Skip to content
No PriorsNo Priors

No Priors Ep. 137 | With Warp Co-Founder & CEO Zach Lloyd

For decades, the developer terminal has remained largely unchanged. But for Warp CEO and co-founder Zach Lloyd, reinventing this core tool is the key to unlocking AI agents for coding, debugging, and automating the entire development process. Zach joins Elad Gil to discuss how seeing this opportunity for innovation led to Warp’s agentic terminal for developers. Zach talks about the phases of software development, from coding by hand to the current "develop by prompt" era, and the coming age of fully automated development. Plus, Zach and Elad explore the deep philosophical questions around intelligence versus consciousness in AI models, and what it would take to believe a computer program is truly aware. Sign up for new podcasts every week. Email feedback to show@no-priors.com Follow us on Twitter: @NoPriorsPod | @Saranormous | @EladGil | @zachlloydtweets | @warpdotdev Chapters: 00:00 – Zach Lloyd Introduction 00:32 – AI, Intelligence, and Consciousness 06:55 – What Warp Does 07:38 – Benefits of the Terminal as a Launchpoint 08:27 – Features Driving Warp’s Adoption 09:12 – Zach’s View of the Coding Market 10:27 – Evolution of Coding Development 12:45 – Importance of Senior Engineer Expertise 14:11 – Future of Security and Other Dev Tools 22:22 – Why Zach Focused on the Terminal 23:52 – The Future of the Model Layer 25:36 – What Zach’s Excited About in the AI Dev World 27:18 – Conclusion

Elad GilhostZach Lloydguest
Oct 23, 202527mWatch on YouTube ↗

EVERY SPOKEN WORD

  1. 0:000:32

    Zach Lloyd Introduction

    1. EG

      Today on No Priors, I'm joined by Zach Lloyd, the co-founder and CEO of Warp, a terminal product and AI tool for developers that allows you to do different sorts of coding applications. Prior to Warp, Zach was at Google, and he also started another company called Self-Made. We talk about AI dev tooling, but we also end up talking about human consciousness and how can you tell if an AI is actually sentient. Zach, welcome to No Priors.

    2. ZL

      I'm excited to be here. Thanks for having me.

  2. 0:326:55

    AI, Intelligence, and Consciousness

    1. ZL

    2. EG

      So, you have a, a master's degree in the philosophy of science.

    3. ZL

      Yeah.

    4. EG

      And if you were to take a very different lens and abstract out of the, you know, coding world and all the things that we tend to think about every day-

    5. ZL

      Yeah.

    6. EG

      ... how do you think about it societally in terms of the big wave of AI that's hitting us right now, and wh- wh- where do you think some of these really big societal impacts will be?

    7. ZL

      The way I think about, like, the advances are it's kinda like we are distilling intelligence.

    8. EG

      Mm-hmm.

    9. ZL

      And so, there are, I think, people who consider what's happening, it's like they're like, "Are we recreating people in some way? Are we recreating consciousness?" But it's not that. It's actually, what's fascinating to me is how much intelligence you can get out of just, like-

    10. EG

      Mm-hmm.

    11. ZL

      ... next token prediction. (laughs)

    12. EG

      Yeah.

    13. ZL

      And, like, what does that say about the way that our minds-

    14. EG

      Mm-hmm.

    15. ZL

      ... work?

    16. EG

      Mm-hmm.

    17. ZL

      Something I'm always thinking about is, like, is this how our brains are working? Are we-

    18. EG

      Yeah.

    19. ZL

      ... are we doing next token prediction? And I don't think so. Like, I think that there's gonna be some further AI unlock.

    20. EG

      There's actually a book about this that I think is really interesting called Blindsight.

    21. ZL

      Okay.

    22. EG

      It's like a sci-fi book where they separate consciousness from intelligence.

    23. ZL

      Yeah.

    24. EG

      And basically, humanity meets a space-faring civilization, or civilization is overstating it, a space-faring intelligent being that's not conscious.

    25. ZL

      Yep.

    26. EG

      And what are the implications of that and how do you think about that and how do you communicate with that? Are you basically saying that that's kind of your view of AI right now?

    27. ZL

      I, I think that's what it is at the moment, is like we've distilled intelligence or something that, like, from, like, an instrumentalist or, like, functional perspective is able to do things that we recognize as intelligence, but it's totally mechanistic, and I don't think anyone who's looking at this thinks that there's any aspect of consciousness-

    28. EG

      Mm-hmm.

