Skip to content
Nikhil KamathNikhil Kamath

Howard Marks: AI, Debt vs Equity & The Next 40 Years Of Investing | Nikhil Kamath | WTF is Finance?

I sat down with Howard Marks, the co-founder of Oaktree and the man who has been writing the memos every serious investor on earth opens first for over thirty years, and what was supposed to be a conversation about debt and cycles became a conversation about how anyone gets above-average at anything in a world where everyone smart is already trying — we covered why he picked bonds over stocks for an entire career and got rich doing the opposite of what everyone wanted to do, why the S&P returns 10% a year but almost never between 8 and 12, why he changed his mind on AI after a single conversation with Claude, what AI can't do that great investors still can, why he thinks India's biggest export business sits in the crosshairs of AI, and where the $10 bill nobody has picked up is hiding right now. 00:00 Introduction 02:05 From Queens to Wharton beginnings 08:10 Mujo and independence of events 15:17 Why cycles exist in markets 22:09 Pandemic, recessions, and recovery age 28:38 Where we are today 36:08 Drifting versus seeing the river 42:57 Oak Tree and accidental entrepreneurship 49:45 Why bonds over equities 57:14 Distressed bonds and excess returns 1:05:36 Beginning a new career today 1:12:42 Active management versus indexation 1:20:08 Learning from Andrew, second level thinking 1:27:25 How to become contrarian and better 1:34:28 Learning from history, final advice #NikhilKamath Co-founder of Zerodha and Gruhas Host of 'WTF is' & 'People By WTF' Podcast Twitter: https://x.com/nikhilkamathcio/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/nikhilkamathcio/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/nikhilkamathcio/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/nikhilkamathcio/ #HowardMarks Co-founder and co-chairman of Oaktree Capital Management LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/howardmarksbook/ Twitter: https://x.com/HowardMarksBook Watch 'WTF is' Podcast on Spotify https://tinyurl.com/4nsm4ezn Watch 'People by WTF' Podcast on Spotify https://tinyurl.com/yme92c59 Watch 'WTF Online' on Spotify https://tinyurl.com/4tjua4th #WTFiswithnikhilkamath #PeopleByWTF #WTFOnline

Nikhil KamathhostHoward Marksguest
May 4, 20261h 43mWatch on YouTube ↗

EVERY SPOKEN WORD

  1. 0:00 – 2:05

    Introduction

    1. SP

      [upbeat music] [water drops] [pen writes] [dramatic music]

    2. NK

      Could you also say that indexation and ETFs have taken over because the markets have been in an uptrend?

    3. HM

      My answer is that indexation has taken over as it has, not because it's so good, but because active management was so bad.

    4. NK

      'Cause a lot of the distressed bonds that you are in, is the chance of a downside zero? So I'll give you a little bit of a background. So most of these are, like, conversations. I-

    5. HM

      Most of-

    6. NK

      The interviews that we do are conversations. They're fairly free-flowing, and the audience we cater to are entrepreneurs of Indian origin-

    7. HM

      Mm

    8. NK

      ... who are around the age of 25 to 30.

    9. HM

      Mm-hmm.

    10. NK

      Everyone's looking to invest in the market, trade the market, start a business, building something from the bottom up.

    11. HM

      Right.

    12. NK

      So we are speaking to them. So most of today is around that.

  2. 2:05 – 8:10

    From Queens to Wharton beginnings

    1. NK

      Can we start with a little bit about you and, uh-

    2. HM

      Yeah

    3. NK

      ... how your own journey began from Queens to Wall Street? Maybe like a, how do you describe your story in your words? Your story, your origin story.

    4. HM

      Well, um, you know, I was born in Queens, New York, as you know.

    5. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    6. HM

      One of the, w- one of what are called the outer boroughs. Uh, middle-class upbringing.

    7. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    8. HM

      Uh, neither parent, uh, went to college. Um, but my father was a very intelligent man and, and, and an accountant.

    9. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    10. HM

      And I think he did his job well, and so we lived a, uh, comfortable middle-class, uh, existence.

    11. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    12. HM

      Um, I went to the public schools of New York at a time when you could get a good education in the public schools of New York, uh, and I think I got one. Uh, and, uh, oddly enough, uh, uh, ended up taking courses in business law and then accounting-

    13. NK

      Mm-hmm

    14. HM

      ... in high school.

    15. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    16. HM

      And, uh, really connected with accounting-

    17. NK

      Mm-hmm

    18. HM

      ... with the orderliness and the symmetry. Uh, it, it, it just clicked for me. So I decided to go to, uh, a business school. I applied to Wharton as the best business school for undergraduates in America. Uh, I was told I wouldn't get in, but I did. Uh, went to Wharton as an accounting student, switched my major to finance.

    19. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    20. HM

      Uh, uh, then went on to get a, an MBA, uh, in, in accounting from the University of Chicago Business School. Uh, [clears throat] and, uh, between years of business school, I had a job in the investment research department of Citibank. Liked it, went back.

    21. NK

      Hmm.

    22. HM

      That, that's my, that's my background.

    23. NK

      Is Wharton, would you s- say, still one of the better schools?

    24. HM

      No, I think it... I, I, I, I have no reason to believe it's not still the best undergraduate business school. There are other good graduate schools-

    25. NK

      Mm-hmm

    26. HM

      ... uh, that are, uh, uh, very competitive with Wharton. Um, uh, I, I'm not, I'm no expert. I'm gonna say that 100 times on this tape.

    27. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    28. HM

      Uh, but, uh, I believe that Wharton is still the best undergraduate business school.

    29. NK

      And you studied Japanese literature at Wharton?

    30. HM

      Yes. Uh, when I went to Wharton, uh, there were two very enlightened requirements.

  3. 8:10 – 15:17

    Mujo and independence of events

    1. NK

      the sixth day.

