Skip to content
The Joe Rogan ExperienceThe Joe Rogan Experience

Joe Rogan Experience #1888 - Michael Shermer

Dr. Michael Shermer is the founding publisher of Skeptic magazine, host of the podcast "The Michael Shermer Show," and a Presidential Fellow at Chapman University. He is the author of several books, the most recent of which is "Conspiracy: Why the Rational Believe the Irrational." https://michaelshermer.com/

Joe RoganhostMichael Shermerguest
Jun 27, 20242h 49mWatch on YouTube ↗

EVERY SPOKEN WORD

  1. 0:000:51

    Shermer’s core thesis: why conspiratorial thinking can be rational

    1. JR

      (drumming music plays) Joe Rogan podcast, check it out.

    2. MS

      The Joe Rogan Experience.

    3. JR

      Train by day, Joe Rogan podcast by night. All day. (rock music plays)

    4. MS

      (laughs)

    5. JR

      ... Spears. Michael Shure.

    6. MS

      Icon-bearing signed gifts for you, sir.

    7. JR

      Thank you very much.

    8. MS

      (laughs) I hope that's all right.

    9. JR

      Why the Rational Believe the Irrational.

    10. MS

      Right.

    11. JR

      Why is that?

    12. MS

      (laughs)

    13. JR

      Is it simple? It wouldn't be this big of a book-

    14. MS

      N- no.

    15. JR

      ... if it was simple.

    16. MS

      Yeah, it's not that simple, but, uh ... Well, first of all, my argument is that it's not irrational to believe conspiracy theories, because enough of them are true that i- it pays to err on the side of assuming more of them are true than actually are than missing real conspiracy theories, and then that's a, a costlier err- error to make.

    17. JR

      That's a rational perspective.

    18. MS

      Yeah.

  2. 0:514:21

    JFK: Oswald-alone vs “something bigger” (and why the documents matter)

    1. JR

      Uh, the, the term conspiracy theory got thrown about ... There was the first, the first introduction of it into the zeitgeist was during the Kennedy assassination, correct?

    2. MS

      Yeah. Well, uh, around that time, right? It, it, uh ... Before that, before World War II really, conspiracy theories were kind of common knowledge. Everybody knew that things were going on behind, uh, closed doors and it was just ki- commonly known and we just kind of tried to figure it out. It didn't become really fringey until right after the JFK thing that it, it, it kinda got a, as a meme that you're crazy to think these conspiracy theories are true. It became pathologized.

    3. JR

      Yeah.

    4. MS

      You know, Richard Hofstadter's, you know, the Paranoid Style in American Politics kind of m- put that on the map as conspiracy theories are something delusional. You ... It's a, it's a pathology in your brain. Whereas, before that, it wasn't. It was just ... I mean, even the Declaration of Independence, it's a conspiracy theory. It's saying, "Look, the British are doing this whole train of abuses and usurpations, and here's what we think they're up to, and here's what we think they wanna do, and we're against that." That's printed right there in the Declaration.

    5. JR

      Yeah.

    6. MS

      So it's not fringey, right? It was, it was kind of commonly known that these things happened.

    7. JR

      The term as a pejorative, though, was ... It was introduced into, like, sort of the American m- m- culture around the Kennedy assassination.

    8. MS

      Yeah. Yeah, that's an interesting story, because, um, I'm, I'm convinced Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. I'm not a-

    9. JR

      Really?

    10. MS

      Yes, I am. Yeah.

    11. JR

      What makes you convinced of that?

    12. MS

      (laughs) Uh, well, I have a whole chapter on it, and we can get into that in a second. But, uh, the, the, the twist about it where it seems like there was something up was that John ... President Johnson was worried that if it looks like there's a conspiracy afoot with the Cubans or the Russians, that that could lead to a nuclear exchange, so we don't want the American people to think that this is some kind of vast conspiracy of the, of the Russians so we can avoid war.

    13. JR

      Have you gone back and forth on that at all?

    14. MS

      Uh-

    15. JR

      Or is it just something you've always believed?

