Skip to content
The Joe Rogan ExperienceThe Joe Rogan Experience

Joe Rogan Experience #1386 - Matt Taibbi

Matt Taibbi is a journalist and author. He has reported on politics, media, finance, and sports, and has authored several books including his latest "Hate, Inc.: Why Today's Media Makes Us Despise One Another" is available now & look for his podcast "Useful Idiots" is available at RollingStone.com https://www.amazon.com/Hate-Inc-Todays-Despise-Another/dp/1949017257

Joe RoganhostMatt Taibbiguest
Nov 16, 20192h 5mWatch on YouTube ↗

EVERY SPOKEN WORD

  1. 0:001:51

    Hidden acrostic tweetstorm: “Epstein didn’t kill himself” and meme politics

    1. JR

      Ooh. So Jamie pointed out ... (laughs)

    2. NA

      (laughs)

    3. JR

      This, this, uh, congressman, is that who it is?

    4. NA

      Yeah.

    5. JR

      Ja- Jamie pointed this out that there's a congressman and he released a series of tweets. And the first letter of all these tweets, if you put them all together, it says, "Epstein didn't kill himself," or "did not kill himself." Is that what it is?

    6. NA

      It's didn't, he did the (bleep) I'll pull it up. (laughs) Yeah.

    7. MT

      How do you do the apostrophe?

    8. NA

      Yeah, I can't. So like-

    9. JR

      You should've gone with "did not."

    10. NA

      ... starting here with that evidence of a link. And then there's the E.

    11. JR

      Rep. Paul Gosar. What are the odds that this guy did this accidentally? R- really small, right?

    12. MT

      Yeah. That's kinda like one of those monkey's typing Shakespeare things.

    13. JR

      Yeah.

    14. MT

      Yeah, I don't think it could, uh, it could work.

    15. NA

      Accidentally.

    16. JR

      And the thing is, he did it backwards, right?

    17. NA

      I see.

    18. JR

      So you didn't see what the puzzle was until the last tweet.

    19. NA

      Who caught that?

    20. JR

      Because the last tweet is an E.

    21. NA

      I got a tweet from someone about 35 minutes ago that I don't know if there's a bunch of people online paying attention to it or what, but someone alerted me and a few other people of it.

    22. JR

      What, is he, does he have an image of that fucking, that crazy mask? Is that in his shit too? Okay. He's a weirdo.

    23. NA

      Yeah, that might be the H of the-

    24. JR

      He's got the ...

    25. NA

      But that's all, that was November 1st, so.

    26. MT

      (laughs) The V mask?

    27. JR

      Yes.

    28. MT

      Yeah.

    29. JR

      What, what is that mask again? What does it represent?

    30. MT

      V for Vendetta.

  2. 1:512:38

    Epstein’s death as a media “black hole” story

    1. JR

      Well, this Epstein case is probably the most blatant example of a public murder of, of a crucial witness I've ever seen in my entire life or anybody's ever seen. And the, the, the minimal amount of outrage about this, the minimal-

    2. MT

      Oh.

    3. JR

      ... minimal amount of cover, it's fucking fascinating.

    4. MT

      I mean, I ... What's amazing to me just as a, you know, somebody who works in the media is that this was shaping up to be the biggest, like, news story in history.

    5. JR

      Yes.

    6. MT

      And the instant he, you know, he died, uh, or was died or however you wanna call it-

    7. JR

      Yeah.

    8. MT

      ... um, it, the story just fell off the face of the earth.

    9. JR

      Yes.

    10. MT

      Because it's like nobody's doing anything about it. And I, I don't 100% understand that. I mean, I, I get it why, why that's happening, but it's, uh, it- it's just amazing to watch.

  3. 2:384:12

    Why news organizations kill stories: incentives, access, and “cellular-level” self-censorship

    1. JR

      Well, when the woman from ABC ... What was her name?

    2. NA

      Amy ...

    3. JR

      Amy Rohr ... uh-huh, that lady. The, the one who ...

    4. NA

      Robach.

    5. JR

      Robach.

    6. MT

      Robach, yeah.

    7. JR

      Who had the frustrated moment that she called it, a frustrating private moment.

    8. MT

      Right.

    9. JR

      When she was talking about having the scoop and having that story and them squashing it.

    10. MT

      Right.

    11. JR

      Like, this, this is all stuff that everybody used to think was conspiracy. Every- everybody used to think this was stoner talk. This was, you know ...

