Skip to content
AcquiredAcquired

Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi

Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi dropped by the Acquired studio for an Eats delivery, so we broke out the cameras and asked him to hang out for a wide-ranging conversation. :) We talk about his 20 years working with Barry Diller, starting his career at Allen & Company, how the Uber CEO search process ACTUALLY went down… and oh yeah, the massive transformation that’s happened at Uber over the past few years. When Dara took over the company it was bleeding huge sums of cash, losing share to competitors and embroiled in one of the biggest corporate controversies in recent memory. Fast forward to today and it’s turned cashflow positive while also having tripled revenue to over $30B (on $120B in GMV) and solidified its rideshare dominance in the US. And in perhaps the biggest change, it’s done it all while staying out of the headlines. Tune in! ACQ2 Show + LP Program: Subscribe to our interview show, ACQ2! https://pod.link/acquiredlp Become an LP and support the show. Help us pick episodes, Zoom calls and more. https://acquired.fm/lp Sponsors: Thanks to our fantastic partners, any member of the Acquired community can now get: 20% off Common Room’s Team plan for 2023 https://bit.ly/acquiredcommonroom Up to 10% off your first year of business insurance with Vouch https://bit.ly/acquired-vouch A free trial of PitchBook + links to research reports! https://bit.ly/acquiredpitchbook Links: Ben & David on My First Million https://pod.link/1469759170/episode/dcec340c735d9bb01f08d4508f7c5caa Note: Acquired hosts and guests may hold assets discussed in this episode. This podcast is not investment advice, and is intended for informational and entertainment purposes only. You should do your own research and make your own independent decisions when considering any financial transactions. © Copyright ACQ, LLC

David RosenthalhostBen GilberthostDara Khosrowshahiguest
Jun 13, 20231h 37mWatch on YouTube ↗

EVERY SPOKEN WORD

  1. 0:013:48

    Setting the stage: Uber’s post-IPO transformation and why Dara now

    1. DR

      So, uh, I came up here, we scheduled this time to record. What are, what are we talking about today?

    2. BG

      [exhales] I mean, we haven't talked about Uber in a while.

    3. DR

      Hmm, that's right. A lot has happened since we did the IPO episode.

    4. BG

      It's been, what, four years? That is crazy. All right. Yeah, let's do it. I ordered some food. I hope that's okay if, uh-

    5. DR

      Oh, yeah, yeah.

    6. BG

      Um, maybe we can eat [knocking] while we, uh, while we... [door opens] Oh, dear. Hey, did someone order Uber Eats? Oh, yeah, that's me. All right, cool. Um, got some wine in here. Oh, great. That's perfect. So can I join you guys?

    7. DR

      Sure.

    8. BG

      Actually, yeah, that'd be great.

    9. DR

      Yeah.

    10. BG

      Come on in.

    11. DR

      Come on in.

    12. SP

      Who got the truth? [singing] Is it you? Is it you? Is it you? Who got the truth now? Hmm. Is it you? Is it you? Is it you? Sit me down, say it straight, another story on the way. Who got the truth?

    13. BG

      Welcome to this episode of Acquired, the podcast about great technology companies and the stories and playbooks behind them. I'm Ben Gilbert.

    14. DR

      I'm David Rosenthal.

    15. BG

      And we are your hosts. Today's episode is an interview with Uber CEO, Dara Khosrowshahi, where he joins us from the Acquired home studio in Seattle. And it's been a while since we checked in on Uber. They've gone through quite the transformation since our 2019 episode on IPO day. In the past 12 months, they've done over $30 billion in revenue, up from just $10 billion two years ago.

    16. DR

      And that's not GMV, that's revenue.

    17. BG

      That is revenue. And they have two businesses, as many of you know, that complement each other nicely in Eats and Mobility, and they've divested anything hardware, international, or that's too far in the future or speculative. They're even doing something we couldn't imagine at IPO time, which is profitability. Now, it's very modest at this point, but we wouldn't have dreamed Uber could even get to break even back when they burned... David, what was it? $3 billion the year before the IPO.

    18. DR

      Yeah, I think it was the most capital burned before an IPO by any company in history up to that point.

    19. BG

      Well, today's discussion, of course, is partly about Uber, as we're alluding to here. But as David and I evolve the interview format, we're putting more of a focus on Dara as a person and sharing some of his craziest stories from throughout his whole career. So this is a candid conversation that dives into moments like buying Expedia right when 9/11 happened, how he first met Barry Diller at Allen & Company, and what the financial mechanics are actually like of replacing Uber's entire shareholder base, or close to it anyway, almost in its entirety, since joining the company.

    20. DR

      Yeah, not to mention the Uber CEO recruitment process, which I don't think Dara's talked about anywhere else before.

    21. BG

      No, I don't think so either. Well, if you are not already in the Slack, you totally should join. So many smart folks commenting on episodes and bringing new information after we record that we didn't find in the research, because many of you work in the fields that we're actually covering on episodes. So you can join at acquired.fm/slack. Listen to our other episodes on our second show, ACQ2, like a great episode we just did with Jake saper from Emergence on AI moats in B2B SaaS. And without further ado, this show is not investment advice. David and I may have investments in the companies we discuss, and this show is for informational and entertainment purposes only. Onto our conversation with Dara. [glass clinking] Cheers. Dara.

    22. DK

      Cheers.

    23. BG

      Welcome to Acquired.

    24. DK

      Thank you very much. Happy to be here.

    25. BG

      Appreciate you, uh, swinging by the home studio on your way home from Expedia board meeting. Is that right?

    26. DK

      Yes.

    27. BG

      How'd that go?

    28. DK

      Uh, I can't tell you.

    29. BG

      Yeah, that's, uh, [laughing] that's the right answer. [laughing]

    30. DK

      But it was a good board meeting.

  2. 3:487:39

    Expedia’s defining moment: buying travel into the shock of 9/11

    1. BG

      Actually, Expedia is a good place to start. For folks who don't know about your pre-Uber background-

    2. DK

      Mm-hmm.

    3. BG

      ... you were the CEO of Expedia from 2004 to 2017.

    4. DK

      Yeah.

    5. BG

      Is that right?

    6. DK

      Thirteen years.

    7. BG

      Thirteen years.

    8. DK

      That's a long time.

    9. BG

      And when you became the CEO, your previous role was you were at IAC with Barry Diller, and you guys had bought a controlling interest in Expedia. You took it private. It was at Microsoft with Rich Barton. He spun it out, it went public. You made a bid to take it private, I think over, like, two tranches. There was, like, a controlling interest and then a full buyout.

    10. DK

      Yeah, we bought Microsoft's stake. Microsoft decided it's, it's non-core, and we bought Microsoft's controlling stake, and Expedia was a public company, but we had a control position. And then at some point, we decided, "Hey, let's bring in the whole thing," because we loved what Rich and team were building.

