Job Market 2026: Why Everyone Is Getting Laid Off—And How to Be the Exception

1. 0:00 – 2:01

   Are AI Layoffs Real? The Truth Behind the Headlines

   1. MMMarina Mogilko0:00

      So this morning, I opened my phone, and it's the same story again and again. First, we heard a few days ago that Jack Dorsey's blog just laid off almost half of his staff and says AI is the reason. Just recently, Atlassian cuts 1,600 people to self-fund investments in AI. Your feed, my feed is full of AI took my job posts. Is this the beginning of a jobless future, or are companies just slapping AI on old-school layoffs to make them sound innovative? Today, we're gonna look at the data, the companies, and the people behind the headlines, and I will be joined by someone who actually knows the numbers. I actually use a report she creates every two years. It's called The Jobs Report by the World Economic Forum, and I was just there. She knows all the numbers, and she knows exactly what's happening on the job market. Are these layoffs AI? Should we be afraid? Should we be scared, or are companies just using the word AI to justify layoffs? By the end, you'll know which jobs are actually at risk, what AI native really means, and what you can practically do in the next 90 days to future-proof your career, even if you're not a tech person. I'm not a tech person, but I'm using so much of AI. I'm gonna talk about this. So what's going on on the market? Let's start with the headline that broke the internet, Jack Dorsey and Block, 4,000 people. So Block is the company behind Square, Cash App, and Afterpay, and they announced that they're cutting 40% of its workforce, more than 4,000 people, bringing headcount down to under 6,000. Jack Dorsey didn't say, "We had a terrible quarter." He didn't blame a recession. He explicitly pointed at intelligent tools and AI agents. In his letter and interviews, he says smaller, flatter teams can now do the same work, that AI fundamentally changes what it means to build and run a company, and that most firms will inevitably follow this path. Media from CNN to Forbes jumped on this story as one of the clearest examples of a CEO saying, "We laid people off because of AI." Okay, I had to talk to someone who's a professional in this. Ask Saadia Zahidi, Managing Director of World Economic Forum, are the AI layoffs real?

2. 2:01 – 2:39

   Saadia Zahidi: "Companies Are Using AI as an Excuse"

   1. SZSaadia Zahidi2:01

      Well, um, I'm gonna not say who it is, but I'm gonna share what they told me, which is that they feel that... It is one of the top people on, on, um, uh, jobs here, and he told me that essentially he thinks that a lot of firms are sort of maybe using this moment of concern around artificial intelligence to essentially take care of the, the issue that you're talking about, which is that there was some over-hiring three years ago.

   2. MMMarina Mogilko2:31

      Mm.

   3. SZSaadia Zahidi2:31

      And so now is the time to change that, and, you know, it's sort of a somewhat convenient moment to use this, this time to do that.

   4. MMMarina Mogilko2:37

      As an excuse.

3. 2:39 – 3:45

   Atlassian, Amazon, Microsoft: The Pattern Behind the Cuts

   1. MMMarina Mogilko2:39

      Okay.

   2. SZSaadia Zahidi2:39

      Right.

   3. MMMarina Mogilko2:39

      So from inside the room, the message is pretty blunt. Yes, AI is real, but it's also a perfect excuse to fix the over-hiring that happened during the last boom. Now let's talk about Atlassian and the AI restructuring narrative. Right after Block, Atlassian announced it would cut about 10% of its global workforce, roughly around 1,600 roles. Atlassian says it's self-funding bigger bets on AI and enterprise products. The CEO says that AI is changing the mix of skills we need, the number of roles required in certain areas, and he says we can't really pretend AI has nothing to do with it. And it's not just these two companies. Across 2025 and early 2026, companies from Amazon and Microsoft to media and fintech startups have cited AI in their layoff announcements. In the US alone, employers explicitly blamed AI for tens of thousands of job cuts in 2025, a huge jump from the years before. Sometimes that's real automation. Sometimes it's just smart branding for cost-cutting. Okay, let's move from buzzwords and press release to actual data. In early March, Anthropic, a company behind Claude, released one of the

