Skip to content

By playing, you agree to uListen's Terms and Privacy Policy and YouTube's Terms of Service.

BG2 PodBG2 Pod

The SpaceX IPO, Fable 5, AI Capex Update & Market Check w/ Gavin Baker, Andrew Fox & Clark Tang

Brad Gerstner sits down with Gavin Baker and Andrew Fox of Atreides Management, alongside Altimeter partner Clark Tang, to break down one of the biggest questions in tech and markets: how should investors think about the SpaceX IPO?

Brad GerstnerhostGavin BakerguestClark Tangguest
Jun 11, 20261h 20mWatch on YouTube

Summaries, chapters, transcripts, and FAQs on this page are made by uListen, not YouTube.

Great conversations run long. Their best ideas don't have to.

uListen is free on iPhone, iPad, Android, Chrome, and Claude.

See how

Transcript

  1. 0:00 – 0:40

    Intro

    1. BG

      And I think we're all pretty AI pilled. And if you're AI pilled, that means we gotta build a lot more compute than the world thinks, and that these models are gonna be a lot more valuable than people think. You combine that with their core business, I don't know another entrepreneur or another business that's a better bet on the future, right, than SpaceX. And so I think for most institutional investors, it's a must-buy, a must-own. It's set it and forget it, right, in order to have a, a, a real bet on both the space and the AI future.

  2. 0:40 – 3:05

    Intro — SpaceX IPO in Two Days, Mythos Launches, Taiwan Takeaways

    1. BG

      All right. Here we go. Early morning, Silicon Valley. BG2 is back. We're chopping it up on all things tech and markets. To do that, I have none other than GB in the house, Gavin Baker from Atreides. He's brought his main guy, Andrew Fox, and of course, I had to draft Clark Tang into the mix, my partner, um, to ta- to talk about some of the big questions of the day. You know, how should we be thinking about the SpaceX IPO? You know, what are the big levers? There are big numbers out there for what's gonna happen over the course of the next few years. So let's break that down a bit. He- help simplify it for folks. Uh, Mythos launched yesterday. I wanna talk a little bit about, like, who's up, who's down in the race for super intelligence. Where are we? What did we learn with the Mythos launch? And Clark was in, uh, in, in Taiwan last week, um, with Jensen at Computex and GTC. So what was our takeaway there? What's going on with GPUs memory? Where are the bottlenecks, and where do we go from here? To start everything off, um, you know, maybe just kick it over to you, Gavin, talking about the SpaceX IPO. The IPO is in two days. Uh, you're a big shareholder. Congratulations. We're also a shareholder. Uh, you know, we also be- expect to be buying in the IPO. The Wall Street Journal's reporting, um, you know, that Goldman Sachs are both saying 160 billion in revenue in 2028. Um, we know that the IPO is $135 a share, 1.77 trillion. Um, so when we think about kind of what the big levers are, there are so many moving parts in this IPO. Um, nobody's better than you at just breaking it down, simplifying it. What are the key levers that we ought to be thinking about, that you're thinking about over the course of the next few years?

    2. GB

      Sure. Um, so great to be here. Thank you for having me. I thought we were gonna call it B- BGGB, but-

    3. BG

      [laughs]

    4. GB

      B- but we can stick with BG2. I'm in your house.

    5. BG

      Hey, hey, hey.

    6. GB

      That's okay.

    7. BG

      All subject to revision.

    8. GB

      That's okay. [laughs] That's okay. So I think there's two big levers or variables that I think people should focus on, and, you know, I'm not gonna comment on where I think, um, those variables go. But one is, um, you guys have this chart. Um, did you, did you post this on X?

    9. SP

      I did. I did before, and then we also included a new addition with, uh, xAI's new deals as well.

    10. GB

      Yeah.

    11. SP

      Yeah.

    12. GB

      So Clark, who I've known for many years-

    13. SP

      [laughs]

    14. GB

      Um, uh, made a, did a great analysis here, and he shows that xAI's deal, um, with Google for

  3. 3:05 – 13:28

    xAI's Google & Anthropic Deals: Highest Operating Profit Per Gigawatt

    1. GB

      cloud computing, uh, generates more operating profit per gigawatt, um, than Anthropic, than Meta, than Google, than OpenAI. Uh, their deal, um, actually with, uh, Anthropic also generates probably more operating profit than anyone but, um, Anthropic. And so, you know, um, the, your, your colleague at Altimeter, Freyja, also she calculated a 55% IRR-

    2. BG

      Mm-hmm

    3. GB

      ... on Colossus-1.