    11. BG

      So this being Acquired and us wanting to dive into a story, there's one moment in particular that was pretty insane. The term sheet was signed for IAC to buy Expedia before September 11th-

    12. DK

      Yeah

    13. BG

      ... like earlier in 2001. The deal hadn't closed yet. I think there was some kind of material adverse change clause that allowed-

    14. DK

      MAT clause, they called it, yes. Correct.

    15. BG

      You were allowed to pull out of the deal.

    16. DK

      Yes, yes. I mean, it... what could be more material than September 11th for travel?

    17. BG

      But you guys didn't. Like, take us through that.

    18. DK

      Yeah, we, we didn't, and we knew we had the option to get out.

    19. BG

      Yeah.

    20. DK

      And at the time, you know, one of the values of an option is time value, right? You don't want to exercise an option before the last, uh, moment that you can. And Rich called, I think, Barry at the time, and he said, "Listen, September 11th happened. Business obviously has fallen off a cliff. We think it'll come back, but I don't know." And he said, "The place is pretty unstable now because no one knows whether the deal is gonna go through or not go through. There's this MAT clause, so if you wanna get out, like, it's fine." Rich is very confident. He's a great entrepreneur. "It's fine if you wanna get out- [laughing]

    21. BG

      [laughing]

    22. DK

      ... but just, like, let us know, you know-

    23. BG

      Yeah

    24. DK

      ... if you, which, which way you wanna go."

    25. BG

      Ah, God, he's good.

    26. DK

      And he's really good. And-

    27. DR

      Which really, he just... To your point about time value, he just wants you to make a decision, and so he's like-

    28. DK

      You know-

    29. DR

      ... "Oh, we'll be fine!" But, like, how do you-

    30. DK

      I do not, I can't imagine that if you're the company, everyone's like: What's happening, right?

  3. 7:398:47

    From 9/11 to COVID: what crisis forced Uber to become

    1. DR

      Did you ever think you would, uh, then live through [laughing] another moment like that-

    2. DK

      [laughing]

    3. DR

      - over the last couple years?

    4. DK

      No, and I'd like this one to be finally-

    5. DR

      Yeah [laughing]

    6. DK

      ... the last one. Never want to go through something like that again. But it, it made, it made us stronger as a company.

    7. DR

      Ultimately, good for Uber the past couple years?

    8. DK

      Yeah, I, I think the pandemic was incredibly painful in that sitting together as a team, 85% of your mobility volume, which was the profit driver of the company, falls off a cliff. And other CEOs, you know, they lost a ton of business, but most of these businesses were profitable. We were losing $2.5 billion, and then it just got way worse. So it was a very tough situation to be in, and we, uh, had to cut a lot of overhead. We had to cut out businesses that we thought were core to the business. You really had to bet on what's core, what's non-core. But it was a huge accelerator as it relates to our Eats delivery business, and I think that discipline in hindsight has been great. But I wouldn't want that as... That shouldn't have been the kind of-

    9. DR

      The precipitating factor.

    10. DK

      Yeah, exactly.

    11. DR

      Yeah.

    12. DK

      Yeah.

  4. 8:4713:37

    Meeting Barry Diller: the Allen & Co ‘thrown in the deep end’ story

    1. BG

      All right, before I let David bring us to today already, let's go back down memory lane. So how did you meet Barry Diller?

    2. DK

      So I met Barry Diller when I was an analyst at Allen & Company, which was my first job out of college. It's an investment bank in New York City, specializes in the media and entertainment sector. Now, much more tech. They've made the pretty cool transition, and I was a lowly analyst. And I got assigned to this deal where Barry Diller, who at the time was running QVC... He was the CEO of QVC, which was home shopping.

    3. BG

      And he had run Paramount and Fox Studios-

    4. DK

      Yes

    5. BG

      ... before that?

    6. DK

      Correct. Paramount first, and then he ran Fox for Murdoch, and then he decided he wanted to be his, his own boss.

    7. BG

      Mm-hmm.

    8. DK

      And at some point, John Malone, I think, had control of QVC, and Barry got the job to run QVC and have control because he wanted to be his own boss.

    9. DR

      Right.

    10. DK

      And who can blame him for that?

    11. BG

      God, to be in the room with those two characters as they're-

    12. DK

      Oh, yeah

    13. BG

      ... negotiating.

    14. DK

      It was golden-

    15. BG

      [laughing]

    16. DK

      ... for a, a kid like me. And so at the time, Sumner Redstone, who was running Viacom, had come to an agreement to buy Paramount Pictures, which was Barry's old home.

    17. BG

      Hmm.

    18. DK

      And Barry thought that he was getting a steal, so he decided to go after Paramount in a hostile tender offer, to come in as kind of a third-party bidder.

    19. BG

      Hmm.

    20. DK

      And it was a huge move because Paramount was bigger than QVC, you know, so it was like the minnow-

    21. BG

      Swallowing the whale.

    22. DK

      Yeah, swallowing the whale.

    23. BG

      Yeah.

    24. DR

      It's like, uh-

    25. BG

      Cap Cities.

    26. DR

      Cap Cities, yeah.

    27. DK

      Exactly. Exactly. And, uh, I was the analyst on the deal, and it, it was a whole kind of bidding process. You know, Barry would bid, and then Redstone would bid up, et cetera. It was multiple steps. There was a, a big court case that was pretty important in terms of did Barry have the right to come in and actually bid on this thing and break apart a negotiated deal? The person who I worked for, the VP, et cetera, she got sick, and so I had to kind of step up and work with Barry directly, like, making these pitches to Barry. And I still-

    28. DR

      You're a couple years out of college at this point?

    29. DK

      I was, like, two, three years out of college. And at some point, Barry's like... You know, there are all these complicated numbers that you put together, and Barry wanted to know, like, "Who is the person running these numbers?" And he's like, "I wanna talk to the person running the numbers." Herbert Allen comes, and he's like, "Print out your model. Barry wants to talk." [laughing]

    30. DR

      [laughing]

  5. 13:3719:25

    Career philosophy: luck, openness, and not overplanning

    1. BG

      How did you find your way to Allen & Company? I know I'm just, like, pulling at threads, going backwards here, but-

    2. DK

      Yeah. Uh, I was... Um, it was a very considered decision, which was I studied engineering in school, and I actually had a engineering management, um, job lined up at a, at a paint factory.

    3. BG

      [chuckles]

    4. DK

      And then I fell in love with a commodity trader in New York City-

    5. BG

      Hmm.

    6. DK

      ... and at the time I'm like: I need a job in New York City. What kind of job can I get? And it was investment banking. My brother worked there, uh-

    7. BG

      Still works there, right?

