
The 5 Most Effective Techniques To Hack Your Habits - Spencer Greenburg
Chris Williamson (host), Spencer Greenberg (guest), Narrator
In this episode of Modern Wisdom, featuring Chris Williamson and Spencer Greenberg, The 5 Most Effective Techniques To Hack Your Habits - Spencer Greenburg explores big Five Beats Myers-Briggs, Plus Five Research-Backed Habit Hacks Revealed Spencer Greenberg discusses his new research comparing popular personality frameworks, finding the Big Five model predicts real-life outcomes roughly twice as well as Myers-Briggs and infinitely better than astrology, despite people liking Myers-Briggs descriptions more. He explains why dichotomizing traits (e.g., “ENTJ”) and flattering language make Myers-Briggs feel accurate but reduce its scientific usefulness, while Big Five and HEXACO arise from empirical clustering of trait adjectives. The conversation then shifts to two large habit-formation studies that tested 22 techniques, identifying five simple, high-impact methods (like habit reflection, mini-habits, and social support) that reliably improve habit success. Finally, Spencer outlines his personal philosophy “valuism” and multiple complementary definitions of wisdom, emphasizing aligning intrinsic values, beliefs, and actions while effectively shaping outcomes.
Big Five Beats Myers-Briggs, Plus Five Research-Backed Habit Hacks Revealed
Spencer Greenberg discusses his new research comparing popular personality frameworks, finding the Big Five model predicts real-life outcomes roughly twice as well as Myers-Briggs and infinitely better than astrology, despite people liking Myers-Briggs descriptions more. He explains why dichotomizing traits (e.g., “ENTJ”) and flattering language make Myers-Briggs feel accurate but reduce its scientific usefulness, while Big Five and HEXACO arise from empirical clustering of trait adjectives. The conversation then shifts to two large habit-formation studies that tested 22 techniques, identifying five simple, high-impact methods (like habit reflection, mini-habits, and social support) that reliably improve habit success. Finally, Spencer outlines his personal philosophy “valuism” and multiple complementary definitions of wisdom, emphasizing aligning intrinsic values, beliefs, and actions while effectively shaping outcomes.
Key Takeaways
Rely on Big Five over Myers-Briggs for real-life prediction.
Spencer’s study of 42 life outcomes found zodiac signs had zero predictive power, a Jungian/Myers-Briggs-style test correlated at about 0. ...
Get the full analysis with uListen AI
Avoid dichotomizing personality traits; treat them as continuous.
Most traits follow a bell curve, so cutting at a midpoint (“you’re an introvert or extrovert”) lumps moderates with extremes and makes scores unstable—Spencer showed turning MBTI-style scores into hard types drops prediction from ~0. ...
Get the full analysis with uListen AI
Choose habits you’re genuinely motivated to form.
Across Spencer’s large habit study, initial motivation was one of the strongest predictors of long-term success, more than most techniques. ...
Get the full analysis with uListen AI
Use the five validated habit techniques as a ‘stack.’
The best performers were: (1) habit reflection (analyze a past successful habit and apply lessons), (2) home reminders (notes or physical cues placed where you’ll see them), (3) mini-habits (a trivially small fallback version like 10 push-ups), (4) support of a friend (explicitly enlist someone to help), and (5) listing habit benefits (write and revisit why the habit matters). ...
Get the full analysis with uListen AI
Distinguish intrinsic from instrumental values to avoid chasing empty goals.
Intrinsic values are things you care about for their own sake (e. ...
Get the full analysis with uListen AI
Use values and principles as a layered decision framework.
Spencer suggests a stack: intrinsic values at the base, then goals and plans that serve those values, then decision principles as heuristics (e. ...
Get the full analysis with uListen AI
Blend intuition with analysis using the FIRE framework.
Trust your gut primarily for Fast, Irrelevant, Repetitious, and Evolutionary decisions (FIRE), like reflexive driving maneuvers or sensing rotten food. ...