    12. MT

      (laughs)

    13. JR

      You know what I mean? Like, this is, this is stuff where people just delusional, they believe all kinds of wacky conspiracies.

    14. MT

      Sure.

    15. JR

      But the reality is much less complicated. Well, this is not possible. This is one of those things that's so obvious, it's so in everyone's face.

    16. MT

      Well, there's a couple things going on 'cause there, there are many different ways this can play out. I mean, you could have a news director who just sort of instinctively decides, "Well, we can't do that story because I might want to have Will and Kate on later," or, "I might want to have this politician on later." And it's, it's not like anybody tells them necessarily that we can't do this, but they-

    17. JR

      They just decide it's too hot.

    18. MT

      If you grow up in this system and you've been in the, the business for a long time y- you just, you have all these things that are drilled into you at almost like the cellular level-

    19. JR

      Mm-hmm.

    20. MT

      ... about what you can and cannot get into. And, um, I think there, but there were some expli- explicit things that happened with Epstein too. I mean, they ... there, there were a lot of news agencies that killed stories about him that, you know, and we're hearing about some of them, Vanity Fair, this thing, you know, so yeah. It's, it's, it's, it's bad.

    21. JR

      It's terrible.

    22. MT

      Yeah, yeah.

  4. 4:127:45

    What was Epstein really doing? Blackmail theories, intelligence hints, and the mystery money

    1. JR

      When, when I found out that Clinton flew no less than 26 times on a plane with Epstein, I was like, "Dude, I haven't flown that many times with my mom."

    2. MT

      (laughs) Right.

    3. JR

      How long did he know Epstein?

    4. MT

      Yeah, I, I don't know, but I mean, to have that many flights, to have the Secret Service, uh, people involved, I mean, that's incredibly bold. Uh-

    5. JR

      What was he doing? It was just girls? Was, is, is, is Clinton that much of a hound that he would go that deep into the well that many times, 26 times?

    6. MT

      Well, that's the thing about the Epstein story that makes no sense to me. Like, I, I thought that the percentage of people who were out and out, like, perverts who had a serious problem, like with pedophilia or whatever it was, was pretty small, you know.

    7. JR

      Yeah.

    8. MT

      But you're, but they had a lot of people coming in and out of this compound and, and it just seems like it's a, um, it's a very strange story. What were they really up to? I have, I have no idea. And was, was it all a blackmail scheme? It's just, it's just so strange.

    9. JR

      Well, it seems like the pedophilia aspect of it might be directly connected to Epstein himself.

    10. MT

      Mm-hmm.

    11. JR

      Like, he might be the one that has a problem with girls that are, like, 16 and he likes them very young or he-

    12. MT

      Mm-hmm.

    13. JR

      ... did like them. But with the other guys, it could just be girls.

    14. MT

      It could be, yeah.

    15. JR

      I mean, that's why it's so crazy. Like, how could it be that these ... but maybe it's not.

    16. MT

      But they must ... but they knew who he was.

    17. JR

      Yeah. But they probably didn't know the extent of it.

    18. MT

      Probably not, yeah. Uh, uh, up until a point.

    19. JR

      Up until he was arrested.

    20. MT

      Right.

    21. JR

      And then they're like, "Oh." Well, then, then that's when everybody backed off of him, right?

    22. MT

      Yes. Yeah. I mean, I'm not 100%-

    23. JR

      I don't know either.

    24. MT

      Yeah. I, I haven't covered this story in depth. I've only, I only really got into it a little bit when-

    25. JR

      We need you.

    26. MT

      (laughs)

    27. JR

      We need you on this one. You're the guy.

    28. MT

      (laughs)

    29. JR

      (laughs)

    30. MT

      This is a tough one. I mean-

  5. 7:458:59

    When a conspiracy explanation feels unavoidable: cameras, hyoid bone, and autopsy claims

    1. JR

      So unfortunate that the cameras died. Uh, so unfortunate he sustained an injury that's, uh, that you usually only get through strangulation.

    2. MT

      Right. Yeah.

    3. JR

      When someone murders you.

    4. MT

      And he fell on the ground and accidentally broke his hyoid bone.

    5. JR

      Yeah.

    6. MT

      Happens all the time. (laughs) Right.

    7. JR

      Whatever. No big deal.

