Joe Rogan Experience #2065 - David Grusch

Joe Rogan Experience #2065 - David Grusch

The Joe Rogan ExperienceJun 27, 20242h 41m

Joe Rogan (host), David Grusch (guest)

Grusch’s intelligence background and path into the UAP Task ForcePilot and military witness accounts of anomalous craft and effectsAlleged decades‑long crash retrieval and reverse‑engineering programsHistorical cases (e.g., 1933 Italy, Roswell era, Lockheed Martin ties)Congressional oversight, whistleblower complaints, and alleged reprisalsCurrent U.S. legislation: Schumer UAP Disclosure Act and political resistanceTheories on non‑human intelligence origins, consciousness, and societal impact

In this episode of The Joe Rogan Experience, featuring Joe Rogan and David Grusch, Joe Rogan Experience #2065 - David Grusch explores whistleblower David Grusch Alleges Secret UFO Crash Retrieval, Cover-Up, Risk Intelligence officer and whistleblower David Grusch details his 14-year career in U.S. military and civilian intelligence and describes how he was drawn into the Pentagon’s UAP (UFO) investigations starting in 2019.

Whistleblower David Grusch Alleges Secret UFO Crash Retrieval, Cover-Up, Risk

Intelligence officer and whistleblower David Grusch details his 14-year career in U.S. military and civilian intelligence and describes how he was drawn into the Pentagon’s UAP (UFO) investigations starting in 2019.

He claims to have spoken with dozens of highly cleared officials and reviewed classified reports indicating long-running, deeply compartmentalized crash‑retrieval and reverse‑engineering programs involving non‑human craft and biological remains, including incidents dating back to at least the 1930s.

Grusch argues these programs have been hidden from lawful congressional oversight, funneled through defense contractors, and protected with extreme secrecy—sometimes to the detriment of scientific progress, national security, and democratic accountability.

He supports legislative efforts like the Schumer UAP Disclosure Amendment, calls for a truth‑and‑reconciliation style approach, and warns that continued stonewalling by powerful interests and certain members of Congress risks both uncontrolled disclosure and loss of U.S. leadership on the issue.

Key Takeaways

Highly compartmentalized UAP programs may be bypassing lawful oversight.

Grusch says multiple senior officials told him of crash‑retrieval and reverse‑engineering efforts that were never properly briefed to Congress or even some Gang of Eight members, raising serious constitutional and governance concerns.

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

There is a substantial body of classified testimony and documentation behind his claims.

He reports interviewing about 40 insiders—from engineers to multi‑star generals—reviewing intel reports (including foreign assessments of U. ...

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

Defense contractors allegedly hold non‑human materials under extreme secrecy.

Grusch describes historical efforts like Harry Reid’s attempt to move material from a Lockheed facility into a formal SAP, claims that intact craft and fragments exist, and notes that secrecy and narrow ‘rice bowls’ have impeded scientific progress and even contractor recruitment.

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

Political and industrial pushback threaten meaningful, structured disclosure.

He singles out Representatives Mike Turner and Mike Rogers as blocking the Schumer Disclosure Amendment, arguing that special interests and fear of legal and financial fallout (e. ...

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

Grusch alleges reprisals and intimidation for pursuing the issue.

He recounts multi‑agency attempts to revoke his clearance, unfounded mental‑health accusations, career damage to colleagues, and two disturbing personal incidents meant to “show they could touch” him and his wife, all now part of ongoing inspector‑general investigations.

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

Non‑human intelligence is framed broadly as ‘NHI,’ not just ‘ET.’

He says insiders commonly used ‘extraterrestrial’ but favors the broader term ‘non‑human intelligence’ to encompass possibilities like interdimensional or higher‑dimensional phenomena, time‑displaced humans, or origins we can’t yet conceptualize.

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

Grusch believes controlled, multiyear disclosure is necessary and feasible.

He supports the Schumer Amendment’s idea of a presidential commission of scientists, economists, and sociologists to plan a six‑year disclosure timeline, arguing that 90%+ of information could be responsibly released while narrowly protecting genuine weapons‑related secrets.

