Skip to content
a16za16z

Choosing Your Sales Strategy: Lighthouse vs. Landgrab

Elena Burger is joined by a16z's Andy McCall and Joe Schmidt to break down two very different ways AI startups can go to market: the lighthouse and the landgrab. Should founders win a handful of marquee customers whose credibility unlocks an entire industry, or move quickly across a broad market where the ROI already speaks for itself? Drawing on Joe's Lighthouse or Landgrab framework and Andy's experience building sales organizations at Samsara and Meraki, they explore how founders can determine which strategy fits their market, when social proof matters more than math, and why the current rush to adopt AI has created a rare window for startups to sell big software again. They also get tactical on POCs, pricing and ACV, hiring early sales teams, moving from mid-market to enterprise, and why founders shouldn't spend too much time perfecting their GTM strategy before talking to customers. As Andy puts it: spend 1% of your time on strategy and 99% executing. Timestamps: 00:00 - Intro 00:58 - The Lighthouse vs Land Grab Framework 06:57 - Samsara's ELD Mandate: The Perfect Land Grab Moment 13:26 - Lighthouse in Practice: Harvey, Decagon & Further AI 17:00 - ACV Discipline: Clear the Hurdle, Then Just Go 27:14 - Every Big Company Eventually Deploys Both Strategies 33:54 - Why Now Is the Moment to Sell Big Software Again 37:49 - The Biggest Mistake Founders Make Resources: Read Joe Schmidt's "Lighthouse or Landgrab": https://a16z.com/lighthouse-or-landgrab-how-to-pick-your-ai-sales-strategy/ Follow Andy McCall on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/amccall/ Follow Joe Schmidt on X: https://x.com/joeschmidtiv Follow Elena Burger on X: https://x.com/VirtualElena Stay Updated: If you enjoyed this episode, be sure to like, subscribe, and share with your friends! Find a16z on X: https://twitter.com/a16z Find a16z on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/a16z Listen to the a16z Show on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/5bC65RDvs3oxnLyqqvkUYX Listen to the a16z Show on Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/a16z-podcast/id842818711 Follow our host: https://x.com/eriktorenberg Please note that the content here is for informational purposes only; should NOT be taken as legal, business, tax, or investment advice or be used to evaluate any investment or security; and is not directed at any investors or potential investors in any a16z fund. a16z and its affiliates may maintain investments in the companies discussed. For more details please see http://a16z.com/disclosures.

Joe SchmidtguestElena BurgerhostAndy McCallguest
Aug 13, 202643mWatch on YouTube ↗

EVERY SPOKEN WORD

  1. 0:000:58

    Intro

    1. JS

      There's a moment right now to go sell big software again. We're now looking at a different way of doing business entirely.

    2. EB

      What are the lighthouse and landgrab sales playbook?

    3. JS

      Here's the framework for evaluating which playbook should you be following. There's this very obvious one, go after the very obvious companies here in San Francisco that probably have some sort of proof or social value associated with them, or, like, go out and sell in Ohio. Find people who need your solution.

    4. AM

      If you think about sort of the enterprise networking world in 2009, people thought we were crazy. Like, we had no chance of getting into the largest corporations in the world, the lighthouse, because Cisco and HP had them all tied up. But what we could do is we could say, "Listen, we can configure, we can deploy faster, we're simpler to use." And that was very much a landgrab strategy.

    5. JS

      Too few people are willing to pick up the phone and willing to get on the plane and willing to get, you know, in front of those customers right now because they feel like it sounds way more sexy to sell to JPMorgan Chase than to Schmeshmesh Morphin Chase. [laughing]

    6. AM

      I think the biggest mistake that I see founders make at an early stage, honestly, is just-

  2. 0:586:57

    The Lighthouse vs Land Grab Framework

    1. EB

      Welcome back to the a16z podcast. Today, we're getting into the single most expensive question an AI founder makes: how you sell. Joe Schmidt just wrote a piece called Lighthouse or Landgrab, which gets into the two dominant playbooks he's observed among enterprise AI startups. Joe, tell us about the piece in your own words. What are the lighthouse and li- landgrab sales playbooks?

    2. JS

      Yeah, and I... And this, this piece actually all stemmed back from an observation, uh, that I had actually driving up the 101 freeway. Uh, maybe this is, like, three, four, five months ago, I can't remember. And you just realize that you have the same kind of, like, two competing companies. Like, one's on one side of the freeway, and the other's on the other side of the freeway, and they're selling the exact same piece of software.