    8. MT

      I mean, it's so bizarre. Um, I, I can't stand cons- conspiracy theories. I'm one of these people who, who doesn't like reading it. But I can't-

    9. JR

      No.

    10. MT

      ... I can't make this story work in a way that isn't, you know-

    11. JR

      Yeah.

    12. MT

      ... conspiratorial in some way.

    13. JR

      Well, that's the thing. It's like, it gets to a point where you're like, "Okay." Even Michael Shermer, who runs Skeptic Magazine-

    14. MT

      Mm-hmm.

    15. JR

      He's like, "Wait a minute. The cameras were not working?"

    16. MT

      Yeah. I mean, it's like a bad excuse.

    17. JR

      Like, "Okay. Well, this, this seems like a conspiracy." Fucking when Michael Shermer says asso-

    18. MT

      Right.

    19. JR

      He, that guy doesn't believe in anything.

    20. MT

      Right. Right.

    21. JR

      I mean, he is fucking, he's down the line on virtually every single thing that's ever happened. He doesn't believe in any conspiracies.

    22. MT

      Well, well, how do you ... What's the innocent explanation for any of this? Yeah, you, you-

    23. JR

      There's none. It doesn't make any sense.

    24. MT

      You can't, you can't spin it in any way to make it not a re- a, a crazy conspiracy theory.

    25. JR

      Especially when the, the brother hires a doctor to do an autopsy-

    26. MT

      Oh, yeah.

    27. JR

      ... and the doctor says-

    28. MT

      Baden.

    29. JR

      ... "This guy was fucking murdered."

    30. MT

      Right.

  6. 8:5911:15

    Bipartisan scandals don’t sell: the press prefers partisan villains

    1. MT

      Craziness. Complete craziness. And, you know, it's, it's an example of, of, um, uh, you know ... The, the Epstein story is interesting because it's, because it's about villains on both sides of the aisle, right?

    2. JR

      Yeah.

    3. MT

      This is a classic ... This is something I've written about before, is that the press does not like to do stories where the problem is bipartisan.

    4. JR

      Yes.

    5. MT

      Right? So when you have an institutional problem, when Democrats and Republicans both share responsibility for it, when, you know, or, or if it's an institution that kind of exists in perpetuity no matter what the administration is, we don't really like to do those stories. We like ... If ... Fox likes to do stories about Democrats, S- MSNBC likes to do stories about Republicans. But the, the thing that's kind of, you know, all over the place, they don't like to do that story. Epstein is, you know, he's, he's friends with Trump and, and with Clinton. I mean-

    6. JR

      Yeah.

    7. MT

      ... looks like he has more friends on the Clinton side, but still. And I think that's ... this is one of the reasons why this story doesn't have a lot of traction in the media, because neither side really likes the idea of going too deeply on it.

    8. JR

      Right.

    9. MT

      Feels like to me.

    10. JR

      Well, it's ... But the, the, the blatant aspect of it, the only, I mean, the closest that we have to that is w- uh, absolute murder, the Jamal Khashoggi murder.

    11. MT

      Mm-hmm.

    12. JR

      That's the closest thing we have to where it's like absolute murder.

    13. MT

      Right.

    14. JR

      This one ... But it, but it's also so insanely blatant, but now you have foreign actors that are involved in it and they all disperse and then there's ... left with this confusion of to who's responsible for it.

    15. MT

      Well, uh, y- Saudi Arabia, that's another example where you can't really say it's, you know, one side or the oth- like, uh, both parties have been incredibly complicit in their cooperation with-

    16. JR

      Yeah.

    17. MT

      ... the Saudi regime and in, you know, the massacres that are going on in Yemen. Um, it's a classic example of what Noam Chomsky used to talk about with worthy and unworthy victims, right?

    18. JR

      Mm-hmm.

    19. MT

      Like if the c- if the Soviet Communists did it, they were ... that was bad. But if death squads in El Salvador killed a priest or a Catholic priest, you know, then that, that was s- something we didn't write about, 'cause they were our client state. Yemen is a story we don't write about. Syria is a story we do write about, but they're really equivalent stories. And, um, you know, the ... But you're absolutely right. The Khashoggi thing, uh, I don't think either p- party and, or either side's media really wants to get into that all that deeply.

  7. 11:1513:06

    ‘Hate, Inc.’ and the new business model: monetizing anger in the internet era

    1. JR

      How much is media shifting now? Like, you've, you've obviously been a journalist for a long time. Like, how m- how much are things changing in the light of the internet?

