
Alex Tabarrok - Prizes, Prices, and Public Goods
Alex Tabarrok (guest), Dwarkesh Patel (host), Alex Tabarrok (guest), Narrator
In this episode of Dwarkesh Podcast, featuring Alex Tabarrok and Dwarkesh Patel, Alex Tabarrok - Prizes, Prices, and Public Goods explores alex Tabarrok on Prizes, Public Goods, Baumol, and Better Government Alex Tabarrok discusses how better incentive design—especially prizes, advance market commitments, and dominant assurance contracts—can dramatically improve innovation and the provision of public goods, with COVID-19 vaccines as a central case study.
Alex Tabarrok on Prizes, Public Goods, Baumol, and Better Government
Alex Tabarrok discusses how better incentive design—especially prizes, advance market commitments, and dominant assurance contracts—can dramatically improve innovation and the provision of public goods, with COVID-19 vaccines as a central case study.
He explains Baumol’s cost disease and its implications for rising costs in education and healthcare, then explores how online education and AI tutors could turn education into a high‑productivity, scalable sector.
Tabarrok and host Dwarkesh Patel examine coordination and governance innovations (prediction‑market futarchy, blockchain governance, new public‑goods mechanisms) as potential ways to overcome inadequate equilibria.
They close with concern about US state capacity, arguing for an “innovation state” that can actually execute in crises, and advising young people to build complementary skills to technology and data.
Key Takeaways
Use large, well‑designed prizes and advance market commitments to accelerate critical innovations.
Firms underinvest in speed for socially vital innovations like vaccines because they face high failure risk and limited upside; big prizes, guaranteed purchase prices, and paying for at‑risk manufacturing can align private incentives with social needs.
Get the full analysis with uListen AI
Combine upfront manufacturing support with portfolio diversification in crises.
In pandemics, governments should fund multiple vaccine candidates and pay early for factory capacity, accepting some waste to massively reduce time‑to‑deployment and hedge against clinical failure (e. ...
Get the full analysis with uListen AI
Prizes and low‑friction, fast grants are underused tools where experts have stalled.
Prizes open the field to nontraditional actors and “crazies” who may not pass committee filters, while flexible grants like Howard Hughes and Fast Grants show that giving talented people money with fewer strings can yield outsized research returns.
Get the full analysis with uListen AI
Baumol’s cost disease reframes why healthcare and education get more expensive.
As some sectors (tech, manufacturing) become much more productive, wages rise economy‑wide, making labor‑intensive, slower‑productivity sectors look costlier—even if nothing “goes wrong” there; higher prices partly reflect overall progress, not just dysfunction.
Get the full analysis with uListen AI
Online education and AI can convert teaching into a scalable, high‑productivity sector.
Top instructors can reach hundreds of thousands of students globally via video and AI tutors, reducing the need for many marginal teachers while expanding roles for coaching, tutoring, and guidance; institutions with strong brands (e. ...
Get the full analysis with uListen AI
Dominant assurance contracts can greatly improve voluntary funding of public goods.
By refunding contributors with a bonus if a funding threshold is not met, these mechanisms make contributing a dominant strategy, empirically doubling project success rates in lab experiments compared to standard assurance contracts like Kickstarter.
Get the full analysis with uListen AI
The U.S. needs “state capacity libertarianism” and an innovation‑focused state.
Tabarrok argues for a smaller but more competent government that can execute in emergencies—unlike the CDC/FDA failures during COVID—and for shifting resources from “warfare/welfare” toward R&D and innovation, spurred in part by external competition from countries like China.
Get the full analysis with uListen AI
Notable Quotes
“Now is the time to throw money at the problem.”
— Alex Tabarrok
“I want a small government. But I want a government to be able to do what it's supposed to do at the time it's supposed to do it.”
— Alex Tabarrok
“Prizes are particularly good when the experts have run against the wall and you need to get the crazies in.”
— Alex Tabarrok
“Whoever cracks [scalable online education] is going to do incredibly well because you go from one person teaching 30 students at a time to literally you could teach the entire world.”
— Alex Tabarrok
“This solves the public good problem… Paul Samuelson said this problem was impossible to solve.”
— Alex Tabarrok (on dominant assurance contracts)
Questions Answered in This Episode
How large and broad should innovation prizes be during a pandemic to effectively align private incentives without creating massive waste or corruption?