    2. HM

      Well, I mean-

    3. NK

      Do you believe in game theory?

    4. HM

      And whether that may not be precisely true, but, uh, uh, but I'm a big believer in, in the independence of events, and I think that that's what Mujo is about-

    5. NK

      Mm-hmm

    6. HM

      ... independence of events. So, you know, if you flip ten q-- uh, a coin ten times, better example coin than rain-

    7. NK

      Mm-hmm, mm-hmm

    8. HM

      ... 'cause rain there are some physical properties at work, but, uh, if you flip a coin ten times and you get ten heads, the probability of heads on the eleventh flip is still fifty-fifty, 'cause the, 'cause the trials are independent.

    9. NK

      Do you believe in game theory?

    10. HM

      In?

    11. NK

      Game theory.

    12. HM

      Uh, w- well, I believe that, uh, I believe that, uh, it, you can strategize-

    13. NK

      Hmm

    14. HM

      ... and you can, uh, figure out, uh, which action has the highest expected payoff-

    15. NK

      Mm-hmm

    16. HM

      ... or the highest maximum potential payoff-

    17. NK

      Mm-hmm

    18. HM

      ... or the least probability of a really bad payoff.

    19. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    20. HM

      And you can perhaps even strategize about what your, uh, opponent is gonna do.

    21. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    22. HM

      I, so I, I believe in strategy. I don't know if that's exactly the same as game theory-

    23. NK

      Mm-hmm

    24. HM

      ... but I, I think, um, I think that, you know, uh, I, a-as I've suggested in my comments so far, what I really don't believe in is predictions. And, uh, I believe that, uh, uh, given human nature and the, uh, dislike for ambiguity, uh, people pursue, uh, predictions so that they can understand what world they're gonna be operating in and, and deal with it accordingly. Uh, and if they do this to excess, then they theorize about a world, uh, they'll be operating in, uh, which is not as likely to obtain as they think, which means that their predictions can be misleading.

    25. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    26. HM

      And, um, about twenty-odd years ago, I wrote a memo called You Can Predict... You Can't Predict, You Can Prepare, and that's really the essence. And that, that, you can tell that that comes directly from the understanding of Mujo. Um, we can't predict the future. We can't control the future. But we can prepare for the future. Now, that raises an interesting contradiction in terms. If you can't predict what the future will be, how can you prepare for it? And the answer is you can prepare for a future which is unpredictable. So you can, uh, in investing, you can put together a portfolio rather than one that will produce maximum success if a certain future unfolds. You can put together a portfolio which will do fine if several, any of several futures unfold, and not too terribly if a bunch of other futures unfold. Now, you can't prepare simultaneously for the, uh, positive tail and the negative tail.

    27. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    28. HM

      If you, if you prepare for a, a total disaster, then you're unprepared for a great future. If you prepare for enormous success, and you're gonna maximize your, uh, outcome should this success unfold, then you're probably un, totally unprepared for a very negative But i- you can prepare if you, i- if you, uh, sub-optimize for a number of possible outcomes in the middle of the probability distribution.

    29. NK

      Isn't that a bit contrarian to the coin example? You said if you toss a coin and it comes heads 10 times-

    30. HM

      Yes

  4. 15:17 – 22:09

    Why cycles exist in markets

    1. HM

      In other words, I wrote a book about, uh, cycles-

    2. NK

      Mm-hmm

    3. HM

      ... and that's the one where I refer to my experience tr- traveling in India. And, uh, cycles are induced primarily by behavior, by, uh, you know, uh, uh, the upcycle is exaggerating, overgeneralizing. The upcycle, the... There's a trend line, let's say it's GDP growth.

    4. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    5. HM

      There's a trend line. But sometimes, uh, the economy grows more than that. Why? Largely, I think, because of optimism, because, uh, people are optimistic, so they spend a lot of money. Producers are optimistic about demand for their product, so they build new factories and hire labor and buy machinery, and the sum of these things produces a period of above-trend growth.

    6. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    7. HM

      But then, when producers have more than prepared for the coming growth and consumers have been sated by consumption, then the, then things will ease off, and maybe i- it results in a period of below-average growth. So, uh, you know, I, I wrote the book, uh, I was about two-thirds through writing the book, and I've been studying cycles for almost sixty years now, living through cycles. And, uh, I said to myself, "Just why do we have cycles? Why doesn't GDP, if, if the average growth in GDP is two, why isn't it always two? Why, why is it three or four or one or zero or minus one?" Uh, and the answer is excesses and corrections. And then you go to a negative, which is an excess, and then it corrects back to the trend line. So rather than thinking of cycles as, as ups and downs, which I think most people do, think of them as excesses and corrections, excesses and corrections, fluctuations around the trend line. I mean, y- this is most easily seen in, in, in the stock market, for example. You look at the S&P 500. The S&P 500 has returned about ten percent a year on average for the last hundred years.

    8. NK

      But the constituents of the S&P have changed many times in that period.

    9. HM

      Yes, but the, but the average rate of return doesn't change.

    10. NK

      Average rate of return. I don't know about the S&P. I know in India the indices, I'm a stock investor.

    11. HM

      Yes.

    12. NK

      That's my full-time job.

    13. HM

      Yes.

    14. NK

      We have returned about eleven percent over the last couple of decades. But we have depreciation of currency, which is about 4, 5% a year. So I'm assuming the S&P would have returned 6%, if you were to ask me to wager a guess. But I don't think it's a fair benchmark because the companies in the S&P, like the indexes back home, change by virtue of market cap.

    15. HM

      They do. But my point is that the S&P, however constituted, has returned an average of 10% a year for the last hundred years. But, um, not steadily.

    16. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    17. HM

      In the '90s, it returned 20% a year, and in the aughts it returned zero per year. So certainly not steady. And not only is that an interesting phenomenon to think about, but even more so the fact that the return on the S&P, which averages 10, is almost never between 8 and 12.

