Skip to content

By playing, you agree to uListen's Terms and Privacy Policy and YouTube's Terms of Service.

Bloomberg OriginalsBloomberg Originals

Palmer Luckey Wants to Be Silicon Valley's War King | The Circuit

For years, a Hawaiian-shirt wearing, flip-flop clad, smack-talking entrepreneur has been promising to disrupt the US defense industry.

Emily ChanghostPalmer Luckeyguest
May 15, 202429mWatch on YouTube

Summaries, chapters, transcripts, and FAQs on this page are made by uListen, not YouTube.

Transcript

0:00 – 0:06

Intro

Emily Chang 0:00 [dramatic music]

0:06 – 1:03

A ride on Luckey’s ex–Navy special operations boat and why speed matters

Emily Chang 0:06 I'm driving Palmer Luckey's personal warship, and we're all about to die. [screams] Sorry, guys.

Palmer Luckey 0:16 So this is a Mark V special operations craft that I purchased from the Navy.

Emily Chang 0:21 Are you sure I'm not gonna flip the boat?

Palmer Luckey 0:22 Yep, you're gonna be fine. It's the fastest boat that the Navy ever built. It was designed specifically for Navy SEAL insertion and extraction missions. It runs really fast and it's a lot of fun.

Emily Chang 0:33 [laughs] While this boat may be part of the old navy, Luckey is trying to bring Silicon Valley speed and innovation back to the Pentagon.

Palmer Luckey 0:43 Well, some of the United States technology is very bad. It's also extremely expensive and not necessarily adapted to the types of conflicts we're going to see in the future. The United States has a lot of investment in legacy weapons systems that are not necessarily having China quaking in their boots.

1:03 – 1:57

Luckey’s image problem: a Silicon Valley founder taking defense seriously

Emily Chang 1:03 He's betting his new age defense company can take a slice of the Pentagon's $850 billion budget and reinvent how they do business from the outside in. That is, if they can beat the incumbents and convince the top brass that a billionaire founder sporting Hawaiian shirts is just as serious about rebooting America's arsenal as they are. You're not the typical Silicon Valley founder, wearing a black turtleneck.

Palmer Luckey 1:29 [laughs]

Emily Chang 1:29 Nor are you walking around and talking like a buttoned-up-

Palmer Luckey 1:31 Yeah

Emily Chang 1:31 ... defense contractor CEO. Like, how does that play?

Palmer Luckey 1:35 I am a little bit of a caricature, uh, but it's because I just haven't changed. It was really easy when we started Anduril to say, "Conflict is over. We're living at the end of history. This idea of putting our best brains towards things that can kill people is a waste of talent and a waste of money, and unethical." And that's not what anyone's saying anymore.

1:57 – 4:12

From Cold War roots to today’s renewed tech–defense handshake

Emily Chang 1:57 The war in Ukraine and China's rapid militarization have renewed fears that the US defense industry isn't modernizing fast enough. That's brought a controversial handshake between tech and defense back out in the open. The military has a long and storied history with the tech industry. Post World War II, billions in defense funding transformed California into aerospace and technology boom towns. The first company to manufacture microchips that guided missiles, satellites, and helped Silicon Valley get its name, was funded by the Pentagon. Founders of that very company pioneered modern-day venture capital and helped cultivate a vibrant tech industry. Today, there's a new generation trying to bring back America's past, proven by Palmer Luckey's collection of unusual vehicles. You sure it still works?

Palmer Luckey 3:06 It should, it should.

Emily Chang 3:07 [laughs] Ah.

Palmer Luckey 3:22 So this is a 1967 Disneyland Autopia, uh, designed by Bob Gurr and Walt Disney. As far as I know, mine is the only complete Autopia that is outside of the parks. Mine has the original mechanicals, original gearboxes, original wheels, the whole deal.

Emily Chang 3:40 Awesome.

Palmer Luckey 3:40 When I got it, though... Uh-oh.

Emily Chang 3:45 Technical difficulties.

Palmer Luckey 3:49 Got a, you got, got a flathead screwdriver? Oh, there we go. Look at that. We gotta get moving. All right, there we go. Back in business.

Emily Chang 4:01 Woo! Back in business. So are you sure this is street legal?

Palmer Luckey 4:05 We're on the street, aren't we?

