Skip to content

By playing, you agree to uListen's Terms and Privacy Policy and YouTube's Terms of Service.

Kimi AIKimi AI

How We Scaled Kimi K2.5 | Zhilin Yang's full GTC 2026 Keynote

If you're curious about the "how" behind scaling Kimi's latest models, this is the session you can't miss:)

Mar 20, 202639mWatch on YouTube

Summaries, chapters, transcripts, and FAQs on this page are made by uListen, not YouTube.

At a glance

WHAT IT’S REALLY ABOUT

Scaling open models via token efficiency, long context, and agent swarms

  1. The keynote frames progress in open models as scaling along three axes: token efficiency, context length, and multi-agent (swarm) execution.
  2. For token efficiency, the speaker describes scaling the Muon optimizer for large LLM training and solving 1T-parameter instability via a per-head query/key clipping method called QK clip.
  3. For long context, the speaker introduces Kimi Linear with Kimi Delta Attention and a mixed linear/full attention stack to improve efficiency and performance across short- and long-context tasks.
  4. For complex task capacity, the speaker proposes an orchestrated agent-swarm training paradigm with new reward terms to encourage parallelization and completion of subtasks.
  5. The talk culminates in Kimi K2.5, described as a stably trained open model with early-fused joint vision-text training, followed by a preview of a next-generation “Attention Residue” architecture that applies attention across depth (layers).

IDEAS WORTH REMEMBERING

5 ideas

Open models matter most when they’re both accessible and frontier-grade.

The speaker argues that open models let people deploy anywhere (local servers or cloud) and inspect full model weights rather than relying on a black box, but emphasizes they must also be highly competitive to matter.

Token efficiency is treated as a path to higher capability, not just lower cost.

They frame progress as scaling not only the number of training tokens, but also shifting the scaling curve via better architectures/optimizers so the same amount of data yields lower loss.

A second-order optimizer (Muon) is presented as a major lever for scaling open LLMs.

They describe investing in the Muon optimizer, claiming about a 2× token-efficiency improvement over AdamW when implemented with key techniques like weight decay, RMS-consistent updates, and a distributed state-partitioned implementation.

Training stability at trillion-parameter scale required a targeted attention-logit control mechanism.

When scaling Muon to a 1T-parameter model, they report logit explosion and divergence, and introduce “QK clip,” which clips query/key projections per attention head to constrain max logits while keeping the loss curve essentially unchanged.

Long-context capability is positioned as essential for long-running agents and complex tasks.

They motivate long-context scaling by contrasting transformers vs LSTMs, highlighting that transformer loss keeps improving across the context while LSTMs saturate, and propose Kimi Linear with Kimi Delta Attention plus a 1:3 mix of linear and full attention layers.

WORDS WORTH SAVING

5 quotes

So one thing that I would like to emphasize is that token e- eff- efficiency is not just about efficiency. It's actually also about improving the upper bound of intelligence.

— Unattributed

It's not just about infrastructure efficiency, it's about, you know, better, uh, intelligence.

— Unattributed

And the solution to this is to introduce this new technique called, uh, QK clip.

— Unattributed

And this is, uh, the first example of a large-scale Muon training in the history of machine learning.

— Unattributed

So this is also one of the, uh, most beautiful curves that, uh, I observe in my life.

— Unattributed

Read the available transcript
Democratizing intelligence with open weightsScaling laws and token efficiencyMuon optimizer and distributed implementationTraining instability and QK clipLong-context scaling and transformers vs LSTMsKimi Linear and Kimi Delta AttentionLinear/full attention mixing ratio (1:3) and efficiency trade-offs","Agent swarms, orchestrator design, and parallel execution","Agent-swarm reward design: instantiation, finish, outcome","Kimi K2.5 stable pretraining and early fusion vision-text","Zero-vision SFT with joint RL","Attention Residue (depth-wise attention) and block variant

High quality AI-generated summary created from speaker-labeled transcript.

Get more out of YouTube videos.

Read along on your phone, search it beside the video, or ask your favorite AI app what was said.