    18. NK

      Hmm.

    19. HM

      This is a very interesting datum.

    20. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    21. HM

      Uh, uh, why is it that the norm is not the average?

    22. NK

      Greed and fear.

    23. HM

      Excess and correction.

    24. NK

      Do you think-

    25. HM

      Excess of optimism, correction, excess of pex- pessimism.

    26. NK

      Can I ask you a s- a small digression in a question?

    27. HM

      Yes.

    28. NK

      If humans were no longer in the picture-

    29. HM

      Yes

    30. NK

      ... and AI models are trading in the market-

  5. 22:09 – 28:38

    Pandemic, recessions, and recovery age

    1. HM

      uh, when you look at the economy, people think of the age of the recovery. So the rec- the economic recovery is two years older. The, the, the, the bull market in stocks went on another almost two years. So, um, I would, I would say that the, uh, y- you see, it, it, first of all, as to the economy, it's very, very hard to date or talk about the age of this cycle because we had the pandemic-

    2. NK

      Mm-hmm

    3. HM

      ... where we did something unique. We closed the world economy-

    4. NK

      Mm-hmm

    5. HM

      ... to produce the spread, to reduce the spread of the disease.

    6. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    7. HM

      And so that interfered with the normal workings.

    8. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    9. HM

      And it, uh, according to the people who make these decisions, it produced a recession. It was in a very unusual recession because it was only one quarter. I always thought an, a recession was two quarters of negative GDP growth. Uh, and of course it didn't occur for the normal reason of excess optimism leading to a correction. It was man-made.

    10. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    11. HM

      And was readily corrected.

    12. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    13. HM

      So the second quarter of 2020 was the worst quarter in the history of the world, uh, uh, for, for US, for GDP. Uh, and then the third quarter was the best.

    14. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    15. HM

      So was it really a recession in the, in the functional terms of determining cyclicality, uh, or, or just some noise? Uh, and-

    16. NK

      Can I ask another question here? I would say GDP, if I were to consider it the total produce going into the economy-

    17. HM

      Yeah

    18. NK

      ... and consumers consume as much as we can, I could argue that a recession is truly when there is more production in an economy and the consumption is organically lesser. So do you think GDP is a good benchmark to figure out when there is a recession or not? Because the consumers went away then artificially.

    19. HM

      Well, I think it's, I think, um- I think your definition of recession isn't, isn't right because what you said was, uh, there's more production. But that's not-

    20. NK

      Less consumption

    21. HM

      ... less consumption. That is, that's the main element-

    22. NK

      Mm-hmm

    23. HM

      ... of, of, uh, of a recession, in my opinion. Uh, uh, manufacturers are always happy to produce goods to meet demand. Uh, the recession, it means primarily a reduction of demand so that, uh, uh, uh, which, which, uh, discourages manufacturers from producing, and the reduced production is really what causes the recession. Fewer people are, are at work, uh, et cetera. Fewer goods are produced and consumed.

    24. NK

      So in the pa- pandemic, production went down, but the demand for consumption did not actually go down, but just that the markets were shut for a period of time. 'Cause when they opened, people really consumed.

    25. HM

      Well, I mean, yes, the, the underlying demand didn't go down, but people, I mean, uh, in the sense that people would have liked to have parties-

    26. NK

      Mm-hmm

    27. HM

      ... they just weren't allowed to have parties. So the demand, the, the psychological demand for a party was there, but the economic demand for rental halls and bands and food and, uh, party dresses and things like that, uh, didn't exist. Uh, so that's, that, so, but this is why I say that the GDP was kind of artificially depressed, uh, by a decision of government-

    28. NK

      Mm-hmm

    29. HM

      ... really. So, so when we say that, well, how old is this recovery? Was that a real recession? If that was a recession, then this recovery is now six years old. If that wasn't a recession-

    30. NK

      Twenty-

  6. 28:38 – 36:08

    Where we are today

    1. HM

      I think it's, uh, it's gone on a good while, and, uh, it's, uh, it's not nascent. It's not adolescent. Uh, it's, but it's also not, uh, uh, uh, geriatric. I think it's in middle age, uh, and, and I think, I think the US economy, if that's what you're talking about, is healthy and, and doing quite well. Uh, if, if the thing that presages a, a downturn is excesses to the upside, you don't find too many of those, you know? Uh, when I go to a city, I, I look for construction cranes in the sky to tell me if there's a building boom. Most booms are followed at some point by busts. I don't see it in most of our cities. Uh, I don't see, uh, inventories growing. Uh, inventory growth is, uh, uh, in- inventories grow for two reasons. In times of, uh, s- weak consumption, because people don't buy the things that manufacturers produce, in times of, of, of, of strong consumption, uh, inventories grow b- because manufacturers amp up production to get ahead of some, uh, anticipated surge in demand, and those often prese- presage downturns when they turn out not to be warranted. I don't see that.

    2. NK

      In some sectors, do you?

    3. HM

      Well, I mean, maybe. I, I don't, I don't look at the data finely enough to tell you that.

    4. NK

      In AI, maybe?

    5. HM

      Pardon me?

    6. NK

      In AI, maybe?

    7. HM

      Uh, well of course we don't talk about inventory in AI, but there's certainly a boom in capital investment for AI.

    8. NK

      One could say hardware, energy, compute is inventory.

    9. HM

      Yeah. Well, I mean, look, there's massive construction of infrastructure for AI.

    10. NK

      Much like buildings.

    11. HM

      Yes, yes.

    12. NK

      And Queens.

    13. HM

      Yes. That's right. That, that, well, that is, that is the area that's booming in our economy, and, uh, I need, uh, people who know more about AI than me to tell me whether it's gonna bust. You know, the question is, is all of this con- or, or is some of this construction unwarranted? Um, uh, I don't think anybody can tell us that. We do know, we certainly know that it is an area of, of, uh, of boom.

