The Twenty Minute VCPeter Lacaillade: Why Now is the Best Time to Invest in Emerging Managers | E1096
At a glance
WHAT IT’S REALLY ABOUT
Why Today’s LP Landscape Favors Agile Backers Of Emerging Managers
- Peter Lacaillade, a leading LP at SCS, explains why current market dislocation and LP pullbacks make this an unusually attractive time to back emerging managers, especially in venture and lower middle-market buyouts.
- He contrasts his multifamily office structure and incentives with those of pensions, endowments, and banks, arguing that many large pools of capital are structurally unable or unwilling to take the risks required to back the next generation of top managers.
- The conversation dives into how he evaluates GPs (emphasizing team quality and “force of nature” personalities over raw track record), constructs diversified portfolios of niche funds, and builds a scaled, fast-moving co-investment program.
- Lacaillade also covers secondaries, liquidity management, and the common mistakes both LPs and emerging managers make, arguing that thoughtful partner selection and long-term alignment matter more than chasing brand names or short-term optics.
IDEAS WORTH REMEMBERING
5 ideasNow is an unusually good time to back emerging managers.
With many traditional LPs overallocated or structurally constrained, strong emerging managers are more accessible than they were in the 2016–2021 boom, allowing newer LP programs to gain entry to future franchise firms.
Track record matters, but team quality and strategy fit matter more.
Lacaillade treats historical returns as only the 4th or 5th-most important criterion; he prioritizes quality of team, clear competitive advantage, right-sized fund, and strong alignment over backward-looking performance.
Do targeted, off-list referencing to avoid echo chambers.
He assumes on-list references will all be positive and instead seeks off-list, trusted sources to surface nuanced weaknesses or risks, using soft questions to draw out what a manager really lacks.
Build a barbelled, highly diversified manager portfolio with focused underlying funds.
His model is 10–15 funds per vintage, mixing large franchises and small, highly concentrated specialists; across those, 3–5 funds exceed expectations, 3–5 meet them, and 1–3 underperform, still yielding attractive blended returns.
A scaled, fast, and selective co-investment program can materially boost net returns.
By co-investing only alongside top managers in their core areas, targeting 2.5–3.5x net base cases, and running a process that can say “yes” in 1–2 weeks, SCS gains fee savings, deeper insight, and better alignment without pretending to be a GP.
WORDS WORTH SAVING
5 quotesWe had a choice: go into the B-plus funds everyone could access, or pick the next‑gen emerging winners. We chose the latter.
— Peter Lacaillade
Track record is important, but for me it’s maybe number four or five on the list.
— Peter Lacaillade
If I do ten funds, three to five exceed expectations, three to five meet expectations, and one to three underperform—and you still make money.
— Peter Lacaillade
If you see a venture fund on a bank platform, holy shit—that is not a good sign.
— Peter Lacaillade
Funds last longer than the average marriage. Don’t just take the quick money.
— Peter Lacaillade
High quality AI-generated summary created from speaker-labeled transcript.
Get more out of YouTube videos.
High quality summaries for YouTube videos. Accurate transcripts to search & find moments. Powered by ChatGPT & Claude AI.
Add to Chrome