    3. EB

      [chuckles]

    4. JS

      And for some reason, they all have decided that the only relevant companies for this piece of software are in San Francisco and driving on the 101 freeway. And then this has gotten even more ridiculous, since obviously every bus has been w-wrapped and every-

    5. EB

      Mm-hmm

    6. JS

      ... you know, it's like planes are flying up above-

    7. EB

      Yeah, yeah, yeah

    8. JS

      ... and they're now towing, you know, towing startups. And so I think it's, it's all very clever, but it's all targeting the same kind of sales motion. The reality is you don't always have to do that.

    9. EB

      Yeah.

    10. JS

      Like, you don't always have to sell to the same companies in San Francisco. And so what I wanted to try to do is just tell, tell founders, like, "Hey, here's the framework for evaluating which playbook should you be following." There's this very obvious one, which is, like, go after the very obvious companies here in San Francisco, in New York City, in a major metro, that probably have some sort of proof or social value associated with them. Or, like, go out and sell in Ohio, go out and sell in Chicago, go out and sell in St. Louis. Find people who, who need your solution. Um, and so that was the whole point of the piece, is like, you don't always have to go sell to these notable logos, and, um, we'll see how that plays out, but that's why.

    11. EB

      And, and just to get a little bit deeper, like, when does it make sense for a, a founder to, you know, go and buy a giant billboard that you see when you're driving from SFO into the city? When does it make sense for you to kind of do a more targeted sales activity or, like, motion elsewhere?

    12. JS

      Yeah, and I think the way that we tried to make this make sense, of course, we did very, uh, consulting style with a two-by-two matrix.

    13. EB

      Mm-hmm.

    14. JS

      Um, I did never work at a consulting firm, but, um, I'll do my best. Uh, and so we really were thinking about, okay, what are the, the axes that we should be kind of mapping opportunities against? And so we decided upon, like, the Y-axis is really what we called, like, a b- the buyer's exposure. Um, and it's, it's intentionally called exposure because there's the exposure of, you know, making a mistake with the solution that you buy. There's also the solu- the exposure of the solution inside of your company. Like, does this, does this product that I'm selling to my customer end up, you know, being sh- is it shown to their end customers, right? Which is actually an important distinction. Um, and really just kind of the overall risk associated with buying this piece of software. So that was, like, kind of the Y-axis, and it goes from, like, high to low. Um, and then the, the X-axis is whether or not proof travels in any given market. And so, you know, if you think about, like, the top right would be proof travels in this market, um, and it's, it's high buyer exposure and high, you know, high buyer risk. Um, and the bottom left would... And, and that's a lighthouse market, right? Just to be clear. Um, and the bottom left would be, you know, low, low, uh, you know, low proof traveling, but also low buyer exposure, uh, and that would be a landgrab market. Um, and so I think those are actually quite different. And if you think about the, the, you know, the standard markets that fit into the lighthouse model, it's, you know, regulated industries. Oftentimes, there's a, a more constricted number of logos. Um, if you're wrong in the industry, like if the buyer buys the wrong piece of software and it ends up doing the wrong thing, uh, it can lead to of- you know, very bad things happening for your firm, uh, including, you know, potentially getting in trouble with the regulator, you know, even going, uh, and, and doing something illegal. That's very bad, uh, of course. Um, and then, uh, you know, on the, on the flip side, when you, uh, when you're looking at the more of a landgrab market, there's an established budget. People have been very, you know, used to and accustomed to paying for a type of service. And you can kinda come in there and show, like, the end buyer the math of, like, "Hey, my solution is better than whatever solution you're, you're using today," whether that's, you know, a, a software-driven solution or a human-driven solution. So, you know, the, the, the kind of distinction that we drew was between, like, proof on the bot- the top right of the bar- of the, of the quadrant, and math on the bottom left of the quad- of the quadrant. Um, and that's how we kind of thought about the framework.

    15. EB

      Yeah. And Andy, we'll get into your background, uh, in a little bit, but I think first maybe it's, it's good to kind of categorize some of these modern-day AI startups within these two frameworks. And I know you both work with a lot of these companies.

    16. JS

      Yeah.

    17. EB

      So, so Joe, I'm not sure if you wanna call out specific examples or, Andy, if you wanna call out specific examples and really just kind of, like, talk through the, the sales strategies that you're seeing.