Emily Chang 4:06 [laughs]

4:12 – 5:16

How Southern California shaped Luckey’s defense mindset

Emily Chang 4:12 You grew up in Long Beach, right? Not too far from here.

Palmer Luckey 4:15 That's right. Close to the port, and it was a place with a lot of car culture, a lot of aerospace culture, a lot of defense activity. I grew up watching the Marine Corps practice right offshore in their helicopters, watching Navy ships do exercises. And, uh, you know, get, it gets in your brain and it doesn't leave. Southern California, unlike a lot of places, is a place where almost everybody knows someone who has served in the military or has a family member who served in the military. When that's the case, because of the density of military population here, you don't really have the crazy political ideology that you get in places like the Bay Area. But when I started Anduril, of course, it was a totally different world. Uh, defense was not cool, and it was definitely not the hottest thing.

5:16 – 6:13

Oculus, the Silicon Valley rift, and Luckey’s move away from the Valley

Emily Chang 5:16 Before launching Anduril, Luckey worked on virtual reality headsets in his parents' garage. By age 18, he had a prototype that kickstarted the modern VR movement and caught the world's attention, including Mark Zuckerberg. Zuckerberg bought Oculus for $2 billion. Luckey was later ousted.

Palmer Luckey 5:36 The thing is, I'm, I'm actually not nearly as political of a person as people think. I am political-

Emily Chang 5:40 I mean, people think you got kicked out of Silicon Valley.

Palmer Luckey 5:43 Yeah, I got kicked out of Silicon Valley because I made a $9,000 political donation. The reason that people pay attention to it at the end of the day is because it's novel for a person in tech to have supported the person who became president that year.

Emily Chang 5:56 To be clear, he means this guy. Meta disputes that Luckey was fired for his political views, but whatever the reason, the result was a rift between Luckey and the Valley. So he turned his attention to defense and set up shop in Southern California.

6:13 – 8:12

Inside Luckey’s personal world: home, hobbies, and gamer-to-defense connections

Palmer Luckey 6:13 This is my extraordinarily tall door. The house was built in the 1980s, and I've kept all the bones the same. I think it's a pretty cool place, has some good Miami Vice vibes. I've got my, my two-inch, uh, teal shag carpet. This is my fish tank. It's about a 6,500-gallon aquarium.

Emily Chang 6:34 This looks like a Dungeons & Dragons table.

Palmer Luckey 6:37 Oh, th- no, this is just my coffee table.

Emily Chang 6:39 Oh.

Palmer Luckey 6:39 Although it does have a map of our Dungeons & Dragons campaign.

Emily Chang 6:42 What kind of character are you in Dungeons & Dragons?

Palmer Luckey 6:44 I'm a chaotic, neutral wizard, uh, named Nilrem5.

Emily Chang 6:48 [laughs]

Palmer Luckey 6:48 He's from the lost nation of Atlantis.

Emily Chang 6:52 How much success have you had with that?

Palmer Luckey 6:53 Pretty limited so far.

Emily Chang 6:55 [laughs]

Palmer Luckey 6:55 Pretty limited so far.

Emily Chang 6:58 I know you're a big gamer. What are the connections between navigating a virtual battlefield and a real battlefield?

Palmer Luckey 7:04 Probably the, the main similarities are some of the technology that we're applying to things like heads-up displays and augmented reality for, for soldiers and airmen to allow them to see where the danger on the battlefield is. It's also worth noting that really virtual reality came out of military research in the first place, and the games industry and the military industrial complex have always shared kind of back and forth.

Emily Chang 7:31 How'd you get interested in defense technology?

Palmer Luckey 7:33 I briefly was able to work as a lab technician on an Army project called Brave Mind. It was treating veterans with PTSD using virtual reality exposure therapy, and that was actually before I started Oculus. I kept in touch with a lot of friends in the defense industry, and what I heard over and over again is that it was broken, the incentives were wrong. They were being punished for doing the right thing, rewarded for doing the wrong thing. They made more money when they were over budget, and, uh, that really got me worried, especially in a world where we were running a new experiment as a country, an experiment where for the first time in American history, tech companies were not working with DOD.

