really frightening when Sam Altman was asked about the energy consumptionOf AI. He said, "What people don't take into account is the amount of energy it takes and the amount of investment and resources it takes to get a human to a point where it can make logical decisions and engage in critical thinking."

    11. KS

      Mm-hmm.

    12. SG

      He said, "If you look at how much energy and input and resources it takes to raise a child such that it can get to a point where it can make decisions-

    13. KS

      Mm-hmm

    14. SG

      ... AI is better." I found that so nihilistic-

    15. KS

      Me too

    16. SG

      ... and so inhuman because what Silicon Valley, or at least some of the individuals we talk a lot about, don't realize is that we try and get ROI economically such that we can make low ROI investments in relationships and people we love. I, I'm not getting, I am not getting an ROI back from my children on any sort of economic level. I-

    17. KS

      Well, you use a lot of energy. I'm wondering if we should use as much energy for you as we do, but go ahead.

    18. SG

      Well, but the, the whole point, the whole shooting match-

    19. KS

      Mm-hmm

    20. SG

      ... of an economy and relationships and satisfaction and purpose and some sort of spiritual sense of calm and, and like your life mattered, is that you do engage in productive, you know, pro- productive economic or domestic labor such that you can invest that in other people. [chuckles] And you may or may not get a return, uh, but the point is the return you get is you're so invested in something that you, you... your life has meaning. The, the whole point is that you create value such that you can, you can, you can invest that value in relationships, and for most people, the most rewarding place of investment, where quite frankly they don't get anything resembling an economic ROI, is in children. And to look at it on that level is like, okay, you don't understand what it is to be a mammal or a human. And, and also the notion that you can spend 50 years of your life professionally working your ass off, staying late, starting in the mailroom at The Washington Post-

    21. KS

      Mm-hmm

    22. SG

      ... as you did, such that you have a voice, a reputation, a twist of phrase, an ability to string words together that compels people to action or provides insight, and then they can come in and just adopt that 50 years-

    23. KS

      Yep

    24. SG

      ... or piggyback on it.

    25. KS

      That piggyback, steal it, really.

    26. SG

      I- i- is-- Like I, if I type in, "Give me five jokes on this," or, or, "Give me a view on the oil price," and I put, "In my voice," it does a really good job because what it's doing is stealing from everything I have ever written-

    27. KS

      Right

    28. SG

      ... said, or done.

    29. KS

      That is correct.

    30. SG

      And so the music industry did this correctly. It said, "Okay, if we're KROQ," which is awesome, the best radio station-

  5. 34:4847:31

    Chatbots Help Plan Violent Attacks

    1. KS

      which has been attacked in all the-- and its cr- a-and its founder have been attacked legally by Elon Musk, and the federal government now in his, at his behest, um, tested 10 major-- They, they're keeping going, though. They don't care. Tested 10 major AI chatbots and found out 8 out of 10 were willing to help plan a violent attacks like school shootings, bombings, or assassinations. Researchers posed as a 13-year-old boys, as 13 little boys, showing how easily minors could get guidance on weapons, locations, and strategies. Only Anthropic's Claude and Snapchat's My AI consistently refused to assist in planning attacks, and only Claude attempted to dissuade the users. DeepSeek wished the user happy and safe shooting. And on that note, a lot of you have been writing in about a story in Canada. Earlier this year, an 18-year-old gunman opened fire at a school in, in Tumbler Ridge, British Columbia, killing eight people. Let's listen to a clip from a listener.

    2. SP

      I am calling because it seems to be that there is a connection now between the shooter and ChatGPT. The shooter was flagged by ChatGPT several months ago regarding some of, uh, their behavior online. ChatGPT didn't report it, which is one of the reasons why I am leaving this message, to see what your thoughts are

    3. KS

      On that. OpenAI is now being sued by the parent of the child who was injured in the shooting. I-- As you know, I've been at this for years, especially around kids, but it's jumped into people. Um, the most recent, uh, one of the most recent shootings, it was, it was this suicide was like an adult was, was changed by these chatbots. I cannot... Let's stop calling them chatbots. What an adorable word for synthetic beings, um, which-- who don't, who don't-- are not bound by legal... Like, if you're a lawyer and you did this, you'd go to jail. If you're an analy- if you're a, you know, a psychologist and you did this, you'd go to jail. If you were a person and you did this, you would go to jail. [chuckles] Like, all of the people go to jail. They're willing to assist in violent attacks, and they're not doing anything to rein it in. And it's not just kids, it's, it's everything. And again, the only one that is doing the right thing is Claude. And so-- and this is Anthropic, and this is the company. I'm not doing an ad for Claude here, but they have at least some-- And I think they should be regulated too. But I can't tell you how incandescent I am about the way these people try to take every p- bit for themselves, and they do not care the damage they are creating. And I, I, I'm gonna keep talking about this until Congress steps in and does something about it. You don't work for those rich people. You do not work for them. You-- And, and I, I'm with T-Telerik. Enough with these people. So go ahead. I just ranted.