    14. NK

      How do you stay so sharp, Howard, at your age? Like, I have watched a whole bunch of your interviews and read a lot of what you have written over the years. As a stock market investor all my life, uh, I think there's so much I can learn from you. But how do you stay this sharp today?

    15. HM

      Well, I don't think, I don't, I mean... I'm lucky. I have-

    16. NK

      Genetically?

    17. HM

      Well, I, I think I'm, I think I'm very lucky genetically.

    18. NK

      Okay.

    19. HM

      Yes, because, uh, my dad lived to 101, and he was quite sharp at the end.

    20. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    21. HM

      Uh, and, uh, you know, uh, we all face a, a, a decline at some point in time.

    22. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    23. HM

      And the only question is, when does this start, and, and, and at what rate does it progress? And, uh, you know, uh, uh, you look at, uh, Warren Buffett, Charlie Munger, some of my, uh, role models and, uh, friends, and, uh, uh, you know, uh, they were or, or are, uh, sharp in their mid-90s and late 90s. So it, it, it's just a... I mean, I didn't... When you say, "How do you stay sharp?" I don't go to the gym and work- Well, I do do a lot of puzzles, and I read, and I read in fields that are not my fields.

    24. NK

      Mm.

    25. HM

      I, you know, I th- I'm still trying to gain knowledge and broaden myself. And, uh, I, I guess I make some effort to, uh, to, uh, plow new ground, and the question is, when do you stop doing that? At what age? But, you know, I, my last two memos, uh... I hope your audience knows about the memos.

    26. NK

      Yeah.

    27. HM

      But the, I wrote one December 9th and one, I think February 25th, uh, um, about AI.

    28. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    29. HM

      And I had to do a lot of learning.

    30. NK

      You changed your mind on AI as well.

  7. 36:08 – 42:57

    Drifting versus seeing the river

    1. HM

      I imagine there are people who do it intentionally, people who, uh, go to the mountain and m- meditate-

    2. NK

      Mm-hmm

    3. HM

      ... and think about it and conclude, "You know what? I really should change my focus at this point in my life."

    4. NK

      Have you even to, have you been able to ever pull that off? Like I've been fascinated with the idea of going to a mountain and Arriving at some kind of evolutionary thought in my mind which makes me actively transition into something.

    5. HM

      Mm.

    6. NK

      Have you been able to touch that?

    7. HM

      Well, I, I, I, I, I haven't physically gone to the mountain-

    8. NK

      Mm-hmm

    9. HM

      ... but I, I think the key, uh... I've do- I've written the first pages of a book.

    10. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    11. HM

      Uh, I think the... I think the, the, the key to all of this, to all of life, is to behave thoughtfully with your mind engaged. Not just, uh, let the river take you, but give thought to what's going on, why is it going on, what does it mean, why did it happen, what does it imply for me, what should I do about it? And, uh, it's the... That's, that, that is, I think, going through life with your eyes open, uh, and that's how you can intentionally get to a higher stage in life by doing that. And, and the, the, the, uh, the image that comes back to me is the image of whether you let the river take you or whether you, uh, try to figure out a, a better place to get to and then try to get there.

    12. NK

      Maybe once or twice in my life I have felt like I could see the river.

    13. HM

      See-

    14. NK

      The river

    15. HM

      ... the river. Yes.

    16. NK

      Can you actively?

    17. HM

      Um, I, I think at this stage I, I, I am able to think about this progression constructively. When I think about m- my early decades, not years, decades, and I think about, uh, you know, what I did from, let's say, I would say from the beginning of, let's say, high school-

    18. NK

      Mm-hmm

    19. HM

      ... 1960-

    20. NK

      Mm-hmm

    21. HM

      ... until starting Oaktree in, in '95.

    22. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    23. HM

      So that 35-year period, which took me up to age, uh, let's say 49. I was adrift. I did not make proactive decisions. I let the river take me. I'm very lucky that it took me to some good places-

    24. NK

      Mm-hmm

    25. HM

      ... in, in s- in several different aspects of life. But I don't consider... When I look at my behavior, I don't consider it thoughtful or intentional, and so, uh, I'm just lucky that I got to a good place despite my own inattention. Uh, I think that, uh, starting Oaktree was the biggest and maybe first, uh, thing I really did with intention, and, uh, I've, and I've tried to be more intentional since then. But when I look back and I describe, uh, how I selected my career, how I selected my first job, how I decided to go to graduate school, uh, uh, and, and, uh, h- h- and, and, and how I transitioned from, from, uh, uh, the, the equities department, uh, to the bond world, uh, in 1978, uh, in time to, uh, in time to have the benefit of the, uh, birth of high-yield bonds, it was all happenstance, serendipity, coincidence, uh, passivity. You know, I, I, I was not making intentional decisions in that period.

    26. NK

      What changed? How did you become intentional from being unintentional when you began Oaktree? Because other peop- people can maybe learn from it. Maybe I can learn how-

    27. HM

      Yeah

    28. NK

      ... to catch it.

    29. HM

      Well, the easy answer is that my wife pushed me, uh, uh, to, to, uh, think about it more and to, uh, independently start Oaktree. My partner Bruce Karsh, uh, uh, and I d- did it together. He, he... So his participation, uh, encouraged mine. Uh-

    30. NK

      But-

  8. 42:57 – 49:45

    Oak Tree and accidental entrepreneurship

    1. HM

      So I think that, I think that, uh, thank God I, I rose to the occasion and, and left TCW with Bruce and, and my other partners to start Oaktree. And then I think that it was, uh... I don't, I don't think I ever said, "Well, now I'm gonna start taking control of my life. Now I'm gonna start acting intentionally. Now I'm gonna become a leader." I just think it was inescapable.

    2. NK

      That's very interesting because it sounds like you're saying entrepreneurship and taking risk can trigger the riding the river to seeing the river.

