Skip to content
Peter Attia MDPeter Attia MD

197 - The science of obesity & how to improve nutritional epidemiology | David Allison, Ph.D

View episode show notes here: https://bit.ly/3HgjLMf Sign up to receive Peter's email newsletter: https://bit.ly/4c602k2 David Allison is an award-winning scientific writer who has been at the forefront of obesity research for the last 20 years. Currently the Dean of the Indiana University School of Public Health, he has also authored many publications on statistical and research methodology and how to improve research rigor and integrity. David’s focus on evidence and data brings forth an interesting discussion of what we know (and don’t know) about the science of obesity. He provides an insightful and unemotional explanation of the potential impact of nutritional epidemiology in public health while also explaining its many pitfalls and limitations. He offers his take on the path forward in addressing the obesity epidemic, and he closes with a lucid explanation for the evident lack of credibility in science and the steps we can take to change that. We discuss: 00:00:00 - Intro 00:00:10 - David’s background, interest in obesity, and focus on evidence 00:08:44 - The moment when the obesity crisis was recognized, and the sloppy science that ensued 00:17:11 - What twins studies tell us about the genetics of obesity 00:20:36 - How doctors and scientists have historically approached obesity treatment 00:28:45 - Do surgical procedures for obesity prolong life? 00:34:08 - The ‘Obesity Paradox’ 00:41:48 - Interpreting BMI and mortality data and considering confounders 00:49:54 - How body composition and ethnicity factor into consideration of BMI data 00:57:12 - Superior tools for measuring obesity at the individual level 01:02:31 - Using BMI data for actionable steps to combat obesity 01:06:55 - Why maintaining weight loss is more challenging than losing weight 01:18:44 - Differing perspectives on the utility of nutritional epidemiology 01:25:08 - A mouse study illustrating the impossibility of fully controlling for confounds in observational studies 01:29:59 - Limitations of nutritional epidemiology and how it can improve 01:42:06 - Addressing the obesity epidemic—the path forward and obstacles to overcome 01:53:28 - What David believes to be the most promising interventions we could take to address obesity and improve public health 01:57:45 - Reproducibility in science, normative and non-normative errors explained 02:05:27 - Rebuilding trust in science and differentiating between science and advocacy -------- About: The Peter Attia Drive is a weekly, ultra-deep-dive podcast focusing on maximizing health, longevity, critical thinking…and a few other things. With over 40 million episodes downloaded, it features topics including fasting, ketosis, Alzheimer’s disease, cancer, mental health, and much more. Peter is a physician focusing on the applied science of longevity. His practice deals extensively with nutritional interventions, exercise physiology, sleep physiology, emotional and mental health, and pharmacology to increase lifespan (delay the onset of chronic disease), while simultaneously improving healthspan (quality of life). Learn more: https://bit.ly/36Fzacz Subscribe to receive exclusive subscriber-only content: https://bit.ly/3peEnyh Sign up to receive Peter's email newsletter: https://bit.ly/36toqxK Connect with Peter on: Facebook: http://bit.ly/PeterAttiaMDFB Twitter: http://bit.ly/PeterAttiaMDTW Instagram: http://bit.ly/PeterAttiaMDIG Subscribe to The Drive: Apple Podcast: http://bit.ly/TheDriveApplePodcasts Overcast: http://bit.ly/TheDriveOvercast Spotify: http://bit.ly/TheDriveSpotify Google Podcasts: http://bit.ly/TheDriveGoogle

Peter AttiahostDavid Allisonguest
Feb 28, 20222h 21mWatch on YouTube ↗

Episode Details

EPISODE INFO

Released
February 28, 2022
Duration
2h 21m
Channel
Peter Attia MD
Watch on YouTube
▶ Open ↗