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

Notable Quotes

The answer is, we’re not alone, and I know that with 100% certainty.

David Grusch

Dudes with SCI clearances do not have an embargo on reality.

David Grusch

If there’s nothing to see here, why are Mike Rogers and Mike Turner blocking the most important transparency legislation in American history?

David Grusch

I ruined my fucking career doing this… I couldn’t just keep that secret because I thought it was perverse and wrong that people don’t even get to know the basics.

David Grusch

This subject is one of the only unifying, ontologically shocking topics that could change humanity for the better and make us less divisive.

David Grusch

Questions Answered in This Episode

If a presidential disclosure panel is created, what specific categories of UAP information should be prioritized for immediate public release versus long‑term protection?

Intelligence officer and whistleblower David Grusch details his 14-year career in U. ...

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

How could current scientific institutions—universities, national labs, independent foundations—responsibly validate or refute claims about non‑human materials without compromising national security?

He claims to have spoken with dozens of highly cleared officials and reviewed classified reports indicating long-running, deeply compartmentalized crash‑retrieval and reverse‑engineering programs involving non‑human craft and biological remains, including incidents dating back to at least the 1930s.

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

What practical mechanisms could a ‘truth and reconciliation’ process include to address alleged legal violations, contractor favoritism, and human‑rights abuses tied to UAP secrecy?

Grusch argues these programs have been hidden from lawful congressional oversight, funneled through defense contractors, and protected with extreme secrecy—sometimes to the detriment of scientific progress, national security, and democratic accountability.

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

How might confirmed evidence of non‑human intelligence reshape global politics, religion, and concepts of human identity over the next few decades?

He supports legislative efforts like the Schumer UAP Disclosure Amendment, calls for a truth‑and‑reconciliation style approach, and warns that continued stonewalling by powerful interests and certain members of Congress risks both uncontrolled disclosure and loss of U. ...

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

What safeguards should be in place so that any technological breakthroughs from alleged reverse‑engineering programs benefit humanity broadly, rather than just a small set of governments and corporations?

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

Transcript Preview

Joe Rogan

(drumbeats) Joe Rogan podcast. Check it out.

David Grusch

The Joe Rogan Experience. Train by day, Joe Rogan podcast by night. All day. (rock music plays) What's up?

Joe Rogan

How are you, man?

David Grusch

Hey. Good, good.

Joe Rogan

Thanks for coming here. Appreciate it.

David Grusch

Y- yeah. (laughs) Yeah. No, it's, it's a pleasure.

Joe Rogan

You've been on a whirlwind sort of tour. Um, I guess we should start from the beginning.

David Grusch

Yeah.

Joe Rogan

So first of all, uh, lay out to people what your job was with the military and how this all started for you.

