Skip to content
Re:Thinking with Adam GrantRe:Thinking with Adam Grant

The psychology of compatibility with Malcolm Gladwell

On tour for his new book, Vibe: The Secrets of Strong Connections in a Lonely World, Adam sits down for a crackling live event with journalist and author Malcolm Gladwell. They discuss and debate the building blocks of compatibility. Adam and Malcolm reflect on why our first impressions of people are often wrong, why people are so drawn to astrology, and how we can fix dating apps. They also explore which relationships are actually toxic, how parent-child bonds change as kids grow, and what it means to be a nerd. Follow our podcasts! ReThinking with Adam Grant: https://link.mgln.ai/kdYcyx The TED Podcasts is a collection of podcasts for the curious. The TED Podcasts videos may be used for non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons License, Attribution–Non Commercial–No Derivatives (or the CC BY – NC – ND 4.0 International) and in accordance with our TED Talks Usage Policy (https://www.ted.com/about/our-organiz...). For more information on using TED for commercial purposes (e.g. employee learning, in a film or online course), please submit a Media Request at https://media-requests.ted.com.

Adam GrantguestMalcolm Gladwellhost
Oct 23, 202655mWatch on YouTube ↗

EVERY SPOKEN WORD

  1. 0:00 – 2:59

    Pals or allies? Opening banter and what their relationship is

    1. AG

      Malcolm, what are we?

    2. MG

      I think we're pals. Don't you think we're pals?

    3. AG

      So interesting, but we've never done pal activities together.

    4. SP

      [laughs]

    5. MG

      This, this is a pal activity.

    6. SP

      [laughs]

    7. MG

      That's... [laughs] Don't you think?

    8. SP

      [upbeat music]

    9. AG

      Malcolm Gladwell, you are on book tour right now.

    10. MG

      I am.

    11. AG

      Your book has been out two weeks, and here you are coming to host me for my book tour in your city. That is an extraordinary act of generosity. I am grateful for it. Thank you.

    12. SP

      [clapping]

    13. MG

      Thank you. It's my pleasure. We should start by explaining why you're wearing a Bills jersey.

    14. AG

      Do we have to?

    15. SP

      [cheering]

    16. MG

      We have to. Adam and I had a bet when his, uh, team, the Detroit Lions, played my team, the Buffalo Bills, and you boldly predicted-

    17. AG

      [laughs]

    18. MG

      ... that your team would win, and you said loser had to wear the jersey of the opposing team to this event.

    19. SP

      [clapping]

    20. AG

      [laughs]

    21. MG

      Ladies and gentlemen, the loser.

    22. AG

      I'm regret- I'm regretting that decision right now.

    23. MG

      How does that feel to walk around with a Bills jersey?

    24. AG

      [laughs] I mean, the Bills have suffered for a long time, much like my Lions. I, I'm feeling your pain quite literally right now.

    25. MG

      Yeah. Are you gonna wear this, like, home with you? Are you gonna... You're not gonna take it off when you go backstage.

    26. AG

      I, I was actually gonna gift it to you at the end.

    27. MG

      [laughs] Okay.

    28. AG

      First of all, Peloton, thank you Peloton for sponsoring us tonight. I have a Peloton Tread and bike at home, and training on them is my only shot at ever competing with Malcolm in a race, which he has not taken me up on yet, 'cause he knows he's gonna destroy me. But I had a chance to do a Peloton class yesterday, uh, where we w- we did a workout combined with a, a conversation about Vibe, and it was intense. Um, and I loved it. It wasn't just fun. Sweating together is social grease, and one of my favorite things about Peloton is you can start bringing some familiarity with other people and a sense of belonging into a workout even when you're not in the same room. So Peloton, thank you for sponsoring us.

    29. SP

      [clapping]

    30. MG

      And I wanna, I wanna talk around the book. We're not gonna tell you what's in the book. You should read the book. My hope is that at least half of these questions you will never get again-

  2. 2:59 – 5:04

    The three relationship roles: allies, pals, and companions

    1. MG

      We should feel free to do that. So define for us those three categories, what they mean in your, in the context of your book, and then we'll, we'll dig into this.

    2. AG

      All right. So there are basically three important kinds of people in your life, and I discovered this is true in pretty much every culture around the world. They have different terms for them. But I've come to think of them as allies, pals, and companions. So your allies are people that you pursue goals with. They're your favorite collaborators. Your pals are people you have fun with. You would love to invite them to play pickleball or karaoke or whatever your idea of a good time is. And your companions are people you confide in. Uh, they're the people whose shoulders you can cry on. They're the people who will drop everything to, to drive you to the hospital if there's an emergency. And I have found this to be such an eye-opening way to look at my own relationships, because before, I just used to call people friends or family or colleagues or neighbors, and that tells you how I know them, but it doesn't reveal anything about what purpose that relationship serves, and it certainly doesn't explain why some colleagues feel like friends and some friends feel like family and some family I would prefer to disown.

    3. MG

      Hmm.

    4. AG

      So Malcolm, what are we?

    5. MG

      I think we're pals. Don't you think we're pals? I wouldn't be here if I w-

    6. AG

      I mean, now, now I do.

    7. MG

      No, I, I wouldn't have done this if we were allies.

