JRE MMA Show #11 with John Danaher

JRE MMA Show #11 with John Danaher

The Joe Rogan ExperienceJan 15, 20182h 38m

Joe Rogan (host), John Danaher (guest), Narrator

Danaher’s background: philosophy, bouncing, and discovering Brazilian jiu-jitsuCultural shift from striking arts to grappling in real fighting effectivenessThe history, stigma, and systematic redevelopment of leg locks in jiu-jitsuSystems-based coaching: control vs. submission, ashi garami, and ‘double trouble’Integrated subsystems in jiu-jitsu (legs, back, front headlock, kimura, etc.)Danaher’s role with Georges St-Pierre: shoot boxing, game-planning, and comebacksAnalysis of elite MMA fighters and concepts of setups, pace, and directional control

In this episode of The Joe Rogan Experience, featuring Joe Rogan and John Danaher, JRE MMA Show #11 with John Danaher explores john Danaher Dissects Jiu-Jitsu Systems, Leg Locks, MMA and Greatness John Danaher traces his journey from philosophy PhD and nightclub bouncer to becoming one of jiu-jitsu’s most influential coaches, explaining how grappling revolutionized his understanding of real fighting. He details how a single sentence from Dean Lister led him to systematically rethink leg locks, turning a taboo, low-status tactic into a dominant, control-based subsystem in modern jiu-jitsu. Danaher then broadens out to mixed martial arts, outlining his systems approach to MMA skill areas, his work with Georges St-Pierre, and how he structures training camps around tactics rather than short-term physical transformation. Throughout, he analyzes top fighters like Demetrious Johnson, Khabib Nurmagomedov, Conor McGregor, and Yoel Romero, using them to illustrate principles of control, pace, direction, and strategic evolution in combat sports.

John Danaher Dissects Jiu-Jitsu Systems, Leg Locks, MMA and Greatness

John Danaher traces his journey from philosophy PhD and nightclub bouncer to becoming one of jiu-jitsu’s most influential coaches, explaining how grappling revolutionized his understanding of real fighting. He details how a single sentence from Dean Lister led him to systematically rethink leg locks, turning a taboo, low-status tactic into a dominant, control-based subsystem in modern jiu-jitsu. Danaher then broadens out to mixed martial arts, outlining his systems approach to MMA skill areas, his work with Georges St-Pierre, and how he structures training camps around tactics rather than short-term physical transformation. Throughout, he analyzes top fighters like Demetrious Johnson, Khabib Nurmagomedov, Conor McGregor, and Yoel Romero, using them to illustrate principles of control, pace, direction, and strategic evolution in combat sports.

Key Takeaways

Treat jiu-jitsu and MMA as systems, not collections of moves.

Danaher emphasizes breaking fighting down into clear steps and subsystems (e. ...

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

Prioritize control before submission—especially in leg locks.

He distinguishes sharply between the mechanism of control (ashi garami, wedges, inside position) and the mechanism of breaking (heel hook, toe hold); if you can immobilize the opponent’s hips and both legs, you can finish ‘at will’ instead of chasing fast, low-control taps.

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

Reframe ‘taboo’ techniques by challenging their underlying logic.

Leg locks were dismissed as dangerous, ineffective, and ‘positionally unsound,’ but Danaher shows those arguments are either contradictory or equally applicable to accepted techniques; the real issue was that leg locks didn’t fit the traditional top-position system, so he built a new one where they did.

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

Exploit directionality and dilemmas to open submissions.

Traditional BJJ moves from legs to head; adding leg locks makes it bi-directional (head-to-legs and legs-to-head), allowing you to play constant dilemmas—threaten the upper body to expose the legs and vice versa, or jab to draw reactions into takedowns (as with GSP).

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

Structure fight camps around problem-solving, not radical physical change.

In 6–8 weeks you can’t transform VO2 max or vertical jump dramatically, but you can change fight outcomes by sharpening tactics, setups, and specific skills targeted at one opponent’s tendencies, which is how Danaher approaches preparation for title fights.

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

Recognize the three pillars of winning fights: setups, pace, and direction.

Danaher argues dominant fighters consistently control (1) the setups to meaningful exchanges, (2) the pace of the fight, and (3) the direction (standing vs. ...

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

Injury and physical limits can be catalysts for technical innovation.

Severe knee and hip damage limited Danaher’s own athleticism and forced him to rely on deep analysis, precise control mechanics, and verbal/positional teaching, ultimately driving the detailed systems that made his students elite leg lockers and grapplers.

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

Notable Quotes

“Why would you ignore 50% of the human body?”