8:12 – 9:51

Why defense innovation stalls: the Pentagon’s “Valley of Death” and billionaire workarounds

Emily Chang 8:12 The relationship between Silicon Valley and Washington splintered after the Cold War. Top talent caught the dot-com wave, ditching government jobs in windowless rooms for positions at shiny tech firms.

Palmer Luckey 8:24 Everybody used to work on Capitol Hill or the government or the military. Now everybody works for an internet startup.

Emily Chang 8:30 The defense industry consolidated power around five big primes to supply the military's hardware and software. It's a large, complex oligopoly with a strict chain of command that filters ideas through layers upon layers upon layers of bureaucracy. For tech startups looking to get a piece of the action, welcome to the Valley of Death. The government tries to nurture new ideas, but the amount of time it takes to go from prototype to adoption puts most startups in the defense market graveyard. It seemed impossible for outsiders to compete until SpaceX and Palantir sued the government, claiming the bidding system unfairly favored the incumbents. Palantir co-founder Peter Thiel's venture firm was the first to invest in Anduril.

Palmer Luckey 9:15 It's no coincidence that the only two companies to break through in the last 35 years since the winding down of the Cold War really, uh, were both founded by billionaires. It's, it's, it's unfortunate, but it reflects the reality that we've created, where this muscle we used to have as a country of turning small, innovative defense companies into large-scale providers of weapons, uh, we, we, we lost it, and the only way to bypass that was to already have made billions of dollars somewhere else. As a, as a country, we need to do better.

9:51 – 10:47

Building Anduril in Southern California and recruiting talent with mission-driven rhetoric

Emily Chang 9:51 So this is the old LA Times printing plant.

Palmer Luckey 9:54 It was the old LA Times printing press. I started Oculus in Orange County.

Emily Chang 10:00 Uh-huh.

Palmer Luckey 10:00 And it was a place where I could hire people from all over the country. When I moved up to the Bay Area, it actually became a lot harder to hire people who weren't already in the Bay Area, but this is a place where you can build great companies that draw from all of America, not just from that one tight, little isolated bubble.

Emily Chang 10:17 Well, I was actually wondering, is it, is it, is it hard to poach people from sort of big tech companies?

Palmer Luckey 10:21 Oh, no. No, the way that you poach people from big tech companies is to tell them that their career is meaningless and that they're wasting their lives on something that doesn't matter. A decent chunk of people, when you can kind of shock them out of the matrix, be, "What are you doing with your life? There's big problems in the world and you're not part of solving them," that's been behind a lot of the people who leave big tech companies, come to work at Anduril.

10:47 – 12:32

Anduril’s product line and startup-style business model versus cost-plus contracting

Emily Chang 10:47 Anduril has been clear from the get-go. To come here is to build weapons and surveillance systems. They started with this tall autonomous security tower that sits on borders in the US and abroad, launched in the early days of the Trump presidency. They've expanded their arsenal to autonomous submarines, counter-drones, and other robots that are cheaper to build with menacing names.

Palmer Luckey 11:13 This is a half-scale model of Fury, which is an autonomous fighter jet that we're building. This is Wisp. This is scanning infrared imager that's able to detect aircraft-

Emily Chang 11:26 Ooh

Palmer Luckey 11:26 ... by building a 360-degree sphere that it integrates as it scans. And, uh, this is an electronic warfare system. It can jam and hack and make sure that you're able to talk and the, the other guy isn't in a whole bunch of really powerful ways.

Emily Chang 11:43 You're trying to run a defense tech company like a startup. How does that compare to, like, Lockheed Martin and Boeing, and how do you get Washington to accept that?

Palmer Luckey 11:53 Most new R&D is done on a cost-plus basis, meaning the contractor gets paid for their time, their materials, and then a fixed percentage of profit on top. Of course, that incentivizes you to come up with expensive solutions and to drag it out as long as, as long as you can. At Anduril, we're the opposite. Because we're a defense products company that makes things that work and sell them rather than getting paid to do work-

Emily Chang 12:16 Mm-hmm

Palmer Luckey 12:16 ... uh, it means that when we do something faster, it helps our profit margins.

Emily Chang 12:23 You're building products that the government doesn't even know it needs yet, right?

Palmer Luckey 12:27 Very often. It's pretty rare that we work on something that is consensus in the government.