    29. ZL

      ... to it. I think that's, like, a, a very confusing thing for people.

    30. EG

      Yeah.

  3. 6:557:38

    What Warp Does

    1. ZL

    2. EG

      You've worked at Google, you've run companies before, you've started companies before. You're now working on Warp. Can you describe what Warp does and how is it different from other tools or companies in the, in the world?

    3. ZL

      Yep. So Warp is what we call an agentic development environment. It's grown out of the terminal. The basic concept of the app at this point is it's a platform for telling your computer what to do. You can sort of tell it in terminal commands, which is Warp's original product, or you can tell it in English, and if you tell it in English, it launches an agent, and the agents can do all manner of development tasks, whether it's coding or setting up a project or debugging while your server's crashing. And so it's a very like horizontal general purpose, and I think unique interface for developing with agents.

  4. 7:388:27

    Benefits of the Terminal as a Launchpoint

    1. ZL

    2. EG

      And so a lot of the other coding tools out there are either just kind of a web interface-

    3. ZL

      Yep.

    4. EG

      ... or they'll do like a cognition, or there's things like Cursor and others where they're like an IDE as a starting point.

    5. ZL

      Yep.

    6. EG

      Obviously Anthropic and Cloud have their own approach. What do you, what do you think is the benefit of doing the terminal and starting there as sort of the launch point for a lot of these products?

    7. ZL

      The competitors are typically like VS Code clones. They all have a sort of IDE-centric approach, or if you're taking a terminal centric approach like Cloud Code, the most common thing is it's just like a pure text-based terminal app. The advantage of being at Warp's layer is like you get the command line interface, but we're the outer app. And so we can do things with the developer experience and the UX, like we can have editing features where we think it's appropriate. We can build like a code review interface, and so we have complete control, but still the terminal first approach.

  5. 8:279:12

    Features Driving Warp’s Adoption

    1. ZL

    2. EG

      Yeah. And y- you folks have been growing really well. Like, so you're close to a million MAUs, you're doing something like a million in new revenue every seven to 10 days.

    3. ZL

      Yeah.

    4. EG

      I mean, like ou- outstanding growth.

    5. ZL

      It's cool.

    6. EG

      Um, are there specific features or use cases or things that are really driving this adoption?

    7. ZL

      Yeah. I, I think the biggest thing was moving into the coding market, to be honest. Like for a long time in Warp's history, we were kind of known as the AI terminal, which is cool and like we supported terminal use cases really well. Like how do I do this thing with Docker or Git? But the action is in coding and like most development activity one way or the other is touching a code base. And so we really started to inflect when we launched a great coding agent.

    8. EG

      Mm-hmm.

    9. ZL

      Which was like three, four months ago, honestly. So that's been the biggest change.

  6. 9:1210:27

    Zach’s View of the Coding Market

    1. ZL

    2. EG

      And how do you think about the different parts of the coding market? There's vibe coding-

    3. ZL

      Yeah.

    4. EG

      ... there's professional code, like are there all, are those all just one thing? Is it, are these separable things or-

    5. ZL

      I think it's pretty separable. So for Warp, our target is pro developers building like software that's economically meaningful. So we, we really wanna like focus on actually people who are using agents to build kind of hard apps, uh, apps that might like go into your Mac doc or be pinned as a Chrome tab, as opposed to vibe coded apps where I think it's more of a long tail play. And so I do think, by the way, it's, it's awesome that anyone can code at this point, but I think if you look at where most of the value is in the software market, it's, it's not in those long tail apps. It's in like a relatively small number of apps that are super heavily used. And that's my background. Like I, you know, I've worked on one of those apps, Google Sheets, and just like I have a lot of passion in terms of helping people build real apps. It's much harder, by the way.

    6. EG

      Mm-hmm.

    7. ZL

      Like I think it's relatively straightforward at this point for a good agent to like, you know, with relatively few prompts build like a web app. It's much harder to apply these agents successfully to pro code bases. Um, so that's where we're focused.

  7. 10:2712:45

    Evolution of Coding Development

    1. ZL

    2. EG

      So I guess one really interesting macro question for me is where is all this heading?

    3. ZL

      Yep.