    4. BG

      Mm-hmm.

    5. GB

      You know, if you can borrow money at 6, 7, 8% and invest in something with a 55% IRR, I'm not the most sophisticated thinker, but that math maths.

    6. BG

      Right.

    7. SP

      [laughs]

    8. GB

      And so I think the most important variable, one of the two most important, is how quickly they bring on terrestrial data centers.

    9. BG

      Mm-hmm.

    10. GB

      We do know from Jensen that, uh, Elon brings data centers up faster than anyone, 122 days. Speed is literally cost.

    11. BG

      Right.

    12. GB

      'Cause every day you're paying electricians and plumbers. That's cost. Um, and they're now monetizing them at arguably the highest rate.

    13. BG

      Mm.

    14. GB

      And so I think, you know, everybody should run their own math on that, but that is a massive variable.

    15. BG

      Yes.

    16. GB

      Um, truly massive variable. The second thing is, you know, we have a chart, um, and it's wildly out of date now.

    17. BG

      [laughs]

    18. GB

      It's kind of freaking amazing. This chart is, I think ... Is this chart from 10 days ago? But, um, in like the 10 or 12 days since this chart, since we made this chart, which shows the Pareto curves for Opus 4.7 for coding, for Codex from OpenAI, um, and now we've had Opus 4.8. It was already out of date.

    19. BG

      [laughs]

    20. GB

      And now we have Fable-

    21. BG

      Totally

    22. GB

      ... and Mythos, which is freaking wild. In 10 days-

    23. BG

      Yes

    24. GB

      ... like, we would've had to update the chart twice.

    25. BG

      Right.

    26. GB

      Um, but what the Pareto curve sh- shows is how much intelligence you can get for a given amount of cost. And I do think being all revenue will accrue to the Pareto curve. All-

    27. BG

      Right

    28. GB

      ... at least kind of frontier model revenue will accrue to the Pareto curve. And this is Pareto curve for co- coding. And what I think is so impressive is that, um, you could see in the chart that Composer 2 was Pareto dominant, um, or, you know, at, at the lowest level of intelligence with very little training.

    29. BG

      Right.

    30. GB

      This just reflects, and I know you know Cursor well, and I think you know Cursor a shitload better than I do. A vast amount better than I do.

  4. 13:28 – 19:08

    "Elon Web Services" — Nobody Had AI Compute in the SpaceX Model

    1. GB

      cheaper.

    2. BG

      Um, Clark, I would say probably the biggest surprise of the last six, six weeks-

    3. SP

      Mm

    4. BG

      ... uh, is that Elon, you know, we talked about it on the All In podcast. We called it EWS, Elon Web Services.

    5. SP

      [laughs]

    6. BG

      Right? That, that he struck these huge deals with Anthropic and Google. I don't even think people were thinking about SpaceX in the AI compute game, right? We ... If you looked at the models as of a few months ago, it was connectivity, so Starlink, and then it was x.AI, the model.

    7. SP

      Mm.

    8. BG

      But this whole category of taking all of this compute, which he's uniquely good at standing up, right, and then reselling it in a way that's highly profitable was not in a lot of people's forecasts. Now it's a major component of the forecast. You know, you and I did this podcast with Jensen-

    9. SP

      Mm-hmm

    10. BG

      ... where Jensen said Elon is an N of one.

    11. SP

      What they achieved is, is singular.

    12. BG

      Right.

    13. SP

      Never been done before. Just to put it in perspective, 100,000 GPUs, that's, you know, easily the fastest supercomputer on the planet. That's one cluster. Um, a supercomputer, uh, that you would build would take normally three years to plan.

    14. BG

      Right.

    15. SP

      And then they deliver the equipment, and it takes one year to get it all working.

    16. BG

      Yes.

    17. SP

      We're talking about 19 days.

    18. BG

      Wow. N of one is right. Elon is an N of one. And his ability to secure supply, stand up the supply, you know, deploy it in a way that's, uh, you know, coherent and effective for both himself and I guess now for others. So walk us through kind of that. It looks to me, again, like this is a major component of the revenue story.