    16. MS

      No, no. I ... Well, uh, before the Oliver Stone film, I hadn't really given it that much thought. I thought, "Well, the, you know, Warren Report seems pretty, uh, thorough, but, you know, who knows? What do I know?" And then, you know, the Oliver Stone film, which floats every conspiracy theory there was in one package, and then I thought, "Well, you know, if 10% of this is true, seems like there was something else going on." Uh, but then, you know, there were web pages posted of like, "Here are all the mistakes in the film, and here are all the counterarguments." And then I read Gerald Posner's book, Case Closed, about the life of Lee Harvey Oswald and why all the evidence points to him, and then, uh, Vincent Bugliosi's book, uh, Reclaiming History, which is, like, 1,500 pages long, and it, it dissects every one of the hundreds of conspiracy theories. There are ... Something on the order of 140 people have been accused, and, you know, a couple hundred organizations have been a- affiliated with the JFK assassination. The problem is, is that there's no convergence of evidence to any other one than Lee Harvey Oswald acting alone, and all the evidence points to him. So it's not impossible, you know that-

    17. JR

      All the evidence points to him?

    18. MS

      Massive amounts of evidence, right?

    19. JR

      Mm-hmm.

    20. MS

      And so now, we're supposed to get a new, uh, uh, uh-

    21. JR

      Why do you think they-

    22. MS

      ... troch- tranches of documents.

    23. JR

      But they're not. They're, they won't release 'em. They keep stopping-

    24. MS

      Yeah.

    25. JR

      ... the release of these documents.

    26. MS

      Uh, this worries me because that makes people suspicious, as it should. And, uh, so any, any ... But, but back, back to-

    27. JR

      But wait a minute. It worries you because it makes people suspicious, or it worries you-

    28. MS

      Yes. Yes.

    29. JR

      ... because it points to their withholding information because that information looks bad?

    30. MS

      Uh, I would love to see the information, and I would change my mind in a heartbeat. Uh-

  3. 4:219:18

    The ‘magic bullet’ and eyewitness reliability in high-chaos events

    1. JR

      What are your, what are your thoughts on the magic bullet?

    2. MS

      Okay. The magic bullet is not a magic bullet. It's a single-bullet theory. That is ... What, what it's usually rendered as is Kennedy and Connally are sitting like this, si- uh, you know, back-

    3. JR

      Oh, I'm aware of all of it.

    4. MS

      Back to back. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

    5. JR

      Yeah.

    6. MS

      Right. So the bullet doesn't have to go left, right, and, and so forth.

    7. JR

      Kennedy was elevated.

    8. MS

      Yes. Right.

    9. JR

      Yeah.

    10. MS

      So if you draw a line straight back to the sixth-floor window of the Book Depository building, the bullet goes straight through his back, out his neck, into Connally, through his arm, into his leg, and so forth, uh, in a straight line.

    11. JR

      Well, you know the only reason why they had to come up with the theory that that one bullet did all that damage. You know that, right?

    12. MS

      Well, you know-

    13. JR

      You know why?

    14. MS

      Well, th- th- I don't know. Go, go ahead and give me your-

    15. JR

      'Cause someone was hit by a ricochet-

    16. MS

      Oh, yeah. I'm da- I'm da-

    17. JR

      ... in the underpass.

    18. MS

      I'm da-

    19. JR

      And so they had to attribute all that damage to one bullet.

    20. MS

      That's right. Right. That's right. Yeah. S-

    21. JR

      But there's more ... In Connally's body, there was more pieces of bullet that were missing-

    22. MS

      Mm-hmm.

    23. JR

      ... from the actual bullet itself.

    24. MS

      Mm-hmm.

    25. JR

      Did you ever look at the actual bullet itself? Have you studied it?

    26. MS

      Yeah. I have a picture of it in there.

    27. JR

      Yeah.

    28. MS

      You know, it, it-

    29. JR

      I know a lot about bullets.

    30. MS

      Yeah. It is-

  4. 9:1811:05

    Proportionality bias and ‘constructive conspiracism’ (signal detection model)

    1. MS

      Okay, so here's one argument I'm making. It's, it's the argument from proportionality, that the, the ef- the, the effect should have a matching size cause, so let me just back up here for a second. If you take a little pebble and throw it, it doesn't take a lot of effort to do it. A, a fist-sized stone, takes more effort. A big boulder, massive effort. So our, our folk physics, we feel like cause and effect should match, right? So, interesting experiment. If you take subjects and give them two dice and say, "Okay, now try to roll a low number," they'll, they'll kind of just gently toss it like that. Now, try to roll a high number, like an 11 or 12. They'll give it a good heave like that.