    8. SP

      [laughs]

    9. MG

      When I think of an ally, I think of a, of a transaction.

    10. AG

      Oh, no, that's an associate.

    11. MG

      Oh, that's an associate.

    12. AG

      Yeah, that's the, that's the other category of, of transactional relationships where people just meet each other's needs.

    13. MG

      But an ally are two people working towards some shared goal.

    14. AG

      Yeah, we've got a common mission. I think we both love exploring ideas and-

    15. MG

      Yeah, but the reason I'm here is I thought this would be really fun.

    16. SP

      [laughs]

    17. AG

      Oh. Well, I did too.

    18. MG

      I think of you as-- I think we pretend that we're allies, but we're actually pals.

    19. AG

      So interesting, but we've never done pal activities together.

    20. SP

      [laughs]

    21. MG

      This, this is a pal activity.

    22. SP

      [laughs]

    23. MG

      That's... [laughs] Don't you think?

    24. AG

      It's, I think it has pal energy, but for me it's an act of allyship, because you're helping me share my ideas and learn-

    25. MG

      Yeah

    26. AG

      ... new things about them, and I hope I do the same thing for you. And we're on a common mission to make people smarter and more curious and more open-minded.

  3. 5:04 – 6:32

    When people disagree about the relationship—and why it can still work

    1. MG

      Well, so there are several interesting places we can go from here. One is that you and I, there is a discrepancy in how we define our relationship, which I kind of like.

    2. SP

      [laughs]

    3. MG

      I'm your ally, but you're my pal.

    4. AG

      [laughs]

    5. SP

      [laughs]

    6. MG

      Right?

    7. AG

      But what if I don't wanna be your pal? You know what's interesting about this is in the research I've read, normally not being on the same page is a risk factor for a relationship-

    8. MG

      Mm-hmm

    9. AG

      ... because we have different expectations. And then, like, you're, you're goofing around, and I'm kind of annoyed by it, and I'm too task-focused, and you're irritated by that.

    10. MG

      Mm-hmm.

    11. AG

      But here there's a complementarity, I think.

    12. MG

      Yeah. Well, that was one thing in the book actually that I had a question about, because my first instinct when I read about those three categories was to wonder about discrepancies. Because-

    13. AG

      Yeah

    14. MG

      ... I feel like in my own life- I enjoy relationships most when there is a discrepancy.

    15. AG

      Hmm.

    16. MG

      I find that really interesting, and what ends up happening is that you start to, the lines between those categories start to blur-

    17. AG

      Yeah

    18. MG

      ... if each person is bringing a different energy to the relationship.

    19. AG

      Yeah, I completely missed that in the book, and I think you're right. I think the kinds of discrepancies I was thinking about were different, which is, are we on the same page about what we are supposed to give and what the other person is supposed to receive?

    20. MG

      Hmm.

    21. AG

      And if we're not aligned on that, if I want you to be my ally and you're only my pal, that's a recipe for bad interactions and maybe some distrust brewing. But I like this idea that you're my ally and I'm your pal.

    22. MG

      And that's-

    23. AG

      That's fun. We can be pal-lies.

    24. MG

      [laughs]

  4. 6:32 – 9:12

    Fluid relationships over time: trajectories and parenting as a case study

    1. MG

      But also, these categories are, are fluid, right? That was the other question I had about those.

    2. AG

      Yeah.

    3. MG

      What's the trajectory? Is it that, do people naturally move from ally to pal to companion? Is that a kind of trajectory that people, it, that happens in relationships over time as people get closer?

    4. AG

      They think it's supposed to, but it doesn't have to. I think this is a misconception. You can be close on any of these wavelengths, and they don't go in any particular order. There's not a hierarchy of them. Some people meet and go right to companionship. They end up engaging in what's called a disruptive disclosure, where they just kinda share something about, "Here's a moment from my upbringing that shaped me." Some people become allies or pals and never go to companionship, and I call those people men.

    5. SP

      [laughs]

    6. MG

      Are these distinctions useful in understanding human development? So, a child, a baby is in a strictly transactional relationship, right? When they're born, they're just, they just want you to feed them and keep them warm. They're not giving anything back. Then, do you move a little bit into allies, where you have a, a shared goal to keep each, keep, you gotta keep the baby alive, the baby's gotta... And then you get to-

    7. AG

      [laughs]

    8. MG

      ... a little bit of, of, uh, wait, what's the next one?

    9. AG

      Is this what you thought about when [laughs] , when your daughters were born?

    10. MG

      No, I was just thinking... No.

    11. AG

      Like, like, "How do I be a good, good dad? Gotta keep the baby alive."

    12. MG

      No, no, no. No, no, no. No, no, no. No, no. I did not overthink this until right now.

    13. AG

      [laughs] Oh, so it's my fault. I'm sorry.

    14. MG

      It is, it is only your presence that causes me to overthink relationships in my life.

    15. AG

      [laughs] I take full responsibility for that.

    16. MG

      No. Like, we go through this, and then you end up in the place of, of, of, it's more than companionship, but I mean-

    17. AG

      Yeah

    18. MG

      ... there's clearly a point in your, I have young children now, so I think about this, in the trajectory of raising a child, in the beginning, it is just pure, like, they're just like, everything's about them, "Feed me, come running when I cry," blah, blah, blah. And then you watch their kind of relationship with you evolve over time.