    19. SP

      Totally. I mean, so we, we were all at the MacroHard data center, and it was just very evident the amount of engineering that was, that had gone into building these sites. Um, you know, people always talk about Google and their ability to, to build a TPU and sell the TPU to Anthropic to generate revenues for AI. I think it's a pretty similar dynamic here with Elon able to secure power, uh, build these sites faster than anyone else, and also be able now to monetize it to, um, to the, this massive AI market that's ahead of us. Um, if you look at the, the relationships that he's forged with a lot of his suppliers, you know, be it Jensen, be it, you know, all of these different, um, different sites that actually want xAI as a tenant, um, his a- his ability to finance these deals at, at very attractive, uh, financing rates relative to a lot of the other players in, in the space, you know, these are advantages that compound over time. And when you've built the credibility to stand up these sites and monetize at these levels, um, you know, it's v- it's actually a very attractive, uh, very attractive proposition for, for a lot of folks involved. Um, and actually, you know, the ... If you look at the, these deals in particular, Gavin, you, you pointed out, but, you know, they're, they're actually monetizing, you know, perhaps better than [laughs] other players in the space by selling this infrastructure.

    20. BG

      A lot higher. Um, Google is obviously paying SpaceX a huge premium for this compute. Fox, you said something that I thought was really important, which is, you know, it may very well be that in order to get, you know, first in line on space compute, which Google certainly wants to do, that they're willing to pay a premium for their terrestrial compute. And so to me, that's how you kind of square the circle as to why the premium. Any thoughts?

    21. GB

      Yeah, look, I think there's some of that embedded there. But, um, look, at the end of the day, SpaceX can stand up compute quickly, they can stand it up coherently, and they can stand up a lot of it in one place and have it readily available. So look, I think that's most of the premium. But outside of that, certainly-

    22. BG

      Yeah

    23. GB

      ... people are going to space over time, so.

    24. BG

      I'm gonna pay a little call option to get first in line for space.

    25. GB

      There you go. Good way-

    26. BG

      We've all been investing-

    27. SP

      Yeah

    28. BG

      ... in the neo cloud space.

    29. SP

      Yes.

    30. BG

      So, like-

  5. 19:08 – 26:01

    Data Centers Are Not Commodities: First-Principles Design

    1. GB

      What I would say is that I think there is a belief that these data centers are commodities.

    2. BG

      Mm-hmm.

    3. GB

      And I do not share that belief.

    4. BG

      Mm-hmm.

    5. GB

      Um, I don't think anybody-

    6. BG

      No

    7. GB

      ... around this table shares that belief. And in the same way that Elon was able to re-engineer a rocket from first principles and re- make it reusable, he engineered an electric car from first principles. You know, everyone else was trying to, you know, make an electric car like an internal combustion engine car, and he thought about it differently. And, um, I think he looked at data center design from first principles and he designed something fundamentally different. And I did actually ask the team, I said, "Hey guys, maybe, uh, be a little less public about things that are very obvious to you- [laughs]

    8. BG

      Right

    9. GB

      ... about how to design a data center-

    10. BG

      Yeah

    11. GB

      ... but are revelations to other people."

    12. BG

      Right.

    13. GB

      Because I think what you're doing is maybe, um, more differentiated than you perhaps realize, 'cause what you're doing is so logical to you but maybe lo- not logical to everyone else. And that's h- how he was able to do it-

    14. BG

      Right. Yeah

    15. GB

      ... in 122 days.

    16. BG

      Yeah, to, I mean, to that point, Brad, yesterday we were meeting one of our portfolio companies and we were talking about behind the meter and we're, you know, really thinking about it. There's only maybe two or three, two or three players now that can actually reliably engineer a behind-the-meter, uh, data center. And, you know, there's real engineering work that goes into all of this.

    17. GB

      So if you think about this-

    18. BG

      Yeah

    19. GB

      ... i- if you're a gas combustion... If you're Vernova and you say, "We only have a certain number of gas combustion engines. Now we can sell them to x.AI or we can sell them to one of these startup Neoclouds," who are you gonna sell them to? Well, and there's another dynamic. Everyone starts making more money-

    20. BG

      Right

    21. GB

      ... when the GPUs get energized-

    22. BG

      Faster

    23. GB

      ... and sold. Faster.

    24. BG

      Exactly.

    25. GB

      So literally speed is money for all of the suppliers.

    26. BG

      Right.

    27. GB

      And by power, land, turbines. So I think it's... We'll, we'll see.

    28. BG

      Right.

    29. GB

      Hey, Brad, man.

    30. BG

      And, and, uh, but, but this is just, we're just talking terrestrial.