Get the full analysis with uListen AI
Notable Quotes
“Myers-Briggs ended up exactly halfway between astrology and the Big Five.”
— Spencer Greenberg
“The bigger problem isn’t doing a small version of the habit; it’s not doing the habit at all.”
— Spencer Greenberg
“A lot of people waste time chasing things they only instrumentally value, and forget they don’t intrinsically value them.”
— Spencer Greenberg
“Wisdom is knowledge multiplied by goodness.”
— Spencer Greenberg
“You have these two incredibly powerful tools—analysis and intuition—and some people are saying, ‘Just leave one in the toolbox.’”
— Spencer Greenberg
Questions Answered in This Episode
If Big Five is clearly more predictive, how could its communication be redesigned to be as intuitive and emotionally satisfying as Myers-Briggs types?
Spencer Greenberg discusses his new research comparing popular personality frameworks, finding the Big Five model predicts real-life outcomes roughly twice as well as Myers-Briggs and infinitely better than astrology, despite people liking Myers-Briggs descriptions more. ...
Get the full analysis with uListen AI
Given that many habit techniques failed in Spencer’s study, which popular self-help practices might be overrated or even counterproductive?
Get the full analysis with uListen AI
How can someone practically audit their life to identify where they’re living by other people’s values instead of their own intrinsic ones?
Get the full analysis with uListen AI
Which of Spencer’s six definitions of wisdom feels most useful to apply day-to-day, and how could you deliberately cultivate it?
Get the full analysis with uListen AI
In situations where your intuition and rational analysis conflict, what concrete process could you use to reconcile them without ignoring either?
Get the full analysis with uListen AI
Transcript Preview
How useful are personality tests, in your opinion?
Ah, that is a great question. So we've just run a really big study on this that I'm super excited about. In fact, you're, this is the first time ever talking about it, so v- hot off the presses. Um, so the most popular personality test in the world seems to be the Myers-Briggs test, but the Myers-Briggs test, also called the MBTI, is a commercial test, right? So it's hard to study because it's, you know, it's owned by a company and so on. So what we did is we took the public information about the constructs that have been, you know, known, about what it's trying to measure, and we've designed our own test designed to measure those same constructs. I'll just call it a Jungian test 'cause it's, you know, it's not exactly precisely the same as the commercial one, but it's designed to measure similar ideas. And then, we actually put it to the test. And so way, the way that we did this is we also developed, uh, what's called a Big Five test. Are you familiar with the Big Five Personality Model?
Yes.
So the, so these are, so th- it's interesting because the Big Five Personality Model is the one used by academics. It's the one they call the gold standard, whereas the Myers-Briggs is the one that's, like, super popular for the laypeople, and often, you know, academics kinda poo-poo it and say, "Oh, that's not so great," right? And so it's, so we wanted to put them against each other, and so the way we did this is we took a whole bunch of facts about a person's life. It was about 42 different facts, so everything from how satisfied they are with their life to how many friends they have, you know, to things like, you know, have they been arrested and so on. And then, we had them take both of these tests, our Big Five test, gold standard academic one, and, uh, and this, uh, Jungian test designed after the Myers-Briggs and said, "Well, how well can each test predict what's true about people's lives as a measure of how good they are?" So do you wanna guess what happened when we did this? And I'll just, before I have you guess, I'll just throw in one third thing. We also used astrological sun signs as a control group. So we took people, you know, zodiac sign, are you a Pisces or an Aries or whatever, and that was our, our kind of control. So we tried to predict-
(laughs)
... things about your life using that, uh, using this Jungian idea, and then using the Big Five.
Why did you need the astrology thing?
Oh, it's a good way to calibrate, uh, the statistics of our system to see if we... (laughs) Uh, if, uh, if, uh, eh, whether we can, uh, predict with astrology, right?
Install uListen to search the full transcript and get AI-powered insights
Get Full TranscriptGet more from every podcast
AI summaries, searchable transcripts, and fact-checking. Free forever.
Add to Chrome