    8. DK

      Uh, still works there. So I got the job and chased the woman of my dreams and broke up with her six months later, but, you know, I got a job at Allen & Company- [laughing]

    9. BG

      [laughing]

    10. DK

      ... a pretty cool career.

    11. BG

      Well, I- have you written her a thank you note? 'Cause you'd be running a paint factory otherwise.

    12. DK

      I have not. That's a very good point. I owe it all to her.

    13. BG

      But based on observing you and your history and everyone else in your family, it would become, like, a paint factory that would then, like-

    14. DK

      [chuckles]

    15. BG

      ... buy all the other paint factories-

    16. DK

      Yeah

    17. BG

      ... and then expand up and down the stack and then figure out how to add, like, 15 other businesses, and it would become this, like, beautiful conglomeration of something. I don't know.

    18. DK

      You know, you could be right, or I could have just gotten sh- totally lucky by falling into Allen & Company. I really do think it was just things came together, and everyone's career who's successful, it's a combination of luck and opportunity and taking advantage of the opportunity, and I think I just got lucky.

    19. BG

      So that's, like, a nice thing to say. There are a lot of other people that could have lucked their way into an Allen & Company job and then not turned it into an incredible performance with one of the most important people where your model needs to hold weight, which is Barry Diller, in that exact crucible moment in time. What do you say to young people when they sort of ask you this question about how much does luck have to do with it, and how should I be the most prepared, and how can I seize opportunities when they come up?

    20. DK

      I think I always tell people that the most common mistake that I see in young people is that they overplan their career. And like, "Oh, I wanna do X, or I wanna be vice president, or I wanna make so much money by a certain time." And when you overplan your career, you know, there, there's this human bias, which is to look for signal that agrees with the plan that you have and ignore e- everything else that doesn't agree with it. So my advice for young people is, like, "Don't overplan." You never know what opportunities are gonna come up. I planned to stay at Allen & Company my whole life. It was my place. My brother wound up being there. But being open to possibilities, being open to opportunities, and then when you get that opportunity, going all in. You know, like, it's just... Don't hedge. If you're gonna be in something, go all in and do what's required of you and then, like, 50% more. Like, blow people away. Uh, and then, you know, tomorrow, maybe something else comes up, and, and you'll get there, but, like, while you're in, you go all in, but at the same time, like, keep your eyes open 'cause you never know.

    21. DR

      All right, listeners, for our first sponsor of this episode, we have a new member of the Acquired family that I am very excited about, Common Room. Common Room is the platform that ties community-led growth and product-led growth to revenue.

    22. BG

      Yes. Common Room solves a problem that tons of businesses have in this modern era. Let's say you have a free trial or a freemium product. Inevitably, you get a bunch of users posting on LinkedIn, GitHub, Slack, Discord, communities everywhere, for guidance and problem-solving about your product. And then, of course, on the other side of the house, you also have a CRM to understand interactions that your team actually has with customers. But none of these systems tie together, and that's where Common Room comes in. Common Room captures what is happening across your broader community and marries it with customer data from a HubSpot or a Salesforce and product data in your data warehouse, like Snowflake, so you can see it all in one place. And not only that, Common Room unifies customer identity across all these channels. So you can see, for instance, that that VP buyer at your highest priority account posted three times in your Slack community last week after your team resolved a GitHub issue for an engineer at the same account who recently signed up for your free trial. Who wouldn't wanna know that?

    23. DR

      Yes, I actually have a very fun personal story, too, to share about Common Room. After I stopped being a full-time VC to focus on Acquired, I didn't really think I was ever gonna invest again professionally, and then Linda, Common Room's founder and CEO, who's been a longtime friend, called me up, said she was starting a new company. She wanted me to be her first angel investor. Fast-forward and Common Room is now, I think, the single highest-returning investment that I have ever made, [chuckles] professionally or as an angel. They've now raised over $55 million from top firms like Madrona, Index, Greylock, and honestly, it gave me the confidence and conviction to then go start Kindergarten Ventures, where Nat and I have now raised and deployed almost $30 million. It's been so awesome just watching Common Room take off. Even in the past year, they went from a beta product to-... frankly, one of the most impressive customer rosters I've ever seen. They have the best product-led growth companies like Airtable, Atlassian, Asana, Figma, Notion, Webflow. They have developer-led companies like Snowflake, Databricks, Statsig, Replit, GitLab. These are all Common Room customers, as are a ton more companies.

    24. BG

      And it's a great Seattle success story. So if your go-to-market motion needs greater insight into who is talking about your product and what they are saying, and frankly, as you can tell from Common Room's customer list, basically every modern company does, head on over to commonroom.io/acquired for a twenty percent discount off their team plan for 2023, or when you get in touch with them, just tell them that Ben and David sent you. All right, so we're gonna catch back up to that Expedia era. Thirteen years,

  6. 19:2522:14

    Lessons from Booking vs. Expedia—then applied to Uber’s marketplace

    1. BG

      you have a pretty wild competition with Booking.com.

    2. DK

      Mm-hmm.

    3. BG

      And I think you learn a lot of lessons from watching Booking just crush it: top line, profit margins, uh, rate of expansion, everything about it. Booking built a hell of a company.

    4. DK

      Incredible.

    5. BG

      When you're on the Expedia side of things, and then you get a fresh start at Uber, how do you take those lessons with you, and what did you learn?

    6. DK

      God, I learned so much. Um, Booking was an execution machine, and their focus, when we talked about focus, was hotels, hotels, hotels. And Expedia was much more... It started with air, right? And hotels was, to some extent, secondary. And so I think one of the lessons is like, hey, go after the larger market, and if you're a marketplace business, go after fragmentation of supply, which is, if you think about hotels, there are so many more hotels in the world than there are airlines. So I think they focused completely in the right area and built a global business first, uh, and just were an absolute execution machine. The other area was that Expedia was probably more focused on building demand, kind of consumer demand, brand, et cetera. Booking was more supply-led, and-

    7. DR

      Especially in the States, nobody knew what Booking was.

    8. DK

      Totally, totally. But it's like, for, for them, it was about building up the hotel supply, and as you built up the hotel supply, every hotel became another piece of data that you could market through Google or metasearch.

    9. DR

      Mm-hmm.

    10. DK

      And if you have a hundred hotels in a market, and you expand that to two hundred hotels in the market, that market is also gonna convert better.

    11. BG

      Hmm.

    12. DK

      So not only do you build kind of a new segment of demand, but then if there's a search for, you know, hotel in Nice, Nice becomes a better product, can convert more. If it can convert more, you can get more traffic from Google, et cetera. They play that optimization game like no one else.

    13. BG

      Hmm.