  6. 26:01 – 29:25

    Orbital Compute Economics: $5B Per Gigawatt in Space vs. $25B on the Ground

    1. CT

      AI satellites. You know, Elon did a great, um-

    2. BG

      Yeah, that pod, that, that pod was incredible, that he laid out the other day, the specs on the satellites.

    3. CT

      It was really great because I think they are finally showing people here's how you could viably-

    4. BG

      Mm

    5. CT

      ... design one of these satellites, and how heavy is the satellite, how many could you fit into a Starship launch. And when you back into the numbers, you get to something like five megawatts of capacity per Starship launch.

    6. BG

      Right.

    7. CT

      There's 100 metric tons in one of those Starships. So you can back into the math of how much will it cost-

    8. BG

      Right

    9. CT

      ... per gigawatt to launch these satellites into space.

    10. BG

      Right.

    11. CT

      Launch this compute into space. Um, and the math that you get to before you account for things like, um, bad GPUs-

    12. BG

      Mm-hmm

    13. CT

      ... bad satellites, right? These will all be things that happen. But the math you get to is it's about $5 billion per gigawatt of CapEx to put these in space.

    14. BG

      Right.

    15. CT

      For comparison, terrestrially, talk about the switch gears, the generators, the transformers, the shell, getting the power. That today is about 25, 20 to 25 billion per gigawatt. So we're talking about a 5X reduction in cost on half of your bill of materials-

    16. BG

      Right

    17. CT

      ... for the data center.

    18. BG

      Right.

    19. CT

      Which is a huge number.

    20. GB

      Yeah, just, just very simply, I mean, just to say it, put, it costs $60 billion to put a gigawatt-

    21. CT

      Mm-hmm

    22. GB

      ... on the ground today.

    23. CT

      Yeah.

    24. GB

      And we'll call it 35 of that is, are the GPUs and the silicon that's doing the training and the inference. And 25 billion is the land, the shell, the power, and the cooling. I would hypothesize that those elements are probably gonna be inflationary, so that 25 billion-

    25. CT

      Yes

    26. GB

      ... may not go down. And because space, power, cooling are ef- effectively free in space, and when I say space, I mean land.

    27. CT

      Yes.

    28. BG

      Yes.

    29. GB

      You know? [laughs] There's no land in space, but there is space in space.

    30. BG

      But there's a lot of space. There's a lot of space in space.

  7. 29:25 – 35:05

    The Most Underrated Variable: What Cursor Does for xAI's Model

    1. BG

      the price even further. The one thing we haven't talked about is their model, right? And I find this surprising, right? Six, six months ago, x.AI was competing, they were doing pretty well, but they've done something dramatic over the course of the past couple, uh, couple months, which is they bought Cursor. Right? Cursor is 700, 800 people, was already doing incredibly well from a revenue perspective. Our own, uh, projections were that they could exit this year at up to $10 billion of revenue, so they were growing very fa- fast. Uh, uh, one of the leading coding agents. But they also had this incredible team with the potential, right, to really build a frontier level model, but they were compute constrained. So all of a sudden, they get bought by X. X has massive compute that they can now train on. Um, and when I think about the revenue in AI, the... Like if I look at that line item in the models, having it go from $10 billion to 150 billion, yes, a lot of that will be the Core Weave type business that they have, but the question is, how much of that is going to be the core x.AI business that's really powered by the new team from Cursor? So any thoughts on that, Gavin?

    2. GB

      Right now, so Composer 2.5 was Pareto dominant 12 days ago.

    3. BG

      Right.

    4. GB

      It was trained on the Kimi K 2.5 base model.

    5. BG

      Right

    6. GB

      Now what's happening is the Grok 4.3 1.5 trillion parameter model is training. One would hypothesize based on scaling laws that that will, might be a better base model. And then the Cursor data is being injected into the pre-training process, not just reinforcement learning. And we'll see, and I think that is gonna be a very important data point when that comes out.

    7. SP

      Right.

    8. GB

      And I just think everyone should keep in mind that once you are at multiple places on that Pareto c- curve, if you have compute, you can scale really rapidly.

    9. SP

      Mm.