    2. JR

      Well, that's dumb people.

    3. MS

      Well... (laughs) But that's our intuition. So it feels like-

    4. JR

      But that's people that don't know about dice.

    5. MS

      Okay.

    6. JR

      We're talk- talking about trained assassins.

    7. MS

      Okay, but let me, let me finish. So, you know, our sense is that big events, JFK assassination, Princess Di, uh, dies, 9/11, COVID-19, uh, uh, counterfactually, if Oswald had missed Kennedy or just wounded him and he didn't die, would there be massive conspiracy theories about who he was? Okay, so this has actually happened.

    8. JR

      Well, the-

    9. MS

      Now, John Hinckley-

    10. JR

      But hold on a minute.

    11. MS

      John-

    12. JR

      That's, that's a straw man-

    13. MS

      Wait, lemme finish.

    14. JR

      ... because you're saying that Oswald did act alone, if he had missed.

    15. MS

      Yeah, if he had missed.

    16. JR

      But he w- but it, but-

    17. MS

      Nobody would make a big deal about it.

    18. JR

      ... we're talking about after the murder.

    19. MS

      Right. That's my point.

    20. JR

      The reason why there's a conspiracy is 'cause he was murdered.

    21. MS

      Right. So why are there no conspiracy theories about John Hinckley shooting Reagan?

    22. JR

      Because John Hinckley has a real trail of mental illness.

    23. MS

      Well-

    24. JR

      He wrote letters to Jodie Foster.

    25. MS

      Right, right.

    26. JR

      He was a very specific human being who was obsessed with killing Reagan to impress Jodie Foster.

    27. MS

      Right.

    28. JR

      It's all really documented.

    29. MS

      Right.

    30. JR

      He's out now, too.

  5. 11:0523:17

    Real conspiracies as fuel: MKUltra, Northwoods, COINTELPRO, and state secrecy

    1. JR

      ... there's this, there's a big conspiracy about that, about the Manson family and the, uh, the fact that Charles Manson was a part of MKUltra.

    2. MS

      Oh, yes, right. Yes, right, right. So we can go-

    3. JR

      Did you ever read Chaos by Tom O'Neill?

    4. MS

      No, I haven't read that one.

    5. JR

      It's a fantastic book. It's all about why Manson kept getting released.

    6. MS

      Mm-hmm.

    7. JR

      You know, M- Manson was in jail, right? And during the time he was in jail, he was visited by Jolly West, who was the head of the CIA's MKUltra LSD experiments. They most certainly did something to Manson while he was in jail, and they also supplied him... there's anecdotal evidence that shows that they supplied him with LSD when he got out of jail.

    8. MS

      Mm-hmm.

    9. JR

      Every time he got arrested for violating parole, these cops and these local sheriffs that had caught him were told that it was above their pay grade and they had to release him.

    10. MS

      Mm-hmm.

    11. JR

      ... Manson got out-

    12. MS

      Mm-hmm.

    13. JR

      ... for multiple offenses after he was on parole, things that should have kept him locked up.

    14. MS

      Mm-hmm.

    15. JR

      There's some real good evidence that, you know about M- MKUltra was a rare thing.

    16. MS

      Yep. Yep.

    17. JR

      And that's, that's an interesting conspiracy, right?

    18. MS

      Yeah.

    19. JR

      'Cause it's a real one.

    20. MS

      It's a real one.

    21. JR

      Documented.

    22. MS

      Our own government was doing this.

    23. JR

      Yeah. Well, there's, there's Operation Midnight Climax that they were involved with, where they were ... Do you know about that one?

    24. MS

      Mm-hmm.

    25. JR

      That's where they were dosing up, um, johns when they would go to visit prostitutes-

    26. MS

      Mm-hmm.

    27. JR

      ... and they would film them through-

    28. MS

      Yes. (laughs)

    29. JR

      ... two-way mirrors.

    30. MS

      Right.