    18. JS

      Yeah. I mean, well, you're like, you know, the, the, the landgrab, uh, you know-

    19. EB

      [chuckles]

    20. JS

      ... mastermind. So maybe you wanna talk about some of the stuff that you've seen?

    21. AM

      Yeah. Well, I mean, I, I think you, you framed it up really well in, in your, in your article. But, um, yeah, I think that concept of, like, the, the lighthouse being more in industries that require, you know, regulation, a lot of social proof, and so forth, and those tend to be companies that are going after, like, a category creation, right? It, it doesn't exist today, so therefore you gotta go out and you gotta kinda prove yourself with the big, the big names. And obviously, we have a bunch of portfolio companies out there.

    22. JS

      Yeah.

    23. AM

      There's a, there's a bunch of, of companies, I think you mentioned a couple in your article, that are doing that. And then on the other side, the, the, the sort of landgrab-

    24. EB

      Mm-hmm

    25. AM

      ... uh, you know, less social proof. But those tend to be, especially in the AI world today, those are companies that are maybe replacing or improving workflows that already exist. And there's existing budget, and again, we have a whole bunch of portfolio companies-

    26. JS

      Yeah

    27. AM

      ... you, you named a couple in the article, um, that are doing that today. They're inserting themselves in, saying, "Hey, we built a better way to go after this through AI." Uh, and, and I think those are the great, uh, you know, companies going after the landgrab strategy.

    28. JS

      Yeah. And, and it's interesting. I mean, um, for, for those that aren't, aren't familiar with, with Andy's background, you know, he's, uh, he's built some of the, the, the ... best sales organizations that I've ever heard of at Samsara and Meraki. Um, and I've always found, like, these, these stories, like, really fascinating and illuminating. Like the, the Samsara, you know, story around kind of the ELE- ELD mandate-

    29. AM

      Yeah

    30. JS

      ... is the way I understand it, um, kind of basically forcing the category to happen everywhere all at one point, and it's just who can go out there and do it fastest.

  3. 6:5713:26

    Samsara's ELD Mandate: The Perfect Land Grab Moment

    1. AM

      Yeah.

    2. JS

      Like, maybe just if you, if you could for, for the aud- audience's edification, like share a little bit about what that, like, big why now moment was.

    3. AM

      Sure.

    4. JS

      Because we're kind of having one right now.

    5. AM

      Yeah. [laughs]

    6. JS

      Um, and, and how you guys just kind of went and captured it.

    7. AM

      Yeah. Yeah, I think if you, uh, if you're in the industry, uh, for long enough, and I've got the gray hair to, to prove that I have been-

    8. JS

      Blonde. Blonde. [laughs]

    9. AM

      Blonde. Blonde. Yeah, bordering on gray.

    10. JS

      [laughs]

    11. AM

      Sure. Um, you know, you, you tend to see these big, you know, transitions and, and I'm old enough to have seen, you know, the, the internet come about and, uh, you know, certainly mobile and cloud and obviously now AI. And each, each of those causes this, this transition, and it, and it causes new ways to think about-

    12. JS

      Yeah

    13. AM

      ... how you go to market. Um, not wholesale changes, but always tools to help improve upon them. Um, and, and I think, uh, you know, the other thing I would say, um, I, I, I can't name too many companies that have become hugely successful without some element of timing and luck.

    14. JS

      Mm.

    15. SP

      Mm-hmm.

    16. AM

      Right? And so you talk about Samsara and, um, you know, the, the company was, uh, founded back in 2015. I joined in 2017. Um, and you know, the idea back then was, you know, at the very beginning it was like internet connected sensors, like all the value chains are gonna become sensored up. How do we, you know, get sensors out there, ingest this data, give it back to business owners in, in digestible and usable ways? Um, and one of the first products that started gaining traction were these telematics units.

    17. JS

      Mm.