    10. BG

      You know, that, that to me is if I had to say what the one piece that's being lost in the story, right? Like, it's easy for everybody to get excited about the deals with Anthropic because you can put your hands around that. You know how much revenue it is. I see debate about, you know, the 90-day termination and how long they'll last and what multiple do you put on those revenues. But I think the thing that's getting lost is I think they dramatically advanced their capability when it comes to building a frontier model. People outside Silicon Valley may not know, you know, Michael and the team at Cursor as well. This is an extraordinary team-

    11. GB

      [laughs]

    12. BG

      ... that he just downloaded-

    13. SP

      Mm

    14. BG

      ... right, into SpaceX. SpaceX was already building good models, and what they have is an, they have this way to monetize compute that gives you this call option that you can pull all that compute in-house, right, to train a model and then to run the model. I suspect if there's an upside surprise, if we w- went around the table, I'd say this is the place that's getting the least amount of attention and could have the biggest upside surprise.

    15. SP

      Yeah.

    16. BG

      Any, any thoughts, Clark, o- on what you think is being overlooked or areas that you think are misunderstood about the business today?

    17. SP

      I, I would say, I would say what the last few weeks have proven is that Elon, um, their team can stand up all this compute. Actually, if you just, you know, went back one and a half years, you know, they were behind in the race to stand up compute. They were, you know, they, they didn't have that many H100s.

    18. BG

      Right.

    19. SP

      They brought in Colossus. Then they brought in Colossus 2 at a scale much larger than anyone else. And now, you know, as we gear for Vera Rubin, you know, from, you know, a lot of my conversations, it looks like they've, you know, secured maybe up to 20% of Vera Rubin capacity.

    20. GB

      It's extraordinary.

    21. SP

      Especially in the early days of, you know, when, you know, these, these chips are very scarce, that, that they are going to have a, a, a, a, a lead on all of this because, you know, people think that they can stand up this compute better.

    22. BG

      Mm.

    23. SP

      So I think they'll al- you know, what, what the last few weeks have actually shown is that Elon, you know, Elon will take, you know, take a shot at hitting the frontier. But if it, you know, if for whatever reason, um, they, they have over-procured some capacity, this is a very scarce asset that they've shown that they can monetize at actually, you know, best in class margins and payback periods.

    24. BG

      I mean, the irony is-

    25. SP

      Yeah

    26. BG

      ... like, you know, r- you and I have been doing this long enough to know, I mean, that's why Bezos built AWS, right? He had to build capacity for Black Friday.

    27. SP

      Yeah.

    28. BG

      Right? But then the rest of the year he sat on all this capacity that he had to build, and he figured out a really incredible way to monetize this. And by the way, investors at the time, 2009, 2010, when he was building out the capability around AWS, hated it-

    29. GB

      Of course

    30. BG

      ... because he was consuming all that free cash flow. Mi- meanwhile, he was digging the biggest gold mine in the history of the world, right?

  8. 35:05 – 37:00

    Bull & Bear Case — Can SpaceX Really 8X Revenue in 4 Years?

    1. BG

      right, the bears are looking at last year's revenue, say it was $18 billion, and they're looking at the forecast from the banks of $160 billion, you know, three years from now. And they're saying, "Listen, not many companies in the history of the world have basically 8X'd their revenue over three to four years," right? So that's where, you know, I think, and people get nervous about the valuation. When I look at this, again, when you break it down as an analyst, first principles, part by part, which is what I tried to do here, right? When you look at Starlink, it looks totally doable. When I look at what they're building in AI compute terrestrially, looks totally doable over the course of the next three years. When I look at the model itself after the acquisition of Cursor, you know, combining those things around the compute they have, that looks to me like it could be an upside surprise. So I would say that I think that, uh, you know, in the IPO, but I think when you look back three years from now, there's a decent chance that everybody's like, "Oh, my God, that was super obvious," right? Even though today all of these things have risk associated. Back to where we started. I'm not, you know, none of us are here to pump the IPO at $1.77 trillion. It's really to just break it down as we do inside our shop and to say, what is that distribution of future probabilities? What's the probability that it's higher from here? What's the pro- and I think we're all pretty AI pilled, and if you're AI pilled, that means we gotta build a lot more compute than the world thinks, and that these models are gonna be a lot more valuable than people think. You combine that with their core business, I don't know another entrepreneur or another business that's a better bet on the future, right, than SpaceX. And so I think for most institutional investors, it's a must buy, a must own. It's set it and forget it. Right? In order to have a, a, a real bet on both the space and the AI future.

    2. GB

      From your lips to God's ears.