    2. MT

      Well, a lot. And this is where I'm gonna have a new book out now that's really about this, right? The wh- why the, the business has changed.

    3. JR

      What's it called?

    4. MT

      Hate, Inc. Yeah. It's out, it's out now. And, uh, it's, it's really about how the press, the business model of the press has changed. I mean, you ... It's something that you talk about a lot. You ... I, I hear you on your show a- all the time talking about how, um, uh, news agencies are always trying to push narratives on people, trying to get people wound up and upset. Uh, and that is a conscious business strategy that we didn't have maybe 30 years ago. You know, you think about ...... Walter Cronkite, or what the news was like back in the day. You had the whole family sitting around the table and everybody watching sort of a unifying experience to watch the news.

    5. JR

      Mm-hmm.

    6. MT

      Now, you have news for the crazy right-wing uncle and then you have news for the-

    7. JR

      Yeah. (laughs)

    8. MT

      ... the kid in the Shea T-shirt-

    9. JR

      Yeah.

    10. MT

      ... and they're different channels and they're trying to wind these- these people up, uh, you know, to get them upset constantly and stay there. And a lot of that has to do with the internet because, um, before the internet, n- news companies had like, a basically free way up to ma- of making money. They dominated distribution. The newspaper was the only thing in town that had a... You know, you, if you wanted to get a want ad, it had to be through the local newspaper. Now, with the internet, the internet is the distribution system. Anybody has access to it, not just the local newspaper. And so, there, th- the easy money is gone and we have to chase clicks more than we ever had, uh, had to before. We have to chase eyeballs more than we had to. So we've had to build new money-making strategies and- and a lot of it has to do with just sort of monetizing anger and division and all these things. And we just didn't do that before, and it's, uh, had a profound difference on- on the- on- on the media.

  8. 13:0620:16

    Narrative-first journalism and the Russia-era pressure to conform

    1. JR

      As a writer, have you personally experienced this sort of, uh, the influence where people have tried to lean you in the direction of clickbait or perhaps maybe alter titles that make them a little bit disingenuous in order to get people excited about the story?

    2. MT

      I mean, you know, I- I ... My editors at Rolling Stone are- are- are pretty good and they- and they give me a lot of we- leeway to kind of explore whatever I want to explore. But I- I definitely feel a lot of pressure that I didn't feel before in the business because ... Especially in the Trump era and- and, you know, I've written a lot about the Russia story, right? But, you know, that's an example of one side's media does ... has one take on it and another side's media has another take on it. And if you are just a journalist and you- and you wanna just sort of pr- report the facts, you feel a lot of pressure to fit the facts into a narrative that your audience is gonna like.

    3. JR

      Mm-hmm.

    4. MT

      And I had a lot of problem with the Russia story 'cause I- I thought, you know, I don't like Donald Trump but, I'm like, "I- I don't- I don't think this guy is James Bond consorting with Russian spies. I think he's corrupt in other ways." And there was a lot of blowback on my side of the business, um, because, you know, people in sort of liberal, quote-unquote "liberal media" y- you just have a ... There's a lot of pressure to have everybody fit into a certain narrative, and I think that's-

    5. JR

      Mm-hmm.

    6. MT

      ... really unhealthy for the business.

    7. JR

      (smacks lips) Yeah, very unhealthy, right? It's in... 'Cause as soon as people can be manipulated to conforming to that narrative, then all sorts of stories can be shifted.

    8. MT

      Oh, yeah. Yeah, absolutely. And- and you ... The- the job used to be about challenging your audience every now and then, right? Like if you think a certain thing is true, well, it's our job to give you the bad news and say that you're wrong about that.

    9. JR

      Yeah.

    10. MT

      That used to be what the job was, to be-

    11. JR

      Right.

    12. MT

      ... a journalist. Now, it's the opposite. Now, we have an audience. We're gonna tell you exactly what you wanna hear and what you... And we're gonna reinforce what you think. And that's very unhealthy. I mean, a- a- a great example of this was in the summer of 2016, um, when I was covering the campaign. I started to hear, um, reporters talking about how they didn't wanna report poll numbers that showed the race was close. They thought that that was gonna hurt Hillary, right?

    13. JR

      Mm-hmm.

    14. MT

      Like w- so in other words, we had information that the race was close and we're not telling this to audiences because they wanted to hear that it was gonna be a blowout for Hillary, right?