David Grusch

Yeah, yeah. So I was a Intel officer in the Air Force for 14 years, seven active, seven reserve. Uh, then I kind of had, like, a parallel track in the civilian intel world when I became a reservist. Um, (smacks lips) uh, and, uh, ultimately, I got brought back in in civil service in a government way at the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency couple years ago, um, at a senior level. Uh, so I was a major in the Air Force and a GS-15 at NGA, which is, like, a full bird colonel equivalent civilian employee. Uh, you know, I'm very humbled that I was able to kind of get that kind of job. But, uh, my career, mostly, I didn't even really think about this topic. UFOs were not on my radar. I wasn't really a believer. I was agnostic about it. Uh, pre- most of my career, I did a lot of, uh, you know, behind the door special access program, uh, technical type activities. I was kind of a space intelligence expert, a cyber intel expert. And, uh, like I said, this was not on my radar at all. You know, like, I would joke with my buddies, 'cause I used to handle, um, the presidential daily brief for the National Reconnaissance Office director in my, my military capacity as a reservist. And I was well cleared to hundreds and hundreds of compartmented programs. And, you know, the joke was like, "When are we gonna get the read on for the crazy shit?" And that never happened. Uh, and, and I do remember the, the day that I really can remember that I was like, "Huh, what's with this UFO stuff?" I was, uh, briefing a senior person, uh, at the CIA into a couple hundred special access programs. Uh, so I was at the headquarters at the agency. And, you know, after the indoctrination I was giving to the senior person, this person, um, who worked with, uh, Lue Elizondo, uh, previously was like, "Yeah, have... Dave, have you ever heard of this guy, Lue Elizondo? He's running some UFO program at the Pentagon. Um, we all think he's crazy." And I'm like, "I, I don't know who this guy Lue Elizondo is, and I don't know of any kind of UFO program. So that sounds nuts to me." But lo and behold, and that was like early 2017, and lo and beholds in December 2017, that New York Times article came out with the, uh, that named the AATIP program and the AAWSAP program, so Advanced Aerospace Weapons Systems Application Program and Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program being the other acronym. And I was like, "Holy shit. Wait, that's that guy Lue Elizondo that I heard about. Oh, you know what? I think I have heard of AAWSAP." When I was a lieutenant, I used to read these reports from the Defense Intelligence Agency on black holes and stuff, and I was like, "Huh, that's, like, stupid. Why is the DIA, um, looking into black holes, time warps?" It just didn't make any sense to me back in, like, '08, '09 when I was a lieutenant. And all of a sudden, I'm like, "Well, maybe there's something to this UFO thing." I'm not saying I was, like, a believer either way on the subject, but this i- this was a topic of concern apparently for the Pentagon. And in 2018, I started doing kind of my, what I call my open source literature review. Like, "Let me spin myself up on this topic," watching Chris Mellon, Lue Elizondo, Leslie Kean, all these people talk about the subject and then, you know, just trying to understand, so what is this with UFOs? Has this been going on for a while? The answer is yes, like Foo Fighters, sightings of weird stuff in antiquity, et cetera, which, you know, we can get into later. But, uh, and so early 2019 comes along, and my boss at the National Reconnaissance Office, in kind of my Air Force major capacity, forwarded me an email from the, what became a, uh, stood up in, like, I guess it was 2018, which was the unidentified, well it was aerial, now anonym- anonymous phenomena task force, UAP task force. So the UAP task force director sent my boss an email saying, "Hey, we're looking for a rep to the task force." And as, like any good officer, I was like, "Well, I'll put it on my performance report. Hey, I was on a task force," and, you know, that would look good. And I ha- being well cleared and also, uh, bachelor's degree in physics, uh, master's in intelligence analysis, I'm like, "You know what? I'll figure out what this shit is. It's either gonna be weather shit. Maybe it's an adversarial program. Maybe it's, like, uh, a US program people are misidentifying on rare occasions. So fuck it, I'll, I'll go see where the data takes me." And, you know, early 2019 or so, I joined the UAP task force. Um, and then I started, you know, interviewing pilots, um, uh, flag officers, you know, general officer equivalent type Navy folks. And, you know, they were seeing some really crazy shit. And, uh, like a, you know, event that I talked about previously publicly in a YouTube video on, uh, the, uh, Yes Theory channel, you know, I... There was this one 30-year senior Navy officer that, you know, he was going to work sober, no predisposition for fantasy, all that kind of stuff, 'cause I interviewed the individual for a couple hours, and he saw this, you know, crazy triangle hover over his car going to work at a certain naval facility. And it, like, blew his mind. He was serious. Um, the paint on his car turned milky white after the incident. So that's, to me, that sounds like ionizing radiation. So like ultraviolet, just like how your-... your headlights get all foggy over time if you park your car out in the sun. Same phenomenon just happened, you know, within a 24-hour period. And I'm like, "Whoa. If this is true and the, the, the oral testimony and, you know, crazy radar data that I saw when I was in the taskforce, you know, stuff making turns that didn't make any sense, well, holy shit, what is this stuff then?"

Install uListen to search the full transcript and get AI-powered insights

Get Full Transcript

Get more from every podcast

AI summaries, searchable transcripts, and fact-checking. Free forever.

Add to Chrome