    14. DK

      And for me, the biggest lesson as I came to Uber was Uber's a marketplace business, very, very fragmented supply base, right? It's five point six million drivers and couriers who are earning on our platform.

    15. DR

      And a few million restaurants?

    16. DK

      Yeah, close to a million restaurants. And for us, our growth is also supply-led. So if you think about post-pandemic and one of the reasons why I think generally we're doing really well and gaining a bunch of category share versus Lyft coming out of the pandemic, was because we really focused on bringing those drivers back to the platform, building our service, et cetera, and it was a supply-led way of building the business, which definitely was a learning that I took from Booking.com.

  7. 22:1427:39

    Making the Uber flywheel real: merging teams, internal ‘media,’ and compounding

    1. DR

      With Booking, like, you can build a market, uh, of a, say, a geography for hotels, and then use that to build a vertical. You can do the same thing at Uber in a way that your competitors on both sides of the business can't, right? Because you can cross-market-

    2. DK

      Exactly

    3. DR

      ... rides and Eats.

    4. DK

      Exactly. And especially in the US, there's a much more crossover between couriers who deliver food and then drivers who drive people. There's a much larger crossover, and we can actually use Eats almost as a recruitment tool. In that moment when someone says, "I am interested in earning money, you know, gig money, on-demand, et cetera, with all the flexibility, freedom, et cetera," the faster you can get that person earning money, the higher the conversion rate. And because of Eats, you don't need to get your car inspected. You know, there's a lot of steps, additional steps, background check, et cetera, that's required for driving. Those steps don't necessarily need to be completed to deliver food. You can get people into, uh, the food ecosystem, they can start earning on the Uber platform, and then you can upsell them into additional opportunities, driving people, shopping, et cetera. It, it's a structural recruitment advantage we have in terms of building up supply, and as you build up the supply, the liquidity in the marketplace gets better, you know, surge come down, pricing gets better, ETA gets better, your ability to price gets better, and the demand shows up to some extent.

    5. DR

      So everything you just said, that's always been, like, the, the story-

    6. DK

      Yeah

    7. DR

      ... right?

    8. DK

      Yeah.

    9. DR

      It seems like in the past few years, though, especially relative to your competitors, it's actually become more of a reality, and I'm curious, maybe you talked about Booking being execution machines. [chuckles] Like, what, what does the Uber execution machine look like since the pandemic to maybe make that more of a reality?

    10. DK

      Well, I think that there's always a delay between inputs and outputs, right? Which is you, you can start changing the inputs in terms of how you build a system, et cetera. It takes a while for the outputs to become emergent. We did take a big step post-pandemic, once Eats got to size, to merge all the teams together, the technical teams together, the marketplace teams together, uh, single earner team, et cetera. When Eats was small-... it needed its own dedicated teams, because if you had one team doing rides and Eats, like, all the attention would go to rides. Once we combined the teams, that allowed, you know, one technical team to really focus on the demand side. Eats is the recipient. You know, so the rides business has most of the audience, and generally, we move more people from rides to Eats. So it's a, it's a almost free customer acquisition tool for, for Eats.

    11. BG

      It's your largest customer acquisition channel for Eats, right?

    12. DK

      Yeah, we, we get more new customers from rides than we do from Google, Meta, Instagram, you know, all of these other channels combined.

    13. SP

      It's pretty nice to own your own media.

    14. DK

      It's awesome, yeah!

    15. BG

      It's crazy.

    16. DK

      At, at a quarter of the cost. So it's like, it's, it's a proprietary channel, and it's cheaper, and then on the supply side-

    17. SP

      Do you, do you, like, charge internally for-

    18. DK

      Totally.

    19. SP

      [laughing] Oh, I love it.

    20. DK

      Oh, yeah, yeah, totally, totally.

    21. BG

      Well, it's an, it's an even advertising business, right?

    22. SP

      Yeah.

    23. BG

      So it's an ad unit like any other.

    24. DK

      Exactly, exactly. And, and so, and it-

    25. SP

      We're gonna have to start charging each other for-

    26. BG

      Stop

    27. SP

      ... plugs on the... Okay. [laughing]

    28. DK

      [laughing] We can tell you a little about our internal pricing mechanisms.

    29. SP

      [laughing]

    30. DK

      But, but, you know, all of it sounds great, but the fact is that whatever pixel that you put on the rides app to promote Eats is taking something away from the rides app, right? So there's, there's a bunch of experimentation that had to be done, which is what are the right surfaces, what are the right messages, how do you target it, how often do you target it, et cetera. So there's a, there's a, a bunch of machinery that you have to build to do this stuff successfully, and for the benefit that Eats gets to be significantly larger than the detriment that rides gets, and to not get in the way of the rides experience. You know, like, you don't wanna screw up that experience. So to the question of, like, why is it happening now? Is one, it looks great on paper, but then to build the machinery to actually do it effectively takes time. And then, you know, if Eats has this new customer acquisition, uh, source, every year, new customers for Eats account for less than 10% of the business, of the overall business-

  8. 27:3935:28

    Pricing, labor, and the ‘invisible hand’: how Uber balances the marketplace

    1. SP

      Is it still that, um, supply acquisition cost is bigger than demand acquisition cost for you guys?

    2. DK

      Yes.

    3. SP

      Yeah.

    4. DK

      Yes. I mean, it, it, it is. We are a supply-led business at this point. Um, probably two years ago, we could have added, uh, 25% more drivers and couriers into the platform. They would all be, like, super busy instantly. Right now, our supply generally is growing faster than demand because it's catching up to demand, and the average driver who's on the platform is working more because the experience is better, earnings levels are, are, are pretty- are really good. So at this point, probably supply is still trailing demand by, you know, 5% or so, but the marketplace is now getting to a point where it's balanced. But the, it's that compounding that really starts working.

    5. BG

      I was reading through the most recent earnings, and you have a chart where on average, over the last five years or so, drivers make more money per hour.

    6. DK

      Mm-hmm.

    7. BG

      If we entered some economic environment where a whole bunch of people were out of work and they wanted to become Uber drivers, but that would make it so that the average earnings across the whole platform would plunge, 'cause you have a whole ton of new drivers coming on, would you guys sort of gate it and be like, "Hey, we wanna, like, make sure that w- we don't sort of flood the, the supply side of the marketplace?"

    8. DK

      No, uh, because one of our core philosophies is this is an open platform, and if your background check comes in okay, et cetera, then you can have access to earnings opportunities. That's a core belief for us. The economics take care of themselves, right? When you look at mid-cycle, long-cycle, if earnings come down on the platform, then it becomes a less attractive platform to drivers-

    9. BG

      Mm

    10. DK

      ... and they will do something else. There is this countercyclicality about our marketplace, which is during really good times, it becomes harder for us to recruit drivers, so the cost of supply goes up. So while revenue and gross bookings are growing and unit volumes are strong, our supply base becomes more expensive. During softer economic times, you get more drivers coming into the platform, ETAs come down, prices come down, the price becomes cheaper, so actually, our unit volumes accelerate. So if you look, like, our Q1 unit volumes, they grew 24% versus 19% in Q4.

