Skip to content
AnthropicAnthropic

Dispatches from Iceland

In late 2025, Iceland’s government launched one of the world’s first national AI education pilots, giving teachers who volunteered access to AI tools. We visited Iceland to find out how people are thinking about AI. More information about the pilot: https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-and-iceland-announce-one-of-the-world-s-first-national-ai-education-pilots

Aug 10, 20268mWatch on YouTube ↗

At a glance

WHAT IT’S REALLY ABOUT

Icelanders debate AI in schools, work, and everyday life

  1. Students describe uncertainty about whether AI is “good or bad,” while noting that it is already widely used and hard to police in schools.
  2. Teachers and school leaders frame AI as a “tsunami of change,” arguing educators and students must redesign learning rather than pretend AI isn’t present.
  3. Educators involved in a pilot program describe relearning their craft—using AI to build new materials and even games, but acknowledging it doesn’t currently save time because teaching must be reworked.
  4. Vocational programs emphasize pragmatic benefits: AI speeds up producing quality drawings and interactive materials, helping people work faster and better.
  5. Several voices warn against “AI slop” and shortcutting learning, advocating an approach where AI supports understanding and inspiration rather than replacing student work.

IDEAS WORTH REMEMBERING

5 ideas

Ignoring AI in education is already failing.

Multiple speakers describe a tacit dynamic where students use AI and some teachers avoid acknowledging it; the transcript suggests this mismatch creates distrust and ineffective enforcement.

AI adoption requires rethinking teaching, not just adding a tool.

Teachers describe becoming “students” again and investing effort to change what they teach, implying the biggest work is redesigning assignments and learning goals for an AI-available world.

AI can accelerate vocational-quality outputs when used as a productivity tool.

In vocational settings, AI is framed as a way to produce drawings and interactive materials faster, aligning with a culture of efficiency and practical problem-solving.

The highest-risk misuse is substituting AI for learning, not using it at all.

Students and parents observe learners jumping straight to AI instead of engaging with books and teacher-provided materials, which can reduce independent thinking and skill-building.

A constructive norm is “AI as tutor,” not “AI as doer.”

One student proposes using AI to get started, find sources, and clarify concepts—while rejecting end-to-end answer generation for tests or projects.

WORDS WORTH SAVING

5 quotes

So it's kind of like this, we're trying to hide it, he's trying to not know about it, but everyone knows it's there and knows it's being used.

Unknown

The current generation of both educators and students, they are in the same tsunami of change, so we have to find out new ways of doing things.

Unknown

AI helps me quite often when I'm studying because it helps me understand what I'm doing, but I think the role of a teacher is to inspire students and that's something that AI does not have.

Unknown

People aren't using it to help other people. They're just using it to generate AI slop.

Unknown

We live in just darkness, so I think you just have to be optimistic or you just get depressed.

Unknown

Cheating and academic integrity concernsTeachers “looking the other way” vs adopting AICurriculum redesign and pilot programsAI as a learning aid vs answer machineVocational education productivity gainsCreativity, motivation, and human inspirationParenting boundaries and student overreliance

High quality AI-generated summary created from speaker-labeled transcript.

Get more out of YouTube videos.

High quality summaries for YouTube videos. Accurate transcripts to search & find moments. Powered by ChatGPT & Claude AI.