Skip to content
Dalton + MichaelDalton + Michael

Cofounder Relationships

In this episode of Dalton + Michael, the two discuss one if the most important topics in the life of a startup founder: cofounder relationships. Discussion includes: if you should even have a cofounder, how to disagree with your cofounder and have conflict without blowing up your company, how to know when to part ways and more. The most rewarding relationships in life aren't necessarily easy, but they are surely worth the effort it takes to maintain them. Dalton + Michael is brought to you by @Standard_Cap Dalton Caldwell on X: https://x.com/daltonc Michael Seibel on X: https://x.com/mwseibel

Dalton Caldwellhost
Jul 13, 202622mWatch on YouTube ↗

EVERY SPOKEN WORD

  1. 0:000:37

    Why “no cofounder” isn’t a real solution to cofounder risk

    1. DC

      I think a lot of founders have heard horror stories about cofounder breakups, and their takeaway is like, "Oh, I'm a genius. I'm just not gonna have a cofounder. Oh, I fixed the problem." [laughs]

    2. SP

      I pre-fixed the problem. [laughs]

    3. DC

      Dalton. [laughs] That's the best sort of fix.

    4. SP

      This is Dalton + Michael, and today we're gonna talk about cofounder fights and cofounder breakups. We have a lot of experience in both of these. [laughs]

    5. DC

      [laughs] Should we start with breakups first or fights first? Where, where, where do you wanna... What's logical? Let's start at the beginning. Um, cofounders.

    6. SP

      Okay.

  2. 0:373:10

    What cofounders are for: mission, feedback loops, and “pooled faith”

    1. DC

      What do we even mean by cofounders?

    2. SP

      Yes.

    3. DC

      So traditionally, when you start a tech startup-

    4. SP

      Yes

    5. DC

      ... you don't do it by yourself. And if you look to history of how a lot of the biggest companies started, um, they tended to have cofounders. I guess there's examples of families, so I'm thinking of non-tech companies-

    6. SP

      Sure

    7. DC

      ... where you started with your family.

    8. SP

      Sure.

    9. DC

      But usually there was, you know, another person, like the canonical Steve Jobs. [laughs]

    10. SP

      Yes.

    11. DC

      Steve Wozniak.

    12. SP

      Yep.

    13. DC

      It was, it was two people.

    14. SP

      Yes.

    15. DC

      Maybe to start by addressing that, I think a lot of founders have heard horror stories about cofounder breakups, which we're about to talk about in a second.

    16. SP

      Yes.

    17. DC

      And their takeaway is like, "Oh, I'm a genius. I'm just not gonna have a cofounder. Oh, I fixed the problem." [laughs]

    18. SP

      I pre-fixed the problem. [laughs]

    19. DC

      Dalton. [laughs] That's the best sort of fix. And it's like, man, you guys sure spend a lot of time talking about cofounder problems.

    20. SP

      Have you even thought of my genius solution? [laughs]

    21. DC

      You know, I'm a genius. Um, l- again, let's address that. Let's, let's steel man that argument. It is true that if you remove a cofounder-

    22. SP

      [laughs]

    23. DC

      ... the odds that you will get in a cofounder dispute dip to zero.

    24. SP

      Yes. Clever. [laughs]

    25. DC

      [laughs] However, there are many things in life where I think they're a good idea, but they involve taking a risk, and they don't have 100% success rate. Getting married.

    26. SP

      Sure. Having kids.

    27. DC

      Having kids.

    28. SP

      Kids who like you. [laughs]

    29. DC

      [laughs] Yeah. Taking any kind of risk. I don't know.

    30. SP

      Sure.

  3. 3:103:40

    Single-founder success still recreates “cofounder-like” relationships

    1. DC

      Let's put it this way. We know a lot of the single founders that have been successful as well.

    2. SP

      Yes.

    3. DC

      And sometimes we funded them at YC.

    4. SP

      Yes.

    5. DC

      All of those people created cofounder-like-

    6. SP

      Relationships

    7. DC

      ... environments and relationships-

    8. SP

      Yes

    9. DC

      ... that did fill the void.

    10. SP

      Yes.

    11. DC

      So whether it was employees, whether it was advisors-

    12. SP

      Yes

    13. DC

      ... whether it was friends, there was no way you can get around not having someone to talk to all the time to bounce ideas off of.