Dean Lister, as recalled by John Danaher

“If you give a man a point of view, you can change him.”

John Danaher

“The man whose feet dominate the inside position will always dominate the ashi garami game.”

John Danaher

“Jiu-jitsu is a systems-based approach to fighting.”

John Danaher

“You show me a fighter who can dominate the setups, dominate the pace, and dominate the direction, and I’ll show you a fighter who can win 95% of the fights he gets into.”

John Danaher

Questions Answered in This Episode

How can recreational grapplers practically incorporate Danaher’s ‘control before submission’ and ‘double trouble’ principles into everyday training without significantly increasing injury risk?

John Danaher traces his journey from philosophy PhD and nightclub bouncer to becoming one of jiu-jitsu’s most influential coaches, explaining how grappling revolutionized his understanding of real fighting. ...

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

What would a fully developed, modern leg-lock curriculum look like for a traditional gi school that has historically avoided heel hooks and ashi garami?

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

How might Danaher’s idea of integrated subsystems in jiu-jitsu translate to designing training systems in non-combat fields like business, software, or education?

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

Given his criteria of setups, pace, and direction, how would Danaher predict and break down a future Khabib vs. McGregor-style matchup in technical detail?

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

To what extent can Danaher’s emphasis on tactical, opponent-specific preparation in fight camps be reconciled with strength-and-conditioning programs that claim camp time should be mostly physical?

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

Transcript Preview

Joe Rogan

And we're live. John Danaher, thank you very much, sir. Very nice to see you.

John Danaher

It's my pleasure, Joe. Thank you for having me here.

Joe Rogan

Uh, nice to be with a fellow fanny pack proponent as well. And, uh, now you, you have one of the, the beautiful Higher Primate leather bags. I like that, huh?

John Danaher

Joe Rogan has just given me one of the most beautiful fanny packs that I've ever seen in my life. Um, I, I wear a very cheap fanny pack and this, this is a thing of beauty. I was just telling Joe about, uh, my student, Gordon Ryan, was recently given a Gucci fanny pack.

Joe Rogan

(laughs)

John Danaher

It's literally the most beautiful thing I've ever seen in my life. When he wears it around me, I get insanely jealous. And-

Joe Rogan

But would you buy one of those?

John Danaher

No.

Joe Rogan

It's like a $800 fanny pack.

John Danaher

Just on, just on principle, just on principle, I can't buy an $800 fanny pack. But I could definitely stab Gordon Ryan in the back with a knife and steal it from him-

Joe Rogan

Wow.

John Danaher

... and blame it on Nicky Ryan. I could do that easily.

Joe Rogan

Blame it on his brother?

John Danaher

Absolutely.

Joe Rogan

Wow.

John Danaher

Make a great TV series.

Joe Rogan

(laughs) The fanny pack is making a comeback. It's a slow comeback that a lot of people are reluctant to join. They're, they're scared. They, they worry about their position in the sexual food chain.

John Danaher

(laughs)

Joe Rogan

And-

John Danaher

With, with good reason, by the way.

Joe Rogan

I don't know why. I feel like anybody that won't fuck you 'cause you have a fanny pack, you don't wanna fuck them. They're too much work.

John Danaher

Strong point. Strong point.

Joe Rogan

Yeah, it's just not worth it.

John Danaher

Essentially it's always a battle of, uh, appearance versus function.

Joe Rogan

Yeah.

John Danaher

Um, fanny packs score very, very low on appearance, but very high on function.

Joe Rogan

I feel like that one bucks the trend.

John Danaher

I think (laughs) you're right.

Joe Rogan

Uh-

John Danaher

Between this and the Gucci, we've got something going on here.

Joe Rogan

There's a video that I put up the other day of my, uh, archery game, this techno hunt thing, which is this big crazy elaborate thing. I got more comments on the fact that I was wearing a fanny pack in the video than anything.

John Danaher

Were they positive or negative comments?

Joe Rogan

Mostly negative.

John Danaher

Yeah.

Joe Rogan

(laughs)

John Danaher

'Cause it's my experience. (laughs) But that's just the internet. The, the internet is- The internet is extremely angry. That's the first thing you learn about the internet. They ... You can, you could literally save a baby's life i- i- i- from ... And 80% of the internet will, will call you an asshole for doing so. It's, uh, it doesn't matter what you do, the internet is very angry.

Install uListen to search the full transcript and get AI-powered insights

Get Full Transcript

Get more from every podcast

AI summaries, searchable transcripts, and fact-checking. Free forever.

Add to Chrome