    11. BG

      Mm.

    12. DK

      So we accelerated, you know, trip growth, which is not something that you see at our scale, but it's, it's some of this stuff working out.

    13. BG

      Right. So it's sort of the invisible hand of the market theory that sort of self-regulates this for you.

    14. DK

      Yeah, it's not a theory. It happens.

    15. BG

      Yeah, I guess like, yeah. [laughing]

    16. DK

      [laughing] It's, it's this very cool experiment.

    17. SP

      Yeah.

    18. BG

      Economists like to talk about, like, things in theory, but, like, you actually have a, one of the largest data sets in human history of, you know, people doing work and other people consuming services.

    19. DK

      Y- yeah, if you, if you ask our top economist at Uber, he would say that we actually don't control the price to the consumer, that it's actually the spot price for this kind of labor the marketplace sets based on the supply of labor coming in and the demand-... for transportation.

    20. DR

      Hmm.

    21. DK

      And so there's this, you know, people say, like, "Uber's setting prices?" He'd say, "We're not setting prices."

    22. DR

      Hmm.

    23. DK

      "The marketplace is setting its own price."

    24. BG

      So what do you do then? Like, you have to have some leverage at your disposal. You're getting a lot more profitable.

    25. DK

      Yes.

    26. BG

      I mean, certainly, I think in '20... Whenever we did the IPO episode, Uber had lost, like, close to $3 billion the year before going public.

    27. DR

      You said in the, in the episode that it was the most that a company had ever lost before going public in history. [chuckles]

    28. BG

      Yes.

    29. DR

      I don't know if that's true, but, uh-

    30. BG

      Well-

  9. 35:2838:31

    Uber’s true complexity vs. Expedia: multi-stakeholder, real-time operations

    1. DR

      How has the complexity of Uber relative to Expedia matched up with your expectations coming in?

    2. DK

      So there's complexity in terms of all of the stakeholders that you have to think about, and that's like... It's a difference between chess and, like, four-dimensional chess. It is like Expedia travel agency. You're bringing demand to your supply base, et cetera, and then you have to think about the travel ecosystem. But with Uber, Uber is, like, a incredibly important service to the cities of the world.

    3. DR

      And also, Expedia, you weren't providing the service.

    4. DK

      Yes.

    5. DR

      You were a-

    6. DK

      We, we were demand-

    7. DR

      A de- a marketplace layer

    8. DK

      ... aggregator. Exactly.

    9. DR

      You're not operating the airplanes. [chuckles]

    10. DK

      Exactly.

    11. DR

      You're not, you know, making up the hotel rooms.

    12. DK

      Exactly. You know, the drivers are providing the service, right? But it's... We're much more responsible end to end. But, you know, you're responsible for your customers. We have a very, very important responsibility to driver and courier community, these over 5 million people who are making an earning or making kind of a side earnings on, on Uber, and then the responsibility in terms of, like, regulators and governments, et cetera. That consideration set is, is just, it's so much bigger. So from that standpoint, it's-... tough, but also really interesting and satisfying in some ways. Um-

    13. DR

      Were you ready for it?

    14. DK

      Was I ready for it?

    15. DR

      Yeah.

    16. DK

      No. [laughing] I had no idea.

    17. DR

      Is this one of those-

    18. DK

      I had no idea

    19. DR

      ... like, y- if you knew, you wouldn't have done it, but now you've done it, and so all this value's been created and, like, great?

    20. DK

      I'm so glad I did it. It, it was a, a friend of mine was like, "Hey, are you having fun?" I'm like, "No, I'm not having fun." [laughing]

    21. DR

      [laughing]

    22. DK

      Like, I love it.

    23. DR

      Yeah, yeah.

    24. DK

      You know, like, the job is too hard-

    25. DR

      Yeah

    26. DK

      ... to, like... It's not fun, but it's so cool. It's such an interesting space. You really feel like you're having impact. Everyone at Uber, like, i- we always talk, like, you don't come to Uber for easy. Like, you don't come here for an easy job. It's complicated. It's hardcore. People work their asses off, but, like, you love it. And, and it's not fun. Like, it ain't fun, but people love being at the company. That's something I didn't know. And then, and then the, the dynamic real-time nature of the marketplace and how we balance the marketplace and the pricing, et cetera, i- is unique, right? It- it's Thursday night, there's a Taylor Swift concert. All hands on deck. We gotta figure things out. That operational nature, but how dynamic and fast it is.

    27. DR

      Does, uh, Uber HQ plan for Taylor concerts ahead of time-

    28. DK

      Uber-

    29. DR

      ... as they're happening?

    30. DK

      Yeah, I mean, Uber HQ doesn't, but there are ops teams on the ground.

  10. 38:3155:24

    How Dara became Uber CEO: headhunter call, Daniel Ek push, and Barry’s help

    1. BG

      So, uh, David asked this interesting question that I wanna dig a little bit deeper on, the, the were you ready for it. What kind of diligence did you get to do on the opportunity when this job came on the market in the national news in a very prominent way, in a very short time?

    2. DR

      Yeah, I wanna get a little-

    3. DK

      Yeah.

    4. DR

      Well, let's cover the... First, when did you first get contacted about it?

    5. DK

      Yeah, that's a good place to start.

    6. DR

      Like, how did you... How did you enter the Uber orbit?

    7. DK

      So, um, I was reading about it in the news, just like everyone else was, right? It was just all over the place, and it was, it was-

    8. DR

      Meg Whitman

    9. DK

      ... crazy.

    10. DR

      Jeff Immelt. It was a public, uh-

    11. DK

      Yeah, and also e- everything going on-

    12. DR

      Yeah

    13. DK

      ... and what led to it, you know, the, the, the battle between Travis and Benchmark and all that stuff, it was, it was fascinating as an observer. I never, ever, ever imagined that [chuckles] I would then play a part.

    14. DR

      [laughing]

    15. DK

      And a headhunter called me about this role, and I-

    16. BG

      So not a board member directly, a headhunter.

    17. DK

      Headhunter. Headhunter.

    18. BG

      Whoa!

    19. DR

      Wow.

    20. DK

      Headhunter called me. It was a structured process, and I'm like: No way. Like, uh, no thank you, goodbye.

    21. DR

      [chuckles] Happy in Seattle.

    22. DK

      And...

    23. DR

      Everything's great.