    14. SP

      No.

    15. DC

      Right?

    16. SP

      No.

    17. DC

      Everything together.

    18. SP

      And I feel like those stories are just, like, because they don't make the headline story, they're not told.

    19. DC

      Yeah.

  4. 3:404:55

    How cofounder fights start: friendship vs. transactional dynamics

    1. SP

      But I completely agree with you. So what happens when you are fighting with your cofounder? In my experience, there are two realities: You are friends with this person, or you are not friends with this person. What I have found is when you are friends with your cofounder, there will be something in the startup that happens that will frustrate the hell out of you, and you will have a particularly harsh thing that you wanna say. But because you're friends with this person, more often than not, you're not gonna say it, or you're gonna put it slightly differently, or you're gonna ask yourself, "If I were on the receiving end of this, would this motivate me or not?" Unfortunately, when you're not friends with this person, sometimes it's easier just to boom, boom, fire, fire, and then that can create problems.

    2. DC

      Yeah.

    3. SP

      That can create real problems. So that's probably the first thing that I see with a cofounder fight, is when it's initiated stupidly, right? Like, you're gonna have to fight about some stuff, but it's just like, can we avoid the dumb ones, you know? Like, "Oh, these guys raised money. Why couldn't you go raise money?" So I think that's a big one. Where else are you seeing cofounder fights?

  5. 4:556:31

    The biggest root cause: becoming cofounders for the wrong reasons (low trust)

    1. DC

      The biggest root cause is that you end up getting into the relationship for the wrong reasons. And so for better or worse, I can't help but think that all human relationships are fundamentally similar in some ways.

    2. SP

      Sure. Sure.

    3. DC

      Not always. [laughs]

    4. SP

      For sure.

    5. DC

      But, you know, if, if you end up getting thrown into a pretty intense experience with a complete stranger, and you've taken no time to understand the other person, the chances that you'll have a disagreement are pretty high. You just don't even have the same context.

    6. SP

      Yes.

    7. DC

      Um, and so the biggest issue I see is that they don't even... It's like strangers trying to navigate the beginning part of a relationship, and then it sort of dawns on them, "Oh man, this person's a stranger, and I got into this relationship for the wrong reasons."

    8. SP

      Yes.

    9. DC

      Um-

    10. SP

      "And I'm mad at myself. Let me do some lashing out."

    11. DC

      Yeah. And so what that looks like in practice is you can't even agree on really basic stuff.

    12. SP

      Yes.

    13. DC

      Such as the name of the company.

    14. SP

      Sure. Sure.

    15. DC

      Such as what idea are we working on?

    16. SP

      Yes.

    17. DC

      Such as what- ... should I be doing with my time and what should you be doing with your time?

    18. SP

      It's interesting 'cause, like, there's almost no basis for there being trust.

    19. DC

      Yeah.

    20. SP

      And if there's no trust, we can fight about everything. [laughs]

    21. DC

      Anything. [laughs] Just, just throw something out there.

    22. SP

      Forever.

    23. DC

      Yeah. [laughs]

    24. SP

      You can have endless arguments-

    25. DC

      Yeah

    26. SP

      ... about everything.

    27. DC

      Yeah. [laughs] And especially 'cause you're the boss, right? Like, everything's on the table. [laughs]

    28. SP

      Yeah.

    29. DC

      [laughs]

  6. 6:317:10

    The “equal value at all times” myth and resentment about effort

    1. SP

      So no, I totally agree with that one. I think another thing that was a misconception that I had was that each cofounder is going to add an equal amount of value at all times. And I see a lot of resentment build up when somebody feels like, "Oh, I'm grinding and my cofounder's not," as if, like, we're all working on the car factory line-

    2. DC

      Mm

    3. SP

      ... and anyone who's not working, the, the cars aren't moving through. It hasn't been my experience things are always exactly that way. What, what's been your experience?

  7. 7:108:19

    Mutual respect is the real issue beneath surface arguments

    1. DC

      Yeah, I mean, there has to be a mutual respect.

    2. SP

      Yes.

    3. DC

      And what happens is there's all these superficial things in an office hours that someone will wanna talk about, and then you just keep digging and digging and digging and digging. And at the bottom is, "I don't respect the job or the thing that this person is doing."

