No PriorsThe Future of Warfare: How the US Department of War Thinks About AI
At a glance
WHAT IT’S REALLY ABOUT
Pentagon’s AI push: applied deployment, autonomous systems, industrial-base rebuilding strategy
- Emil Michael, Under Secretary for Research and Engineering (and leader of the DoW’s chief AI office), describes a restructuring meant to unify technology efforts across DARPA, DIU, and other innovation arms to move faster and reduce duplication.
- He argues the urgency is driven by China’s unprecedented military buildup and by U.S. supply-chain fragility, requiring new investment levels, new entrants, and faster acquisition pathways for startups.
- A centerpiece is GenAI.mil: a secure, DoW-network GenAI platform deployed quickly to the enterprise, reaching ~1M unique users in 30 days, with multiple models and expansion across classification levels planned.
- The conversation emphasizes a shift toward distributed autonomous systems (drones/robots), scalable production (not just prototypes), and financing mechanisms (DIU, manufacturing scale programs, and the Office of Strategic Capital) to “collapse the Valley of Death.”
IDEAS WORTH REMEMBERING
5 ideasThe DoW is trying to act like a focused product organization, not a committee.
Michael says 14 “critical” tech areas created diffusion; he cut them to six and put “sprints” behind them to drive execution, signaling a cultural shift toward prioritization and delivery.
Applied AI is the #1 priority because the private sector is funding the frontier.
Rather than build a DoW foundation model, the plan is to adapt commercial models to defense use cases, focusing on deployment, security constraints, and integration with DoW workflows/data.
GenAI.mil is a template for rapid, secure AI rollout at massive scale.
Because public chatbots are generally prohibited on DoW networks, they designed a different data-flow architecture to prevent sensitive data from leaking into public model training, then shipped to millions quickly with a “tiger team.”
Defense AI deployment is organized into three lanes: enterprise, intelligence, and warfighting.
Michael frames near-term progress as “pace-setting” pathfinder projects that both deliver value (efficiency, intel fusion, planning/wargaming) and prove feasibility to overcome internal resistance.
Autonomy will take an increasing share of budgets because it’s cheaper per firepower and reduces risk to personnel.
He predicts a meaningful budget mix shift toward autonomous systems (air/sea/undersea) and suggests 20–30% of the defense budget could go to these systems within 10 years as AI enables sensing and independent action.
WORDS WORTH SAVING
5 quotesFourteen priorities mean no priorities at all.
— Emil Michael
We’re not building a foundation model at the DoW… So how do I adapt or use what’s being developed in the private sector and apply it to the Department of War use cases?
— Emil Michael
It’s crazy to me that SpaceX, and Anduril, and Palantir all had to sue the Department of War for their first contract. So the idea is, you don’t have to sue anymore. Come through the front door.
— Emil Michael
We’ve had over a million people, uniques, use it in the last thirty days.
— Emil Michael
If you come with a tech pitch and a prototype, that’s great. What’s the plan to get me ten thousand of these?
— Emil Michael
High quality AI-generated summary created from speaker-labeled transcript.
Get more out of YouTube videos.
High quality summaries for YouTube videos. Accurate transcripts to search & find moments. Powered by ChatGPT & Claude AI.
Add to Chrome