    24. DK

      Yeah, 13 years. I love working-

    25. BG

      I got my place on Wimby. [laughing]

    26. DK

      Yeah, [chuckles] I love working for Barry. Like, it was... I, I was good.

    27. DR

      This is fun. [laughing]

    28. DK

      Yeah, and then, and then we- [chuckles] Yeah, exactly. It was fun. And then I, I was at the Sun Valley Conference, the Allen & Company Sun Valley Conference, and, um, having drinks with Daniel Ek, and he's like, "Dara, you know, did you get the call from that headhunter about the Uber job? Uh, I think you'd be perfect for the job." And I didn't know where the headhunter, why the headhunter called. Turned out Daniel. I'm like, "Dude, why would I ever do that? Like, I'm happy. Like, why, why would I ever jump into that mess?"

    29. BG

      So Daniel gave the headhunter your number?

    30. DK

      Yes, [laughing] and, and I'm like, "No way."

  11. 55:2459:06

    Strategy at entry: not a grand vision—an operating plan to reach profitability

    1. BG

      What of today's strategy was in your pitch to the board when you were joining as CEO, and what is an emergent thing that's happened while you're in the seat?

    2. DK

      So the pitch to the board was really different in that it wasn't- [chuckles] ... about strategy.

    3. BG

      Huh.

    4. DK

      It was about operations and how you take the business to break even and profitability, et cetera, right? It was, it was presenting myself as a mature operator, and my track record at Expedia. I think now things have changed, which is we have become much more focused on those, on those three segments.

    5. BG

      Yeah.

    6. DK

      And if you look at rides, we have a number of growth bets, which is there's this base business, UberX, which is, like, gonna be 50% of our growth. Then about 15% of our growth are international countries where the business model as we had it wasn't legal. So the attitude at the time was, "Well, if our business model isn't legal, then, like, we're not coming in until we're invited in." And we took a different tack, which is, "Well, what business model is legal? And let's adjust our business model to the country versus have the country adjust to the business model."

    7. BG

      Mm.

    8. DK

      And once you're in, you, and you build trust within a country, and you build a voice, et cetera, maybe then the business model can change over a period to benefit, you know, drivers, couriers, et cetera. So like, we're in Germany, we're in Spain, we're in Japan, we're in Korea, we're in Turkey. There's a bunch of countries that we're expanding into with tweaks to the business model to make sure that we're expanding to, into those countries the right way. And then there's a whole host of new bets that we're making in terms of transportation: Taxi, which is huge, low-cost, hailables, two-wheelers, three-wheelers, Uber for Business, health, uh, transportation, um, all of these different segments. That whole kind of the new bets portfolio will be 35% of our growth.

    9. BG

      Mm.

    10. DK

      So if we do it right, we will... 50% of our growth will come from these new initiatives that really didn't exist. And then on the Eats side, obviously, it was about food and kind of the general expansion of that business, but it's really about getting into the other categories, getting into grocery, liquor, et cetera. And one of the parts that I'm super excited about is we've always had kind of, um, call it an integrated offering. If you think about Eats, there's a marketplace offering. You come to Uber Eats, and Eats is bringing you demand, and then there's the fulfillment of that demand, right? The, my bringing wine here and- [laughing] ... delivering it, right?

    11. DR

      Thank you.

    12. DK

      That is-

    13. DR

      This is delicious, by the way.

    14. DK

      That has nothing to do with demand necessarily, but it's fulfillment.

    15. DR

      Yeah, these are two separate businesses that got stapled together.

    16. DK

      Exactly. So, so we have now we're separating the tech stack.

    17. DR

      Mm.

    18. DK

      Right? So that now we can offer- we can go to merchants and say, "If you want marketplace, great, but if you want fulfillment, we can offer you fulfillment in a separable way." So, for example, Walmart isn't in our marketplace, because they're Walmart, they have an incredible brand, et cetera, but they use our fulfillment services. And more and more, that, our vision is we essentially want the local grocer to out-Amazon Amazon. Like, every single local business can deliver same day, which is better the next day. Um, if we can connect that to marketplace, that's great, but that can also be a separate part of our business that can, uh, grow and thrive.

    19. DR

      It's so funny how much of this, you know, goes back to, like, the original 10 years ago, 15 years ago vision for Uber. It just takes so long to realize these things.

    20. DK

      It does. I mean, the vision-

    21. DR

      Like, it's complex. Like-

    22. DK

      It, it looks great on paper-

    23. DR

      Yeah

    24. DK

      ... and then, you know, real life is a lot more difficult, right?

  12. 59:061:02:04

    Incumbent shift: partnering with taxis and adapting the product to old workflows

    1. BG

      Are there activities that you've sort of thought about w- where you, you used to need to do something different or counterposition the market in order to be successful, where now you sort of look around, and you're like, "Eh, actually, in this area, we're the incumbent, so there's a different strategy that we need to lean into as an incumbent"?

    2. DK

      Our working with taxis was, was an interesting twist-

    3. BG

      Mm.

    4. DK

      Right? Which is to some extent, they have been definitionally the competition, or we have been the competition or the, um, challenger to those incumbents. Um, at some point, we became much bigger than taxi, but in the end, if you remove yourself from the emotions, et cetera, and, you know, we're competing against X or Y, we're in the job of wiring up, you know, vehicles and drivers who wanna drive people to places, and that includes taxi. Like, there are four and a half million of them, and if you take the hypothesis, which is the, the days of old, where you wave your arm to, you know, wave a taxi down, like, things are, are changing, then it was a move that was obvious. But at the same time, like, the beauty of Uber is when you get into the actual challenges, like, for example, we, we launched Taxi, and the way that we match generally Uber is one-to-one. So you, uh, hail for an Uber, we will match you, we'll make an offer to a specific driver, driver says yes, driver comes pick you up, et cetera. What we found in taxi markets is that when we made the one-to-one match, if we weren't integrated into the taxi meter, and that's something that we'll build over a period of time, the taxi might be full, but the acceptance rate of the taxis was much, much lower, and we didn't know why. And if the acceptance rate is lower, you might wait for a long time to get matched, 'cause we're gonna come, send offer, offer, offer, offer before you get a match. So the team built a technology blast dispatch, which is instead of a one-to-one match, it's a, you know, we'll make a dispatch to 10 different taxis. One of them accepts.

    5. DR

      This is [chuckles] just like the old taxi dispatch system.

    6. DK

      Totally.

    7. DR

      [chuckles] Literally.

    8. DK

      Totally. Like, who's... You know, there's a pickup on 54 Leonard Street-

    9. DR

      Yeah, yeah, yeah [chuckles]

    10. DK

      ... and someone says, Joey says, "Yes."