    4. SP

      Mm-hmm.

    5. DC

      And that it doesn't really matter what all the upper layers are.

    6. SP

      No.

    7. DC

      It's pretty hard to fix that if at the core is a, is a lack of, of mutual respect.

    8. SP

      One of the things amongst friends that can create that respect is, "I feel like I'm working hard-

    9. DC

      Yes

    10. SP

      ... and I don't feel like you are." And it was funny. In, in my first company, we had four cofounders. And looking back, what I tell founders a lot is at any given time I think we had two and a half cofounders.

    11. DC

      [laughs]

    12. SP

      And, you know, that means, like, one and a half people were probably not engaged in the core thing moving the company forward at that time.

    13. DC

      Yeah.

    14. SP

      And only over years did I kind of see how that all balanced out, and it wasn't always-

    15. DC

      You know-

    16. SP

      ... the same one and a half people. [laughs]

  8. 8:199:14

    Don’t cargo-cult cofounder structures: make what you have work

    1. DC

      And this makes me think of, like, a- another point we touched on a minute ago. But look, man, just like relationships-

    2. SP

      Yeah

    3. DC

      ... everyone else's is different, and if you try to stand in judgment of how other people made it work-

    4. SP

      Yeah

    5. DC

      ... you're wasting your time.

    6. SP

      Yes.

    7. DC

      And so some people will be like, "Michael, you were four founders and, you know, you had Emmett and, you know-

    8. SP

      Yeah

    9. DC

      ... blah, blah." You know, that has nothing to do with my startup. It's like-

    10. SP

      Hmm. [laughs]

    11. DC

      What, what, what I'm going with this is you're right. That is different.

    12. SP

      Yes.

    13. DC

      But it worked for them.

    14. SP

      Yes.

    15. DC

      And you built Twitch.

    16. SP

      Yeah.

    17. DC

      You built an enduring thing that still lives on and is bigger than all of you guys.

    18. SP

      Yes, yes.

    19. DC

      And so if you wanna build a big company that's bigger [laughs] -

    20. SP

      Yeah

    21. DC

      ... than, than all of you individually, don't assume you can just blindly copy or cargo cult another person's playbook-

    22. SP

      No

    23. DC

      ... and it'll necessarily work for you.

    24. SP

      No.

    25. DC

      And so to me, the biggest learning from your cofounding experience is you guys made it work versus you must have four cofounders and they must be this and you must act this way.

    26. SP

      Yeah. No, no, no.

    27. DC

      Right?

  9. 9:1410:07

    When a fight is actually a breakup: recognizing “trust is destroyed”

    1. SP

      No, no. So let's move into it's not gonna work. I think there's an interesting transition between cofounders fighting, which I think, you know, is gonna happen, and cofounders fighting that when we're talking to them we know-

    2. DC

      Yeah

    3. SP

      ... they're gonna break up before they break up. We know the trust is destroyed. I think that's a really important time in a startup because I, I always fear with startups, like, when you really know the probability of success is zero, the most important thing is to stop wasting time. And, you know, sometimes I see people living in this, like, "We haven't decided we're gonna break up yet, but obviously-

    4. DC

      But we definitely are. [laughs]

    5. SP

      Yeah. [laughs] But, like, everything is dysfunctional. It's not gonna get repaired, and it's like, can we get through that phase-

    6. DC

      Yeah

    7. SP

      ... as quickly as possible? [laughs] Like...

  10. 10:0711:15

    YC office-hours pattern: private meetings to “present the case” (don’t do it)

    1. DC

      Yeah. I mean, what this looked like to me in office hours with a, with a YC company is they would wanna meet with me without the other person.

    2. SP

      Oh my God.

    3. DC

      And they'd basically wanna present some facts.

    4. SP

      About why that person sucks or this.

    5. DC

      About why... Yeah.

    6. SP

      Yeah, yeah.

    7. DC

      And so kind of what I learned to do after many years of this is to say, "The facts don't matter. I am not the judge and jury. You don't need to present the case to me. If you don't think it's gonna work and it's bad enough such that you're trying to meet with me and present facts to me, that sounds pretty bad. I think this is pretty far gone." And so counterintuitively, I think, I'd be like, "Let's not talk about the facts. It doesn't actually matter. Let's just try to create a go-forward plan that is the most positive for all parties involved to not work together anymore-

    8. SP

      Yes

    9. DC

      ... so that everyone feels good about how they were treated, they feel good about the process.

