By playing, you agree to uListen's Terms and Privacy Policy and YouTube's Terms of Service.
Summaries, chapters, transcripts, and FAQs on this page are made by uListen, not YouTube.
CHAPTERS
- 0:00 – 4:26
Why Adam Neumann stepped back into the arena
David Ulevitch asks Adam Neumann why he chose to build again after leaving WeWork. Adam describes reflecting on lessons, running a family office, and buying about four thousand apartments in multifamily during COVID.
- •Adam took time after stepping down to reflect on successes and mistakes
- •His family office made venture, private equity, and liquid market investments, each teaching him something new
- •In March 2020 the family office went deep into multifamily, buying roughly four thousand apartments
- •Walking the buildings convinced him the residential experience was not what it should be
- 4:26 – 9:06
Marc Andreessen's call and partnering with a16z
Adam recounts a first phone call from Marc Andreessen, who told him venture is hand-to-hand combat and that the question was when, not whether, he'd get back in the game. He then describes presenting to the a16z team, the diligence process, and why he chose them as partners.
- •Marc told Adam that getting punched is part of the game and that for every mistake there were a hundred things done right
- •Adam called the call meaningful and told his wife about it right away
- •The a16z team felt like entrepreneurs rather than typical investors
- •After the first board meeting Marc called with candid feedback, which Adam welcomed
- 9:06 – 14:47
Why housing matters and the superstar city problem
David asks Marc why housing is relevant to American dynamism. Marc argues housing, healthcare, and education are the biggest spending categories where tech has had the least impact, and explains how agglomeration effects produced superstar cities that stopped building housing.
- •Housing, healthcare, and education are rising fastest in cost and are the sectors tech has touched least
- •Housing has big economic, social, and political consequences tied to commitment to a place
- •Cities create an agglomeration effect that makes productive people more productive
- •Superstar cities restrict new building, creating a bifurcated housing market
- 14:47 – 17:34
COVID as a system shock and a five-year window
Marc describes how COVID forced companies online and proved they could operate remotely. He says this opens a chance to rethink how companies, geography, and living are organized, within roughly a five-year window.
- •COVID forced an instant hard cutover online without any big company stopping operations
- •Every CEO and investor began rethinking how companies, industries, and cities are organized
- •Remote work gives access to thousands of jobs and changes whether ambitious kids must leave home
- •Marc says the assumptions behind housing and work are up for grabs and a five-year window exists
- 17:34 – 20:35
Lessons from WeWork and the renter economy
David asks what Adam is carrying from WeWork into Flow. Adam says flexible work is more relevant now, the home has become the most important place, and the renter-heavy, equity-poor housing market is a major problem.
- •Adam says flexible work is a better idea today than it was ten years ago
- •He argues the home turned out to be the most important place and you can take work home but not home to work
- •Seventy percent of people thirty-five and younger rent, and housing is about a third of their spending
- •People are increasingly working where they live rather than living where they work
- 20:35 – 27:09
The corporate campus, lost community, and apartment living
Marc explains how the college campus and corporate campus models gave young adults community, and how COVID detonated that. Adam adds that serendipity belongs in the home and that residential buildings have lacked innovation because landlords never needed it.
- •Marc describes the path from college campus to corporate campus as a perk-filled, community-rich environment
- •COVID left many young people alone in a studio apartment with a laptop
- •Adam says amenity-filled buildings are often empty and human connection doesn't thrive there
- •Adam says landlords had no incentive to improve because supply is short, and point-solution proptech struggles, so he favors a vertical approach
- 27:09 – 29:52
Neighbors and community across cultures
A lighter exchange in which Adam contrasts American norms with Israel, where neighbors share freely. He and the others joke about salt, police response times, and greeting people in elevators.
- •David observes COVID was the first time many people got to know their neighbors
- •Adam says not knowing neighbors is an American thing, unlike where he grew up in Israel
- •He tells a story about taking salt from a neighbor's home
- •Adam finds it odd that people don't talk in elevators
- 29:52 – 37:22
Moving a16z's headquarters to the cloud
David asks Marc about a16z's move to a remote-centric model. Marc explains the firm's earlier single-office approach, the employee polls during COVID, the shift to hoteling and smaller offices, and his view that most companies are in an unsatisfying hybrid state.
- •a16z deliberately kept a single Menlo Park office from 2009 for the beehive effect
- •Employee polls shifted over time, with young parents especially unwilling to return to long commutes
- •The firm now runs remotely with formal meetings on Zoom, teams free to cluster, more offsites, and more travel
- •Marc says most big companies are in a hybrid state that isn't working well, and expects a ten-year process
- 37:22 – 41:18
Office serendipity and the case for face-to-face
David says offsites make time together more productive, and Marc says he disliked watercooler moments. Adam pushes back, arguing late-night serendipitous moments can't happen on Zoom and that companies who prioritize face-to-face time will win.
- •David says concentrated offsite time beats superficial hallway chats
- •Marc calls his view a barbell and says he hated watercooler small talk
- •Adam argues breakthrough moments happen in person and not on Zoom
- •Adam suggests bringing those connections into the home and a hybrid of home and office space
- 41:18 – 44:06
Flow's vision: elevated experience and shared value
David asks Adam about Flow's vision. Adam explains the goal of elevating the resident experience and sharing a portion of the value residents create, grounding it in the shrinking path to equity for renters.
- •Adam says talk is cheap and the team wants to build rather than speak
- •Flow aims to elevate the resident experience, for example using one app instead of nine
- •It aims to share a portion of created value with residents
- •Adam says home equity is the main source of wealth for most Americans, so long-term renters need another path
- 44:06 – 47:39
Flow's four pillars and the flywheel
Adam lays out Flow's four pillars: a tech-first management company, real estate asset management, financial services, and a value-sharing mechanism. He describes how they form a flywheel and quantifies the effect of lower churn on NOI.
- •The pillars are branded management, asset management, financial services, and sharing value with residents
- •Adam says he and a16z contributed equally to the business, emphasizing alignment
- •Better experience raises NOI, which funds more buildings, users, and financial services
- •Cutting churn from 50% to 40% would raise NOI about 5%, or about 500 basis points of returns
- 47:39 – 53:01
Cities as startups, government's role, and closing thoughts
In the closing question, the host asks about model cities and government's role. Marc covers planned communities like Epcot, Irvine, and Venice; Adam discusses how hard it is to reimagine built cities, new construction tech, partnerships with government, and the five-year window.
- •Marc says cities were once startups and examples include Disney's Epcot vision, Irvine, and Venice
- •Entrenched local homeowners often block new housing in successful cities
- •Adam says reimagining an already-built city is hard and mentions new-city efforts in Saudi Arabia
- •Adam points to construction technology and converting dead offices as possible paths, and favors partnership with government
- •He calls the housing crisis one of the biggest US challenges and agrees with the five-year window