    4. SG

      Well, I, I think it's important to draw a distinction between potentially creating some sort of psychosis that leads to self-harm or harm against others through overuse of, of AI or any other digital platform. I think that's a separate study that needs to be done, and without the interference of the massive money and lies and, and owned bought research that these, these firms will do. I think this is different. I think this is whether the federal government needs to put in place laws and incentives such that if a private organization or corporation receives information that this person might be on the verge of committing an act of violence, if they have a responsibility to report it to the authorities immediately. And I think they do. I'm not a privacy person. I'm not suggesting we go to Minority Report where we arrest them before they've committed a crime. But at, at my school o- or... [sighs] So, uh, my school in Florida, where my kids went, at another school, uh, and we, we all sh-shared information when I was involved with the school about these very difficult situations. A kid was drawing very, um, disturbing images of gun violence. And so the school felt like it had an obligation to report it, and then the FBI went to the house, and the FBI said, "Are there any guns in the house?"

    5. KS

      Mm-hmm.

    6. SG

      And I think that was the right thing to do.

    7. KS

      You're right. That-

    8. SG

      And-

    9. KS

      Makes sense to me

    10. SG

      ... if you notice, s- there was a video [chuckles] that went viral on Snap. A teacher put out a Snap saying that she wanted to kill these kids, and it immediately-- The cops showed up and said, "Uh, did you put-- Did you say this? Are you having any sort of mental issue right now? You need to go home, and we need to understand what is going on with you and if you-

    11. KS

      Yeah

    12. SG

      ... have access to guns before we let you back into a school."

    13. KS

      Mm-hmm.

    14. SG

      And the same is true here.

    15. KS

      Yeah.

    16. SG

      That if you are going to monetize this type of information, and you understand it so-- you can interpret it so well that you can create a prompt that keeps them on another second, another minute, or serves them the exactly right auto insurance ad, then in exchange for that economic benefit and what is clearly demonstrated ability to know what's going on with that person, if you see any evidence that that person might be capable of creating this type of crime, you have an obligation. You-- Bartenders, the bar, if a bartender continues to serve people alcohol, observing that that person is really drunk, and then that person-

    17. KS

      Yep. A very good analogy

    18. SG

      ... gets in a car and kills someone-

    19. KS

      Mm-hmm

    20. SG

      ... the bar is liable.

    21. KS

      Right.

    22. SG

      So if they have such incredible targeting, such unbelievable information, they can clearly tell that, okay, this individual is getting maps-

    23. KS

      Mm-hmm

    24. SG

      ... and, and identification and information is basically digitally casing-

    25. KS

      This is worrisome. We should investigate is what you're saying. This is worrisome

    26. SG

      ... a, a, a school, then immediately a message goes out to the local authorities saying, "Here is exactly what this person said. We have a judge involved. You get the order." And boom, y- they're in the house asking this person questions. I'm not saying they arrest them. They haven't done anything yet.

    27. KS

      Right. Right.

    28. SG

      But i-i-

    29. KS

      They would argue this is surveillance. They-- But of course, they don't mind selling surveillance.

    30. SG

      They're surveilling u- they're surveilling us to serve us ads. [laughs]

  6. 47:3157:30

    Barry Diller’s CNN Vision

    1. KS

      about wanting to buy CNN and what he would do with it. In a new interview, Diller says i- uh, CNN hasn't been managed optimally and had enormous inf- and, and it's, has enormous potential to influence. He says he told Warner Brothers CEO David Zazoff all this. Let's listen.

    2. SP

      I said to him, "I don't think you're programming... I, I don't think it's being optimally programmed. I don't think it's competitive." Now, by the way, the facts, uh, support that, uh, meaning that its ratings have declined, its revenue has declined. Still is quite profitable, but-

    3. SG

      How would you alter it?

    4. SP

      Oh, in every way, look, feel, and see, every way. And I mean, I hope I get the chance. I don't think I will, but I hope I do.

    5. KS

      Um, I'm not sure when this was, but I, I, I texted him. Um, he, he said, "That's not happening." [laughs] He said, "Not that, now that the Ellisons have it." Um, and they-- And he cor- quite correctly, and I happen to know this, they're gonna combine CNN and CBS. Um, he doesn't think he, he has a chance. I would love to work for [laughs] Barry Diller. Even-- He's much more conservative than I am, but, um, I would certainly love... Uh, he's such a good programmer. He's such an interesting... I mean, he does love journalism, even if he gets mad at it sometimes. He's someone I, I appreciate in that regard. Um, and it would... [laughs] I wrote him, I said, "Can you please?" And he's like, "There's no way." Uh, so I can, I can knock this one out of the water. He can't do it. Unless, please, Ellisons, sell it to Barry Diller. Uh, please, that would be great. So any thoughts?

