
Why Science Says Men & Women Will Never Be The Same - David Geary
David Geary (guest), Chris Williamson (host)
In this episode of Modern Wisdom, featuring David Geary and Chris Williamson, Why Science Says Men & Women Will Never Be The Same - David Geary explores why Biology, Not Culture Alone, Drives Deep Sex Differences Today David Geary and Chris Williamson explore the biological roots of sex differences in cognition, interests, and behavior, and how these play out in modern societies. They discuss the “gender equality paradox,” where richer, more egalitarian countries actually see larger sex differences in STEM participation and personality. The conversation connects brain organization, hormones, and evolved roles to contemporary issues like male educational decline, the ‘sedation’ of disengaged men, and the rapid rise in adolescent transgender identification, especially among girls. Geary argues that denying sex differences distorts policy, data interpretation, and how we understand current social crises.
Why Biology, Not Culture Alone, Drives Deep Sex Differences Today
David Geary and Chris Williamson explore the biological roots of sex differences in cognition, interests, and behavior, and how these play out in modern societies. They discuss the “gender equality paradox,” where richer, more egalitarian countries actually see larger sex differences in STEM participation and personality. The conversation connects brain organization, hormones, and evolved roles to contemporary issues like male educational decline, the ‘sedation’ of disengaged men, and the rapid rise in adolescent transgender identification, especially among girls. Geary argues that denying sex differences distorts policy, data interpretation, and how we understand current social crises.
Key Takeaways
Sex differences in brain organization are large, measurable, and emerge early.
MRI work shows you can predict a 10‑year‑old’s sex from brain patterns with about 93% accuracy, and spontaneous brain-activity differences appear prenatally and in early infancy—undermining claims that all differences are purely socialization.
Get the full analysis with uListen AI
Greater societal gender equality often magnifies—not shrinks—sex differences.
In more prosperous, gender-equal nations, fewer women choose inorganic STEM fields and personality and cognitive sex differences increase, likely because people are freer to follow their intrinsic preferences and comparative advantages.
Get the full analysis with uListen AI
Interest and comparative advantage, not raw ability, shape women’s lower STEM representation.
Girls worldwide tend to be relatively stronger at reading, even when their math and science are high; rationally, many choose reading-heavy fields, widening sex gaps in certain STEM domains as opportunities expand.
Get the full analysis with uListen AI
Boys and men are increasingly failing in education and work, creating a latent social risk.
Women now out-complete men in college by about 60/40, millions of prime‑age men are not in education, employment, or training, and many spend thousands of hours on screens subsidized by benefits or parents—leaving them sedated but potentially volatile if supports collapse.
Get the full analysis with uListen AI
Male and female ‘folk physics’ and ‘folk psychology’ reflect evolved specializations.
Males tend to excel in spatial skills, navigation, tracking trajectories, and throwing; females tend to excel in reading faces, theory of mind, verbal nuance, and dyadic relationship management—suites of traits that map onto ancestral hunting/warfare vs. ...
Get the full analysis with uListen AI
Physical and cognitive sex differences both grow as populations become healthier.
As countries get wealthier and health improves, male–female height gaps increase, and early evidence suggests associated increases in sex differences in spatial and certain memory abilities, implying that better environments allow biological potentials to fully express.
Get the full analysis with uListen AI
The recent surge in transgender-identifying youth, especially girls, likely reflects social contagion on top of a small biologically rooted minority.
Historically, genuine childhood gender dysphoria was rare, more common in males, and linked to lifelong cross‑sex behavior; today’s rapid, female‑skewed spikes, peer clusters, and high detransition rates suggest social media–driven contagion that particularly exploits girls’ evolved sensitivity to group inclusion.
Get the full analysis with uListen AI
Notable Quotes
“You can take a brain pattern of a 10‑year‑old and predict whether that brain belongs to a boy or a girl about 93% of the time.”
— David Geary
“As countries became more gender equal, there was proportionately fewer women going into these inorganic sciences.”
— David Geary
“The physical sex differences get bigger because the overall health of the population gets better.”