    3. HM

      Some people are driven entrepreneurially. I think that entrepreneurship is the epitome of intentionality. It's, it's taking the bull by the horns, as we say, proactively. So I think the entrepreneur naturally, innately does the opposite of drifting down the river. Um, and, um, my inclination was not entrepreneurial, you know. Uh, I, I, uh, I liked most of what I was doing at TCW, uh, but, uh, with, uh, with en-encouragement from Bruce Karsh and my wife, and with a little encouragement from TCW to leave in terms of how I thought I was treated, my inertia was overcome. That's what I would describe. You know, it wasn't a proactive decision, "Hey, let's, let's get going." It was the unlikely overcoming of my innate inertia. It's a very different story.

    4. NK

      It could be like a chicken and egg thing.

    5. HM

      Oh, it's very chicken and egg, yes. But, but, uh, I think the important thing is, for the purposes of your audience, that my departure from TCW did not start with an entrepreneurial spirit. And some people-- I know, I know people who, you know, who were entrepre-- I mean, uh, you know, always dreamed of making a lot of money, always dreamed of r-running their own business, chafed at being an employee, had to get out and start their own. Uh, that, that, that was never descriptive of me.

    6. NK

      Mm.

    7. HM

      So I kind of, I k-I kind of, uh, did something that you might call entrepreneurial, uh, despite myself is the way I would describe it, r-rather than because of my, uh, innate drive.

    8. NK

      So Howard, my job for twenty years has been that of a stock investor.

    9. HM

      Mm-hmm.

    10. NK

      You've been a debt person almost all your life. Why would you be in a asset class which has finite upside, and the downside, I guess, is finite because in most cases it's zero, versus equity, where you could have exponential upside?

    11. HM

      Well, that's a great question. And, uh, I, I haven't really been asked that question much in the past. My answer may take a while.

    12. NK

      Yeah.

    13. HM

      Settle in.

    14. NK

      Yeah.

    15. HM

      Uh... The, the question as you pose it is an interesting question if you assume rationality and objectivity. But that ignores personal, let's say, kinks. So I'll return to that. But first of all, my decision to move from-- I, I spent nine years in the equity department, so it wasn't really at the very beginning. It felt like a long time.

    16. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    17. HM

      But my decision to move from the equity department in '69 to, to the bond department in '78 was not my decision, and it, it, it, it, uh, it wasn't because I figured out it would be better for me. Uh, the, the, the, the Citibank I joined in September of '69 was an investor in what was called the Nifty Fifty.

    18. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    19. HM

      The fifty supposedly best and fastest growing companies in America, companies where nothing bad could ever happen. There was no price too high for the stock. And if you bought those stocks the day I got to work in September '69, if you held them tenaciously for, for five years, you lost about ninety-five percent of your money. Ninety-five percent. Because for many of them, something did go wrong, and for all of them, the price was too high. The P/E ratios, as I recall, were mostly between sixty and ninety So it was a, uh... And, and so that was a real disaster for the people who invested in the Nifty50, which was most of the money center banks. And I was, uh, director of research by the mid-'70s, so I was part of the process, and we hired a new CIO, uh, who wanted to have a new head of research, and, uh, I helped him hire my successor. And then he said, "What do you wanna do next?" I said, "I don't know. I could do this, I could do that." Typically, I didn't think it over very much or, or assess my strengths and weaknesses very well. And he said, "I'd like you to move to the bond department and start a convertible bond fund," 'cause he had come from a place that had a, had one, and it was very successful, and we didn't have one. And I said yes. So that was the extent of my intentionality, which is almost non-existent. It was, you know, uh... And, and I say now, and it may be an exaggeration, but I was lucky I didn't get fired. Uh, but American companies gave pretty much lifetime employment at that time. Anyway, so, so number one,

  9. 49:45 – 57:14

    Why bonds over equities

    1. HM

      my move to s- to the bond department was not voluntary, other than I could have said no. Uh, uh, but number two, you talk about the fact that bonds have, uh, capped upside and some downside from default, certainly true, but it fit me because I was brought up to be very conservative. My parents were adults during the Depression. Now, your parents probably weren't alive during the Depression, or, and most people I know, uh, who are old, their parents were children during the Depression. My parents were adults during the Depression, which meant when I grew up, what did I hear?

    2. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    3. HM

      Don't put all your eggs in one basket. Save for a rainy day. Uh, avoid risk, s- et cetera. So-

    4. NK

      I think Indians p- Indian parents lived through pseudo socialism in the country.

    5. HM

      Mm-hmm. Mm.

    6. NK

      Similar.

    7. HM

      Yeah.

    8. NK

      Not as bad.

    9. HM

      Yeah, yeah. But, but, um, y- see, you as, as a stock guy look at bonds and say, "No upside, some downside." I say, "Predictable outcome, which is achieved almost every time."

    10. NK

      Is that true, though? 'Cause a lot of the distressed bonds that you are in, which have fairly high coupons, is the chance of a downside zero?

    11. HM

      I said almost every time.

    12. NK

      Mm.

    13. HM

      And, you know, uh, uh, first of all, uh, so as I said, I moved to the bond department in '78, uh, May of '78. In Ei- August of '78, I got the phone call that changed my life from the head of the bond department, who said, "There's some guy in California named Milken or something-

    14. NK

      Mm-hmm

    15. HM

      ... who deals in something called high-yield bonds. Do you think you can figure out what that is?" 'Cause the client had asked for a portfolio.

    16. NK

      Junk bonds.

    17. HM

      Pardon me?

    18. NK

      Junk bonds. Milken, Michael Milken junk bonds?

    19. HM

      Yeah. Yeah, junk bonds.

    20. NK

      Yeah.

    21. HM

      So, so I said, "Yes."

