Evolution's Secrets To Understanding Relationships - Dr Andrew Thomas

Evolution's Secrets To Understanding Relationships - Dr Andrew Thomas

Modern WisdomMar 13, 20231h 35m

Dr Andrew Thomas (guest), Chris Williamson (host)

Evolutionary mismatch between Stone Age mating psychology and modern dating environmentsError management theory, sexual over‑perception, and commitment skepticism in men and womenParental investment, sex differences, and short‑term vs long‑term sexual strategiesSociosexuality, promiscuity, mate switching, and heritability of sexual behaviorSex ratios, strategic pluralism, and how ecology shifts mating strategiesSexual harassment, token resistance, ‘playing hard to get,’ and miscommunicationBody count norms, polygyny vs polyandry, and what traits truly predict relationship success

In this episode of Modern Wisdom, featuring Dr Andrew Thomas and Chris Williamson, Evolution's Secrets To Understanding Relationships - Dr Andrew Thomas explores evolutionary Psychology Reveals Hidden Forces Driving Modern Relationships And Dating Dr. Andrew Thomas explains five core evolutionary theories—evolutionary mismatch, error management, parental investment, sexual strategies, and strategic pluralism—to illuminate why modern dating and relationships often feel confusing or painful.

Evolutionary Psychology Reveals Hidden Forces Driving Modern Relationships And Dating

Dr. Andrew Thomas explains five core evolutionary theories—evolutionary mismatch, error management, parental investment, sexual strategies, and strategic pluralism—to illuminate why modern dating and relationships often feel confusing or painful.

He shows how ancestral mating psychology collides with online dating, porn, abundance of choice, and shifting social norms, producing phenomena like height filters, ghosting, misread signals, and sexlessness among young men.

The conversation also covers sociosexuality, promiscuity, infidelity, polygyny, sexual harassment, token resistance and ‘playing hard to get,’ plus what actually predicts long‑term relationship success.

Thomas contrasts internet myths (e.g., body count double standards, women loving polygyny, AI dating advice) with empirical data, and offers practical suggestions: choose contexts wisely, lean on friends/family introductions, and value traits like kindness and a pleasing disposition.

Key Takeaways

Modern dating overloads Stone Age brains, pushing people into crude filters.

Ancestrally, you might have had a handful of potential partners; online you see thousands, so people default to one‑dimensional criteria (height, race, profession) or swipe based on a single photo, which distorts mate choice.

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

Men and women evolved to make different ‘safer’ errors in courtship.

Error management theory predicts men often over‑perceive sexual interest (better to risk rejection than miss a chance), while women underestimate male commitment (better to be too skeptical than be abandoned with a child).

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

Short‑term and long‑term mating are distinct strategies triggered by context.

People aren’t fixed as ‘casual’ or ‘committed’—ecology, danger, welfare systems, and arousal can temporarily shift them toward short‑term hookups or long‑term pair‑bonding, even within the same person.

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

Sociosexuality strongly predicts both harassment risk and infidelity motives.

High sociosexual desire (comfort with casual sex) is one of the strongest predictors of sexually pushy behavior and cheating; for women, infidelity is more often tied to seeking a better long‑term partner, while men’s affairs can be purely for sexual novelty.

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

Key relationship traits are kindness and ‘pleasing disposition,’ not just looks or money.

Decades of ranking studies show people consistently put dependable character, kindness, and being easy to live with above physical attractiveness and income when forced to prioritize for long‑term partners.

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

Body count matters in a nuanced, U‑shaped way—not via simple double standards.

Both sexes rate a partner with roughly 3–4 prior partners as most attractive for long‑term relationships; very low (virgin) and very high counts are seen as riskier for different reasons, and personal attitudes show little evidence of the classic ‘men praised, women shamed’ double standard.

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

Where and how you meet partners shapes outcomes more than people realize.

Meeting via friends, family, work, hobbies, or speed‑dating embeds you in overlapping social networks, reduces ghosting and predatory behavior, and lets qualities like warmth, humor, and political tolerance show—advantages online apps largely erase.

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

Notable Quotes

For most modern problems, we're approaching them with a Stone Age brain.

Dr. Andrew Thomas

Short‑term relationships are about sex… you strip away the courting process, the commitment, the getting to know a person.

Dr. Andrew Thomas

A pleasing disposition—someone who's just nice to be around—is like the most important thing in the whole world ten years into a relationship.

Dr. Andrew Thomas

A lot of suffering in the dating world comes from conflating short‑term and long‑term mating desires.

Dr. Andrew Thomas

If you want a long‑term relationship, go to places where people aren’t going there for a short‑term relationship.

Dr. Andrew Thomas

Questions Answered in This Episode

How can individuals practically counteract evolutionary mismatches—like choice overload and porn cues—when using modern dating platforms?

Dr. ...

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

What specific behaviors or signals help distinguish genuine long‑term intent from short‑term strategy in early dating?

He shows how ancestral mating psychology collides with online dating, porn, abundance of choice, and shifting social norms, producing phenomena like height filters, ghosting, misread signals, and sexlessness among young men.