    19. AG

      Yeah. Yeah. That's so interesting. I've never thought about this. I think that's right. I think what you haven't seen yet, 'cause your, your daughters are still little, is what happens when your kids start to become little adults. So as of last week, we have three teenagers-

    20. MG

      Oh my God

    21. AG

      ... which is a, which is a crazy thought. And I have watched some of our friends who have slightly older kids really struggle with the transition into being a parent to adult children. And what happens is, like, their kids are looking for, you know, kind of distant allies to respect their independence, and they're still stuck in full companion mode.

    22. MG

      Yeah.

    23. AG

      Or, in other cases, what I've seen is kids are actually looking for companionship, and the parents only know how to be pals, and so it's a constant letdown. And I think that's hard, and I think you're right. The fluidity is really important. And as a parent, getting on the same page with your kids about, "What do you need from me and how do I show up for you?" is a critical conversation to have.

  5. 9:12 – 11:42

    The energy cost of companionship: grief, boundaries, and enmeshment

    1. MG

      Yeah. The other thing that I thought about those three distinctions was there's very different levels of energy that are associated with those roles. So, companionship is a very kind of consuming, demanding, and it can be hard to be a constant companion to someone. Uh, the reason I thought of it, about this is that I have a friend who, a very cl- old and close friend of mine who lost a child recently. And I went to the funeral, and I saw him, and he was walking around, and he said something he'd never said to me. I've known him my whole life. He said, "Walk with me and tell me something that will distract me." He needed something in that moment from me that I'd never actually had to give him before.

    2. AG

      Wow.

    3. MG

      Right? We, although he's, I'm very, very, very close to him, our primary mode was we were pals in the greatest sense of that word. He's an incredibly brilliant... His mind is just delightful. You can hang out, you know. But in that moment, he needed something more. Now, I can't be in that mode with him. I don't think either of us wanna be in that mode-

    4. AG

      No

    5. MG

      ... o- other than in that crucial moment.

    6. AG

      Yeah.

    7. MG

      So I thought of, like, there is this sort of toggling that can take place, and we will eventually re- go back to our pal mode. But he needed something more.

    8. AG

      Yeah. I think you're right that companionship is often the most draining of the relationships, but it doesn't have to be. I think there's a huge difference between showing compassion for somebody else and crossing the line from empathy to what's called enmeshment-

    9. MG

      Right

    10. AG

      ... where you start to blur another person's needs and your own. And I, I think about this every time I hear somebody say, "I wanna be needed." And my first reaction is, "I don't think you understand what it's like to be needed. You do not wanna be needed by another human being. You wanna be valued." Because if someone needs you, that means they are totally dependent on you, and they expect you to drop everything whenever they have an issue. That's a recipe for an unbalanced, one-sided relationship, unless you're, you know, you're both suffering and creating [laughs] shared trauma together, which I would not necessarily wish on anyone.

    11. MG

      Mm-hmm.

    12. AG

      Um, I think what's much healthier is to say, "Look, let's set some boundaries around compassion. I don't have to feel your feelings to care about your feelings. I wanna maintain some distance so that I can show up for you when it doesn't cost me too much."

    13. MG

      Yeah, yeah. Um, can I go to my questions now?

    14. AG

      Oh, yeah. Sorry, I didn't mean to, uh, sidetrack you.

    15. MG

      No, no, no.

    16. AG

      You're in charge here, Malcolm.

    17. MG

      No, no.

    18. AG

      This is your show. This is your town. You have home court advantage. Go for it.

  6. 11:42 – 16:44

    Nerd identity: stigma, adolescence, and finding your people

    1. MG

      When you were a kid, this is gonna seem like a digression, but it's gonna circle back.

    2. AG

      I l- I love that preview.

    3. MG

      It's actually cr- it's crucial to the enterprise here. Uh, when you were a kid, you were a nerd.

    4. AG

      Were? Yeah, and I still am.

    5. MG

      Okay, good. That-

    6. AG

      That checks out, right?

    7. MG

      That was my second question.

    8. AG

      [laughs]

    9. MG

      Um, in your mind, what is the definition of a nerd?

    10. AG

      I think, uh, my favorite definition of a nerd [laughs] is that-

    11. MG

      By the way, only a nerd-

    12. AG

      Would have-

    13. MG

      ... a favorite definition of a nerd.

    14. SP

      [laughs]

    15. AG

      Well [laughs]

    16. MG

      There's a variety.

    17. AG

      [laughs]

    18. MG

      You've reviewed them all.

    19. AG

      [laughs]

    20. MG

      Looked at the evidence. And you've chosen number four.

    21. SP

      [laughs]

    22. MG

      What is... So what's the favorite one?

    23. AG

      Well, an, an, an ally of mine actually sent me once a Venn diagram that-

    24. MG

      Right

    25. AG

      ... broke this down, and if I can reconstruct it, it was very good. I think it had, like, intelligence, esoteric interests, and social skills. And a nerd has the first two, but not the third.

    26. MG

      [laughs]

    27. SP

      [laughs]

    28. MG

      Um, why does that word, nerd, have stigma in our society attached to it?

    29. AG

      I think because of the lack of social skills.