    18. AM

      And, uh, you know, taking a step back, if you think about, you know, the, the world of transportation, long haul trucking, right? Um, you know, prior to like 2016, uh, they had these manual logbooks. If you were driving a truck and you stopped to take a break, you would write down in your logbook, "I just drove for four hours, now I'm taking a 20-minute break." And then, then you drove for two more hours, and you stop for lunch. And if you got pulled over by highway patrol, they would ask to see your logbook, and they'd audit and make sure you weren't driving too long. It was a, it was a safety regulation. And in the US, round about 2016, they implemented this ELD mandate, right? It stands, it stood for electronic logging devices, and the idea there was, hey, we can use technology to actually track when the vehicle's moving and when it isn't, and are they taking enough breaks and so forth, right? Take the human, uh, and, and, and data element out of it. Um, the human element rather. And, and so, you know, over a two-year period, that was basically implemented between 2016 and 2019 with various phases of, of sort of compliance. But what it did is it, it provided this huge tailwind-

    19. JS

      Mm

    20. AM

      ... for anybody making these electronic logging devices, and we just happened to be one of the newer companies doing it.

    21. SP

      Mm.

    22. AM

      And there were some very, very established players, right? AT&T had a solution. Verizon had a solution. There were a number of companies that were in sort of a, you know-

    23. JS

      Yeah

    24. AM

      ... hundreds of millions, half a billion in revenue already doing this. And, you know, rising tide floats all boats. It helped everybody. But if you were a new entrant into the market like we were at Samsara, it really helped because basically the entire industry all of a sudden had to find budget to go out and, and buy these things.

    25. JS

      Mm-hmm.

    26. AM

      And a certain percentage of them, you know, clearly would say, "Hey, let's check out what's new out there."

    27. JS

      Yeah.

    28. AM

      "Are there any new entrants into the field?" And so it really helped kind of, you know, give us a, a, a boost.

    29. JS

      How did you navigate, like, the, the social proof side of that? 'Cause like, uh, you know, I think, uh, the casual observer might think about that and say, "Okay, wow, this is regulated. Like, we can't screw this up," so you probably have to go win, I don't know what the largest long haul trucking company is. I'm trying to think of the ones I see on the freeway. But in any event, you probably have to go win that one, but it doesn't sound like that's what you did. From what I understand, that's not what you had to do. So how'd you navigate that social proof element?

    30. AM

      Yeah. Well, I, I think, um, you know, I, I, I would, uh, and maybe I'm doing a little bit of disservice to, to, to, uh, the amount of strategy that went into this, but there wasn't a lot of strategy that went into, like, do we chase lighthouse accounts-

  4. 13:2617:00

    Lighthouse in Practice: Harvey, Decagon & Further AI

    1. AM

      to us."

    2. JS

      Yeah, yeah.

    3. EB

      So maybe it's worth getting specific about some of these companies. I know in the piece you talk about Hevia and Harvey-

    4. JS

      Yeah

    5. EB

      ... as, as classic lighthouse examples, and then Stood and Decagon-

    6. JS

      Yeah, yeah

    7. EB

      ... as, as landgrab. So maybe do you guys wanna talk about some of those, those playbooks that you've seen-

    8. JS

      Yeah

    9. EB

      ... or maybe, like, give other examples?

    10. JS

      Sure. Yeah. Sure, I mean, I, I can go and you jump in. Um, you know, uh, so for example, I, I highlight Stood in the article as, like, the, the prototypical example of, uh, of a landgrab g- company that we're seeing in this new age. And so, uh, Stood, this amazing business founded by, you know, two incredible entrepreneurs, um, Tark and Ben, and, um, what they are going after is the accounts receivable market. And for listeners, uh, who maybe have never thought about, like, AR, accounts receivable, basically s- you know, this is when someone owes you money, you know, in an enterprise context, and you have to go collect the money from them. This is not glamorous. Um, but however, there has been, you know, a mechanism to do this historically, right? There are collections teams, and there's big pieces of software like, um, you know, I won't say their names 'cause the compliance will probably bleep them out anyway. So-

    11. EB

      [chuckles]