    4. EG

      And if you look at it, ChatGPT launched in November of '25, excuse me, November of '22.

    5. ZL

      (laughs)

    6. EG

      So, um, three years ago or so.

    7. ZL

      Yep.

    8. EG

      At the time, there was predictions that AI would take over the world and we'd be running down the light cone, and within five years, like everything will change and, you know, human activity would be subsumed by AI. And, you know, there's the old saying in technology that less happens than you think in three years and more happens than you think in five years.

    9. ZL

      Yeah.

    10. EG

      And as you think forward and forward in terms of all these different tools and all these different use cases and vibe coding versus professional coding and the, the role of a software developer, where do you think we are in two, three years?

    11. ZL

      Yeah. So the, the way that I'm thinking of it is there's sort of three phases here. For most of my career, we were in like the world of developed by hand, is how I talk about it.

    12. EG

      Yeah.

    13. ZL

      So my workflow then was like I would open up a code editor, I would find files I wanna change, I would type some code, uh, I'd have some assistive features, and then I would go back to the terminal and I would type commands to build that code. And I think we're switching away from that to something like developed by prompt, where I start most of the coding tasks that I do right now by prompting an agent and that agent does some work. And I think there's a third phase, which is like automated development. Honestly, I think that's like kind of the bigger market here and why people are so excited about this space is you can actually use these agents to automate some parts of the software development process. And so that's like, you know, cognition does that, we're moving into this space. Cursor has background agents. Um-

    14. EG

      Mm-hmm.

    15. ZL

      The rate at which this stuff will happen is like not super clear to me, actually. Like the, the most recent iterations of the models, in my opinion, were not as big of a step change as like-... for instance, when like Sonnet 4 came out, that was a really big step change in coding capability. I think there's gonna be a mix of interactive and automated pieces of development for a while. I, I would guess, like, I don't know, it's so hard to know. Like w- I think within a couple of years, you'll have everyone working by prompt.

    16. EG

      Mm-hmm.

    17. ZL

      And you'll have some slice of development tasks that are just, like, in the background, like a server comes in or a new ticket, a user report comes in. Something, something is automatically done, but I don't think it's gonna be everything. I'd be very

  8. 12:4514:11

    Importance of Senior Engineer Expertise

    1. ZL

      surprised.

    2. EG

      So you, you don't think there's a point at which, you know, all of coding activity just becomes, uh, agents doing it, and then there's like a human who's kind of giving high level directions, like a product manager kind of thing and... Or a, or a eng manager and...

    3. ZL

      Maybe.

    4. EG

      Yeah.

    5. ZL

      I mean, honestly, maybe.

    6. EG

      Yeah.

    7. ZL

      Like, I, I think that... I think it'd be silly for us not to, like, build the infrastructure to enable that. I just don't... I don't know the timeframe, but I do think we're going towards something like that. What I, what I really don't think though is, like, engineering expertise is gonna become devalued.

    8. EG

      Sure.

    9. ZL

      So I think it's actually, in the short term at least, it's more important to know what you're doing as an engineer-

    10. EG

      Yeah.

    11. ZL

      ... than it ever has been.

    12. EG

      And why do you say that? Is it because you need to correct errors that the agents are making? Is it because things may be architected in a way that isn't scalable? Is it something else now?

    13. ZL

      Totally. So it's like, it's like the agents, you can think of them kind of as junior engineers. So if you didn't have someone who was senior watching them, you end up in a situation where these agents will make code that creates bugs, it could create s- security issues.

    14. EG

      Yeah.

    15. ZL

      It could cause your codebase to become really unmaintainable.

    16. EG

      Mm-hmm.

    17. ZL

      And so there's actually, like, a premium right now-

    18. EG

      Mm-hmm.

    19. ZL

      ... on these senior engineering skills where you can architect, where you can review code-

    20. EG

      Mm-hmm.

    21. ZL

      ... you can make sure the system doesn't degrade.

    22. EG

      Mm-hmm.

    23. ZL

      And so again, I would be... If I were, like, early in my CS career-

    24. EG

      Mm-hmm.

    25. ZL

      ... I would be racing towards building that expertise.

    26. EG

      Mm-hmm.

    27. ZL

      Where you don't wanna be, I think, is like someone who is just, like, perpetually in the junior engineer state, because I do think that's at risk.