    30. MG

      Yeah, but intelligence and esoteric interests get trumped by social skills?

  7. 16:44 – 19:33

    A grand unified theory of Adam Grant’s books: ‘the nerd landscape’

    1. MG

      So I was thinking, you know, I like to do, what I like to do is to generate what, grand unified theories of things, and so I thought it would be really fun tonight to generate a grand unified theory of Adam Grant's work. Okay. So your first book was Give and Take.

    2. AG

      Right.

    3. MG

      Which was all about really the value that comes from helping others. And there's a, there's a reading of that which is the nerd says, "Don't bully me. It's p- possible for us to have a productive relationship."

    4. AG

      Ooh.

    5. MG

      Then you wrote a book called Originals, and I'll just read to you the subtitle: How Non-Conformists Move the World.

    6. SP

      [laughs]

    7. MG

      That's the nerd manifesto.

    8. AG

      [laughs]

    9. SP

      [laughs]

    10. MG

      Then, then you wrote a book called Think Again, right? The Power of Knowing What You Don't Know. That's the nerd asking to be reconsidered in the eyes of the world, right?

    11. AG

      It's also the nerd saying, "You don't know what you're talking about." [laughs]

    12. MG

      Exactly. Exactly. Then you wrote a book called Hidden Potential, which is what the nerd says to the, in the failed interaction with the girl at the age of 14. "I have potential. You can't see it yet."

    13. SP

      [laughs]

    14. MG

      "But just, just you wait till I'm 30."

    15. AG

      [laughs]

    16. SP

      [laughs]

    17. AG

      Yeah, I don't, I don't remember ever having that conversation.

    18. MG

      And now we have Vibe: The Secrets of Strong Connections in a Lonely World. Your world's lonely, Adam.

    19. AG

      Not anymore

    20. MG

      But your whole, I think of your work as, as just a serie- You're, you have delineated the kind of nerd landscape. In each of your works, you have articulated one of the central, and I think deeply important, dimensions of the nerd world, right?

    21. AG

      Yeah. I've, I've never seen this pattern before, and I now, I feel a little guilty that there are very few live long and prospers in my book, and, or in any of the books I've written. Like, I feel like I've under-referenced Star Trek.

    22. MG

      [laughs] You should just-

    23. AG

      Not fully serving the nerd audience

    24. MG

      [laughs] You should... But I would venture to say, so I was, then I was thinking, the other thing that's interesting about your work is that it's been enormously successful. You've struck a, a real chord with your audience, and I'm wondering, and we have the audience here, and I was wondering, well, how many of us are, who love your books, are nerds?

    25. AG

      Are we gonna poll the audience?

    26. MG

      Yes.

    27. AG

      Yeah, let's do it.

    28. MG

      Raise your hand.

    29. AG

      Can we get the house lights up a little? And if we relax the social skills part and just say intelligence plus having really intense interests in specific things, how many people would raise their hands then? Okay, that's more.

    30. MG

      That's more. So-

  8. 19:33 – 22:46

    Inside Adam’s mind and schedule: being a ‘human LLM’ and embracing inefficiency

    1. MG

      Oh. [audience cheering] One of the great delights of being your friend is I occasionally email you out of the blue, as I did several weeks ago, and I asked you an incredibly nerdy question. I wanted to have some insight as to why certain kinds of new ideas have difficulty gaining traction. Why does it take so long? It doesn't take long to come up with the new thing. It takes a long time to convince people to use the new thing. And you're like, five minutes pass, and then boom, in my inbox, it's like all these papers, which I read, and I was like, "This is brilliant. This is better than ChatGPT."

    2. AG

      [laughs]

    3. MG

      This is Adam at his absolute greatest. And it made me wonder, let's ta- I wanna t- I wanna, I wanna get a sense of how your mind w- works and how your day looks, 'cause I don't understand, how do you do all this?

    4. AG

      Well, they're, they're all part-time jobs, right?

    5. MG

      No. So walk me through a typical Adam day.

    6. AG

      Well, I wan- I wanna talk about your emails for a second because you send me the nerdiest questions of anyone I know, by far.

    7. MG

      I go to you because I know you have a certain kind of specialty that I'm very, very interested in.

    8. AG

      And sometimes you then are disappointed, [laughs] like, "Well, what, what are you doing as an organizational psychologist then-"

    9. MG

      Oh, I have-

    10. AG

      "... if you don't know this thing?"

    11. MG

      Oh, yeah. [laughs]

    12. AG

      You're, you-

    13. MG

      No, but I have you on a pedestal, and when you fail to live up to my lofty expectations, I get bummed out.

    14. AG

      Well, I, I'm glad to disappoint you from time to time. I, I think you, what you should know is that whenever you send me an email looking for an explanation or some data, it is the best procrastination in my day because it's way easier to solve other people's problems than it is your own.

    15. MG

      Yeah.

    16. AG

      And, like, how many times have you come up with a great title for somebody else's book but struggled to title your own? Having a little bit of distance from the problem gives you perspective that is missing when you're, you're in the weeds. And so, like, I, it just makes my day when you say, "Hey, how would you explain this thing?" And I'm like, "Aha." I can spend 10 minutes-

    17. MG

      Oh

    18. AG

      ... feeling useful-

    19. MG

      Yeah

    20. AG

      ... and having fun, and I'm gonna feel more productive in those 10 minutes than the rest of my week combined.