    3. BG

      I mean, listen, I, I, again-

    4. GB

      [laughs]

    5. BG

      ... I think that I, I, I think that you're gonna have to wait. But, you know, we had this chart last week, right, that came out everybody was sending around Twitter

  9. 37:00 – 43:56

    Post-IPO Drawdowns, Lock-Ups & How to Size the Position

    1. BG

      conveniently timed. And, you know, it's like shows the average max drawdown post-IPO for, like, 20 companies from Facebook, Twitter, Alibaba, Shopify is, you know, over 50%. And so maybe that, again, we'll, we'll, we'll end this section here. You know, Gavin, you and I have been doing this a long time. We know it's going to be bouncy around the IPO. Um, you know, how do you as a manager try to, try to manage that? Um, do you try to trade ar- a- around the IPO? Do you set it kinda and forget it? I would say from an Altimeter perspective, what we tend to do is we take a base position that we set and forget, right? And then we may size up or size down depending upon how the market reacts in, you know, in, in a particular moment. Um, but any thoughts on, on this chart or y- y- you know, how, how people, you guys are thinking about it in particular. You obviously own a lot going into it.

    2. GB

      First, agree with absolutely everything you said, and I actually think about it the same way. Set it and forget it.

    3. BG

      Yeah.

    4. GB

      You've talked about you have ballast, you move around.

    5. BG

      Right.

    6. GB

      And you move the ballast to one side of the ship. When you want a-

    7. BG

      [laughs] Totally

    8. GB

      ... the ship to lean into the wind to go faster-

    9. BG

      Yeah

    10. GB

      ... and you move it to the other side.

    11. BG

      Exactly.

    12. GB

      When you don't want the ship to tip over. I think that's a great analogy.

    13. BG

      Mm.

    14. GB

      Think about all y- important companies in the portfolio the same way, so 100% agree. I mean, this, this chart is a bummer.

    15. BG

      Yeah.

    16. GB

      What I would say is, you know, this data on IPOs, but what I would just say is this is a really unprecedented situation.

    17. BG

      Yes.

    18. GB

      We've never had an IPO this big. We've never had an IPO that's gonna go into an index this quickly.

    19. BG

      That fast.

    20. GB

      We simply do not know how much selling there will be from investors. I would hazard a guess. I mean, I'm... I don't know. But Elon, I don't think he needs liquidity, and I think he owns... What does he own, Foxey?

    21. BG

      S- 50%-ish.

    22. GB

      50% of the company.

    23. BG

      And by the way, he's locked up for 365 days.

    24. GB

      Yeah. [laughs] Yes, exactly.

    25. BG

      366 days. So we know he's not selling, right?

    26. GB

      So I just think it's an unprecedented situation. And the right answer-

    27. BG

      Yeah

    28. GB

      ... is I don't know what's gonna happen in the short term.

    29. BG

      Yeah.

    30. GB

      And the right answer that I would just, you know, encourage every investor making their own decision is to just think exactly the way you articulated it. We have these different levers. We have these different variables. Think about each one of them from first principles. Make your own decision.

  10. 43:56 – 51:00

    Fable 5, Mythos & Why Snapshot Benchmarks Are Broken

    1. BG

      us your thoughts.

    2. GB

      I mean, um, it's hard to say that Anthropic's not up. [laughs]

    3. BG

      Yeah.

    4. GB

      Like after the revenue numbers they put up, after the Fable 5 release, and Mythos is evidently even better. But I just think that Noam Brown-

    5. BG

      Yeah

    6. GB

      ... post from yesterday-

    7. BG

      Yeah

    8. GB

      ... Polynomial, is so profound.

    9. BG

      Yeah.

    10. GB

      And just the idea that we do not know how smart these models are.

    11. BG

      Okay.

    12. GB

      And we made-

    13. BG

      So say more about that

    14. GB

      ... yeah.

    15. BG

      Why don't we know how smart they are?

    16. GB

      Because nobody has run-

    17. BG

      Yeah

    18. GB

      ... Mythos for a year-

    19. BG

      Exactly

    20. GB

      ... continuously. And we may never know how smart each generation of models actually is or was, but because we don't have time to a- appropriately evaluate their intelligence before the next model comes out. I mean, this is a profound statement. And just, just imagine, okay? So I always say, like when you think about FSD, just imagine a human being who never gets distracted, never gets tired, never talks on the phone in the car, never drinks and drives, never yells at their kids-

    21. BG

      [laughs]

    22. GB

      ... never has to go to the backseat to give their baby a bottle. And like of course you would think that over time that is superior to humans who are distracted. I don't know how long... How long can you think deeply about one topic, Brad?

    23. BG

      Yeah, yeah.