    10. SP

      Yes.

    11. DC

      There wasn't a lot of, like, legal threats or problems. You just go your separate ways, and there's not, like, um, permanent toxic waste in the relationship. You're just like, "Cool, we're just gonna go our separate ways," and everyone is gonna be okay with it.

    12. SP

      Yes.

    13. DC

      Um, that's what I learned to do, and it works a lot if people are super professional and adult about it.

  11. 11:1513:43

    Why lawyers can make it worse pre-PMF: fighting over nothing

    1. SP

      I think the thing that always frustrated me when giving office hours on this topic was how unhelpful third parties can be.

    2. DC

      Yep.

    3. SP

      Um, you know, cofounder breakups extremely common with pre-product market fit early-stage companies, right? Another way of saying a pre-product farket- market early stage is, like, it has created no value. So, like, the stock that you have is worthless.

    4. DC

      Correct.

    5. SP

      You have nothing. And so in a situation where you're having a cofounder breakup and the stock is worth nothing, paying lawyers a bunch of money makes no sense.

    6. DC

      It's idiotic. Well, you're fighting over nothing. You're fighting over ego. So-

    7. SP

      You're spending money. [laughs]

    8. DC

      [laughs] Over nothing.

    9. SP

      I don't mind if you fight. Can you just also not spend-

    10. DC

      Yeah

    11. SP

      ... money with your lawyers to fight? And, you know, the lawyer is trained- Well, there's a .00000001% chance this becomes Google.

    12. DC

      Yeah.

    13. SP

      And so you need to fight, like... And it's like, sorry, when, when there's infinite O's, like, after the decimal point, it means there's no chance it becomes Google. It means you're fighting over something that's nothing, not worth anything. And the problem is, is that a lawyer can suck up infinite amount of your-

    14. DC

      Yep

    15. SP

      ... anger and monetize it. It makes me feel dirty just saying that out loud.

    16. DC

      It's true.

    17. SP

      That's what that's, that's-

    18. DC

      That's the, it's a service provider. Oh, the client wanted services, which is to write mean letters to the former co-founder. [laughs] That's a service.

    19. SP

      And I, I will provide it. [laughs]

    20. DC

      Yeah.

    21. SP

      And so the number of times I then see founders in the situation where it's like, oh, crap, like, not only are we in a deeper fight, but we now have, like, debt. I've seen situations where an individual founder who's leaving has debt-

    22. DC

      Yeah

    23. SP

      ... on a, on a company that's not worth anything.

    24. DC

      Yeah.

    25. SP

      And like, man, I hope your feelings feel better, 'cause, like, your bank account is gonna suffer. So a lot of what we've tried to do at YC is kind of create, like, a basic framework w- to deal with these breakups. And, like, what I love about giving these office hours is, you know, at OIC, we have these written down.

    26. DC

      Yep.

    27. SP

      So it was like, I, you know that I didn't, I'm not taking a side.

    28. DC

      [laughs]

    29. SP

      I didn't invent this. Like, you can post fact-check me.

    30. DC

      Oh. [laughs] Oh, Jesus.

  12. 13:4314:43

    A “no-fault, clean breakup” standard: silence, professionalism, and vesting

    1. SP

      And maybe we should talk about some of these standards, some of these, like, hey, how a co-founder breakup should go.

    2. DC

      So again, to start with, the way it should go is sort of no fault from both sides.

    3. SP

      Yes.

    4. DC

      And so, again, unless you catch them committing a felony, okay-

    5. SP

      Yeah

    6. DC

      ... that's, that's, uh, outside the scope of this conversation.

    7. SP

      Yes.

    8. DC

      But for the most part, make it no fault.

    9. SP

      Yes.

    10. DC

      Don't try to ruin the other person. Don't try to ruin their reputation. Don't try to contact the investors and all this other crap.

    11. SP

      No, no.

    12. DC

      So make it no fault.

    13. SP

      Yes.

    14. DC

      Optimize for cleanliness for both sides-

    15. SP

      Yes

    16. DC

      ... so it requires the least amount of mental angst and anger to separate ways.