4. 3:45 – 7:40

   What Tasks Are Already Being Exposed by AI

   1. MMMarina Mogilko3:45

      most detailed studies so far on AI and jobs, and I absolutely loved it. Thank you so much, Anthropic, for doing that. It's called Labor Market Impacts of AI: A New Measure and Early Evidence. So instead of asking, in theory, could AI do this task, they looked at observed exposure, where workers are already using tools like Claude to do their jobs right now, and here is what they found. For computer and math jobs, hello, my education, software engineers, data scientists, large language models could touch something like 90-plus percent of tasks. But in practice, workers report using AI on only a fraction of them so far. The jobs with the highest AI exposure today are white collar roles, business and finance, computer science, law, computer service. Comment down below if your job is listed here or your education is listed here. I'm mathematics and economics by education. Oh, and of course, office administration. Uh, there are some safe jobs. About 30% of workers have basically zero AI exposure right now, cooks, bartenders, mechanics, cleaners, many trades and in-person service jobs. And here's the subtle but important point. They don't see a big spike in unemployment yet for most AI exposed jobs. What they do see... is a slowdown in hiring into those roles, especially for younger workers. So the people in those jobs aren't losing them overnight, but it's getting harder for new people to get into those fields in the first place. Let me tell you my personal story. I totally see this trend. So I run three YouTube channels, two Instagrams, email newsletter, a lot of things. My team uses AI every single day for research, for scripts, for translations, for thumbnails, and we've been doing that for about 18 months now. And in the past three weeks, we deployed Claude Projects for almost every single social media that we run, and that sped up things immensely. I don't know if you noticed, but we started posting two videos in this, on this channel instead of one, and production just sped up. What one person does has changed completely. My producers are no longer spending hours on research. They are not writing first drafts from scratch. That time went into somewhere else, like producing more episodes, quality control, judgment calls, into the stuff that actually requires a human. And honestly, that shift from doing the work to directing it changes what you're worth, which brings me to today's sponsor. I run a media company with 35 people. I've been creating content for over a decade, and I still remember the early days when I'd said yes to any brand deal. Not really early days, like a year ago, I would still say yes to every brand deal. Anyways, low rates, insane timelines, editing at midnight. I thought if I said no, the deals would stop coming. The problem was never the content. I just didn't have the system for knowing what I was actually worth. The Viral Income Lab was built by marketing executives who work directly with brands, people who understand how brands decide budgets, what they look for in creators, and why some creators consistently get higher-paying long-term deals. They teach you how to calculate your rate, pitch professionally, negotiate without it being awkward, and turn one collaboration into a recurring partnership. It works whether you're on YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, or running a podcast. And you don't need millions of followers. The whole program lives exclusively on Kajabi, so everything is in one place. If your goal for 2026 is to build predictable income from your content, check it out. You get lifetime access to all the training videos, scripts, templates, resources, and guest expert sessions. Plus, and this matters, you get real human support from experienced marketing executives if you have questions before, during, and after negotiations. For my audience, the Viral Income Lab is available at a discounted price of $489, and that's lifetime access. Click the link in the description and start building sponsorships that actually respect your value. Now back to our conversation with Saadia. Around four weeks ago,

5. 7:40 – 8:45

   The Tasks Are Being Reshuffled — Not the Jobs

   1. MMMarina Mogilko7:40

      I asked my chief of staff, C- COO, I asked her to hire someone who would help me with scripts for brand deals. 'Cause it's like you need to look at what the brand sends you, then it has to be a personal story. Like, there are so many different points you need to connect for that. And we started looking, some testing some people, and people were like... We found someone who's genius, but like 1,000 pounds for a script for a 60-second video. I'm like, [laughs] expensive. And I trained a Claude project, and we completely eliminated a need to hire someone for just scripts. Did that scare me? Yes. The thing is, it is happening. It kinda makes me sad, but it kinda wants me to help you guys with the next steps because it is happening. And this is basically the story that this Anthropic report is actually telling. The jobs aren't disappearing yet. The tasks inside those jobs are being reshuffled. One person can handle more. You don't need more people. And the people who understand which of their tasks are being reshuffled and move proactively are the ones who come out ahead. Saadia explains this with a very simple picture. Imagine

6. 8:45 – 10:51

   Saadia: 50% Will Need Reskilling by 2030

   1. MMMarina Mogilko8:45

      the whole global workforce are just 100 people.