    11. DR

      I got that one. [chuckles]

    12. DK

      Right? Yeah, I got that one.

    13. DR

      [laughing]

    14. DK

      So, like, what's, what's old becomes new-

    15. DR

      Mm

    16. DK

      ... what's new becomes old. But it- what's been interesting is there's a simple idea-... but then building out the tech infrastructure to be able to fit to that particular market becomes a challenge, but also it's an opportunity, which is now for some of our competitors to copy that. One is, it's taking a lot of tuning to actually get that experience to be excellent. Um, there are some markets where we're mixing demand. You know, you might, uh, click for an UberX, a taxi might show up, right?

    17. DR

      Mm.

    18. DK

      Is that a good thing? Is that a bad thing? It improves marketplace liquidity, and things that seem very simple on the surface to actually make the magic happen of pushing a button and a car shows up in five minutes and you get great service, it's actually pretty difficult tech to build on the ground. It's really cool.

  13. 1:02:041:13:27

    Rebuilding the shareholder base and the SoftBank governance reset

    1. DR

      That is cool. I have another, uh, sort of corporate structure question-

    2. DK

      Uh-oh. Okay

    3. DR

      ... that I'm, I'm curious about. I think you guys, between when you took the job and today, turned over basically the entire Uber shareholder base. I'm sure there's some people that still hold their shares from-

    4. DK

      Yeah, yeah

    5. DR

      ... those early days, but what is that like at the scale of a $70, $80 billion market cap company turning over a shareholder base in its entirety?

    6. DK

      Very painful. [laughing]

    7. DR

      [laughing]

    8. DK

      It was the displacement in terms of shareholders, it was tough, right? And, and there's a certain cohort of shareholders going after hypergrowth, et cetera, especially in this marketplace, where it's much more about disciplined growth, profitable growth, et cetera, that that changeover has been difficult. But we now have a set of shareholders, like the Fidelities of the world, Capital, Morgan Stanley, et cetera, that have the capacity to own a lot of shares, way more than they do today, and there's a consistency about it. As we keep delivering, they keep upping their stake, and we're now seeing a stock price that generally is, is working. But I'll tell you, when we're in the middle of it, like, it was, it was tough. You know, after the IPO, after the, uh, lock-up stage, Travis sold all his shares.

    9. DR

      Oof.

    10. DK

      And those days, like, those were not happy days.

    11. DR

      That was-

    12. DK

      I'll tell you

    13. DR

      ... what, probably s- 15% of the company?

    14. DK

      I don't remember if it was 15-

    15. DR

      Something like that

    16. DK

      ... it was a lot. Yeah.

    17. DR

      There are moments when you remember that stock prices are a function of supply and demand.

    18. DK

      Totally.

    19. DR

      And when 15% of a company's outstanding shares hit the market all at once, like, oof-

    20. DK

      Or 2%.

    21. DR

      Or 1%.

    22. DK

      Or 2%, yeah.

    23. DR

      Or what... Yeah, right, like that's-

    24. DK

      Yeah.

    25. DR

      Oof, wow!

    26. DK

      I mean, the, the, like, I, I think in hindsight, um, I think it was a good move by him because it created separation. He wanted to move on, and so I, in hindsight, I respect what he did, and in hindsight, like, I didn't see it at the time. I was, like, pissed, right?

    27. DR

      Like, dude, come on. [chuckles]

    28. DK

      And people were panicking, "Oh, my God, Travis is selling. What does that mean?" Et cetera. Like, and, and, you know, there's this... Everyone wants to create drama around Uber, so it- it's difficult as a leader to keep the team focused and believing-

    29. DR

      Right

    30. DK

      ... because it's very easy to keep score based on the stock price, and the stock price was def- definitely moving in the wrong direction. And Travis, y- you know, whether you liked him or not, you respect him. He's a really smart person, and he's the founder of the company. Like, that was a tough time. But I think we're now in a good place, which is the shareholding is moving from either some of the startup folks or hedge funds to fundamental long-only players, who hopefully they'll be shareholders for the next 10 years.

  14. 1:13:271:28:39

    Leadership in public: Dara’s Twitter style, NYT board lessons, and autonomy realism

    1. BG

      a free week trial that is coming up soon. So you can go to pitchbook.com/acquired to get all the details and just tell them that you heard about them from Ben and David at Acquired.... I'm very curious about how you operate your Twitter account. On the one extreme, there's like an Elon Musk type, uh, operating a Twitter account, where there's-

    2. DK

      There's only one Elon Musk type operating a Twitter [laughing]

    3. DR

      [laughing] Yeah.

    4. BG

      Like, there is no type.

    5. DK

      There are... Yeah. [chuckles] It, it's a singular point.

    6. BG

      There is one in, I don't know how many Mdaos they have, but one in some hundred million, uh, data point of tweeting whatever comes to your mind, no matter the consequences, and-

    7. DR

      So much so that he bought the company.

    8. BG

      Yes. And then on the complete other side, there's, like, Barack Obama and Tim Cook, and I'd say you're, like, one click in from the Barack Obama, Tim Cook. And I'm curious, like-

    9. DK

      I'm gonna consider that a compliment.

    10. BG

      Yeah. [laughing]

    11. DK

      Why, thank you. [laughing]

    12. BG

      Like, y- you definitely operate your public persona w- with sort of a head of state grace, and I'm curious if you ever think about letting it fly a little bit more, or do you have a full drafts folder? Like, how-

    13. DK

      [chuckles]

    14. BG

      Do you ever wish you could express yourself a little more?

    15. DK

      What- the, the what I really think-

    16. BG

      Yeah. [chuckles]

    17. DK

      ... uh, Twitter feed?

    18. BG

      Do you have a burner account? [laughing]

    19. DK

      [laughing] So I tweet mostly myself. There's some stuff that folks say, "We did this." The... It's, it's me. Like, I don't have someone running the account. And, you know, I mix it up with some personal stuff and then some business stuff 'cause, um, you wanna keep it entertaining, but at the same time, I'm not using Twitter to express myself. I'd rather have a long-form discussion like this. Like, this is, to me, much more interesting, and so Twitter, tweets can be taken out of context, et cetera. So, like, I'm, I'm, I'm not there to stir the pot.

    20. BG

      Right.

    21. DK

      Um, so maybe that's what comes out in terms of my Twitter persona. I'll, I'll take Obama-esque or Clinton-esque.

    22. DR

      Tim Cook, it works for him.

    23. DK

      Tim Cook. Yeah, like, that's, that's quite a compliment.

    24. BG

      All right, next, I'd c- ... We're kind of in, like, a lightning round here. So next random lightning round topic, you were on the board of The New York Times.

    25. DK

      Yes.

    26. BG

      What are some of your biggest learnings from being involved with that company?