    21. MG

      Yeah. Wait, so how many-

    22. AG

      It's a gift

    23. MG

      ... people do use you the way I use you as a human LLM? Is this a, are, are there like 20 of us who are sending you these emails?

    24. AG

      There are probably a few hundred who show up with some regularity.

    25. MG

      Are you conscious of trying to live your life as efficiently as possible?

    26. AG

      I used to be, and I've actually tried to become less efficient because I think-

    27. MG

      What does that mean? In the Adam universe, what is less efficient mean?

    28. AG

      Well, I, I used to worry about wasting time, and I would think about like, "Oh, I had five minutes today that I could have spent more productively, and I could have either gotten something done or learned something or helped someone. Like, why am I not making the most of my time?" And I think I've, with the benefit of a little bit more life experience, realized usually my best ideas come when I'm actually not focused on getting anything done. And also, that's when some of my best interactions and relationships are built. And so I've just tried to be more patient about how my time is used.

    29. MG

      Do you compare yourself to your peers at work when it comes to productivity and-

    30. AG

      No.

  9. 22:46 – 28:31

    Work as modeling: what kids learn from watching (not hearing) parents

    1. MG

      Do your, your kids observe you working?

    2. AG

      They try not to.

    3. MG

      No, but I'm, I don't mean this in a-

    4. AG

      Yeah

    5. MG

      ... in a negative way, but what lessons do you think you're imparting to your kids with the way that you conduct your work life?

    6. AG

      I think, I hope my kids are learning three things from watching me work. The first is that, like, I treat flow states as precious. It's one of the reasons I run late for a lot of things, is when I get fully absorbed in a project or a task, I don't know when that's gonna happen again, and I don't wanna cut it off prematurely. And so they will see me, when I have an idea, disappear into my office for a couple hours. And I hope they're learning that it's possible to be intrinsically motivated at work. It's possible to love your job. I think that's an important lesson for kids to learn. Secondly, I think that they, I hope they see that I really love helping people and connecting people. And probably a third of the time that they wander into my office, when they ask me what I'm up to, I'll say, "Oh, like I just, I thought of two people who really need to know each other, and I'm checking with both of them to make sure that they're open to the introduction." Or, "Somebody sent me an email asking, can you make organizational psychology sense of this?" And this is the kind of problem that, that makes my day. And then third, I hope they're learning that work that's intrinsically motivating is not always fun moment to moment.

    7. MG

      Mm-hmm.

    8. AG

      Like, working on hard problems is sometimes really frustrating, and it's okay to experience the frustration and push through it.

    9. MG

      I ask that only because when I look back on my relationship with my father In retrospect, the single most important thing that he did to influence who I am is to work the way he did. He would go every morning -- He was a man not dissimilar to you in many ways. But he would get up every morning and he would go, he worked at home a lot, he would go into his study and he would just work solidly, take a break, have tea with my mom, work solidly. And it never seemed like drudgery.

    10. AG

      Yeah.

    11. MG

      You had to respect his time, and when it was over, it was over. Like it was, there was a point at which he stopped and went on, and I observed this my entire childhood, and it left an enormous impression on me.

    12. AG

      Wow.

    13. MG

      Like I, I, I feel his spirit when I'm working 'cause I saw that. And all the other things, the parenting things, I've forgotten all the other ones.

    14. AG

      I think this is one of the, the fundamental things that parents get wrong, is they think that kids are gonna be influenced by their words, but it's much more their actions that matter. And I think we all know this intuitively. We've heard that actions speak louder than words. I don't think that parents really stop to think about my kids are not going to follow what I say, they're gonna observe what I do, and you've got a choice between being a good role model and being a cycle that needs to be broken. Make the right choice.

    15. MG

      Yeah. Yeah.

    16. AG

      But I love that you learned that from your dad, and I can, I mean, I can see that spirit in the way that even you interact, right? Which is you, [laughs] you bring a certain whimsy and joy-

    17. MG

      Mm

    18. AG

      ... to exploring ideas that, like for me, when I was in college, you were one of the first people to legitimate intellectual curiosity outside of the classroom. Like I remember the tipping point coming out when, okay, this is gonna age you a little bit. I think it came out, like I think I was, I was finishing my freshman year of college, maybe starting sophomore year.

    19. MG

      Yeah.

    20. AG

      And all of a sudden it was cool to talk about ideas outside of class, and I mean, if your dad gave that to you, that is an extraordinary gift.

    21. MG

      Yeah.

    22. AG

      But it's also a great gift that you gave to me and so many other authors.