    22. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    23. HM

      "I can do it." And that put me here today, 48 years later. Um, but, but, um... So I, I b- uh, if you've read Malcolm Gladwell, Outliers, you know the importance of right time, right place. I was in the right place at the right time. I was in... Uh, that put me in high-yield bonds at the beginning of the high-yield bond movement.

    24. NK

      I've met Michael Milken, and because he got unlucky later in life, it couldn't have just been right place, right time, because it didn't go that way for him for a period of time.

    25. HM

      Well, that's right, but, uh, things in his existence conspired to produce a bad result for a while. Uh, but not for me. I got there at the beginning. The, the... What Malcolm Gladwell's book is really about, Nikhil, is about it's great to be at the front of the line. That's really what it's about. He talks about demographic luck.

    26. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    27. HM

      Right? Right time, right place. And, and-

    28. NK

      I think the question is how do you figure out where is the front of the line?

    29. HM

      Well, you... Well, I didn't.

    30. NK

      Mm.

  10. 57:14 – 1:05:36

    Distressed bonds and excess returns

    1. NK

      Can you contextualize distressed bonds? Let's say the US Treasury, US government borrows at 4%. Let's say I read somewhere that Google is borrowing 100-year paper at 6%, which sounds crazy, and we'll get to that.

    2. HM

      Yeah.

    3. NK

      What kind of companies are in this distressed bond ecosystem, and what rate of return are they paying, rate of interest?

    4. HM

      Well, let's, we have to clarify.

    5. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    6. HM

      Oaktree and I ha- have two businesses.

    7. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    8. HM

      One we perform, we call performing credit-

    9. NK

      Mm-hmm

    10. HM

      ... and one we call opportunistic credit. That's the new euphemism for distressed.

    11. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    12. HM

      So I-

    13. NK

      Wouldn't you benefit from calling it junk so you have a higher margin because more people would stay out of it?

    14. HM

      Yes, if they listened to me.

    15. NK

      [laughs]

    16. HM

      If I was that influential. But, and, and that's the right kind of, kind of, uh, counterthinking. But, uh, on the other hand, a big part of our business now is making loans to companies that need what we call rescue loans.

    17. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    18. HM

      They don't like to be associated with the word distressed.

    19. NK

      Fair.

    20. HM

      So we're more likely to get their business-

    21. NK

      Mm-hmm

    22. HM

      ... if we call it opportunistic.

    23. NK

      Fair.

    24. HM

      Um, so, uh, you know, in the performing credit area-

    25. NK

      Mm-hmm

    26. HM

      ... we lend money to companies that the world thinks has a, let's say, three, four, five, 6% of not paying us.

    27. NK

      Hmm.

    28. HM

      Prob- three, four, five, 6% probability of not paying us.

    29. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    30. HM

      We lend them money if we think it's one or 2%. So if the world thinks they're 5% likely to not pay us, and we conclude that they're only 2% likely to not pay us, then the world requires them to pay an, a rate of interest which is commensurate with their 5% probability of non-payment, which means if we're right, and it's only two, we're getting something for nothing.

  11. 1:05:36 – 1:12:42

    Beginning a new career today

    1. NK

      If you had to begin a new career today, for the next forty years-

    2. HM

      Yes

    3. NK

      ... would you pick debt over equity again?

    4. HM

      For me?

    5. NK

      For you.

    6. HM

      Or for, or for the average watcher?

    7. NK

      Let's say for the average watcher.

    8. HM

      Um, well, I think that, I think that we were very fortunate in getting into some debt markets before they were discovered and before people understood them, and we benefited from people's, uh, uh, antagonism-

    9. NK

      Mm-hmm

    10. HM

      ... toward those markets. Uh, those opportunities are in the past.

    11. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    12. HM

      Um, so-

    13. NK

      Where's the front of the line today?

    14. HM

      Well, I mean, who is the person in the investment business today who will find the most success in the next ten years? The answer is, in my opinion, the person who best understands AI-

    15. NK

      Mm-hmm

    16. HM

      ... and its capabilities and implications. So, but I-

    17. NK

      Or is a contrarian and doesn't believe in AI.

    18. HM

      Pardon me?

    19. NK

      Or he could be a contrarian and bet against AI.

    20. HM

      Well, that's what I said. I said, "Best understands." I didn't say, "Is most in favor of."

    21. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    22. HM

      So if, if AI is gonna disappoint, the expectations are very high And when you, as you know from being a stock picker, when you go into something [clears throat] where the expectations are very high, it's very easy to lose money-

    23. NK

      Mm-hmm

    24. HM

      ... if those, uh, uh, expectations aren't rewarded.

    25. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    26. HM

      So yes, maybe, maybe, uh, i- if you're the person who best understands AI today, maybe you'll make a lot of money by understanding that it's overdone and betting against it.

    27. NK

      The current expectation with AI is almost dystopia or utopia.

    28. HM

      Yes.

    29. NK

      Which is crazy, I think.

    30. HM

      Well, I don't know.

  12. 1:12:42 – 1:20:08

    Active management versus indexation

    1. HM

      And, um, uh, but I, I believe that people can do some things that AI can't.

    2. NK

      Could you also say that indexation and ETFs have taken over because the markets have been in an uptrend, largely? In a more volatile time, active might make sense. In a depression, active might make sense.

    3. HM

      You know what? The bad times create an opening-

    4. NK

      Mm-hmm

    5. HM

      ... for active management.

    6. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    7. HM

      But it's still hard.

    8. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    9. HM

      And not many people can do it well. Why do bad times create an opening? Because panic drives down, let's say, stock prices.

    10. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    11. HM

      But the same panic causes most people to panic, which means that most people can't stop, up, and buy in the panic. And there's a, there was a guy named Wally Deemer, who was an old-time trader, who had some great quotes, and he turned them into a little book. And h- but his greatest quote of all is, "When the time comes to buy, you won't want to." So this, this idea that upheaval creates opportunity is logically correct, but not realistic because most people's psychological impediments prevent them from taking advantage of the upheaval. You see?