    24. GB

      What, it can be on, it can be on anything. [laughs]

    25. BG

      [laughs] It's like an hour. It's like an hour.

    26. GB

      A bit.

    27. BG

      Yeah. [laughs]

    28. GB

      That makes me feel terrible.

    29. BG

      [laughs]

    30. GB

      'Cause I think I can think deeply about one topic-

  11. 51:00 – 1:04:11

    Frontier vs. Open Source: 90% of Revenue Accrues at the Frontier

    1. BG

      in order to get there.

    2. GB

      Yeah, I would just say two thing, I... Two things can be true.

    3. BG

      Mm-hmm.

    4. GB

      The majority of economic value may continue to accrue to the frontier.

    5. BG

      Right.

    6. GB

      And man, has it ever accrued to the frontier thus far-

    7. BG

      Right

    8. GB

      ... and for sure the first six months this year. But the majority of tokens consumed in the world may be open source.

    9. BG

      And they are, today.

    10. GB

      Yes. I, and I think that this current state-

    11. BG

      Mm-hmm

    12. GB

      ... is likely to persist.

    13. BG

      Yeah.

    14. GB

      Harvey had a great, um, blog post that they put out on X. And they used, and it's just amazing how everything gets out, out of date, like, in five days, [laughs] you know?

    15. BG

      [laughs]

    16. GB

      But they used their own proprietary legal data to do reinforcement learning and supervised fine-tuning, uh, with Fireworks on an open source model, and then they used a router, and a router being something that picks which model you send which query to-

    17. BG

      Exactly

    18. GB

      ... and which model you use to check which model, and they got better outcomes than an Opus 4, either 4.7 or 4.8, at a lower cost.

    19. BG

      Yes.

    20. GB

      And I think that is the future.

    21. BG

      Yeah.

    22. GB

      And the reality is they were still consuming a lot of Opus-

    23. BG

      Yeah

    24. GB

      ... but a majority of the tokens they were processing-

    25. SP

      Mm.

    26. BG

      Yes

    27. GB

      ... probably were in their own-

    28. SP

      Yeah

    29. GB

      ... open source RL model.

    30. BG

      We hear the s- we hear the same thing. We did-

  12. 1:04:11 – 1:18:13

    $1.5T in CapEx vs. $300B in AI Revenue — Does the Math Math?

    1. BG

      if we compare this to the total incremental inference revenue, so the thing that the market gets worried about, you know, back to my Sam Altman podcast, you know, in October of last year, can we really afford to spend 1.5 trillion of CapEx a year if we're only generating X amount in inference revenue? The thing I think that lit the fuse this year was Anthropic showed up in a major way with revenue, right? And so we have, you know, the AI lab revenue, everybody combined, at around $300 billion next year, right? So can't, you know, a- a- and go- roll that out to 2027. Uh, or that is 2027, 300 billion. So we're spending 1.5 trillion of CapEx on 300 billion of inference revenue. Does that math math for you? And what would cause you, you know, to, to get more nervous again about our ability to continue to make these investments? Because the second we get nervous about it, the entire semi complex is gonna come down a lot.

    2. GB

      Well, what do you think the gross margins are on that 300 billion?

    3. BG

      Yeah, let's call it 50%.

    4. GB

      I, I would guess they're probably a little bit higher than that.

    5. BG

      Yeah, yeah.

    6. GB

      I might say 60 or 70. But I mean, that math starts to math.

    7. BG

      Right.

    8. GB

      And what I would just say is I think that 300 billion is low, man.

    9. BG

      Yeah, yeah.

    10. GB

      I just think it's low. From your mouth to God's ears. Yeah, exactly.

    11. BG

      [laughs]

    12. GB

      I think, I think we end this year well over 200 billion-

    13. BG

      Mm-hmm

    14. GB

      ... in inference revenue, well over. And so I think the math really maths, and I do think we have to give, uh, Jensen- Yeah ... our friend, some credit because he said some things that seemed outlandish. Right. And he was conservative. He was low. Right. He said a trillion two years ago [laughs] , and I mean, he was really low. Right. And so, like, let's give the guy some credit and think about what he is saying right now.