    15. JR

      Mm-hmm.

    16. MT

      Um, and that didn't help Hillary, it didn't help the Democrats-

    17. JR

      No.

    18. MT

      ... to not warn people about this, right? Um, but it was just because if you turned on MSNBC or CNN and you heard that Trump was within five points or whatever it was, that was gonna be a bummer for that audience. So we stayed away from it. And, you know, s- this is the kind of thing that it's- it's not politically beneficial to anybody. It's just we're just trying to keep people glued to the set by telling them what they wanna hear, and that's not the news. That's not our- that's not our job, you know? Uh, and it- it- it drives me crazy.

    19. JR

      (smacks lips) Yeah, it should drive you crazy. That... What you said about journalism being e- used to be something that you're challenging your reader. You're- you're giving them this reality that may be uncomfortable-

    20. MT

      Mm-hmm.

    21. JR

      ... but it's- it's educational and expands their view of the world. This ... Where- where do they get that now?

    22. MT

      They don't. That's the whole problem. Like, you get- you can predict exactly what the- each news organization, what their take is gonna be on any issue by going... I'll- I'll... Just so you take an example, when, um, (smacks lips) when the business about the ISIS leader, Al-Baghdadi, being killed, um, hit the news. Instantaneously, you knew that The New York Times, CNN, The Washington Post, that they were gonna write a whole bunch of stories about how Trump was overplaying the significance of it, that he-

    23. JR

      (smacks lips)

    24. MT

      ... you know, um, that he was telling lies about it. They would- they made- they m- ... You knew they were gonna make the entire thing about Trump, uh, and then meanwhile Fox had a completely different spin on it about how her- heroic it was. But- but news audiences didn't have anywhere to go to- to just simply hear who was this person, why was he important, what were the-

    25. JR

      Right.

    26. MT

      ... what do the people in the region think, you know. What kind of ... What is this gonna mean going forward? Is it actually gonna have any impact, you know? Uh, uh, uh, is... Are we gonna have to continually, um... You know, is there gonna be a new person like this every- every time, right? Are we actually accomplishing anything? Like, you don't get that anywhere. All you get is Trump is a shithead on one side and- and Trump is a hero on the other side.

    27. JR

      Yeah.

    28. MT

      That's- that's not the news, you know?

    29. JR

      No.

    30. MT

      Yeah.

  9. 20:1626:32

    Algorithms, outrage loops, and the ‘information diet’ problem

    1. JR

      Well, what's really interesting with this, a lot of this is this unpredicted consequence of having these open platforms like Facebook, and, uh, like, where, where people are getting their news, and then the algorithm sort of d- d- directs them towards things that are gonna piss them off. Which, y- I don't even think necessarily was initially the plan. I think the plan is to accelerate engagement, right?

    2. MT

      Mm-hmm.

    3. JR

      So they find out what y- what w- what you're engaging with, what stories you're engaging with, and then they b- give you more of that. Like Ari, my friend Ari Shaffir, actually p- tried this out. And what he did was, he went on YouTube and only looked up puppy videos.

    4. MT

      (laughs)

    5. JR

      And that's all he looked at for, like, weeks.

    6. MT

      Uh-huh.

    7. JR

      And then YouTube only started recommending puppy videos to him. So it's not necessarily that Facebook wants you to be outraged, but that when you are outraged, whether it's over abortion or war, whatever the subject is, you're gonna engage more, and their algorithm favors you engaging more.

    8. MT

      Mm-hmm.

    9. JR

      So if you're engaging more about something very positive, you know, if you're all about yoga and meditation, your algorithm would probably favor yoga and meditation 'cause those are the things that you engage with. But it's natural for people to be pissed off-

    10. MT

      Sure.

    11. JR

      ... and to look for things that are annoying, especially if you're done working, and you're like, "God, this world sucks. What's going on that sucks worse?" And then you go to your Facebook and, "Oh, Jesus, look at this goddamn border crisis."

    12. MT

      Right.

    13. JR

      "Oh, Jesus, look at this. Well, fuckin', here's the problem with these goddamn liberal, they don't know sh-" And then you, you engage, and then that's your life. And then it's, it's saying, "Oh, I know how to get Matt Hall fired up. I'm gonna fucking send him some abortion stories. Woo!"

    14. MT

      Right.

    15. JR

      And then that's your feed.