    12. NK

      Maybe you mix active plus AI together to try and take emotion out of it.

    13. HM

      Well, that, that could work.

    14. NK

      Mm.

    15. HM

      That could work. If, if Claude could call you or send you a message which says, "This is one of those opportunities we talked about, don't be stupid, get your ass in gear-

    16. NK

      Mm-hmm

    17. HM

      ... and buy something. Don't hide in your, in your-

    18. NK

      [laughs]

    19. HM

      ... in your, uh, in your hole."

    20. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    21. HM

      That could, that could be a good thing, yes. But, but I still think that, I still think, Nikhil, that when you get into areas which are not connected, what I would call mechanically, where, where, where physical laws are not everything-

    22. NK

      Mm-hmm

    23. HM

      ... that means that human psychology plays a role in developments, and that tells me that people who are superior at dealing with human psychology can get an advantage. And I think that includes investing.

    24. NK

      I agree.

    25. HM

      But not everybody.

    26. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    27. HM

      It always comes back to not everybody. And, you know, there's a, there's a phrase in, in our world, a friend of mine in England used it as the title for a book, Simple But Not Easy.

    28. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    29. HM

      Our job is simple. We gotta find the best managers-

    30. NK

      Mm-hmm

  13. 1:20:08 – 1:27:25

    Learning from Andrew, second level thinking

    1. NK

      I'm sure Andrew has learnt so much from you. Is there one thing that you learned from Andrew?

    2. HM

      Oh, I've learned so much because y- and this is how we started the conversation. You said to me, "How do you stay sharp?"

    3. NK

      Yeah.

    4. HM

      And, and, uh, you know, uh, speaking with young people-

    5. NK

      Mm-hmm

    6. HM

      ... if you st- if, if you st- speak, if I speak to my contemporaries, how am I ever gonna learn anything?

    7. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    8. HM

      Speaking with young people is how you learn, and y- y- they, they know stuff you don't know because they are still learning, and they learned more recently, and hopefully you have something you can give them in exchange, which is experience that they don't have 'cause they haven't lived eighty years. Uh, but Andrew is essentially your age.

    9. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    10. HM

      Uh, and I wrote a memo-

    11. NK

      Mm-hmm

    12. HM

      ... after that experience, uh, three generations living under one roof-

    13. NK

      Mm-hmm

    14. HM

      ... was of great value, and I wrote a memo called Something of Value, and the other reason I chose that title is 'cause we mostly talked about something called value investing. Uh, but I get so much from him, and he pushes me to see things that I don't... wouldn't otherwise see, and he's also intolerant of, of my not, uh, staying sharp and moving ahead. You know, how, how do you s- how do you keep moving ahead at eighty? That's really the question. But I, I don't think it's impossible. But a, a, a great example, I mean, the, the example that immediately comes to mind, uh, and I think it's a, it's a great one, is that he observed, and I wrote in the memo, the memo was Something of Value, January of '21, as I recall. He pointed out, it was almost revelatory, readily available quantitative information about the present cannot hold the key to success because everybody has it. Success in investing is doing better than others. S- in- investing is a, is a funny field because it's really easy to be average, and it's really hard to be above average. But readily available quantitative information about the present is not gonna make you above average for the simple reason that everybody has it. And, and I talk in the memo about that one of the reasons Buffett was able to steal a march on everybody else and become Buffett is because nobody, uh, he, he, he sought it out and he worked it when nobody else did. And, you know, when I was starting off in this business, in the research world, think about your process. Let's say I said, "Um, you know, I went into a store today, I bought a product, I liked the product. I think maybe that company has a future. I'd like to learn about it." How would you get information? Think about what you would do if you had that experience this morning here in New York City. What did we do then? You know what we did then? We wrote a letter to the company and asked it for a copy of the annual report. It took a week for them to get that letter. They put it at the bottom of the pile, and they took the letter off the top of the pile, and they sent that person an annual report. It took a week or two to get down to my letter, and then they took an annual report, put it in an envelope, addressed it to me, put a stamp on, put it in the mailbox, and it took a week for it to get to me. Now, I exaggerate, but the point is, it took a month to get an annual report so that I could start studying the company. There was no online. There was no wiki or whatever source you might use. Uh, the only alternative was there were, there were books called Moody's Manuals.

    15. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    16. HM

      And they were, each book was this thick, no, this thick. Take it off the shelf. It had a paper called onion skin-

    17. NK

      Mm-hmm

    18. HM

      ... the thinnest of paper, and it had tiny print, tiny print. You needed glasses. And it, it, they had the financials, the current financials on every company. Not much, uh, narrative, nothing, no discussion of the future, but just the financials of every company. That's all you could get until your annual report came in the mail. Then maybe you could start figuring out the business and its potential. So, uh, you could, if you were Buffett, and if you sat in your office in Omaha and read the Moody's Manual when nobody else was willing 'cause it was stultifying, you could get an advantage.

    19. NK

      Is that what he did?

    20. HM

      I think, well, that's an ex-- that's my-

    21. NK

      Mm-hmm

    22. HM

      ... that's my illustration of what he did. Maybe he did more. I don't know. But-

    23. NK

      I'm no one to pay you a compliment, Howard, but if I could-

    24. HM

      Yes

    25. NK

      ... I think-

    26. HM

      Compliments are always good.

    27. NK

      [laughs] I think the nimbleness and the willingness you have to change at eighty is by far the most impressive thing about you. And when I speak to really successful people, I think this trait over all others kind of makes them who they are.

    28. HM

      Well, I, I appreciate that comment. I hope it's true. Uh, but it makes sense, doesn't it? Because the ability to change your mind and change your thinking and learn new things is an, is, is an example or a component of superior insight, which is what you have to be. This is a competitive game. Uh, it's like golf. You say, "Today, I shot seventy-four."