12:32 – 14:43

AI, autonomy, and lessons from Ukraine: faster experimentation and unmanned-on-unmanned combat

Emily Chang 12:32 Yeah.

Palmer Luckey 12:32 Where there's widespread belief that what we're doing is the right solution to the problem. Often, we're building things that they've written off as not feasible or not viable. There was a lot of skepticism about applying artificial intelligence to defense, a lot of skepticism about artificial intelligence in general. ChatGPT was one of the most helpful technologies to us because it helped convince people that AI can do things they didn't believe computers could do.

Emily Chang 12:58 Are we getting to a point where battles could be fought by AI and counter AI only?

Palmer Luckey 13:02 We're not gonna have systems that are acting entirely on their own without human direction, but will we see dog fights between AI fighter jets that don't have people in them? Yes, absolutely. In fact, in Ukraine, there's been a variety of engagements where you had, uh, unmanned systems destroying other unmanned systems.

Emily Chang 13:18 It seems like what's happening in Ukraine has marked a shift in, in warfare strategy.

Palmer Luckey 13:24 What's happening u- in Ukraine is, is fascinating because they can't afford to treat warfare as the thing to be think tanked-

Emily Chang 13:33 Yeah

Palmer Luckey 13:33 ... or as a thing to be debated in white papers. They have to actually win today, and that means that a lot of barriers to trying new ideas have been lifted, and that's one of the reasons you've seen, for example, the proliferation of small unmanned armed quadcopters. It's why you've seen-

Emily Chang 13:48 Yeah

Palmer Luckey 13:48 ... the proliferation of a lot of really interesting counter drone systems, things that were not nearly mature enough to be deployed, let's say, by the United States. Uh, but they are willing to deploy them in a very early stage of maturity because they know they can't win doing things the old way.

Emily Chang 14:07 Yeah. The old way meant having the biggest, most expensive weapon on the battlefield. Now, it's about having a swarm of commercial technology available quickly and cheaply. To that end, the Pentagon recently announced the Replicator program to fast-track thousands of low-cost autonomous drones. Startups and venture capitalists, who historically shunned military work, declared, "It's time to build," to get in on the action.

Palmer Luckey 14:33 The old school way of working through five, six large primes and developing-

14:37 Yeah

14:37 ... technology just doesn't work. You have to work with the private sector to bring new technologies in.

14:43 – 16:03

Employee pushback, misuse fears, and where Luckey says accountability should live

Emily Chang 14:43 Big tech firms have had more long-term success offering hardware, AI, and cloud services in exchange for billion-dollar deals. But there's been friction on the tech company side from engineers who don't want anything to do with the military. Some tech employees have pushed back on working with the US government and the US military.

Palmer Luckey 15:01 Yes.

Emily Chang 15:01 Do you see where they're coming from?

Palmer Luckey 15:03 Fundamentally, I think it's an emotional thing. They came to a company to work on consumer tech. They weren't told that their work would be used for potentially violence.

Emily Chang 15:12 Mm-hmm.

Palmer Luckey 15:13 And they don't like that, and I, I, I empathize with that because, to them, it feels like a little bit of a bait and switch.

Emily Chang 15:22 Critics see the technology you're building, worry it could be misused on-

Palmer Luckey 15:25 Sure

Emily Chang 15:25 ... American citizens, for example.

Palmer Luckey 15:27 Sure.

Emily Chang 15:27 Are they right to worry?

Palmer Luckey 15:28 Oh, of course. Anything can be misused, but look, like if you wanna point to things that can be misused against American citizens, I mean, the military has a lot of guns. The military has a lot of aircraft. You have to have trust in the system. You have to believe that democracy works, and you have to believe that the right way to control these is on the policy side. There are actually things I would like to build that the DOD would not use and would not deploy, that they do think are beyond the pale, and that's the way that it should be. US foreign policy and military policy shouldn't be in the hands of corporate executives.

16:03 – 18:32

Lattice: Anduril’s AI control layer and the hardest problem—correct identification

Emily Chang 16:03 The heart of Anduril's technology isn't its hardware, but its software. Engineers here have developed a proprietary AI-driven system called Lattice that acts like an intelligent control center for the company's hardware.