    16. MT

      Right, yeah, exactly. But the, but there's so many economic incentives that go in there, right?

    17. JR

      Yeah.

    18. MT

      They know that the, the more that you engage, the longer that you're on-

    19. JR

      Right.

    20. MT

      ... the more ads-

    21. JR

      Yes.

    22. MT

      ... that you c- you're gonna see.

    23. JR

      Yes.

    24. MT

      Right? So that same dynamic that Facebook and, and the social media companies figured out-

    25. JR

      Yeah.

    26. MT

      ... which is that if you keep feeding something, somebody something that, uh, you know, has been proven to spin that person up and get them wound up, that they're gonna, they're gonna come back for more of it, and they're gonna keep coming back. And actually, you can expand their desire to s- to see that stuff by-

    27. JR

      Mm-hmm.

    28. MT

      ... by making them sort of more angry overall. And they will, they will come back and they will spend more and more and more time. Well, the news companies figured out the same thing, and that they, they're just, they're just funneling stuff at you that they know you're gonna, they're, you're, you're gonna just be in an endless cycle of sort of impotent mute rage all the time.

    29. JR

      Mm-hmm.

    30. MT

      But it's kind of addicting, you know?

  10. 26:3241:22

    Censorship creep: platform rules, self-censorship, and the power of deplatforming

    1. MT

      Yeah, and when, uh, uh, uh, you know, the, the whole issue of, of a couple of companies like Facebook having control over what you do and do not see-

    2. JR

      Yes.

    3. MT

      ... is an, is an enormous problem-

    4. JR

      Yes.

    5. MT

      ... that nobody, nobody really cares about. I've tried to write about it a few times, I've written a couple of features about it and about how, what a serious problem this is. Like if you look in other countries like, um, Israel, uh, China, there, there are a number of companies where you see this, this pattern of internet platforms liaising with the government to decide what people can and cannot see. And they'll, they'll say, "Well, we don't wanna see, you know, the Palestinian protest movements," or, "We don't wanna see," um, you know, the, the Venezuelan channel, TeleSUR, like, "We wanna take that off." You think about how that could end up happening in the United States and it is already a little bit happening.

    6. JR

      It's a little bit, but it seems to be happening only in the terms of like t- leaning towards the progressive side, which people are okay with.

    7. MT

      Mm-hmm.

    8. JR

      'Cause they think, e- especially in the light of Donald Trump being in office, this is acceptable censorship.

    9. MT

      Yeah, but they're, I, you know, I think they're wrong about that.

    10. JR

      I think they're wrong about that, too.

    11. MT

      Yeah, and, and, and-

    12. JR

      Yeah, it's, it's terribly dangerous.

    13. MT

      It's very shortsighted.

    14. JR

      Yes.

    15. MT

      And, and they, and, and I think there's, there's also this thing that happens with, um, people where they think, "Oh, this is never gonna happen to me." You know? Like, uh, y- you can do that bad thing to this person that I don't like, but, you know-

    16. JR

      Right.

    17. MT

      ... as long as it's never gonna happen to me.

    18. JR

      Exactly.

    19. MT

      But they're wrong. I mean, history shows it always does happen to you. You know? And that's-

    20. JR

      Right.

    21. MT

      So we're, we're giving these companies an enormous amount of power to decide all kinds of things. What we, what we look at, um, what, what kind of political ideas we can be exposed to, um, you know? It, it, I think it's very, very dangerous.

    22. JR

      That biased interpretation of what something is, that was what people talked about when the initial Patriot Act was enacted. When people were like, "Hey, this might be fine with Obama in office." Right? If, maybe Obama is not going to i- enact some of the worst clauses of this and use it on people. Or the, um, was it NDAA? Is that what it was?

    23. MT

      Right, yeah.

    24. JR

      Yeah, where this, some of the things were just completely unconstitutional, they're like, "Don't worry, we're not gonna use those." But you're setting these tools aside for whatever fucking president we have. Like what if we have a guy who out-Trumps Trump?

    25. MT

      Right.

    26. JR

      I mean, we never thought we'd have a Trump, right? What if we have a next level guy post-Trump? What if there's some sort of d- catastrophe, tragedy, attack, something that really gets people fired up and they vote in someone who takes it up to another level?

    27. MT

      Mm-hmm.

    28. JR

      And then he has these tools and then he uses these tools on his political enemies, which is entirely possible.