    6. SG

      Uh, I would love to see Barry Diller partner with Jeff Zucker-

    7. KS

      Yeah

    8. SG

      ... and a private equity firm. And I think there's more, a greater likelihood than people believe that the Ellisons might say, "This is too big a headache. We might just sell c- uh, combine CBS and CNN to someone else." Because I think that, I'm not sure, and maybe I'm being naive here, I'm not sure they're as Machiavellian as people think about trying to control the world. Um, uh, uh, I don't know, but maybe they have some grand vision for how they integrate it into TikTok. But I, I can't imagine Larry Ellison, as smart as he is, isn't gonna say, "This is gonna be more headache than it's worth."

    9. KS

      No, they wanted the studios. I, I, I, I agree. They're, they're not quite as Machiavellian. They, they, they're, they're just opportunistic, I would say. I, I, you know-

    10. SG

      Well, they're, they're-- I think they're-

    11. KS

      David Ellison was q- was democratic-

    12. SG

      You're, you're the third richest man in the world-

    13. KS

      Yeah

    14. SG

      ... by focusing on, on economics.

    15. KS

      Yeah.

    16. SG

      And, and I think that... Anyways, I think there's a shot here.

    17. KS

      CNN makes a lot of money. Diller is correct. It makes a ton.

    18. SG

      It's high margins, but-

    19. KS

      High margins

    20. SG

      ... I did some analysis here, 'cause I just wanted to show you, like, w-

    21. KS

      Mm-hmm

    22. SG

      ... one, talk about some numbers at cable news. And I spent a decent amount of time last night, uh-

    23. KS

      Yeah

    24. SG

      ... on AI-

    25. KS

      Mm-hmm

    26. SG

      ... uh, looking at ratings and viewership. And essentially what I did was, just to give you a sense for-

    27. KS

      Please

    28. SG

      ... the ecosystem, and also, I never miss a chance to make Pivot look good.

    29. KS

      [laughs] It is good.

    30. SG

      I looked at gross viewership. That is the number, uh, or listenership. That's the number of people who watch a program-

  7. 57:301:05:18

    Predictions

    1. KS

      is it? What is it? Oh, one thing. I predict we're gonna have a great time at South by Southwest. All right, that's my prediction.

    2. SG

      That's what you're predicting?

    3. KS

      As always.

    4. SG

      All right. So my prediction is essentially, um, uh, I think the markets this year are gonna go down, uh, dangerously. I think, I think we're-

    5. KS

      Uh-oh

    6. SG

      ... I think we're on the precipice of, like, a $10 trillion wipeout.

    7. KS

      Whoa.

    8. SG

      Um-

    9. KS

      Really?

    10. SG

      Oh, yeah.

    11. KS

      Tell all.

    12. SG

      Well, not... And by the way, I get this wrong all the time. This is not financial advice, but I don't think it's from Iran. It's from what comes after Iran. Um, and this is, this is the chain reaction here. Uh, I don't think oil is gonna... I think oil is not gonna be at 150 bucks, but it's gonna be, it's, it's gonna be sustainably higher. It's gonna be elevated through the rest of the year, and inflation in some markets reignites. The Fed can't cut rates. They're trapped, um, to inspire the economy 'cause they're worried about inflation. I think corporate earnings are really impaired as consumers stop spending, uh, because some of them will be paying five bucks a gallon for gas, and their 401 [k] will start to decline. And Q2 earnings season becomes bad, and then what CEOs do when things are sort of bad is they throw in the kitchen sink, and they'll make it look like a bloodbath just to get all the-

    13. KS

      Mm-hmm

    14. SG

      ... bad shit out.

    15. KS

      That's a good idea, actually.

    16. SG

      But the real contagion-

    17. KS

      Mm-hmm

    18. SG

      ... uh, here is gonna be from emerging markets.

    19. KS

      Uh-huh.

    20. SG

      I think there's a decent chance that Pakistan and Egypt default-

    21. KS

      Oh, wow

    22. SG

      ... and as well as Sri Lanka and Bangladesh.

    23. KS

      Yeah.

    24. SG

      Dollar-denominated debt, very energy-dependent, very fragile economies because they all, they all... There's this domino effect in those markets because they can't afford oil imports, and their dollar-denominated debt just becomes unpayable. And then the real downward spiral starts. European banks holding that emerging d- market debt start announcing write-downs. Um, foreign banks, Deutsche Bank, BNP Paribas, all hugely exposed. Credit spreads blow out, and we get sort of a, not the s- to the same extent, but we get an '08 style which bank is next moment, except this time it's happening while the U.S. is fighting a war we started for no reason.

    25. KS

      Right.

    26. SG

      Uh, other than-

    27. KS

      It's an excursion, Scott. It's an excursion.

    28. SG

      Well-

    29. KS

      I'm teasing you. It's a war

    30. SG

      ... and well, that's the mistake here is it-

Episode duration: 1:05:18

Install uListen for AI-powered chat & search across the full episode — Get Full Transcript

Transcript of episode P6Ei-70UOEw

Get more out of YouTube videos.

High quality summaries for YouTube videos. Accurate transcripts to search & find moments. Powered by ChatGPT & Claude AI.

Add to Chrome