    29. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    30. HM

      I tell you I shot seventy-four.

  14. 1:27:25 – 1:34:28

    How to become contrarian and better

    1. HM

      Well, you know, it's a funny thing. This has been a theme for me for the last nine months. I say this every time I get a question like yours, Nikhil. The, the really hard questions are the ones that start with the word how.

    2. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    3. HM

      How can I learn the need to evolve and grow? How can I learn to see things better, more clearly than other people? How can I learn to be a credit analyst who better understands the default probability than anybody else? How can I become a s- what I call a second level thinker, uh, understanding things at a higher level and better than other people? And h- all the hows, I can't tell you. How, how can I remain sharp at eighty? I can't tell you. I can tell you what you have to do. You have to do all the things that I mentioned in order to be a superior investor. I just can't tell you how to do it. And in my first book, uh, it's, it's funny, when, when, when I sa- uh, when I had the idea for the first book, which is called The Most Important Thing, it has twenty-one chapters. Each chapter says, "The most important thing is..." And then it's a different thing, 'cause there are so many things that are important. And I told Columbia about the book, and they wanted to publish the book, Columbia University. And so they said, "Give us a sample chapter." And I wrote out a chapter ca- sa- sa- each chapter says, "The most important thing is..." And this one says, "Second level thinking." And I wrote the chapter about second level. I had never really thought about it before. It just kind of struck me, and I wrote it down. Um, uh, and, and it, what it says is it, it's pretty simple. If you think the same as everybody else, you'll act the same as everybody else. If e- if you act the same as everybody else, your investments will perform the same as everybody else. So to perform better, you have to deviate from the herd. Seems clear.

    4. NK

      Do you think, uh-

    5. HM

      How do you do it? How do you do it? And, uh, I said in the book, a- asking how to, how to become... I, I can tell you the importance of second level thinking, but a- asking me how to become a second level thinker is like in basketball we say, "You can't coach height." All the coaching in the world will not make your team taller. So can you-- I can tell you that you must become a second level thinker to be successful as an investor. I just can't tell you how.

    6. NK

      If I were to draw a extrapolation that second level thinking is also contrarian thinking in a way-

    7. HM

      Mm-hmm, mm-hmm

    8. NK

      ... do you think AIs which are predictive in nature can be modeled to be contradictory tomorrow?

    9. HM

      I... But that's the challenge, you see.

    10. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    11. HM

      Because second level thinking, or contrarian thinking, is not just different from the herd.

    12. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    13. HM

      That's not enough.

    14. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    15. HM

      It has to be different from the herd and better. So you can say, you could... I, I, I don't know how to, how to program AI, but I assume you can say to Claude-

    16. NK

      Mm-hmm

    17. HM

      ... every answer you give me on every company has to be different from the consensus.

    18. NK

      Or the opposite of consensus.

    19. HM

      Or, well, the opposite is, is pretty categorical.

    20. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    21. HM

      But let's say has to deviate from the consensus.

    22. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    23. HM

      I don't want it... And no consensus thinking is welcome here.

    24. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    25. HM

      You can say that. You can, you can make it be different. Can you make it be better?

    26. NK

      Mm.

    27. HM

      If, if it... 'Cause, you see, this is the catch. Because the people you compete against in the investment arena are also intelligent, educated, literate- Computer able, highly motivated, they're pretty good.

    28. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    29. HM

      Met- much of the time they're as close to right as you can get. So if you believe the consensus is as close to right as most people can get, then if you tell Claude, "I only want non-consensus thinking," then it has a high probability of being wrong. That's not a good thing.

    30. NK

      In a way, AI in investing could work if everyone in investing uses AI.

  15. 1:34:28 – 1:43:16

    Learning from history, final advice

    1. HM

      I don't, I don't consider myself a futurist.

    2. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    3. HM

      I don't engage-

    4. NK

      Yeah

    5. HM

      ... in that kind of... That's, that kind of thinking is what we call blue sky.

    6. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    7. HM

      And, uh, I am partial to what Albert Einstein said on the subject.

    8. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    9. HM

      He said something like, "I don't think about the future, it'll come soon enough."

    10. NK

      But do I think about the past?

    11. HM

      I think about the past to learn from it, and I j- I try to, I try to, uh... I'm, I'm great on these quotes.

    12. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    13. HM

      And my favorite on this subject is from Mark Twain-

    14. NK

      Mm-hmm

    15. HM

      ... who supposedly, but I think didn't really say it, supposedly said, "History does not repeat, but it does rhyme."

    16. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    17. HM

      There are certain themes that re- that rhyme from instance to instance in history.

    18. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    19. HM

      And, um, they mostly have to do with human nature.

    20. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    21. HM

      And I think human nature doesn't change incredibly slowly. I mean, uh, ev- when, when we talk about fight or flight, people will start talking about the, the, the, the, uh, the Stone Age man-

    22. NK

      Mm-hmm

    23. HM

      ... and the, and the watering hole, right?

    24. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    25. HM

      Well, that was millions of years ago. These things are still relevant. So, so the point is that, that, uh, uh, I think, I think you can learn from history.

    26. NK

      Mm-hmm.

    27. HM

      And what you, what you mostly learn are the lessons of human nature.

    28. NK

      Mark Twain said that, and Napoleon said, "History is written by the winners of tomorrow." So we don't even know how accurate the history we have access to really is.

    29. HM

      Well, except, except for we have the numbers.

    30. NK

      Financial history.

Episode duration: 1:43:16

Install uListen for AI-powered chat & search across the full episode — Get Full Transcript

Transcript of episode 2HIJlD46Kig

Get more out of YouTube videos.

Read along on your phone, search it beside the video, or ask your favorite AI app what was said.

iOSAndroidClaudeChromeChatGPTComing soon