    17. SP

      Yes.

    18. DC

      Make it so that you don't say things you can't take back.

    19. SP

      Yes.

    20. DC

      Preserve the ability to interact with them in the future, any employees.

    21. SP

      Yes.

    22. DC

      You know?

    23. SP

      Yes.

    24. DC

      Keep your mouth shut, basically, both parties should.

    25. SP

      Yes.

    26. DC

      And then vesting is good. Uh, hopefully you have vesting.

    27. SP

      Yes.

    28. DC

      Um, vesting protects both parties in this case-

    29. SP

      Yes

    30. DC

      ... because it makes it cleaner to separate.

  13. 14:4315:38

    Equity realism: leaving founder should give back to motivate the team

    1. SP

      Yes. I think that oftentimes what we tell founders is that if you're pre-product market fit, and the company's gonna continue operating, and you're the leaving party, you have to understand that the vast majority of the value this company could create hasn't been created yet.

    2. DC

      Yep.

    3. SP

      And so regardless of your vesting, um, you need to make sure that that company has as much equity as possible to motivate the people who are there, the people that might be hired, to come create value. I often talk to that person first, and I basically am saying, "You get to go and live your life, and that company, if it ever creates value, you're gonna get some money for it-

    4. DC

      Yep

    5. SP

      ... even though you don't have to contribute to it at any time." Like, you get the hedge. The founder staying doesn't. Make sure the founder staying has as much incentive as humanly possible-

    6. DC

      Yep

    7. SP

      ... to try to make that thing valuable. [laughs] Because, like-

  14. 15:3816:50

    Reputation and infinite games: scorched earth hurts your career, not your lawyer

    1. DC

      Well, and again, it reminds me of the-

    2. SP

      ... it's free option

    3. DC

      ... the lawyer thing, which is legal advice for certain types of advisors will be, like, trying to help you craft the ways to maximally screw the other party and extract every penny of value, and basically just, like, scorched earth-

    4. SP

      Literally

    5. DC

      ... the situation.

    6. SP

      Yes.

    7. DC

      And guess what? They will take your money to go do that.

    8. SP

      Yes.

    9. DC

      And then their reputation does not suffer because they are lawyers.

    10. SP

      No.

    11. DC

      Whereas you are still, you have a career-

    12. SP

      Yes

    13. DC

      ... and everyone will remember you from doing the scorched earth thing. And so I would encourage people to think about this as, like, a game theory, infinite games situation, which is if you handle this unremarkably in a good way, like if you do- [laughs]

    14. SP

      Yeah

    15. DC

      ... if you're unremarkable and it's like, "Oh, yeah, I worked, we, we worked together. It didn't work out. I went and did my own thing, and it was no big deal," very good for your career.

    16. SP

      Yes.

    17. DC

      But being known as the super litigious scorched earth person, you're never gonna work again.

    18. SP

      Nope.

    19. DC

      And your lawyer's not gonna tell you that.

    20. SP

      Nope.

    21. DC

      [laughs] And so if you're just thinking about this, this is actually going on your permanent record-

    22. SP

      Yes

    23. DC

      ... that you were, like, cool about it and didn't-

    24. SP

      Yes

    25. DC

      ... cause a lot of problems, and is likely, like, the most important takeaway from this part, right, man?

  15. 16:5019:42

    Generosity from the staying founder: severance, morale, and leadership signal

    1. SP

      I completely agree. And I think that for the founder who's staying, I, I always try to reframe it in their head because I think oftentimes anyone who feels bad, like, the first instinct is to make yourself the victim.

    2. DC

      Yep.

    3. SP

      And I'm kind of like, well, that person's leaving and you're staying, so it's like-

    4. DC

      [laughs]

    5. SP

      They prob- like, like, you know, like, let's not debate victims, but, like-

    6. DC

      [laughs]

    7. SP

      ... I, you probably don't deserve the-

    8. DC

      Who's the bigger victim?

    9. SP

      Yeah. [laughs]

    10. DC

      Let's have that debate, Michael. Michael, please tell us. Please take my side-

    11. SP

      [laughs]

    12. DC

      ... um, about what a victim I am.