   2. SZSaadia Zahidi8:48

      Let's bring it down to let's pretend the entire global workforce is 100 people. Um, about 50, 50-something of them would need rapid reskilling by 2030. About 2/3 of those could be reskilled within their current role. That's what employers-

   3. MMMarina Mogilko9:09

      Mm

   4. SZSaadia Zahidi9:09

      ... are telling us. And about 1/3 of them would have to be reskilled or upskilled and redeployed into a different role inside the organization. However, there's about 11 people in this overall 100-person workforce that wouldn't necessarily have an easy place to be reskilled to.

   5. MMMarina Mogilko9:28

      Mm.

   6. SZSaadia Zahidi9:28

      And I think that's where the tension comes in. A lot of the change could probably be handled where people are currently employed, but there is going to be a significant share of the global workforce that will not find a role inside their own industry, that would need to move to a completely different industry, and that is where, you know, basic human connection and your social networks and your professional networks, that's where all of that comes in.

   7. MMMarina Mogilko9:56

      For... Out of those 11 people, which industries are they in?

   8. SZSaadia Zahidi9:59

      Oh, multiple industries. So we, we do take a look at what are the declining roles, what are the, um, growing roles. And when it comes to the declining side, I mean, you wouldn't be surprised to know that it includes people who are administrative assistants. It's people who are in some parts of customer service that is now getting digitally automated. Um, but there's also a lot of growth, right? So, you know, the, the, the highest growth sectors include agriculture, include education. These are all things-

   9. MMMarina Mogilko10:32

      Mm

   10. SZSaadia Zahidi10:32

       ... that the world population still very much needs. And the, the, the need... For example, there's, you know, a huge shortage of teachers around the world.That is still very much needed, and it doesn't mean that, you know, s- a profession such as that one is getting replaced by technology. So I do wanna present the full picture beyond the ones that, that are getting displaced.

7. 10:51 – 12:01

   The 11 People With Nowhere to Go

   1. MMMarina Mogilko10:51

      Mm-hmm. So the real danger isn't AI takes everyone's jobs. It's those 11 people out of every 100 who don't have a clear place to go. So even if today's layoffs are sometimes AI washed for shareholders, the deeper trend is real. Routine, rules-based office work is under pressure, and some jobs will naturally disappear or radically change as AI gets better. Let's talk about safer zones. Safer doesn't mean perfectly safe forever. But today, jobs with low AI exposure tend to be reality native jobs where you physically fix, cook, build, or care for things. Mechanics, electricians, plumbers. You've probably seen those viral reels where the plumber is the new millionaire. Chefs, cleaners, delivery, construction. High touch human roles where your main value is, that's what I'm looking for, emotional intelligence, complex human judgment. I don't know, a strategist inside a company or early childhood education, many healthcare roles, social and community work. These are much harder to fully automate because they combine physical presence, messy real world environments, and human involvement. Let me give you a useful framework, a way to figure out exactly where you personally stand. So every job has two layers.

