Skip to content
Peter Attia MDPeter Attia MD

Cardiovascular disease & why we should change the way we assess risk | The Peter Attia Drive Podcast

Read full show notes here: https://bit.ly/3r2hU9A Subscribe to receive exclusive subscriber-only content: https://bit.ly/3r7TUSg Sign up to receive Peter's email newsletter: https://bit.ly/3G1kr8n Allan Sniderman is a highly acclaimed Professor of Cardiology and Medicine at McGill University and a foremost expert in cardiovascular disease (CVD). In this episode, Allan explains the many risk factors used to predict atherosclerosis, including triglycerides, cholesterol, and lipoproteins, and he makes the case for apoB as a superior metric that is currently being underutilized. Allan expresses his frustration with the current scientific climate and its emphasis on consensus and unanimity over encouraging multiple viewpoints, thus holding back the advancement of metrics like apoB for assessing CVD risk, treatment, and prevention strategies. Finally, Allan illuminates his research that led to his 30-year causal model of risk and explains the potentially life-saving advantages of early intervention for the prevention of future disease. We discuss: 00:00:00 - Intro 00:00:10 - Problems with the current 10-year risk assessment of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and the implications for prevention 00:14:32 - A primer on cholesterol, apoB, and plasma lipoproteins 00:22:07 - Pathophysiology of CVD and the impact of particle cholesterol concentration vs. number of particles 00:28:45 - Limitations of standard blood panels 00:33:10 - Remnant type III hyperlipoproteinemia—high cholesterol, low Apo B, high triglyceride 00:39:26 - Using apoB to estimate risk of CVD 00:42:57 - How Mendelian randomization is bolstering the case for ApoB as the superior metric for risk prediction 00:53:47 - Hypertension and CVD risk 01:05:49 - Factors influencing the decision to begin preventative intervention for CVD 01:11:37 - Using the coronary artery calcium (CAC) score as a predictive tool 01:23:27 - The challenge of motivating individuals to take early interventions 01:26:30 - How medical advancement is hindered by the lack of critical thinking once a “consensus” is reached 01:33:24 - PSK9 inhibitors and familial hypercholesterolemia: two examples of complex topics with differing interpretations of the science 01:39:49 - Defining risk and uncertainty in the guidelines 01:46:07 - Making clinical decisions in the face of uncertainty 01:51:58 - How the emphasis on consensus and unanimity has become a crucial weakness for science and medicine 01:59:58 - Factors holding back the advancement of apoB for assessing CVD risk, treatment, and prevention strategies 02:11:44 - Advantages of a 30-year risk assessment and early intervention -------- About: The Peter Attia Drive is a weekly, ultra-deep-dive podcast focusing on maximizing health, longevity, critical thinking…and a few other things. With over 35 million episodes downloaded, it features topics including fasting, ketosis, Alzheimer’s disease, cancer, mental health, and much more. Peter is a physician focusing on the applied science of longevity. His practice deals extensively with nutritional interventions, exercise physiology, sleep physiology, emotional and mental health, and pharmacology to increase lifespan (delay the onset of chronic disease), while simultaneously improving healthspan (quality of life). Learn more: https://bit.ly/3rbsBXk Connect with Peter on: Facebook: http://bit.ly/PeterAttiaMDFB Twitter: http://bit.ly/PeterAttiaMDTW Instagram: http://bit.ly/PeterAttiaMDIG Subscribe to The Drive: Apple Podcast: http://bit.ly/TheDriveApplePodcasts Overcast: http://bit.ly/TheDriveOvercast Spotify: http://bit.ly/TheDriveSpotify Google Podcasts: http://bit.ly/TheDriveGoogle

Peter AttiahostAllan Snidermanguest
Nov 29, 20212h 25mWatch on YouTube ↗

At a glance

WHAT IT’S REALLY ABOUT

Why 10-Year Risk Models Fail and ApoB Should Guide Prevention

  1. Sniderman argues that 10-year risk calculators are driven mainly by age and sex, so they delay prevention until about age 55-60 even though nearly half of heart attacks and strokes occur before 60.
  2. Atherosclerosis begins in the first decades of life, so treating late modifies existing disease while starting early can stop lesions from forming.
  3. ApoB counts the atherogenic particles that actually enter the artery wall, and Sniderman says it outperforms LDL-C and non-HDL-C, is cheap and standardized, and is needed to diagnose conditions like remnant type III.
  4. Mendelian randomization and the failure of HDL-raising drugs, in Sniderman's account, support ApoB as causal and HDL cholesterol as not causal.
  5. Sniderman criticizes guideline consensus and unanimity, the lack of confidence intervals on risk numbers, and the resistance to change, while Attia pushes back on his pessimism and adds the compounding-benefit analogy.

IDEAS WORTH REMEMBERING

5 ideas

Ten-year risk models make premature disease prevention nearly impossible.

Sniderman says age and sex drive the calculation, so most people under 60 look low-risk even though there are so many of them that the absolute number of events is high.

Atherosclerosis starts decades before clinical events.

Pathology work by Stary showed disease gaining a foothold in the first three decades, and Attia recalled autopsy images of young accident victims already showing atherosclerosis; Sniderman notes that once artery architecture is destroyed it cannot be restored.

Particle number matters more than cholesterol content.

Cholesterol reaches the artery wall only inside ApoB particles, so two people with the same LDL-C but different particle counts have different risk, and discordance analyses favor ApoB.

ApoB reveals conditions that a standard panel misses.

Remnant type III, with high cholesterol and triglycerides but low ApoB, can only be diagnosed when ApoB is measured, and it is treatable with statins and/or fibrates.

A coronary calcium score of zero should not override a high ApoB.

Sniderman views calcification as a sign of advanced disease, so a negative score does not mean the artery is healthy; a positive score in a young person is a clear alarm.

WORDS WORTH SAVING

5 quotes

So stopping disease is perfect prevention. Treating disease is partial prevention, and it has to be partial. Can't be more.

— Allan Sniderman

Any process that has unanimous recommendations has a weakness. Any process where the decisions become larger than the individuals who, who propose them has a weakness.

— Allan Sniderman

Science is about change. If we're still saying the same things we said 30 years ago, eh, could be a problem, because we should have learned how to say it better, more accurately.

— Allan Sniderman

The rate of events is low, but the absolute number of events is high.

— Allan Sniderman

I don't think we should ever compromise on truth, because when you do, you say, "I've got to do this in order to get to here."

— Allan Sniderman

Flaws of 10-year risk calculatorsApoB versus LDL-C and non-HDL-CNatural history of atherosclerosisRemnant type III dyslipoproteinemiaMendelian randomization and causalityCoronary artery calcium score limitsGuideline consensus and uncertainty

High quality AI-generated summary created from speaker-labeled transcript.

Get more out of YouTube videos.

Read along on your phone, search it beside the video, or ask your favorite AI app what was said.

iOSAndroidClaudeChromeChatGPTComing soon