— David Geary
“Girls and women do really well at one‑on‑one kind of emotional intelligence… probably about 85% of them are better than the average guy.”
— David Geary
“It’s basically they’re being paid off to be quiet and just deal with their situation.”
— David Geary
Questions Answered in This Episode
If sex differences become more pronounced in freer, wealthier societies, how should policymakers rethink targets for equal outcomes in fields like STEM?
David Geary and Chris Williamson explore the biological roots of sex differences in cognition, interests, and behavior, and how these play out in modern societies. ...
Get the full analysis with uListen AI
What would an education system look like that takes male and female cognitive and motivational differences seriously without stereotyping individuals?
Get the full analysis with uListen AI
How can societies address the ‘sedated’ cohort of disengaged men before economic shocks remove their safety nets and trigger instability?
Get the full analysis with uListen AI
Where should the ethical line be drawn on medical transition for adolescents, given the mix of genuine dysphoria and apparent social contagion?
Get the full analysis with uListen AI
How can we talk honestly about robust sex differences in public without fueling discrimination or undermining support for atypical individuals?
Get the full analysis with uListen AI
Transcript Preview
You can take a brain pattern of a 10-year-old and predict whether that brain belongs to a boy or a girl about 93% of the time, almost as good as you can by looking at an adult face of a male or female. So, huge difference.
Why do you think the discussion about sex differences between men and women has become so hotly contested recently?
Yeah. Great, great question. I, I, I think it's always been hotly contested to some extent. Um, it just kind of, uh, flares up and then down, uh, just depending on, um, conditions. I, I, I think the, the, one of the main drivers is there are, um, many individuals who don't wanna believe that there's biological basis to anything, and if there's a biological basis to anything, it- it's gonna show up in- in sex differences. And there are, um, gender activists who don't wanna believe that there are differences between men and women that have a biological basis to them, and therefore, they don't wanna consider that those potential differences contribute to socially important outcomes, like the percentage of males in computer science or engineering or, you know, teaching or whatever it might be. And so-
You, you did a bunch of research, right, looking at STEM, uh, and seeing what it was that contributed to, uh, women's lower participation in STEM subjects.
Right. Yeah, so, so we looked at, um, we- we've looked at a variety of, uh, sex differences in, in a number of things and- and one, um, 2018 study, we looked at the, um, proportion of women, college students, who were getting degrees in inorganic sciences. So, computer science, engineering, physics and so forth. And, um, we plotted that against things like, um, gender equality, which is, uh, would be... A high gender equal country would be one that... Uh, that they tend to be generally pretty wealthy, liberal, um, there's high levels of, um, female participation in the labor force, there's women in Parliament or Congress or whatever, um, it might be, a lot of women in higher ed and so forth. So, the standard argument has been, for the last, uh, four or five decades is that as countries approach that type of, um, wealth and, uh, liberal openness, that basic psychological, cognitive and other sex differences will begin to disappear. Um, so, so we looked at that generally. We looked across countries and we found the exact opposite of that, that as countries became more gender equal, there was proportionately fewer women going into these inorganic sciences. They were going into, uh, other areas, um, presumably. So, the gap in these, um, these particular STEM fields actually increased as societies became more open to women participating in a variety of, kind of, cultural endeavors.
Have you got any idea whether this is due to interests or abilities?
Right. Probab- probably a coup- a couple of different things. Um, interest for sure. Um, there are sex differences in, um, interest in science generally, and there are sex differences in particularly interest in, uh, mechanical, um, types of things, how, how inorganic things work. Um, in terms of abilities, the, probably one of the primary movers is intra-individual strength. So, if you're inter-... And so, what, what are you best at? Reading or math or reading or science or whatever it might be? And throughout the world, girls are generally, their best subject is generally reading, meaning that their comparative advantage is in fields that are more reading heavy than math or science heavy. Even if their overall levels of, uh, math and science are high, or even higher than boys, um, if their strength is reading, they're still more likely to go into other fields, uh, than, than STEM related.
Install uListen to search the full transcript and get AI-powered insights
Get Full TranscriptGet more from every podcast
AI summaries, searchable transcripts, and fact-checking. Free forever.
Add to Chrome