The Female Orgasm, CrossFit & Vasectomies - Zack Telander | Modern Wisdom Podcast 384

... what's the one thing that men face, is ability to get it up, and then the thought process of trying to get it up makes it worse. "Don't think about it. Babe, don't think about it, it'll just happen. Okay, you don't want me to think about it? Now, now I'm going to start getting it up."

Now all I can do is think about it.

Right? So it's kind of the same thing. If a woman wants to have an orgasm, and you, and like, that's all they're thinking about, and then they think, "Oh, crap, well, I'm not, it's not happening."

"Am I doing it right? Is it happening right?"

Yeah.

"Is he enjoying it? Am I enjoying it? Should I be doing this?"

Yes, yes. And so-

That's such a good analogy. (whooshing sound) Zachy boy, welcome back.

Thanks for having me back. I'm excited.

Sooner than we planned, man.

Yeah, but it's, it feels right.

Too much to talk about. Right, so here's the first thing I want to talk about. Chris Rabb from Philadelphia, he has created a bill requiring men to get vasectomies by age 40. State Representative Chris Rabb, a Philadelphia Democrat, supports a solution to lawmaking men who want to control policy on women's and girls' bodies require, requiring men by six weeks into age 40, or after child three, to get vasectomies. And it's all in the name of reproductive rights for women and girls. Rabb also wrote the legislation which was in a response to restrictive abortion bills around the US. "I thought it was as important as a man to speak up about reproductive rights," Rabb said, according to WHPTV. There are bills and laws that regulate and restrict bodily autonomy for women and girls, but not so much for men. While the legislation is satirical, it's supposed to add conversation on reproductive rights. In the statement, Rabb said, "As long as the state legislature continues to restrict the reproductive rights of cis men, uh, cis women, trans men, and non-binary people, there should be laws to address the responsibility of men who impregnate them." That's obviously beside the law of having to look after the child and pay child support for the first 18 years of its life. "My sincere hope in introducing this legislation is that my colleagues in the General Assembly consider the egregiously gendered double standard when it comes to curtailing reproductive healthcare as it applies to women." Reproduc-, uh, Republicans reportedly responded with abortion and vasectomies not being equal issues, and argued the bill conversation won't get very far. What do you think about that?

So the, the main thing that I heard from, and, and what I want to talk about is the satirical aspect of it. So like, it was knowingly satirical, right, when he did it. He, so he himself knows that it's not ever going to get passed and it's not real. So what I'm wondering is, what is the efficacy of like an extreme satirical play like that to get conversation started? Well ultimately, right, like to, to get people thinking about, you know, the other side of it, which is the, um, abortion laws that are being passed. It's, it's very interesting. Obviously it's ridiculous, right? He even knows it's ridiculous, um, but I, that's what I'm, I'm wondering is like, how, how effective is satire in bringing about conversation? And I would say it's decently effective, right? You have, um...