Paul Brunson: "The 70/30 Body Shape Is Scientifically The Most Sexy" & THIS Predicts Divorce!

Paul Brunson: "The 70/30 Body Shape Is Scientifically The Most Sexy" & THIS Predicts Divorce!

The Diary of a CEOFeb 1, 20242h 11m

Paul C. Brunson (guest), Steven Bartlett (host), Narrator

Historical evolution of relationships and modern expectations of partnersArranged marriage, choice overload, and why satisfaction is often higherMate value, golden mean body ratios, and attraction scienceSelf-esteem, flourishing, and preparing yourself before partneringMen’s struggles, dating apps, rejection, and the ‘premium effect’Attachment styles, sex, and how trauma shapes desireRed flags: narcissism, dark tetrad traits, and Gottman’s Four Horsemen

In this episode of The Diary of a CEO, featuring Paul C. Brunson and Steven Bartlett, Paul Brunson: "The 70/30 Body Shape Is Scientifically The Most Sexy" & THIS Predicts Divorce! explores science Of Love: Choosing Partners, Beating Narcissists, Predicting Divorce Risks Paul C. Brunson, described as the world’s most influential matchmaker, unpacks decades of relationship science, his access to Tinder’s global data, and why partner choice is a literal life-or-death decision. He traces the evolution of relationships from survival-driven pairings to today’s self-actualization-focused partnerships, explaining why dating now feels more complex than ever. Brunson argues that many people are unsatisfied because they pick the wrong partners for the wrong reasons, overlook their own wellbeing, and underestimate the work required after the ‘happily ever after’ moment. He offers concrete frameworks—mate value, sex ratio, Carol Ryff’s wellbeing dimensions, attachment theory, Gottman’s Four Horsemen—to help people choose better partners, avoid narcissists, and build enduring, fulfilling relationships.

Science Of Love: Choosing Partners, Beating Narcissists, Predicting Divorce Risks

Paul C. Brunson, described as the world’s most influential matchmaker, unpacks decades of relationship science, his access to Tinder’s global data, and why partner choice is a literal life-or-death decision. He traces the evolution of relationships from survival-driven pairings to today’s self-actualization-focused partnerships, explaining why dating now feels more complex than ever. Brunson argues that many people are unsatisfied because they pick the wrong partners for the wrong reasons, overlook their own wellbeing, and underestimate the work required after the ‘happily ever after’ moment. He offers concrete frameworks—mate value, sex ratio, Carol Ryff’s wellbeing dimensions, attachment theory, Gottman’s Four Horsemen—to help people choose better partners, avoid narcissists, and build enduring, fulfilling relationships.

Key Takeaways

Who you choose as a partner is arguably the most important decision of your life.

Brunson echoes Sheryl Sandberg and Warren Buffett in arguing that partner choice outranks career decisions for impact on happiness, health, longevity, and even earning potential. ...

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

Most breakups stem from choosing the wrong partner and failing at conflict resolution, not just money or infidelity.

Commonly cited causes of breakups—finance, cheating—are often surface-level symptoms. ...

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

You need to flourish on your own before expecting a relationship to make you happy.

Ten years of research led Brunson to conclude that entering a relationship with high life satisfaction is the strongest predictor of satisfaction within the relationship. ...

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

Arranged marriages highlight the power of community input and clear priorities.

Data shows arranged marriages, on average, last longer and report higher satisfaction, despite many moral issues in some contexts. ...

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

Most people pick partners based on superficial criteria that barely correlate with long-term happiness.

Brunson dismantles common checklists (height, income, race, looks) and shows, via a live example with a friend’s criteria, how they can yield a <0. ...

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

Self-esteem quietly governs who we choose, how we date, and how picky we are about looks.

Higher self-esteem reduces the need for external validation and conformity. ...

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

Narcissists and dark tetrad personalities are highly attractive short-term but catastrophically bad long-term bets.

Narcissists and psychopaths perform best in speed-dating research due to confidence, charm, and their willingness to lie. ...

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

Notable Quotes

The number one reason for breakups is not finance, not infidelity. It’s that we pick bad partners.

Paul C. Brunson

Who you choose as a partner is the most important decision you could make in life. It’s literally life or death.

Paul C. Brunson

Great love looks boring, but it feels great.