    15. BG

      For sure. For sure. And, and, and listen, I would say consistently, Elon's been taking the over. Sundar's been taking the over. Sam, Dario. You know, Dario did the podcast with Dwarkesh when he was talking about country geniuses in a data center, and he said, "That will be here by 2028." He said, "Revenues will go into the low hundreds of billions by 2028." So let's call that, you know, three, 400 billion of revenue by 2028. And he said that a while ago now, so he may even be revising up his number. And he said, "It's hard for me to see that there won't be trillions of dollars in revenue before 2030." And if you're on that revenue trajectory, if we're on a trajectory to 200 by the end of this year, let's call it four or 500 by next year, and a, a, a path to trillion plus by 2029, then the math maths.

    16. GB

      And we gotta keep in mind that half of the spending-

    17. BG

      Right

    18. GB

      ... is there to-

    19. BG

      You know, for training, maybe a little less than half. What is it, Foxy?

    20. SP

      It's probably that. Depends on the lab, but it's, I would say it's increasingly less than half.

    21. GB

      Yes.

    22. BG

      Okay. So we'll call it 35%-

    23. GB

      Yeah

    24. BG

      ... is spending that's not revenue generating that is gonna kind of make the next model. So I think the math maths.

    25. GB

      Right.

    26. BG

      And there's still this prisoner's dilemma where if you opt out, that may be an existential decision.

    27. GB

      For, for sure.

    28. SP

      And I think, like, coming into this year, going back to this kind of what narratives were violated, you know.

    29. GB

      Right.

    30. SP

      I think into this year, everyone expected token pricing, uh, the price of compute, it's all deflationary.

  13. 1:18:13 – 1:20:32

    The Next $1 Trillion: Three Companies, Half the Time

    1. BG

      rate. I went back last night. In the last seven years, we've added $1 trillion of revenue to the Mag Seven in the last seven years, okay? To get to a trillion, to get to the first trillion of, you know, took over 20 years.

    2. GB

      Mm.

    3. BG

      In the last seven, we added another tr- trillion, and that added $17 trillion in market cap, that trillion dollars, okay? Uh, the forecast now that we're gonna add another trillion of revenue in just three companies, SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI, over the next four to five years.

    4. GB

      Hm.

    5. BG

      Okay? Like, not seven companies, three companies, and in half the time, right? And so I would say that, you know, we are going to have bumps in the road. I know that it's going to be like this, but we're going to higher highs because the size of the prize, this is going to transform 5, 10, 15% of global GDP, there is no doubt in my mind. And 10% of global GDP is $10 trillion. It's an exciting future to be a part of. It's fun to do it with you guys. I think we're gonna have to do our work to do the things to make sure America wins, and that we evolve the social contract, keep everybody, you know, lift the floor, take everybody with us on this ride. Um, but it's a, uh, it's a, it's a really exciting time to be doing what we're doing, and it's fun to be doing it with you guys.

    6. GB

      Yeah.

    7. BG

      Thanks for having us.

    8. GB

      I just want to say, Brad, thanks for having us.

    9. BG

      Thank you.

    10. GB

      And thank you for what you've done with the Trump accounts.

    11. BG

      Yeah, yeah. Appreciate it.

    12. GB

      I actually think it's super important for America, for the world, to give people an equity stake-

    13. BG

      Yeah

    14. GB

      ... at a very young age. They, they will see it compound-

    15. BG

      Yeah. Yeah

    16. GB

      ... over their lifetimes.

    17. BG

      Yeah.

    18. GB

      This is a great thing you've done for the world, so thank you.

    19. BG

      Yeah.

    20. GB

      I'd echo all your comments, like-

    21. BG

      Yeah

    22. GB

      ... deep admiration for you, your team, gratitude for the collegiality-

    23. BG

      Yeah

    24. GB

      ... and friendship between our firms. I know Clark and Foxy, they hang out, like, all the time. [laughs]

    25. BG

      [laughs] I mean, that's it. People think that, you, you, you know, and there are people in our business who don't want to share anything.

    26. GB

      Hm.

    27. BG

      Our view is, like, we open source it. Um, but there are very few people who we actually call and ask their opinion because there are very few people who do the thousands of hours of work that we do, um, that, you know, that are adding to that. And you do it, and we appreciate that. And you do as well, Gavin, we appreciate that. So with that love fest, let's call it a wrap.

    28. GB

      [laughs]

    29. BG

      Thanks for being here.

    30. GB

      Thank you.

Episode duration: 1:20:47

In the uListen app, the transcript lights up word by word as you listen. Get uListen

Transcript of episode Tx9jT2c6e3U

Get more out of YouTube videos.

Read along on your phone, search it beside the video, or ask your favorite AI app what was said.