Alex Tabarrok discusses how better incentive design—especially prizes, advance market commitments, and dominant assurance contracts—can dramatically improve innovation and the provision of public goods, with COVID-19 vaccines as a central case study.
Get the full analysis with uListen AI
In which domains beyond vaccines and COVID should governments and philanthropists systematically replace grants with prizes or fast grants, and how would that change research culture?
He explains Baumol’s cost disease and its implications for rising costs in education and healthcare, then explores how online education and AI tutors could turn education into a high‑productivity, scalable sector.
Get the full analysis with uListen AI
If Baumol’s cost disease is largely driven by success in progressive sectors, which policy levers (if any) make sense to control healthcare and education costs without stifling broader productivity growth?
Tabarrok and host Dwarkesh Patel examine coordination and governance innovations (prediction‑market futarchy, blockchain governance, new public‑goods mechanisms) as potential ways to overcome inadequate equilibria.
Get the full analysis with uListen AI
What concrete institutional changes would be required to turn U.S. government into the kind of high‑capacity “innovation state” Tabarrok advocates?
They close with concern about US state capacity, arguing for an “innovation state” that can actually execute in crises, and advising young people to build complementary skills to technology and data.
Get the full analysis with uListen AI
How might mechanisms like dominant assurance contracts, futarchy, and blockchain‑based governance realistically be tested at scale in the offline world, not just in online or lab environments?
Get the full analysis with uListen AI
Transcript Preview
Look, I want a small government. But I want a government to be able to do what it's supposed to do at the time it's supposed to do it.
(instrumental music) Okay. Today, I have the pleasure of speaking with Professor Alex Tabarrok, who's the Bartley J. Madden Chair of Economics at the Mercatus Center, and a professor of economics at George Mason University, and of course, he's the co-author of the popular Marginal Revolution blog with Professor Tyler Cowen, who I've also had the pleasure of talking on with the podcast. So, uh, Professor, thank you for coming on the podcast.
Yeah. It's great to be here.
Awesome. Okay, so the... Uh, first, I want to ask you about, uh, the Grand Innovation Prize. Can you explain what this is? And I'd like to ask you some more questions about it.
Sure. I mean, the basic issue is, is that clearly speed really matters at this point in time in the midst of the pandemic. We're already been too slow. We've been behind the virus every single step of the way. So we want to find a way of, uh, speeding up the incentives to produce a vaccine or a diagnostic or a therapeutic. And you might say, "Well, you know, don't the companies, for example, already have an incentive to, uh, be quick?" And to some extent they do, but not as much as we would like from social incentives. So think, for example, about a, uh, vaccine manufacturer. Uh, typically, most vaccines fail. Right? They're hard to produce, they're complex, and most of them fail. And what this means is that a vaccine manufacturer, they're not gonna be willing to build a factory, to ramp up a factory, to get the doses flowing, right, until the vaccine has been proven safe and effective and i- it's gonna be approved. Okay? So they're not gonna start moving really until the vaccine is approved. So if you want them to move faster, you've gotta give them bigger incentives, and there's a variety of ways of doing that. One is to have like a big prize, you know, a billion dollars to the first, uh, vaccine which meets a set of criteria, you know, it's effective at, you know, 60%, 70%, has such and such safety criteria and so forth. Or, um, you could, uh, pay directly, um, for, uh, manufacturing costs. In order to, uh, get the... a firm to build the factory, you can say, "Okay, we're gonna, uh, pay some of your costs." And there's pluses and minuses, but the basic idea of a prize or advance market commitment or advance market pursh- purchase or paying for at-risk capacity is the firms don't have as strong an incentive to ramp up the vaccine quickly as we would like, so we wanna give them some extra juice.
Gotcha. And then the- the incentive is even weaker because you can only sell somebody a vaccine once, if it works at least, right? Uh, yeah. Um, okay. So I- I have a question about, um, how- how do you get money to the people... I guess you could give grants for manufacturing, but if somebody has a great idea for creating a vaccine, they... there's a billion dollar prize for making that vaccine, uh, but they don't have the initial funding to, you know, get that manufacturing or even testing up to par. Um, what do you do about that?
Install uListen to search the full transcript and get AI-powered insights
Get Full TranscriptGet more from every podcast
AI summaries, searchable transcripts, and fact-checking. Free forever.
Add to Chrome