  9. 14:1122:22

    Future of Security and Other Dev Tools

    1. ZL

      Yeah.

    2. EG

      And then how do you think about different security tools? Does that... So for example, um, there's tools like Socket or Snyk or others who are, are basically looking at, you know, whether code has... or, uh, open source packets or other things have vulnerabilities in them.

    3. ZL

      Yeah.

    4. EG

      Or they're looking at different aspects of, um, security holes for code-

    5. ZL

      Yeah.

    6. EG

      ... in general. Do you think that just becomes part of these quoting tools, or do you think there will always be those tr- sort of standalone companies? I'm just sort of curious how the overall...

    7. ZL

      It's, it's a, an awesome question. So I think tools like that become more important. I think anything that does, like, either automatic security analysis or automatic verification, I think actually, like, languages like Rust, things that have stronger guarantees around safety by default, where you don't need to rely on, like, a human reviewer, become more valuable. Whether those things, like, get integrated or bundled into the coding agents, I actually don't have a strong take on. I'm curious if you have a take, but no, I, I think that the actual fundamental problem becomes more important.

    8. EG

      Yeah.

    9. ZL

      Yeah.

    10. EG

      What do you think gets bundled? And what-

    11. ZL

      What's that?

    12. EG

      What do you think gets bundled? Like, what sorts of tools do you think? Because there's this whole world of dev tools.

    13. ZL

      Yeah.

    14. EG

      And there's a security aspect of it, but there's lots of others. There's design related things, there's... There, you know, there's a huge spectrum.

    15. ZL

      Yeah.

    16. EG

      What do you think just gets... just becomes part of coding tooling?

    17. ZL

      I think there's gonna be a class of tools where you sort of start from the front end. This would be things like Lovable or Bolt or Replit or maybe even Figma Make if you're coming from the design side, and you'll have, like, an all-in-one platform for build an app or even, like, honestly, like build a business.

    18. EG

      Mm-hmm.

    19. ZL

      Like put payments in it.

    20. EG

      Uh-huh.

    21. ZL

      It's like, it's kind of like the evolution of, like, either a Shopify storefront or, like, WordPress-

    22. EG

      Yeah.

    23. ZL

      ... or Squarespace or something like that. So I think that's all gonna be bundled. More on, like, the core pro developer side, I can't tell if it's gonna be a world of, like, MCPs and integrations and, like, all these tools' sort of interplay. That's one approach. Or it's gonna be more, like, there's enough alpha and, like, you put all of these things together, and I think Warp is a little bit more like this. Like, we're trying to build a single pane of glass, for instance, for doing, like, local agents and remote agents.

    24. EG

      Mm-hmm. Yeah.

    25. ZL

      And if you get a way better developer experience through the bundling, I think that that approach could win. But I don't know. Like MCP, I think is a pretty valuable approach as well, but it's not perfect because you end up, like, with this, this sort of secondhand data coming into all these tools.

    26. EG

      Yeah. It's really interesting because if you look at different industries, early in the industry, things tend to be fragmented often, not always.

    27. ZL

      Okay.

    28. EG

      And then late in the evolution of an industry, things get bundled.

    29. ZL

      Yeah.

    30. EG

      And then when there's a technology disruption, things debundle again and you have point apps and then they start bundling them.

  10. 22:2223:52

    Why Zach Focused on the Terminal

    1. ZL

    2. EG

      What made you decide to focus on Terminal? So, you know, we've-

    3. ZL

      Yeah.

    4. EG

      We started talking years ago when you first started doing Warp.

    5. ZL

      Yep.

    6. EG

      And even then, I think you had really interesting ideas about how to rethink the Terminal and how to use that as a launching point for all sorts of things.

    7. ZL

      Yeah.

    8. EG

      Could you explain that thinking and how it's evolved over time?

    9. ZL

      Yeah, so the, the basic insight or thing that got me excited about Warp to begin with is like, you have this tool that is pretty much a daily use tool for every developer. It's that and the code editor, and the Terminal itself is something that, you know, really hadn't changed much in the last 40 years. It's a tool also where it's like if you get good at it, you can really get a lot done. If you use it, it like works across all these different parts of software development, not just code writing. On the flip side, from my perspective, not a good product, just like hard to learn, hard to use, hard to remember commands, super intimidating, and just like kind of like a gatekeeping vibe around it as well, in my opinion. And so the original concept with Warp was like, let's build a better product there-

    10. EG

      Yeah.

