Origin Story w/ David McIntosh JrEmotional Support Vapes, Girl Math & Apple Vision Pro: Why Reason Isn’t Running the Show
CHAPTERS
- 0:00 – 4:49
Comedians as 'free sociologists' and why humor drives innovation
David and Rory open with banter and quickly move into why comedians are unusually valuable observers of human behavior. Rory argues humor is essentially deviation-from-expectation, which maps directly to how attention and innovation work in markets.
- •Comedians’ edge: noticing patterns and social truths others miss
- •Humor as expectation-violation and a tool for creative problem solving
- •Why businesses should involve comedians in innovation and marketing
- •Attention—not technical benchmarking—often determines success
- 4:49 – 9:22
Reverse benchmarking: the 11 Madison Park lesson for standing out
Rory introduces 'reverse benchmarking' via Will Guidara’s strategy at Eleven Madison Park: don’t copy what the best already do well; fix what they do disappointingly. The discussion frames differentiation as focusing on neglected dimensions that create surprise and talk value.
- •The trap of sector benchmarking and competing on the same metrics
- •Reverse benchmarking: double down on competitors’ weak points
- •Coffee and beer 'sommeliers' as memorable differentiators
- •Optimizing for attention and surprise vs. incremental improvement
- 9:22 – 14:04
Prediction-based perception (and why Apple Vision Pro/3D often disappoints)
Rory connects perception science to product adoption, arguing much of experience is prediction with sensory correction. This helps explain why 3D and hyper-real VR/AR can be less compelling than expected—our brains already construct depth from 2D signals.
- •Perception as prediction; senses correct ‘prediction error’
- •Why 3D isn’t as essential as tech makers assume
- •Two eyes: redundancy and limited 3D advantage in daily life
- •Designing for perceived experience, not objective measures
- 14:04 – 15:34
Designing for emotion: control, hypnosis aversion, and 'the illusion of agency'
The conversation turns to Rory’s discomfort with losing control (hypnosis, intoxication) despite his belief in unconscious decision-making. They use this to illustrate how the feeling of control shapes behavior even when it’s partly illusory.
- •Loss-of-control aversion as a real behavioral driver
- •Introversion vs. performing publicly (energy cost of socializing)
- •Why people cling to the illusion of control
- •Nootropics, nicotine, and self-regulation as coping tools
- 15:34 – 19:56
Nicotine, manners, and 'emotional support vapes' (plus Hooters Air)
Rory provocatively reframes nicotine as a potentially functional tool for some people and criticizes one-sided drug cost analyses. He riffs on inconsistent norms—emotional support animals on planes vs. banning vaping—and detours into absurd branding ideas like KFC vape flavors and Hooters Air.
- •Cost-benefit vs. cost-only analysis of recreational drugs
- •Nicotine as self-medication and cultural catalyst (tea/coffee/tobacco)
- •Social norms: emotional support animals vs. nicotine restrictions
- •Branding and category weirdness as a lens on regulation
- 19:56 – 25:10
ADHD, neurodiversity, and the explore/exploit model of thinking
Rory discusses ADHD and broader 'spectrum' traits as potentially group-beneficial rather than purely disordered. He links this to Iain McGilchrist’s hemispheric model and to the explore/exploit dynamic in algorithms and human problem solving.
- •Neurodiversity as group advantage in social species
- •McGilchrist: narrow vs. broad attention as complementary modes
- •Explore/exploit is not a trade-off but a system
- •Why societies should ‘cherish’ creative types (within limits)
- 25:10 – 34:30
Why rationality fails at problem-solving: policing, anecdotes, and COVID-era 'the science'
Rory argues rationality is useful at decisive moments, but harmful as a default because it narrows too soon and implies one correct answer. He illustrates with police work: anecdotes guide investigation even if they aren’t courtroom evidence, a distinction he says got muddled in public debates during COVID.
- •Rationality as ‘cavalry charges’: decisive but not constant
- •Two-phase investigations: broad search then evidential narrowing
- •Anecdotes as directional signals (not proof)
- •How ‘science’ rhetoric can prematurely shut down exploration
- 34:30 – 38:52
Money as psychology: 'Girl Math,' price-as-feeling, and the rise of private clubs
They explore how people mentally partition money, making ‘savings’ feel like earnings and prices feel relative. Rory uses private members clubs (RAC Club) and airline lounges to show how excludability, safety, and framing create value beyond the tangible perks.
- •Mental accounting (‘cookie jar economics’) and non-fungible money
- •‘Girl Math’ reframing: savings as gains
- •Price is a feeling; comparison sets perceived value
- •Clubs/lounges: excludability creates trust and convenience
- 38:52 – 44:12
Marketing micro-insight: the power of one word ('Indian Street Food and Cafe')
Rory tells a tactical branding story about Chaiiwala and how a single conjunction changes customer interpretation. The chapter emphasizes ‘dogs that don’t bark’—unmeasured, subtle cues that determine whether people feel invited or excluded.