  6. 23:1724:30

    A ‘conspiracy detection kit’: scale, incentives, and the ‘too big to keep secret’ problem

    1. MS

      Yeah. But I mean, again, how does, how do these systems really work? Um, you know, the, so this is my kind of, uh, conspiracy detection kit. You know, the grander the conspiracy theory, the less likely it is to be true. Like, s- say Volkswagen cheating the emission standards in, uh-

    2. JR

      Mm-hmm.

    3. MS

      ... Europe. That, you know, that's a very specific conspiracy theory. Turned out to be true. They really did do that, and for obvious reasons, profit motive, right? But, but, but, so if you scale up from that, "Well, they're trying to control the entire European, uh, um, uh, economy," or something like, well, no, that's too big. That's-

    4. JR

      They're just trying to make money.

    5. MS

      They're just trying to make money, right? So, um, you know, the, the more people that have to be involved, the more elements that have to come-

    6. JR

      Right.

    7. MS

      People are incompetent, people can't keep their mouths shut.

    8. JR

      ... for the most part.

    9. MS

      For the most part, yes. Now-

    10. JR

      Yeah.

    11. MS

      ... to be fair to, to the other side, um, you know, if you read about the development of the U-2 spy plane and the AR-71 Blackbird, you know, this was done in Burbank-

    12. JR

      Mm-hmm.

    13. MS

      ... in where, near where you used to live.

    14. JR

      Yeah, sure.

    15. MS

      And that's right in the heart of LA.

    16. JR

      Yep.

    17. MS

      How did they do this for all those years and nobody knew about it, right?

    18. JR

      Well, they were acting on th- the interests of the, the government. They were trying to be patriots. They kept their mouths shut-

    19. MS

      Right.

    20. JR

      ... because they were trying to win a war against the, the evil others.

  7. 24:3036:41

    UAPs: secret drones, bad data, or something else?

    1. MS

      Right. So, um, again, like, with the recent UAP sightings, what I want ... my initial response is, the SR-71 Blackbird was, before it was declassified, there were commercial pilots going, "Oh my God, there's something-"

    2. JR

      Right.

    3. MS

      "... going 3,000 miles an hour, 50,000 feet above me at 30,000 feet. This is impossible. We don't have anything like that." Well, actually, we did have something like that.

    4. JR

      Yeah, so-

    5. MS

      So I suspect that the-

    6. JR

      That's what you think the UAPs are?

    7. MS

      ... some of these UAP, I think in, in a decade or two, we're gonna find out, oh, we had these incredible drones-

    8. JR

      Yeah.

    9. MS

      ... that could fly at these speeds and-

    10. JR

      I, I tend to lean towards that as well sometimes. I go back and forth with it. I had, uh, Ryan Graves on recently.

    11. MS

      Yeah, I saw that.

    12. JR

      It was a fascinating conversation because the way he was describing things, with no visible means of propulsion, um, no technology that we currently know is available could act in the way those things were acting. I wonder if that is what it is, if they have some sort of very advanced drones. And the fact that they seem to be trans-medium, they seem to be able to enter into the ocean and then leave the ocean, I wonder. I wonder if that's something that we have because these things, they're ... you know, one of the ones that he described is like a translucent circle with a black sphere inside of it.

    13. MS

      Yes, right.

    14. JR

      And that when they updated their radar systems in 2014, they started seeing them all over the place on their systems and that these people spotted them visually and that they were behaving in a way, like, uh, you know, 130 mile an hour winds were completely stationary. I wonder if those are super advanced drones.

    15. MS

      Yeah, a lot of pr- uh, another problem with these videos is that they're very grainy, uh, blurry, you can't quite make out what's going on, like the one that looks like it goes into the ocean and comes back out. It's not clear that it goes in the ocean 'cause it ... the, the, the horizon and the ocean is-

    16. JR

      Mm-hmm.

    17. MS

      ... is so blurry, right? So I'm a member of this, uh, Galileo Project at Harvard run by Avi Loeb, the head of the astronomy department there.

    18. JR

      I had Avi on.

    19. MS

      Yep. I know.

    20. JR

      Yeah.

    21. MS

      And, uh, you know, we're, we're g- he, he's raising money to put cameras, high resolution cameras all over the world.

    22. JR

      Right.