Palmer Luckey 16:18 Lattice is our AI system for controlling distributed robots. We're doing processing and computer vision, machine learning on that data, and producing an operating picture of the world. So we understand the chessboard, so to speak, and then the autonomy can apply those very logical decisions about what to do and move forward and act.

Emily Chang 16:39 So walk me through the process from identification to decision, or decisions.

Palmer Luckey 16:44 So we've got a manned crew that's gonna try and fly in and land somewhere. They have some mission they need to do on the ground, but there's threats that are unknown. So we're gonna send the autonomous systems forward. They're going to try and draw out any enemy fire, and with these autonomous systems, you're okay if they, if they die. You're okay if they get taken out, 'cause that tells you more information about the, the battlefield so that you can make informed decisions.

Emily Chang 17:07 Interesting, but there's still a long way to go, right?

Palmer Luckey 17:10 Still a lot to build, yep.

17:11 There's the old saying, hardware is hard. The United States used to be able to build things that would fly twice as fast as our adversaries, and we'd be twice as fast for a decade. Those days are gone. Hardware advantages like that are gonna be quickly copied by our adversaries.

Emily Chang 17:26 Mm-hmm.

Palmer Luckey 17:27 So a lot of the most durable advantages we build, for example, using software to make decisions twice as fast or 10 times as fast, is a, is a capability that I don't think our adversaries-

Emily Chang 17:35 Mm

Palmer Luckey 17:35 ... are close to, to copying.

Emily Chang 17:39 Lattice is just one example of the military's increasing use of AI. The Pentagon has been developing Project Maven, an AI system that analyzes images from military drones and helps suggest targets. Google initially won this contract in 2018 but backed out after thousands of workers protested the deal. Palantir, Amazon, Microsoft, and Anduril are currently among the main contributors. Maven is now deployed, but there are still open questions about AI's combat readiness.

Palmer Luckey 18:11 At the end of the day, you just have to be correct, and you're doing it from afar. And so, uh, yes, I would still submit that that is one of the toughest things that my organizations have encountered, is that idea of distinguishing enemy from non-enemy or combatant from non-combatant, and the scale of it is impressive.

18:32 – 20:08

AI ethics and responsibility: fog of war, liability, and human accountability

Emily Chang 18:32 There are concerns that AI could deepen the fog of war. What do you think about that?

Palmer Luckey 18:36 No, I, I super, I super disagree. I think AI is gonna be a tool to put all the cards on the table for everyone. My hope is that you're gonna have dictators who make better decisions because even they have better information from AI. Let's use Putin as an example. I don't think he would've launched this invasion in Ukraine if he would've understood what was actually gonna happen. Remember, they believed this was like a three-day special operation. They were gonna roll in. It was gonna be over very, very quickly. If he had had a better understanding of what he had and what they had, I think he probably would not have made the play.

Emily Chang 19:09 There are a lot of thorny ethical questions. We're talking about a possible future of self-guided bombs and killer robots. Who is liable when a human isn't in the loop?

Palmer Luckey 19:20 The key is that a person is responsible for the deployment of those systems. The existence of an algorithm cannot replace human responsibility for deploying that weapons system.

Emily Chang 19:29 Mm.

Palmer Luckey 19:30 And it has to be a person who deeply understands the limitations of that system, and who's gonna be held to account when it goes wrong. But war is hell, and it's not gonna be perfect. There will be people who are killed be- by AI who should not have been killed.

Emily Chang 19:43 Mm.

Palmer Luckey 19:44 That is a, a, a certainty if artificial intelligence becomes a core part of the way that we fight wars. We need to make sure that people remain accountable for that, because that's the only thing that'll drive us to better solutions-

Emily Chang 19:55 Mm-hmm

Palmer Luckey 19:55 ... and fewer inadvertent deaths, fewer civilian casualties. I don't want AI to do these things, but a lot of times the existing technologies are much worse.

20:08 – 22:24

China, Taiwan, and industrial capacity: why Luckey says the US must “win with our brains”

Emily Chang 20:08 China and Taiwan, how does this play out?

Palmer Luckey 20:11 It could play out in a lot of different ways. Everything that Anduril is working on, on the R&D side, is oriented towards that fight. Right now, China believes that they can take Taiwan. They believe that the United States is some combination of won't stop them, isn't willing to stop them, won't win if we do try to stop them. They believe Taiwan is in a similar position with their own military. We have to change their minds. I'm probably gonna eat these words, but if China ends up invading Taiwan, I'm gonna feel like we've really failed in our mission.