    23. MG

      Oh, that's very kind, Adam. [audience applauding]

    24. AG

      Why is it easier to connect with people when we're doing something together? When two acquaintances sit down face to face for a meal, it can be awkward. But put those same two people side by side on a walk or run, and they often slide into a natural rhythm of conversation. You're sharing an experience, and your bodies are quite literally moving in the same direction. That matters because connection isn't only something we create through words. It's something we build through synchrony. That's one of the things I love about Peloton. At first glance, a workout can look like an individual activity. You get on a bike or tread, put on your headphones, and start moving. But the experience can be remarkably social because you have an instructor encouraging you. You can see other people moving alongside you. There are high fives, leaderboards, shared milestones, and all of these little signals that remind you you're not alone. That's a powerful psychological shift. And the connection can go beyond that moment in class. When you keep showing up, you start noticing familiar names on the leaderboard. You recognize the people who gravitate toward the same instructors. Those little moments of recognition can turn into encouragement, online friendships, and sometimes even connections that carry into real life. That's what makes Peloton interesting is the bridge between exercising on your own and feeling connected to other people. You don't have to be in the same room to start building a sense of familiarity or belonging. I'm a big Peloton fan, and their new Tread Flex is designed to make movement easier to fit into your actual life. It's movable and foldable, so you can walk, run, or hike when you want to, and move it out of the way when you don't. It doesn't matter how big or how small your space is. You don't need a perfect home gym to make movement part of your life. You just need a little space and a reason to start. Movement doesn't have to be solitary. It can be a way of getting out of your own head, into your body, and in tune with others. Discover the Peloton community at onepeloton.com. [audience applauding]

    25. MG

      I wanna go back to something you said just a few moments ago.

    26. AG

      Notice how quickly he changes the subject. Malcolm does not like to be the center of attention.

    27. MG

      Since I'm getting a little uncomfortable, um, let's go back-- I wanna go back to something you said. So parents obsess too much about the things they say to their children and not, don't worry nearly enough about the example they're setting, right?

    28. AG

      Yeah.

    29. MG

      Their actions. This is an example of an idea, or this is an example of a way in which we are, uh, exercise lay psychology and are wrong, right?

    30. AG

      Yeah.

  10. 28:31 – 30:14

    Lay psychology myths: why frenemies can be worse than enemies

    1. MG

      And a lot of your work, in particular this book, is about exposing all the w- all the kind of psychological theories we have about everyday life that are incorrect, right? We're gonna briefly talk about the book. Pick your favorite, uh, misperception, psychological misperception from the book.

    2. AG

      Favorite? This is like choosing a favorite s- a favorite child.

    3. MG

      Doesn't have to be your favorite. Just pick one because-

    4. AG

      I'll give, I'll give you one.

    5. MG

      Okay.

    6. AG

      It's in vogue to talk about toxic relationships, and then to say, "Okay, that person is, is not healthy for me. I'm gonna cut them off and go no contact." And most people think that the people that you should distance yourself from are your greatest enemies, your adversaries, the people that you see only vices in. And empirically, that is not true. Even worse for your wellbeing and even your physical health than your enemies are your frenemies. People that you have ambivalent relationships with, this has been studied for decades by psychologists like Burt Uchino and Michele Duffy. What they show is if you have both positive and negative feelings about someone, if you appreciate their virtues, but you also can't stand their vices, you are experiencing higher blood pressure when you interact with that person. Uh, they are more likely to cause your heart rate to spike, and you even are more vulnerable to m- to cardiovascular disease if you have more ambivalent ties in your life. And I mean, that, that was just eye-opening for me to say, "You know what? Like I have felt that. I have felt that I don't know if this person is leaning in for a hug or if I should brace myself for a brawl." And constantly having to predict their behavior and manage, are we gonna like each other or are we gonna be at each other's throats? That is draining, and it's actually physically unhealthy, and so that, that's one of my favorites.

  11. 30:14 – 32:17

    Are we actually bad at intuition? Adam’s debate with Kahneman

    1. MG

      So we've now, you've now identified Two ideas that we hold about how to make sense of the world that are not true. Why are we such bad lay psychologists? Shouldn't we be good at that kinda thing? You're describing really, really core ... So the one, the example you just gave is an incredibly core notion about how to manage our friendship circles, our emotional lives, our psychological state, and you're saying that on this most fundamental of questions, who should you associate with or not associate, we're just, we're just wrong. Why would we be wrong?

    2. AG

      Well, I don't think we're bad intuitive psychologists. I actually think we are good on average, and what we study in psychology are often the outlier cases. I had a debate with Danny Kahneman about this. So s- some people have probably read Thinking Fast and Slow. Danny, he arguably was the greatest psychologist in history, the only one ever to win a Nobel Prize. And I had the, the great fortune of being mentored by him in probably the last decade of his life. And one day, Danny told me that he was skeptical of an article because the findings went against his intuition. And I said, "Danny, that's confirmation bias, which by the way, you helped to put on the map. Don't you think you should be questioning your assumptions?" And he said, "No, I think most human intuitions about behavior are right, and I think the burden of proof should be higher when a finding is counterintuitive."

    3. MG

      Mm-hmm.

    4. AG

      And I was really bothered by that, and the more I thought about it, the more I realized he was onto something because I think most of the time when, when we run studies in psychology, we support our intuitions, and that's why most of the findings in our academic journals are boring and obvious and predictable. But sometimes it's still helpful to gather evidence for them to confirm an intuition. But I think where, where my attention is really piqued is when rigorous, replicated, transparent studies by different labs come out with some findings that are surprising or unex- unexpected. They don't have to be counterintuitive. Sometimes they just have to be non-intuitive, and I think we should spend most of our time there because that's where we have the most to teach. But it doesn't mean we're bad at this in general.