- •Tacit rules: what differentiates a cafe from a restaurant
- •One-word positioning shift expands addressable audience
- •‘Dogs that don’t bark’: the impact of missing/implicit signals
- •Why great marketers focus on friction and misinterpretation
- 44:12 – 49:12
Run clubs, the invention of jogging, and changing social norms over time
The discussion reframes jogging as a once-bizarre behavior needing cultural adoption, similar to early mobile phone usage. Rory argues big ideas require marketing precisely because they demand behavior change, and uses dial-up-to-broadband as a reminder of how hard adoption can be.
- •Jogging as a historically new social practice (even arrest-worthy)
- •How norms flip: early mobile phone users were mocked
- •Behavior change is the real product; marketing is essential
- •Broadband adoption as a case study in ‘selling the obvious’
- 49:12 – 54:17
Club Penguin nostalgia and the hidden educational value of playful systems
David and Rory reminisce about Club Penguin—its puzzles, economies, and emotional attachment (puffles running away). The segment highlights how well-designed playful environments teach problem-solving and create real feelings of loss and investment.
- •Digital worlds can generate genuine attachment and grief
- •Gamified puzzles as education and cognitive training
- •Disney acquisition and shutdown as a product/market mystery
- •Why ‘bring it back’ reflects unmet demand for safe online play
- 54:17 – 1:00:53
Walkable cities by adding benches: counterintuitive behavior change design
Rory proposes a deliberately ‘opposite’ solution to increase walking: add more places to sit, not just more paths. He argues cities are harsh on people near the mobility margin (older adults, pain sufferers), and that small environmental supports unlock larger behavior shifts.
- •Behavior change often needs counterintuitive interventions
- •Benches reduce the perceived risk/cost of walking farther
- •Designing for the ‘mobility margin’ rather than the athletic
- •Airports and cities often ignore the in-between disabled group
- 1:00:53 – 1:06:50
Heathrow Pod obsession and how procurement kills category-changing innovation
Rory celebrates Heathrow’s autonomous pods as a transport model people love but institutions undervalue. He argues procurement compares new ideas against old metrics (bus/tram), missing the real benefit—privacy and autonomy—then broadens into why infrastructure fails without marketing.
- •Heathrow Pods succeed because the ride is enjoyable (not just efficient)
- •Innovations can be worse on legacy metrics but better on new ones
- •Procurement’s comparison framework blocks truly new categories
- •Infrastructure without marketing: the Edinburgh tram usability gap
- 1:06:50 – 1:10:13
Good markets end bad products: promise vs. delivery, and spotlighting ‘different good’
Rory rejects the idea that advertising can rescue a truly bad product; it can only reframe and highlight what’s differently valuable. He uses Ryanair, Apple aesthetics, and hotel brands (Moxy/CitizenM) to show how low promise + targeted strengths can outperform feature-maximizing competitors.
- •‘No faster way to kill a bad product than good advertising’
- •Low promise / slightly-better-than-expected as a strategy (Ryanair)
- •Reverse benchmarking + spotlight: do the neglected thing extremely well
- •Apple, Moxy, and CitizenM as differentiation-by-new-metrics examples
- 1:10:13 – 1:25:35
Drones, safety, and commitment devices: from defibrillators to JP Morgan interviews
They explore drone delivery as a psychological adoption problem more than a tech one, including safety statistics and potential public-good framing (medical deliveries). Rory then ties trust to ‘commitment devices’—hard onboarding (black cab badges, JP Morgan interviews) that makes bad behavior costly—plus a memorable Tim Hortons drug-code story.
- •Public acceptance depends on framing drones as social utility, not laziness
- •Surprisingly low accidental drone-death record vs. other transport
- •Tim Hortons ‘Timbits’ as covert code: illicit markets hijack channels
- •Trust via commitment devices: badges, strict licensing, costly entry
- 1:25:35 – 1:35:28
Quick-fire origin-story closer: introversion, fame trade-offs, and mental health candor
In the closing rapid questions, Rory shares what he’d do outside advertising, when he feels most himself, and his experience with depression and anxiety. He reflects on manageable late-life fame, reputational constraints, and the value of being generous with attention and status.
- •Ideal social setting: conversations between 3 and 9 people
- •Two bouts of anxiety/depression and the autonomy loss of mood disorders
- •Fame as reputational discipline; manageable vs. life-consuming celebrity
- •Generosity with attention: helping others isn’t zero-sum