    29. MT

      Well, I mean, we've already seen that a little bit.

    30. JR

      Yeah.

  11. 41:221:08:55

    ‘Don’t give them a platform’: debating deplatforming, ideas, and backlash dynamics

    1. JR

      Well, you're not supposed to talk to someone... I, I experience this all the time, the, this idea of giving someone a platform.

    2. MT

      Mm-hmm.

    3. JR

      Like y- like if I have someone on, like a Ben Shapiro or someone like that, you shouldn't give that guy a platform. Well, he's already got a platform. Shou- wouldn't it be better if I just talked to him and find out what his ideas are and, and, and ask him about those ideas? Like, we had a very bizarre conversation about gay people, where e- I mean, he's basically full on biblical religious t- interpretation of gay people, which to me is always strange. Like, okay, how do you stand on shellfish, you know? Do... Are y-

    4. MT

      (laughs)

    5. JR

      ... you just as strong on shrimp-

    6. MT

      Right, yeah.

    7. JR

      ... as you are on gay guys?

    8. MT

      Right, pork, yeah.

    9. JR

      Like wh- why is it gay guys? It's that... Like, the Bible's pretty clear on a bunch of different things that don't seem to fire people up the way homosexuality does. Like, why?

    10. MT

      Mm-hmm.

    11. JR

      Why do you care? If you had a friend that was eating shrimp, would you go to his house if he had shrimp cocktail? No. But you wouldn't go to a friend's house if he was having a gay marriage.

    12. MT

      Mm-hmm.

    13. JR

      So you won't celebrate gay marriage, but you don't mind a guy who's got a, a fucking, a shellfish platter-

    14. MT

      Right.

    15. JR

      ... out at a party. Like, that's in the Bible, man.

    16. MT

      Right.

    17. JR

      You're not supposed to wear two different kinds of cloth. You're... Y- you know? There's a, there's a bunch, there's a bunch of shit in the Bible that you, you're like, "Well, God was wrong about that." Like, how confident are you?

    18. MT

      Right.

    19. JR

      How confident are you that you can interpret God's word so perfectly that you're like, you let the lobster slide-

    20. MT

      (laughs)

    21. JR

      ... but all, all that butt fucking, we gotta stop that.

    22. MT

      (laughs)

    23. JR

      You know? Like, it's really weird.

    24. MT

      But that's the whole point is you, you, you challenge the idea, right?

    25. JR

      Yes, yes.

    26. MT

      But, but the prevailing view now is that even having the discussion-

    27. JR

      Yes.

    28. MT

      Because you have a platform, I mean, I read that thing in the Atlan- the Atlantic, you know? Where they were like, you, you, you give people too ... Uh, I forget what the phrase was. They were saying something like, um, "You had-"

    29. JR

      I give t- people too many chances.

    30. MT

      Too many chances, people who had already forfeited their right to have them, or someth- something along those lines, right?

  12. 1:08:551:18:30

    Comedy under surveillance: why ‘dangerous’ comedy returns (and why it’s fragile)

    1. MT

      Also, and, uh, and, and y- y- this must be a, a personal thing for you, but is this... isn't this the unfunniest time in American history? Like, humor has ne-

    2. JR

      Yes and no.

    3. MT

      Yeah?

    4. JR

      Because you're rewarded for, for stepping outside of the box-

    5. MT

      That's true.

    6. JR

      ... in a big way.

    7. MT

      That's true. Mm-hmm.

    8. JR

      Like, yeah, you mean Dave Chappelle gets attacked, but guess what? He also gets rewarded in a huge way.

    9. MT

      Right.

    10. JR

      When he goes on stage now, people go ape shit.

    11. MT

      That's true.

    12. JR

      And part of the reason why they go fucking bonkers is because they know that this guy doesn't give a fuck. And he's one of the rare ones who doesn't give a fuck, so when he goes up there, you know if he thinks something crazy about whatever it is, w- whatever protected group or whatever idea that he's not supposed to explore, that's not gonna stop him at all. He's gonna tell you exactly what he thinks about those things regardless of all this woke blowback. He's not... he doesn't care.

Episode duration: 2:05:29

Install uListen for AI-powered chat & search across the full episode — Get Full Transcript

Transcript of episode 2GJaLAIM1Ho

Get more out of YouTube videos.

High quality summaries for YouTube videos. Accurate transcripts to search & find moments. Powered by ChatGPT & Claude AI.