  12. 32:17 – 36:19

    Dating compatibility: why algorithms fail and ‘similarity’ doesn’t sustain love

    1. MG

      But if I might gently push back, one of the reasons this is such an interesting book is it's full of all kinds of things that run counter to our intuitions. Let me give you another example, perhaps the most, what I thought was one of the most striking examples in the book. It's early on, and you're talking about dating and compatibil- romantic compatibility.

    2. AG

      Yep.

    3. MG

      And you point out that the notion that drives a lot of dating websites is completely unsupported by the evidence. In other words, if you try and match up people on the basis of shared interests or some other algorithmic compatibility, there's no evidence to suggest that's a good idea, right?

    4. AG

      At least when it comes to dating. The best available machine learning techniques, this is out of Eli Finkel's lab. What they do is they ask you to go on a series of speed dates, but before that, you filled out an exhaustive questionnaire. It's about 200 dimensions, every conceivable aspect of your personality to try to figure out what you're like and also everything you might want in a partner. And then they look at, okay, which combinations are good matches and which ones aren't? And it turns out the algorithm is a random walk. It does nothing. So all of the dating algorithms, all of the apps, all of the websites, they claim they're gonna match you up with your soulmate. They are lying to you or they're lying to themselves.

    5. MG

      Mm-hmm.

    6. AG

      There's no evidence that we can do this, and the reason for that is we have a broken model of what compatibility is. We think that compatibility is similarity between traits or maybe opposite traits, and so we think either birds of a feather will flock together or opposites will attract, and that is ultimately not true because it's not your separate traits that drive your interaction. It's the unique dynamic that evolves when the two of you meet. And so you can't predict what, [laughs] what, what people are gonna be like until you've actually seen them talk or do activities together, and yeah, I think you're right. I think that's a great example of our intuitive psychology is just wrong. But there are still some nuanced truths in that.

    7. MG

      Hmm.

    8. AG

      So when you look at the idea that, that similarity attracts, that is true. We do gravitate toward people who have the same personality traits as us, similar backgrounds to us. We even like interacting with people who smell similar to us. Yes, that is a research finding.

    9. MG

      Hmm.

    10. AG

      If someone's odor resembles yours, you get along with them better. But the question is what happens after the initial attraction, and at that point, similarity becomes irrelevant. It's not whether you're objectively similar that drives whether you maintain a bond or whether you get close. It's whether you feel similar to each other-

    11. MG

      Mm-hmm

    12. AG

      ... which is all about what you discover about each other and what you develop in each other. And so compatibility is not something we can gauge upfront. It's actually something we build over time.

    13. MG

      But if, Adam, if ... Let, let's pause on this 'cause it's a really important point, I think. How do ... W- Dating websites are a multi-billion dollar business. They are persisting on the basis of a, of a complete misapprehension about how dating works. How do they keep going? Is it just that you're cycling people through and no one ever figures out?

    14. AG

      Maybe. But I think what you did in Blink is you captured something that a lot of people wanna believe, which is you have a gut feeling or an intuition about other people that is often more reliable than your careful, rational analysis, and there are situations where that's true, and you wrote about them. People way overgeneralize how often that's true, and they're constantly relying on their first impressions of other people, which are frequently wrong. Let's take the, the famous Nalini Ambady studies, um, of thin slicing. It's really easy to tell when you watch a professor for 10 seconds, are they passionate? Are they enthusiastic? You can predict their teaching ratings. You know what you can't tell watching them for 10 seconds? Are they g- gonna be a good wife or a good husband?

    15. MG

      Hmm.

    16. AG

      Are they gonna be a great collaborator? Because you are just watching them perform in one narrow situation and one role. And I think we like to believe that when we get a narrow slice of one person, we can then generalize that to what they're like in all kinds of situations and interactions, and that is just not true.

  13. 36:19 – 38:27

    If Adam ran dating apps: reference-checked profiles and multi-context ‘tryouts’

    1. MG

      Yeah. So wait, if I made you America's dating czar and-

    2. AG

      [laughs] Not qualified.

    3. MG

      No, no, no, hold on. Hold on. And I put you in charge of the online business of helping people find a soulmate, what does it look like?

    4. AG

      Wow. I have never thought about this question before.

    5. MG

      You wrote a book called Vibe.

    6. AG

      [laughs]

    7. SP

      [laughs]

    8. MG

      Is there a way to fix the dating app, is what I'm saying?

    9. AG

      So yes, I would do a few things. First of all, you're not allowed to write your own profile. Other people who know you well-

    10. MG

      Oh, I like that

    11. AG

      ... get to submit anonymously descriptions of you.

    12. SP

      [laughs]

    13. MG

      Yeah. I like that.

    14. AG

      And what you do is you nominate three or four people that you trust, and then they get to enlist the other people that they think will be honest in seeing both your strengths and your shortcomings.

    15. MG

      Mm-hmm.

    16. AG

      So let's get the real profile. This is like doing a reference check as opposed to a job interview.

    17. MG

      Yeah.

    18. AG

      Let's begin there.

    19. MG

      With a reference check, okay.

    20. AG

      Okay, what else do we wanna do? I think the second thing you do then is you have to, before you decide whether you're a match or not, you have to interact with them in three different kinds of situations.

    21. MG

      Give me an example of a kind of situation.

    22. AG

      So you go to a haunted house together.

