Skip to content
Modern WisdomModern Wisdom

Why Men & Women Are Giving Up On Each Other - Daniel Cox

Daniel Cox is a researcher, pollster and Director of the Survey Center on American Life. Expect to learn why men and women understand each other less than they used to, why young women feel less safe despite so much progress, what parents should do differently if they want their children to eventually have successful relationships, what young men incorrectly believe about women because of the internet, why political compatibility became romantic compatibility and much more… -- Get 35% off your first subscription on the best supplements from Momentous at https://livemomentous.com/modernwisdom Get a Free Sample Pack of LMNT’s most popular flavours with your first purchase at https://drinklmnt.com/modernwisdom Get up to 20% off Timeline’s leading longevity and cellular health supplement at https://timeline.com/modernwisdom Get 160+ lab tests for just $365 and save an extra $25 at https://functionhealth.com/modernwisdom Get ChatGPT to explore ideas, solve problems, and learn faster at ⁠https://chatgpt.com - 0:00 Do Men and Women Understand Each Other? 5:53 What the Man vs Bear Debate Really Revealed 8:48 Why Do Women Feel So Unsafe? 14:23 Does the Internet Bring Out the Worst in Us? 17:45 What Men Get Wrong About Women 27:07 How Financial Independence Changed Relationships 30:38 Are Smaller Families Making Us Less Community-Minded? 42:07 Is AI Making Us More Antisocial? 46:35 Why Are More People Staying Single? 56:30 Why Men and Women See Cheating Differently 01:05:03 Is Modern Education Failing Boys? 01:12:26 What Are Young Men Supposed to Aspire To? 01:15:54 Is Monk Mode Helping or Hurting Men? 01:22:12 How Loneliness Differs Between Men and Women 01:26:34 Are Women Better at Emotional Support? 01:32:35 How Politics Is Driving Men and Women Apart 01:46:37 Can We Reverse the Rise of Uncoupling? 01:53:51 Where to Find Daniel - Get access to every episode 10 hours before YouTube by subscribing for free on Spotify - https://spotify.modernwisdom.com or Apple Podcasts - https://apple.modernwisdom.com Get my free Reading List of 100 life-changing books here - https://chriswillx.com/books/ Try my productivity energy drink Neutonic here - https://neutonic.com/modernwisdom - Get in touch in the comments below or head to... Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/chriswillx Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/chriswillx Email: https://chriswillx.com/contact/

Chris WilliamsonhostDaniel Coxguest
Oct 22, 20261h 54mWatch on YouTube ↗

At a glance

WHAT IT’S REALLY ABOUT

How social media, lost community, and shifting norms fuel gender distrust

  1. Daniel Cox argues that modern gender hostility is rooted in formative experiences—online upbringing, smaller families, and reduced real-world mixed-gender socialization—rather than any single recent cultural event.
  2. Social media algorithms segregate men and women into different content streams that magnify tail risks, reinforce stereotypes, and make productive conversation on sensitive topics nearly impossible.
  3. Women’s rising sense of unsafety is linked to institutional distrust and pervasive online harassment from strangers, shifting safety from collective enforcement to individual boundary management.
  4. Dating apps intensify disembodied, performance-based mate selection and reduce generosity (e.g., fewer second chances), contributing to widespread exhaustion, disappointment, and “uncoupling.”
  5. The decline of third spaces, civic institutions, and in-person work/community life—along with app/AI replacements for everyday reliance on others—deepens loneliness and polarizes political and gender identities, especially among Gen Z.

IDEAS WORTH REMEMBERING

5 ideas

The “gender hostility” problem starts upstream in childhood socialization, not just in adult dating culture.

Cox argues the roots are formative: kids grew up online, had fewer in-person mixed-gender settings (church, clubs, casual social scenes), and received intensive “you’re special” parenting that reduced practice with compromise. These early conditions make later dating and cross-sex empathy harder, independent of MeToo, apps, or the manosphere.

Algorithms don’t just show extremes; they create gendered echo chambers that harden stereotypes.

Social platforms separate users early by gender and then feed each group content that validates its fears and grievances—often showcasing only “perfect” relationships or disasters. Comments and mass affirmation (the pile-on of “yep”) matter as much as the original provocative post, because they suggest a whole community endorses hostility.

Feeling unsafe is amplified by institutional distrust and always-on digital harassment, not simply by offline crime trends.

Women’s rising safety concerns are framed as a shift from collective/institutional responsibility to individual burden: declining trust in police, schools, churches, and other norm-enforcing bodies. Online harassment from strangers (including sex-based threats and pressure for nudes) makes risk feel constant and “follow you home.”

Online dating narrows evaluation to shallow cues and reduces patience, which accelerates burnout and cynicism.

Dating has become “disembodied” and performative: people judge from photos and curated signals (money, taste, lifestyle) rather than seeing character under stress or in community contexts. Cox notes people are far less willing to give second chances to app dates versus introductions through mutual friends, because social circles provide ballast, accountability, and context.

Norm confusion plus public reputational risk makes initiation feel dangerous, especially for socially under-practiced men.

With fewer shared scripts (who asks, who pays, what’s ‘appropriate’), young men face more initiation pressure plus higher reputational risk (being filmed, misinterpreted, or publicly shamed). Cox suggests many men also misunderstand women’s preferences: even many self-identified feminist women still want visible care behaviors (checking in, kindness, sometimes paying/initiating).

WORDS WORTH SAVING

5 quotes

I think a lot of young people grew up, uh, understanding that the purpose of family is not the betterment of all members, but, like, for their personal, uh, interests and, uh, achievement.

— Daniel Cox

So your average relationship with all the problems, with all the, the sort of difficulties and uncertainty is just not portrayed. You have just the, the perfect relationship or the disasters, like that's what you get online.

— Daniel Cox

I think it, it- It shows that the, that social media in general is an incredibly ill-suited platform to have really difficult discussions on sensitive topics.

— Daniel Cox

I think we've raised this generation, and I, I sort of put myself in this back, uh, bucket a little bit, that to, to need someone is, is a sign of weakness, right?

— Daniel Cox

Like, it's not gonna be AI that allows you to, you know, maximize your potential. It's going to be the sort of consistent, uh, engagement you have with the people in your life, the people that are important to you, that you'll give up smoking, you'll give up other bad habits.

— Daniel Cox

Formative experiences and online upbringingAlgorithmic gender sorting and stereotypesMan vs Bear discourse and online conflictSafety perceptions, harassment, and institutional trustDating apps, performative selection, and second chancesSmaller families, accommodation culture, and negotiation skillsDecline of third spaces, civic institutions, and in-person work

High quality AI-generated summary created from speaker-labeled transcript.

Get more out of YouTube videos.

Read along on your phone, search it beside the video, or ask your favorite AI app what was said.

iOSAndroidClaudeChromeChatGPTComing soon