8. 12:01 – 13:30

   Layer 1 vs Layer 2: A Framework to Know If AI Can Replace Your Work

   1. MMMarina Mogilko12:01

      Layer 1 is task layer, the repeatable rule-based work. Write this email, fill this report, answer this ticket, schedule this meeting, process the claim. Layer 2, this is AI. You're below AI here. Layer 2 is above AI, and this is the judgment layer, the stuff that requires context, relationships, you feel, you have intuition, experience. AI is eating Layer 1 fast everywhere across every industry, not just in tech, in law, in marketing, accounting, in medicine, and customer support. The Anthropic report found that for white collar roles, AI can technically touch over 90% of tasks. In practice, workers are using it maybe 30 to 40% right now, but that number is growing every six months. So the question is not, is my job at risk? The question is, what percentage of my day is Layer 1 versus Layer 2? If your answer is 80% Layer 1, meaning most of what you do is routine, templated, rule-based, you have a real problem. Not because you're gonna be fired tomorrow, but because every year that passes, your Layer 1 work gets cheaper, and the company doing your annual review knows that. If your answer is 80% Layer 2, judgment, relationships, strategy, creative decisions, you're actually in a stronger position than you were two years ago because, again, AI is handling the Layer 1 work for you, which means you can do more Layer 2 work in the same hours. Which brings us to the real question.

9. 13:30 – 14:55

   Saadia: The Skills That Will Matter Most by 2030

   1. MMMarina Mogilko13:30

      If you want to stay ahead of this curve, what should you actually learn? I asked Saadia what are the skills that every worker needs to develop today.

   2. SZSaadia Zahidi13:38

      I would say the human skills have just become even more important. So oddly enough, in a highly technologically driven world, it is the human skills that have become more important than ever before, and that's very clear from every two years, we put out this list of the top 10 skills, and, um, that's basically what comes through very loud and clear through that Future of Jobs, um, Survey. So that's one piece. There is some element of that which is also about being able to work closely with technology. But it's a couple of the top 10. Most of the skills in the top 10 relate to creativity, empathy, interpersonal interactions, leadership skills, social influence, self-management, being able to regulate your own self, especially in the midst of so much change. So those are the kinds of things that are rising to the top. Third point, unfortunately, those are not the skills that most employers test for.

   3. MMMarina Mogilko14:42

      Mm.

   4. SZSaadia Zahidi14:43

      Right? So most employers say that's what they want, but when you get into an interview process, that is rarely-

   5. MMMarina Mogilko14:49

      Yeah

   6. SZSaadia Zahidi14:49

      ... ever the set of things, unless people are doing it anecdotally, that is rarely ever the set of things that they're looking

10. 14:55 – 16:13

    The 3-Part Skill Set of People Who Will Thrive

    1. SZSaadia Zahidi14:55

       for.

    2. MMMarina Mogilko14:55

       So the paradox of the AI era is the more powerful the technology becomes, the more valuable the human skills become. And if you look across Saadia's work, the Future of Jobs Report, and the new AI research, the people who thrive tend to have a three-part skill set. Human skills, creativity, communication, empathy, leadership, social influence, self-management, the ability to handle work with other people. AI skills. Not building models from scratch, but using tools like Claude, ChatGPT, Copilot, and others to write first drafts, summarize, brainstorm, generate ideas, analyze data, knowing how to design good prompts and workflows so that AI does the boring part. Domain skills. Real expertise in something, marketing, law, finance, medicine, design, trades, the context you need to judge whether AI's answer makes sense and to turn it into real decisions. By the way, being AI native doesn't mean you work in a startup in Silicon Valley. It means that whatever you do, HR, sales, design, small business, your default is, "What can I offload to AI so I can spend more time on the uniquely human parts of this job?" The challenge is that most schools and companies still don't explicitly teach those skills. So where do you actually practice them?

11. 16:13 – 17:05

    Saadia: Why Group Work Is the Most Underrated Career Skill

    1. SZSaadia Zahidi16:13

       So I think education systems are starting to change-

    2. MMMarina Mogilko16:16

       Mm

    3. SZSaadia Zahidi16:16

       ... and recognize that the previous education system, which was deeply individualistic, competitive, right? If you got the, the number one position in your class, well, someone else had to be number two, for example. That's the old model. But I think a lot of education systems are starting to change, certainly from what we heard from some of the universities here. Um-Because they recognize the value of collaboration. They recognize the value of group work. And I would, you know, if, if there's one piece of advice I would give to anybody who is currently a student, take on some of those group projects, work with other people, see how you can negotiate, work together, collaborate, and you'll find that working with others, you're going to learn so much more, and it'll prepare you for the workforce, because that's what most of our workforces are.