    23. MG

      A haunted house. How old are these people?

    24. SP

      [laughs]

    25. AG

      Come on. You, you read the book. You know there is evidence that if you go to a haunted house-

    26. MG

      Haunted house

    27. AG

      ... with people-

    28. MG

      Okay

    29. AG

      ... as long as you debrief it afterward, it accelerates your bond.

    30. MG

      Okay.

  14. 38:27 – 46:04

    Office romance, arranged marriage, and the limits of ‘choice’

    1. MG

      Those are all things that people do together when they're working together, and yet we have in recent years begun to frown on office romances. Is that really a dumb idea, office romance? Or-

    2. AG

      [laughs]

    3. MG

      ... is it a dumb idea to frown on office romances?

    4. AG

      [laughs]

    5. MG

      Because in of- we- you're essentially, you are, you're in an emotionally intense thing.

    6. AG

      [laughs]

    7. MG

      You solve problems together. You're doing s- the equivalent of a physical activity if you're work- what, so you're, you're crossing... This is how you meet people-

    8. AG

      [laughs]

    9. MG

      ... and know whether you like, and then we simultaneously say in this instance, "No, actually, you're not allowed to date the person you're working with." Why do we say that?

    10. AG

      Oh, I, I think we can go back to we have a problem with the behavior of some men who are responsible in positions of power-

    11. SP

      [laughs]

    12. AG

      ... for making women uncomfortable and abusing their power and causing harassment. And by the way, my, my read of the evidence on this, there is a powerful paper, paper on this by Jennifer Berdahl. It's called The Sexual Harassment of Uppity Women, and what she shows is this, sexual harassment is not predicted by attraction. It's predicted by feeling that a woman is a threat to your power as a man because she's strong and competent, and that just needs to stop.

    13. MG

      Yeah.

    14. SP

      [laughs]

    15. MG

      No, no, no one's, I don't think anyone's denying that office romances can go sideways. They can produce difficulty. They can be abuse. But what if that is the single best way to find someone who's, you're compatible with?

    16. AG

      I mean-

    17. MG

      Is it worth the risk?

    18. AG

      I don't know. I'd like to see better data on it. I, I worry a lot about office breakups and-

    19. MG

      Yeah

    20. AG

      ... the effect that that has on the dynamics in the office, and I don't know if the benefits are worth the costs. I know that Southwest Airlines used to encourage people to marry their coworkers, and that was when I started to wonder if they were becoming a cult.

    21. MG

      Yeah.

    22. SP

      [laughs]

    23. MG

      Another topic on this that I was wondering that whether you would bring up and didn't-

    24. AG

      [laughs]

    25. MG

      ... was arranged marriages.

    26. AG

      Oh.

    27. MG

      So if compatibility, standard metrics about compatibility are not terribly useful, and if a lot of our kind of-

    28. AG

      Oh, I see where you're going with this.

    29. MG

      And if what, what you w- the first thing that you said that you wanted was third parties to enter the fray-

    30. AG

      [laughs]

  15. 46:04 – 55:47

    Contrived identities vs. astrology—and ending with the ‘leaf raking party’ lesson

    1. MG

      You have a l- a, a lovely chapter in the book, one of my favorites, when you tell the story of how a principal goes to a school that was kind of broken and not working, and one of the ways he solves it is by, he divides up the school into houses, and each house has its own identity, and the kids coalesce around these identities, and the school starts to function once he's divided. And you talk about that.

    2. AG

      It's Hogwarts, basically.

    3. SP

      [laughs]

    4. MG

      Yeah. It's Hogwarts, and how a contrived sense of identity is actually really useful.

    5. AG

      Yeah.

    6. MG

      Okay? You agree with this?

    7. AG

      It can be. I don't think it should be used.

    8. MG

      Adam, yes or no, a contrived sense of identity can be very useful. Can.

    9. AG

      Begrudgingly, yes.

    10. MG

      Okay.

    11. AG

      Much worse than a meaningful identity, but go on.

    12. MG

      You are, have been known famously as a massive critic of astrology.

    13. AG

      Well, that's because it's made up.

    14. MG

      Oh, oh, oh, oh.

    15. SP

      [laughs]

    16. AG

      There's no science to support it whatsoever.

    17. MG

      That's because it's made up. You mean like the identity of the houses that works so well?

    18. AG

      Yes.

    19. SP

      [laughs]

    20. AG

      Yes.

    21. MG

      Adam-

    22. AG

      Yes, and this is why it bothers me

    23. MG

      ... it's the same, it's the same thing.

    24. AG

      I know. This is why people get duped by astrology.

    25. MG

      No. Wait a second.

    26. AG

      It's an arbitrary identity-

    27. MG

      You just-

    28. AG

      ... that they cling to

    29. MG

      ... it's, you just have a whole chapter in your book on the value of an arbitrary identity, and then there's a whole system that people have to essentially create houses.

    30. AG

      Oh. I'm a Virgo.

Episode duration: 55:47

Install uListen for AI-powered chat & search across the full episode — Get Full Transcript

Transcript of episode sJRwYDCkn5k

Get more out of YouTube videos.

Read along on your phone, search it beside the video, or ask your favorite AI app what was said.

iOSAndroidClaudeChromeChatGPTComing soon