    12. JS

      ... there are big companies that do lots of ARR that, uh, that sell on this market, but it's been very manual, right? These, these human teams have to interact with this piece of software, and they have to go out there, and they have to sell, um, or have to go, they have to go collect. And so what Stood said was, "Hey, AI's actually quite good at, you know, basically having conversations with, with people. It's very good at looking at information internally and basically doing this process end to end. And so we could reimagine this historic, you know, way of doing collections, and instead of having humans do it, we can have humans plus AI do this, um, and, and do it even more effectively." And that, what that-- they then saw that open up was, like, the rest of kind of like, you know, order to cash and basically the entire kind of, uh, accounts receivable suite. Um, and so what they basically went out and showed, uh, all of their early-stage buyers was, in doing this, we have the math to prove it. We will be more effective than your current solution and your current h- human teams at collecting. And this will do X, Y, Z for, you know, it'll improve working capital by a tremendous amount. Um, it'll save you money. It'll actually make you more money. Um, so they were able to go out to the mid-market and just basically show the math and be like, "Would you like to, you know, have this solution, yes or no?" Um, so that's a really good example of a l- of a, of a landgrab market. Um, and those entrepreneurs are just, like, unbelievable sellers. They hit the pavement better than anyone, um, uh, just as good as anyone, as anyone I've ever seen. Um, and, uh, and, and they're doing a great job. You know, another example on the, on the lighthouse side would be, you know, we, we highlight Harvey in, in our article. Um, and they just did a fantastic job of winning the right law firms for this very new, very, you know, theoretically high-risk initiative where you're augmenting your human workforce with, you know, AI, AI capabilities and really automating what, you know, um, uh, you know, uh, junior lawyers would be doing, um, on a day-to-day basis. And so when they won the first kind of, you know, few critical lighthouse accounts, um, inside of their market, like, that proof traveled, like, big time.

    13. EB

      Mm-hmm.

    14. JS

      Um, and, uh, and then, you know, the buyers that had, like, this tremendous amount of exposure realized, "Hey, it's actually safe for me to buy this-"

    15. EB

      Yeah.

    16. JS

      "... this solution."

    17. EB

      Yeah.

    18. JS

      So those are the two kind of counter exam- or, you know, two examples in this market. I don't know if there's anything you, you'd highlight from other companies you're working with or-

    19. AM

      I mean-

    20. JS

      ... things you've seen.

    21. AM

      Yeah, I mean, those are two great examples. Um, yeah, I'm doing a, a decent amount of work with a company we invested in called Pylon. Uh, they're basically the AI native, um, customer support, and they're a great, uh, example of, of, uh, of landgrab. They're doing a fantastic job right now of just going out and saying, "Hey, we've got a better way of doing this." Uh, and you know, they have, uh, you know, they, they've been climbing up the ACV ladder, but, you know, they started at pretty modest ACVs, uh, and have been working their way up just by going out and replacing.

    22. JS

      Mm-hmm.

    23. AM

      And they have a fantastic go-to-market team that's just out executing.

    24. JS

      This, this ACV question is actually

  5. 17:0027:14

    ACV Discipline: Clear the Hurdle, Then Just Go

    1. JS

      kind of an interesting one, and I, I'd be curious how you thought about it at, at Meraki or Samsara. Um, you know, there's, there's so much demand out there, and there's so many different ways of, like, kind of building your go-to-market engine. Like, how much did you actually even think about what you were landing at-

    2. AM

      [chuckles]

    3. JS

      ... with these, like, you know, it maybe go back to when you were at, like, I don't know-

    4. AM

      Yeah

    5. JS

      ... 10 or 50 of ARR-

    6. AM

      Yeah

    7. JS

      ... at one of these businesses. Were you optimizing for that, or was it just like, let's basically figure out how to get enough reps in and-

    8. AM

      Yeah

    9. JS

      ... just-

    10. AM

      It's a good question. I, the, the answer is you think about it a lot, and then you try and not think about it at all. And what I mean by that is you wanna make sure that the ACV that you're going after, it, it has to, it has to top the hurdle, right? Uh, in, in other words, you look at your unit economics and is it healthy or not? You don't wanna be taking deals that are-

    11. JS

      Yeah

    12. AM

      ... you know, negative to your unit economics.

    13. JS

      Yeah.

    14. AM

      But if it passes the threshold, then the answer is you don't think about it. You just go.

    15. JS

      Mm-hmm.

    16. AM

      And you get as many of those as you can. So if you can build a go-to-market engine, just theoretically, that could live off of 15K ACV deals-

    17. JS

      Yeah

    18. AM

      ... fantastic.

    19. JS

      Yeah.

    20. AM

      Like, don't take 8K ACV deals.

    21. JS

      Yeah.

    22. AM

      But go get as many 15K ACV deals as you can.

    23. JS

      Yeah.

    24. AM

      And, and you wanna just build a repeatable engine and pour fuel on the fire and get as many of those as you can.

    25. JS

      Yeah.

    26. AM

      And then what happens over time is you start inching up, right?

    27. JS

      Mm-hmm.

    28. AM

      Bigger and bigger companies like what you're doing then, and, and you start stacking up, you know, the wins-

    29. JS

      Yeah

    30. AM

      ... and going up the ACV ladder.

