Skip to content
The Twenty Minute VCThe Twenty Minute VC

DEBATE: State of Seed Investing w/ Jason Lemkin, Sam Lessin, Frank Rotman & Harry Stebbings | E1047

Sam Lessin is a Co-Founder and Partner @ Slow Ventures with a portfolio including the likes of Airtable, Robinhood, Slack, Solana, PillPack and many more unicorn companies. Prior to Slow, Sam was a VP Product at Facebook having sold his company to Meta. Frank Rotman is a founding partner of QED Investors, one of the leading fintech-focused venture firms investing today with a portfolio including the likes of Klarna, Kavak, Quinto Andar, Credit Karma and more. As for Frank, prior to QED, Frank was one of the earliest analysts hired into Capital One and spent almost 13 years there helping build many of the company’s business units and operational areas. Jason Lemkin is the Founder @ SaaStr one of the best-performing early-stage venture funds focused on SaaS. In the past, Jason has led investments in Algolia, Pipedrive, Salesloft, TalkDesk, and RevenueCat to name a few. Prior to SaaStr, Jason was an entrepreneur, selling EchoSign to Adobe for $100M where it is now a $250M ARR product. ------------------------------------------------------------ Timestamps: (0:00) Intro (00:31) Perspectives on Investing (10:40) Risks and Insights in Early-stage Investing (19:53) Strategy and Scalability (36:22) Investment Approaches, Hiring, and Predictions (57:14) Final Insights and Quick-Fire Round ------------------------------------------------------------ In Today’s Discussion on Why Seed is Broken We Discuss: 1. The Seed Model Was Broken and What Comes Now: Why does Sam Lessin believe the model for seed of a “factory line” was broken? What does he believe will replace it? Why does Jason Lemkin argue that this might not be the case for SaaS and enterprise? 2. Round Construction: YC, Multi-Stage Funds and Party Rounds: Why does Sam Lessin believe we have seen the end of party rounds? Why does Jason Lemkin disagree and we will see more than ever? Why does Sam Lessin believe the factory model of YC churning out companies is over? Where does Jason Lemkin believe the value lies in the YC model? Will the multi-stage funds remain in seed? How has their entrance and deployment changed the seed market? 3. VC Value Add at Seed: Is it BS? Why does Jason believe all talent arms in venture firms have failed? Why does Sam believe that no VCs provide value? Do the best founders really need help? Why do Jason and Sam disagree? 4. What Happens Now: Why does Jason believe that every manager can write off their fund from 2021? Who will be the winners in seed in the next 10 years? Why does Sam believe if you want to bet on AI, just bet on Meta or Microsoft? What will happen to the many companies with no PMF but 10 years of runway? ------------------------------------------------------------ Subscribe on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/3j2KMcZTtgTNBKwtZBMHvl?si=85bc9196860e4466 Subscribe on Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-twenty-minute-vc-20vc-venture-capital-startup/id958230465 Follow Harry Stebbings on Twitter: https://twitter.com/HarryStebbings Follow Jason Lemkin on Twitter: https://twitter.com/jasonlk Follow Sam Lessin on Twitter: https://twitter.com/lessin Follow Frank Rotman on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FintechJunkie Follow 20VC on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/20vc_reels Follow 20VC on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@20vc_tok Visit our Website: https://www.20vc.com Subscribe to our Newsletter: https://www.thetwentyminutevc.com/contact ------------------------------------------------------------ #JasonLemkin #SamLessin #FrankRotman #HarryStebbings

Sam LessinguestHarry StebbingshostJason LemkinguestFrank Rotmanguest
Aug 10, 20231h 3mWatch on YouTube ↗

At a glance

WHAT IT’S REALLY ABOUT

Seed Investing’s Factory Era Is Over: Back To Bespoke, Brutal Reality

  1. The guests argue that the “factory line” era of seed investing—standardized playbooks, predictable Series A/B markups, and manufacturing middling unicorns—is dead and unlikely to return. Seed now reverts to a bespoke, power‑law game where weird, non‑obvious bets, smaller funds, and true conviction matter more than process and branding. They stress capital efficiency, real de‑risking, and building good, profitable companies first, instead of raising endlessly on narrative and TAM slides. The conversation also covers overpricing at seed, LP pullbacks, crowded cap tables, YC and party rounds, founder attitudes to capital, and when a real IPO window might reopen.

IDEAS WORTH REMEMBERING

5 ideas

The industrial, “factory line” model of seed—optimizing companies for predictable Series A/B handoffs—is effectively over.

Cheap capital, AWS, and standardized playbooks once allowed funds to package startups to hit clear metrics, pass them down the stack, and reliably IPO middling companies; that pipeline collapsed when many of those companies got crushed in the public markets.

Seed must re-center on weird, non‑obvious, cheap bets where most investors aren’t bidding.

The biggest returns in their portfolios came from hard‑to‑package, off‑theme deals (e.g., Solana, Teamshares) where conviction was high and pricing was low precisely because the factory and consensus funds didn’t want them.

Capital efficiency and learning per dollar invested are once again critical.

Investors emphasize de‑risking specific theses cheaply, generating real proof (or anti‑proof) before scaling; companies that consume large amounts of capital without validating the model almost guarantee poor returns, even if revenue grows.

Overpriced seed rounds create a “no‑bid” risk at Series A and beyond.

If a startup raises at a high seed valuation and doesn’t go “far enough, fast enough,” later investors will quietly pass rather than force flat/down rounds, shrinking the funnel for follow‑on capital even if the business is okay on paper.

Owning meaningful stakes matters more than ever; tiny slices in crowded cap tables don’t move the fund needle.

Classic seed wins like The Trade Desk worked because small funds bought ~20% early; with YC‑style party rounds and 40–50 investors on the cap table, it’s almost impossible for a seed fund to get to double‑digit ownership and turn a 1,000x company into a meaningful fund outcome.

WORDS WORTH SAVING

5 quotes

“My view when I say that seed is dead is that I think the factory model of seed which supported massive scaling of it is dead.”

Sam Lessin

“Great companies are built on top of good companies. You have to get to good first, and then you can eventually get to great.”

Frank Rotman

“The most depressing thing in the world is not being wrong, it’s being right and not making money.”

Sam Lessin

“If pricing doesn’t correct at the earliest stage, you’re going to have a lot of no bids at the Series A because they haven’t earned their way into a significant increase in valuation.”

Frank Rotman

“No one gives a shit about a company that does $200 million top line and grows with 30% margins. Right? No one cares.”

Sam Lessin

Death of the “factory model” of seed investing and return to bespoke, thesis-driven betsCapital efficiency, de‑risking stages, and the real mortality rates between Seed, Series A, and BSeed pricing distortion, overfunding, and the downstream impact on Series A and beyondRole and limits of YC, accelerators, and party rounds versus concentrated ownershipFounder mindset shifts: respect for capital, optionality vs. swinging only for mega‑outcomesFund size, LP behavior, and why mega seed/multi‑stage funds are under pressureIPO market outlook and the value (or lack) of $200M‑revenue “good” public companies

High quality AI-generated summary created from speaker-labeled transcript.

Get more out of YouTube videos.

High quality summaries for YouTube videos. Accurate transcripts to search & find moments. Powered by ChatGPT & Claude AI.

Add to Chrome