Emily Chang 20:46 You actually spent a lot of time in China working on Oculus headsets. What do you know about China's capabilities in AI? What don't you know?

Palmer Luckey 20:54 I spent time in China back in the Oculus days because that's where we did our manufacturing, and we didn't really have a choice. I deeply understand how dependent our country has become on Chinese manufacturing, Chinese engineering, Chinese supply chain materials. It's really extraordinary how they've pulled themselves up from almost nothing to being an economic superpower, and we did this too. We're the ones that gave them the blueprints. We're the ones that gave them the tech. We're the ones that shipped it all overseas, and I'm part of the problem. I'm one of the guys who did it. What a [censored] hole.

Emily Chang 21:29 Do you worry that China is outpacing the US on technological innovation? Like could-

Palmer Luckey 21:35 Well-

Emily Chang 21:35 ... the US military lose itch, its edge to China?

Palmer Luckey 21:39 Well, depending on who you ask, China has between 50 times and 300 times the military shipbuilding capacity of the United States. This is a huge problem, especially if you're fighting a war where you lose all your ships and it takes you decades to rebuild. They lose all their ships, and they rebuild the same year. This is really inarguably an area where China has outpaced the United States. Now, they haven't outpaced us everywhere, but in a lot of the areas that matter for a fight in the Pacific, they are kicking our ass, and the United States is not gonna be able to win by following the same strategy they do. We're not gonna be able to build enough shipyards and train enough welders to build 300 times more ships. That's off the table, so we have to win with our brains.

22:24 – 29:12

Anduril’s growth reality, Luckey’s personal “arsenal,” and a closing warning about time

Emily Chang 22:24 Despite all its innovation, Anduril and other defense tech startups are still bit players in the world of military suppliers. Venture capitalists plowed in $100 billion between 2021 and 2023, but only a handful of companies have won meaningful contracts.

Palmer Luckey 22:43 Right now, Anduril's very much in a high-growth stage. We've done a lot of things that I'm very, very proud of.

Emily Chang 22:47 Mm-hmm.

Palmer Luckey 22:47 But I'm very aware of the fact that we are not a profitable business.

Emily Chang 22:52 Mm.

Palmer Luckey 22:52 We are living on borrowed time, and so I, I, I... It's hard for me to come and feel like I've made it when I know that, you know, anyone can raise money from VCs-

Emily Chang 23:02 Right

Palmer Luckey 23:02 ... buy a really big office, and fill it full of people. The question is, are those people building the right things, and will those things pay off?

Emily Chang 23:15 It's not your average Newport Beach boat.

Palmer Luckey 23:17 No, it's not.

Emily Chang 23:18 Is it?

Palmer Luckey 23:19 Most of my neighbors like it, and a handful hate it.

Emily Chang 23:22 [laughs]

Palmer Luckey 23:22 But that's good enough. We've got a mock M2 heavy-barrelled 50 BMG machine gun. I have real ones that I can, that I can throw on, but I, I, I keep, I keep the fake ones on most of the time. One of the other cool features of the boat is these shock-mounted seats. You'll notice they bounce up and down. So we're gonna go below deck into the navigator's room. This is also where we run all of our communications gear, processing gear, computer gear, radio gear. You've got all of your rifle racks here so that you can rack them up. So these are twin MTU engines. The boat's got a little over 5,000 horsepower. This whole thing's basically a big giant Jet Ski.

Emily Chang 24:11 So what else do you have in your personal arsenal?

Palmer Luckey 24:13 Oh, I got a whole bunch of stuff. Got a UH-60 Black Hawk, 1985 ex-Marine Corps Humvee.

Emily Chang 24:19 How many helicopters?

Palmer Luckey 24:21 I used to have seven, but I only have six now.

Emily Chang 24:24 I do hear that you have a vault where you have every video game-

Palmer Luckey 24:28 [laughs]

Emily Chang 24:29 ... ever created.

Palmer Luckey 24:30 A while ago, I purchased the world's largest video game collection, and I, I also collect US Air Force nuclear missile bases. So I put that in one of my missile bases 200 feet underground.