Paul C. Brunson

If you do that, there’s a 99% likelihood you’ll break up.

Paul C. Brunson (on contempt in Gottman’s Four Horsemen)

If you have high self-esteem, you say, ‘This is my partner and I don’t care what you think.’ Then you can walk down the street with anyone.

Paul C. Brunson

Questions Answered in This Episode

You argue that partner choice is literally life-or-death; how would you design a practical, step-by-step ‘partner due diligence’ process that a 25-year-old could realistically follow?

Paul C. ...

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

Given your claim that arranged marriages often outperform love marriages, what specific, ethical ways can Western daters borrow the ‘village vetting’ advantage without giving up autonomy?

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

If Gen Z is on track to have fewer but stronger marriages, what concrete behaviors or app-usage patterns in Tinder’s data most convinced you of that prediction?

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

You say clinically diagnosed narcissists don’t fundamentally change—how should someone distinguish between a partner with fixable selfish traits and someone who’s likely in the dark tetrad and unsafe to stay with?

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

Your five fundamentals for partner selection aren’t visible on dating apps today; if you were building a new platform from scratch, how exactly would you measure and surface emotional fitness, resilient resourcefulness, and compassionate support in people’s profiles?

Get the full analysis with uListen AI

Transcript Preview

Paul C. Brunson

The number one reason for breakups is not finance, infidelity, it's... If you do that, there's a 99% likelihood you'll break up.

Steven Bartlett

That's pretty crazy when you think about it.

Paul C. Brunson

Paul Carrig Brunson.

Steven Bartlett

The world's most influential matchmaker. (gavel bangs)

Paul C. Brunson

You choose a weak partner, not only do you not live as long, not as happy, more unhealthy, but you could literally suffer death. So, who you choose is the most important decision you can make.

Steven Bartlett

So, I have questions.

Paul C. Brunson

You ready for this?

Steven Bartlett

What is the state of dating?

Paul C. Brunson

It's a hell of a problem.

Steven Bartlett

How do you spot a narcissist?

Paul C. Brunson

So, the key is to...

Steven Bartlett

This golden mean thing in your book, wh- what is that?

Paul C. Brunson

It's the optimal measure of what we consider to be sexy. For women, it's the percentage of your waist to your hips. So-

Steven Bartlett

What is the future of dating?

Paul C. Brunson

I know a lot of people are gonna be mad at me for this, but we can go there if you want to. It's like...

Steven Bartlett

Arranged marriages.

Paul C. Brunson

Data shows us people in arranged marriage have higher satisfaction because...

Steven Bartlett

And this is often where many people go wrong, what should I be looking for in a partner?

Paul C. Brunson

It has come down 10 years of research on this, there's five key characteristics that we need. One...

Steven Bartlett

Paul, I wanted to go over this thing called attachment theory because I think I'm an avoidant attachment style.

Paul C. Brunson

I love this topic. There's some phenomenal research looking at the number of orgasms that people have based on their attachment style, and if they were avoidant, the data showed that...

Steven Bartlett

No comment.

Paul C. Brunson

(laughs)

Steven Bartlett

Moving on.

Paul C. Brunson

But I have to say why, though. This is important.

Steven Bartlett

Quick one. This is really, really fascinating to me. On the backend of our YouTube channel, it says that 69.9% of you that watch this channel frequently over the lifetime of this channel haven't yet hit the subscribe button. I just wanted to ask you a favor. It helps this channel so much if you choose to su- subscribe. Helps us scale the guests, helps us scale the production, and it makes the show bigger. So, if I could ask you for one favor, if you've watched this show before and you've enjoyed it and you like this episode that you're currently watching, could you please hit the subscribe button? Thank you so much, and I will repay that gesture by making sure that everything we do here gets better and better and better and better. That is a promise I'm willing to make you. Do we have a deal? Paul, last time I had you on my show, you were a smash hit, and I look at the episodes and I can see the retention of every conversation I have. The retention is essentially how many minutes of the conversation someone listened to you, and you're a real record breaker on our show-

Install uListen to search the full transcript and get AI-powered insights

Get Full Transcript

Get more from every podcast

AI summaries, searchable transcripts, and fact-checking. Free forever.

Add to Chrome