    23. MS

      Particularly in the places where people like Graves say they s- ... I mean, when Graves told you, "I ... we saw these things every day," it's like, "Every day?"

    24. JR

      Mm-hmm. Yeah.

    25. MS

      There, there surely must be high resolution photos of these things.

    26. JR

      But those things, those jets are not designed to take high resolution video. They're designed to fight against enemy jets.

    27. MS

      Right, right.

    28. JR

      That's what they're designed for. They're designed to recognize these enemy combatants and engage with them in the most effective way possible. That's not with high resolution digital video.

    29. MS

      Right. Well, that would be the, uh, that would be the solution. We just need better data. (laughs) Right?

    30. JR

      Well, I wonder if they want better data. Now, let's assume-

  8. 36:4146:20

    Science updating itself: James Webb, dark matter/energy as placeholders

    1. JR

      Have you seen some of the new, um-... discussions based on the, uh, observations from the James Webb, uh, Telescope that maybe the Big Bang Theory needs, needs to be revisited?

    2. MS

      Yes. Uh, vaguely. It was the expansion rate changing, right?

    3. JR

      Mm-hmm.

    4. MS

      The, uh, from the new, um ...

    5. JR

      Well, they're getting new data, right?

    6. MS

      Right.

    7. JR

      They're constantly getting new data and we, we would assume that with more and more sophisticated ways of viewing the known universe that we could possibly get some new data that would change our ideas of what the theory of the Big Bang Theory or the theory of the, the universe itself would be. And that's one of the things that they're discussing right now. What was that? There was a recent article. What was it in? Which, uh, scientific publication that they were discussing whether or not the Big Bang Theory needs to be revisited?

    8. MS

      I-

    9. JR

      Bas- it was based on the James Webb ...

    10. MS

      Yeah, I did see that.

    11. JR

      Yeah.

    12. MS

      I mean, it ... Joe, it would be astonishing if that didn't happen.

    13. JR

      Right. Right. Yeah.

    14. MS

      (laughs) Because, you know, no theory in science is permanent. They-

    15. JR

      Especially like, right-

    16. MS

      ... it's never fixed.

    17. JR

      It's not like right now we have all the information about... We have the entire universe mapped out, every planet, everything. We know exactly what it is, we know exactly how old everything is, and we know for sure. We just, we just have a limited ability to look, right?

    18. MS

      Yeah. It ... That's it. It's the limitations of our technology. So in the nine- late '90s is when they discovered the ex- the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate. Well, how can that be? You know, because in an explosion, you know, the initial explosion, the inflation in cosmology, is really rapid then it slows and slows and slows. And so it was supposed to slow down in, you know, another 10 billion years or something-

    19. JR

      Right.

    20. MS

      ... and maybe collapse back on itself and then they discover, oh my God, no. These Type II Supernova, whatever it was, uh, indicate that the expansion is accelerating so there's this weird force, dark energy, that pushes it away.

    21. JR

      (sniffs)

    22. MS

      And dark matter is this, you know, proffered thing that explains why galaxies are held together 'cause they don't have enough mass to hold them together in the structures that they are, as I understand it, and rotate at the way they're rotating, so there's something else we can't see.

    23. JR

      Right.

    24. MS

      So now, so when astronomers talk about dark energy and dark matter to explain these two anomalies, like how could this be, that's not an explanation. It's just, it's just a linguistic placeholder until we figure out what it is.

    25. JR

      Right. Right.

    26. MS

      So surely there is gonna be some discoveries of some kind of n- new energy or some kind of matter that i- w- we don't know of. A century from now it's like, "Oh, of course!" If you came back after being chronically frozen. "Oh, that's what it was. Oh." (laughs)

    27. JR

      So what would it take for you to look ... I mean, what kind of discovery would it take in terms of UAPs for you to revisit your position and say it's highly likely that this is either something that we don't understand that we, uh, are observing that's come from somewhere else or something that we don't understand because it's technology that hasn't been released?

    28. MS

      The actual specimen. (laughs) The, the actual e- e- the equivalent of the SR71 Blackbird. I can go to the museum, I can see it, touch it, walk on it. Everybody knows that.

    29. JR

      So do you hold it like ... Do you have like a placeholder, like, perhaps?