Emily Chang 24:41 Where is that?

Palmer Luckey 24:42 Oh, I can't tell you. All right. We're gonna do some turns. Everybody hold on.

Emily Chang 24:54 Ah. [laughs] All right. What was that?

Palmer Luckey 25:04 That was one of our own wakes, but we're gonna go find one of the other ones.

Emily Chang 25:07 Woo.

Palmer Luckey 25:08 Hold on.

Emily Chang 25:08 Ah. Ah. Woo. [laughs]

Palmer Luckey 25:17 Do you wanna try steering?

Emily Chang 25:18 Of course. [laughs]

Palmer Luckey 25:19 All right. We'll bring us down to zero. So as we accelerate, uh, you're gonna hear first the first turbocharger kicked in, and then after we get at about 20 knots, you're gonna hear the second turbocharger kick in, and that's when the engine changes pitch. I'm gonna try a starboard turn. You're gonna move your stick over to the right, and then watch your positions here.

Emily Chang 25:48 I'm turning a warship.

Palmer Luckey 25:51 When I say center, center. Center now. There you go.

Emily Chang 25:56 We're going fast, like the, the beach is approaching.

Palmer Luckey 26:00 All right. We're gonna do a, a, a little bit of a fast stop. You're gonna pull on the throttle. Just pull. Pull. Keep going. Give it... There we go. All right, leave it there. There you go.

Emily Chang 26:12 Oh my God. [laughs] So am I hired?

Palmer Luckey 26:17 No.

Emily Chang 26:20 You started Anduril in 2017, and you've lived through Silicon Valley in the era of ZIRP and easy money.

Palmer Luckey 26:27 Sure.

Emily Chang 26:27 What do you think about the frenzy?

Palmer Luckey 26:29 The zero interest rate phenomenon. Yeah, there's a lot of companies that shouldn't have existed. They never should've been funded. All that money went to paying people to do things that were a waste of time. I know lots of young founders who were working on crypto art nonsense and a fifth delivery app or a 10th delivery app, and now that money has become harder to come by, you know what they're working on? They're working on energy.

Emily Chang 26:52 Mm.

Palmer Luckey 26:53 They're working on national security. They're working on transportation and, uh, I, I think that, I, like, I see people working on real problems because the market forced them to-

Emily Chang 27:03 Mm

Palmer Luckey 27:03 ... and that's a good thing in my opinion.

Emily Chang 27:04 So it's time to build?

Palmer Luckey 27:05 It's time to build.

Emily Chang 27:12 The war in Ukraine, it's been two years now. How are we gonna look back on it?

Palmer Luckey 27:17 Well, I think that we're gonna look back on it as one of the best examples of the hubris of the modern era. Thinking that we lived at the end of history, the end of conflict, that large scale war was a thing of the past, that artillery is irrelevant, that manpower is irrelevant, that sternly worded letters from the United Nations mean anything at all to expansionist dictators like Putin or Xi, that's, I think, gonna be the legacy of this fight.

Emily Chang 27:43 Is the US government working fast enough to, like, foster the agility we need to s- to survive or win global conflicts?

Palmer Luckey 27:50 It depends on what kinds of fights we fight. Hopefully we have enough time. Uh, we might not.

Emily Chang 27:55 Why not?

Palmer Luckey 27:56 Well, let's say that China starts making moves on Taiwan and moves on other countries in the next 24 months. I think we're gonna be in trouble. I think in 36 months, 48 months, we're actually still kind of in trouble. If it takes long enough, I think that the United States military has recognized the problem. Uh, but, you know, like you're steering this boat, when you turned, how long did it take for the boat to respond? A while.

Emily Chang 28:21 It, it was a bit of a lag time.

Palmer Luckey 28:22 The US military's the same way. It's a large machine. It takes a long time to move, even once you've applied the control, even if once you've applied the input. I think that's the phase we're in. The government has realized the problem, they've applied the input, we're waiting for the system to adjust. [upbeat music]

Episode duration: 29:12

In the uListen app, the transcript lights up word by word as you listen. Get uListen

Transcript of episode ItLFpYha6Wc

Get more out of YouTube videos.

Read along on your phone, search it beside the video, or ask your favorite AI app what was said.