    13. SP

      Yes, like what, what I'm experiencing, right? [laughs] And w- w- what I often tell that person is you have an opportunity to be generous, um, especially, like, if you've got funding, when it comes to severance. Like, you have an opportunity to make sure that that co-founder who's leaving can get back on their feet, live their life, go move on to the next thing. And your incentive to do it is, one, if this is your friend, like, you want your friend to be okay, right? And then two, understand that everyone in your company is looking at you-

    14. DC

      Yep

    15. SP

      ... right now. And, like, this is the person who, at least theoretically, you trusted the most. How you treat them, will you treat anyone else better? And it is so cheap to be nice. [laughs]

    16. DC

      [laughs]

    17. SP

      And, and it creates so many positive dividends amongst the other people who are staying. But it's very, very hard to be nice when you think of yourself as the victim. Right? When you're the victim, then it's like, well, that person has what's coming to them. And I would say that if you think of yourself as the responsible party and you act that way, often you don't trigger victimness on the other side, too. Whereas, like, so often I'll see the lawyers be like, "Well, you better protect yourself because, like, they might come after you."

    18. DC

      Yep.

    19. SP

      And you inadvertently, the founder who's staying, triggers the fight.

    20. DC

      Yes.

    21. SP

      And you're just like, "What are you doing?" [laughs] Like, we generally tell people, "Hey, even if you vested, like, get down to under 5% of the company. If it's within the first year, under 2%. Do reasonable severance, sign clean paperwork, and, and peace out," right? Like, you could do that whole thing in a week.

    22. DC

      Yep.

    23. SP

      And spend, like, $2,000. If you're not doing that, it's like you're taking a very hard route. Um, and I would say that, like, it's really, really important in these fights, just make sure no one's taking advantage of you. Any time you're spending money, be worried that someone's [laughs] taking advantage.

    24. DC

      If there's a, yeah, if there's a service provider-

    25. SP

      If there's a bill

    26. DC

      ... that is excited to offer you services, and there's a bill, and they're paid for their time and not ...

    27. SP

      Hmm.

    28. DC

      Yeah.

    29. SP

      Ugh.

    30. DC

      That's an issue. [laughs]

  16. 19:4222:45

    Final playbook and mindset: don’t litigate the past; make it a footnote

    1. SP

      Yeah. Here's my last piece of advice. It, it comes back to what you were saying before. Who, if you're using someone to mediate this, don't make them the judge. Don't make them-

    2. DC

      Because it doesn't matter.

    3. SP

      It doesn't matter.

    4. DC

      If you're not gonna work together anymore-

    5. SP

      It doesn't matter

    6. DC

      ... it doesn't actually matter what happened.

    7. SP

      No.

    8. DC

      It's irrelevant.

    9. SP

      No. No.

    10. DC

      Right?

    11. SP

      No. And, like, come on. It was a startup. The expected outcome.

    12. DC

      [laughs]

    13. SP

      Like, this is the expected outcome. [laughs] Like, don't, don't treat this like it's Google breaking up-

    14. DC

      Yep

    15. SP

      ... when it's not Google breaking up. And I think oftentimes service providers, in their minds, they're like, "Company, public company."

    16. DC

      And I would kind of bring this back to one of the original points I made on this one, which is if you handle this well, this is a non-mortal wound. Like, part of the reason there's so much, "I never wanna have a cofounder because I heard my friend and this happened to them and blah, blah, blah,"-

    17. SP

      It's this stupid bullshit

    18. DC

      ... is 'cause it was handled horribly.

    19. SP

      Yes. Yes. Yes.

    20. DC

      And if you handle this well-

    21. SP

      Yes

    22. DC

      ... this is a footnote in both of your careers.

    23. SP

      Yes.

    24. DC

      This is a footnote in the history of the company, right?

    25. SP

      Yes.

    26. DC

      Apple had a third cofounder. Remember that guy?

    27. SP

      Yeah.

    28. DC

      And then they bought him out and then-

    29. SP

      Yeah

    30. DC

      ... like, it was fine.

Episode duration: 22:47

Install uListen for AI-powered chat & search across the full episode — Get Full Transcript

Transcript of episode s1YszjhzQ6U

Get more out of YouTube videos.

High quality summaries for YouTube videos. Accurate transcripts to search & find moments. Powered by ChatGPT & Claude AI.