    30. MS

      Yeah. I do.

  9. 46:2058:34

    When science fails: replication crisis, fraud, incentives, and p-hacking

    1. MS

      So this is what, you know, s- uh, science has kind of developed, science and rationality over the centuries. Okay, so we know we're biased, we know we have to be careful about the confirmation bias and the hindsight bias and so on, so we have to set up some kind of system where it's not just me claiming it. You, you, you have, you can look at it too, you could run the experiment.

    2. JR

      Mm-hmm.

    3. MS

      Here's how I did it. You do it. Right? And when that's not done, we, we have all kinds of problems, like the replication crisis in psychology and, and medical science over the last decade or so. You know, the, some significant two-digit percentage of these experiments can't be replicated even though they went through peer-reviewed, um, professional journals and they were done by professional scientists at real universities and so on. And, uh, so this is a pro- it's a hard, it's hard to know what to believe, right?

    4. JR

      But there's also a problem of basing science on falsified studies, like the Alzheimer's issue that they're dealing with now.

    5. MS

      Mm-hmm.

    6. JR

      You know, the whole amyloid plaque thing, where they found out that a lot of... Like, what is the... I don't want to butcher this, 'cause obviously I'm not a scientist, but this, there's a series of Alzheimer's drugs that were based on research that was falsified.

    7. MS

      Mm-hmm.

    8. JR

      And they're finding this out now.

    9. MS

      Mm-hmm.

    10. JR

      And this is a, a terrible thing for people that have, you know, in- invested their health in these medications, people that have promoted these medications, that this was all based on falsified data.

    11. MS

      Or how about the, uh-

    12. JR

      Find that, 'cause tha- that's pretty fascinating, 'cause that, here it is. This is a legitimate conspiracy. "Neuroscience image sleuth finds signs of fabrication in scores of Alzheimer's articles threatening a reigning theory of the disease."

    13. MS

      Mm-hmm. Yeah.

    14. JR

      That's terrifying-

    15. MS

      Yeah, yeah.

    16. JR

      ... to find out that the people that are responsible for doing these experiments falsified. "Matthew Schrag, a neuroscientist and physician at Vanderbilt University, got a call that would plunge him into a maelstrom of possible scientific misconduct. A colleague wanted to connect him with an attorney investigating an experimental drug for Alzheimer's disease called simofyllam. The drug's developer, Cassava Sciences, claimed it improved cognition partially, partly by repairing a protein that can block sticky brain deposits of the protein amyloid-beta, a hallmark of Alzheimer's. The attorney's clients, two prominent neuroscientists who are also short sellers who profit if the company's stock falls, believe some research related to simofyllam may have been fraudulent according to a petition later filed on the behalf of the US Food and Drug Administration." So this is, um...... this is a, a huge scandal-

    17. MS

      Mm-hmm.

    18. JR

      ... in medical science.

    19. MS

      Right. And this one appears to be more fraud than just error-

    20. JR

      Right. Yeah.

    21. MS

      ... or bias.

    22. JR

      Right.

    23. MS

      So, well, okay-

    24. JR

      That's horrible, right?

    25. MS

      ... this is what, yeah, this is what whistleblowers are for. Often, these things are exposed through insiders. I mean, almost always. Rare that a journalist from the outside discovers it. It's usually a grad student or something that's suspicious of what the mentor professor is doing. Uh, so that, yeah, that's a problem, right? (laughs) So, that's why you have to disclose any, um, you know, financial c- uh, connections you have to companies that might be affiliated with a drug that could treat the thing you're studying, that sort of thing, you're, um... and so there's more pressure to do that. There was another big meta-analysis on SSRIs, the antidepressants-

    26. JR

      Mm-hmm, yes.

    27. MS

      ... uh, showing, you know, big, massive meta-analysis. You know, 50 years we've been at, um, prescribing these SSRIs for depression, and they do no better than nothing or just chance or just, you know, talking to friends or whatever. Uh-

    28. JR

      Well, also that this idea that it's a, a chemical imbalance of the brain is not based on science.

    29. MS

      Yeah, well, it's based on (laughs) something, but it, it, probably incorrect science or-

    30. JR

      Yeah.