12. 17:05 – 18:35

    Your 30/60/90 Day Plan to Stay Ahead

    1. MMMarina Mogilko17:05

       So if you're a student or early in your career, the fastest way to build future-proof skills isn't just another online course. It's projects with other people, group assignments, hackathons, side hustles, startups, volunteering, anywhere you have to negotiate, coordinate, and ship something together. To make this practical, here's a simple way to start. In the next 30 days, pick one AI tool and use it every day for your current work or studies, for writing, summarizing, analysis, or planning. In the next 60 days, ship one small AI-powered improvement, an automated report, a smarter template, a content generator. Perplexity Computer is blowing my mind right now with content generation. Something that serves you real time. In the next 90 days, pick one human skill from Saadia's list: communication, negotiation, leadership, self-management, and deliberately practice it in a real project with other people. If you do just that, you're already ahead of most people reacting to AI from fear instead of design. So where does it all leave us? Yes, some big companies are hiding behind AI when they fire people. It looks great to shareholders. We're optimizing, we're investing in the future. Sometimes that's true. Sometimes it's just a glossy label on old-school cost cuts. But under the PR, the deeper trend is still real and unavoidable. Routine, rules-based office work is being eaten by software and AI. New jobs are appearing in tech, green industries, healthcare, education, and they demand a different mix of skills. The premium is rising on people who can combine human skills, AI tools, and domain expertise. We asked Saadia what

13. 18:35 – 19:46

    Saadia: Her Advice to the Next Generation — And Why She's Still Optimistic

    1. MMMarina Mogilko18:35

       she would say to a young person who feels anxious seeing AI, geopolitical tensions, and automation all at once.

    2. SZSaadia Zahidi18:42

       All of these are potential trends. Some of these are trends that are highly likely to come true, yes. But throughout the last 20 years that I've been in the workplace, we have had these moments before. There has been, um, geopolitical tension before. There have been wars before. There have been technological changes before. A lot has happened. There's been the great financial crisis. Um, so there have been many disruptions. There's been COVID. So-

    3. MMMarina Mogilko19:18

       Oh, yeah

    4. SZSaadia Zahidi19:18

       ... I think we should, um, bear in mind that that hasn't dented employment yet, that hasn't... That has required us to be resilient and to adapt, and those are certainly skills that young people should develop. But I'm very... I remain always very optimistic and hopeful about the future, and that would maybe be my one piece of advice. Invest in yourself and-

    5. MMMarina Mogilko19:45

       Yeah

    6. SZSaadia Zahidi19:45

       ...

14. 19:46 – 20:41

    What You Can Control Right Now

    1. SZSaadia Zahidi19:46

       stay hopeful.

    2. MMMarina Mogilko19:46

       And stay optimistic. AI will absolutely change which jobs exist and how we do them, but it doesn't get to write the whole story. Governments, companies, universities, and you still have choices. You can't control whether a CEO decides to announce AI layoffs. You can control whether you become the kind of person whose job is easy to narrate away, or a kind of person who knows how to use AI, lead people, and create value in the new system. If you treat AI as a thing that's gonna take away your job, you'll spend the next few years really scared. If you treat it as new electricity for your career, your real job becomes to design how you're going to use it, and that job is only just beginning. If you enjoyed this episode, I highly recommend watching an episode that I've created with the CEO of LinkedIn on the future of jobs. He said more than a million jobs actually appeared because of AI, and he knows the data 'cause he's the CEO of LinkedIn. The episode is right here. Do not forget to subscribe to this channel, and do not forget to subscribe to my newsletter.

Episode duration: 20:41