  6. 27:1433:54

    Every Big Company Eventually Deploys Both Strategies

    1. JS

      with us on that front.

    2. AM

      I, I, I'll also say that, you know, every, every small company wants to become a big company. I don't know too many very large successful companies that at some point in time haven't deployed both strategies.

    3. JS

      Yeah. No, I would say-

    4. AM

      You might start off with land grab, but then you mature and you have a lighthouse strategy, or you start-

    5. JS

      Yeah

    6. AM

      ... with lighthouse and then you get big enough that you can go br- broad, you know, into land grab. So I, I think for founders, when I get this question early on, do what makes the most sense for your business right now.

    7. JS

      Yep.

    8. AM

      What does that mean? Go out and talk to customers.

    9. JS

      [chuckles]

    10. AM

      Find out where the early, earliest and easiest sales are, and pursue that strategy. It doesn't mean you're completely, you know, punting on the other one.

    11. JS

      Yeah.

    12. AM

      It just means come back to it.

    13. EB

      Mm-hmm.

    14. AM

      And in, in both of the last companies that I worked for, both Meraki and Samsara, we started with land grab, but as soon as we matured and started getting up into enterprise, then what do you do? Well, you verticalize and all of a sudden, like great, who are the top five, you know, transportation companies? Who are the top five-

    15. JS

      Yeah

    16. AM

      ... warehousing companies? Who are the top five, you know, public sector? And then you wanna go take those down.

    17. JS

      Yeah.

    18. AM

      And so you can morph into a land grab strategy. You just wanna do what's most efficient and most effective for the stage of the company you're at.

    19. JS

      Talk, can you talk a little bit about like one of those like key markets that you unlocked with like you went from land grab early to, you know, lighthouse in a given market. Like what did you-

    20. AM

      Yeah

    21. JS

      ... how did you set up that team? Um, or like was it just you or the founders that was going into this new market? And then like, you know, maybe a little bit about some of those deals that you closed. I'm just curious how this played out-

    22. AM

      Yeah

    23. JS

      ... with the sequencing.

    24. AM

      Well, I, I think, uh, you know, at, at both Meraki and, um, Samsara, uh, you know, the, the sort of earliest example of, of, um, lighthouse was when we verticalized, and in both those instances, it was basically into like public sector. At Meraki, it was going after like school districts-

    25. JS

      Oh, interesting

    26. AM

      ... because that was sort of low-hanging fruit. And, you know, if you're, if you, if anybody, anybody's o- ever sold to school districts, like they all talk to each other, they all know each other.

    27. JS

      Yeah.

    28. AM

      You wanna find the biggest school districts in each state, and if you can take that down, every school district underneath them says-

    29. JS

      Yeah, well said

    30. AM

      ... "Oh, what did that one buy? Great."

  7. 33:5437:49

    Why Now Is the Moment to Sell Big Software Again

    1. JS

      now. There's this crazy kinetic energy inside of companies where they're saying, "Hey," it could be even something as, you know, fundamental as CRM, right? It could be as fundamental as HR or ITSM. We're now looking at a different way of doing business entirely. This is not a skeuomorphic one-to-one replacement, green to blue. We're now thinking about, like, humans are gonna be doing something completely different.

    2. EB

      Mm-hmm.

    3. JS

      Way more high value. We're gonna be doing way less of the, the same kind of, you know, mundane rote work. Um, and instead, agents are gonna be doing that, doing that. And so that's, I think, the opportunity right now, and it's why instead of talking about, like, of course, we gotta talk about PLG and, like, all these other sales models, there's a moment right now to go sell, you know, big software again, right? And to, and g- and to go sell platforms and, and it's because of this moment. Um, and so I think people need to be studying kind of the 15 years ago models of, like, how people build this and the up- and the ecosystems around it, um, to go and have success.

    4. AM

      Yeah, I think that's right. I, I will say I think the consistent trend, uh, as long as I've been doing this, is that, you know, every year and with every technology transition, buyers become more and more educated.

    5. JS

      Yes.

    6. AM

      Right? So the buyer today just fundamentally has a better idea of what they want than they did five years ago, 10 years ago, 15 years ago.

    7. JS

      Yeah.

    8. AM

      And so, you know, that does lend itself more towards, you know, i- if you can hit that buyer when they're in their decision mode, you're gonna have a better chance. It doesn't have to necessarily be PLG.