    11. ZL

      ... and see if people will like using it. The business concept has evolved a ton, like the original business concept was like building a collaboration platform, which-

    12. EG

      Mm-hmm.

    13. ZL

      ... is like we've, we've just changed our model to be an agent platform, because it's, it's like m- way more demand for that than a collaboration platform around the Terminal. But the, the sort of core insight that this is an important tool, it's crazy. It's actually kind of been validated through all these agentic things that are very Terminal first.

  11. 23:5225:36

    The Future of the Model Layer

    1. ZL

    2. EG

      You know, one thing that I, that you mentioned I thought was interesting is that at some point, the model layer may commoditize in terms of its coding abilities.

    3. ZL

      Yeah.

    4. EG

      How far on that asymptote do you think we are? How close to that do you think we are?

    5. ZL

      God, I, I don't know. I think that the... Increasingly, the limit that we see is context.

    6. EG

      Mm-hmm.

    7. ZL

      And like the, the reasoning capabilities of the models are pretty impressive. The problem is like understanding an entire code base or understanding sources outside of the code or literally just understanding user intent are challenging problems. I still think there's probably much more to do on the model side, but...I don't know is, is the short answer.

    8. EG

      And do you think that, um, from a model capabilities perspective, we've hit a point where, to your point, it feels like certain aspects of the models are slowing down in terms of the benefits or outcomes of further investment of certain types, at least?

    9. ZL

      I, I think so. Like, if you take, like, Sonnet 4 to 4.5, and we're big partners with Anthropic, they have great models, like, that was, like, a few percentage point increase on SWE Bench for us-

    10. EG

      Mm-hmm, yeah.

    11. ZL

      ... and we invest, you know, we've invested a decent amount to be one of the top agents on SWE Bench. And when we went from 3.7 to 4, it was a much more significant-

    12. EG

      Yeah.

    13. ZL

      ... boost. So I, again, that's, like, not, I don't know what that means about the total underlying trends. I think something with GPT-5 was somewhat similar, like, certainly an upgrade, and GPT-5, I think, is actually pretty much on par, has different, like, feel to it and higher latency, but it didn't feel to me, like, as much of a step change as some of the upgrades before.

    14. EG

      Mm-hmm, yeah, makes sense.

  12. 25:3627:18

    What Zach’s Excited About in the AI Dev World

    1. EG

      What other areas of the AI dev world are you excited about?

    2. ZL

      I am, um... So I'm really excited about not just, like, the interactive piece of agents, the way most people are working today, but what can you do if you can program against these agents? And so for instance, it's like, if you have, uh, a version of Warp that's, like, headless, for instance, you can put it in CI and you can start to do crazy things where it's like, okay, every time someone updates the code, make sure the documentation stays up to date. It's like, that's very annoying for a developer-

    3. EG

      Yeah.

    4. ZL

      ... and so allowing developers to automate parts of their job that they don't like doing, I think is, like, a big capability. And then from a business perspective, just, like, automation is a better place to be than productivity enhancement. Like, one of the challenges with our business, I think with a lot of the coding businesses is just, like, proving the ROI. Like, and there have been these studies that show like, you know, you deploy this stuff on real code bases, it's kind of unclear if it's actually having an impact, whereas if you get something that's more outcome-oriented or more just like an automation, I think it's easier to prove the ROI, and then you're also not limited by time spent behind keyboard for doing this type of stuff. So from a business perspective, I'm, I'm very excited about, like, what's unlocked if developers can program these agents.

    5. EG

      Well, Zach, fascinating. Thank you so much for joining us at No Priors.

    6. ZL

      Thank you for having me. This was great. (instrumental music)

    7. NA

      Find us on Twitter @nopriorspod. Subscribe to our YouTube channel if you wanna see our faces. Follow the show on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen. That way, you get a new episode every week. And sign up for emails or find transcripts for every episode at no-priors.com.

Episode duration: 27:18

Install uListen for AI-powered chat & search across the full episode — Get Full Transcript

Transcript of episode 62zPmXzVDTo

Get more out of YouTube videos.

High quality summaries for YouTube videos. Accurate transcripts to search & find moments. Powered by ChatGPT & Claude AI.

Add to Chrome