    27. DK

      It was, um, definitely my favorite board to be on. It was a really interesting time at The New York Times because they were really becoming a top technical company in terms of being a publisher. Like, it's at a pretty extraordinary learning organization, and they wanted me as, like, the tech person, and I was coming from Expedia and, you know, optimization, all that stuff, and their capacity to learn... Like, super traditional company, capacity to learn was pretty awesome. Um, one of the fascinating parts about the company, and it's both a superpower or it could be a weakness, is total separation of Church and state in terms of content and business. Right? So, like, when I asked, "Well, what's the cost of certain kinds of content, and then how much traffic? You know, can we have the connection between cost of content and traffic?" It was like: "No, you cannot ask that question-

    28. BG

      Huh

    29. DK

      ... because the content is separate." So it's, it's just a fascinating organization, and the bet that they made on subscriptions was amazing. Um, it was not obvious, because the advertising business was much bigger at the time, but it was an enterprise bet based on a core identity of the company, which is, "We believe in quality content." And I thought that was one of the most impressive bets, because it was totally not obvious at the time. Like, all, every single news organization, et cetera, was advertising, advertising. This is the BuzzFeed days, right? It was quick content, et cetera. But I, I think that w- the bet that they made in quality was very much a bet on, uh, their identity that wasn't backed up by data and certainly wasn't backed up by their financials. But the company went all in, and, uh, they've really benefited.

    30. BG

      Do you think that could have happened in a company that wasn't family-controlled? Like, did that have something to do with how they could make a bet like that without the data-

  15. 1:28:391:37:40

    Closing message: building the world’s best earner platform with higher duty of care

    1. BG

      Cool. Well, the last segment that I have here is giving you the floor. You know, we're at the end of a long-form podcast.

    2. DK

      Mm-hmm.

    3. BG

      So anybody that's still listening appreciates nuance.

    4. DK

      [chuckles]

    5. BG

      And so if there's something that you feel is often misunderstood or that you wanna say to people that are willing to let a long-form argument soak in, what do you think is misunderstood about the company or you or the industry or this time that we're in right now? Really anything you wanna talk about.

    6. DK

      I don't know if it's m- misunderstood, but, but it's certainly something that- that's top of mind for us, is that w-we ultimately, the future of the business as it stands now, depends on our building the best platform for earners, and it goes to like the take rate, right? If the take rate goes up too much, then we're taking too much of the service, et cetera. A- and the fact is that I think Uber was guilty of taking earners for granted because when I first came in, and for much of the company, like we were in a state of oversupply. We had too many drivers. It goes-- and instead of gating them, et cetera, we just didn't really invest in the driver experience and the courier experience the way that we should've. And then the way that we organized the company around the earner experience w-was pretty standard in terms of a B2C business, right? There's a team, you know, there's a team that runs the Uber app, there's a team that runs the Eats app, and the team that runs the Driver app, and you do all the typical stuff, which is analytics and measurements and A/B test, et cetera, in order to optimize throughput in the marketplace, et cetera. But like as we step back, you know, we don't A/B test what the 401k match should be for employees, right? Like, it was equivalent. Some of the experimentation that we were doing on the earner side is like, you know, yeah, should we match a three percent or six percent? And let's look at employee turnover. Cool experiment, maybe you could optimize, but when you're building a product that people are making a living off of or are earning money that they have to earn with, there's a different duty of care.

    7. BG

      Mm.

    8. DK

      And the amount of time that they're spending on the app, most of Uber employees, myself too, like, order rides all the time, order Eats all the time, you know, you get in, get out, et cetera, but a driver will be spending four hours, five hours, six hours with the app every single day. So the consequence of like all this coming together and our building for drivers, the way that we essentially build for consumers, which is like pretty cool and techy, et cetera, you know, one is like the P95 experience. Usually, like you build... You don't look at P50 'cause averages lie, and then you look at P95, well, that's the worst experience. Well-

    9. DR

      The probability percentages.

    10. DK

      Yeah, the probability percentages. You know, drivers, an average driver who's driving a week, experience like a P95 circumstance every single week, multiple times a week, 'cause they spend a lot more time on the app.

    11. BG

      Mm.

    12. DK

      So there's been a pretty important culture change of the company, which is like higher duty of care, actually slowing down in terms of how we build for earners, being a lot more humble, listening to them, their experience, et cetera.... the fact is that when you have five point six million earners on the platform, there's this marketplace which is, it works for some earners, and it doesn't, right? So there's always gonna be ten percent, which is like half a million people, who are not happy with the experience, but we've gotta make sure that ninety percent are, and we're getting more, uh, people who like the experience into the platform. But because of where we came from, it's actually pretty new muscle for us to, like, build this earner experience. And, and I do think, like, as I step back, and I think about, like, what am I gonna be proud of at the company? And, like, there's a lot to be proud of in terms of turning around the business and, like, the team that we built and the service that we built. I think there's this sense, which is like tech is out of touch with the real world, and it's a lot like tech is, you know, you're building for the virtual world. And, and Uber is unique in that it's a technology company that, like, built for the real world, and the impact that we have, especially as it relates to earners, is like, it's real people. And so what I would be most proud of, one is there's a practical reality, which is if we build a company that is-- has the best product and experience for earners, we're gonna win long term.

    13. DR

      Yep.

    14. DK

      But if we're that technology company that's, like, very much connected, not with the elite, but with, you know, an earner base and the broad population, not just in San Francisco, but all over the world, like, that, that's a company to be proud of. But at the same time, it's like we-- I think the, the muscle we've been developing in the last two to three years, we have a long way to go.

    15. DR

      Is Uber the largest earner platform in the world?

    16. DK

      Yeah, I think we're the largest source of work anywhere by far, and growing pretty fast.

    17. BG

      That's a crazy statement.

    18. DR

      Yeah.

    19. DK

      Yeah.

    20. BG

      'Cause the largest companies who-- like, even if, if you just look at employees-

    21. DR

      Walmart

    22. BG

      ... companies that employ people employ max, like, two million?

    23. DR

      Max, yeah.

    24. DK

      Yeah.

    25. BG

      And Uber has how many earners on the platform?

    26. DK

      Five point six million, uh, you know, as of the last quarter. It's growing.

    27. BG

      What is the-

    28. DK

      That's a lot of earners.

    29. BG

      What does the federal government employ? It's, like, on par with... It's gotta be on par with that.

    30. DK

      Now, a lot-- the vast majority are-

Episode duration: 1:37:40

Install uListen for AI-powered chat & search across the full episode — Get Full Transcript

Transcript of episode HIzlvDHem0A

Get more out of YouTube videos.

High quality summaries for YouTube videos. Accurate transcripts to search & find moments. Powered by ChatGPT & Claude AI.