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

Given the strong role of sociosexuality, should people explicitly screen for it (e.g., by asking about past relationships) when choosing partners?

The conversation also covers sociosexuality, promiscuity, infidelity, polygyny, sexual harassment, token resistance and ‘playing hard to get,’ plus what actually predicts long‑term relationship success.

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

How might parents and educators realistically teach flirting, boundaries, and consent so that harassment born of ‘misunderstanding’ is reduced?

Thomas contrasts internet myths (e. ...

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

If AI systems like ChatGPT misrepresent sex differences and mate preferences, how might that warp dating advice and cultural narratives over time?

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

Transcript Preview

Dr Andrew Thomas

If you think about how ludicrous it is that there's a 2D image in front of you that you can put your hand on, that you can look around the side of a monitor and it's clearly not real, but it's enough to trick our ancestral mating systems into thinking sex is about to happen, enough to arouse us. So, of course, your psychology is gonna be lined up with that. Sex is available, I am now aroused, I want the sex. I don't want to entertain a long-term relationship with an extended courting process before I have it.

Chris Williamson

I absolutely love your writing, man. Your Psychology Today articles are fantastic. Congratulations.

Dr Andrew Thomas

Oh, brilliant. And am, am I right in thinking, um, I'm the first Welsh person you've had on your show? I've heard that. That was the rumor.

Chris Williamson

Oh, that would be a very interesting start. I don't know. Um, sometimes people are, like, secret Welsh, secret Welshies, you know?

Dr Andrew Thomas

Yes, yeah. I'll have to just... Let's just transition that to a ruggedly handsome Welsh person.

Chris Williamson

Sure. Abs- yeah, ab-

Dr Andrew Thomas

I'm sure that's, that's a first.

Chris Williamson

Complete win, as far as I'm concerned.

Dr Andrew Thomas

Yep, absolutely.

Chris Williamson

And also the first openly Welsh person.

Dr Andrew Thomas

(laughs)

Chris Williamson

We can definitely take that. You didn't use to identify as Welsh and now identify as something else. You're openly Welsh.

Dr Andrew Thomas

Yeah, uh, y- (laughs) I don't think the identity politics has hit, uh, Welsh identity yet.

Chris Williamson

(laughs)

Dr Andrew Thomas

Uh, give it, give it a little bit longer, but... Mm.

Chris Williamson

(laughs) It's com- it's coming for you soon. Hold on tight. Uh, so you just wrote this great article explaining five evolutionary theories that everyone should know to understand how relationships work.

Dr Andrew Thomas

Yeah.

Chris Williamson

Evolutionary mismatch. What's that?

Dr Andrew Thomas

So, evolutionary mi- mismatch is this idea that, um, our psychology evolved, um, you know, and has remained relatively stable over the last 100,000 years. So, it's this idea that society has moved quicker than our biology has been able to cope with it. So, for most modern problems, we're approaching them with a, a s- a Stone Age brain. Um, and yeah, it's something which in my, uh, my teaching at Swansea, I try to apply that quite a bit to, to mating 'cause a lot of stuff that we have in the, in the modern environment is just something that, um, it makes more sense when you sort of figure out that your brain is trying to cope with it (laughs) rather than being able to master it because it's such a novel, novel thing that it's not used to.

Chris Williamson

What would be an example of that?

Dr Andrew Thomas

So, I think a really good... The, the best example of that is just sheer choice overload, right? So, if you think about, uh, ancestral human populations, there's some debate over the number, but, um, you know, Dunbar's number is, like, 150 people. Um, nowadays, we have access to almost limited- limitless numbers of people. Um, it leads to a lot more superficial relationships. Um, when... And I, and I mean like friends and family, uh, but also when you go online onto dating websites, it looks like there's this unlimited pool of potential options. Um, and that leads to all sorts of crazy things like, um, people having to use sort of one characteristic to narrow down the playing field. So, dating, I, I think, has become a lot more univariate rather than multivariate. So, historically, you'd meet up with someone and you see the whole person, you take in their physical attractiveness, you also take in other things about them. Um, and nowadays, p- we don't even get to that point where we can make a holistic judgment because we're doing things like, "Oh, they're not six foot, so, uh, that, that's it. They're off the radar." Um, I always like to... It, it's really interesting, actually, so some of, some of the research that I've done with, um, uh, Peter Jonassen has actually shown how people then kind of compensate with that because we have, we're, we're gonna publish this stuff on height, but if you get the, the dating website data, it's really interesting and you plot up what guys' heights are, you get this really weird distribution where it's a normal distribution until you hit 5'10", 5'11" and six foot, in which case it drops on all of those, and then suddenly you get this big influx of everyone saying they're six foot. Um, and embarrassingly, I was one of those liars, right? So, I met wi- my wife on an online dating website. Now, I always tell people I'm six foot minus one. Um, so I put that I was six foot on this dating website and that got me past the bar, and now I'm happily married, and if I-

Install uListen to search the full transcript and get AI-powered insights

Get Full Transcript

Get more from every podcast

AI summaries, searchable transcripts, and fact-checking. Free forever.

Add to Chrome