Kara and Scott Shred Zuck’s Vision for AI | Pivot

Galloway stresses that the U.S. doesn’t have a monopoly on mental illness, anger, or head injuries like CTE—but it does have uniquely easy access to “weapons of war,” and international comparisons (Australia, UK) show assault-weapon bans sharply reduce mass shootings.

They note how Americans now accept heightened office security, background fear when kids are at school, and selective media outrage (more coverage when affluent white victims are involved), arguing this adaptation erodes societal wellbeing even if absolute risk remains statistically low.

Kara and Scott argue every elected official should be forced into a blind trust; refusal is basically an admission you intend to benefit from nonpublic information. Galloway pairs this with a Singapore-style model: pay members of Congress and senators $1–2M/year to remove the pretext for insider dealing—and then enforce zero tolerance.

They frame Joe Rogan, Andrew Schulz, Shane Gillis, and others as a ‘manosphere’ that once helped put Trump in office but is now increasingly criticizing him on Epstein, heavy-handed immigration raids, and censorship of students—potentially shifting young male sentiment in a way mainstream TV can’t match.

Trump’s shifting explanations for his Epstein break and his language about Epstein “stealing” a Mar-a-Lago employee make him appear more concerned about losing staff than about sexual abuse; the push to hear from Ghislaine Maxwell now, with immunity, seems transparently aimed at exonerating Trump and therefore backfires reputationally.