    9. JS

      Yeah.

    10. AM

      But it can be more self-serve. It can be... It's, it should be an easier sell than, you know, 10, 15, 20 years ago, where you had to take them on this entire education journey, why you need this, how it works, here's how you're gonna... Right? Like, they're just so much more educated now on what they want to buy, that your job is just convince them that your company is the right solution for that.

    11. EB

      Mm-hmm.

    12. JS

      Amen.

    13. EB

      Yeah. Yeah. I guess they're, the, the lighthouse kind of, like, definition just gets pushed ever outwards-

    14. JS

      Yeah, yeah

    15. EB

      ... or you kind of like, yeah, just have to keep on conquering new territory. I'm curious, I, I assume a company just can't stay a lighthouse forever, and you, you even alluded to this, Andy. Like, what, what is kind of the average amount of time that a company kind of can just, you know, chew off those, those bigger logos and then, you know... Like, like, what is that transition moment like, I guess?

    16. AM

      Yeah. I mean, theoretically you could, right?

    17. EB

      Mm-hmm.

    18. AM

      If, if you were a company that was dedicated or committed to a, you know, multi-product strategy, you could just keep coming out with new products-

    19. JS

      Mm-hmm

    20. AM

      ... and you can keep going after-

    21. JS

      Yeah

    22. AM

      ... you know, more verticals, right?

    23. JS

      Yeah.

    24. EB

      Yeah, yeah.

    25. AM

      Like, you could theoretically do that, and I, I think there's probably some examples we could come up with of companies that did that. But, but yeah, in general, you know, if you start with a lighthouse strategy, you've built the social proof, you've gotten these big names, then what you wanna do is you wanna run the category underneath it.

    26. JS

      Yeah.

    27. AM

      Right? [chuckles] If I've gotten the top five financial companies in the world, I wanna run down, you know, the list after that, and so- That fundamentally becomes a little bit different of a sales motion, right?

    28. JS

      Yeah.

    29. AM

      You're spending less time with, you know, the huge organization, the big logo, you know, selling and-

    30. JS

      Yeah

  8. 37:4943:40

    The Biggest Mistake Founders Make

    1. AM

      I, I think, I think the biggest mistake that I see founders make at an early stage, honestly, is just spending too much time trying to figure it out.

    2. JS

      Yeah.

    3. EB

      Mm-hmm.

    4. AM

      Right? Like, too much time on the strategy.

    5. JS

      Yeah, yeah.

    6. EB

      Yeah.

    7. AM

      And strategy's important, but you should spend, like, 1% of your time on the strategy-

    8. JS

      Yeah

    9. AM

      ... pick it, and then spend 99% of your time trying to execute.

    10. JS

      Yeah.

    11. EB

      Mm-hmm.

    12. AM

      So, you know, rather than sit back and say, "Well, you know, should we do lighthouse or should we do landgrab?" Get out, talk to your customers, figure out which ones, you know, are, are willing to, you know, buy your product with the features and the services that it delivers today, and then chase that path.

    13. JS

      Yeah.

    14. AM

      Right? There's no bonus points for hard-earned revenue. You know, you don't-

    15. JS

      [laughs]

    16. AM

      ... get extra, you know, multipliers on your revenue if you get the big logo or something.

    17. EB

      [laughs]

    18. AM

      Like, go after the customers you can.

    19. EB

      Yeah.

    20. AM

      You know, and then, you know, constantly be improving your product, and then, you know, you can always reassess your strategy. You, you, after the first year, if you've hit-

    21. JS

      Yeah

    22. AM

      ... all your, your revenue milestones, you can look at it and say, "Well, could we be more effective doing this?" Maybe.

    23. JS

      Yeah.

    24. AM

      But just don't spend too much time in analysis paralysis mode.

    25. JS

      Yeah. Totally agree with that. I totally agree with that.

    26. EB

      Joe, Joe, you had some, you had some fun questions for Andy.

    27. JS

      Some lightning rounds.

    28. EB

      I, it was some lightning round questions.

    29. AM

      Yeah, lightning round. Okay.

    30. EB

      Yeah.

Episode duration: 43:55

Install uListen for AI-powered chat & search across the full episode — Get Full Transcript

Transcript of episode aakZLqxRQfo

Get more out of YouTube videos.

High quality summaries for YouTube videos. Accurate transcripts to search & find moments. Powered by ChatGPT & Claude AI.