  10. 58:341:08:43

    Moral panics and manufactured memories: satanic panic, McMartin, Loftus’s research

    1. MS

      ... then you get a moral panic. It's like the satanic panic of the, of the 1980s.

    2. JR

      Mm-hmm.

    3. MS

      Started with that McMartin Preschool, uh, case in Manhattan Beach.

    4. JR

      Yes, that's... We'll talk about that because that's pretty crazy.

    5. MS

      Totally crazy. So this was, um, k- kind of in the time in psychology where Freud- Freudianism, uh, sort of unconscious memories of things and, and, and so on were becoming popular. And there was this idea that, um, you know, there's a lot of molestation and it's... And, and secret satanic cults all over America and there's a lot of these kind of preschools. So the McMartin Preschool Case, um, was based on children telling these fantastic stories-

    6. JR

      Mm-hmm.

    7. MS

      ... about the stuff that was going on at the day school. Now you have kids, I have kids, it's like how this is impossible for parents not to know this. Oh, well, they're ta-... They have tunnels, underground tunnels where they have horses, they take them out to Catalina and they do these satanic things to them and what, the parents, did no one noticed this or...

    8. JR

      And they were kind of coaching the kids when they were asking the kids these questions-

    9. MS

      Right.

    10. JR

      ... like, what did they do? Did they do this? And the kids were like, "Yeah, yeah, yeah."

    11. MS

      Remember the anatomical dolls, anatomically correct dolls? Now-

    12. JR

      Show me where they touched you.

    13. MS

      ... show me where he touched you, right?

    14. JR

      Right, right.

    15. MS

      And worse, you know, they, they separate the kids from their parents, the-

    16. JR

      Right.

    17. MS

      ... mom, mom's outside and the little kid's scared to death in this room.

    18. JR

      Yeah.

    19. MS

      And then he's like, "Okay, he to- touched me there. Can I go back to my mommy now?" You know?

    20. JR

      Right.

    21. MS

      It's like...

    22. JR

      And then this ruined people's lives-

    23. MS

      Yeah, totally.

    24. JR

      ... and careers and these people were accused of these horrible things that turns out they did not do.

    25. MS

      They didn't do. Before the OJ trial, this was the longest, most expensive trial in California history, that McMartin Preschool Case, but it launched this kind of satanic panic around America. There's one of these cults in every city.

    26. JR

      Mm-hmm.

    27. MS

      And finally the FBI got involved and said, "All right, we better look into this." And they, you know, found nothing or... Okay, y- you can always find some weirdo who's a Satanist, right?

    28. JR

      Right.

    29. MS

      And maybe they do some weird things with a cat or something.

    30. JR

      Mm-hmm.

  11. 1:08:431:43:29

    Proxy conspiracies and institutional distrust: O.J., Tuskegee, Paperclip, MKUltra fallout

    1. MS

      Okay. So, this is my, this is my type specimen for p- uh, what I call proxy conspiracists. That is, conspiracies, that is they're, they're a stand-in for something else. The O.J., uh, case. O.J. was acquitted based on a conspiracy theory that the LAPD planted the bloody glove and the blood splatter and so forth, and the jury accepted it. Now, you know, the evidence is pretty overwhelming. He, he killed his wife and her friend, and there was no, uh, police tampering. There was the one guy, Fuhrman, who was probably a racist, but it wasn't clear that he did anything. But my explanation is that in a way the jury, you know, uh, said, "Yeah, maybe not this time, but the LAPD have done these sorts of things."

    2. JR

      Right.

    3. MS

      And there's this great ESPN documentary series called O.J. in America, and it's like six hours long, and it, it tracks the history of the African American community post-World War II coming to Southern California and how bad the relationships were between the LAPD and the African American community, particularly right in downtown LA. And they did plant evidence. They did do things like that.

    4. JR

      Yes.

    5. MS

      Right? So, there's an element of truth, back to conspiracism. It, it, you should be-

Episode duration: 2:49:12

Install uListen for AI-powered chat & search across the full episode — Get Full Transcript

Transcript of episode HDgQBk1wl3M

Get more out of YouTube videos.

High quality summaries for YouTube videos. Accurate transcripts to search & find moments. Powered by ChatGPT & Claude AI.