EPISODE DESCRIPTION

View episode show notes here: https://bit.ly/3HgjLMf Sign up to receive Peter's email newsletter: https://bit.ly/4c602k2 David Allison is an award-winning scientific writer who has been at the forefront of obesity research for the last 20 years. Currently the Dean of the Indiana University School of Public Health, he has also authored many publications on statistical and research methodology and how to improve research rigor and integrity. David’s focus on evidence and data brings forth an interesting discussion of what we know (and don’t know) about the science of obesity. He provides an insightful and unemotional explanation of the potential impact of nutritional epidemiology in public health while also explaining its many pitfalls and limitations. He offers his take on the path forward in addressing the obesity epidemic, and he closes with a lucid explanation for the evident lack of credibility in science and the steps we can take to change that. We discuss: 00:00:00 - Intro 00:00:10 - David’s background, interest in obesity, and focus on evidence 00:08:44 - The moment when the obesity crisis was recognized, and the sloppy science that ensued 00:17:11 - What twins studies tell us about the genetics of obesity 00:20:36 - How doctors and scientists have historically approached obesity treatment 00:28:45 - Do surgical procedures for obesity prolong life? 00:34:08 - The ‘Obesity Paradox’ 00:41:48 - Interpreting BMI and mortality data and considering confounders 00:49:54 - How body composition and ethnicity factor into consideration of BMI data 00:57:12 - Superior tools for measuring obesity at the individual level 01:02:31 - Using BMI data for actionable steps to combat obesity 01:06:55 - Why maintaining weight loss is more challenging than losing weight 01:18:44 - Differing perspectives on the utility of nutritional epidemiology 01:25:08 - A mouse study illustrating the impossibility of fully controlling for confounds in observational studies 01:29:59 - Limitations of nutritional epidemiology and how it can improve 01:42:06 - Addressing the obesity epidemic—the path forward and obstacles to overcome 01:53:28 - What David believes to be the most promising interventions we could take to address obesity and improve public health 01:57:45 - Reproducibility in science, normative and non-normative errors explained 02:05:27 - Rebuilding trust in science and differentiating between science and advocacy -------- About: The Peter Attia Drive is a weekly, ultra-deep-dive podcast focusing on maximizing health, longevity, critical thinking…and a few other things. With over 40 million episodes downloaded, it features topics including fasting, ketosis, Alzheimer’s disease, cancer, mental health, and much more. Peter is a physician focusing on the applied science of longevity. His practice deals extensively with nutritional interventions, exercise physiology, sleep physiology, emotional and mental health, and pharmacology to increase lifespan (delay the onset of chronic disease), while simultaneously improving healthspan (quality of life). Learn more: https://bit.ly/36Fzacz Subscribe to receive exclusive subscriber-only content: https://bit.ly/3peEnyh Sign up to receive Peter's email newsletter: https://bit.ly/36toqxK Connect with Peter on: Facebook: http://bit.ly/PeterAttiaMDFB Twitter: http://bit.ly/PeterAttiaMDTW Instagram: http://bit.ly/PeterAttiaMDIG Subscribe to The Drive: Apple Podcast: http://bit.ly/TheDriveApplePodcasts Overcast: http://bit.ly/TheDriveOvercast Spotify: http://bit.ly/TheDriveSpotify Google Podcasts: http://bit.ly/TheDriveGoogle

SPEAKERS

  • Peter Attia

    host

    Physician and host of “The Drive” podcast focused on longevity, medicine, and health science.

  • David Allison

    guest

    Obesity and nutrition researcher (Ph.D.) known for work on nutritional epidemiology, study design, and scientific rigor.

EPISODE SUMMARY

In this episode of Peter Attia MD, featuring Peter Attia and David Allison, 197 - The science of obesity & how to improve nutritional epidemiology | David Allison, Ph.D explores david Allison on Obesity Science, Flawed Epidemiology, and Separating Science From Advocacy Allison explains how obesity research shifted from a physiology-led field to a public health and environmental framing in the 1990s, gaining funding but losing some rigor.

RELATED EPISODES

412 ‒ The evolving science of cancer: emerging approaches to prevention and early detection, & more

412 ‒ The evolving science of cancer: emerging approaches to prevention and early detection, & more

Longevity interventions, exercise, diagnostic screening, managing apoB, and more (AMA 78 sneak peek)

Longevity interventions, exercise, diagnostic screening, managing apoB, and more (AMA 78 sneak peek)

Peter evaluates longevity drugs, aspirin for CVD, & strategies to improve muscle (AMA 76 sneak peek)

Peter evaluates longevity drugs, aspirin for CVD, & strategies to improve muscle (AMA 76 sneak peek)

253 ‒ Hormone replacement therapy and the Women’s Health Initiative: re-examining the results

253 ‒ Hormone replacement therapy and the Women’s Health Initiative: re-examining the results

#377 ‒ Special episode: Understanding true happiness and the tools to cultivate a meaningful life

#377 ‒ Special episode: Understanding true happiness and the tools to cultivate a meaningful life

360 ‒ How to change your habits: why they form and how to build or break them

360 ‒ How to change your habits: why they form and how to build or break them

Get more out of YouTube videos.

Read along on your phone, search it beside the video, or ask your favorite AI app what was said.

iOSAndroidClaudeChromeChatGPTComing soon